DOCSLIB.ORG

Is the Wuhan Coronavirus a Form of Biowarfare?: a Special Interview with Francis Boyle By: Dr

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Is the Wuhan Coronavirus a Form of Biowarfare?: a Special Interview with Francis Boyle By: Dr Is the Wuhan Coronavirus a Form of Biowarfare?: A Special Interview With Francis Boyle By: Dr. Joseph Mercola Dr. Joseph Mercola: Welcome, everyone. This is Dr. Mercola helping you take control of your health and today we are joined by Francis Boyle who really has quite the pedigree. He had his undergraduate training at the University of Chicago and got his JD, lawyer degree, from Harvard and also a PhD in Political Science. He's been quite active in the protection environment from the US government in their creative strategies for bio weapons, and specifically we're talking about coronavirus today. So welcome and thank you for joining us today. Dr. Francis Boyle: Well, thank you very much for having me on, Dr. Mercola, and my best to your viewing audience. Dr. Joseph Mercola: All right, so the coronavirus is a virus that seems to have come from Wuhan, and if you're like me, most of the people in the US have probably never heard of Wuhan before, but it's a pretty big city. It's bigger than New York City, there's 11 million people in this city. So obviously China is a large country with over a billion people, but it's a still a large metropolis, it's not some rural, urban farming community. So it's affected over 50,000 people in China as we're recording this in February, February 14th, so I'm sure it's going to be more by the time this podcast airs, and I'm wondering if you could provide us with your speculations as to how this apparently engineered virus was produced and how it came to be out of Wuhan, because it wasn't due to [Batsu 00:01:42], we know that's for sure. Dr. Francis Boyle: All that's Chinese Propaganda for sure. Well, let me back up a little. I was the one who called for US domestic-implemented legislation for the Biological Weapons Convention of 1972, and drafted it, known as the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989 that was passed unanimously by both houses of the United States Congress and signed into law by George Bush, Sr. So as a result of this anti-biological warfare work going back to the early days of the Reagan administration that was using DNA genetic engineering to manufacture biological weapons, I have been observing mysterious outbreaks of disease for both humans and animals around the world since then, indeed my biowarfare anti-terrorism act was specifically designed also, not only to deal with regular biological weapons but also with DNA genetic engineering for biological weapons that was just coming into its infancy when the BWC was being drafted. And even though the BWC would cover DNA genetic engineering, I wanted to make it clear by name that it was covered, and I also made it clear it covered synthetic biology as well, that was in there, too. Dr. Francis Boyle: So when these unexplained mysterious illnesses break out, I monitor for them awhile and usually I just conclude they can be explained by normal reasons: lack of sanitation, poverty, things of that nature, but in Wuhan it seemed pretty suspicious to me, and there is this Biosafety Level 4 facility there in Wuhan, it's the first in China, it was specifically set up to deal with the coronavirus and SARS. SARS is basically a weaponized version of the coronavirus. There have been leaks before of SARS out of this facility, and indeed the only reason for these BSL-4 facilities, based on my experience, is the research, development, testing and stockpiling of offensive biological weapons. So for that reason, I stated my opinion that this Wuhan coronavirus leak out of that BSL-4 facility, the first reported case was December 1, so it depends what the incubation period is, the official party line is 14 days, a British health expert has said he believes it's 24 days. North Korea is taking the position it's 30 days, they have their own biological warfare experts there. So it seems to me there was a leak at this facility, maybe mid-November it was reported up the line, and the Chinese government has been lying about it and covering up ever since. Dr. Francis Boyle: As for Wuhan and Hubei Province, sure, they're basically under martial law. There's no other word for it. If you read even the statements by President Xi and his assistants, they've made it very clear they're at war here, and that is correct. They're at war with their own biological warfare agent. President Xi just fired the party apparatchiks in charge of this and have brought in trusted military personnel to handle it, as well as large numbers of PLA forces saying, "Well, they're healthcare workers." They don't look like healthcare workers to me. So as of now, that's my best reading of the situation, Doctor. Dr. Joseph Mercola: So it appears, at least there's some stories that are out there, that suggest that the coronavirus originally was stolen from a lab in Canada, in Winnipeg, and then brought into China at this BSL-4 facility in Wuhan. Do you have any thoughts on that? Dr. Francis Boyle: It could have been. I mean, I want to make it clear that in my opinion they were already working on that, at that Wuhan BSL-4 facility they were working on a biological warfare weapon involving SARS, which is, I said is a coronavirus to begin with. We do know that this Dr. Mengele Kawaoka up at the University of Wisconsin, he's now in Japan, I guess, which is due north of me, he resurrected the Spanish flu virus for the Pentagon, obviously for weapons purposes, and he specializes in mating the Spanish flu virus to all sorts of hideous biowarfare instrumentalities. And there was also a record then of him shipping his products up to Winnipeg. Winnipeg is Canada's equivalent of our own Fort Detrick. It's a BSL-4 facility, and yes, they research, develop tests, manufacture, stockpile every type of hideous biological warfare weapon that we know of, so some of this technology could have been stolen from Winnipeg. I don't know about that, but as I said, the Wuhan BSL-4 was already working on this to begin with. They had already developed SARS, SARS had leaked already before, two to three times before this, and it seems that they were turbocharging SARS, which that's what this looks to be the case. This is a brand new generation of biowarfare weapons we haven't seen before. Dr. Francis Boyle: Its lethality goes from 15% as estimated by Lancet, up to 17 to 18% by a British health official and even Chinese statistics. Its infectivity is 83%. It can infect maybe three to four people for every person infected. It has gain of function properties, which means it travels through air at least six or seven feet, and it does appear now there are reports that even contaminated human feces give it off, that the human feces radiate off maybe six or seven feet. So we've never seen anything like this before in the history of biological warfare, at least in the public record. Dr. Francis Boyle: I want to make it clear, Doctor, I have never worked for the United States government, I've never had a security clearance, I've never had access to any type of secret information, I just read what is in the public record and the scientific record and try to draw my own conclusions, and that's what I'm giving you today. I could change my opinion if people can provide me reputable scientific evidence to the contrary, I've made this plea before. People will send me things that don't look very convincing, so right now I'm standing by my conclusion that it leaked out of the Wuhan BSL-4, the highest level of the Chinese government has known about it, they've been covering it up from the get-go until they informed the WHO at the end of December. Well, this is a specially-designated WHO research lab, so why is the WHO specially designating a BHL-4 Nazi biological weapons lab, because the WHO is up to its eyeballs in this type of work and has been for quite some time, so you can't believe anything coming out of the WHO, you really can't believe anything coming out of the Chinese government except negative information, Doctor. Dr. Joseph Mercola: Yes, and so there's a collusion between the WHO, the CDC in the United States, and big pharma, who seems to be providing much of the financial support for these organizations [crosstalk 00:11:29]. Dr. Francis Boyle: That is correct, and I won't go through the long history of big pharma getting involved in this. There's huge amounts of money here. I believe that West Africa Ebola pandemic originated out of the US BSL-4 facility in Sierra Leone and they were testing out a so-called vaccine that contained live Ebola and gave it to these poor people. And as for the CDC, you are correct, Doctor, CDC has been involved in every type of Nazi-type BSL-4 biological warfare death science you could possibly imagine. I don't have time to go through it all here, but it's a matter of public record that during the Reagan administration the CDC and the American Type Culture Collection sent 40 shipments of weapons-grade biological warfare agents to Saddam Hussein in Iraq in the hope and expectation that he would weaponize these agents and use them against Iran in the war they had between them.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • “Smoking Gun” Bombshell Interview: Prof. Francis Boyle Exposes The
    2/23/2020 Full transcript of “smoking gun” bombshell interview: Prof. Francis Boyle exposes the bioweapons origins of the CoVid­19 coronavirus – NaturalNew… Full transcript of “smoking gun” bombshell interview: Prof. Francis Boyle exposes the bioweapons origins of the CoVid-19 coronavirus Thursday, February 20, 2020 by: Mike Adams Tags: Alex Jones, biological weapons, bioweapons, coronavirus, Francis Boyle, interview, NIH, outbreak, pandemic, transcript, virus, Wuhan (Natural News) What follows is one of the most important interviews of the year. Biological warfare expert Prof. Francis Boyle appeared as a guest with Alex Jones on the Alex Jones Show, sharing his “smoking gun” findings about the coronavirus being engineered as a weapon that’s designed, “for efficient spreading in the human population,” according to one of the science papers he references. We confirmed Prof. Boyle’s findings by purchasing the full PDF of that paper and reviewing it in a detailed article we posted yesterday at this link. That paper describes the CoVid­19 novel coronavirus as possessing unique “gain­of­function” properties that make it the perfect bioweapon, while confirming these new properties were from artificial origins, not natural viral evolution. (In other words, it was engineered.) Below, we print the full transcript of the Francis Boyle / Alex Jones interview, along with the video of the full exchange below, via Brighteon.com. (The full show is also posted on Banned.video) If you hope to understand anything about what’s happening right now with the coronavirus pandemic, the global cover­up and how the taxpayer­funded NIH is behind these biological weapons, you need to hear and share this interview.
    [Show full text]
  • Why the Good Guys Lost in <Em>Rice V. Cayetano</Em>
    Michigan Journal of Race and Law Volume 7 2002 Not Because They are Brown, But Because of Ea*: Why the Good Guys Lost in Rice V. Cayetano, and Why They Didn't Have to Lose Gavin Clarkson Harvard University Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjrl Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, Indian and Aboriginal Law Commons, Law and Race Commons, Legal History Commons, and the State and Local Government Law Commons Recommended Citation Gavin Clarkson, Not Because They are Brown, But Because of Ea*: Why the Good Guys Lost in Rice V. Cayetano, and Why They Didn't Have to Lose, 7 MICH. J. RACE & L. 317 (2002). Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjrl/vol7/iss2/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Michigan Journal of Race and Law by an authorized editor of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NOT BECAUSE THEY ARE BROWN, BUT BECAUSE OF EA*:WHY THE GOOD GUYS LOST IN RICE V CAYETANO, AND WHY THEY DIDN'T HAVE TO LOSE Gavin Clarkson** IN TR O D U C T IO N ..........................................................................317 I. CONTEXTUAL PERSPECTIVE ON RELEVANT HISTORY ..........................319 A . Pre-C ontact .................................................................... 320 B. Treaty Making and Removal (1789-1871) ............................. 320 C. Allotment and Assimilation (1871-1928) ............................... 325 D. The Period of Indian Reorganization (1928-1945) ................... 329 E. The Termination Period (1945-1961) ...................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Genocide of the Palestinian People: an International Law and Human Rights Perspective While There Has Been Recent Criticis
    The Genocide of the Palestinian People: An International Law and Human Rights Perspective While there has been recent criticism of those taking the position that Israel is committing genocide against Palestinians, there is a long history of human rights scholarship and legal analysis that supports the assertion. Prominent scholars of the international law crime of genocide and human rights authorities take the position that Israel’s policies toward the Palestinian people could constitute a form of genocide. Those policies range from the 1948 mass killing and displacement of Palestinians to a half- century of military occupation and, correspondingly, the discriminatory legal regime governing Palestinians, repeated military assaults on Gaza, and official Israeli statements expressly favoring the elimination of Palestinians. Genocide is a term that has both sociological and legal meaning. The term genocide was coined in 1944 by a Jewish Polish legal scholar, Raphael Lemkin. For Lemkin, “the term does not necessarily signify mass killings.” He explained: More often [genocide] refers to a coordinated plan aimed at destruction of the essential foundations of the life of national groups so that these groups wither and die like plants that have suffered a blight. The end may be accomplished by the forced disintegration of political and social institutions, of the culture of the people, of their language, their national feelings and their religion. It may be accomplished by wiping out all basis of personal security, liberty, health and dignity. When these means fail the machine gun can always be utilized as a last resort. Genocide is directed against a national group as an entity and the attack on individuals is only secondary to the annihilation of the national group to which they belong.1 Since Lemkin’s first invocation of the term, it has gained political, social, and legal meaning.
    [Show full text]
  • Dental White Paper
    Institute for Science in Medicine WHITE PAPER THE ANTI-FLUORIDATIONIST THREAT TO PUBLIC HEALTH PREPARED BY JOHN E. DODES, DDS, FISM AND MICHAEL W. EASLEY, DDS, MPH, FISM APRIL 2012 Institute for Science in Medicine (ISM) is an international, educational and public-policy or- ganization comprised of health care professionals, scientists, and researchers who agree that the best science available should be used to determine health policy and to establish a standard of care that both protects and promotes the public health. We necessarily oppose policies which erode a science-based standard of care and thereby significantly expose the public to fraudulent, worthless, or harmful medical practices and products. Copyright 2012 by Institute for Science in Medicine. Permission to reproduce in its entirety is hereby granted, provided that it is not altered, not distributed for commercial purposes, and this notice is in- cluded. All other rights are reserved. White Paper: The Anti-Fluoridationist Threat to Public Health Declared by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to be one of the ten greatest public- health achievements of the Twentieth Century,1 community water fluoridation has been under attack by a small band of critics since its inception. The scientific consensus over fluoridation’s health benefits, safety, social justice, and economies has been firmly established over six decades of widespread use in the United States and elsewhere. Nevertheless, anti-science critics have never relented in their opposition — recycling previously disproven charges of harm, inventing new ones out of whole cloth, misrepresenting scientific facts and research, exaggerating risks, understating benefits, inappropriately invoking the precautionary principle, and accusing public health officials of corruption, conspiracy, and ‘mass medication’ of whole populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Download File
    Page 1 “A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes.” Mark Twain’s quote is more relevant than ever in times of online communication, where information or misinformation, bundled in bits and bytes, streams around the earth within seconds. SUMMARY This UNICEF working paper aims to track and analyse online anti-vaccination sentiment in social media networks by examining conversations across social media in English, Russian, Romanian and Polish. The findings support the assumption that parents actively use social networks and blogs to inform their decisions on vaccinating their children. The paper proposes a research model that detects and clusters commonly-used keywords and intensity of user interaction. The end goal is the development of targeted and efficient engagement strategies for health and communication experts in the field as well as for partner organisations. DISCLAIMER UNICEF working papers aim to facilitate greater exchange of knowledge and stimulate analytical discussion on an issue. This text has not been edited to official publications standards. Extracts from this paper may be freely reproduced with due acknowledgement. For the purposes of this research, no personal data has been extracted and stored for data collection and analysis. Page 2 CONTENT 1. Rationale 4 2. Introduction 5 2.1 Social Media: the conversation shift 5 2.2 Social Media: Fertile ground for anti- 5 vaccination sentiment 2.3 Social Media Monitoring 7 2.4 Influencers 8 3. Research Objectives 9 4. Methodology 11 4.1 Descriptive and Explorative Research Design 11 4.2 Data Collection 12 4.3 Limitations 13 4.4 Ethical Considerations 13 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Possible Dangers of Mandated COVID-19 Vaccination: a Special Interview with Barbara Loe Fisher by Dr
    Possible Dangers of Mandated COVID-19 Vaccination: A Special Interview With Barbara Loe Fisher By Dr. Joseph Mercola Dr. Mercola Welcome everyone, Dr. Mercola, helping you take control of your health and today we're joined with a veteran, the famous Barbara Loe Fisher, who is the co-founder of the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC), which is one of the best organizations out there, certainly one of the oldest providing objective, non-biased information about vaccines to help people make an informed choice about whether or not they want to participate in the vaccine program. Welcome and thank you for joining us today because we've got loads of information to discuss since the last time we talked. Barbara Loe Fisher: That's so true. Dr. Mercola [Crosstalk 00:00:38]. Barbara Loe Fisher: In a way, it's a culmination what's happened this year of everything we have been talking about for the last decade. I know back in 1993, I started to predict that the day would come when Americans would not be able to participate in society without showing proof they've been vaccinated with whatever the government says they have to be vaccinated with, and I think we're most definitely heading that way right now. It's been unprecedented what's happened in this country, and really around the world since January. Dr. Mercola A very clever and sophisticated strategy to implement that goal, for sure, and most of us or many of us believe it was planned for certain. I think that is probably the main topic of discussion, and there's so many other things that we can go on and tangents to it, but it's this mandatory vaccination.
    [Show full text]
  • Complaint for Permanent Injunction and Other Equitable Relief
    Case: 1:16-cv-04282 Document #: 2 Filed: 04/13/16 Page 1 of 22 PageID #:2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Case No. 16 CV 4282 Plaintiff, v. COMPLAINT FOR MERCOLA.COM, LLC, a limited liability PERMANENT company, INJUNCTION AND OTHER EQUITABLE RELIEF MERCOLA.COM HEALTH RESOURCES, LLC, a limited liability company, and DR. JOSEPH MERCOLA, individually and as an owner, officer, and director of MERCOLA.COM, LLC, and MERCOLA.COM HEALTH RESOURCES, LLC, Defendants. Plaintiff, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”), for its Complaint alleges: 1. The FTC brings this action under Section 13(b) of the Federal Trade Commission Act (“FTC Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 53(b), to obtain a permanent injunction, rescission or reformation of contracts, restitution, the refund of monies paid, disgorgement of ill-gotten monies, and other equitable relief for Defendants’ acts or practices in violation of Sections 5(a) and 12 of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. § 45(a) and 52, in connection with the labeling, advertising, marketing, distribution, and sale of Mercola brand indoor tanning systems. 1 Case: 1:16-cv-04282 Document #: 2 Filed: 04/13/16 Page 2 of 22 PageID #:3 JURISDICTION AND VENUE 2. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1337(a), and 1345, and 15 U.S.C. §§ 45(a) and 53(b). 3. Venue is proper in this district under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(1), (b)(2), (b)(3), (c)(1), (c)(2), and (d), and 15 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • International Crisis and Neutrality: United States Foreign Policy Toward the Iran-Iraq War
    Mercer Law Review Volume 43 Number 2 Lead Articles I - The Legal Article 1 Implications of a Nation at War 3-1992 International Crisis and Neutrality: United States Foreign Policy Toward the Iran-Iraq War Francis A. Boyle Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.mercer.edu/jour_mlr Part of the International Law Commons, and the Military, War, and Peace Commons Recommended Citation Boyle, Francis A. (1992) "International Crisis and Neutrality: United States Foreign Policy Toward the Iran- Iraq War," Mercer Law Review: Vol. 43 : No. 2 , Article 1. Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.mercer.edu/jour_mlr/vol43/iss2/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Mercer Law School Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Mercer Law Review by an authorized editor of Mercer Law School Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LEAD ARTICLES International Crisis and Neutrality: United States Foreign Policy Toward the Iran-Iraq War by Francis A. Boyle* Prescript This Article was written in 1986 and submitted to the University of New Orleans Symposium on Neutrality. The Article reflects the author's analysis regarding the United States military intervensionism into the Middle East with a special focus on the Persian Gulf region. The author analyzes the United States' policies to divide-and-conquer the Arab oil * Professor of International Law, University of Illinois College of Law, Champaign, Illi- nois. University of Chicago (A.B., 1971); Harvard Law School (J.D., magna cum laude, 1976); Harvard University (A.M., 1978 and Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Palestine, Palestinians and International Law, by Francis Boyle
    This is a draft of "Introduction: Standing in Solidarity with the Palestinian People" to the book, Palestine, Palestinians & International Law by Francis A. Boyle, Clarity Press, Inc., 2003, 205 pp. The following is mirrored from its source at: http://www.derechos.org/human-rights/mena/doc/boyle3.html with extensions to enhance its utility. Palestine, Palestinians and International Law by Francis A. Boyle 29 March 2002 Human Rights in the Middle East and North Africa The Big Lie Chicago Entebbe Lecture The American-Israel Society of International Standing in solidarity with the Palestinian People Suing for Sabra and Shatilla Creating the Palestinian State Etc. Sparring with Jordan The Intifada The Palestinian Declaration of Independence Moving the Mountain On Their Own Middle East Peace Negotiations? The Oslo Bantustan Jerusalem U.S. Mideast Policy v. International Law Dishumanitarian Intervention by the United States of America against Palestine and the Palestinians I am not Arab. I am not Jewish. I am not Palestinian. I am not Israeli. I am Irish American. Our People have no proverbial "horse in this race." What follows is to the best of my immediate recollection: The Big Lie Growing up in the United States during the late 1950s and early 1960s while strongly supporting the just struggle of African Americans for civil rights, I was brainwashed at school as well as by the mainstream news media and popular culture to be just as pro-Israel as everyone else in America. Then came the 1967 Middle East War. At that time, my assessment of the situation was that Israel had attacked these Arab countries first, stolen their lands, and then driven out their respective peoples from their homes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Truth About COVID-19 Exposing the Great Reset, Lockdowns, Vaccine Passports, and the New Normal Dr
    Also by Dr. Joseph Mercola EMF*D: 5G, Wi-Fi and Cell Phones: Hidden Harms and How to Protect Yourself (2020) KetoFast: Rejuvenate Your Health With a Step-by-Step Guide to Timing Your Ketogenic Meals (2019) Fat for Fuel: A Revolutionary Diet to Combat Cancer, Boost Brain Power, and Increase Your Energy (2017) Effortless Healing: 9 Simple Ways to Sidestep Illness, Shed Excess Weight, and Help Your Body Fix Itself (2015) The Great Bird Flu Hoax: The Truth They Don’t Want You to Know About the ‘Next Big Pandemic’ (2006, with Pam Killeen) The No-Grain Diet: Conquer Carbohydrate Addiction and Stay Slim for Life (2003, with Alison Rose Levy) Dark Deception: Discover the Truth About the Benefits of Sunlight Exposure (2008, with Jeffry Herman) Generation XL: Raising Healthy, Intelligent Kids in a High-Tech, Junk-Food World (2007, with Ben Lerner) Healthy Recipes for Your Nutritional Type (2007, with Kendra Degen Pearsall) Take Control of Your Health (2007, with Kendra Degen Pearsall) Sweet Deception: Why Splenda®, NutraSweet®, and the FDA May Be Hazardous to Your Health (2006, with Kendra Degen Pearsall) Also by Ronnie Cummins Grassroots Rising: A Call to Action on Climate, Farming, Food, and a Green New Deal Genetically Engineered Food a Self-Defense Guide for Consumers (2000, with Ben Lilliston) Children of the World (1990, a five-book series) The Truth About COVID-19 Exposing The Great Reset, Lockdowns, Vaccine Passports, and the New Normal Dr. Joseph Mercola Ronnie Cummins Foreword by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Chelsea Green Publishing White River Junction, Vermont London, UK Copyright © 2021 by Florida Health Publishing, LLC.
    [Show full text]
  • The Truth Behind Operation Warp Speed: a Special Interview with Whitney Webb by Dr
    The Truth Behind Operation Warp Speed: A Special Interview With Whitney Webb By Dr. Joseph Mercola Dr. Joseph Mercola: Welcome everyone. This is Dr. Mercola helping you take control of your health. And today we're in for a real treat. We are going to be joined by one of the, what I view, as the most brilliant investigative journalist out there today in this space. And that journalist is Whitney Webb. She's been doing this for a while and really is able to scour the internet for details that really only a truly committed high-integrity individual who is sincerely interested in finding the bottom line and the details on this can do. So we're really excited to have her and so I want to welcome, and thank you for joining us today. Whitney Webb: Thank you. It's my pleasure. Dr. Joseph Mercola: All right. So before we start, I think it's always wise to get a little historical background on our guests. So as I mentioned you're an investigative journalist, but I didn't say this, you're down in Southern Chile. And maybe you can tell us a little bit of the backstory why you're there. And then also how you started this work, because you really have achieved a level of investigative excellence that I just rarely encounter. Whitney Webb: Well, my time here or the way I arrived at Chile was kind of accidental in a couple ways. After I graduated from university, I ended up working in Cusco, Peru and I met the father of my daughter, who is Julian, and eventually came down here and that's where I've been ever since.
    [Show full text]
  • The Campaign for Israeli Divestment and the Charge of Anti-Semitism by Joseph Kay 10 April 2003 World Socialist Web Site
    The following is mirrored from its source at: http://www.wsws.org/articles/2003/apr2003/div-a10.shtml with additional links added. The campaign for Israeli divestment and the charge of anti-Semitism By Joseph Kay 10 April 2003 World Socialist Web Site The campaign against "anti-Semitism" on campus Anti-Semitism and anti-Zionism The historical origins of Zionism In response to an escalation of Israeli aggression over the past year, a growing movement has emerged on American campuses opposing the oppression of the Palestinian population. Student groups have held numerous protests at universities throughout the country, and most recently a movement has gained force that calls for the divestment of university assets from Israeli corporations and US firms doing business with Israel. These groups have faced a wave of denunciations, including baseless accusations of anti-Semitism and support for terrorism. University officials have joined hands with Zionist organizations and representatives of both political parties in slandering students and faculty who have joined the movement. The specter of anti-Semitism is raised as part of an effort to de-legitimize any opposition to the policies of the Israeli government and its principal supporter, the United States. The role of university administrations in bolstering the charge of anti-Semitism against supporters of divestment is particularly noteworthy. It is an anti-democratic attempt to intimidate and silence the political views of a section of the student body. The ferocity of the denunciations indicates in its own way the validity of the criticisms: because the policies of the Israeli state cannot be seriously defended through political argument, its supporters attempt to stifle any discussion.
    [Show full text]