DOCSLIB.ORG

Absolute Advantage Absolute Advantage

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Absolute Advantage Absolute Advantage Absolute Advantage Absolute Advantage Two countries: Alpha and Omega. Absolute Advantage Two countries: Alpha and Omega. Two goods: computers and cars. Absolute Advantage Two countries: Alpha and Omega. Two goods: computers and cars. Both goods are produced using labor as the only input. Absolute Advantage Two countries: Alpha and Omega. Two goods: computers and cars. Both goods are produced using labor as the only input. In Alpha, 2 workers = 1 car and 10 workers = 1 computer. Absolute Advantage Two countries: Alpha and Omega. Two goods: computers and cars. Both goods are produced using labor as the only input. In Alpha, 2 workers = 1 car and 10 workers = 1 computer. In Omega, 4 workers = 1 car and 100 workers = 1 computer. Absolute Advantage Two countries: Alpha and Omega. Two goods: computers and cars. Both goods are produced using labor as the only input. In Alpha, 2 workers = 1 car and 10 workers = 1 computer. In Omega, 4 workers = 1 car and 100 workers = 1 computer. Alpha produces both goods more efficiently (i.e., using fewer resources) than Omega. Absolute Advantage Two countries: Alpha and Omega. Two goods: computers and cars. Both goods are produced using labor as the only input. In Alpha, 2 workers = 1 car and 10 workers = 1 computer. In Omega, 4 workers = 1 car and 100 workers = 1 computer. Alpha produces both goods more efficiently (i.e., using fewer resources) than Omega. Alpha has an absolute advantage in the production of both goods relative to Omega. Comparative Advantage in Producing Computers Comparative Advantage in Producing Computers Alpha must give up 5 cars to produce 1 computer: its opportunity cost of producing 1 computer is 5 cars. Comparative Advantage in Producing Computers Alpha must give up 5 cars to produce 1 computer: its opportunity cost of producing 1 computer is 5 cars. Omega must give up 25 cars to produce 1 computer: its opportunity cost of producing 1 computer is 25 cars. Comparative Advantage in Producing Computers Alpha must give up 5 cars to produce 1 computer: its opportunity cost of producing 1 computer is 5 cars. Omega must give up 25 cars to produce 1 computer: its opportunity cost of producing 1 computer is 25 cars. Because Alpha’s opportunity cost of producing computers is smaller than Omega’s, Alpha has a comparative advantage in producing computers (relative to Omega). Comparative Advantage in Producing Cars Comparative Advantage in Producing Cars Alpha must give up 0.2 computers to produce 1 car: its opportunity cost of producing 1 car is 0.2 computers. Comparative Advantage in Producing Cars Alpha must give up 0.2 computers to produce 1 car: its opportunity cost of producing 1 car is 0.2 computers. Omega must give up 0.04 computers to produce 1 car: its opportunity cost of producing 1 car is 0.04 cars. Comparative Advantage in Producing Cars Alpha must give up 0.2 computers to produce 1 car: its opportunity cost of producing 1 car is 0.2 computers. Omega must give up 0.04 computers to produce 1 car: its opportunity cost of producing 1 car is 0.04 cars. Because Omega’s opportunity cost of producing cars is smaller than Alpha’s, Omega has a comparative advantage in producing cars (relative to Alpha). Comparative Advantage in Producing Cars Alpha must give up 0.2 computers to produce 1 car: its opportunity cost of producing 1 car is 0.2 computers. Omega must give up 0.04 computers to produce 1 car: its opportunity cost of producing 1 car is 0.04 cars. Because Omega’s opportunity cost of producing cars is smaller than Alpha’s, Omega has a comparative advantage in producing cars (relative to Alpha). Even if a country has an absolute disadvantage in all goods, it will nonetheless have a comparative advantage in some good. World Output with and without Specialization World Output with and without Specialization Let each country have 1000 workers, and suppose that each country allocates half its workers to each of the goods: World Output with and without Specialization Let each country have 1000 workers, and suppose that each country allocates half its workers to each of the goods: Output of cars Output of computers World Output with and without Specialization Let each country have 1000 workers, and suppose that each country allocates half its workers to each of the goods: Output of cars Output of computers Alpha 250 50 World Output with and without Specialization Let each country have 1000 workers, and suppose that each country allocates half its workers to each of the goods: Output of cars Output of computers Alpha 250 50 Omega 125 5 World Output with and without Specialization Let each country have 1000 workers, and suppose that each country allocates half its workers to each of the goods: Output of cars Output of computers Alpha 250 50 Omega 125 5 Total 375 55 World Output with and without Specialization Let each country have 1000 workers, and suppose that each country allocates half its workers to each of the goods: Output of cars Output of computers Alpha 250 50 Omega 125 5 Total 375 55 Suppose now that each country specializes in its comparative advantage. World Output with and without Specialization Let each country have 1000 workers, and suppose that each country allocates half its workers to each of the goods: Output of cars Output of computers Alpha 250 50 Omega 125 5 Total 375 55 Suppose now that each country specializes in its comparative advantage.Forexample,Alpha puts 300 workers in cars and 700 workers in computers, World Output with and without Specialization Let each country have 1000 workers, and suppose that each country allocates half its workers to each of the goods: Output of cars Output of computers Alpha 250 50 Omega 125 5 Total 375 55 Suppose now that each country specializes in its comparative advantage.Forexample,Alpha puts 300 workers in cars and 700 workers in computers, and Omega puts all its workers in cars: World Output with and without Specialization Let each country have 1000 workers, and suppose that each country allocates half its workers to each of the goods: Output of cars Output of computers Alpha 250 50 Omega 125 5 Total 375 55 Suppose now that each country specializes in its comparative advantage.Forexample,Alpha puts 300 workers in cars and 700 workers in computers, and Omega puts all its workers in cars: Output of cars Output of computers World Output with and without Specialization Let each country have 1000 workers, and suppose that each country allocates half its workers to each of the goods: Output of cars Output of computers Alpha 250 50 Omega 125 5 Total 375 55 Suppose now that each country specializes in its comparative advantage.Forexample,Alpha puts 300 workers in cars and 700 workers in computers, and Omega puts all its workers in cars: Output of cars Output of computers Alpha 150 70 World Output with and without Specialization Let each country have 1000 workers, and suppose that each country allocates half its workers to each of the goods: Output of cars Output of computers Alpha 250 50 Omega 125 5 Total 375 55 Suppose now that each country specializes in its comparative advantage.Forexample,Alpha puts 300 workers in cars and 700 workers in computers, and Omega puts all its workers in cars: Output of cars Output of computers Alpha 150 70 Omega 250 0 World Output with and without Specialization Let each country have 1000 workers, and suppose that each country allocates half its workers to each of the goods: Output of cars Output of computers Alpha 250 50 Omega 125 5 Total 375 55 Suppose now that each country specializes in its comparative advantage.Forexample,Alpha puts 300 workers in cars and 700 workers in computers, and Omega puts all its workers in cars: Output of cars Output of computers Alpha 150 70 Omega 250 0 Total 400 70 Trade Trade Now allow Alpha and Omega to trade with each other. Trade Now allow Alpha and Omega to trade with each other. Suppose the terms of trade are set at 12 cars for 1 computer. Trade Now allow Alpha and Omega to trade with each other. Suppose the terms of trade are set at 12 cars for 1 computer. Alpha is happy to give up 1 computer in exchange for 12 cars because its opportunity cost of producing 1 computer is only 5 cars (i.e., in the absence of trade, it gets only 5 extra cars when it produces 1 less computer). Trade Now allow Alpha and Omega to trade with each other. Suppose the terms of trade are set at 12 cars for 1 computer. Alpha is happy to give up 1 computer in exchange for 12 cars because its opportunity cost of producing 1 computer is only 5 cars (i.e., in the absence of trade, it gets only 5 extra cars when it produces 1 less computer). Omega is happy to give up 12 cars in exchange for 1 computer because its opportunity cost of producing 1 computer is 25 cars (i.e., in the absence of trade, it must give up 25 cars in order to produce 1 more computer). Trade Now allow Alpha and Omega to trade with each other. Suppose the terms of trade are set at 12 cars for 1 computer. Alpha is happy to give up 1 computer in exchange for 12 cars because its opportunity cost of producing 1 computer is only 5 cars (i.e., in the absence of trade, it gets only 5 extra cars when it produces 1 less computer).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Distributional Effect of International Trade and Comparative Advantage in Labor Markets∗
    Distributional Effect of International Trade and Comparative Advantage in Labor Markets∗ Rodrigo Adão MIT September 20, 2015 Abstract This paper investigates the distributional consequences of international trade shocks in the con- text of the Brazilian labor market. First, I document a new set of facts about how differential ex- posure to commodity price shocks across educational groups and regions leads to differential out- comes in terms of sectoral employment and wages. Second, I show that such facts are qualitatively consistent with a two-sector Roy model where worker heterogeneity regarding comparative and ab- solute advantage in sector-specific tasks determines the structure of employment and wages. Third, I establish that the schedules of comparative and absolute advantage are nonparametrically iden- tified from cross-regional variation in sectoral responses of employment and wages induced by sector demand shocks. Lastly, I build on this result to structurally estimate the model in the sample of Brazilian local labor markets. My structural estimates indicate that a 10% decrease in commod- ity prices causes counterfactual increases of 1.2% in the skill wage premium and of 5% in wage dispersion. ∗Author contact information: [email protected]. I am extremely grateful to Daron Acemoglu, Arnaud Costinot and Dave Donaldson for invaluable guidance and support. I also thank Pol Antras, David Autor, Arthur Braganca, Ariel Burstein, Dejanir Silva as well as seminar participant at the MIT Labor Lunch and the MIT Macro-International Lunch. All errors are my own. 1 1 Introduction In an integrated world economy, shocks in a particular country have the potential to exert different effects across different workers within another country located on the other side of the globe.
    [Show full text]
  • International Trade
    International Trade or centuries, people of the world have traded. From the ancient silk routes and spice trade to modern F shipping containers and satellite data transfers, nations have tied their economies to the rest of the world by complex flows of products and services. Free trade, which allows traders to interact without barriers imposed by government, can improve the living standards of people because it reduces prices and increases the variety of goods and services for consumers. It can also create new jobs and opportunities, and it encourages innovative uses of resources. However, even though free trade can benefit an economy as a whole, specific groups may be hurt. While certain sectors will experience job gains, others will face job losses. Still, societies throughout history have found that the benefits of international trade outweigh the costs. Why Trade? As consumers, all of us have an interest in trading they live, is because they believe they will be better with other countries. We often are unaware of trade’s off by trading. When we consider the alternative— influence on product prices and the quality and each of us producing everything for ourselves—trade availability of the goods we buy. But we all benefit simply makes more sense. from the greater abundance and variety of products and the lower prices that trading with others makes Trade is beneficial because it allows people to possible. Without trade, countries become isolated. specialize, or concentrate their work in the type of The quality of their goods and services lags behind production that they do best.
    [Show full text]
  • 252 Effects of Comparative Advantage on Exports
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by AMH International (E-Journals) Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies Vol. 5, No. 5, pp. 252-259, May 2013 (ISSN: 2220-6140) Effects of comparative advantage on exports: A case study of Iranian industrial subsectors Masoud Nonejad*, Samira Zamani Islamic Azad University of Shiraz, Iran *[email protected] Abstract: One of the informational requirements in planning import and export activities is to an awareness of a country’s comparative advantage in the production of goods and services. The present paper attempts to assess Iran’s Revealed Comparative Advantage (RCA) in industrial subsectors based on two-digit code of the International Standard Industrial Classification (ISIC) and effects of five top subsectors with the highest average of RCA on the total Iranian real industrial exports. RCAs for Iranian industrial subsectors (during 2001-2010) were calculated for 2001-2010 time period and seasonal data (2001- 2010) were collected to estimate the RCA Model. Auto Regressive Distributed Lags (ARDL) Method was employed to investigate the effects of these subsectors on the total Iranian real industrial exports. The econometric results show that the subsectors with highest RCA average have a positive and significant effect on the total Iranian real industrial exports. Key words: Revealed Comparative Advantage, Iranian industrial subsectors, Auto Regressive Distributed Lags (ARDL), Error Correction Model (ECM) 1. Introduction Today, foreign trade comprises a significant part of economic activities in many countries throughout the world. Besides, the significance and the role of foreign trade in the countries’ economic development have been rising since the early 19th century due to an unprecedented growth in the global economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Rural 3.0. a Framework for Rural Development (Policy Note)
    POLICY NOTE RURAL 3.0. A FRAMEWORK FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT ABOUT This Policy Note shares the OECD’s Rural Policy 3.0—a framework to help national governments support rural economic development. The New Rural Paradigm, endorsed in 2006 by OECD member countries, proposed a conceptual framework that positioned rural policy as an investment strategy to promote competitiveness in rural territories. This approach represented a radical departure from the typical subsidy programmes of the past that were aimed at specific sectors. Rural Policy 3.0 is an extension and a refinement of this Paradigm. Where the New Rural Paradigm provided a conceptual framework, the Rural Policy 3.0 focuses on identifying more specific mechanisms for the implementation of effective rural policies and practices. For more information: http://www.oecd.org/regional/regional- policy/oecdworkonruraldevelopment.htm Forllow us on Twitter: @OECD_local #OECDrural © OECD 2018 This work is published under the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD. The opinions expressed and arguments employed herein do not necessarily reflect the official views of the Organisation or of the governments of its member countries. This document and any map included herein are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. │ 3 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ECO 212 – Macroeconomics Yellow Pages ANSWERS Unit 1
    ECO 212 – Macroeconomics Yellow Pages ANSWERS Unit 1 Mark Healy William Rainey Harper College E-Mail: [email protected] Office: J-262 Phone: 847-925-6352 Which of the 5 Es of Economics BEST explains the statements that follow: Economic Growth Allocative Efficiency Productive Efficiency o not using more resources than necessary o using resources where they are best suited o using the appropriate technology Equity Full Employment Shortage of Super Bowl Tickets – Allocative Efficiency Coke lays off 6000 employees and still produces the same amount – Productive Efficiency Free trade – Productive Efficiency More resources – Economic Growth Producing more music downloads and fewer CDs – Allocative Efficiency Law of Diminishing Marginal Utility - Equity Using all available resources – Full Employment Discrimination – Productive Efficiency "President Obama Example" - Equity improved technology – Economic Growth Due to an economic recession many companies lay off workers – Full Employment A "fair" distribution of goods and services - Equity Food price controls – Allocative Efficiency Secretaries type letters and truck drivers drive trucks – Productive Efficiency Due to government price supports farmers grow too much grain – Allocative Efficiency Kodak Cuts Jobs - see article below o October 24, 2001 Posted: 1728 GMT [http://edition.cnn.com/2001/BUSINESS/10/24/kodak/index.html NEW YORK (CNNmoney) -- Eastman Kodak Co. posted a sharp drop in third- quarter profits Wednesday and warned the current quarter won't be much better, adding it will cut up to 4,000 more jobs. .Film and photography companies have been struggling with the adjustment to a shift to digital photography as the market for traditional film continues to shrink. Which of the 5Es explains this news article? Explain.
    [Show full text]
  • OECD Economic Studies – No. 36, 2003/I
    OECD Economic Studies No. 36, 2003/1 THE INFLUENCE OF POLICIES ON TRADE AND FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT Giuseppe Nicoletti, Stephen S. Golub, Dana Hajkova, Daniel Mirza and Kwang-Yeol Yoo TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction................................................................................................................................. 8 Recent trends in trade, FDI and the internationalisation of production............................. 9 Trends in FDI ........................................................................................................................... 10 Trade developments: goods and services........................................................................... 17 Twin developments in FDI and trade................................................................................... 22 Policy and other determinants of trade and international investment............................... 24 Openness................................................................................................................................. 24 Product-market regulation..................................................................................................... 33 Labour-market arrangements................................................................................................ 37 Infrastructure ........................................................................................................................... 38 Geographical and economic factors ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The World Trade System
    International the world trade system how it works and what’s wrong with it | september 2003 rod harbinson/www.diversityphotos.com the world trade system how it works and what’s wrong with it I august 2003 This briefi ng, one in a series entitled Sale of the Century? from Friends of the Earth International, examines the theories, impacts and institutions of world trade and assesses the infl uence of transnational corporations. contents 10 reasons why the world trade system harms people and the planet I 2 10 reasons why the wto harms people and the planet I 4 who said what? – notable quotes about ‘free trade’ ? I 6 introduction I 7 why do we trade? I 8 what is trade? I 8 why trade? I 8 trade fl ows I 9 what is ‘free trade’ and what’s wrong with it? I 11 the history of ‘free trade’ I 11 ‘free trade’ theory and its fl aws I 11 the impacts of ‘free trade’ I 13 governments, corporations and trade issues I 21 the world trade organisation - past, present and future I 27 principles I 27 content, structure and processes I 28 the third ministerial conference, seattle I 29 the fourth ministerial conference, doha I 30 the fi fth ministerial conference, cancún I 31 conclusion I 37 key references and reading I 38 contacts I 40 other briefi ngs in this series include: the world trade system: winners and losers towards sustainable economies: challenging neoliberal economic globalisation trade and people’s food sovereignty You are invited to reproduce information from this briefi ng, but asked to acknowledge Friends of the Earth International as the source of your information.
    [Show full text]
  • Academic Year 2018- 2019 Third Term Economics Revision Sheets
    Academic Year 2018- 2019 Third Term Economics Revision sheets Name: ________________________ Date: _______________ Grade: 11 Sections: _____________ SECTION A: DIAGNOSIS: I: Choose the letter of the choice that best answer the questions; 1. A depreciation of a currency occurs when__________________ a) The value of currency falls b) The value of the currency increases c) Inflation falls d) Balance of payment improves 2. If one Canadian dollar is equal to US$0.6134, then one US dollar is equal to how many C$? a) $1.6303 b) $1.5406 c) $1.5967 d) $1.4534 3. If one Euro is equal to C$1.4904, then one Canadian dollar is equal to how many Euros? a) 0.6453 b) 0.6767 c) 0.6710 d) 0.6545 Page 1 of 6 4. Appreciation of a currency is ___________. a) the increase in the value of one currency in terms of another. b) the decrease in the value of one currency in terms of another. c) A sudden increase in the value of a currency that had previously been fixed in value. d) an sudden decrease in the value of a currency that had previously been fixed in value. 5. Demand-pull inflation may be caused by_________. a) An increase in costs b) A reduction in interest rates c) A reduction in government spending d) An outward shift in aggregate supply 6. The rapid increase in the price level is defined as ____________ a) Inflation b) Hyperinflation c) Stagflation d) None of above 7. Inflation always reduces the ____________ a) Cost of production b) prices of product c) Reduces the standard of living e) All of the above.
    [Show full text]
  • 5 Conclusions
    as an import barrier than an export subsidy. 5 Conclusions In this paper we assessed the effect of trade policies on external balances by adopting an approach that exploits differences in sectoral specialization and trade costs. To do so, we used (for the most part) data on bilateral trade flows to infer trade costs and sectoral comparative advantage for a globally representative set of countries over varying time periods. We also proposed an effective trade cost measure that weights trade costs by comparative advantage, thereby more accurately capturing costs that pertain to sectors in which countries may have a greater underlying potential to export and import. We found a modestly robust link between effective trade costs and current account outcomes. Thus, countries facing higher effective costs to export tend to have only somewhat lower CA balances, which implies that the overall contribution of trade costs to global imbalances has been small. These results are consistent with previous theoretical predictions suggesting limited effects of trade costs on current account balances. One limitation of this approach is that our estimates could be biased by the potential for causality to instead run from the CA to effective trade costs. Dekle, Eaton, and Kortum (2008) point out that movements in the current account can have general equilibrium effects on sectoral prices and wages, which in turn can have implications for comparative advantage. In the Eaton and Kortum (2002) framework that we adopt, such effects would be eliminated from our comparative advantage measure via the normalization by the country average of absolute advantage (`ala Hanson et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Part II Core Theory: Classic International Trade Theories
    Part II Core Theory: Classic International Trade Theories Table of Contents Part II Core Theory: Classic International Trade Theories.........................2 1. Mercantilism ...........................................................................................2 The Classical World of David Ricardo and Comparative (Chapter 3).......3 Advantage ...................................................................................................3 Absolute Advantage and Comparative Advantage .....................................5 Problems of Using Absolute Advantage to Guide Allocation of Tasks......8 Ricardian Comparative Advantage.............................................................9 Resource Constraints: ...............................................................................18 Complete Specialization: ..........................................................................20 Technological take over by less developed countries...............................21 Production Possibilities: ...........................................................................21 Complete versus Partial Specialization ....................................................23 The case of a small country ......................................................................24 Some concluding observations .................................................................25 2. Extensions and Tests of the Classical Model of Trade (chapter 4).......26 2.1 The classical model in money terms...................................................27
    [Show full text]
  • International Economics Questions Part I Question D
    International Economics questions Part I A nation's ability to produce a product more efficiently than another country is referred to as a. globalization. b. foreign trade. c. interdependence. d. absolute advantage. Question A nation's ability to produce a product more efficiently than another country is referred to as a. globalization. b. foreign trade. c. interdependence. d. absolute advantage. Answer Nebraska specializes in the production of corn and Maine specializes in the production of lobsters, therefore the two states could engage in trade that benefits both parties. This law of economics is known as a. supply and demand. b. parallel consumption. c. comparative advantage. d. relative distribution. Question Nebraska specializes in the production of corn and Maine specializes in the production of lobsters, therefore the two states could engage in trade that benefits both parties. This law of economics is known as a. supply and demand. b. parallel consumption. c. comparative advantage. d. relative distribution. Answer Country X and Country Y are the same size in terms of population, area, and capital stock. If both countries devote all of their efforts to producing widgets, Country X can produce 10 million widgets, while Country Y can produce 5 million. Based on the information given, Country X has a. a monopoly on the production of widgets. b. an absolute advantage in producing widgets. c. a comparative advantage in producing widgets. d. a lower opportunity cost in the production of widgets. Question Country X and Country Y are the same size in terms of population, area, and capital stock. If both countries devote all of their efforts to producing widgets, Country X can produce 10 million widgets, while Country Y can produce 5 million.
    [Show full text]
  • What Price Domestic Industry?
    What Price Domestic Industry? // an industry in a developing country can produce goods that are cheaper than the equivalent imports, should the government encourage that industry? The author says: "Not necessarily/' and suggests better criteria. George B, Baldwin F YOU ASK BUSINESSMEN whether they The doctrine of "comparative costs" is about I think governments should encourage indus- as important a piece of advice as economic tries that have a comparative advantage with theory has to offer governments which want to respect to their costs, and should discourage push economic development in sensible direc- those that hold a comparative disadvantage, tions. The advice applies to all sectors of the nine out of ten will say "yes." But if you then economy—agriculture, mining, industry, tour- ask them what they mean by an industry that ism, fishing, forestry, the whole lot. Here we has a "comparative advantage," nine out of will deal only with industry, the glamour sector ten will flunk the course. They will tell you of development and the one where the question of protection is most vigorously debated. What that governments should help those industries I want to do is to present a simple and straight- whose costs compare favorably with the cost of forward explanation of the doctrine of com- imports—"industries that have a comparative parative costs (or "comparative advantage"), advantage." That is the obvious answer, but to show its relevance for development policy it is also the wrong one. Even if you go among and decision making, and to translate the a gathering of economists and government theoretical concept into operational terms.
    [Show full text]