DOCSLIB.ORG

RETHINKING NEOCLASSICAL REALISM at THEORY'

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
RETHINKING NEOCLASSICAL REALISM at THEORY' International Studies Review (2020) 0,1–28 THE FORUM Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/isr/advance-article/doi/10.1093/isr/viaa018/5782294 by Bilkent University Library (BILK) user on 30 November 2020 FORUM: RETHINKING NEOCLASSICAL REALISM AT THEORY’S END G USTAV M EIBAUER London School of Economics and Political Science L INDE D ESMAELE Vrije Universiteit Brussel T UDOR O NEA Bilkent University N ICHOLAS K ITCHEN University of Surrey M ICHIEL F OULON ETH Zurich A LEXANDER R EICHWEIN University of Giessen AND J ENNIFER S TERLING-FOLKER University of Connecticut This forum presents a snapshot of the current state of neoclassical real- ist theorizing. Its contributors are self-identified neoclassical realists who delineate their version of neoclassical realism (NCR), its scope, object of analysis, and theoretical contribution. From the standpoint of NCR, they contribute to and reflect on the “end of IR theory” debate. NCR has come under criticism for its supposed lack of theoretical structure and alleged disregard for paradigmatic boundaries. This raises questions as to the na- ture of this (theoretical) beast. Is NCR a midrange, progressive research program? Can it formulate a grand theory informed by metatheoretical assumptions? Is it a reformulation of neorealism or classical realism or an eclectic mix of different paradigms? The forum contributors argue that NCR, in different variants, holds considerable promise to investigate for- eign policy, grand strategy and international politics. They interrogate the interaction of international and domestic politics and consider normative implications as well as the sources and cases of NCR beyond the West. In so Meibauer, Gustav et al. (2020) FORUM: RETHINKING NEOCLASSICAL REALISM AT THEORY’S END. International Studies Review, doi: 10.1093/isr/viaa018 © The Author(s) (2020). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Studies Association. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: [email protected] 2 Forum: Rethinking Neoclassical Realism doing, they speak to theorizing and the utility of the theoretical enterprise in IR more generally. Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/isr/advance-article/doi/10.1093/isr/viaa018/5782294 by Bilkent University Library (BILK) user on 30 November 2020 Keywords: foreign policy, international relations theory, neoclas- sical realism Introduction GUSTAV MEIBAUER London School of Economics and Political Science This forum presents a snapshot of the current state of neoclassical realist theorizing. Its contributors are self-identified neoclassical realists who delineate their version of neoclassical realism (NCR), its scope, object of analysis, and theoretical contribu- tion. Their contributions discuss theories of foreign policy, grand strategy, and in- ternational politics and outline how NCR can contribute to normative prescription and non-Western theorizing. In so doing, they speak to theorizing and the utility of the theoretical enterprise in IR more generally. The introduction of intervening variables has allowed neoclassical realists to explain state behavior beyond the long-term and average effects of systemic forces. Numerous authors employ NCR with such different intervening variables as strategic interaction (Onea 2012), regime type (Juneau 2015), extraction and mobilization capacity (Christensen 1996; Zakaria 1998; Taliaferro 2006), public opinion and media pressures (Steinsson 2017), culture and identity (Hadfield 2010; Giusti 2016; Smith 2016; Schweller 2018; N. R.), and perceptions, ideas, and beliefs (Wohlforth 1993; Dueck 2008; Kitchen 2010; Foulon 2015; He 2017; Meibauer 2020). Neoclassical realists have investigated core phenomena of the discipline, in- cluding grand strategy and systemic change (Taliaferro, Ripsman, and Lobell 2012; Taliaferro, Lobell, and Ripsman 2018). They have theorized the geostrategic en- vironment’s permissiveness, the ambiguity of threat, and the salience of structural modifiers (Ripsman, Taliaferro, and Lobell 2016). While many neoclassical realists have wanted to uphold, to varying degrees, commitments to “soft” positivism—that is, to generalizability, testability, and prediction—others have suggested more critical, reflexive variants (Toje and Kunz 2012; Gegout 2018; Gelot and Welz 2018). Not least because of this breadth, NCR has arguably become the “new orthodoxy” for realist scholars (Narizny 2017, 155). However, it has also invited criticism. Its crit- ics diagnose NCR with a lack of theoretical structure and “degenerative” theorizing (Legro and Moravcsik 1999; Walt 2002; Tang 2009; Narizny 2017). Some neoclassi- cal realists have engaged this critique (Christensen and Snyder 1997; Fiammenghi et al. 2018) or argued that better explanations are more important than paradig- matic purity (Taliaferro in: Feaver et al. 2000; Schweller 2003; Rathbun 2008, 295). Others have attempted to systematize the approach. In so doing, they have broad- ened the scope of inquiry to general patterns of state behavior and positioned NCR as a theory of international politics (Ripsman, Taliaferro, and Lobell 2016;also: Desmaele, Onea, Kitchen, forum). Here, NCR contributes new insights to an old debate (Elman 1996; Waltz 1996). These developments raise questions as to the nature of this (theoretical) beast. Is NCR a midrange, progressive research program? Can it formulate a grand theory informed by metatheoretical assumptions? Is it a reformulation of neorealism or classical realism or an eclectic mix of different paradigms? GUSTAV MEIBAUER ET AL.3 In asking where NCR fits in the discipline and where its contributions lie, it is necessary to delineate what one means by “the discipline” and the process of Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/isr/advance-article/doi/10.1093/isr/viaa018/5782294 by Bilkent University Library (BILK) user on 30 November 2020 theorizing. In recent years, IR scholars have questioned the role, processes, and power of theories and theorizing of international politics (Mearsheimer and Walt 2013; Zambernardi 2016; Grieco 2019). They have highlighted the assumptions, particularities, and flaws of supposedly mainstream frameworks. The process of the- orizing itself has come under scrutiny—for example, regarding how the discipline reproduces some voices and represses others (Tickner and Waever 2009; Shilliam 2010; Tickner 2013; Acharya 2016; Saideman 2018). The value of IR theories and theorizing have been challenged to the extent that scholars investigated whether this heralded “the end of International Relations theory” (Dunne, Hansen, and Wight 2013). They found that different ideas about and tensions surrounding the theoretical enterprise persist, which, rather than marking the end of IR theory, speak of “new possibilities and new directions of inquiry” (Grayson, Coward, and Oprisko 2016,1). Two themes emerge from this debate that help situate NCR within the discipline. The first involves the “acceptance of greater theoretical diversity” and the no longer “heated debate aimed at achieving theoretical hegemony” (Dunne, Hansen, and Wight 2013, 406). Indeed, diversity of (meta)theoretical perspective and analyti- cal method is conventionally perceived as positive. NCR constitutes an example of exactly the kind of theoretical proliferation, diversity, and pluralism that the “end of IR theory” debate seems to be about (Dunne, Hansen, and Wight 2013; Grieco 2019). This forum consciously builds on the suggestion that theoretical diversity helps “more comprehensive and multi-dimensional accounts of complex phenom- ena” (Dunne, Hansen, and Wight 2013, 416) by demonstrating how NCR, in smaller scale, maps onto the divides evident in the broader “end of IR theory” debate. Inevitably, what kind of theory NCR is, what its ontology and epistemology might be, and what this means for its scope and future contributions are debated among neoclassical realists themselves. The aim is to avoid a blind pluralism or “shallow eclecticism” that mainly produces mid-level theories with little regard for ontolog- ical and epistemological consistency (Guzzini 2013, 532). At the same time, the point of NCR cannot be simply to stake out a new position in a “theological debate” and retread old “paradigm wars,” fought with fervor but little result in decades past (Lake 2011, 465; Dunne, Hansen, and Wight 2013, 406). While neoclassical realists might share attributes that make them belong to a disciplinary “camp”—for exam- ple, common research interests or even methodologies (Sylvester 2013)—each of the forum contributors also delineates different NCR versions and contributions. Even within the framework, then, we find a diversity of ideas, scope conditions, and purposes of theory. Indeed, as highlighted by Kitchen (forum), new variables con- tinue to proliferate as neoclassical realists apply their theories to new cases and ob- jects of study. To avoid a descent into “cacophony” (Jackson and Nexon 2013, 543), how is such diversity best captured? How can theoretical progress be evaluated? The second theme emerging from the “end of IR theory” debate centers on the decline of theory development (the grand theorizing of old) and the rise of theory-testing (midrange theorizing involving hypothesis testing and correlation). This may represent a general “change in attitudes towards theory” (Dunne, Hansen, and Wight 2013,406;Oren 2016). NCR scholarship is often evaluated against theoretical standards that are shaped by midrange theory expectations—for example, demands for a unity of thought
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Doctorate in International Family and Community Studies 2 - Doctorate in International Family and Community Studies
    Doctorate in International Family and Community Studies 2 - Doctorate in International Family and Community Studies Doctorate in International Family and Community Studies Modern complex societies increasingly expect leaders to hold advanced degrees in order to bring so- phisticated research-informed analysis to bear on pressing issues in the public, private and civil society sectors. The PhD in International Family and Community Studies is being offered in the Balkans since 2012. By bringing a first-rate American doctoral program directly to the region, we hope to mobilize knowledge so as to increase the regional capacity for addressing important social issues and to do so at a highly competitive price and with minimal risk of “brain drain”. www.clemson.edu - 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS • Welcome Address • Program Overview • Why a Doctoral Program in the Balkans? • Why Choose this Doctoral Program? • Who is offering this Doctoral Degree? • Description of the Program • Curriculum • Course Descriptions • Faculty & Staff • Principal Faculty of IFNL • Adjunct Faculty of IFNL • Staff of IFNL • Admission Criteria • Application for Admission • Degree Requirements and Potential Waiver of Courses for Master’s Degree Students • Cost of Studies • Quality Assurance 4 - Doctorate in International Family and Community Studies WELCOME ADDRESS “Understanding family and community life is an important first step in improving social conditions. Consider continuing your journey with a doctorate in international family and commu- nity studies. Because a doctorate
    [Show full text]
  • International Civic and Citizenship Education Study
    International Civic and Citizenship Education Study Assessment Framework Wolfram Schulz Julian Fraillon John Ainley Bruno Losito David Kerr ICCS ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK 1 2 ICCS ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK International Civic and Citizenship Education Study Assessment Framework Wolfram Schulz Julian Fraillon John Ainley Bruno Losito David Kerr ICCS ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK 1 Copyright © 2008 International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, electrostatic, magnetic tape, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without permission in writing from the copyright holder. ISBN: 978-90-9023778-7 Copies of this publication can be obtained from: The IEA Secretariat Herengracht 487 1017 BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Telephone + 31 20 625 3625 Fax + 31 20 420 7136 Email: [email protected] Website: www.iea.nl The International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement, known as IEA, is an independent, international consortium of national research institutions and governmental research agencies, with headquarters in Amsterdam. Its primary purpose is to conduct large-scale comparative studies of educational achievement with the aim of gaining more in-depth understanding of the effects of policies and practices within and across systems of education. 2 ICCS ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK Contents Preface 5 Overview 7 Purpose of the study 7 Background to the study 7 Research questions,
    [Show full text]
  • 25 Universities with Global Studies Programs Or Programs of Similar
    25 UNIVERSITIES WITH GLOBAL STUDIES PROGRAMS OR PROGRAMS OF SIMILAR INTEREST *This list is not meant to be extensive but to provide you with a starting point when exploring your post-secondary options. What is a Global Studies Major? According to the The College Board: “Global studies majors are “global thinkers” in every sense. Drawing from fields as different as geography, music, political science, and ecology, they look at the connections between nations and peoples and the trends that shape our lives. And global studies majors don’t just think on a large scale. They may study how something like climate change can affect hundreds of nations, but they also consider its effects on their own backyard.” Potential Career Paths: Foreign Service/State Department; International business, including working for a domestic American corporation in their international operations, or working for a corporation abroad; Entrepreneurialism; International law; International development and sustainable development; International non-profit work or activism on environment, human rights, social justice, etc.; Journalism and other communications media; Education, especially teaching and administration at the high school level and above. Click here to see more about what you can do with a Global Studies Degree 1. BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY The International and Global Studies (IGS) Program is an interdisciplinary program that provides students with an opportunity to understand the complex processes of globalization that have so profoundly affected politics, economics, culture, society, the environment and many other facets of our lives. 2. BROWN UNIVERSITY: WATSON INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL STUDIES The Watson Institute is a community of scholars whose work aims to help us understand and address the world's great challenges, such as globalization, economic uncertainty, security threats, environmental degradation, and poverty.
    [Show full text]
  • International Studies (INST) 1
    International Studies (INST) 1 ANTH 251 — Informal Economies Course count: 1 INTERNATIONAL STUDIES The UN reports that 2/3 of the global workforce operates in the "informal economy." This course develops an anthropological approach to that (INST) fact. Our foundation is the literature on the informal economy in Africa and other parts of the global south, but we will also explore economic AFST 260 — Black Europe Course count: 1 processes closer to home. Topics include: the origin, development, and Although often considered homogenously white, Europe's population is use of the "informal economy" concept, precarious livelihoods, micro- and always has been racially diverse. This diversity is the culmination credit and "bottom of the pyramid" ventures, informal networks, illicit of centuries of colonialist interventions around the globe, particularly trade, smuggling, black markets, and organized crime. in Africa and the West Indies. This course will explore the history and contemporary reality of this population diversity, with a particular focus GPA units: 1 on the African diaspora in Europe. Beginning with Europe's simultaneous Common Area: Cross-Cultural Studies, Social Science expulsion of Jews and Muslims and "discovery" of Caribbean islands ANTH 253 — Gender & Development Course count: 1 in 1492, the students will trace Europe's colonial history in Africa and Is there any validity to the claim that women in the Global South the West Indies that ultimately resulted in return migration of current have largely been "left out", "marginalized"
    [Show full text]
  • International Studies
    REQUIREMENTS FOR THE BACHELOR OF ARTS IN INTERNATIONAL AND AREA STUDIES COLLEGE OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES THE UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA For Students Entering the Minimum Credit Hours and Grade Point Averages Required International Studies Oklahoma State System for Total Hours — 120 Upper-Division Within Total 48 Higher Education: Major Hours — 30 Upper-Division Within Major 18 B605 Grade Point Averages: Summer 2014 through Overall: Combined OU/Transfer - 2.00 OU - 2.00 Spring 2015 Bachelor of Arts in Major GPA (30 hours; does not include Major Support): 2.50 International & Area Studies 48 Upper-Division Hours REQUIRED OU encourages students to complete at least 30 hours of applicable coursework each year to have the opportunity to graduate in four years. GENERAL EDUCATION AND COLLEGE Some courses required for the major may also fulfill University General REQUIREMENTS Courses graded P/NP will not apply. Education and/or College of International Studies Requirements Courses for fulfillment of General Education and College of International Studies re- MAJOR REQUIREMENTS MAJOR REQUIREMENTS - continued quirements must be from the approved General Education course list published in the Class Schedule or at The major requires 30 hours, 18 of which must be upper-division, and a 2.50 GPA. http://www.ou.edu/content/gened/courses.html I. International Politics (6 hours) IV. International Economics (3 hours) ECON 4713, Latin American Econ. Dev. University-Wide General Education (minimum 40 hours) and IAS 3013, International Law IAS 3033, International Human Rights ECON 4733, Econ. Dev. in the Middle East College of International Studies Requirements Core IAS 3043, Global Security ECON 4853, World Economic Dev.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Theory and Jurisprudence in Gentili's De Iure Belli
    INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL LAW AND JUSTICE NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW International Law and Justice Working Papers IILJ Working Paper 2005/15 History and Theory of International Law Series Political Theory and Jurisprudence in Gentili’s De Iure Belli. The great debate between ‘theological’ and ‘humanist’ perspectives from Vitoria to Grotius Diego Panizza University of Padua Faculty Director: Benedict Kingsbury Program in the History and Theory of International Law Co-Directors: Philip Alston and J.H.H. Weiler Directors: Benedict Kingsbury and Martti Koskenniemi Executive Director: Simon Chesterman Institute for International Law and Justice Faculty Advisory Committee: New York University School of Law Philip Alston, Kevin Davis, David Golove, Benedict Kingsbury 40 Washington Square South, VH 314 Martti Koskenniemi, Mattias Kumm, Linda Silberman, New York, NY 10012 Richard Stewart, J.H.H. Weiler, Katrina Wyman Website: www.iilj.org All rights reserved. No part of this paper may be reproduced in any form without permission of the author. ISSN: 1552-6275 © Diego Panizza New York University School of Law New York, NY 10012 U.S.A. Cite as: IILJ Working Paper 2005/15 (History and Theory of International Law Series) (www.iilj.org) Prof. Diego Panizza Department of International Studies University of Padua Political Theory and Jurisprudence in Gentili’s De Iure Belli. The great debate between ‘theological’ and ‘humanist’ perspectives from Vitoria to Grotius Summary 1. Introduction – 2. War as ‘duel” vs. war as ‘execution of justice’ – 3. Bilateral justice of war vs. ‘invincible ignorance’ – 4. Pre-emptive self-defence vs. necessary self-defence – 5. The making of peace: restitution-punishment vs.
    [Show full text]
  • International Law
    14 International Law Beth Simmons The study of international law and interna- foreshadowed the current sharp upswing in tional relations has flourished in the past interest in international law. Not only are decade. This should hardly be surprising. scholars increasingly interested in the grow- These two disciplines have closely entwined ing “legalization” of international affairs, historical roots in the traditional study of they are making tremendous strides in theo- interstate relations and diplomacy (Jeffery rizing and documenting the consequences of 2006). The role of international law in inter- international legal norms and agreements for national relations has for a least a century our understanding of international affairs been at the heart of some of the most impor- more generally. This has led to new fields of tant debates in international relations schol- inquiry in international relations that were arship. Something of an intellectual wedge barely apparent two decades ago. was driven between these two disciplines The first section of this essay defines a few when the social sciences and international key terms and provides some historical back- relations in particular took a behavioralist ground on the relationship between interna- turn in the 1940s and 1950s. The normative tional law and international relations. The and doctrinal approach of many legal schol- second section discusses the major theoreti- ars seemed to have little intersection with the cal approaches, from those that highlight increasingly social scientific concerns of material incentives to those that rest on more international relations scholars to explain, ideational foundations. The third section interpret, and increasingly to predict interna- discusses international law development – tional politics.
    [Show full text]
  • Opportunities and Challenges for Political Science Research a Roundtable
    Exploring International Law: Opportunities and Challenges for Political Science Research A Roundtable Charlotte Ku, Paul F. Diehl, Beth A. Simmons, Dorinda G. Dallmeyer, and Harold K. Jacobson Introduction Charlotte Ku etween 1990 and 1999, only one lead article on international law was published in the American Political Science Review. Moreover, fewer Bthan 10 percent of the articles published in the International Studies Quarterly touched on a subject related to international law. In a decade when questions of restructuring world order dominated, why has international law not figured in the search for answers? The short essays that follow explain why and, in doing so, they may point the way to opportunities for political science research. The essays grew out of a roundtable organized for the annual meeting of the American Political Sci- ence Association in 1999. The roundtable was part of a series that the American Society of International Law organized to address issues arising from teaching or researching international law within the framework of political science and international relations. Why does work in international relations and political science, which focuses on problems of systemwide change, compliance, and effectiveness of norms and regulations, ignore international law? The question seems simple for an international lawyer because these issues are at the heart of scholarship in inter- national law. The question recently has become more compelling as those with © 2001 International Studies Association Published by Blackwell Publishers, 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148, USA, and 108 Cowley Road, Oxford OX4 1JF, UK. 4 Ku et al. principal training in law discover the value of the method and broad framework of political science.
    [Show full text]
  • Economics Distribution
    INTERNATIONAL STUDIES EMPHASIS Sample Discipline Emphasis: Int. Studies - Economics 36 credits minimum Please note that the courses below are just EXAMPLES . Any of the courses beyond the required courses may be substituted by courses in either list 2 or 3, as appropriate. Required Courses (6 credits) _____ 59-205 Contemporary International Issues (Fall only) _____ 59-402 Seminar in International Studies (Spring only) Introductory International Studies Courses (0-9 credits) Other introductory courses giving credit in the International Studies major can be found on the International Studies website, under Int. Studies Requirements. _____ 84-115 International Politics _____ 36 -206 Micro-Economics _____ 36 -207 Macro-Economics Discipline Emphasis (15 credits) Choose 15 credits from upper-level “Economics” courses in List 2. Please note that this is an example of what an International Studies – Economics emphasis may look like. 36 - 319 Economics of Least Developed Countries Dept: Economics 36 - 420 International Finance and Trade Dept: Economics 36 - 436 Comparative Economic Systems Dept: Economics 36 - 410 International Capital Markets Dept: Economics 36 - 309 Marxian Economics ___ Dept: Economics Electives (15 credits) Choose between 6-12 credits from any upper-level courses in List 2 , as necessary to complete the major, including the disciplinary requirement (the student must take courses from at least four different disciplines) 59 - 341 Multinational Corporations Dept: International Studies 84 - 376 Studies on War and Peace Dept: Political Science 50 - 311 Economic Geography Dept: Geography ____-______ NOTE: Courses must be chosen from at least four participating departments off of course list two. This includes the chosen area of emphasis.
    [Show full text]
  • International Studies (INTS) 1
    International Studies (INTS) 1 INTERNATIONAL STUDIES (INTS) INTS 3665 Comparative State Building (4 Credits) Since the fall of the Berlin Wall, countries in East Central Europe have experienced some twenty-five years of fascinating political, economic, and social change as they have tried to rebuild themselves, undergone democratization, and transitioned to a free market. But the legacies of the region’s dramatic and often tragic encounters with war and ideology in the 20th and 19th centuries are still shaping how East Central European societies respond to the new horizons following the collapse of the Soviet bloc. This course is designed as an overview and analysis of the processes of state- building in East Central Europe from the eve of imperial independence in the late 19th century to the present day. We will learn about the condition of the states and nations of East Central Europe before WWI and how they embarked on their nation-building projects after the demise of the foreign empires, the Ottoman, the Austro-Hungarian, and the Russian, that had ruled the region for 500 years. We will then discuss the onset of yet another foreign mode of control – communism – and we will learn how communist reality and Soviet hegemony was lived by the people of Poland, Hungary, Czechoslovakia, Serbia, East Germany, Romania, and Bulgaria for over forty years. After the initial wave of optimism after independence, the political chaos and economic backwardness of the interwar period 1918-1939; after the resistance, collaboration and murder of the Second World War; after the terror and senselessness of Stalinism; after the exhilaration and disappointment of the Hungarian Revolution in 1956, of the Prague Spring in 1968, and of Solidarity in Poland in 1981; after the gray monotony of decaying communism and the lonely voices of dissidents, we will come to the triumphant revolutions of 1989 and the challenges of the post-communist transition.
    [Show full text]
  • 111111.6 11111 I.4
    111111.6 11111 I.4 MICROCOPY RESOLUTION- TEST CHART _ NATIONALBUREAUOfp,STANIIADB1196}A DOCUMENT RESUME ED 079 205 SO 006 007 AUTHOR Becker, James M.; Mehlinger, Howard D. TITLE International Dimensions in the Social Studies. 38th Yearbook. INSTITUTION National Council for the Social Studies, Washington, D.C. PUB DATE 68 NOTE 346p. AVAILABLE FROMNational Council for the Social Studies, 1201 Sixteenth St., N.W, Washington, D.C..20036; Paperbound $4.50, Clothbound $5.50 EDRS PRICE MF-$0.65 HC Not Available from EDRS. DESCRIPTORS Area Studies; Conceptual Schemes; Cross Cultural Studies; Curriculum Development; Educational Change; Educational Needs; *Foreign Relations; *International Education; International Law; International Organizations; *Social Studies; Teaching Techniques; *World Affairs; Yearbooks ABSTRACT This thirty-eighth yearbook provides a framework for the teaching of international education and relates recent concepts and ideas in the international studies field which are applicable to the teaching of social studies. A number of educators and social scientists contributed to a series of chapters comprised in four sect =ions ,of the volume.. Each of the major sections deals with a different but related area of international affairs education.. Section I suggests ways of organizing materials around the emerging international society and indicates complexities of the contemporary world that students need to be acquainted with in order to live intelligently in a changing world. Offering some reflections about the field of international studies in general and world law and area studies in particular, Part II is designed to assist the teacher in the job of selecting and evaluating new areas of study in international affairs.
    [Show full text]
  • International Studies Handbook for Majors
    Handbook for Majors TABLE OF CONTENTS International Affairs Center Staff ………………………………………………3 The International Studies Major ……………………………………………….4 Major Requirements ……………………………………………….5 Minor in International Studies ……………………………………………….6 Description of Core Courses ……………………………………………….6-7 Study Abroad ……………………………………………….7 Major Electives ……………………………………………….8-9 Departmental Honors ……………………………………………….10 Para Curricular Credit ……………………………………………….10 Cross Registration ……………………………………………….10 Course Schedule ……………………………………………….11 Graduate Studies ……………………………………………….12-13 International Careers ……………………………………………….14 Major Checklist ……………………………………………….15 Scholarships ……………………………………………….16 Program and Activities ……………………………………………….16 External Programs and Fellowships ……………………………………………….17 2 The major is housed in the International Affairs Center. The Center staff includes: Jeanne T. Meadows, Ph.D. Director and Chair, International Studies Office: Cosby, 4th floor, Room 404 404-270-5548 (office) 404/270-5532 (fax) E-mail: [email protected] Ms. Zadie R. Long Senior Administrative Assistant 404-270-5546 404-270-5532 E-mail: [email protected] Meadows at Teotihuacan, Mexico 3 The International Studies Major International Studies is an interdisciplinary field of inquiry that focuses on patterns of interaction in the global community relating to the human condition. The international studies major embarks on a journey that provides comprehensive understanding of the global system from its cultural context to the role of geo-political and geo-economic forces that determine its nature The course of study is heavily concentrated in the areas of sociology, anthropology, political science, economics, geography, and history. The major is consistent with the mission of the college to promote academic excellence and enhance leadership as well as to help students “to appreciate the many cultures of the world and commit to positive social change.” This charge suggests that students must be encouraged to develop skills to function in a global environment.
    [Show full text]