Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council Local Plan Habitat Regulations Assessment: Stage 1 (Air Quality Screening)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council Local Plan Habitat Regulations Assessment: Stage 1 (Air Quality Screening) Appendix4 Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council Local Plan Habitat Regulations Assessment: Stage 1 (Air Quality Screening) July 2018 Tonbridge & Malling Borough Council Mott MacDonald Victory House Trafalgar Place Brighton BN1 4FY United Kingdom T +44 (0)1273 365000 F +44 (0)1273 365100 mottmac.com Tonbridge & Malling Borough Council Gibson Building Tonbridge and Malling Gibson Drive 391898 2 B Kings Hill Borough TMBC HRA StageCouncil 1 Local Plan West Malling Mott MacDonald ME19 4LZ Habitat Regulations Assessment: Stage 1 (Air Quality Screening) July 2018 Mott MacDonald Limited. Registered in England and Wales no. 1243967. Registered office: Mott MacDonald House, 8-10 Sydenham Road, Croydon CR0 2EE, Tonbridge & Malling Borough Council United Kingdom Mott MacDonald | Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council Local Plan Habitat Regulations Assessment: Stage 1 (Air Quality Screening) Issue and Revision Record Revision Date Originator Checker Approver Description A May S. Arora C. Mills C. Mills Draft for comment 2018 J. Brookes B July S. Arora J. Brookes C. Mills Second issue 2018 Document reference: 391898 | 2 | B Information class: Standard This document is issued for the party which commissioned it and for specific purposes connected with the above- captioned project only. It should not be relied upon by any other party or used for any other purpose. We accept no responsibility for the consequences of this document being relied upon by any other party, or being used for any other purpose, or containing any error or omission which is due to an error or omission in data supplied to us by other parties. This document contains confidential information and proprietary intellectual property. It should not be shown to other parties without consent from us and from the party which commissioned it. This R eport has been prepar ed sol el y for use by the party which commissi oned it (the 'Client') in connection with the capti oned pr oject. It shoul d not be used for any other purpose. N o person other than the Client or any party who has expr essl y agreed terms of reli ance with us (the 'Recipi ent(s)') may r el y on the content, infor mation or any views expr essed in the R eport. T his R eport is confi denti al and contains pr opri etary intell ectual pr operty and we accept no duty of car e, r esponsibility or li ability to any other recipi ent of this R eport. N o repr esentati on, warranty or undertaking, express or i mplied, is made and no responsi bility or liability is accepted by us to any party other than the Client or any Reci pient(s), as to the accuracy or completeness of the i nfor mati on contai ned i n this R eport. F or the avoi dance of doubt thi s Report does n ot i n any way pur port to i nclude any legal, insurance or fi nanci al advice or opi nion. We disclai m all and any liability whether arising i n tort, contr act or other wise which we might otherwise have to any party o ther than the Cli ent or the Reci pient(s), in respect of this Report, or any infor mation contained in it. We accept no responsi bility for any error or omissi on in the Report which is due to an error or omissi on in data, i nfor mation or statements supplied to us by other parti es i ncludi ng the Cli ent (the 'Data'). We have not independentl y verified the D ata or other wise exami ned i t to deter mi ne the accuracy, completeness, sufficienc y for any purpose or feasi bility for any particular outcome incl uding fi nanci al. Forecasts presented i n this document were pr epared usi ng the Data and the Repor t is dependent or based on the D ata. Inevitabl y, some of the assumptions used to develop the for ecasts will not be realised and unantici pated events and circumstances may occur. C onsequentl y, we do not guarantee or warrant the conclusions contained in the R eport as ther e are li kel y to be differences between the forecasts and the actual results and those differ ences may be material. While we consi der that the infor mation and opini ons given in this R eport are sound all parti es must rel y on their own skill and judgement when making use of it. Infor mation and opi nions ar e current onl y as of the date of the Report and we accept no responsi bility for updati ng such infor mation or opi nion. It shoul d, therefor e, not be assumed that any such infor mati on or opi nion conti nues to be accurate subsequent to the date of the Report. U nder no circumstances may this Rep ort or any extract or summar y thereof be used i n connecti on with any public or pri vate securities offeri ng incl udi ng any related memor andum or pr ospectus for any securiti es offering or stock exchange listi ng or announcement. By acceptance of this Repor t you agree to be bound by this disclai mer. T his disclai mer and any issues, disputes or cl ai ms arising out of or in connection with it ( whether contractual or non-contractual i n natur e such as cl ai ms i n tort, from br each of statute or regul ati on or otherwise) shall be governed by, and co nstr ued i n accordance with, the laws of Engl and and Wales to the exclusion of all conflict of l aws principles and r ules. All disputes or clai ms arising out of or r elati ng to this discl ai mer shall be subject to the exclusi ve jurisdicti on of the English and Welsh courts to which the parties irrevocabl y submit. 391898 | 2 | B | July 2018 TMBC HRA Stage 1 Mott MacDonald | Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council Local Plan Habitat Regulations Assessment: Stage 1 (Air Quality Screening) Contents Executive summary 1 1 Introduction 4 2 Background 6 3 Baseline conditions 17 4 Assessment approach 24 5 Air quality impacts of new development 31 6 Options for minimising air quality impacts from new development 35 7 Conclusions 37 Appendices 38 A. Local Plan strategy phasing 39 B. Traffic data 41 C. Model verification 46 391898 | 2 | B | July 2018 TMBC HRA Stage 1 Mott MacDonald | Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council Local Plan 1 Habitat Regulations Assessment: Stage 1 (Air Quality Screening) Executive summary Tonbridge & Malling Borough Council (TMBC) is in the process of preparing a new Local Plan with a time horizon of 2031. An assessment has been undertaken to provide an evidence base for air quality impacts of the TMBC Local Plan on sensitive designated habitats, in the context of the European Union Habitat Regulations. The assessment has considered whether the development of five proposed strategic development sites, in combination with planned growth in neighbouring authorities, would result in significant impacts on designated ecological sites during the lifetime of the emerging Local Plan up to 2031. The process of determining whether plans may adversely affect a designated site requires a formal assessment of the implications of any new plans or projects. This process is collectively described as the habitat regulations assessment (HRA). There are three HRA Stages: ● Stage 1. Likely significant effects (evidence gathering and screening) (the stage described in this document) ● Stage 2. Appropriate Assessment and ascertaining the effect on site integrity (necessary if there are found to be likely significant effects) ● Stage 3. Mitigation measures and alternative solutions (required when an option has been found to have adverse effects on the integrity of the site). The first stage within the HRA process consists of a screening exercise which identifies the likely significant effects from the plan or project on the designated sites and qualifying features. This document summarises the approach and outcomes of the stage 1 screening assessment under TMBC’s Local Plan HRA process. The focus of the assessment is on determining the air quality impacts of the proposed development through dispersion modelling. Results are interpreted by a qualified ecology specialist, in the context of the existing condition of the ecological sites under consideration, to determine whether significant effects are likely to occur or not. This report therefore primarily presents the methodology and results of the dispersion modelling exercise. Discussion of the ecology impacts is presented following interpretation of air quality results, to provide a conclusion on whether it is necessary to proceed to the next assessment stage (Appropriate Assessment), which naturally has a greater focus on the detailed ecological impacts. The assessment involved dispersion modelling of traffic impacts associated with the proposed TMBC Local Plan, in combination with other development in neighbouring authorities, at two special areas of conservation (SACs) within Tonbridge and Malling: ● Peter’s Pit SAC, designated for Triturus cristatus (Great crested newt) ● North Downs Woodland SAC, designated for yew-dominated woodland, beech forests on neutral to rich soils, and dry grasslands and scrublands on chalk or limestone. Growth scenarios in neighbouring districts, for example committed development and neighbouring authorities’ local plans, have been accounted for in the traffic data used within this assessment by using information from the Department for Transport (DfT) TEMPro database, which takes into account planned (ie draft) and adopted strategic development plans across districts to estimate projected numbers of jobs and households in future years. The traffic growth factors calculated in TEMPro therefore account for the cumulative impacts of growth both within TMBC and within neighbouring districts.
Recommended publications
  • Hawkhurst the Moor Highgate and All Saints Church Iddenden Green (Sawyers Green) Hawkhurst Conservation Areas Appraisal
    Conservation Areas Appraisal Hawkhurst The Moor Highgate and All Saints Church Iddenden Green (Sawyers Green) Hawkhurst Conservation Areas Appraisal The Moor Highgate and All Saints Church Iddenden Green (Sawyers Green) Tunbridge Wells Borough Council in Partnership with Hawkhurst Parish Council and other local representatives N G Eveleigh BA, MRTPI Planning and Building Control Services Manager Tunbridge Wells Borough Council Town Hall, Royal Tunbridge Wells, Kent TN1 1RS September 1999 Printed on environmentally friendly paper Acknowledgements The Borough Council would like to thank Hawkhurst Parish Council and other local representatives for their participation in the preparation of this guidance Contents Section Page 1 Introduction 1 2 Policy Background 3 3 Perceptions of Hawkhurst 10 4 The Evolution of Hawkhurst 11 5 The Evolution and Form of The Moor 12 Pre-1400 12 1400 – 1800 12 1800 – 1950’s 13 1950’s – Present Day 13 6 Character Appraisal for The Moor 14 Context 14 Approaches to the Village 14 Eastern Area 14 North Western Area 18 7 Summary of Elements that Contribute to The Moor Conservation 22 Area’s Special Character 8 Summary of Elements that Detract from The Moor Conservation 24 Area’s Special Character and Opportunities for Enhancement 9 The Evolution and Form of Highgate and All Saints Church 26 Pre-16th Century 26 1500 – 1800 26 Nineteenth Century 26 Twentieth Century 27 10 Character Appraisal for Highgate and All Saints Church 28 Context 28 Approaches to the Village 28 Eastern Approach – Rye Road 28 Western Approach
    [Show full text]
  • Neighbourhood Plan
    STAPLEHURST NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN FINAL PLAN 2016 — 2031 MADE 7TH DECEMBER 2016 Staplehurst Parish Council STAPLEHURST NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN FINAL PLAN Made 7th December 2016 This plan has been prepared by: Staplehurst Parish Council, The Parish Office, Village Centre, High Street, Staplehurst, Kent, TN12 0BJ. Digital copies of this document can be downloaded from: www.staplehurstvillage.org.uk www.maidstone.gov.uk / 2 Staplehurst Parish Council / December 2016 / Final Plan / 3 BUILDING A STAPLEHURST FIT FOR THE FUTURE PLAN PERIOD 2016 — 2031 / Staplehurst Parish Council / Neighbourhood Plan / 4 doc. ref: 099_Q_161207_Made-Plan Feria Urbanism is a planning and design studio that specialises in neighbourhood strategies, public participation and community engagement. Established in 2007, we have been involved in a diverse range of projects across the UK and have developed key skills in organising community engagement events to inform excellent planning and design. Contact for further information Richard Eastham | Feria Urbanism | www.feria-urbanism.eu + 44 (0) 7816 299 909 | + 44 (0) 1202 548 676 All maps within this document are reproduced from the Ordnance Survey mapping with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationary Office. © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution and civil proceedings. The Maidstone Borough Council Licence No. 100019636, 2011. Drawings and plans shown are preliminary design studies only and are subject to information available at the time. They are
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix B: Employment and Mixed Use Site Assessments
    SHEDLAA Appendix B: Employment and mixed use site assessments 1. SITE INFORMATION Reference Number ED-1 Site name/address West of Barradale Farm, Maidstone Road Landowner Pent Ltd Agent Howard Courtley, Courtley Consultants Greenfield/PDL Greenfield Proposed uses (sqm) Approximately 5500 sqm of employment use B1b/c B2 and B8 Site area (ha) 1.9 Is the site urban, adjacent Rural to urban, rural settlement or rural Site origin (e.g. Call for Call for Sites Sites) 2. SITE ASSESSMENT/SUITABILITY Site description (including Barradale Farm is located approximately 1.5km north of topography and surrounding Headcorn Village Centre. It is in the Low Weald Special land uses) Landscape Area MBWLP policy ENV34. The proposed site is located immediately to the west (rear of) the existing Barradale Farm complex, it is currently an open field bounded to the west and north by trees and hedgerows. Barradale Farm was formerly an intensive egg production unit and the buildings have now been converted to other uses (9 units). One unit is in use for the sale and repair of agricultural machinery, 4 units are occupied by Barradale Eggs, a Self- storage unit, a garage/workshop for Streamline coaches/taxis, a printing business (Print Big) and Foreman’s Emporium. The complex of buildings is very visible from the A274. The site itself is relatively flat. There is extensive concrete hardstanding around the units which extends to the rear. The re is an existing pond linked to a ditch located to the rear of the Print and Streamline units. Land to the north of the site rises to a mini ridge which runs east-west.
    [Show full text]
  • (Public Pack)Agenda Document for Planning Committee, 30/11/2017 18:00
    PLANNING COMMITTEE MEETING Date: Thursday 30 November 2017 Time: 6.00 p.m. Venue: Town Hall, High Street, Maidstone Membership: Councillors Boughton, Clark, Cox, English (Chairman), Harwood, Munford, Powell, Prendergast, Round (Vice-Chairman), Spooner, Mrs Stockell and Vizzard AGENDA Page No. 1. Apologies for Absence 2. Notification of Substitute Members 3. Notification of Visiting Members 4. Items withdrawn from the Agenda 5. Date of Adjourned Meeting - 7 December 2017 6. Any business the Chairman regards as urgent including the urgent update report as it relates to matters to be considered at the meeting 7. Disclosures by Members and Officers 8. Disclosures of lobbying 9. To consider whether any items should be taken in private because of the possible disclosure of exempt information. 10. Minutes of the meeting held on 9 November 2017 adjourned to 1 - 8 16 November 2017 - Minutes of the adjourned meeting to follow 11. Presentation of Petitions (if any) 12. Reference from the Policy and Resources Committee - Budget 9 Monitoring - Development Control Appeals 13. Deferred Items 10 Issued on 22 November 2017 Continued Over/: Alison Broom, Chief Executive 14. 16/505401 - Vicarage Field At Wares Farm, Linton Hill, Linton, 11 - 28 Kent 15. 16/506436 - The Green Barn, Water Lane, Hunton, Kent 29 - 39 16. 16/507035 - Gibbs Hill Farm, Grigg Lane, Headcorn, Kent 40 - 62 17. 17/500984 - Land Between Ringleside & Ringles Gate, Grigg 63 - 72 Lane, Headcorn, Kent 18. 17/502331 - Land At Woodcut Farm, Ashford Road, 73 - 115 Hollingbourne, Kent 19. 17/503043 - Land South Of Avery Lane And Land South Of 116 - 135 Sutton Road, Otham, Kent 20.
    [Show full text]
  • 20161222 Interim Findings on Maidstone Borough Local Plan
    INTERIM FINDINGS FROM THE EXAMINATION OF THE MAIDSTONE BOROUGH LOCAL PLAN 22 December 2016 Robert Mellor BSc DipTRP DipDesBEnv DMS MRICS MRTPI An Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government The scope of these findings This paper has been produced to address a number of main matters which have been discussed at examination hearings to indicate where main modifications may or may not be required to make the Plan sound. It does not cover every matter but it provides a broad overview. It is also intended to assist in identifying where further work may be needed to support an update of the proposed changes that have already been prepared by the Council and which will form the basis of draft main modifications to the Plan (to be supported by revised sustainability appraisal) which would then be subject to public consultation. Such main modifications are also likely to include additional and typically more detailed matters which have previously been the subject of changes proposed by Maidstone Borough Council. These have been the subject of discussion at Examination hearings. These are interim findings only. Final and fuller conclusions on the matters and issues referred to below will be set out in the Final Report at the end of the Examination process. Matter 1: Duty to Cooperate Issue – Whether the Local Planning Authority and other relevant persons have complied with the Duty to Cooperate? 1. S33A of the P&CPA sets out a statutory ‘Duty to Cooperate’ (DtC) which here applies to Maidstone BC and other local planning authorities, to Kent County Council, and to other persons prescribed by Regulation 4 of the Town and Country Planning (Local Planning) England Regulations 2012 (the Regulations).
    [Show full text]
  • Sissinghurst and Frittenden
    point your feet on a new path Sissinghurst and Frittenden Distance: 16 km=10 miles easy-to-moderate walking Region: Kent Date written: 11-jun-2014 Author: Malinovka Last update: 19-may-2021 Refreshments: Sissinghurst, Frittenden Maps: Explorer 136 (The Weald) and 137 (Ashford) but the maps in this guide should be sufficient Problems, changes? We depend on your feedback: [email protected] Public rights are restricted to printing, copying or distributing this document exactly as seen here, complete and without any cutting or editing. See Principles on main webpage. Villages, historic house and garden, woodland In Brief This is an extraordinary walk through a famous corner of Kent but where the footpaths are almost unknown. Apart from in the world-renowned garden and the villages, it is quite likely that you will not meet another person. The route navigates you carefully through Brewer's Wood, as though on a secret quest into a neglected and awe-inspiring forest. A highlight of the walk is Sissinghurst Castle and an optional visit to the famous garden created by Vita Sackville-West. Two excellent pubs and a café will be found en route . There are nettles and brambles on this walk and long trousers are definitely essential. In high summer Knoxbridge the tall grass can be a little taxing Frittenden before the hay harvest and because the paths are so under-used you may need to stamp down the undergrowth in one or two places, where a stick is a great asset. There is not too much mud and strong walking shoes or Brewer's Wood trainers will be fine in the drier months.
    [Show full text]
  • Staplehurst Neighbourhood Plan Review Group
    Document Amended 14 January 2020 File: MBC Call for Sites-NPRG Information STAPLEHURST NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN REVIEW GROUP COMMENTS ON THE RESULTS OF MAIDSTONE BOROUGH COUNCIL’S CALL FOR SITES FOR HOUSING AND COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT INTRODUCTION Staplehurst Neighbourhood Plan, made in December, 2016, describes how the countryside informs the village setting and how the proposed new housing should create an integrated framework to manage change. Policy PW1 – Access and Movement, acknowledges the rural character of the village and encourages more choice of routes throughout the parish to reduce traffic congestion on the A229 and Marden and Headcorn roads. The issues relating to drainage infrastructure have not been resolved with the housing developments currently under construction and cannot continue to be ignored. Policy PW2 states that future development should be assessed in terms of the impact such development would have upon the visual setting and landscape features as well as the biodiversity of the area. There is a presumption against development outside the village envelope. Neighbourhood Plan Objectives speak of networked footpaths with connected streets and lanes, improved cycle routes and improved pedestrian access. There should be safeguards for the green and rural feel of Staplehurst. There has been no benefit of the Community Infrastructure Levy for Staplehurst. Staplehurst Neighbourhood Plan Review Group comprises parish and borough councillors and residents tasked with keeping the Staplehurst Neighbourhood Plan, 2016 under review. As part of the Maidstone Borough Council’s (MBC) process of drafting a new Local Plan, landowners and speculators were invited to submit sites for consideration for housing and commercial development. A total of 31 sites were offered within Staplehurst parish and these were discussed by the Group at their meeting on 4th December 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • 060109/Eap001 - E1
    EASTERN AREA PLANNING COMMITTEE Monday 9 January 2006 at 4.30 pm Planning Applications likely to be considered Members of the Eastern Area Planning Committee will decide the following applications. You may attend the Committee Meeting and put your views to the Councillors. A copy of "Your Right to Speak at Planning Meetings" is available on our website or from our Planning Reception. PAGE APPLICATION DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION DECISION TW/05/02608 (A) Removal of existing single storey extensions, and 1 – 5 erection of part single storey/part two storey extension. (B) Erection of replacement detached garage. (C) Replacement door canopy. My Ladys Cottage, The Common, SISSINGHURST TW/05/02609 (A) Listed Building Consent – Removal of existing single 6 – 8 storey extensions, and erection of part single storey/part two storey extension. (B) Internal alterations. (C) Replacement door canopy. My Ladys Cottage, The Common, SISSINGHURST TW/05/02977 Erection of a detached house. 9 – 14 Plot Adjoining, Steeple House, Rogers Rough Road, KILNDOWN TW/05/02804 Two storey extension. 15 – 19 Cresslands Farm, Knoxbridge, FRITTENDEN TW/05/2892 Extension to front elevation. 20 – 24 Twin Gables, Bedgebury Road, GOUDHURST TW/05/02889 Two storey side extension, single storey alterations. 25 - 28 Red Cottage, Rye Road, HAWKHURST 060109/EAP001 - E1 - EASTERN AREA PLANNING COMMITTEE Monday 9 January 2006 REPORT OF THE HEAD OF PLANNING SERVICES PLANNING APPLICATIONS FOR CONSIDERATION APPLICANT REFERENCE LOCATION PROPOSAL CONTACT ADDRESS DATE VALID GRID REFERENCE DATE OF APPLICATION MR & MRS N HAMPSHIRE TW/05/02608 My Ladys Cottage (A) Removal of existing (C J Andrews The Common single storey extensions, 3 March Cottages SISSINGHURST and erection of part Mill Lane SI single storey/part two Frittenden storey extension.
    [Show full text]
  • Staplehurst Neighbourhood Plan
    STAPLEHURST NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN REFERENDUM PLAN 2016 — 2031 SEPTEMBER 2016 Staplehurst Parish Council STAPLEHURST NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN FINAL PLAN September 2016 This plan has been prepared by: Staplehurst Parish Council, The Parish Office, Village Centre, High Street, Staplehurst, Kent, TN12 0BJ. Digital copies of this document can be downloaded from: www.staplehurstvillage.org.uk www.maidstone.gov.uk / 2 Staplehurst Parish Council / September 2016 / Referendum Plan / 3 BUILDING A STAPLEHURST FIT FOR THE FUTURE PLAN PERIOD 2016 — 2031 / Staplehurst Parish Council / Neighbourhood Plan / 4 doc. ref: 099_Q_160922_Referendum-Plan_FINAL Feria Urbanism is a planning and design studio that specialises in neighbourhood strategies, public participation and community engagement. Established in 2007, we have been involved in a diverse range of projects across the UK and have developed key skills in organising community engagement events to inform excellent planning and design. Contact for further information Richard Eastham | Feria Urbanism | www.feria-urbanism.eu + 44 (0) 7816 299 909 | + 44 (0) 1202 548 676 All maps within this document are reproduced from the Ordnance Survey mapping with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationary Office. © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution and civil proceedings. The Maidstone Borough Council Licence No. 100019636, 2011. Drawings and plans shown are preliminary design studies only and are subject to information available at the time.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Rochester Airport Masterplan
    Rochester Airport Masterplan January 2014 ❚ Contents 1 Introduction 3 The Vision 2 The future of the airport 4 Rochester Airport and adjoining land Introduction 4 will be developed as a strategic gateway The proposals for the airport 5 and economic hub. The existing general Consultation 5 aviation airport will be retained and improved and high value economic Key airport questions answered 7 activities provided on surplus land to 3 The masterplan area 10 create skilled employment opportunities. Introduction 10 This will capitalise on the presence of the existing BAE facility. An opportunity to Land ownership 10 enhance working aviation heritage facilities Urban design 12 as a public visitor attraction will also be Engineering and environmental issues 16 achieved. The open outlook provided by Safeguarding 18 the airport will be retained and improved. Over the longer term reinvestment will be 4 Policy context 20 encouraged on the Laker Road and Airport Introduction 20 industrial estates and other adjoining sites. Economic development 20 This will establish Rochester Airport as an Transport and movement 21 economic location of real signifi cance and Summary 21 a model for the area. 5 Design framework and guidance 22 Introduction 22 Land use 22 Access 24 Building heights 26 Urban design 28 Design guidance 30 6 Illustrative masterplan 35 Rochester Airport Masterplan ©TIBBALDS JANUARY 2014 2 ❚ 1 Introduction 1.1 Rochester Airport is owned by Medway Council and A2 is a vital part of Medway’s future economic prosperity. The To Ebbsfl eet Council wants the airport and adjoining land to provide a International and St Pancras strategic gateway to Medway and an economic hub.
    [Show full text]
  • Staplehurst Neighbourhood Plan
    STAPLEHURST NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN SUBMISSION PLAN 2015 — 2031 JULY 2015 Staplehurst Parish Council STAPLEHURST NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN REGULATION 16 (SUBMISSION PLAN) July 2015 This plan has been prepared by: Staplehurst Parish Council, The Parish Office, Village Centre, High Street, Staplehurst, Kent, TN12 0BJ. Digital copies of this document can be downloaded from: www.staplehurstvillage.org.uk www.maidstone.gov.uk / 2 Please send all comments and responses to: Maidstone Borough Council, Maidstone House, King Street, Maidstone, ME15 6JQ. Staplehurst Parish Council / July 2015 / Submission Plan / 3 BUILDING A STAPLEHURST FIT FOR THE FUTURE PLAN PERIOD 2015 — 2031 / Staplehurst Parish Council / Neighbourhood Plan / 4 doc. ref: 099_Q_150908_Submission-Plan_FINAL Feria Urbanism is a planning and design studio that specialises in neighbourhood strategies, public participation and community engagement. Established in 2007, we have been involved in a diverse range of projects across the UK and have developed key skills in organising community engagement events to inform excellent planning and design. Contact for further information Richard Eastham | Feria Urbanism | www.feria-urbanism.eu + 44 (0) 7816 299 909 | + 44 (0) 1202 548 676 All maps within this document are reproduced from the Ordnance Survey mapping with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationary Office. © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution and civil proceedings. The Maidstone Borough Council Licence No. 100019636, 2011. Drawings and plans shown are preliminary design studies only and are subject to information available at the time. They are not subject to measured survey, legal, structural, soil investigation, utilities survey, daylight/sunlight, topographical, mechanical and electrical, highways and access rights surveys, or planning permissions.
    [Show full text]
  • Habitats Regulations Assessment Revision C
    Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council Habitats Regulations Assessment January 2019 Tonbridge & Malling Borough Council Mott MacDonald Mott MacDonald House 8-10 Sydenham Road Croydon CR0 2EE United Kingdom T +44 (0)20 8774 2000 F +44 (0)20 8681 5706 mottmac.com Tonbridge & Malling Borough Council Gibson Drive Tonbridge and Malling Kings Hill 323860 001 C West Malling Borough Council ME19 4LZ Mott MacDonald Habitats Regulations Assessment January 2019 Mott MacDonald Group Limited. Registered in England and Wales no. 1110949. Registered office: Mott MacDonald House, 8-10 Sydenham Road, Tonbridge & Malling Borough Council Croydon CR0 2EE, United Kingdom Mott MacDonald | Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council Habitats Regulations Assessment Issue and Revision Record Revision Date Originator Checker Approver Description Draft 11/01/19 SW KA SM First Issue Second 22/01/19 SW KA CM Second Issue issue Third 29/01/19 SW CM CM Third Issue Issue Document reference: 323860 | 001 | C Information class: Standard This document is issued for the party which commissioned it and for specific purposes connected with the above- captioned project only. It should not be relied upon by any other party or used for any other purpose. We accept no responsibility for the consequences of this document being relied upon by any other party, or being used for any other purpose, or containing any error or omission which is due to an error or omission in data supplied to us by other parties. This document contains confidential information and proprietary intellectual property. It should not be shown to other parties without consent from us and from the party which commissioned it.
    [Show full text]