Government Organization

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Statement of Qualifications

G O VERNMENT O R GANIZATION



Open Space and Agricultural Preservation Programs Intergovernmental Agreements Special District Formation, Consolidation and Dissolution Annexation Studies Municipal Incorporation Municipal Service Reviews

2012

A BOUT E CONOMIC & P LANNING S YSTEMS

  • The Firm
  • Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) is a land

economics consulting firm experienced in the full spectrum of services related to real estate development, the financing of public infrastructure and government services, land use and conservation planning, and government organization.

  • Guiding Principle
  • EPS was founded on the principle that real estate

development and land use-related public policy should be built on realistic assessment of market forces and economic trends, feasible implementation measures, and recognition of public policy objectives, including provisions for required public facilities and services.

Areas of Expertise



Government Organization Open Space and Resource Conservation Land Use Planning and Growth Management Public Finance Real Estate Market and Feasibility Analysis Fiscal and Economic Impact Analysis Reuse, Revitalization, and Redevelopment Real Estate Transactions and Negotiations Regional Economics and Industry Analysis Transportation Planning and Analysis Asset Valuation and Repositioning

  • Clients Served
  • Since 1983 EPS has provided consulting services to

hundreds of public- and private-sector clients in California and throughout the United States. Clients include LAFCo cities, counties, special districts, multijurisdictional authorities, property owners, developers, financial institutions, and land use attorneys.

  • Staff Capabilities
  • The professional staff includes specialists in public

finance, real estate development, land use and transportation planning, government organization, and computer applications. The firm excels in preparing concise analyses that disclose risks and impacts, support decision making, and provide solutions to real estate development and land userelated problems.

EPS Locations

EPS Web Site
Berkeley, Los Angeles, and Sacramento, California Denver, Colorado

www.epsys.com

G OVERNMENT O RGANIZATION

Local governments, including cities, counties, and special districts, provide a range of essential services to their constituent communities. These services, which include public safety, public health and welfare, education services, parks and recreation, land use regulation and environmental protection, underpin the quality of life and the economy of local communities and regions. Because of the dynamic aspects of urban areas—population growth and development, changing service demands and standards, and desire for improved governance—local government agencies regularly make organizational changes. New districts are created, new cities are incorporated, cities annex territory, and local governments form joint exercise of powers agencies. Most of these actions are regulated in California by Local Agency Formation Commissions (LAFCo) operating within each of the State’s 58 counties.

EPS evaluates the costs, benefits, and feasibility of local government reorganization. As a part of this work, detailed pro forma budget forecasts for the new jurisdiction are prepared, alternative organizational options are evaluated, and impacts upon existing entities are estimated. These government organization studies draw upon EPS’s broader expertise in fiscal analysis, public finance, land use planning, and open space and agricultural preservation, as well as our thorough knowledge of local government forms and options and the mission and functions of LAFCo’s.

Services Provided

Open Space and Agricultural Preservation Programs—EPS prepares policies and programs

intended to preserve open space and agriculture as a part of city and county general plan policy development, general plan implementation programs, and CEQA-based mitigation programs. As a central mandate for the State’s LAFCo’s is “…discouraging urban sprawl, preserving open– space and prime agricultural lands…”, EPS also assists LAFCo’s with developing open space and agricultural programs.

Intergovernmental Agreements—EPS assists government agencies, including local, state, and federal agencies, with the formation of intergovernmental agreements. These agreements help to achieve a common interest, including the provision of a regional service such as transit or sewage treatment, the protection of natural resources, or the sharing of public revenues. EPS conducts feasibility analyses, prepares draft agreements, and assists with agreement negotiation.

Special District Formation, Consolidation and Dissolution—EPS prepares financial

feasibility studies for proposed special districts and for consolidation proposals. District formations are often necessary to create a municipal service and governance framework for newly developing communities or to improve services in existing communities. EPS feasibility studies are based on a multiyear, pro forma operating budget for the new district. EPS also specializes in preparation of special studies required before consideration of a district dissolution.

Annexation Studies—EPS prepares financial feasibility studies for annexation of territory to existing cities and districts. These annexations are typically proposed to extend municipal services to peripheral areas designated for development or seeking improvements to municipal services.

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.

2

M:\SOQ\SOQs by PAR\Government Organization\Soq_GovOrg_Nov12.doc

Government Organization
EPS Statement of Qualifications
November 2012

Municipal Incorporation Feasibility—EPS prepares financial feasibility studies for

communities seeking municipal incorporation. These studies include initial feasibility studies completed for community-based organizations and comprehensive fiscal analyses legally required for formation. These feasibility studies are based on a multiyear, pro forma operating budget for the new city.

Municipal Service Reviews—EPS prepares “municipal service reviews,” which are comprehensive assessments of local government agencies within a county. Concerns regarding the proliferation of special districts in California led to legislation requiring the Local Agency Formation Commissions to conduct reviews of existing local government entities. These reviews are intended to identify opportunities to improve municipal services through consolidation and other reorganization efforts. EPS also assists with identification and review of Disadvantaged Unincorporated Communities (DUCs), per recent State legislation.

Representative Projects

Open Space and Agricultural Preservation

Santa Rosa/Rohnert Park Community Separator Area, Preservation Strategies, Sonoma

County, California



South Livermore Valley Area Plan Agricultural Preservation Strategy, Livermore, California Davis Agricultural Buffer and Farmland Mitigation Ordinance, Davis, California Yolo County Habitat Conservation Plan Economic Analysis and Financing Plan, Yolo County,

California



Davis Open Space Implementation Plan, Davis, California Santa Rosa Recreation and Needs Assessment Study, Santa Rosa, California Nicasio Valley Financial Evaluation of Transfer of Development Rights, Nicasio, California Green Valley Area Plan Transfer of Development Program, Solano County, California North Livermore General Plan Amendment, Open Space Strategy, Livermore, California North Natomas Agricultural Land Preservation Strategy, Sacramento, California San Martin/Gilroy Greenbelt Implementation Strategy Report, Gilroy, California

Intergovernmental Agreements



Tiburon/Marin County Cooperative Agreement, Tiburon, California Orange County Fire District Feasibility Study, Orange County, California Regional Transportation Authority Intergovernmental Agreement, Roaring Fork, Colorado

Master Property Tax Sharing Agreement, San Joaquin County, California

Special District Formation and Consolidation



Mount Diablo Health Care District Special Study, Concord, California Morgan Hill Fire District Annexation Feasibility Study, Morgan Hill, California

Mark West CSD Feasibility, Sonoma County, California

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.

3

M:\SOQ\SOQs by PAR\Government Organization\Soq_GovOrg_Nov12.doc

Government Organization
EPS Statement of Qualifications
November 2012



Monterey CSD, Monterey County, California

East Orange Water and Wastewater Utilities Study, Orange County, California Rancho Mission Viejo Public Services, Orange County, California

Victorville Water Consolidation, San Bernardino County, California

Victorville District Consolidation and Dissolution, Victorville, California

Public Service and Facility Database, Santa Cruz County, California

Mountain House Community Services District, San Joaquin County, California Orange County Fire District Feasibility Study, Orange County, California West Marin Septic Management Organizational Options and Feasibility Analysis, Marin County,

California



Southern Marin Fire Consolidation Study, Marin County, California Graton CSD Updated Financial Feasibility Analysis, Graton, California

Annexation Studies



Sunset Beach Governance Options Peer Review, Sunset Beach, California

Martinez Annexation Study, Martinez, California

Great Park Annexation Fiscal/Financial Analysis, Orange County, California Annexation Fiscal Analysis for Goleta Valley, Santa Barbara, California Southeast and Southwest Area Plans Financing Plans, Santa Rosa, California

Danville Annexation Support, Danville, California

North Natomas Neighborhood Landscape Service CFD No. 99-02, Sacramento, CA Sacramento Annexation Economic Analysis, Sacramento, California Murrieta Annexation Fiscal Analysis, Murrieta, California Fiscal Study and Annexation Tax Sharing Agreement, Winters, California City and County Annexation Fiscal Impact Analysis, Hollister, California

Municipal Incorporation Feasibility



East Los Angeles CFA, Los Angeles, California

Laughlin Incorporation Feasibility Analysis, Laughlin, Nevada Pahrump Incorporation Feasibility Analysis, Pahrump, Nevada Initial Fiscal Analysis of the West Ranch/Castaic/Tesoro Areas, Los Angeles County, California

Carmel Valley Incorporation CFA, Monterey County, California Arden Arcade IFA, Sacramento County, California Menifee Valley CFA, Riverside County, California La Jolla IFA, San Diego County, California Rancho Santa Fe IFA, San Diego County, California Malaga CFA, Fresno County, California San Martin IFA and CFA, Santa Clara County, California

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.

4

M:\SOQ\SOQs by PAR\Government Organization\Soq_GovOrg_Nov12.doc

Government Organization
EPS Statement of Qualifications
November 2012



Rancho Cordova IFA/CFA, Sacramento County, California Olivehurst IFA, Yuba County, California Castro Valley CFA, Alameda County, California Los Angeles Reorganization, San Fernando Valley, California Carmel Valley IFA, Monterey County, California Oakhurst IFA, Madera County, California Elk Grove CFA, Sacramento County, California Goleta Incorporation CFA, Santa Barbara, California Oakley CFA Technical Support, Contra Costa County, California Rancho Santa Margarita CFA, Orange County, California Windsor Incorporation CFA, Sonoma County, California El Dorado Hills IFA/CFA, El Dorado County, California

Pleasant Grove Incorporation CFA, Yolo County, California

Alamo IFA, Contra Costa County, California Templeton Incorporation IFA, San Luis Obispo County, California Isla Vista Governance Options, Isla Vista, California Aptos IFA, Santa Cruz County, California

Evaluation of Truckee Incorporation Feasibility Studies, Nevada County, California Shasta County Incorporation CFA Review, Shasta County, California

Lake Tahoe IFA, Douglas County, Nevada

Municipal Service Reviews



Merced County Municipal Service Reviews (MSR), Merced, California Victorville Municipal Service Review, Victorville, California Sonoma County MSRs for Sanitation, Fire, and Cities, Sonoma County, California

Modesto Master Services Element/MSR, Stanislaus County, California

Merced County MSRs for Water, Sanitation, Cities, Resource Conservation, and Other

Districts, Merced County, California



Los Alamitos, Seal Beach MSR, Orange County, California Rancho Mission Viejo MSR, Orange County, California

Project Profiles—Intergovernmental Agreements

Tiburon/Marin County Cooperative Agreement

Tiburon, California

EPS assisted the Town of Tiburon with negotiating a Cooperative Agreement with Marin County for maintenance of Paradise Drive, a major thoroughfare. This agreement would allow annexation of unincorporated territory to the Town, with the Town providing municipal services, while having Marin County continue its obligation to maintain Paradise Drive as a County road.

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.

5

M:\SOQ\SOQs by PAR\Government Organization\Soq_GovOrg_Nov12.doc

Government Organization
EPS Statement of Qualifications
November 2012

In addition to preparing the financial forecasting framework to estimate implications for property tax revenues, fee revenue, and service costs, EPS assisted with the evaluation of options.

Orange County Fire District Feasibility Study

Orange County, California

EPS evaluated the financial feasibility of creating a fire district independent of Orange County. Utilizing population forecasts, EPS estimated station and staffing requirements, as well as cost trends. EPS developed a ten-year cash flow model replicating the proposed District’s revenues and expenditures. Several assumptions were tested, including alternative fee structures and cost-sharing arrangements among the participating cities. The results helped to determine financial feasibility and evaluate the equity of different cost-sharing structures.

San Joaquin County Master Tax Sharing Agreement

San Joaquin County, California

San Joaquin County’s existing property tax sharing agreement with its jurisdictions was subject to scrutiny within the County as a potential barrier to growth and development. Based on discussions with key stakeholders in the County, it was determined that San Joaquin County would enter into negotiations to modify the tax sharing agreement, in conjunction with a series of potential tradeoffs involving the cities’ possible participation in capital funding initiatives.

EPS assisted the County in the evaluation and negotiation of a revised agreement. EPS conducted a comprehensive analysis of County growth prospects and tested various potential amendments using a detailed fiscal model developed by EPS. In addition, EPS worked with representatives of individual cities, the Building Industry Association, and other economic development stakeholders such as the San Joaquin Partnership to provide information and record concerns. Based on these technical and outreach efforts, the County and its seven cities unanimously adopted the revised agreement.

Project Profiles—Special District Formation,
Consolidation, and Dissolution

Mount Diablo Health Care District Special Study

Concord, California

Contra Costa LAFCO initiated a Special Study in response to past and ongoing community concerns about whether the Mount Diablo Health Care District (MDHCD) should continue as a special district, and in response to recommendations of the Healthcare MSR adopted by Contra Costa LAFCO in 2007. The MDHCD was the subject of Grand Jury Reports in 2001, 2003, 2008 and 2011. The Grand Jury was concerned that the District was no longer fulfilling a useful mission and should be dissolved. Other members of the community had called on LAFCO begin the process of dissolving the District.

Under Government Code (GC) §56375(a)(3), a commission may initiate the dissolution or consolidation of a district only if that change of organization or reorganization is consistent with a recommendation or conclusion of a study prepared pursuant to §56378 (special study), §57425, (SOI update), or §56430 (MSR). EPS prepared the Special Study pursuant to Government Code §56378 to assist LAFCO with their decision and required findings.

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.

6

M:\SOQ\SOQs by PAR\Government Organization\Soq_GovOrg_Nov12.doc

Government Organization
EPS Statement of Qualifications
November 2012

Morgan Hill Fire District Annexation Feasibility Study

Morgan Hill, California

The Santa Clara County Central Fire Protection District proposes to improve the delivery of fire protection services in the County by annexing the City of Morgan Hill, which currently contracts with the District for service. In addition to efficiencies gained by creation of a larger regional fire protection entity, the dedication of property tax revenues to fire protection can help to achieve service improvements.

EPS assisted the City and County in analyzing the proposed annexation. The EPS analysis included a Plan for Services. The Plan describes how services would be provided and who would provide the services, what infrastructure and capital improvements would be required, and how the services would be financed. In addition, the Plan demonstrates the District’s capability to provide necessary services without lowering the level of service provided to areas currently served by the District. The report found potential benefits; however, the results are contingent upon State decisions regarding the allocation of property taxes following annexation.

Community Services District for Water Services

Mark West, Sonoma County, California

At the request of the Sonoma County Water Agency, EPS assessed the feasibility of the formation of a Community Services District (CSD) in the Mark West area to acquire, operate, and manage the area’s water system. California-American Water Company, a privately held company whose operations are regulated by the California Public Utilities Commission, owns and operates the system serving approximately 2,050 residential connections and 280 commercial connections.

EPS’s report provided an initial review of feasibility, describing advantages and drawbacks of public operation of the currently private system, as well as the potential impacts on rates and other costs to residents and property owners related to acquisition and operation. The analysis also discussed options related to the phasing of the CSD formation, bond issuance, and acquisition of the system.

Mark West Community Services District Feasibility

Sonoma County, California

The Sonoma County Water Agency retained EPS to assess the feasibility of forming a CSD in the Mark West area to provide a range of services, including lighting maintenance, road maintenance, enhanced levels of sheriff protection, solid waste management, parks and recreation, and water service. These services, with the exception of water service, were provided by the County.

The formation of a CSD offered the community an opportunity to address community concerns and desires for enhanced levels of service, while also providing a forum for local management and direction. CSD formation would establish an entity that could manage the acquisition and operation of the local water system, if the community decided to pursue the cost and effort that would be required. The cost of acquiring the water system was evaluated in a prior EPS analysis.

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.

7

M:\SOQ\SOQs by PAR\Government Organization\Soq_GovOrg_Nov12.doc

Government Organization
EPS Statement of Qualifications
November 2012

East Orange Water and Wastewater Utilities Study

Orange County, California

A large property owner/developer in Orange County owned a large area of property located partially within the City of Orange and partially within its sphere of influence. This property had been divided into several planning areas. EPS conducted financial analysis as part of a report to LAFCo evaluating options for the provision of domestic water and wastewater service to the proposed development areas. Two water districts and the City of Orange had all expressed a willingness and desire to provide municipal water and wastewater services to at least portions of the same development areas. To assist the Orange County LAFCo in determining the most appropriate provider, EPS reviewed the financial implications of each prospective service provider, including rate implications.

Victorville District Consolidation and Dissolution

Victorville, California

EPS analyzed options for consolidating water services in the Victorville area, including a budget analysis of the new entity. EPS also assisted the City in its application to LAFCo to consolidate several subsidiary special districts that served the area but were already functionally consolidated into the City organization. The districts included fire, recreation and parks, and sanitation.

Recommended publications
  • Bylaws, Policies and Procedures 2018

    Bylaws, Policies and Procedures 2018

    Bylaws, Policies and Procedures 2018 Page| 1 INTRODUCTION This Handbook contains the bylaws, accounting, personnel and general policies and procedures of the Orange County Local Agency Formation Commission. LAFCO’s governing statute, the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Government Reorganization Act of 2000 (Government Code Section 56000 et seq.) requires that each LAFCO adopt written policies and procedures. Since its formation in 1963, Orange LAFCO has adopted individual policies and procedures over the years as necessary and required by State Law and at the request of the Commission. In 2005, the Commission adopted its first “Orange County LAFCO Handbook” which consolidated and updated all of the written policies and procedures previously adopted by Orange LAFCO along with recommended changes and revisions. The LAFCO Handbook is revisited and updated regularly to incorporate any changes in State law or in policies adopted by the Commission in the preceding year. The intent of the LAFCO Handbook is to provide one unified, current and comprehensive resource document to better inform LAFCO, its staff, public agencies and citizens of Orange County about the operations, responsibilities and functions of Orange LAFCO. The LAFCO policies and procedures contained herein generally do not reiterate or interpret State law. They are intended to supplement State law and reflect the unique circumstances and conditions in Orange County. For ease of reference, the Handbook is divided into five major Sections: (1) LAFCO Bylaws; (2) Accounting and Financial Policies
  • Legislative Action Guide

    Legislative Action Guide

    ORANGE COUNTY business council LEGISLATIVE ACTION GUIDE 2011 ~ 2012 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS CORPORATE SUPPORT SUSTAINING PARTNERS OCBC MEMBERS AND INVESTORS 24/7 Yellow Cab CMTC Mesa Consolidated Water District Rancho Mission Viejo LLC Abbott Medical Optics Coast Community College District Metropolitan Water Dist SoCal Rancho Santiago CCD Abode Communities Cordoba Corporation Michael Brandman Associates RBF Consulting ACEC County of Orange Mission Center for Longevity Reed and Davidson LLP AECOM Cox Business Services, OC Monaco Group Related Companies of Calif. Aera Energy LLC CresaPartners of OC Municipal Water District OC Ricoh Electronics Inc Aitken Aitken Cohn Curt Pringle & Associates Neighborhood Housing Services OC Robert Mayer Corporation Alacer Corporation Discovery Science Center Newmeyer & Dillion LLP RSI Development LLC Allergan, Incorporated Dorsey & Whitney, LLP Newport Banning Ranch LLC Rutan & Tucker LLP Alta Med Health Services Corp. Dot Printer, Inc. Northwestern Mutual Financial Saddleback Memorial Foundation Alzheimer’s Association OC Edwards Lifesciences Nossaman Guthner Knox & Elliot Santa Ana Chamber of Commerce A-Med Health Care Experian Nutrilite Santa Margarita Water District Ames & Associates First American Title Company Oakley SchoolsFirst Fed Credit Union Anaheim Marriott Hotel Five Points Community OC Automobile Dealers Association Schubert Flint Public Affairs Apartment Association of OC Flatiron Construction Corporation OC Boy Scouts of America Scott Baugh & Associates Aspen Media Fluor Corporation OC Children and Families SDG&E and The Gas Company AT&T California Four Corners Transportation Coalition OC Department of Education Second Harvest Food Bank OC Automobile Club of Southern CA Fullerton Community Bank OC Fair and Events Center Segerstrom Center for the Arts Bank of America Califiornia Gallagher Benefit Services OC Prof Firefighters Assoc Sensys Networks, Inc.
  • Local Agency Formation Commission of Napa County Phone: (707) 259-8645 Subdivision of the State of California Fax: (707) 251-1053

    Local Agency Formation Commission of Napa County Phone: (707) 259-8645 Subdivision of the State of California Fax: (707) 251-1053

    1030 Seminary Street, Suite B Napa, California 94559 Local Agency Formation Commission of Napa County Phone: (707) 259-8645 Subdivision of the State of California Fax: (707) 251-1053 www.napa.lafco.ca.gov We Manage Local Government Boundaries, Evaluate Municipal Services, and Protect Agriculture Agenda Item 8a TO: Local Agency Formation Commission PREPARED BY: Brendon Freeman, Interim Executive Officer MEETING DATE: June 29, 2015 SUBJECT: Study Schedule Alternatives RECOMMENDATION The Commission is invited to discuss the staff report and direct staff with respect to possible amendments to the policy on municipal service reviews and/or study schedule. BACKGROUND In February 2008, the Commission adopted an ambitious study schedule for fiscal year 2008-09 through 2012-13 outlining the specific timeline for completion of the agency’s second round of municipal service reviews (MSRs) and sphere of influence (SOI) updates pursuant to California Government Code (G.C.) Sections 56430 and 56425, respectively. The Commission amended the study schedule in November 2008, June 2010, and December 2011 primarily in response to (1) unanticipated increases in proposal activity and (2) reduction in available staff resources associated with the Commission hosting the 2011 CALAFCO Annual Conference at Silverado Resort. Additionally, two separate vacancies in the agency’s Executive Officer position further reduced the Commission’s ability to meet the adopted study schedule timeline. DISCUSSION The Commission’s existing MSR policy states, “The Commission may also amend the study schedule to add, modify, or eliminate calendared municipal service reviews to address changes in circumstances, priorities, and available resources.” It is therefore within the Commission’s authority to direct staff to amend the policy in recognition of recent changes in available resources associated with the departure of the agency’s Executive Officer in December 2014.
  • LAFCO – Is It Working?

    LAFCO – Is It Working?

    Orange County Grand Jury 2004-2005 LAFCO – Is It Working? 1. Summary The Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) was originally formed to: Some Acronyms and encourage the orderly formation of local Abbreviations in this governmental agencies Report preserve agricultural land resources CKH Act Cortese-Knox- discourage urban sprawl Hertzberg Local It performed this job effectively, leaving few Government Act remaining areas likely to incorporate into new “Unincorporated Island” cities. Therefore, LAFCO’s focus has recently County-run area evolved to: surrounded by cities facilitating the incorporation of unincorporated LAFCO Local Agency islands Formation conducting Municipal Service Reviews (MSRs) Commission to plan for future delivery and funding of MSRs Municipal Service municipal services Reviews updating Sphere of Influence (SOI) OC Orange County determinations SOI Sphere of Influence Obstacles to these processes include: VLF Vehicle License Fee island residents who do not want a new address legislation mandated by the State of California sewer vs. septic systems outside influence, city vs. county code enforcement increase of government fees LAFCO is working to overcome these obstacles with the support of the Orange County Board of Supervisors, stakeholder involvement, and innovative use of the MSR process. The education of island residents about improved delivery of local services, improved public safety provisions, and improved representation through city councils will increase the opportunity for a favorable annexation. When LAFCO is successful, the county can focus on regional, not local, services to county residents. Page 1 of 13 Orange County Grand Jury 2004-2005 2. Introduction and Purpose The grand jury chose to study LAFCO to determine if the stakeholders (county, cities, LAFCO, special districts) are effectively working toward the annexation of the unincorporated islands and the development of MSRs and SOIs, as set forth by the legislature and commission.
  • Orange County Local Agency Formation Commission (Lafco): It’S Time to Redraw the Lines

    Orange County Local Agency Formation Commission (Lafco): It’S Time to Redraw the Lines

    ORANGE COUNTY LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION (LAFCO): IT’S TIME TO REDRAW THE LINES GRAND JURY 2014-2015 Orange County Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO): It’s Time to Redraw the Line TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................ 3 BACKGROUND .............................................................................................................. 3 What a LAFCO Is ........................................................................................................ 3 How LAFCOs Were Created ................................................................................... 4 The Purpose of LAFCO .......................................................................................... 4 What LAFCOs Do .................................................................................................... 4 Special Districts ......................................................................................................... 6 Annexations ............................................................................................................... 8 REASON FOR THE STUDY ......................................................................................... 12 METHODOLOGY .......................................................................................................... 13 INVESTIGATION AND ANALYSIS ............................................................................... 13 Consolidations of Special Districts .......................................................................