KAA County Record Claim

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

KENT ARCHERY ASSOCIATION www.archerykent.org.uk County Record Claim About You: Other Title: Mrs. Miss Mr. Mstr. …………………………… Surname: Forename(s): Address: Telephone no: E-mail Address: Date of Birth: ArcheryGB member no: Club Name: Your Record Claim: Date Shot: Venue: “Club Day” or Event: Gender: Lady Gentleman Age Group: Senior Under 18 Under 16 Under 14 Under 12 Discipline: Outdoor Target Indoor Target Field Clout Bow Type: Compound Unlimited Compound Unlimited Compound Unlimited Compound Unlimited (circle one only in the same Recurve Freestyle Recurve Freestyle Compound Limited Recurve Freestyle column as the selected Discipline.) Recurve Barebow Recurve Barebow Compound Barebow Recurve Barebow Longbow Longbow Recurve Freestyle Longbow Recurve Barebow Recurve Traditional American Flatbow Longbow Disability Category: None ARST ARW1 ARW2 ARVI (blindfold) Round Shot: Score: Supporting Document: You must enclose one If your claim relates to a round shot at a If your claim relates to a round shot at a club of the following: tournament or competition, then please enclose a target day, then please enclose your original score copy of the complete results list. sheet, signed by you and the target captain and (Please highlight your result.). certified by a club official that the round was shot (please tick one only) and scored in compliance with ArcheryGB rules. Tick if applicable Tick if applicable Signature of Archer: Date: I accept the Terms and Conditions included in the current KAA Policy – County Records and confirm that the above information is accurate. I confirm that this score was shot & scored according to ArcheryGB rules and complies with the eligibility conditions for county records. I enclose a copy of the tournament results or a completed score-sheet to support my claim. Please ensure that you have completed all sections of this form. The Kent Archery Association is affiliated to: The Southern Counties Archery Society ArcheryGB, Lilleshall National Sports Centre, nr Newport, Shropshire TF10 9AT World Archery, Maison du Sport International, Avenue de Rhodanie 54, CH-1007 Lausanne, Switzerland .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

A Feasibility Study of Kinematic Characteristics on the Upper Body According to the Shooting of Elite Disabled Archery Athletes
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Article A Feasibility Study of Kinematic Characteristics on the Upper Body According to the Shooting of Elite Disabled Archery Athletes Tae-Whan Kim 1 , Jae-Won Lee 2, Seoung-Ki Kang 3, Kyu-Yeon Chae 4, Sang-Hyup Choi 5,* and Yong-Gwan Song 6,7,* 1 Korea Institute of Sport Science, Seoul 01794, Korea; [email protected] 2 Department of Special Physical Education, YongIn University, Yongin-si 17092, Korea; [email protected] 3 Graduate School of Education, YongIn University, Yongin-si 17092, Korea; [email protected] 4 Department of Physical Education and Training, Shanghai University of Sports, Shanghai 200438, China; [email protected] 5 Center for Sport Science in Jeju, Jeju 63819, Korea 6 Department of Marine Sports, Pukyong National University, Busan 48513, Korea 7 Department of Marine Design Convergence Engineering, Pukyong National University, Busan 48513, Korea * Correspondence: [email protected] (S.-H.C.); [email protected] (Y.-G.S.) Abstract: The purpose of this study is to compare and analyze the kinematic characteristics of the upper limb segments during the archery shooting of Paralympic Wheelchair Class archers (ARW2—second wheelchair class—paraplegia or comparable disability) and Paralympic Standing Class archers (ARST—standing archery class—loss of 25 points in the upper limbs or lower limbs), where archers are classiﬁed according to their disability grade among elite disabled archers. The participants of this study were selected as seven elite athletes with disabilities by the ARW2 (n = 4) Citation: Kim, T.-W.; Lee, J.-W.; and ARST (n = 3). The analysis variables were (1) the time required for each phase, (2) the angle of Kang, S.-K.; Chae, K.-Y.; Choi, S.-H.; inclination of the body center, (3) the change of trajectory of body center, and (4) the change of the Song, Y.-G.
[Show full text]
Women in the Olympic and Paralympic Games
WOMEN IN THE OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC GAMES An Analysis of Participation and Leadership Opportunities April 2013 RESEARCH REPORT SHARP Center for Women & Girls Sport | Health | Activity | Research | Policy Foreword and Acknowledgments This study is the fourth report in the series that follows the progress of women in the Olympic and Paralympic movement. The first three reports were published by the Women’s Sports Foundation. This report is published by SHARP, the Sport, Health and Activity Research and Policy Center for Women and Girls. The report provides the most accurate, comprehensive and up-to-date examination of the participation trends among female Olympic and Paralympic athletes and the hiring and governance trends of Olympic and Paralympic governing bodies with respect to the number of women who hold leadership positions in these organizations. It is intended to provide governing bodies, athletes and policymakers at the national and international level with new and accurate information with an eye toward making the Olympic and Paralympic movement equitable for all. SHARP, the Sport, Health and Activity Research and Policy Center for Women and Girls, was established in 2010 as a new partnership between the Women’s Sports Foundation and University of Michigan’s School of Kinesiology and Institute for Research on Women & Gender. SHARP’s mission is to lead evidence-based research that enhances the scope, experience and sustainability of participation in sport, play and movement for women and girls. Leveraging the research leadership of the University of Michigan with the policy and programming expertise of the Women’s Sports Foundation, findings from SHARP research will better inform public engagement, advocacy and implementation to enable more women and girls to be active, healthy and successful.
[Show full text]
Shoot for Fun Shoot to Excel Shoot for Life 2 FCA - Long-Term Archer Development Model
FCA - Long-Term Archer Development Model 1 Federation of Canadian Archers Long-Term Archer Development Model Shoot for Fun Shoot to Excel Shoot for Life 2 FCA - Long-Term Archer Development Model Acknowledgements The FCA gratefully acknowledges the work of the following who contributed to this document: Gaston Bibeau, Rick Comeau, Diane Culver (Coaching Association of Canada), Marthe Cusson, Alec Denys, Greg Durward, Jordan Eastman, Alain Gravel, Chloe Greenhalgh, Allen Jenskey, Paul Jurbala (consultant), Maciej Karlowski, Robert Lakeman, Susan Lemke, Hugh MacDonald, Joan McDonald, Bob McIntyre, Kathleen Millar, Don Munroe, Roger Murray, Arthur Nault, Tom Paukovic, Shawn Riggs, Bruce Savage, Bryan Stafford, Richard Way (consultant), Allan R. Wills. This document prepared by Paul Jurbala communityactive Designed by: McAllister Medua We acknowledge the financial support of the Government of Canada through Sport Canada, a branch of the Department of Canadian Heritage. Copyright Federation of Canadian Archers, 2008 All rights reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form for commercial purposes, or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and recording or from any information stored in a retrieval system, without permission from the authors or the Federation of Canadian Archers. ISBN 978-0-920218-21-1 FCA - Long-Term Archer Development Model 1 Table of Contents 2 Foreword: Federation of Canadian Archers 3 What is Long-Term Athlete Development? 13 Shoot for Fun, Shoot to Excel, Shoot for
[Show full text]
Books 1-5 Fita Constitution and Rules
BOOKS 1-5 FITA CONSTITUTION AND RULES BYLAW Approved by FITA Council on 8 November 2009 Effective as of 1 April 2010 Book 1, Appendix 8 - New Implementation of Para-Archery rules PARA-ARCHERY RULES 1 This section explains the additional rules which apply to classified para- athletes at all FITA events. 2 Physically disabled para-athletes are assessed by a panel of three international classifiers. The classifiers will allocate a class to each athlete and issue a classification card showing the class and the assistive devices the athlete is allowed to use. 3. Visually impaired athletes must have an international sight classification card. This is produced by an international sight classifier. 4. FITA recognises the following classes for para-athletes in the bow divisions: 4.1. For Recurve division Women: • ARW1 (with sub-class ARW1-C); • ARW2; • ARST (with sub-class ARST-C); Men: • ARW1 (with sub-class ARW1-C); • ARW2; • ARST (with sub-class ARST-C). Sub-classes are used only for national tournaments not international tournaments . Equipment rules are the same as FITA rules except for the possible use of a release aid as set out in 6.8 below. 26 November 2009 BYLAW BOOKS 1-5 FITA CONSTITUTION AND RULES 4.2 For Compound division • Women OPEN • Women ARW1 • Men OPEN • Men ARW1 Equipment rules are the same as FITA rules, with the following exceptions: • W1 Compound class, the peak weight of the bow is 45 lbs for men and 35 lbs for women; and • no peep sights or scope sights are allowed in this class.
[Show full text]
AF Mar / Apr 01
ArcheryFocusArcheryFocusmagazine Volume 5, Number 2, 2001 $5.00 YouYou askedasked ASTE PM R forfor O it!it! The LoopMaster * O Made for loops, its L cocking mechanism doubles as a safety. It swivels 360˚ Full ReleaseView and rotates out of your way when not in use. What more ! S can you ask for? P O O *Patent Pending L 3 R 6 O ZLY L 0˚ F Z O S E I O WI AD R P VEL - M G The Grizzly Loop* Our E glove completely folds out of your H way! Squeeze into the rubber grip, T while pulling with a comfortable Front Foldaway strap. Also available in our stan- View dard caliper, single ball, or double *Patent Pending ball jaws, the Grizzly is the better glove that you’ve been asking for! ! e Back Foldaway Pro Jackie Caudle e View r *2000 Buckmasters Champion F *2000 ESPN® Outdoor s Games Winner nd w XT Ha Ne rem he e T Pro Shannon The New XTreme * Caudle This year we’ve added fin- *2000 IBO ger grooves and a knurled World *Patents Champion #5,937,842; trigger with a shorter exten- *2000 Cabela’‘ss #5,685,286; Shooter of #5,715,805; sion to the XTreme Series! #5,803,068. the Year Not only is it shorter than Pro George C the competition, it’s also ! Dixon o u made the way you want it! “Since using T.R.U. n o Ball, I have won to y $325,000 in cash and u it prizes, as well as four World, re f We two National, four Team d to make National, eight Shooter of the archery Year, and the 2000 Cabela’s WWW.TRUBALL.COM World Championships! PO Box 1180 Madison Heights, VA 24572 better!better! (804)929-2800 Jesus Christ is our Unlimited Resource! Contents Departments 10 ArcheryFitness Annette M.
[Show full text]
Bowhunɵng Whitetails, Hogs, and Dragons Archery Stories and More…
7+(2)),&,$/38%/,&$7,21 2)7+( 0,&+,*$1/21*%2:$662&,$7,21 ŽǁŚƵŶƟŶŐtŚŝƚĞƚĂŝůƐ͕ ,ŽŐƐ͕ĂŶĚƌĂŐŽŶƐ ƌĐŚĞƌǇ^ƚŽƌŝĞƐ ĂŶĚŵŽƌĞ͙͘ 9ROXPH 1XPEHU 6SULQJ ZZZPLFKLJDQORQJERZRUJ STICKTALK Michigan Longbow Association Council 2014-2015 Publisher: Michigan Longbow AssociaƟon President Nick Viau O Vice President Published InformaƟon: The informaon contained in the 6124 Bittersweet Dr. NE Todd Greenwald E publicaon is presented in good faith; however, since it is Belmont, MI 49306 126 Keathly Dr. obtained from STICKTALK readers, the publisher disclaims 616-635-7194 Battle Creek, MI 49014 viaunick@hotmailcom 269-274-5937 any liability for infringements of patents, copyrights, or [email protected] trademarks. ContribuƟons: STICKTALK is your magazine. We are Recording Secretary always looking for a good hunng story, technical ps, Floyd Wells E Webmaster 9687 W. Beecher Rd Chris Gault E out-door ps, or photographs of longbow hunng. We Clayton, MI 49235 25050 SR 213 request all materials submied for publicaon be original (H) 517-445-2710 Cicero, IN 46034 and exclusive, having not appeared in print in any media (C) 517-605-7513 [email protected] form one full year prior to submission to STICKTALK. [email protected] Submit to: Ken Scollick E STICKTALK Treasurer 3431 Old Creek Dr Caroline Wells Membership Secretary Holly, MI 48442 9687 W. Beecher Interim (H) 248-245-1104 Clayton, MI 49235 Peter Collins E [email protected] [email protected] 1939 Encore Ln. Ann Arbor, MI 48103 810-599-5471 If you wish to have your material returned, it [email protected] Editor must be submied with a stamped, self-addressed Caroline Wells E envelope.
[Show full text]
FITA Para-Archery a Handbook for Classifiers
FITA Para-Archery A Handbook for Classifiers Amended 2010 Classification Rules 1. Archery Sport Classes Archery will be comprised of the following classes: ARW1 (with sport sub-class ARW1-C) ARW2 ARST (with sport sub-class ARST-C) Note: The sport sub-classes are only in place to allow development of archers at a national level and will not be used in international events VI 2. Functional Classification System This classification system uses disability profiles and a numerical calculation of locomotor ability as guidelines. 3. Locomotor Disabilities 3.1. All locomotor abilities are tested by the Assessment of points for muscle strength testing, and/or Assessment of points for dysfunction (co-ordination) testing, and/or Assessment of points for joint mobility 3.2. 340 points have been allocated to an able-bodied archer. This total is used to calculate the relevant classification. Body Segment Arms 180 Trunk 60 Legs 100 Total 340 3.3. The minimal handicap to be eligible to compete is either A loss of 25 points in the arms, or A loss of 20 points in the trunk, or A loss of 15 points in the lower limbs, or A loss of 25 points in total 3.4. Observation of the archer shooting follows and updates the points calculation assessments. This will demonstrate the functional abilities applied in the shooting. 2 4. Classification Procedure 4.1. Each international classification team shall consist of at least three authorised classifiers, at least one of them having a medical background (e.g. physiotherapist or doctor). 4.2. A national classification may be completed by one person.
[Show full text]
Women in the 2000, 2004 and 2008 Olympic and Paralympic Games an Analysis of Participation, Leadership and Media Opportunities
September 2009 Women in the 2000, 2004 and 2008 Olympic and Paralympic Games An Analysis of Participation, Leadership and Media Opportunities A Women’s Sports Foundation Research Report Authorship and Acknowledgments TThis report was authored by Maureen Smith, Ph.D., California State University, Sacramento, and Alison M. Wrynn, Ph.D., California State University, Long Beach. The report was reviewed by Donna A. Lopiano, Ph.D.; Don Sabo, Ph.D.; Marjorie A. Snyder, Ph.D.; Linda Mastandrea; Terri Lakowski; Carly Adams, Ph.D., University of Lethbridge; Ellen Carlton, Ph.D., Sonoma State University; Kerrie Kauer, Ph.D., California State University, Long Beach; Cheryl Cooky, Ph.D., California State University, Fullerton; Matthew Llewellyn, Pennsylvania State University; and Jennifer Piatt, Ph.D., California State University, Sacramento. The initial data collection was assisted by graduate students at California State University, Sacramento: Brandon Babcock, Kristi Jouett, Fred Kelley, Louis Lopez, Lindsey McEuen, Rusty Price, K.V. Vigil and Kelli White as well as graduate students from California State University, Long Beach. All data that was obtained from the Internet was accurate as of April 2009. Every attempt was made to obtain the most accurate and up-to-date data for this report. Special thanks to Deana Monahan for her editorial and graphic design expertise. Published September 2009, by the Women’s Sports Foundation® Eisenhower Park, 1899 Hempstead Turnpike, Suite 400 East Meadow, NY 11554 [email protected] www.WomensSportsFoundation.org © 2009, Women’s Sports Foundation, All Rights Reserved This report may be downloaded from www.WomensSportsFoundation.org. This report may be reproduced and distributed only in its entirety.
[Show full text]
Judges Athletes Committee Awards January 2012
Judges January 2012 Honorary Judge John KEMBER-SMITH has passed away JUDGES It is with much sadness that World Archery was informed that the John KEMBER-SMITH (GBR) Honorary Judge John KEMBER-SMITH (GBR) passed away on ATHLETES COMMITTEE Saturday night, 21 January 2012. Chairperson AWARDS Athlete of the Year in Chile John KEMBER-SMITH had just settled in Danish Recurve Women Team well into a retirement home with his wife Sports Manager of the Year Joan. His passing has come as something PARA-ARCHERY of a shock to his family and all his friends. Para-Archery Committee Paralympic Test Event 2012 He was one of those who other judges Para WRE Bangkok 2012 learned a great deal from, a mentor to a FUTURE EVENTS number of International Judges from Great World Cup 2012 – Stages 1-2 Britain, and someone whom they all had a University WC 2012 great deal of respect for. Despite being Bids for Indoor WC 2014 The World Games 2017 less active, he continued to follow archery PAST EVENTS news every time he could, and only recently had said how much he CQT in Oceania was looking forward to hopefully seeing the London 2012 coverage European Indoor Tournament on television. DEVELOPEMENT Calendar 2012 In 2010 he was awarded Honorary Life Membership of Archery GB Training Camp in Namibia for his services to sport in Great Britain. MEMBER ASSOCIATIONS Archery New Zealand Board Contact Updates CONSTITUTION & RULES Athletes Committee Interpretations Bylaws Chairperson Victoriya KOVAL (UKR), the World Archery Athletes Committee Chairwoman and candidate Calendar Highlights for IOC Athletes Commission, has given birth to Page 8 a daughter.
[Show full text]
Comparison of Kinematic Characteristics of Upper Body
Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 29 December 2020 doi:10.20944/preprints202012.0729.v1 1 Comparison of Kinematic Characteristics of Upper 2 Body according to the Shooting of Elite Disabled 3 Archery Athletes 4 Taewhan Kim1, JaeWon Lee2, SeoungKi Kang3, KyuYeon Chae4, Sang-hyup Choi5, Yong-Gwan Song6 5 6 7 1 Korea Institute of Sport Science, Seoul, Republic of Korea 8 2 Department of Special Physical Education, YongIn University, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea 9 3 Graduate School of Education, YongIn University, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea 10 4 Shanghai University of Sports, Shanghai, China 11 5 Center for Sport Science in Jeju, Jeju, Shanghai, Republic of Korea 12 6 Department of Marine Sports, Pukyong National University, Busan, Republic of Korea 13 14 15 16 17 18 Address Correspondence to: Yong-Gwan, Song, Ph.D. 19 Department of Marine Sports 20 Pukyong National University 21 45, Yongso-ro, Nam-gu, Busan, 48513, Republic of Korea 22 E-mail: [email protected] 23 24 Sang-hyup, Choi, Ph.D. 25 Center for Sport Science in Jeju 26 20, Seogwan-ro, 2-gil, Jeju-si, Jeju-do, 63819, Republic of Korea 27 E-mail: [email protected] 28 29 © 2020 by the author(s). Distributed under a Creative Commons CC BY license. Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 29 December 2020 doi:10.20944/preprints202012.0729.v1 30 Abstract: The purpose of this study is to compare and analyze the kinematic characteristics of the upper limb 31 segments during the archery shooting of Paralympic Wheelchair Class archers (ARW2 - second wheelchair class 32 – paraplegia or comparable disability) and Paralympic Standing Class archers (ARST - standing archery class – 33 loss of 25 points in the upper limbs or lower limbs), where archers are classified according to their disability 34 grade among elite disabled archers.
[Show full text]
Ipc Archery Rules & Regulations
IPC ARCHERY RULES & REGULATIONS 2007 / 2008 International Paralympic Committee Adenauerallee 212-214 53113 Bonn, Germany Tel. + 49-228-2097-200 Fax. +49-228-2097-209 E-mail: [email protected] www.paralympic.org Chapter 1 - Technical Rules .................................................................... 4 1.1 Introduction.................................................................................................. 4 1.2 Disciplines..................................................................................................... 4 1.3 Divisions......................................................................................................... 4 1.4 Sport Classes ............................................................................................. 5 1.5 Rounds............................................................................................................ 6 1.6 Competitions ............................................................................................... 8 1.7 Events ............................................................................................................. 8 1.8 IPC Competition Format....................................................................... 8 1.9 Competition Types .................................................................................. 8 1.10 World and Regional Records and Awards ............................. 8 1.11 World Ranking List............................................................................... 8 1.12 Venues.......................................................................................................
[Show full text]
B122 London 2012 English Worksheets Paralympic Archery V3.Indd 1 14/02/2012 16:11
ENGLISH FOR THE GAMES Paralympic Archery When athletes come together from around the world to compete in the Olympic and Paralympic Games, they are fulfilling their dreams and competing at the highest level. Billions of people across the globe join in; watching, listening to and reading about the greatest global celebration of sport. To celebrate the London 2012 Games, the British Council is making a wide range of classroom resources available for learners of English worldwide. What do you know about archery? Paralympic Archery was first developed to rehabilitate people with a physical disability. However, it quickly became a Recurve bow competitive sport. Are there any stories in your national history about archery? Do you know any famous archers – ancient or modern? Bow Compound bow Archer shooting an arrow Bowstring Arrow Target 70 m To find out more visit www.britishcouncil.org/learnenglish © British Council 2012 Brand and Design/B122 B122 London 2012 English Worksheets Paralympic Archery_V3.indd 1 14/02/2012 16:11 1. Vocabulary a. Write the correct words in the spaces provided. a. bowstring b. bow c. target d. arrow f. compound g. archer shooting e. recurve bow bow an arrow 5 1 2 3 6 7 4 2. The rules of Archery What is it? Paralympic Archery is basically the same as Olympic Archery, but with rules adapted for athletes with a disability. The aim is to shoot arrows as close to the centre of a target as possible. Who can participate in Archery at the Paralympics? Archery events are open only to athletes with a physical disability.
[Show full text]