Values and Practices in Contemporary Improvised Music Author(S): David Borgo Source: Black Music Research Journal, Vol
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Negotiating Freedom: Values and Practices in Contemporary Improvised Music Author(s): David Borgo Source: Black Music Research Journal, Vol. 22, No. 2, (Autumn, 2002), pp. 165-188 Published by: Center for Black Music Research - Columbia College Chicago and University of Illinois Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1519955 Accessed: 23/07/2008 16:48 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=cbmr. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit organization founded in 1995 to build trusted digital archives for scholarship. We work with the scholarly community to preserve their work and the materials they rely upon, and to build a common research platform that promotes the discovery and use of these resources. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. http://www.jstor.org NEGOTIATINGFREEDOM: VALUES AND PRACTICES IN CONTEMPORARYIMPROVISED MUSIC DAVIDBORGO Freeimprovisation is not an action resultingfrom freedom;it is an action directedtowards freedom. -Davey Williams(1984, 32) A compromise between order and disorder, improvision is a negotiationbetween codes and their pleasurabledismantling. -John Corbett(1995, 237) During the last half century, an eclectic group of artists with diverse backgrounds in avant-garde jazz, avant-garde classical, electronic, popu- lar, and world music traditions have pioneered an approach to improvi- sation that borrows freely from a panoply of musical styles and traditions and at times seems unencumbered by any overt idiomatic constraints. Although a definitive history of this often irreverent and iconoclastic group would be impossible-or at least potentially misleading-to com- pile, this article highlights several values and practices that have been, and continue to be, negotiated within the contemporary improvising community. Freedom, in the sense of transcending previous social and structural constraints, has been an important part of jazz music since its inception. The syncopated rhythms and exploratory improvisations and composi- tions of jazz have consistently stretched the structures and forms of American music. The music has also provided a symbol and a culture of DAVIDBORGO recently joined the faculty of the University of California,San Diego, as an assistantprofessor in the CriticalStudies and ExperimentalPractices Program. He received a Ph.D. in ethnomusicologyfrom the Universityof California,Los Angeles, in 1999and pre- viously taught at JamesMadison University in Virginia.Borgo has been a professionalsax- ophonist for more than fifteen years and is currentlyat work on a book exploringthe rela- tionship between the emerging sciences of complexity and contemporaryimprovised music. 165 166 BMR Journal liberation to several generations of musicians and listeners, both at home and abroad. But when Ornette Coleman offered the jazz community Something Else in 1958, he galvanized an approach to freedom that has continued to inspire and inflame many in the jazz community.1 At that time, Coleman and other like-minded musicians began to explore performance practices that relied less on preconceived musical models and explicitly defined ensemble roles. For sympathetic musi- cians, critics, and audiences, the "freedom" implied by these new musi- cal approaches allowed for creativity unencumbered by the constricting harmonies, forms, and rigid meters of bebop and swing styles. It evoked a return to the collective practices and ideals evident in the earliest forms of jazz and pointed the way toward a more inclusive musical approach that could draw on insight and inspiration from the world over. To unsympathetic listeners, "freedom" resulted only in musical mayhem devoid of the swing, melody, and harmony that made traditional jazz music so vital and technically demanding. At approximately the same time that "freedom" was becoming a rally- ing point and a musical goal for many modern jazz musicians, improvi- sation resurfaced in the Euro-American "classical" tradition-after a cen- tury and a half of neglect-in the form of indeterminate, intuitive, and graphically designed pieces.2 Composers not only expanded the amount of real-time creative input demanded of performers, but they explored, in substantial numbers, the potential of improvisation on their own, in a sense conflating the act of creation and performance by removing the interpretive step from the accepted musical equation.3 Since these pioneering early years in both North America and Europe, an approach to improvisation drawing on these and other traditions has 1. The arrival of Ornette Coleman's quartet at the Five Spot in New York City in 1959 and his subsequent albums for Atlantic Records (The Shape of Jazz to Come and FreeJazz) further polarized early support and criticism for the music. See David Ake (2002) for a discussion of the many issues surrounding Coleman's New York arrival. 2. George Lewis (2003) focused on ways in which terms such as interactivity, indetermina- cy, intuition, and even happening or action have frequently been employed to mask the importance of improvisation in the arts. 3. Composers who have experimented with improvisation include Ugo Amendola, Larry Austin, Klarenz Barlow, Richard Barrett, John Cage, Cornelius Cardew, Alvin Curran, John Eaton, Robert Erickson, Jose Evangelista, Lukas Foss, Sofia Gubaidulina, Barry Guy, Jonathan Harvey, Charles Ives, Luigi Nono, Per Norgard, Pauline Oliveros, Harry Partch, Terry Riley, Frederic Rzewski, Giacinto Scelsi, Stefano Scodanibbio, Karlheinz Stockhausen, Morton Subotnik, and Frances-Marie Uitti, as well as the groups FLUXUS, II Gruppo di Improvisazione da Nuova Consonanza (GINC), KIVA (at University of California, San Diego), Musica Electronica Viva, New Music Ensemble (at University of California, Davis), and the Scratch Orchestra. Pioneering work by composers in the American "third stream," such as Gunther Schuller, George Russell, Bob Graettinger, John Lewis, and others, could be mentioned as well. Borgo * Negotiating Freedom 167 emerged in the contemporary music community. A variety of names have circulated at various times and in various locales to describe this musical practice, each with its own group of adherents and each with its own sematic shortcomings.4 The preferred terms tend to highlight the creative or progressive stance of the performers and the cutting-edge or inclusive nature of the music itself, for example, free or free-form, avant-garde, out- side, ecstatic, fire or energy, contemporary or new, creative, collective, spontaneous, and so on. Stylistic references (jazz, classical, rock, world, or electronic) are variously included or excluded, as are cultural or national identity markers (Great Black Music or British Free Improvisation). The primary musical bond shared among these diverse performers is a fasci- nation with sonic possibilities and surprising musical occurences and a desire to improvise, to a signficiant degree, both the content and the form of the performance. In other words, free improvisation moves beyond matters of expressive detail to matters of collective structure; it is not formless music making but form-making music. Musician Ann Farber explains: "Our aim is to play together with the greatest possible free- dom-which, far from meaning without constraint, actually means to play together with sufficient skill and communication to be able to select proper constraints in the courseof the piece, rather than being dependent on precisely chosen ones" (quoted in Belgrad 1997, 2). To define free improvisation in strictly musical terms, however, is poten- tially to miss its most remarkable characteristic-the ability to incorporate and negotiate disparate perspectives and worldviews. Jason Stanyek (1999, 47) asserts that free improvisation is above all "a fertile space for the enact- ment and articulation of the divergent narratives of both individuals and cul- tures." Improvisers have frequently joined together to form artist-run collec- tives aimed at exploring these divergent narratives and at establishing creative and financial control over the production and dissemination of their work.5Although the lifetime of these various collectives runs the gamut from 4. One treatment of the problems associated with categorizing such diverse musical approaches under a single, often misleading, heading is found in Such (1993, 15-29). 5. Important artist-run collectives in the United States have included the Association for the Advancement of Creative Musicians (AACM) in Chicago (which has continued to the present date), the Jazz Composer's Guild (organized by Bill Dixon shortly after his famed October Revolution in Jazz in 1964) and Collective Black Artists (CBA) in New York City, the Black Artists' Group (BAG) in St. Louis (the birthplace of the World Saxophone Quartet), and the Underground Musicians' Association (UGMA)