DOCSLIB.ORG

4.Cv.2018.10.12.5.00

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
4.Cv.2018.10.12.5.00 David Allison, FAIA, FACHA 07.23.2018 Page 1 Alumni Distinguished Professor and Director Graduate Studies in Architecture + Health Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634 USA Born: June 10th, 1956 US Citizen Education, Professional Licensure and Board Certifications 1978 Bachelor of Science in Pre-Architecture with Honors, Clemson University, 1978 1982 Master of Architecture: Health Facilities Planning & Design Concentration, Clemson University, 1982 Since 1985 Licensed Architect: California 1985-2018, South Carolina since 1987, North Carolina since 2000 Since 1987 NCARB Certified 1987 Since 2000 Board Certified by the American College of Healthcare Architects, 2000 Academic Appointments: Since 2015 Faculty Scholar. Clemson University School of Health Research Since 2012 Alumni Distinguished Professor of Architecture: Architecture + Health, Clemson University. 2006-2012 Professor of Architecture: Architecture + Health, Clemson University 1990-2006 Associate Professor of Architecture: Architecture + Health, Clemson University. Since 1990 Director, Graduate Studies in Architecture + Health, Clemson University Professional Experience: Since 1987 David Allison Architect, Clemson SC [1987-1991 Charleston SC] 1985-1987 Middleton McMillan Architects/Gale Architectural Associates, Charleston SC 1982-1985 Kaplan McLaughlin Diaz Architects & Planners, San Francisco CA 1978-1982 Neal Prince & Browning Architects, Greenville, SC 1972-1974 Handy & Harmon Tube Company, Engineering Intern, Norristown PA Sponsored Research/Grants: 2015-2019 Co-Investigator: [Anjali Joseph, Principal Investigator] P30: Realizing Improved Patient Care through Human- centered Design in the Operating Room (RIPCHD.OR) Learning Lab; AHRQ, National Institutes of Health/DHHS [$3,975,998] 2017 Grant: To participate in the AIA Academy of Architecture for Health 2017 Student Design Charrette, Healthcare Design CHD-AIA/AAH Conference Orlando, FL. [$7500] 2015 Grant: To participate in the AIA Academy of Architecture for Health 2015 Student Design Charrette, Healthcare Design CHD-AIA/AAH Conference Washington DC. [$7500] 2015 Grant: To participate in the American Society of Healthcare Engineers and AIA Academy of Architecture for Health Planning + Design Student Challenge at the PDC Conference, San Antonio, TX in March 2015. [$7500] 2014 Principal Investigator [with Byron Edwards]: NCARB Award, Defining Best Practices in Ambulatory Care Design for Medically Underserved Populations: an Integrated and Collaborative Knowledge/Research Informed Learning-Practice Model [$30,000] 2014-2015 Co-Investigator [Shima Clark Principal Investigator] A+CA GOALI: An Engagement of Academia, Industry, and Organizations [$20,925] 2013-2014 Grant: Clemson University Curriculum International Seed Funding [$2000] 2013 Grant: AIA Academy of Architecture for Health 2014 Student Design Charrette, Healthcare Design CHD- AIA/AAH Conference Orlando FL. [$7500] 2013 Grant: TRUMPF, Patient Room Prototype Headwall Development Funding [$30,000] 2012 Grant: AIA Academy of Architecture for Health 2012 Student Design Charrette, Healthcare Design CHD- AIA/AAH Conference Phoenix, AZ [$7500] 2011-2012 Robert Mills Endowed Professorship Funded Research: Patient Room Prototype Refinements [$34,000] 2010-2011 Co-Investigator: [Dina Battisto, Principle Investigator] Development of World Class and Evidence-based Design Tools for Achieving and Evaluating Projects, Department of Defense Military Health System. Subcontract through NXT to Noblis [$350,000] 2010 Grant: AIA Academy of Architecture for Health 2010 Student Design Charrette, HC Design 10 CHD-AIA/AAH Conference Las Vegas, NV. [$5000] 2009-2010 Co-Investigator: [Dina Battisto, Principle Investigator] Development of World Class and Evidence-based Design Tools for Achieving and Evaluating Projects, Department of Defense Military Health System. Subcontract through NXT to Noblis [$300,000] 2009-2010 Co-Investigator: [Dina Battisto, Principle Investigator] Patient Room Prototype Design and Research Project - Phase 3 for the Department of Defense and Spartanburg Regional Health System, Spartanburg, SC. [$487,957] 2008 Grant: AIA Academy of Architecture for Health 2008 Student Design Charrette, AIA/AAH National Fall Conference Miami, Fl. [$5000] 2007 - 2009 Co-Investigator: [Dina Battisto, Principle Investigator] Patient Room Prototype Design and Research Project - Phase 2 for the Department of Defense and Spartanburg Regional Health System, Spartanburg, SC. [$363,633] 2007 Principal Investigator: [with Jerry Reves, Gail Stuart, and Tom Jennings] CoEE/HSSC Health Facilities Research and Testing Laboratory and Endowed Chair for CU and MUSC. [$4,000,000] 2006 Grant: AIA Academy of Architecture for Health 2006 Student Design Charrette, AIA/AAH National Fall Conference Miami, Fl. [$5000] David Allison, FAIA, FACHA 07.23.2018 Page 2 2006 Co-investigator: [Uriel Cohen, Principal Investigator] Critical Issues in Health Environments Research National Survey. [$20,000] 2005 - 2009 Principal Investigator: [with Dina Battisto, Thomas Garvey and David Detrich] Patient Room Prototype Design and Research Project for Spartanburg Regional Health System, Spartanburg, SC. [$300,000] 2005 - 2006 Co-Principal investigator: [with Kirk Hamilton & Frank Zilm]. Hospital Department Net/Gross Study. [$14,000] 2006 Grant: AIA Academy of Architecture for Health 2006 Student Design Charrette, AIA/AAH National Fall Conference, Washington DC. [$5000] 2004 Grant: AIA Academy of Architecture for Health 2004 Student Design Charrette, AIA/AAH National Fall Conference Washington, DC. [$5000] 2004 JSPS Fellowship: Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Invitation Fellowship Program for Research in Japan [Long Term]. Awarded for a 3-month research period in Japan between May 2004 and August 2004 to conduct a comparative study of innovative health facilities in Japan with Dr. Nagasawa at the University of Tokyo. [JY 1,247,000] 2003 Co-Investigator [with David Freedman]: Sustainable Universities Initiative Grant to develop a protocol for a LEED–EB Study of Hardin Hall at Clemson University, [$5000] 2003 Principal Investigator [with Thomas Garvey, Yukari Oka, David Detrich, Dina Battisto, and Barbara Logan]: Clemson University Provost’s Innovation Grant - A Collaborative Interdisciplinary Design Based Research Project to develop an acuity adaptable and universal patient room prototype. [$30,000] 2002 - 2003 Principal Investigator [with Barbara Heifferon]: Facilities Guidelines Institute - Research Project: Usability survey and editorial review of the “Guidelines for the Design and Construction of Health Facilities.” [$20,000] 2002 - 2003 Co-Investigator: [with Geoff Zender, Pat Zungoli, Eric Bensen, et al] Integrated pest management grant to develop a residential learning module for primary school children in SC. 2002 Grant: AIA Academy of Architecture for Health 2002 Student Design Charrette, AIA/AAH National Fall Conference Boston, MA. [$5000] 2002 Research Consultant [Dina Battisto Principal Investigator]: Coalition for Health Environments Research project: The Nature and Rate of Change in Hospital Laboratories. [$20,000] 2001 Research Consultant [Windsor Sherrill Principal Investigator]: Wellness Facility Design, Client Satisfaction, and Improved Health Outcomes. 2000 Grant: AIA Academy of Architecture for Health 2000 Student Design Charrette, AIA/AAH International Fall Conference, Vancouver, BC, Canada. [$5000] 1998 Grant: AIA Academy of Architecture for Health 1998 Student Design Charrette, AIA/AAH National Fall Conference, Pittsburg, PA. [$6000] 1996 Grant: AIA Academy of Architecture for Health 1996 Student Design Charrette, AIA/AAH National Fall Conference, Charlotte, NC. [$3000] 1990 Grant: AIA Academy of Architecture for Health 1990 Student Design Charrette, AIA/AAH National Fall Conference Charleston, SC. [$3000] Presentations, Panels and Symposia: 2018 Peer Reviewed Presentation: Allison, D. “Creating Hospitals without Walls: Addressing Health at the Level of Individuals, Communities and Globally.” European Healthcare Design Conference, London UK, June 2018. 2018 Peer Reviewed Presentation: Allison, D. and Edwards, B. “Hospitals without Walls: Hospitals as Models of Healthy Community Planning and Design.” International Union of Architects [UIA] Public Health Group Conference, Paris France, May 2018 2018 Invited Presentation: Allison, D. “RIPCHD.OR: Ambulatory Surgery Operating Room Study – A research Design Initiative at Clemson University.” McCarthy Construction Summit, Orlando FL, April 2018. 2018 Peer Reviewed Presentation: Kreidich, J, Sangolli, A., Allison, D. and Benhart, B. “Lessons Learned from the AIA/AAH PDC Student Design Challenge.“ American Society of Hospital Engineers [ASHE] International Planning and Design Conference, Nashville TN. March 2018. 2017 Peer Reviewed Presentation: Joseph A., Allison, D., Edwards, B., and Ferguson, A. “EBD in Action: Moving from Research to Design Innovation,” International Healthcare Design Conference, Orlando, FL, November 2017. 2017 Peer Reviewed Poster Session: Joseph, A., Allison, D. and Catchpole K. "Using a Systems Approach to Designing a Safer and More Ergonomic Operating Room," European Healthcare Design Conference, London England, June 2017. 2017 Peer Reviewed Poster Session: Heinrich, E., Allison, D. and Schultz, E. “Daylighting in Practice – Within Surgical Environments” at the European Healthcare Design Conference in London England, June 2017 2017 Peer Reviewed Presentation: Allison, D. "Clemson University Architecture + Health
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Industrial Designers Society of America (IDSA) Fact Sheet The
    Industrial Designers Society of America (IDSA) Fact Sheet . The Industrial Designers Society of America began in 1965 out of the merger of several organizations to include American Designers Institute (ADI), Industrial Designers Institute (IDI), Industrial Designers Education Association (IDEA), Society of Industrial Designers (SID) and American Society of Industrial Designers (ASID). IDSA’s core purpose is to advance the profession of industrial design through education, information, community and advocacy. IDSA creates value by . Publishing Innovation, a quarterly professional journal of industrial design practice and education in America . Developing and organizing a joint national conference and education symposium each year, which brings together industrial designers, educators, business executives and students from all over the world . Hosting five district conferences annually where design practitioners, educators and students gather to consider the state of the profession . Creating and conducting the annual International Design Excellence Awards® (IDEA) and distributing information on the winners to the business, general, international and US design media . Hosting a website to communicate with the industrial design community, to keep members informed and to provide a place for unique content and dialogue to share . Distributing designBytes email that highlights the latest news and trends in the design world . Providing statistical research studies on professional practice, and the structure and financing of consulting and corporate design organizations . Advocating for the industrial design community to federal agencies and state governments . Serving as the primary information resource on design for national newspapers, magazines and television networks . Acting as a clearinghouse for design information requested by the general public . To serve the interests and activities of its members, IDSA formed 16 special interest sections .
    [Show full text]
  • Ida Announces Winners of 12Th Annual Design Competition!
    For Immediate Release Press Contact: Hannah Lillethun / [email protected] IDA ANNOUNCES WINNERS OF 12TH ANNUAL DESIGN COMPETITION! (Friday, March 1, 2019) The world-renowned International Design Awards has just announced the final winners in its 12th Annual contest, representing the most revolutionary designs in 5 major categories: Architecture, Interior Design, Graphic Design, Product Design, and Fashion Design. The International Design Awards (IDA) received thousands of outstanding designs submitted by companies and designers from 89 countries, all competing for the top prizes in this prestigious global award, which has been leading the way in discovering and celebrating fresh new designers from around the world for over a decade. With so many incredible entries and so much outstanding talent, the task of selecting the final winners was difficult to say the least, but after careful consideration and much anticipation, the jury’s selection for this year’s prestigious “Design of the Year” awards have been announced in both the professional and student divisions. The Jury’s winner selection showcases a diverse range of designers whose truly outstanding work and visionary designs captured the jury’s votes and garnered the year’s top awards. PROFESSIONAL CATEGORY WINNERS: ARCHITECTURE INTERIOR DESIGN OF THE YEAR: DESIGN OF THE YEAR: Challenge Design / Gensler / Yuanlu Community Center In Chongqing Gusto PRODUCT GRAPHIC DESIGN DESIGN OF THE YEAR: DESIGN OF THE YEAR: https://idesignawards.com/winners/zoom.php?eid=9-21881-18&count=1&mode=Valery
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Biotic Approaches in Performance Based Design Aparna Joijode a Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirem
    Exploring Biotic Approaches in Performance Based Design Aparna Joijode A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of: Master of Architecture University of Washington 2019 Committee: Rob Pena, Chair Chris Meek, Co-Chair Program Authorized to Offer Degree: Architecture © Copyright 2019 Aparna Joijode University of Washington Abstract Exploring Biotic Approaches in Performance Based Design Aparna Joijode Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Robert B. Peña, Associate Professor and Undergraduate Program Coordinator Department of Architecture For any building, its façade provides the first layer of interaction with its environment, an optimum design can harness significant synergies while a linear design could considerably increase the energy consumption. As designers, we are required to make informed decisions and educate stakeholders of all potential criteria in selection of the design and engineering approach. ‘My thesis goal is to develop such a framework for adaptive façade design based on biomimetic logic and value engineering and test it with parametric modelling. The design subject is a proposed low-income housing project enhanced with biophilic application to provide comfort at low cost.’ Page left blank intentionally This thesis is best viewed as a two-page spread with this page on left hand side. 3 Table of Contents Abstract………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………1 Table of contents………………………………………………………………………………………………………..4 Acknowledgement………………………………………………………………………………………………………6 Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….10
    [Show full text]
  • ENTRY and CONSENT FORM Yves Saint Laurent-Inspired Fashion Design Competition
    ENTRY AND CONSENT FORM Yves Saint Laurent-Inspired Fashion Design Competition Fashion students and recent graduates are invited to create an original look inspired by the fashion icon Yves Saint Laurent and Seattle Art Museum’s special exhibition, Yves Saint Laurent: The Perfection of Style on view from October 11, 2016 through January 8, 2017. Take one of three iconic YSL looks described below as inspiration and create a sketch design; finalists will be selected to produce their looks. Finalists will have the opportunity to produce the entire look and the best three will be displayed in the Seattle Art Museum’s Brotman Forum for the duration of the exhibition. The top three winners will also receive an invitation to the Yves Saint Laurent Opening Celebration on October 8 and a SAM membership to inspire their creativity. Note: travel to Seattle to attend the Opening Celebration not included in prize package. The first prize winner will also receive a photo shoot of their winning look with a Seattle fashion photographer (including model and makeup), gift certificates to fabric stores, and consultation with SAM’s marketing team to help launch their career. 1. Mondrian dress, 1965 Possibly YSL’s most famous look ever, bringing fine art into fashion with a playfulness that was perfectly in tune with Pop art and music of the moment. YSL audaciously applied the modernist concept of flatness to the dress—no darts, no zippers. 2. Safari dress, 1968 This iconic look reached back to France’s colonial past and images of big game hunting. But it took hold with a new audience in the late 1960s as Saint Laurent adapted the laced-up tunic for both men and women, a revolutionary idea of androgyny that would help define the decade of the 1970s.
    [Show full text]
  • Executives of Moma and Bloomingdales Explain Purpose of Design Competition and Introduce Mexican Amd South American Winners
    ••§••• YU TNli4MtfcSEUM OF MODERN ART ,, WEST 53RD STREET, NEW YORK gpHONE: CIRCLE 5-8900 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE EXECUTIVES OF MUSEUM OF MODERN ART AND BLOOMINGDALE*S INC. EXPLAIN PURPOSE OF DESIGN COMPETITION AND INTRODUCE MEXICAN AND SOUTH AMERICAN WINNERS A unique industrial design project for the twenty-one American Republics has resulted in a new group of home furnishing to bs known as Organic Design, it was announced by executives of the Museum of Modern Art and Bloomingdale's Inc. at a luncheon-meeting held Monday, June 16, in the penthouse of the Museum, 11 West 53 Street, Wallace K. Harrison, noted architect and Chairman of the Museum's Industrial Design Committee, presided. Speakers were John Hay Whitney, President of the Museum, who introduced the Mexican and South American winners of the Museum1s Industrial Design Competitions for Home Furnishings; Ira A. Hirschmann, Vice-President of Bloomingdale's; and Eliot F. Noyes, Director of the Museum's Depart­ ment of Industrial Design. Also present at the luncheon-meeting were winners of the Design Competition in the United States, and guests. The purpose of the Design Competitions was to select a group of designers capable of creating a useful and beautiful environment for today's living in terms of furniture, fabrics and lighting. The winners of the Competitions were announced February 1. Winners of the Competition in the United States received royalty contracts for the manufacture of their designs. Winners from the other American Republics received a round trip ticket to New York and $1,000 for ex­ penses during a three or four months' stay here to visit stores and manufacturing plants and look into ways of utilizing the products of their countries for North American use.
    [Show full text]
  • Uia Competition Guide
    International Union of Architects International Competitions Commission GUIDELINES UIA COMPETITION GUIDE FOR DESIGN COMPETITIONS IN ARCHITECTURE AND RELATED FIELDS interpreting and implementing the UNESCO “Standard Regulations for International Competitions in Architecture and Town-Planning” Adopted by the 130th Council in Seoul, March 2017 Amendments adopted by the 131st Council in Kuala Lumpur, July 2017 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Task force: Esa Mohamed, Malaysia, UIA President 2014-2017 Thomas Vonier, USA, UIA Secretary General 2014-2017 Regina Gonthier, Switzerland, ICC Co-Director Jerzy Grochulski, Poland, ICC Co-Director ICC Member-Contributors: Roger Schluntz, USA Serban Tiganas, Romania, Council Member Patrick Colombier, France Paula Huotelin, Finland Kyriakos Pipinis, Greece Pierre Sauveur, Belgium, Council Member Tan Pei Ing, Malaysia Secretariat: Emily Bonin PREFACE In 2016, sixty years after the UIA and UNESCO ratified the standard regulations for international competitions, the UIA International Competition Commission (ICC) spent several months reviewing the rules and guide for conducting competitions. This was in response to growing demands for competitions for increasingly complex projects that not only include buildings but also city development, planning and urban regeneration. During the early stages of the ICC activities, the objectives were to emphasize fairness in the evaluation, quality and innovation. Now these objectives are set against the challenges of sustainability and climate change. There is a strong call for more creative solutions that will enhance the quality of life for the communities where the projects are located, as well as for their users. The designs and creations must take into account the impact on the local social framework while serving as an inspiration for future planning and architecture.
    [Show full text]
  • Interactive Experiences
    QUARTERLY OF THE INDUSTRIAL DESIGNERS SOCIETY OF AMERICA SUMMER 2010 Interactive Experiences EDUCATION n PATENTS n CONCEPTS By Rob Tannen, IDSA and Mathieu Turpault, IDSA [email protected] n [email protected] Rob Tannen, PhD, is director of user research and interface design at Bresslergroup. He specializes in integrated user-interface design for consumer, commercial and medical products. Rob created the Designing for Humans (www. designingforhumans.com) blog, focusing on methods and technology related to user research. n Mathieu Turpault joined Bresslergroup in 1996, relocating from Paris, France. He has grown with the firm to become a partner and director of design. He leads the design team and influences the design direction of every project in the office. Integrating Industrial and User-Interface Designers CREATING EFFECTIVE INTERACTIONS hile some received the recent launch of the Apple iPad as the ultimate evidence of effec- tive user-interface/industrial design synthesis, it is more accurately taken as the exception W that proves the rule. In recent years, we have seen the rapid proliferation of products with integrated digital user interfaces. Led by consumer electronics, and quickly cascading to appliances and commercial, medical and industrial applications, a new product without an integrated touchscreen is behind the times. But Apple’s level of hardware/software integration is so noteworthy because it is so rare. Andy Polaine articulates the more common situation in a sive user experience. Most importantly, there is a general recent Core77 article [http://tinyurl.com/ye2az9h]: “Practically lack of central design leadership responsible for the whole every device I own falls into one of two categories: Some product experience.
    [Show full text]
  • Getting Ready Admission to Industrial Design Portfolio Tips for Industrial
    BFA | Industrial Design ADMISSION TO THE PROGRAM PORTFOLIO REQUIREMENTS Getting Ready Get a Sketchbook. Be curious, observe, think objectively, make notes, sketch and draw your ideas. Take things apart and put them together to learn about how they were made and work. Draw everything you can. Sketch design ideas, sketch what you observed, sketch what you like and sketch what you feel can be improved on. Think about all sorts of things and sketch them. Sketch the forms of nature and its creations. Sketch how you see the future. Note everything in your sketchbook and later draw them, developing them into a sophisticated form of medium for presentation. Find portfolios from other students on the Web from around the world. Check out Coroflot.com and read articles on Core77.com Admission to Industrial Design Applicants to the BFA in Industrial Design must first submit an application to the MSU Office of Undergraduate Admissions. After the preliminary application review, students may be contacted with instructions for scheduling a portfolio interview with the Industrial Design faculty. The portfolio interview is an opportunity to present the applicants’ creativity as well as meet the faculty, tour the facilities, and learn more about the Industrial Design program. [Note: Students may also wish to tour the campus while here.] Since admission to the BFA in Industrial Design major is highly competitive, students are strongly urged to complete applications and schedule appointments for the earliest possible dates. [Intended freshman should do so for no later than March, and transfer students by May] Portfolio reviews for the BFA in Industrial Design major are not held during the summer months of July and August, so be sure to have yours completed before then.
    [Show full text]
  • Industrial Design Degree
    Industrial Design, Associate of Applied Science | Degree Map Follow this map to graduate in two years, though other paths are possible. Contact an advisor through My LaGuardia for additional support, and see reverse for more information. Course Category Priority Credits Session IDF090 First Year Seminar for Industrial Design PC x 0 (2hr) I ENG101 English Composition I RC x 3 (4hrs) I MAT107, 115, 120, 123 or Other Mathematics Required Core Course RC 3 (4hrs) I HUA106 Three Dimensional Design PC x 3 I HUA190 Industrial Design Drawing PC x 3 I SEMESTER 1 HUP102 Critical Thinking or Other Flexible Core Course Option FC 3 II Course Category Priority Credits Session HUA129 Computer Aided Industrial Design PC x 3 I BTM101 Introduction to Business PC 3 I HUA111 Industrial Design Studio I PC x 3 I HUA114 Introduction to Workshop PC x 3 I SEMESTER 2 ENG259 Technical Writing or ENG102 English Composition II RC 3 II Course Category Priority Credits Session HUA112 Industrial Design Studio II PC x 3 I HUA109 SolidWorks Essentials (moved from Sem. 2) PC x 3 I HUA118 Manufacturing Processes and Materials PC x 3 I SCP101 Topics in Physics or other Life and Physical Sciences Course Option RC x 3 I SEMESTER 3 HUA212 History of Design PC 3 II Course Category Priority Credits Session HUA209 Digital Prototyping PC x 3 I HUA295 Industrial Design Capstone PC x 3 I BTM251 Launching New Business Ventures PC 3 I HUP112 Logic & Philosophy or other Flexible Core Course Option FC 3 I SSA101 Cultural Anthropology or other Flexible Core Course Option FC 3 II SEMESTER 4 Register for GRDOOO “Intent to Graduate” in CUNYfirst to apply for graduation in your final semester Credits Required to Graduate More information at laguardia.edu/Industrial-Design Pathways Required Core (RC) 12 Effective Fall 2021-Spring 2022 catalog.
    [Show full text]
  • Industrialdesign
    National Endowment for the Arts I N D U S T R I A L D E S I G N A Competitive Edge for U.S. Manufacturing Success in the Global Economy I N D U S T R I A L D E S I G N A Competitive Edge for U.S. Manufacturing Success in the Global Economy April 2017 National Endowment for the Arts 400 7th Street SW Washington, DC 20506 Telephone: 202-682-5400 arts.gov Produced by Office of Programs and Partnerships, Design Program Jason Schupbach, Director of Design Programs, National Endowment for the Arts Content by Heidi Sheppard, Advisor for Technology Collaborations, National Institute for Standards and Technology, Manufacturing Extension Partnership; Courtney Spearman, Design Specialist, Office of Programs and Partnerships, NEA; and Katryna Carter, Design Consultant, Office of Programs and Partnerships, NEA Other Staff Contributors: Don Ball, Assistant Director - Publications, Office of Public Affairs, NEA; Bonnie Nichols, Operations Research Analyst, Office of Research and Analysis, NEA. Designed by Katryna Carter For their valuable assistance with this report, the NEA Design Program would like to thank the following people: Daniel Martinage, Industrial Designers Society of America; Susan Page Estes and Paul Hatch, DesignHouse; all those who were interviewed; and Laska Hurley, Office of Programs and Partnerships. 202-682-5496 Voice/TTY (a device for individuals who are deaf or hearing-impaired) Individuals who do not use conventional print materials may contact the Arts Endowment’s Office for Accessibility at 202-682-5532 to obtain this publication in an alternate format. This publication is available free of charge in PDF format at arts.gov.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Footsteps of Dior
    SCHOOLS FASHION DESIGN COMPETITION 2020 IN THE FOOTSTEPS OF DIOR DOES YOUR SCHOOL OR COLLEGE HAVE ANY BUDDING FASHION DESIGNERS? IS FASHION DESIGN AN AREA THAT YOUR STUDENTS ARE INTERESTED IN? IF SO, THEN YOU WON’T WANT TO MISS OUR LATEST SCHOOLS FASHION DESIGN COMPETITION! The chosen theme for this year’s competition is ‘In the Footsteps of Dior’. Taking inspiration from Christian Dior: Designer of Dreams, the V&A’s most successful exhibition ever, students are asked to research the House of Dior and present their application to take over the helm from Maria Grazi Chiuri as the current Creative Director of Dior! Overall A fabulous sewing machine for their PRIZES Winning School: D&T department. 1st Prize Student: £75.00 worth of design and craft books, threads and a crafting goody bag. 2nd Prize Student: £50.00 worth of design and craft books, threads and a crafting goody bag. 3rd Prize Student: £25.00 worth of design and craft books, threads and a crafting goody bag. Will take place at the Fashion & Embroidery show on JUDGING Friday 20th March 2020, at the NEC Birmingham. PLEASE NOTE The competition is open to students aged between 13 and 18 only DESIGN BRIEF You are applying to take the reigns of the House of Dior as Design Director, research the background to Dior and the subsequent designers who have held the post to present day, showing you have understood their varying styles and then make your presentation to the ‘House of Dior’ – or rather the competition judges. USING VARIOUS MEDIA WE WOULD LIKE ALL ENTRANTS TO PRODUCE THREE A3 MOOD BOARDS: BOARD 1: This mood board should reflect their chosen direction.
    [Show full text]
  • Controlling Capital Costs in High Performance Office Buildings: 15 Best Practices for Overcoming Cost Barriers in Project Acquisition, Design, and Construction
    Controlling Capital Costs in High Performance Office Buildings: 15 Best Practices for Overcoming Cost Barriers in Project Acquisition, Design, and Construction Shanti Pless, Paul Torcellini: NREL Commercial Buildings Research Group Phil Macey: Haselden Construction Executive Summary First costs, or capital costs, for energy efficiency strategies in office buildings often present a significant barrier to realizing high-performance buildings with 50% or greater energy savings over the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers 90.1-2004 Standard. Historically, the industry has been unable to achieve deep energy savings because it has relied on energy cost savings and simple payback analysis alone to justify investments. A more comprehensive and integrated cost justification and capital cost control approach is needed. First cost barriers can be overcome by implementing innovative procurement and delivery strategies, integrated design principles and cost tradeoffs, life cycle cost justifications, and streamlined construction methods. It is now possible to build marketable, high-performance office buildings that achieve LEED Platinum, save more than $1/ft2 annually in energy costs, and reach net zero energy goals at competitive whole-building first costs. This is illustrated by the U.S. Department of Energy’s and the National Renewable Energy Laboratory’s latest high-performance office building, the Research Support Facility (RSF) on the National Renewable Energy Laboratory’s campus in Golden, Colorado. The RSF is a 220,000-ft2 headquarters and administrative office building with a corporate-scale data center. The RSF reached its energy goals while maintaining a firm fixed price budget at competitive whole-building capital construction costs (move-in ready) of $259/ft2.
    [Show full text]