Tetraspanins in the Regulation of Mast Cell Function

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Tetraspanins in the Regulation of Mast Cell Function Medical Microbiology and Immunology (2020) 209:531–543 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00430-020-00679-x REVIEW Tetraspanins in the regulation of mast cell function Zane Orinska1 · Philipp M. Hagemann1 · Ivana Halova2 · Petr Draber2 Received: 17 February 2020 / Accepted: 6 May 2020 / Published online: 7 June 2020 © The Author(s) 2020 Abstract Mast cells (MCs) are long-living immune cells highly specialized in the storage and release of diferent biologically active compounds and are involved in the regulation of innate and adaptive immunity. MC degranulation and replacement of MC granules are accompanied by active membrane remodelling. Tetraspanins represent an evolutionary conserved family of transmembrane proteins. By interacting with lipids and other membrane and intracellular proteins, they are involved in organisation of membrane protein complexes and act as “molecular facilitators” connecting extracellular and cytoplasmic signaling elements. MCs express diferent tetraspanins and MC degranulation is accompanied by changes in membrane organisation. Therefore, tetraspanins are very likely involved in the regulation of MC exocytosis and membrane reorganisa- tion after degranulation. Antiviral response and production of exosomes are further aspects of MC function characterized by dynamic changes of membrane organization. In this review, we pay a particular attention to tetraspanin gene expression in diferent human and murine MC populations, discuss tetraspanin involvement in regulation of key MC signaling com- plexes, and analyze the potential contribution of tetraspanins to MC antiviral response and exosome production. In-depth knowledge of tetraspanin-mediated molecular mechanisms involved in diferent aspects of the regulation of MC response will be benefcial for patients with allergies, characterized by overwhelming MC reactions. Keywords Tetraspanins · Mast cells · FcεRI · Mast cell degranulation · Allergy · Antiviral immune response · Exosomes Introduction bronchoconstriction) or generalized systemic reactions (e.g., changes in blood pressure during anaphylactic shock) Mast cells (MCs) are long-living cells highly specialized are the consequences of MC response. Mainly associated in the storage and release of diferent biologically active with diferent pathological conditions such as allergies or compounds. Located in diferent tissues and organs in the asthma, MCs are able to recognize pathogens and regulate proximity of blood vessels and nerves, MCs quickly respond local and systemic infammation in the context of protective to changes in the environment by granule exocytosis and immune reaction [1–4]. As cells sensing the environment release of mediators. Organ-restricted local reactions rel- on one hand and changes in organism homeostasis on the evant for the specifc function (e.g., local extravasation, other one, MCs display heterogeneity in granule composi- tion and organization of membrane complexes [5, 6]. Dif- Edited by Charlotte M. de Winde. ferent developmental origin [7, 8] and maturation under the infuence of tissue-specifc microenvironment are at least This article is part of the Special Issue on Tetraspanins in Infection two factors responsible for MC heterogeneity and tissue- and Immunity. specifc MC features. MC degranulation starts by receptor- * Zane Orinska mediated incoming signals followed by reorganisation of [email protected] granules and actin cytoskeleton [9]. These processes end up in granule movement to the cell surface, granule membrane 1 Division of Experimental Pneumology, Research Center fusion with plasma membrane, and granule content release. Borstel, Leibniz Lungenzentrum, Airway Research Center North, German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Borstel, IgE-dependent MC degranulation is an interplay between the Germany high afnity IgE Fc receptor (FcεRI) complex, activator and 2 Department of Signal Transduction, Institute of Molecular inhibitory proteins, membrane lipids, downstream tyrosine Genetics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, kinases, cytoskeletal proteins, as well as proteins and lipids Czech Republic Vol.:(0123456789)1 3 532 Medical Microbiology and Immunology (2020) 209:531–543 involved in granule membrane organization [10–12]. Behind are produced by en bloc duplications [25]. Therefore, it is IgE-antigen binding, MC degranulation could be induced possible that tetraspanins can compensate the absence of by proteases (e.g., thrombin), danger signals (e.g., ATP), each other, leading to mild phenotypes of single tetraspanin toxins, small polycationic compounds, and neuropeptides knockout mice. [13, 14]. Tetraspanins—an evolutionary conserved family Palmitoylation is the post-translational modification of transmembrane proteins—are involved in organisation of where palmitoyl-CoA is enzymatically bound to a thiol membrane protein complexes. Therefore, tetraspanins prob- group of a cysteine [26]. For tetraspanins, this seems to take ably play an important role in the regulation of MC function, place mainly in the Golgi complex, but modifcations at the particularly, in regulation of exocytosis and membrane reor- plasma membrane are also very likely [27]. A recent study ganisation during the degranulation and after degranulation from Rodenburg et al. shows that palmitoylation is a stochas- is completed. tic process rather than being defned by distinct motifs [28]. All tetraspanin proteins can be palmitoylated. Tetraspanins with mutated palmitoylation sites show decreased associa- Introduction to the tetraspanin family tion with their interaction partners including cholesterol [18, of proteins 29]. Ubiquitination is a process by which ubiquitin is enzy- Tetraspanins are membrane glycoproteins consisting of matically coupled to free lysine residues on proteins. Besides 204–393 amino acids with four conserved transmembrane signaling, poly-ubiquitination leads to protein degradation helices, a small extracellular loop EC1 (9–26 amino acids in the proteasome. The Single Subunit Transmembrane E3 long), and a large extracellular loop EC2 (up to 138 amino Ligase Gene Related to Anergy in Lymphocytes (GRAIL) acids long) [15–17]. The EC2, being responsible for binding can ubiquitinate tetraspanins, specifcally at the N-terminus partner proteins, contains a conserved Cys–Cys–Gly amino by binding the EC2 of the tetraspanin [30]. Ubiquitination of acid motif (CCG-motif), two other conserved cysteines, and Tspan6 is critical for interaction with mitochondrial antiviral up to four additional cysteines [18]. The intracellular N- signaling (MAVS) and recruitment of downstream signaling and C-termini are usually short. Characteristic post-trans- proteins [31]. lational modifcations of tetraspanins are N-glycosylation Glycosylation of tetraspanins at asparagines in the EC2 (at asparagines) at the EC2, palmitoylation (at cysteines), is common. Loss of glycosylation leads to multiple efects, and ubiquitination (at lysines) [18]. Cholesterol binding is a e.g., loss of glycosylation in CD151 afects glycosylation of general feature of tetraspanins, since 30 out of 33 human tet- the binding partner of CD151, integrin α3β1 [32]. Likewise, raspanins contain at least one cholesterol-binding motif [19]. in B cells, CD81 is required for CD19 surface expression Interaction between tetraspanins and cholesterol is necessary and proper glycosylation of CD19 depends on CD81 in the and sufcient in the formation of migrasomes—migration- Golgi complex [33]. dependent membrane-bound cellular organelles [20]. Cho- Recently, it was found that the tetraspanin CD37 them- lesterol binding was verifed after solving the structure of selves can take part in signal transduction and could be CD81 [21]. The crystal structure of CD81 also indicates phosphorylated at the N- and C-termini [34]. Whether this that EC2 exists in an open and a closed conformation [21]. observation is human CD37-specifc or B-cell chronic leuke- Tetraspanins were thought to be mixed together in tetraspa- mia cell-restricted, does phosphorylation take place in other nin-enriched microdomains, but super-resolution data indi- tetraspanins bearing identical or similar ITIM-like motifs cate TEMs consisting only of one type of tetraspanin [22]. and whether phosphorylation afects interaction with other Whether tetraspanin distribution in membranes, particularly membrane proteins, should be further investigated. in immune cells, is cell-type specifc is unknown. It is also Altogether, tetraspanins as an evolutionary old mem- unclear whether tetraspanin distribution difers between nor- brane protein family are involved in a variety of diferent mal and malignant cells. Such efects have been described, cellular processes such as cell development, motility, fusion, e.g., for organisation of B-cell receptor complex [23]. and cancer development [18]. Direct association of target In humans, 33 tetraspanins have been identifed so far. proteins with several tetraspanin partners suggests that the The nomenclature of genes and proteins of the tetraspanin function of the target protein could be dependent on associ- family could be found at the HUGO Gene Nomenclature ated tetraspanins [35]. Interacting with other membrane pro- web page (www.genen ames.org). According to phyloge- teins, e.g., integrins, G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), netic analysis, the tetraspanin family members can be sub- a disintegrin and metalloproteases (ADAMs), tetraspanins divided into four groups: the CD family, the CD63 family, are organizing membranes in functional microdomains [36] the uroplakin
Recommended publications
  • Molecular Profile of Tumor-Specific CD8+ T Cell Hypofunction in a Transplantable Murine Cancer Model
    Downloaded from http://www.jimmunol.org/ by guest on September 25, 2021 T + is online at: average * The Journal of Immunology , 34 of which you can access for free at: 2016; 197:1477-1488; Prepublished online 1 July from submission to initial decision 4 weeks from acceptance to publication 2016; doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1600589 http://www.jimmunol.org/content/197/4/1477 Molecular Profile of Tumor-Specific CD8 Cell Hypofunction in a Transplantable Murine Cancer Model Katherine A. Waugh, Sonia M. Leach, Brandon L. Moore, Tullia C. Bruno, Jonathan D. Buhrman and Jill E. Slansky J Immunol cites 95 articles Submit online. Every submission reviewed by practicing scientists ? is published twice each month by Receive free email-alerts when new articles cite this article. Sign up at: http://jimmunol.org/alerts http://jimmunol.org/subscription Submit copyright permission requests at: http://www.aai.org/About/Publications/JI/copyright.html http://www.jimmunol.org/content/suppl/2016/07/01/jimmunol.160058 9.DCSupplemental This article http://www.jimmunol.org/content/197/4/1477.full#ref-list-1 Information about subscribing to The JI No Triage! Fast Publication! Rapid Reviews! 30 days* Why • • • Material References Permissions Email Alerts Subscription Supplementary The Journal of Immunology The American Association of Immunologists, Inc., 1451 Rockville Pike, Suite 650, Rockville, MD 20852 Copyright © 2016 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved. Print ISSN: 0022-1767 Online ISSN: 1550-6606. This information is current as of September 25, 2021. The Journal of Immunology Molecular Profile of Tumor-Specific CD8+ T Cell Hypofunction in a Transplantable Murine Cancer Model Katherine A.
    [Show full text]
  • Regulation of Leukocytes by Tspanc8 Tetraspanins And
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Birmingham Research Portal University of Birmingham Regulation of Leukocytes by TspanC8 Tetraspanins and the “Molecular Scissor” ADAM10 Matthews, Alexandra; Koo, Chek Ziu; Szyroka, Justyna; Harrison, Neale; Kanhere, Aditi; Tomlinson, Michael DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01451 License: Creative Commons: Attribution (CC BY) Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Citation for published version (Harvard): Matthews, A, Koo, CZ, Szyroka, J, Harrison, N, Kanhere, A & Tomlinson, M 2018, 'Regulation of Leukocytes by TspanC8 Tetraspanins and the “Molecular Scissor” ADAM10', Frontiers in immunology, vol. 9, 1451. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2018.01451 Link to publication on Research at Birmingham portal Publisher Rights Statement: Matthews AL, Koo CZ, Szyroka J, Harrison N, Kanhere A and Tomlinson MG (2018) Regulation of Leukocytes by TspanC8 Tetraspanins and the “Molecular Scissor” ADAM10. Front. Immunol. 9:1451. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01451. First published by Frontiers Media. Checked 30/7/18. General rights Unless a licence is specified above, all rights (including copyright and moral rights) in this document are retained by the authors and/or the copyright holders. The express permission of the copyright holder must be obtained for any use of this material other than for purposes permitted by law. •Users may freely distribute the URL that is used to identify this publication. •Users may download and/or print one copy of the publication from the University of Birmingham research portal for the purpose of private study or non-commercial research.
    [Show full text]
  • A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of Β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus
    Page 1 of 781 Diabetes A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus Robert N. Bone1,6,7, Olufunmilola Oyebamiji2, Sayali Talware2, Sharmila Selvaraj2, Preethi Krishnan3,6, Farooq Syed1,6,7, Huanmei Wu2, Carmella Evans-Molina 1,3,4,5,6,7,8* Departments of 1Pediatrics, 3Medicine, 4Anatomy, Cell Biology & Physiology, 5Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, the 6Center for Diabetes & Metabolic Diseases, and the 7Herman B. Wells Center for Pediatric Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202; 2Department of BioHealth Informatics, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, 46202; 8Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN 46202. *Corresponding Author(s): Carmella Evans-Molina, MD, PhD ([email protected]) Indiana University School of Medicine, 635 Barnhill Drive, MS 2031A, Indianapolis, IN 46202, Telephone: (317) 274-4145, Fax (317) 274-4107 Running Title: Golgi Stress Response in Diabetes Word Count: 4358 Number of Figures: 6 Keywords: Golgi apparatus stress, Islets, β cell, Type 1 diabetes, Type 2 diabetes 1 Diabetes Publish Ahead of Print, published online August 20, 2020 Diabetes Page 2 of 781 ABSTRACT The Golgi apparatus (GA) is an important site of insulin processing and granule maturation, but whether GA organelle dysfunction and GA stress are present in the diabetic β-cell has not been tested. We utilized an informatics-based approach to develop a transcriptional signature of β-cell GA stress using existing RNA sequencing and microarray datasets generated using human islets from donors with diabetes and islets where type 1(T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) had been modeled ex vivo. To narrow our results to GA-specific genes, we applied a filter set of 1,030 genes accepted as GA associated.
    [Show full text]
  • Genome-Wide DNA Methylation Profiling Identifies Differential Methylation in Uninvolved Psoriatic Epidermis
    Genome-Wide DNA Methylation Profiling Identifies Differential Methylation in Uninvolved Psoriatic Epidermis Deepti Verma, Anna-Karin Ekman, Cecilia Bivik Eding and Charlotta Enerbäck The self-archived postprint version of this journal article is available at Linköping University Institutional Repository (DiVA): http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-147791 N.B.: When citing this work, cite the original publication. Verma, D., Ekman, A., Bivik Eding, C., Enerbäck, C., (2018), Genome-Wide DNA Methylation Profiling Identifies Differential Methylation in Uninvolved Psoriatic Epidermis, Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 138(5), 1088-1093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jid.2017.11.036 Original publication available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jid.2017.11.036 Copyright: Elsevier http://www.elsevier.com/ Genome-Wide DNA Methylation Profiling Identifies Differential Methylation in Uninvolved Psoriatic Epidermis Deepti Verma*a, Anna-Karin Ekman*a, Cecilia Bivik Edinga and Charlotta Enerbäcka *Authors contributed equally aIngrid Asp Psoriasis Research Center, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Division of Dermatology, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden Corresponding author: Charlotta Enerbäck Ingrid Asp Psoriasis Research Center, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University SE-581 85 Linköping, Sweden Phone: +46 10 103 7429 E-mail: [email protected] Short title Differential methylation in psoriasis Abbreviations CGI, CpG island; DMS, differentially methylated site; RRBS, reduced representation bisulphite sequencing Keywords (max 6) psoriasis, epidermis, methylation, Wnt, susceptibility, expression 1 ABSTRACT Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin disease with both local and systemic components. Genome-wide approaches have identified more than 60 psoriasis-susceptibility loci, but genes are estimated to explain only one third of the heritability in psoriasis, suggesting additional, yet unidentified, sources of heritability.
    [Show full text]
  • 0.5) in Stat3∆/∆ Compared with Stat3flox/Flox
    Supplemental Table 2 Genes down-regulated (<0.5) in Stat3∆/∆ compared with Stat3flox/flox Probe ID Gene Symbol Gene Description Entrez gene ID 1460599_at Ermp1 endoplasmic reticulum metallopeptidase 1 226090 1460463_at H60c histocompatibility 60c 670558 1460431_at Gcnt1 glucosaminyl (N-acetyl) transferase 1, core 2 14537 1459979_x_at Zfp68 zinc finger protein 68 24135 1459747_at --- --- --- 1459608_at --- --- --- 1459168_at --- --- --- 1458718_at --- --- --- 1458618_at --- --- --- 1458466_at Ctsa cathepsin A 19025 1458345_s_at Colec11 collectin sub-family member 11 71693 1458046_at --- --- --- 1457769_at H60a histocompatibility 60a 15101 1457680_a_at Tmem69 transmembrane protein 69 230657 1457644_s_at Cxcl1 chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 1 14825 1457639_at Atp6v1h ATPase, H+ transporting, lysosomal V1 subunit H 108664 1457260_at 5730409E04Rik RIKEN cDNA 5730409E04Rik gene 230757 1457070_at --- --- --- 1456893_at --- --- --- 1456823_at Gm70 predicted gene 70 210762 1456671_at Tbrg3 transforming growth factor beta regulated gene 3 21378 1456211_at Nlrp10 NLR family, pyrin domain containing 10 244202 1455881_at Ier5l immediate early response 5-like 72500 1455576_at Rinl Ras and Rab interactor-like 320435 1455304_at Unc13c unc-13 homolog C (C. elegans) 208898 1455241_at BC037703 cDNA sequence BC037703 242125 1454866_s_at Clic6 chloride intracellular channel 6 209195 1453906_at Med13l mediator complex subunit 13-like 76199 1453522_at 6530401N04Rik RIKEN cDNA 6530401N04 gene 328092 1453354_at Gm11602 predicted gene 11602 100380944 1453234_at
    [Show full text]
  • 4-6 Weeks Old Female C57BL/6 Mice Obtained from Jackson Labs Were Used for Cell Isolation
    Methods Mice: 4-6 weeks old female C57BL/6 mice obtained from Jackson labs were used for cell isolation. Female Foxp3-IRES-GFP reporter mice (1), backcrossed to B6/C57 background for 10 generations, were used for the isolation of naïve CD4 and naïve CD8 cells for the RNAseq experiments. The mice were housed in pathogen-free animal facility in the La Jolla Institute for Allergy and Immunology and were used according to protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and use Committee. Preparation of cells: Subsets of thymocytes were isolated by cell sorting as previously described (2), after cell surface staining using CD4 (GK1.5), CD8 (53-6.7), CD3ε (145- 2C11), CD24 (M1/69) (all from Biolegend). DP cells: CD4+CD8 int/hi; CD4 SP cells: CD4CD3 hi, CD24 int/lo; CD8 SP cells: CD8 int/hi CD4 CD3 hi, CD24 int/lo (Fig S2). Peripheral subsets were isolated after pooling spleen and lymph nodes. T cells were enriched by negative isolation using Dynabeads (Dynabeads untouched mouse T cells, 11413D, Invitrogen). After surface staining for CD4 (GK1.5), CD8 (53-6.7), CD62L (MEL-14), CD25 (PC61) and CD44 (IM7), naïve CD4+CD62L hiCD25-CD44lo and naïve CD8+CD62L hiCD25-CD44lo were obtained by sorting (BD FACS Aria). Additionally, for the RNAseq experiments, CD4 and CD8 naïve cells were isolated by sorting T cells from the Foxp3- IRES-GFP mice: CD4+CD62LhiCD25–CD44lo GFP(FOXP3)– and CD8+CD62LhiCD25– CD44lo GFP(FOXP3)– (antibodies were from Biolegend). In some cases, naïve CD4 cells were cultured in vitro under Th1 or Th2 polarizing conditions (3, 4).
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Table 1: Adhesion Genes Data Set
    Supplementary Table 1: Adhesion genes data set PROBE Entrez Gene ID Celera Gene ID Gene_Symbol Gene_Name 160832 1 hCG201364.3 A1BG alpha-1-B glycoprotein 223658 1 hCG201364.3 A1BG alpha-1-B glycoprotein 212988 102 hCG40040.3 ADAM10 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 10 133411 4185 hCG28232.2 ADAM11 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 11 110695 8038 hCG40937.4 ADAM12 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 12 (meltrin alpha) 195222 8038 hCG40937.4 ADAM12 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 12 (meltrin alpha) 165344 8751 hCG20021.3 ADAM15 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 15 (metargidin) 189065 6868 null ADAM17 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 17 (tumor necrosis factor, alpha, converting enzyme) 108119 8728 hCG15398.4 ADAM19 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 19 (meltrin beta) 117763 8748 hCG20675.3 ADAM20 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 20 126448 8747 hCG1785634.2 ADAM21 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 21 208981 8747 hCG1785634.2|hCG2042897 ADAM21 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 21 180903 53616 hCG17212.4 ADAM22 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 22 177272 8745 hCG1811623.1 ADAM23 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 23 102384 10863 hCG1818505.1 ADAM28 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 28 119968 11086 hCG1786734.2 ADAM29 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 29 205542 11085 hCG1997196.1 ADAM30 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 30 148417 80332 hCG39255.4 ADAM33 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 33 140492 8756 hCG1789002.2 ADAM7 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 7 122603 101 hCG1816947.1 ADAM8 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 8 183965 8754 hCG1996391 ADAM9 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 9 (meltrin gamma) 129974 27299 hCG15447.3 ADAMDEC1 ADAM-like,
    [Show full text]
  • Cellular and Molecular Signatures in the Disease Tissue of Early
    Cellular and Molecular Signatures in the Disease Tissue of Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Stratify Clinical Response to csDMARD-Therapy and Predict Radiographic Progression Frances Humby1,* Myles Lewis1,* Nandhini Ramamoorthi2, Jason Hackney3, Michael Barnes1, Michele Bombardieri1, Francesca Setiadi2, Stephen Kelly1, Fabiola Bene1, Maria di Cicco1, Sudeh Riahi1, Vidalba Rocher-Ros1, Nora Ng1, Ilias Lazorou1, Rebecca E. Hands1, Desiree van der Heijde4, Robert Landewé5, Annette van der Helm-van Mil4, Alberto Cauli6, Iain B. McInnes7, Christopher D. Buckley8, Ernest Choy9, Peter Taylor10, Michael J. Townsend2 & Costantino Pitzalis1 1Centre for Experimental Medicine and Rheumatology, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK. Departments of 2Biomarker Discovery OMNI, 3Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Genentech Research and Early Development, South San Francisco, California 94080 USA 4Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands 5Department of Clinical Immunology & Rheumatology, Amsterdam Rheumatology & Immunology Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 6Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, Policlinico of the University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy 7Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8TA, UK 8Rheumatology Research Group, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing (IIA), University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2WB, UK 9Institute of
    [Show full text]
  • Original Article TSPAN13 Is Overexpressed in ER-Positive Breast Cancers and Contributes to Tumor Progression
    Int J Clin Exp Pathol 2016;9(6):5980-5988 www.ijcep.com /ISSN:1936-2625/IJCEP0020634 Original Article TSPAN13 is overexpressed in ER-positive breast cancers and contributes to tumor progression Zhuchao Zhou, Zihao Cai, Jie Wang, Zhenxin Cai, Jianhua Wu Department of General Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China Received November 26, 2015; Accepted January 26, 2016; Epub June 1, 2016; Published June 15, 2016 Abstract: Tetraspanin-13 (TSPAN13) is a largely uncharacterized member of the tetraspanin superfamily and it plays an important role in the process of human tumorigenesis. In this study, the mRNA levels of TSPAN13 in human normal and breast cancer tissues were analyzed and found to be upregulated by using public Oncomine microarray datasets. Therewith, lentivirus-mediated shRNA was employed to silence TSPAN13 expression in ZR-75-30 breast cancer cells to study the phenotypic and molecular changes. We found that suppression of TSPAN13 expression significantly reduced the growth rate of breast cancer cells in vitro by MTT and colony formation assays. Cell cycle arrest at the G0/G1 phase was monitored by flow cytometry. Downstream signaling study revealed that TSPAN13 knockdown downregulated Bcl-2, p-Akt, and p-mTOR expressions and promoted Caspase-3 cleavage. In a word, our data provided novel and compelling evidences that TSPAN13 might be an anti-cancer target against breast cancer. Keywords: TSPAN13, breast cancer, shRNA, cell proliferation, cell cycle Introduction two short N- and C-terminal cytoplasmic do- mains [4]. Although the function of most mem- Breast cancer (BC) is currently the most fre- bers of the family is currently unknown, a simi- quently diagnosed cancer and the leading gl- lar feature of the tetraspanin is their potential obal cause of cancer-related death in women, to associate with other transmembrane pro- accounting for 23% of cancer diagnoses (1.38 teins forming the so-called tetraspanin web [5, million women) and 14% of cancer deaths 6].
    [Show full text]
  • WO 2019/079361 Al 25 April 2019 (25.04.2019) W 1P O PCT
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization I International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2019/079361 Al 25 April 2019 (25.04.2019) W 1P O PCT (51) International Patent Classification: CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DJ, DK, DM, DO, C12Q 1/68 (2018.01) A61P 31/18 (2006.01) DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, HN, C12Q 1/70 (2006.01) HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IR, IS, JO, JP, KE, KG, KH, KN, KP, KR, KW, KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, (21) International Application Number: MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, PCT/US2018/056167 OM, PA, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, RW, SA, (22) International Filing Date: SC, SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, TN, 16 October 2018 (16. 10.2018) TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW. (25) Filing Language: English (84) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every kind of regional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH, (26) Publication Language: English GM, KE, LR, LS, MW, MZ, NA, RW, SD, SL, ST, SZ, TZ, (30) Priority Data: UG, ZM, ZW), Eurasian (AM, AZ, BY, KG, KZ, RU, TJ, 62/573,025 16 October 2017 (16. 10.2017) US TM), European (AL, AT, BE, BG, CH, CY, CZ, DE, DK, EE, ES, FI, FR, GB, GR, HR, HU, ΓΕ , IS, IT, LT, LU, LV, (71) Applicant: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF MC, MK, MT, NL, NO, PL, PT, RO, RS, SE, SI, SK, SM, TECHNOLOGY [US/US]; 77 Massachusetts Avenue, TR), OAPI (BF, BJ, CF, CG, CI, CM, GA, GN, GQ, GW, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139 (US).
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Vertebrate Tetraspanins: Gene Loss, Retention
    Huang et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2010, 10:306 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/10/306 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access The evolution of vertebrate tetraspanins: gene loss, retention, and massive positive selection after whole genome duplications Shengfeng Huang, Haozheng Tian, Zelin Chen, Ting Yu, Anlong Xu* Abstract Background: The vertebrate tetraspanin family has many features which make it suitable for preserving the imprint of ancient sequence evolution and amenable for phylogenomic analysis. So we believe that an in-depth analysis of the tetraspanin evolution not only provides more complete understanding of tetraspanin biology, but offers new insights into the influence of the two rounds of whole genome duplication (2R-WGD) at the origin of vertebrates. Results: A detailed phylogeny of vertebrate tetraspanins was constructed by using multiple lines of information, including sequence-based phylogenetics, key structural features, intron configuration and genomic synteny. In particular, a total of 38 modern tetraspanin ortholog lineages in bony vertebrates have been identified and subsequently classified into 17 ancestral lineages existing before 2R-WGD. Based on this phylogeny, we found that the ohnolog retention rate of tetraspanins after 2R-WGD was three times as the average (a rate similar to those of transcription factors and protein kinases). This high rate didn’t increase the tetrapanin family size, but changed the family composition, possibly by displacing vertebrate-specific gene lineages with the lineages conserved across deuterostomes. We also found that the period from 2R-WGD to recent time is controlled by gene losses. Meanwhile, positive selection has been detected on 80% of the branches right after 2R-WGDs, which declines significantly on both magnitude and extensity on the following speciation branches.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Table S4. FGA Co-Expressed Gene List in LUAD
    Supplementary Table S4. FGA co-expressed gene list in LUAD tumors Symbol R Locus Description FGG 0.919 4q28 fibrinogen gamma chain FGL1 0.635 8p22 fibrinogen-like 1 SLC7A2 0.536 8p22 solute carrier family 7 (cationic amino acid transporter, y+ system), member 2 DUSP4 0.521 8p12-p11 dual specificity phosphatase 4 HAL 0.51 12q22-q24.1histidine ammonia-lyase PDE4D 0.499 5q12 phosphodiesterase 4D, cAMP-specific FURIN 0.497 15q26.1 furin (paired basic amino acid cleaving enzyme) CPS1 0.49 2q35 carbamoyl-phosphate synthase 1, mitochondrial TESC 0.478 12q24.22 tescalcin INHA 0.465 2q35 inhibin, alpha S100P 0.461 4p16 S100 calcium binding protein P VPS37A 0.447 8p22 vacuolar protein sorting 37 homolog A (S. cerevisiae) SLC16A14 0.447 2q36.3 solute carrier family 16, member 14 PPARGC1A 0.443 4p15.1 peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma, coactivator 1 alpha SIK1 0.435 21q22.3 salt-inducible kinase 1 IRS2 0.434 13q34 insulin receptor substrate 2 RND1 0.433 12q12 Rho family GTPase 1 HGD 0.433 3q13.33 homogentisate 1,2-dioxygenase PTP4A1 0.432 6q12 protein tyrosine phosphatase type IVA, member 1 C8orf4 0.428 8p11.2 chromosome 8 open reading frame 4 DDC 0.427 7p12.2 dopa decarboxylase (aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase) TACC2 0.427 10q26 transforming, acidic coiled-coil containing protein 2 MUC13 0.422 3q21.2 mucin 13, cell surface associated C5 0.412 9q33-q34 complement component 5 NR4A2 0.412 2q22-q23 nuclear receptor subfamily 4, group A, member 2 EYS 0.411 6q12 eyes shut homolog (Drosophila) GPX2 0.406 14q24.1 glutathione peroxidase
    [Show full text]