Kassel, Documenta 5, Idee + Idee / Licht

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Kassel, Documenta 5, Idee + Idee / Licht sediment 30 | 2019 1972, 30.6. – 8.10.: KASSEL, DOCUMENTA 5, IDEE + IDEE / LICHT Günter Herzog m Frühjahr 1971 erhielt Klaus Honnef n the spring of 1971, Klaus Honnef einen Anruf von Jean-Christophe received a telephone call from Amman. Er fragte, ob Honnef Lust Jean-Christophe Amman. He I hätte, bei der documenta 5 mitzu- I asked if Honnef would like to work arbeiten und man sich mit Harald with him on documenta 5 and if he Szeemann, der zum Generalsekretär berufen could meet Harald Szeemann, who had been worden war, in Münster treffen könnte, um dar- appointed Secretary General, in Münster to über zu sprechen. Die beiden Schweizer kannten discuss everything. The two Swiss curators knew Honnef durch seine Arbeit im Aachener Zentrum Honnef through his work at the Zentrum für für aktuelle Kunst – Gegenverkehr und seine be- aktuelle Kunst—Gegenverkehr in Aachen, as well reits zahlreichen und vielfältigen Publikationen. as from his numerous and diverse publications. Auch teilten sie mit ihm ein starkes Interesse an They also shared with him a strong interest in den gleichen Künstlerpersönlichkeiten, wie etwa the same artist personalities, such as Reiner Reiner Ruthenbeck und Hanne Darboven, die Ruthenbeck and Hanne Darboven, whom Honnef Honnef gerade in Münster ausgestellt hatte und had just exhibited in Münster and Szeemann Szeemann 1969 in der Berner Kunsthalle in Live at the Kunsthalle in Berne in 1969 in Live in in your head: When Attitudes become Form, de- your head: When Attitudes Become Form, the ren Untertitel Werke – Konzepte – Prozesse − Si- subtitle of which, Works – Concepts – Processes tuationen – Information bereits auf sein documen- – Situations – Information, already foreshadowed ta-Konzept vorauswies. his documenta concept. Bei ihrem Treffen konnte Honnef wählen, ob er At their meeting, Honnef could choose whether die Abteilung „Prozesskunst“ oder zusammen he wished to take on the “Prozesskunst” (Process mit Konrad Fischer, der sich 1968 mit der Düs- Art) section or, together with Konrad Fischer, seldorfer Ausstellung Prospect 68 einen Namen who had made a name for himself in 1968 with gemacht hatte, die Abteilung „Ideekunst“ über- the exhibition Prospect 68 in Düsseldof, the nehmen wollte. Honnef entschied sich für die “Ideenkunst” (Idea Art) section. Honnef opted „Ideekunst“. Dieser Begriff, so hat Honnef Wilhelm for “Ideenkunst.” This term, as Honnef told Schürmann (s. u.) erzählt, ging zurück auf Szee- Wilhelm Schürmann (see below), was coined mann, der sich damit inhaltlich vom angloame- by Szeemann, who wished to thus differentiate rikanischen Begriff der Concept oder Conceptual himself substantively from the Anglo-American Art absetzen und sein Konzept für die documenta terms of Concept Art and Conceptual Art and to „offener“ halten wollte. Honnef, der noch im sel- keep his own concept for the documenta “more ben Jahr 1971 das erste Buch über Concept Art open.” Honnef, who would publish the first book 127 sediment 30 | 2019 veröffentlichen sollte (siehe hier den Beitrag von on Concept Art that same year (see the essay by Philipp Fernandes do Brito), hatte bereits 1970 für Philipp Fernandes do Brito in this publication), had Dieter Bechtloffs Magazin Kunst, den Vorläufer already guest-edited an issue of Dieter Bechtloff’s des Kunstforum International, ein Heft über Con- Magazin Kunst, the forerunner of Kunstforum cept Art entwickelt, Konrad Fischer 1969 zusam- International, dedicated to Concept Art in 1970. In men mit Rolf Wedewer, dem Direktor des Muse- 1969, Konrad Fischer and Rolf Wedewer, Director ums Morsbroich in Leverkusen, dort unter dem of the Museum Morsbroich in Leverkusen, had Titel Konzeption Conception. Dokumentation einer already curated the first museum exhibition on heutigen Kunstrichtung die erste museale Ausstel- conceptual art in Germany there under the title lung zur Konzeptkunst in Deutschland kuratiert. Konzeption Conception. Dokumentation einer Mit Fischer und Honnef konnte Szeemann die da- heutigen Kunstrichtung. (Documentation of a mals wohl besten Kenner der noch neuen Bewe- Contemporary Art Movement). With Fischer and gung gewinnen. Honnef, Szeemann was able to recruit the best experts on the new movement at the time for his Das offene Konzept-Konzept der documenta, das curatorial team. am Ende offiziell Idee + Idee / Licht hieß (weil Szee- mann die Lichtkünstler, so Honnef zu Schürmann, The open Konzept-concept of the documenta, „nirgends anders unterbringen konnte“), erlaub- which in the end was officially titled Idee + Idee/ te es Honnef und Fischer, mit so verschiedenen Licht (Idea + Idea/Light)—because Szeemann, Werken wie Richard Longs Kreis aus Steinen, die as Honnef explained to Schürmann, “couldn’t er aus der Fulda geholt und in die Mitte des Fride- accommodate the light artists anywhere else”— ricianums platziert hatte, „mit den Wandzeich- allowed Honnef and Fischer to build a “cathedral nungen von Sol LeWitt, den Blättern von Hanne of art,” which “would also be a space of Darboven, den Fotoarbeiten von den Bechers, experience and [..] study,” featuring such diverse die zum ersten Mal auf einer documenta waren, works as Richard Long’s circle of stones, which den Gemälden von Agnes Martin, auch eine Pre- he had taken from the Fulda and placed in the miere, den Fotoarbeiten von Douglas Huebler middle of the Fridericianum, “wall drawings by und dem Bildermessstab von Jan Dibbets“ eine Sol LeWitt, works on paper by Hanne Darboven, „Kunstkathedrale“ zu erbauen, die „auch ein Er- photographic works by the Bechers, who were fahrungs- und […] Erhebungsraum sein“ sollte. participating at the documenta for the first time, paintings by Agnes Martin, also a premiere, In der Auswahl ihrer Künstler hatten Honnef und photographic works by Douglas Huebler and the Fischer freie Hand, aber sie gingen sogar so weit, image measuring rod by Jan Dibbets.” dass sie nicht nur bestimmte Künstlerinnen und Künstler, sondern bestimmte Kunstwerke aussu- Honnef and Fischer were given free hand with chen, also die Auswahl der Werke nicht den Urhe- regard to the selection of their artists, but they berinnen und Urheber überlassen, sondern selbst even went so far as to select not only certain vornehmen wollten, was bei einigen auf Ableh- artists, but particular works of art; that is to say, nung stieß, wie etwa bei Dan Flavin, der schon they did not leave the selection of the works to the seine Absage signalisierte, bevor er überhaupt authors, but wanted to choose these themselves, eingeladen worden war (wozu es dann auch gar which was met with opposition from several nicht mehr kam). Für Klaus Honnef war die Ar- artists, including Dan Flavin, who had already beit an der documenta 5 ein Schlüsselereignis in signaled his rejection before he had even been seinem Prozess des Erkennens und Verstehens invited (which then never happened). For Klaus der Fotografie als Kunst durch die Konzeptkunst. Honnef, the work at documenta 5 was a key event Gerade die provokative ästhetische Frugalität in his process of recognizing and understanding der konzeptuellen Fotografie in ihrem Gegensatz photography as art through conceptual art. The zur elaborierten Opulenz der „künstlerischen“ provocative aesthetic frugality of conceptual 128 sediment 30 | 2019 Illustrierten- und Werbefotografie erschien ihm photography in its contrast to the elaborate als das Eigentliche dieser Kunst, und so begann opulence of “artistic” magazine and advertising die kunsthistorische Karriere von Bernd und Hilla photography seemed to him to be the very Becher als, so Honnef, „herausragende Promoto- essence of this art. Thus, according to Honnef, ren der künstlerischen Fotografie in Deutschland“ Bernd and Hilla Becher’s art-historical career as mit ihrer Platzierung als Konzeptkünstler in der “outstanding promoters of artistic photography documenta 5. in Germany” began with their contextualization as conceptual artists at documenta 5. Szeemanns documenta sollte nicht, wie ihre Vor- gängerinnen, ein „Museum der 100 Tage“, son- Unlike its predecessors, Szeemann’s documenta dern ein „Ereignis der 100 Tage“ werden. Keine was not intended to be a “museum of 100 documenta hat im Lauf ihrer Rezeptionsgeschich- days,” but rather an “event of 100 days.” In the te eine so diametrale Umwertung erfahren wie course of its history of reception, no documenta diese, die als erste dem sich damals radikal ver- had undergone such a diametrical reevaluation ändernden Kunstbegriff Rechnung trug und heute as this; it was the first to take account of the allgemein als wichtigste gilt, aber noch während radically changing concept of art at the time sie lief und besonders im Jahr danach höchst and is now generally regarded as the most umstritten war. Harald Szeemann hatte sie als important documenta, despite the fact that it freier Ausstellungsmacher kuratiert. Er war da- was highly controversial while it was still running mals, in der Zeit der „Macher“ („Filmemacher“, and especially in the year that followed. Harald „Liedermacher“), die erste, lange Zeit die einzige Szeemann had organized the exhibition as a und bis heute prominenteste Verkörperung eines freelance curator (Ger.: Ausstellungsmacher, freien, nicht an eine öffentliche Institution gebun- literally “exhibition maker”). At that time, in denen Kurators. Umso problematischer war der the era of the “makers,” such as Filmemacher Umstand, dass man Szeemann für das finanzielle (filmmakers) and Liedermacher (singer- Defizit der documenta 5 haftbar machen wollte. songwriters), he was the first, for a long
Recommended publications
  • Strategic Anomalies: Art & Language in the Art School 1969-1979
    Strategic Anomalies: Art & Language in the Art School 1969-1979 Dennis, M. Submitted version deposited in Coventry University’s Institutional Repository Original citation: Dennis, M. () Strategic Anomalies: Art & Language in the Art School 1969-1979. Unpublished MSC by Research Thesis. Coventry: Coventry University Copyright © and Moral Rights are retained by the author. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This item cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Some materials have been removed from this thesis due to Third Party Copyright. Pages where material has been removed are clearly marked in the electronic version. The unabridged version of the thesis can be viewed at the Lanchester Library, Coventry University. Strategic Anomalies: Art & Language in ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ the Art School 1969-1979 ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Mark Dennis ​ ​ A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the University’s ​ ​​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ requirements for the Degree of Master of Philosophy/Master of ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Research September 2016 ​ ​ Library Declaration and Deposit Agreement Title: Forename: Family Name: Mark Dennis Student ID: Faculty: Award: 4744519 Arts & Humanities PhD Thesis Title: Strategic Anomalies: Art & Language in the Art School 1969-1979 Freedom of Information: Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA) ensures access to any information held by Coventry University, including theses, unless an exception or exceptional circumstances apply. In the interest of scholarship, theses of the University are normally made freely available online in the Institutions Repository, immediately on deposit.
    [Show full text]
  • Art and Language 14Th November – 18Th January 2003 52 - 54 Bell Street
    Art and Language 14th November – 18th January 2003 52 - 54 Bell Street Lisson Gallery is delighted to announce an exhibition by Art & Language. Art and Language played a key role in the birth of Conceptual Art both theoretically and in terms of the work produced. The name Art & Language was first used by Michael Baldwin, David Bainbridge, Harold Hurrell and Terry Atkinson in 1968 to describe their collaborative work which had been taking place since 1966-67 and as the title of the journal dedicated to the theoretical and critical issues of conceptual art. The collaboration widened between 1969 and 1970 to include Ian Burn, Mel Ramsden, Joseph Kosuth and Charles Harrison. The collaborative nature of the venture was conceived by the artists as offering a critical inquiry into the social, philosophical and psychological position of the artist which they regarded as mystification. By the mid-1970s a large body of critical and theoretical as well as artistic works had developed in the form of publications, indexes, records, texts, performances and paintings. Since 1977, Art and Language has been identified with the collaborative work of Michael Baldwin and Mel Ramsden and with the theoretical and critical collaboration of these two with Charles Harrison. The process of indexing lies at the heart of the endeavours of Art and Language. One such project that will be included in the exhibition is Wrongs Healed in Official Hope, a remaking of an earlier index, Index 01, produced by Art & Language for the Documenta of 1972. Whereas Index 01 was intended as a functioning tool in the recovery and public understanding of Art and Language, Wrongs Healed in Official Hope is a ‘logical implosion’ of these early indexes as conversations questioning the process of indexing became the material of the indexing project itself.
    [Show full text]
  • Conceptual Art in Britain 1964–1979 Art & Language Large Print Guide
    Conceptual Art in Britain 1964–1979 12 April – 29 August 2016 Art & Language Large Print Guide Please return to exhibition entrance Art & Language 1 To focus on reading rather than looking marked a huge shift for art. Language was to be used as art to question art. It would provide a scientific and critical device to address what was wrong with modernist abstract painting, and this approach became the basis for the activity of the Art & Language group, active from about 1967. They investigated how and under what conditions the naming of art takes place, and suggested that meaning in art might lie not with the material object itself, but with the theoretical argument underpinning it. By 1969 the group that constituted Art & Language started to grow. They published a magazine Art-Language and their practice became increasingly rooted in group discussions like those that took place on their art theory course at Coventry College of Art. Theorising here was not subsidiary to art or an art object but the primary activity for these artists. 2 Wall labels Clockwise from right of wall text Art & Language (Mel Ramsden born 1944) Secret Painting 1967–8 Two parts, acrylic paint on canvas and framed Photostat text Mel Ramsden first made contact with Art & Language in 1969. He and Ian Burn were then published in the second and third issues of Art-Language. The practice he had evolved, primarily with Ian Burn, in London and then after 1967 in New York was similar to the critical position regarding modernism that Terry Atkinson and Michael Baldwin were exploring.
    [Show full text]
  • Conceptual Art: a Critical Anthology
    Conceptual Art: A Critical Anthology Alexander Alberro Blake Stimson, Editors The MIT Press conceptual art conceptual art: a critical anthology edited by alexander alberro and blake stimson the MIT press • cambridge, massachusetts • london, england ᭧1999 Massachusetts Institute of Technology All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying, recording, or information storage and retrieval)without permission in writing from the publisher. This book was set in Adobe Garamond and Trade Gothic by Graphic Composition, Inc. and was printed and bound in the United States of America. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Conceptual art : a critical anthology / edited by Alexander Alberro and Blake Stimson. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-262-01173-5 (hc : alk. paper) 1. Conceptual art. I. Alberro, Alexander. II. Stimson, Blake. N6494.C63C597 1999 700—dc21 98-52388 CIP contents ILLUSTRATIONS xii PREFACE xiv Alexander Alberro, Reconsidering Conceptual Art, 1966–1977 xvi Blake Stimson, The Promise of Conceptual Art xxxviii I 1966–1967 Eduardo Costa, Rau´ l Escari, Roberto Jacoby, A Media Art (Manifesto) 2 Christine Kozlov, Compositions for Audio Structures 6 He´lio Oiticica, Position and Program 8 Sol LeWitt, Paragraphs on Conceptual Art 12 Sigmund Bode, Excerpt from Placement as Language (1928) 18 Mel Bochner, The Serial Attitude 22 Daniel Buren, Olivier Mosset, Michel Parmentier, Niele Toroni, Statement 28 Michel Claura, Buren, Mosset, Toroni or Anybody 30 Michael Baldwin, Remarks on Air-Conditioning: An Extravaganza of Blandness 32 Adrian Piper, A Defense of the “Conceptual” Process in Art 36 He´lio Oiticica, General Scheme of the New Objectivity 40 II 1968 Lucy R.
    [Show full text]
  • 01 Titlepage
    Systems, Contexts, Relations: An Alternative Genealogy of Conceptual Art A thesis submitted to Middlesex University in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Luke Skrebowski Centre for Research in Modern European Philosophy/History of Art and Design Middlesex University September 2009 Acknowledgments I would like to thank the following people: Professor Peter Osborne; Professor Jon Bird; the staff and students of the Centre for Research in Modern European Philosophy, Middlesex University; Hans Haacke; Mel Bochner; Chris and Jane Skrebowski; Suzi Winstanley. The research and writing of this thesis were supported by an AHRC Doctoral Award and a Gabriel Parker Travel Bursary from Middlesex University. i Abstract Recent scholarship has revisited conceptual art in light of its ongoing influence on contemporary art, arguing against earlier accounts of the practice which gave a restricted account of its scope and stressed its historical foreclosure. Yet conceptual art remains both historically and theoretically underspecified, its multiple and often conflicting genealogies have not all been convincingly traced. This thesis argues for the importance of a systems genealogy of conceptual art—culminating in a distinctive mode of systematic conceptual art—as a primary determinant of the conceptual genealogy of contemporary art. It claims that from the perspective of post-postmodern, relational and context art, the contemporary significance of conceptual art can best be understood in light of its “systematic” mode. The distinctiveness of contemporary art, and the problems associated with its uncertain critical character, have to be understood in relation to the unresolved problems raised by conceptual art and the implications that these have held for art’s post-conceptual trajectory.
    [Show full text]
  • Poetry Beyond Illocution Frank Davey
    Document generated on 09/27/2021 2:34 a.m. Studies in Canadian Literature / Études en littérature canadienne Poetry beyond Illocution Frank Davey Volume 41, Number 1, 2016 Article abstract Visual and conceptual poetry became significant practices in Canada in the late URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/scl41_1art08 1950s and 1960s as part of a dissatisfaction with what Antony Easthope in 1986 would call a moribund “bourgeois poetic discourse,” “the poetry of the ‘single See table of contents voice.’” The latter, however, would continue to survive in school anthologies and arts council policies as a protected form, while the new non-discursive poetries found most of their audiences in art galleries, libraries, music clubs, Publisher(s) on the internet, and as often through international presentation as Canadian. The result has been a rich accumulation of visual and conceptual poetry, with The University of New Brunswick its own major figures, that is little understood or studied nationally and often better known and appreciated outside of Canada than within. ISSN 0380-6995 (print) 1718-7850 (digital) Explore this journal Cite this article Davey, F. (2016). Poetry beyond Illocution. Studies in Canadian Literature / Études en littérature canadienne, 41(1), 162–181. © 2016. All rights reserved. This document is protected by copyright law. Use of the services of Érudit (including reproduction) is subject to its terms and conditions, which can be viewed online. https://apropos.erudit.org/en/users/policy-on-use/ This article is disseminated and preserved by Érudit. Érudit is a non-profit inter-university consortium of the Université de Montréal, Université Laval, and the Université du Québec à Montréal.
    [Show full text]
  • Conceptual Art in Britain 1964–1979 Timeline Large Print Guide
    Conceptual Art in Britain 1964–1979 12 April – 29 August 2016 Timeline Large Print Guide Please return to exhibition entrance Contents 1964 Page 1 1965 Page 3 1966 Page 6 1967 Page 9 1968 Page 12 1969 Page 16 1970 Page 23 1971 Page 30 1972 Page 36 1973 Page 41 1974 Page 46 1975 Page 50 1976 Page 54 1977 Page 57 1978 Page 60 1979 Page 63 1964 1 AUG The Centre for Advanced Creative Study publishes Signals Newsbulletin, a forum for the discussion of experimental art exhibitions and events. It also includes poetry and essays on science and technology. The group becomes known as Signals London when it moves to premises in Wigmore Street in central London. The gallery closes in 1966. OCT The Labour party wins the general election under the leadership of Harold Wilson. Wilson speaks about the need ‘to think and speak in the language of our scientific age’. 2 1965 3 FEB Arts minister Jennie Lee publishes the first (and only) white paper on the arts – A Policy for the Arts. She argues that the arts must occupy a central place in British life and be part of everyday life for children and adults. She announces a 30% increase to the Arts Council grant. JUL Comprehensive education system replaces grammar and secondary modern schools, aiming to serve all pupils on an equal basis. Between Poetry and Painting Institute of Contemporary Arts, London 22 October – 27 November Curated by Jasia Reichardt Includes: Barry Flanagan, John Latham 4 NOV Indica gallery and bookshop opens at Mason’s Yard, London.
    [Show full text]
  • Art & Language and Ilya Kabakov THE
    SPROVIERI Art & Language and Ilya Kabakov THE NON-OBJECTIVE WORLD exhibiIon 30 sep - 19 nov preview 29 sep 6 - 8 pm 23 heddon street london w1b 4bq sprovieri.com +44 (0) 20 7734 2066 Sprovieri is pleased to present Art & Language and Ilya Kabakov in THE NON-OBJECTIVE WORLD. The exhibiIon revisits the radical, early 20th century theoreIcal departure spelled out by Kasimir Malevich in his book, The Non-ObjecIve World, not through his original Black SQuare painIngs, but through related works by the important living conceptual arIsts, Art & Language (Michael Baldwin and Mel Ramsden) and Ilya Kabakov. As conceptual arIsts each has absorbed, over the last 50 years, the impact which Malevich has had on modern art and turned it into something of their own. For the first Ime, in a joint collaboraIon between Sprovieri and Jill Silverman van Coenegrachts, this connecIon between the greatest and most original abstract arIst with leading conceptual arIsts of our Ime is explored. Malevich’s book on SupremaIsm The Non-ObjecIve World, was first published by the Bauhaus Press in German in 1927, but not in English unIl 1959. Michael Baldwin bought a copy in 1965. “Malevich had a certain glamour, the glamour of radicality, which every twenty year-old is searching for in their own spoay way…” he explains in an interview with Silverman van Coenegrachts. Baldwin, ader reading the Malevich book, was inspired to make a series of installaIon works based on ideas from the text. Three of which are currently in private and insItuIonal collecIons, the remaining three installaIons from 1965 – Two SupremaIst SQuares in two variaIons and Ten SupremaIst SQuares – have come directly from the arIst's studio for the first Ime and will be included in this exhibiIon.
    [Show full text]
  • British Art Studies July 2016 British Sculpture Abroad, 1945 – 2000
    British Art Studies July 2016 British Sculpture Abroad, 1945 – 2000 Edited by Penelope Curtis and Martina Droth British Art Studies Issue 3, published 4 July 2016 British Sculpture Abroad, 1945 – 2000 Edited by Penelope Curtis and Martina Droth Cover image: Installation View, Simon Starling, Project for a Masquerade (Hiroshima), 2010–11, 16 mm film transferred to digital (25 minutes, 45 seconds), wooden masks, cast bronze masks, bowler hat, metals stands, suspended mirror, suspended screen, HD projector, media player, and speakers. Dimensions variable. Digital image courtesy of the artist PDF generated on 21 July 2021 Note: British Art Studies is a digital publication and intended to be experienced online and referenced digitally. PDFs are provided for ease of reading offline. Please do not reference the PDF in academic citations: we recommend the use of DOIs (digital object identifiers) provided within the online article. Theseunique alphanumeric strings identify content and provide a persistent link to a location on the internet. A DOI is guaranteed never to change, so you can use it to link permanently to electronic documents with confidence. Published by: Paul Mellon Centre 16 Bedford Square London, WC1B 3JA https://www.paul-mellon-centre.ac.uk In partnership with: Yale Center for British Art 1080 Chapel Street New Haven, Connecticut https://britishart.yale.edu ISSN: 2058-5462 DOI: 10.17658/issn.2058-5462 URL: https://www.britishartstudies.ac.uk Editorial team: https://www.britishartstudies.ac.uk/about/editorial-team Advisory board:
    [Show full text]
  • Artist Writings: Critical Essays, Reception, and Conditions of Production Since the 60S
    Artist Writings: Critical Essays, Reception, and Conditions of Production since the 60s by Leanne Katherine Carroll A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy—History of Art Department of Art University of Toronto © Copyright by Leanne Katherine Carroll 2013 Artist Writings: Critical Essays, Reception, and Conditions of Production since the 60s Leanne Carroll Doctor of Philosophy—History of Art Department of Art University of Toronto 2013 Abstract This dissertation uncovers the history of what is today generally accepted in the art world, that artists are also artist-writers. I analyse a shift from writing by artists as an ostensible aberration to artist writing as practice. My structuring methodology is assessing artist writings and their conditions and reception in their moment of production and in their singularity. In Part 1, I argue that, while the Abstract-Expressionist artist-writers were negatively received, a number of AbEx- inflected conditions influenced and made manifest the valuing of artist writings. I demonstrate that Donald Judd conceived of writing as stemming from the same methods and responsibilities of the artist—following the guiding principle that art comes from art, from taking into account developments of the recent past—and as an essayistic means to argumentatively air his extra-art concerns; that writing for Dan Graham was an art world right of entry; and that Robert Smithson treated words as primary substances in a way that complicates meaning in his articles and in his objects and earthworks, in the process introducing a modernist truth to materials that gave the writing cachet while also serving as the basis for its domestication.
    [Show full text]
  • The Robert C. Morgan Conceptual Art Collection of Correspondence
    The Robert C. Morgan Conceptual Art Collection of Correspondence, Interviews, Artists’ Books, Monographs, Catalogs, and Ephemera Featuring John Baldessari, Robert Barry, Douglas Huebler, Sol LeWitt, and Lawrence Weiner Robert C. Morgan (b. 1943) is an internationally renowned American art critic, art historian, curator, lecturer, poet, and painter. He completed his dissertation, “The Role of Documentation in Conceptual Art: An Aesthetic Inquiry,” at New York University (School of Education) in 1978. It was the first dissertation on Conceptual Art in the U.S. and was later rewritten, updated and published as Conceptual Art: An American Perspective (McFarland & Company, 1994). The present collection springs from Morgan’s assiduous research and writing, and provides copious evidence of and discerning insight into the enduring phenomenon of Conceptual art, with particular attention to Lawrence Weiner, Robert Barry, Peter Downsbrough, John Baldessari, Dan Graham, Douglas Huebler, Seth Siegelaub, Allan Kaprow, Joseph Kosuth, Sol LeWitt, and Ed Ruscha, to name a few. The collection includes artists’ books, monographs, catalogs, cards, posters, recordings, correspondence, manuscripts, typescripts, and so forth, and represents the work of more than 100 artists, writers, curators, and editors. From John Baldessari’s Throwing Three Balls in the Air to Get a Straight Line (Best of Thirty-Six Attempts). Morgan has curated retrospectives of Allan Kaprow and Komar and Melamid, as well as many other exhibitions including such artists as Carolee Schneemann, Robert Barry, Douglas Huebler, Mel Bochner, and Muntadas. In addition to Conceptual Art: An American Perspective, Morgan is the author of Art into Ideas: Essays on Conceptual Art (Cambridge University Press, 1996), Between Modernism and Conceptual Art (McFarland, 1997), The End of the Art World (Allworth Press, 1998), Robert Barry (Karl Kerber Verlag, 1986), and Bernar Venet 1961–1970 (Éditions des Cahiers intempestifs,1999), among many other articles and books.
    [Show full text]
  • Explorations in (Post) Modern Thought and Visual Culture Christiane Treichl Christiane
    Explorations in (Post) Modern Thought and Visual Culture Christiane Treichl Christiane Art and Language: Explorations in (Post) Modern Thought and Visual Culture sheds new light on the symbiotic relationship between art and Christiane Treichl language by exploring how these cultured sets consociate on philo- sophical and art-historical levels. Against the backdrop of (visual) semi- otics the first section of the book considers the differences between art and language from various vantage points: meaning-making, asking if art is a language, Ernst Cassirer's symbolic forms, Jan Mukařovský's signs, and Gilles Deleuze's philosophy. The second section of the book deals with the works of (post) modern artists from diverse cultural backgrounds who unfasten traditional linguistic and artistic systems by destabilising the viewer and blurring the boundaries between art and language. The author argues that this is the most productive, cut- ting-edge aspect of the word-image relationship of that period. Lan- guage provides (post) modern art with its thrust and focus and offers a site for critical intervention. The artistic forays the author embarks on cover a wide range touching on Surrealism, Dada, Arabic Calligraphy, and Chinese Conceptualist Art. Explorations in (Post) Modern Thought and Visual Culture Visual Thought and Modern Explorations in (Post) ISBN 978-3-7376-0196-2 9 783737 601962 kassel university press ! " !#$% # & ' !#( # ) % #* *+++ , ' #+*+-
    [Show full text]