DOCSLIB.ORG

Modelling and Measurement of Simple and Complex DNA Damage Induction by Ion Irradiation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Modelling and Measurement of Simple and Complex DNA Damage Induction by Ion Irradiation Modelling and Measurement of Simple and Complex DNA Damage Induction by Ion Irradiation A thesis submitted to the University of Manchester for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health 2018 Nicholas T. Henthorn School of Medical Sciences Division of Cancer Sciences Contents 1. Introduction ...................................................................................17 1.1 Cancer ............................................................................................... 17 1.1.1 Incidence and Prevalence............................................................................. 17 1.1.2 Biology ............................................................................................................. 17 1.2 External Beam Radiotherapy .......................................................... 18 1.2.2 In Practice ........................................................................................................ 18 1.2.2 Photons ............................................................................................................ 19 1.2.3 Particles ........................................................................................................... 24 1.3 Proton Beam Therapy ..................................................................... 25 1.3.1 Delivery Techniques ...................................................................................... 27 1.3.2 Benefits ............................................................................................................ 30 1.3.3 Linear Energy Transfer .................................................................................. 31 1.3.4 Uncertainties and Areas of Research ......................................................... 34 1.4 Relative Biological Effectiveness .................................................. 36 1.4.1 Definition .......................................................................................................... 36 1.4.2 Experimental Data .......................................................................................... 39 1.4.3 RBE = 1.1 ........................................................................................................ 43 1.4.4 Clinical Implications ....................................................................................... 44 1.4.5 Phenomenological Models ............................................................................ 45 1.5 DNA Damage, Nanodosimetry, and DNA Repair .......................... 50 1.6 Modelling .......................................................................................... 54 1.6.1 Current Models ............................................................................................... 56 1.6.2 Mechanistic Models ....................................................................................... 61 1.6.3 Track Structure Codes................................................................................... 63 1.7 Geant4-DNA ...................................................................................... 66 1.7.1 Physics ............................................................................................................. 66 1.7.2 Chemistry......................................................................................................... 69 1.8 Summary and Aims ......................................................................... 70 2. Nanodosimetric Simulation of Direct Ion-Induced DNA Damage Using Different Chromatin Geometry Models ...............73 2.1 Introduction ...................................................................................... 76 2.2 Methods............................................................................................. 79 2.2.1 Model of DNA and Chromatin Geometries................................................. 79 2.2.2 Track Structure Simulation and Irradiation Details ................................... 81 2.2.3 Scoring of Clusters ......................................................................................... 82 2 2.2.4 Nanodosimetric Parameters ......................................................................... 83 2.3 Results .............................................................................................. 84 2.3.1 Damaged Backbone Cluster Size Distribution........................................... 84 2.3.2 Conditional Average Cluster Size (m1) ....................................................... 86 2.3.3 Relative Cumulative Distributions (F2 and F3) ........................................... 87 2.3.4 SSB to DSB Ratio .......................................................................................... 89 2.3.5 The Effect of Backbone Size ........................................................................ 90 2.4 Discussion ........................................................................................ 92 2.4.1 Chromatin Model Comparison ..................................................................... 92 2.4.2 Damage Complexity....................................................................................... 93 2.5 Summary and Conclusions ............................................................ 95 2.6 Acknowledgements ......................................................................... 96 3. Nanodosimetric Simulation of DNA Damage from Protons and Across a Clinically Relevant Proton Spread Out Bragg Peak with Direct and Indirect Effects ...............................................................97 3.1 Introduction ...................................................................................... 99 3.2 Methods........................................................................................... 101 3.2.1 Models of DNA Geometry ........................................................................... 101 3.2.2 Track Structure Simulation ......................................................................... 104 3.2.3 Direct and Indirect DNA Damage .............................................................. 105 3.2.4 Damage Classification ................................................................................. 106 3.2.5 Simulation of Plasmid Irradiation ............................................................... 108 3.2.6 Simulation of Chromatin Fibre Irradiation ................................................. 110 3.2.7 Total Damage Yields in a Cell Model ........................................................ 111 3.3 Results ............................................................................................ 112 3.3.1 Direct DNA Damage - Plasmid Irradiation ................................................ 112 3.3.2 Indirect DNA Damage – Chromatin Irradiation ........................................ 113 3.3.3 Damage Complexity..................................................................................... 114 3.3.4 Damage Complexity Distribution ............................................................... 116 3.3.5 Clinically Relevant Considerations ............................................................ 118 3.4 Discussion ...................................................................................... 119 3.5 Summary and Conclusions .......................................................... 122 3.6 Acknowledgements ....................................................................... 123 4. In Silico Non-Homologous End Joining Following Ion Induced DNA Double Strand Breaks Predicts That Repair Fidelity Depends on Break Density ........................................................... 124 3 4.1 Introduction .................................................................................... 126 4.2 Methods........................................................................................... 129 4.2.1 Simulation of DSBs ...................................................................................... 129 4.2.2 Non-Homologous End Joining Repair Model .......................................... 130 4.2.3 Data Availability ............................................................................................ 131 4.3 Results ............................................................................................ 131 4.3.1 Misrepair and LET ........................................................................................ 131 4.3.2 Cluster Density, Misrepair, and Residual DSBs ...................................... 134 4.3.3 Residual and Misrepaired DSB Yields ...................................................... 137 4.4 Discussion and Conclusions ....................................................... 139 4.5 Acknowledgements ....................................................................... 143 5. SDD: A Standardised Data Format to Record DNA Damage 144 5.1 Introduction .................................................................................... 145 5.2 The New Standard to Record DNA Damage ............................... 148 5.2.1 Website and Updates .................................................................................. 149 5.2.2 Header ........................................................................................................... 149 5.2.3 The Data Block ............................................................................................. 154 5.2.4 Dissemination and Repository ................................................................... 162 5.3 Discussion and Conclusions ......................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • (Maas) As Safe and Natural Protective Agents Against UV-Induced Skin Damage
    antioxidants Review Exploring Mycosporine-Like Amino Acids (MAAs) as Safe and Natural Protective Agents against UV-Induced Skin Damage Anjali Singh ,Mária Cˇ ížková, KateˇrinaBišová and Milada Vítová * Laboratory of Cell Cycles of Algae, Centre Algatech, Institute of Microbiology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Novohradská 237, 379 81 Tˇreboˇn,Czech Republic; [email protected] (A.S.); [email protected] (M.C.);ˇ [email protected] (K.B.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Prolonged exposure to harmful ultraviolet radiation (UVR) can induce many chronic or acute skin disorders in humans. To protect themselves, many people have started to apply cosmetic products containing UV-screening chemicals alone or together with physical sunblocks, mainly based on titanium–dioxide (TiO2) or zinc-oxide (ZnO2). However, it has now been shown that the use of chemical and physical sunblocks is not safe for long-term application, so searches for the novel, natural UV-screening compounds derived from plants or bacteria are gaining attention. Certain photosynthetic organisms such as algae and cyanobacteria have evolved to cope with exposure to UVR by producing mycosporine-like amino acids (MAAs). These are promising substitutes for chemical sunscreens containing commercially available sunblock filters. The use of biopolymers such as chitosan for joining MAAs together or with MAA-Np (nanoparticles) conjugates will provide Citation: Singh, A.; Cížková,ˇ M.; stability to MAAs similar to the mixing of chemical and physical sunscreens. This review critically Bišová, K.; Vítová, M. Exploring describes UV-induced skin damage, problems associated with the use of chemical and physical Mycosporine-Like Amino Acids (MAAs) as Safe and Natural sunscreens, cyanobacteria as a source of MAAs, the abundance of MAAs and their biotechnological Protective Agents against applications.
    [Show full text]
  • Solar Ultraviolet Radiation Dosimetry and Epidemiology
    Solar Ultraviolet Radiation Dosimetry and Epidemiology Dr. Elizabeth Cahoon Earl Stadtman Investigator Radiation Epidemiology Branch Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics [email protected] DCEG Radiation Epidemiology and Dosimetry Course 2019 www.dceg.cancer.gov/RadEpiCourse Overview . Background on UV radiation (UVR) . UVR exposure assessment . Health risks . Health benefits . Summary 2 Background on UV radiation 3 Public health importance . Prevention (identify susceptible populations) . Consumer products . Medical radiation guidelines . Insights into carcinogenesis 4 Annual economic burden of skin cancer in the United States . Treatment: $8.1 billion (Guy et al., 2015) . $4.8 billion for keratinocyte carcinomas (basal and squamous cell skin cancer) . $3.3 billion for melanoma U.S. Surgeon General’s Call to Action to Prevent Skin Cancer (2014) UV radiation exposure assessment 6 http://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/causes-prevention/risk/radiation/electromagnetic-fields-fact-sheet 7 Solar radiation spectrum 95% of UVA: 315-400 nm 5% of UVB: 280-315 nm Individual measures of UVR . Susceptibility (light skin/hair/eye pigmentation) . Self-reported time outdoors . Outdoor/indoor occupation . Tanning bed use . Lack of sunscreen use/protective clothing . Sunburns 9 Environmental measures of UVR . Proximity to the Equator . Ambient UVR . Ground-based . Satellite-based 10 . Satellite circled Earth once a day near noontime . Validated by ground-based measurements . 10 latitude by 10 longitude global grid . Several wavelengths available Nimbus -7 Satellite (1978-1993) Satellite-based ambient UVR . Earth-sun distance . Time of year . Latitude . Column ozone . Cloud optical thickness http://toms.gsfc.nasa.gov/n7toms/nim7toms_v8.html 12 Satellite-based erythemal exposure model http://macuv.gsfc.nasa.gov/doc/erynotes.pdf UV radiation spectrum UVA: 320-400 nm 95% reaches Earth’s surface UVB: 290-320 nm 5% reaches Earth’s surface UVC: 100-290 nm 0% reaches Earth’s surface Skin erythema (reddening) response to various UVR wavelengths UVB UVA Characteristics of UVB .
    [Show full text]
  • Ultraviolet Radiation, Aging and the Skin: Prevention of Damage by Topical Camp Manipulation
    Molecules 2014, 19, 6202-6219; doi:10.3390/molecules19056202 OPEN ACCESS molecules ISSN 1420-3049 www.mdpi.com/journal/molecules Review Ultraviolet Radiation, Aging and the Skin: Prevention of Damage by Topical cAMP Manipulation Alexandra Amaro-Ortiz 1, Betty Yan 1 and John A. D’Orazio 1,2,* 1 The Graduate Center for Toxicology, the Markey Cancer Center and the Department of Pediatrics, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, 800 Rose Street, Lexington, KY 40536, USA 2 Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Combs Research Building 204, 800 Rose Street, Lexington, KY 40536-0096, USA * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-859-323-6238; Fax: +1-859-257-8940. Received: 26 April 2014; in revised form: 8 May 2014 / Accepted: 13 May 2014 / Published: 15 May 2014 Abstract: Being the largest and most visible organ of the body and heavily influenced by environmental factors, skin is ideal to study the long-term effects of aging. Throughout our lifetime, we accumulate damage generated by UV radiation. UV causes inflammation, immune changes, physical changes, impaired wound healing and DNA damage that promotes cellular senescence and carcinogenesis. Melanoma is the deadliest form of skin cancer and among the malignancies of highest increasing incidence over the last several decades. Melanoma incidence is directly related to age, with highest rates in individuals over the age of 55 years, making it a clear age-related disease. In this review, we will focus on UV-induced carcinogenesis and photo aging along with natural protective mechanisms that reduce amount of “realized” solar radiation dose and UV-induced injury.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and Chemical Sciences
    ISSN: 0975-8585 Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and Chemical Sciences Sunscreens Containing Various Herbs For Protecting Skin From UV Sunray. Zainab Tuama Al-Dallee, and Kawther T. Khalaf*. Pharmacognosay Department, College of Pharmacy, University of Basra, Basra, Iraq, 2Clinical laboratory science Department, College of Pharmacy, University of Basra, Basra, Iraq. ABSTRACT Overexposure to sun ultraviolet (UV) radiation is the main external cause of skin damage, and thus it is a factor in aging skin and increasing the risk of skin cancer, which speeds up skin aging and raises the risk of skin cancer. The students have tended to use sunscreens containing plant extracts as a substitute for sunscreen that contains organic compounds causing allergic. Plant‐based sunscreens are used to protect skin cells and DNA damage from UV rays due to they contain antioxidant compounds that restricts free radical activity. In addition to their antioxidant properties, plant‐products contain polyphenols like flavonoids and carotenoids. Therefore, the aim of the research is to present a review of the plant species generally applied in sunblock to save the skin from UV rays of the sunlight. Keywords: Ultraviolet radiation, Skin damage, Natural sun blocker, DNA damages https://doi.org/10.33887/rjpbcs/2021.12.2.4 *Corresponding author March – April 2021 RJPBCS 12(2) Page No. 19 ISSN: 0975-8585 INTRODUCTION Herbs have been known since ancient times for their ability to treat, improve and decorate skin diseases, so they have been used in cosmetics [1]. Given the fact that ultraviolet (UV) radiation rays play a role in causing sunburn, wrinkles, premature aging, and reducing immunity to infection and cancer, there is constant need for UV protection and prevention of its side effects [2].
    [Show full text]
  • DNA Repair Mechanisms and the Skin | Skininc.Com
    9/12/2014 DNA Repair Mechanisms and the Skin | SkinInc.com DNA Repair Mechanisms and the Skin By: Michael Q. Pugliese and Peter T. Pugliese, MD Posted: July 31, 2014, from the August 2014 issue of Skin Inc. magazine. Silently and efficiently, the cells of the skin work furiously to repair the damage that is incessantly assaulting your deoxyribose nucleic acid (DNA). Without these repair mechanisms, life would be impossible. The major manifestation of DNA damage on the skin is skin cancer. Clients who have red hair and are Fitzpatrick Type I are the most susceptible to this type of damage, but anyone who is exposed to high levels of sun exposure is a candidate for DNA damage. If serious, most DNA damage to the skin will manifest as some type of lesion. If skin care professionals notice actinic keratosis, multiple ugly, pigmented spots or any lesion that cannot be recognized, they should immediately refer the client to a dermatologist. In this article, only the basic mechanisms of DNA repair will be covered for the skin care professional by answering four essential questions. 1. How does the skin become damaged? 2. What type of damage is incurred by DNA and other organelles in the skin? 3. How does the skin repair this damage? 4. What can be used topically to assist in DNA repair? There are so many assaults on the DNA during the life of the average cell that, eventually, if an organism lived long enough, the cells would not be able to keep up the repair effort, and they would either die or become malignant.
    [Show full text]
  • DNA Repair from Wikipedia.Org
    DNA repair From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (Redirected from Dna repair) Jump to: navigation, search For the journal, see DNA Repair (journal). DNA damage resulting in multiple broken chromosomes DNA repair refers to a collection of processes by which a cell identifies and corrects damage to the DNA molecules that encode its genome. In human cells, both normal metabolic activities and environmental factors such as UV light and radiation can cause DNA damage, resulting in as many as 1 million individual molecular lesions per cell per day.[1] Many of these lesions cause structural damage to the DNA molecule and can alter or eliminate the cell's ability to transcribe the gene that the affected DNA encodes. Other lesions induce potentially harmful mutations in the cell's genome, which affect the survival of its daughter cells after it undergoes mitosis. Consequently, the DNA repair process is constantly active as it responds to damage in the DNA structure. When normal repair processes fail, and when cellular apoptosis does not occur, irreparable DNA damage may occur, including double-strand breaks and DNA crosslinkages.[2][3] The rate of DNA repair is dependent on many factors, including the cell type, the age of the cell, and the extracellular environment. A cell that has accumulated a large amount of DNA damage, or one that no longer effectively repairs damage incurred to its DNA, can enter one of three possible states: 1. an irreversible state of dormancy, known as senescence 2. cell suicide, also known as apoptosis or programmed cell death 3. unregulated cell division, which can lead to the formation of a tumor that is cancerous The DNA repair ability of a cell is vital to the integrity of its genome and thus to its normal functioning and that of the organism.
    [Show full text]
  • Associations Between Environmental Factors and Incidence of Cutaneous Melanoma
    Volkovova et al. Environmental Health 2012, 11(Suppl 1):S12 http://www.ehjournal.net/content/11/S1/S12 REVIEW Open Access Associations between environmental factors and incidence of cutaneous melanoma. Review Katarina Volkovova1*†, Dagmar Bilanicova1,2†, Alena Bartonova3†, Silvia Letašiová4, Maria Dusinska1,3† From HENVINET (Health and Environment Network) final conference Brussels, Belgium. 14 April 2010 - 15 April 2010 Abstract Background: Cutaneous melanoma is one of the most serious skin cancers. It is caused by neural crest-derived melanocytes - pigmented cells normally present in the epidermis and, sometimes, in the dermis. Methods: We performed a review of current knowledge on the risk factors of cutaneous melanoma. Relevant studies were identified using the PubMed, Science Direct, Medline, Scopus, Scholar Google and ISI Web of Knowledge databases. Results: Melanoma incurs a considerable public health burden owing to the worldwide dramatic rise in incidence since the mid-1960s. Ultraviolet radiation exposure is the predominant environmental risk factor. The role of geographical (latitude) and individual factors such as skin type, life style, vitamin D levels and antioxidant protection, sunburn, and exposure to other environmental factors possibly contributing to melanoma risk (such as cosmetics including sunscreen, photosensitising drugs, and exogenous hormones) are reviewed in this article. Recently, both rare high risk susceptibility genes and common polymorphic genes contributing to melanoma risk have been identified. Conclusions: Cutaneous melanoma is a complex cancer with heterogeneous aetiology that continues to increase in incidence. Introduction of new biomarkers may help to elucidate the mechanism of pathogenesis and individual susceptibility to the disease, and make both prevention and treatment more effective.
    [Show full text]
  • Non Melanoma Skin Cancer Pathogenesis Overview
    biomedicines Review Non Melanoma Skin Cancer Pathogenesis Overview Dario Didona 1, Giovanni Paolino 2, Ugo Bottoni 3 ID and Carmen Cantisani 2,* ID 1 Klinik für Dermatologie und Allergologie, Universitätsklinikum Marburg, Baldingerstraße, 35043 Marburg, Germany; [email protected] 2 Department of Dermatology, Sapienza Università di Roma, Rome 00100, Italy; [email protected] 3 Department of Dermatology, Università della Magna Grecia, Catanzaro 88100, Italy; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-064-997-6993; Fax: +39-0649-0243 Received: 16 November 2017; Accepted: 20 December 2017; Published: 2 January 2018 Abstract: (1) Background: Non-melanoma skin cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer in humans. The process of skin carcinogenesis is still not fully understood. However, several studies have been conducted to better explain the mechanisms that lead to malignancy; (2) Methods: We reviewed the more recent literature about the pathogenesis of non-melanoma skin cancer focusing on basal cell carcinomas, squamous cell carcinoma and actinic keratosis; (3) Results: Several papers reported genetic and molecular alterations leading to non-melanoma skin cancer. Plenty of risk factors are involved in non-melanoma skin cancer pathogenesis, including genetic and molecular alterations, immunosuppression, and ultraviolet radiation; (4) Conclusion: Although skin carcinogenesis is still not fully understood, several papers demonstrated that genetic and molecular alterations are involved in this process. In addition, plenty of non-melanoma skin cancer risk factors are now known, allowing for an effective prevention of non-melanoma skin cancer development. Compared to other papers on the same topic, our review focused on molecular and genetic factors and analyzed in detail several factors involved in non-melanoma skin cancer.
    [Show full text]
  • REVIEW Ch2ax: a Sensitive Molecular Marker of DNA Damage and Repair
    Leukemia (2010) 24, 679–686 & 2010 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 0887-6924/10 $32.00 www.nature.com/leu REVIEW cH2AX: a sensitive molecular marker of DNA damage and repair L-J Mah1,2, A El-Osta2,3 and TC Karagiannis1,2 1Epigenomic Medicine, BakerIDI Heart and Diabetes Institute, The Alfred Medical Research and Education Precinct, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; 2Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia and 3Epigenetics in Human Health and Disease, BakerIDI Heart and Diabetes Institute, The Alfred Medical Research and Education Precinct, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Phosphorylation of the Ser-139 residue of the histone variant In recent years, immunofluorescence based assays that allow H2AX, forming cH2AX, is an early cellular response to the the visualization of discrete nuclear foci formed as a result of induction of DNA double-strand breaks. Detection of this phosphorylation event has emerged as a highly specific and H2AX phosphorylation have emerged as very sensitive and sensitive molecular marker for monitoring DNA damage initia- reliable methods of detecting DSBs. Quantification of individual tion and resolution. Further, analysis of cH2AX foci has gH2AX foci by fluorescence microscopy has become numerous other applications including, but not limited to, the preferred method of DSB detection given that each break cancer and aging research. Quantitation of cH2AX foci has also has been found to correspond to one gH2AX focus.7,8 been applied as a useful tool for the evaluation of the efficacy of DSB detection based on gH2AX foci is 100-fold or more various developmental drugs, particularly, radiation modifying compounds.
    [Show full text]
  • Atorvastatin Prolongs the Lifespan of Radiation‑Induced Reactive Oxygen Species in PC‑3 Prostate Cancer Cells to Enhance
    ONCOLOGY REPORTS 37: 2049-2056, 2017 Atorvastatin prolongs the lifespan of radiation‑induced reactive oxygen species in PC‑3 prostate cancer cells to enhance the cell killing effect HAO Yu, SHAO-QiAN SuN, XiAO-BiN Gu, WeN WANG and XiAN-SHu GAO Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing 100034, P.R. China Received June 25, 2016; Accepted August 23, 2016 DOI: 10.3892/or.2017.5447 Abstract. Studies have reported that atorvastatin (ATO) may of radiation-induced ROS via a decrease in the level of NOXs increase the radiosensitivity of malignant cells. However, the and SOD activity. influence of ATO on reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels before and after irradiation has not been fully illustrated. In Introduction the present study, radiosensitivity was evaluated by a clono- genic assay and a cell survival curve and cell apoptosis was Radiotherapy is one of the main treatments used to deal measured by flow cytometry. ROS were detected by a laser with malignancy. More than 50% of patients with malig- scanning confocal microscope and flow cytometry with a nant tumors receive radiotherapy during their treatment (1). DCFH-DA probe. NADPH oxidases (NOXs) and superoxide Radiation-induced DNA damage is one of main mechanisms dismutase (SOD) proteins were detected by immunoblotting, underlying the cell killing effect of radiotherapy. Compared and total SOD activity was measured using an SOD kit. with the direct killing effect of irradiation, the indirect killing We also conducted transient transfection of NOX2 and effect that results from reactive oxygen species (ROS) plays NOX4 genes to increase intracellular ROS generation and a pivotal role in DNA damage (2).
    [Show full text]
  • Production of Oxidative DNA Damage During the Metabolic
    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 85, pp. 4365-4368, June 1988 Cell Biology Production of oxidative DNA damage during the metabolic activation of benzo[a]pyrene in human mammary epithelial cells correlates with cell killing (oxygen radicals/radical scavengers/immunoassay/DNA damage/DNA repair) STEVEN A. LEADON*, MARTHA R. STAMPFER, AND JACK BARTLEY Division of Cell and Molecular Biology, Building 934, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720 Communicated by Melvin Calvin, March 18, 1988 (received for review October 6, 1987) ABSTRACT We have studied the generation of reactive gens, it is important to identify the primary DNA lesions oxygen species during the metabolism of a carcinogen, ben- produced directly by adduct formation and indirectly by free zo[a]pyrene, by human mammary epithelial cells. We have radicals. quantitated the production of one type of oxidative DNA One product that is formed in DNA as a consequence of damage, thymine glycols, by using a monoclonal antibody chemical oxidation or ionizing radiation is thymine glycol (13, specific to this base modification. Thymine glycols were pro- 14). A sensitive immunoassay for thymine glycols has been duced in DNA in a dose-dependent manner after exposure of developed with a monoclonal antibody to this product in human mammary epithelial cells to benzo[alpyrene. The num- DNA (15). By using this methodology, thymine glycols have ber of thymine glycols formed in the DNA was similar to that been detected in DNA after treatment of cultured human of 7,8-dihydroxy-9,10-epoxy-7,8,9,10-tetrahydrobenzo[ajpy- fibroblasts with ionizing radiation, 254-nm ultraviolet light, rene covalently bound to the DNA.
    [Show full text]
  • UV-Induced Damage to Microorganism INTRODUCTION
    Lecture-4 M.Sc 2nd Semester (Environmental Microbiology) Paper EM-202: Microbial physiology and adaptation Unit IV: UV-induced damage to Microorganism INTRODUCTION Ultraviolet radiation induces deleterious effects in all living organisms ranging from prokaryotic bacteria to eukaryotic lower and higher plants, animals and humans. While UV-C (<280 nm) radiation is ecologically not relevant since it is quantitatively absorbed by oxygen and ozone in the Earth’s atmosphere, the longer wavelength UV-B (280–315 nm) and UV-A (315–400 nm) radiation can have significant effects on the biota, even though the majority of the extraterrestrial UV-B is absorbed by stratospheric ozone. The adverse effects of solar radiation on living systems are mostly attributed to the small amount of UV-B that is absorbed by cellular DNA. UVA wavelengths are less efficient in inducing DNA damage because they are not absorbed by native DNA but they can still produce secondary photoreactions of existing DNA photoproducts or damage DNA via indirect photosensitizing reactions. Some of the biological effects of solar UV radiation include reduction in growth and survival, protein destruction, pigment bleaching and photoinhibition of photosynthesis in several organisms. Photodynamic reactions are potential mechanisms by which ultraviolet radiation damages living cells. The high energy short-wavelength photons absorbed by chromophoric molecules can lead to the formation of singlet oxygen or free radicals known to destroy membranes and other cellular components. DNA is obviously one of the key targets for UV-induced damage in a variety of organisms such as bacteria, cyanobacteria, phytoplankton, macroalgae, plants, animals and humans. All biological cells are rich in UV-absorbing agents such as nucleic acids and proteins.
    [Show full text]