U·M·I University Microfilms International a Bell & Howelilnformation Company 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, M148106-1346 USA 313/761-4700 800/521-0600
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Life on hold: A theory of spouse response to the waiting period prior to heart transplantation. Item Type text; Dissertation-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Williams, Mary. Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 04/10/2021 03:39:52 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/185731 INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduce~ from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, ~ubstandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand corner and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. U·M·I University Microfilms International A Bell & Howelilnformation Company 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, M148106-1346 USA 313/761-4700 800/521-0600 Order Number 9210116 Life on Hold: A theory of spouse response to the waiting period prior to heart transplantation Williams, Mary, Ph.D. The University of Arizona, 1991 Copyright @)1991 by Wllllams, Mary. All rights reserved. U·M·I 300 N. Zeeb Rd. Ann Arbor, MI 48106 LIFE ON HOLD: A TIlEORY OF SPOUSE RESPONSE TO TIlE WAITING PERIOD PRIOR TO HEART TRANSPLANTATION by Mary Williams Copyright @ Mary Williams 1991 A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the COLLEGE OF NURSING In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOcrOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 199 1 2 THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA GRADUATE COLLEGE As members of the Final Examination Committee, we certify that we have read the dissertation prepared bY __~M~a~r~y~W~i~l~l~i~a~m~s~ __________________ ent it led _~L""I~F~E,--"O,-"N,---"H,""O"..,L,-"D,-,:,-"",A,---"T,""H,-,=E"""O"",R,-"Y--",O"""F---",S~P-"O",,,U,",,,S""'E'--"'R""'E""S"'-P.".O""'N... S""'E'"--"T...:::O __ __ THE WAITING PERIOD PRIOR TO HEART TRANSPLANTATION and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Pbi J osophy Date r;ran Date \ ~. hi~_;~ Date Final approval and acceptance of this dissertation is contingent upon the candidate's submission of the final copy of the dissertation to the Graduate College. I hereby certify that I have read this dissertation prepared under my direction and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement. Dat' ; 3 STATEMENT BY THE AUTHOR This dissertation has been submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements for an advanced degree at the University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this dissertation are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknowledgement of source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the copyright holder. SIGNED: m~ ,,4.1luQw <3 4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This dissertation would not have reached completion without the assistance and encouragement of many people. To them I am most grateful. I especially thank the spouses of the heart transplant candidates who so willingly shared their experiences. I am grateful to the transplant coordinators and social workers at L.D.S. Hospital and the University of Utah Medical Center for their participation and support. I thank Dr. Carolyn Murdaugh, my advisor and chairperson, for her continuous support, encouragement, and inspiration. She has been my mentor and role model throughout my graduate education and has tenderly guided me in every aspect of development as a researcher. She has taught me what it means to be humanistic, and yet excellent in all aspects of life. To her I will be forever grateful. I extend gratitude to the members of my dissertation committee: Dr. Linda Phillips, Dr. Joyce Verran, Dr. Travis Hirschi, and Dr. David Snow for their support and assistance in organizing and refining my ideas. I express thanks to Dr. Sharon Sims for so efficiently completing my audit. I am grateful to Dean June Leifson, Dr. Sandra Rogers and the other faculty members at Brigham Young University College of Nursing who often carried my load so I could complete my dissertation. Denise Gibbons, Cathy Leatham, and Patricia Sanborn have been most helpful in preparing the final document. I thank my friends, the Lee Ann's, the Evelyn's, the Donna's and the Rene's who have been friends for all seasons. I express appreciation to my family. My sister Jane, who died of pancreatic and liver cancer during the process; and her four children, Rebecca, Julie, Kathryn and Richard taught me there are things worth putting "Life on Hold" for. Because of them, my climb has been slower, more complex and often thwarted with obstacles; and yet the lessons learned along the way have been most valuable. i>erhaps because of them, I appreciate reaching the summit more. Lastly and mostly, to my parents, who have taught me the love of learning and being true to myself. For their never ending love and support I am most appreciative. 5 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF ILLUSTRATION .............................. 9 LIST OF TABLES .................................. 10 ABSTRACT ...................................... 11 CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION .............................. 12 The Research Problem ............................ 12 Significance of the Study for Nursing . 24 Purpose of the Study and Research Questions .. 27 Summary .................................... 27 2. THEORETICAL CONTEXT . 28 Heart Transplant Recipients . 28 Selection of Recipients for Heart Transplantation . 30 Waiting Period . 32 Summary .................................... 33 3. METHODOLOGY .............................. 14 Introduction to the Grounded Theory Methodology . 34 Background of the Grounded Theory Methodology ............................. 34 Nature of the Grounded Theory Methodology ........... 35 6 TABLE OF CONTENTS -- Continued Page 3. METHODOLOGY (Cont.) Appropriateness of the Grounded Theory Methodology for the Research Questions ......................... 36 Specification of Procedures ........................ 39 Sampling Procedures . 39 Data Collection Procedures and Respondent Characteristics ..................... 41 Data Analysis Plan . 48 Coding ................................. 48 Memoing ................................ 50 Theoretical Sorting . 52 Issues Related to the Grounded Theory Methodology ......... 53 Maintenance of Theoretical Sensitivity .......... 53 Limiting Predetermined Ideas and Dealing With Biases . 54 Using the Investigator's Skills in the Research Process ............................. 56 Ongoing Literature Review ................... 57 Theoretical Pacing ........................ 57 Establishing Trustworthiness . 58 Credibility ............................. 59 Transferability . 60 Dependability ........................... 61 Confirmability . 63 Summary .................................... 64 7 TABLE OF CONTENTS -- Continued Page 4. THE GROUNDED THEORY ........... ........... 65 Life on Hold . 65 Freeing Self . 67 Tying Loose Ends . • . • . • . • . 70 Diminishing Activities ...................... 71 Delegating Responsibilities ................... 72 Making Life the Transplant . 73 Maintaining Life . 74 Focusing ........................... 74 Attaching . 77 Valuing ............................ 79 Sustaining ........................... 81 Assuming . 85 Preserving Self . 86 Promoting Health . 86 Doing Only the Important . 87 Intervening Conditions . 88 Relocating . 89 Social Support and Social Networks ................. 90 Age ..................................... 90 Child Care Responsibilities ....................... 91 Physical Stability of the Candidate .................. 91 Length of Illnesc; ......... 92 Summary .................................... 93 8 TABLE OF CONTENTS -- Continued Page 5. CONCLUSIONS ............................... 93 Substantiation of Earlier Research ..........•.......... 93 Conclusions of the Study . • . 96 Coping Adaptation . • . 96 Uncertainty .....................•.......... 97 Stress ................................•... 99 Implications for Nursing Theory . .. 102 Implications for Nursing Research . .. 103 Implications for Nursing Practice . .. 105 Study Limitations .............................. 106