DOCSLIB.ORG

OFFLOW HUNDRED. Land, Called Great Busall, Left by an Unknown Donor, and Are Further Relie\'Ed by the Following Yearly Sums, Viz.: Los

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
OFFLOW HUNDRED. Land, Called Great Busall, Left by an Unknown Donor, and Are Further Relie\'Ed by the Following Yearly Sums, Viz.: Los S02 OFFLOW HUNDRED. land, called Great Busall, left by an unknown donor, and are further relie\'ed by the following yearly sums, viz.: lOs. left by William, Bmdbury, in 1641, out of land called Grea\·en, lying in Banbutts; lOs. out of Furlong close, left by John Kirkland, in 1';37; 6s. out of land in Mickleholme, left by Wm. Wright; 5s. left by John Yeld, out of Burway meadow; 5s. left by Thomas Shemmonds, out of the Leens close; and £4. lOs. as the interest of £90, left by Franeis Cobh, inl804. Amongst the LOST CHARITIES of this parish is tbe interest of £55, left in J692, by William Turton, Esq., and from the year J777 to 1814, paid out of Highlins Park, a part of the demesne of the Duchy of Lancaster, lately held by Lady Evelyn, a descendant of the testp.tor. FRADLEV, l mile S. of Alrewas, is a small village, com­ prising within its township about 1300 acres of land, and 382 inhabitants. Fradley Heath formed part ofthe extensive waste of Alrewas-Hay, but was enclosed about the year 1805. Plott says, on one part of this common is a remarkable spring, vul­ garly said to he bottomless, which always O\'erflows, and though in a low situation, actually r.ermits the plummet to descend 42 feet. On the canal, half a mile S. of Fradley~ is Dunstall wharf and hamlet. 0RRilEA v E is a small village and township, on the south bank of the Trent, half a mile W. of Alrewas. It has 123 in­ habitants, and about 700 acres of laod. The Hall, now a farm­ house with a fine avenue of elms, was formerly the seat of the Adams family, the paternal ancestors of the Earl of Licbfield. ALRE'V AS-HAY, 4 miles N. by E. of Lichfield, is an er.c­ t1·a parochial liberty, belonging to the Earl of Licbfield, and containing the 8mall village of FRADLEY JUNCTION, so called from the Fazeley, and Trent andMersey canals, which here unite. This district, which has now 77 inhabitants, was fom1erly an open forest or chase, and at the time of the conquest, perhaps formed the extensive wood noticed in Domesday book. It was . not wholly enclosed tilll826. · ALREWAS. Green Thomas, saddler :Baggaley John, gent. Alrewas Hackett & Essex, needle mnfrs. Cottage . Haythorn T. W. lace thread mnfr. Battelle Thos, Esq. (/!r Elford) (and Nottingham) Bean Hanh. straw hat maker Heath Daniel, gentleman Brooks Jeremiah, manager Hickson Mrs. Penelope Cross Mr. William Kent Isaac, joiuer Dagley Mr. Daniel Kent John, wire drawer, & bon- Farmer Mrs. Sarah net wire, & hair pin manfr. Genders Thomas, gentleman Knight Rd. gent. Dunstall bdg. Gillott Samuel, nail maker Lakin John, gentleman Gould Ralph, cart owner MarshallThomas, grocer, draper, Graham J ames, cooper cotton ball mnfr. and agent to Green J ames, butcher the Manchester Fire Office Green John, wool sorter MayJames, junior, bricklayer Grern Joseph, butcher Moore Rev. John, M. A. vicar • .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Brook Walks Downloadable From: Walk
    WALKS IN LONGDON LOCATION Longdon is midway between Lichfield and Rugeley on the A51 road with Longdon Green on one side (signposted) and Longdon (Brook End) on the other. HISTORY LONGDON The name Longdon is derived from the Saxon “Langandune”, PARISH meaning long hill, located in the old Offlow Hundred. The Bishops of Lichfield held the manor of Longdon up to 1546 when it was surrendered to Henry VIII. In the same year the king granted ownership to Sir William (later Lord) Paget, an ancestor of the Marquis of Anglesey. He was one of the principal Secretaries of State. In 1563 Longdon was recorded with 102 households which grew to 178 by 1665. Today the population is around 2000, occupying approximately 1850 hectares. 4. HILL TOP Exit left onto wide stone track past farm buildings. There are views of Armitage, Handsacre and Rugeley Power Station as well as the distant Peak District hills. At the end of the track turn left onto ‘Green Lane’ bounded by trees and hedges. This can be muddy after rain. REMEMBER THE COUNTRYSIDE CODE Pass through a gateway by an old tree continuing along ■ Be safe - plan ahead and follow signs the lane. The path loses height as Longdon village returns into ■ Consider other people view. Go through the gate and into the field. Proceed directly ■ Leave gates and property as before ahead towards the marker post just before the brook. (The trees ■ Protect plants and animals, and take your litter home ahead line the Shropshire Brook). ■ Keep dogs under close control 5. SHROPSHIRE BROOK Leaflet 10 pence - when purchased Turn left keeping the brook on the right hand side and continue to the kissing gate in the far corner of the field.
    [Show full text]
  • White's 1857 Directory of Derbyshire
    328 REPTON AND GRESLEY HUNDRED. This Hundred forms the south extremity of the county, and is bounded on the north and west by the river Trent, on the south and east by Leicestershire, having at the south-east extremity a considerable portion detached and completely surrounded by Leicestershire, where No Man’s Heath, in the chapelry of Chilcote, connects the four counties of Leicester, Derby, Stafford and Warwick. It consists 65,677 statue acres, generally a rich red loamy soil, considered the finest agricultural district in the county. The following table is an enumeration of its 27 parishes, showing their territorial extent, the annual value, and their population from 1801 to 1851, as returned at the five decennial periods of the parliamentary census. * The letters after the names signify P for Parish, C for Chapelry, and T for Township. Rate- POPULATION. 1851. Parishes. Acres able Value 1801 1811 1821 1831 1841 Hses Males. Fmles. Total. Appleby, p. 2748 £2075 935 1123 1185 1150 1075 270 576 605 1181 Bretby, p. 1760 2400 265 341 302 325 298 66 188 181 369 * Burton-on-Trent, — — — — — — — — — — — Winshall, t. 1150 2313 309 317 357 342 377 88 196 209 405 Calke, p. 720 1200 96 67 63 58 55 11 32 47 79 Chellaston, p. 816 1250 205 261 338 352 461 113 257 242 499 Chilcote, c. 1320 1920 168 194 192 191 162 33 85 75 160 Church Gresley, p. 1075 2890 245 235 306 671 993 258 655 602 1257 Castle Gresley, t 570 1034 114 119 129 126 164 36 102 88 190 Donisthorpe & 344 92 189 203 392 Oakthorpe, t.
    [Show full text]
  • A Landscape Survey of the Parish of Shenstone
    A Landscape Survey of the Parish of Shenstone Edited by Richard Totty for The Staffordshire Archaeological and Historical Society Lichfield 2009 A Landscape Survey of the Parish of Shenstone Edited by Richard Totty for The Staffordshire Archaological and Historical Society President John Hunt, B.A. , Ph.D., FSA, F.R.Hist.Soc, P.G.C.E. Contributions by members of the Society including Brian Bull, Dr Dianne Barre , Betty Fox , Dr John Hunt, Alan Moore , Bronwen Ross , Dr Richard Totty , Diana Wilkes , Roland Watson and others. Lichfield 2009 www.sahs.uk.net 1 St John's Church Shenstone in a 1784 water colour ( from a print in the William Salt Library ) This publication, and the project upon which it is based, would not have been possible without the support of the Heritage Lottery Fund who first grant-aided the Society's project in 2005 through the Local Heritage Initiative scheme. Staffordshire Archaeological and Historical Society gratefully acknowledge the support of the HLF for this project from its inception through to the production of this Report. We would also like to acknowledge the interest and enthusiasm of the many Shenstone residents who have supported and shared in the research of the project, opening their homes to members of the buildings group, sharing their own knowledge of the village and parish, and participating in the various community-based events that the Society has promoted during the course of the project. Particular thanks are owed to Shenstone Library, and to the committee of the Wesley Hall. 2 THEMES 1. Introduction 2. Topography 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Medieval Homerwych
    Medieval Homerwych Introduction The modern settlement of Hammerwich is situated approximately 5km west of the Cathedral city of Lichfield and 2.5km from the Roman fort of Wall (Letocetvm, ‘The Grey Woods’). The Roman fort at Wall sat at the crossroads of two major cross country routes: Watling Street (A5) and Icknield Way. These ancient pathways provided Hammerwich with important trade and distribution routes. Hammerwich lay within that portion of Cannock forest which became Cannock Chase in the 13 th century (B.H.O., doc.2, 1). The King William inquest evidence for Hammerwich Figure 1. Part of Domesday Book for Staffordshire which records two Hammerwiches (T.N.A., E31/2/2/1922). The following translation has been provided by The National Archives (T.N.A.) “IN OFFLOW HUNDRED The bishop himself holds LICHFIELD with its appendages. The church itself held it. There are 25 ½ hides and 1 virgate of land. There is land for 73 ploughs. In demesne are 10 ploughs, and 10 slaves; and 42 villans and 12 bordars having 21 ploughs; and 5 canons have 3 ploughs there. There are 35 acres of meadow, and 2 mills rendering 4s. It was and is worth 15l. 1 To this manor belong these members; Packington, land for 4 ploughs; and the two Hammerwiches [Hammerwich], 5 carucates of land; and Stychbrook, land for 1 plough; and Norton Canes and Little Wyrley, 4 carucates of land; and Rowley, 1 carucate of land. All these lands are waste.” Although the two Hammerwiches have 5 carucates of land between them, they were not being cultivated and were classified as waste land.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Heritage 13
    CULTURAL HERITAGE 13 13.0 CULTURAL HERITAGE The consideration of the application of the Hedgerows Regulations 1997 is intended to be indicative rather than definitive. Searches relating to the information necessary for the regulations are restricted to those that are 13.1 Introduction readily available. For instance, Worcestershire Archaeology will not usually This Chapter of the ES has been prepared by Worcestershire Archaeology have undertaken exhaustive searches of documents (particularly textual and comprises a Cultural Heritage Assessment of the proposed extension documents) held by a Records Office. Wildlife and landscape criteria are to Hints Quarry. The application site is considered to have the potential to also beyond the scope of this assessment and have not been considered. include heritage assets, the significance of which may be affected by the development. 13.2.3 List of sources consulted Cartographic sources 13.2 Methodology • William Yates, 1775 Map of Staffordshire 13.2.1 Personnel • Ordnance Survey. 1834 1" to 1 mile, Map of Staffordshire sheet The assessment was undertaken by Tom Rogers (M.Sc); who joined 62NE Worcestershire Archaeology in 2005 and has been practicing archaeology • 1847 Tithe Map of Hints since 1993. Robin Jackson (BA, AiFA) edited the report. Illustrations were prepared by Carolyn Hunt. • 1847 Tithe Map of Packington • Ordnance Survey. 1888 Edition 6" to 1 mile Sheet 59 SW 13.2.2 Documentary research • Ordnance Survey, 1890 1st Edition 6" to 1mile Sheet 58 SE All relevant information on the history of the site and past land-use was collected and assessed. Records of known archaeological sites and • Ordnance Survey, 1902 2nd Edition 25" to 1 mile Sheet LIX.9 monuments were obtained from Staffordshire Historic Environment Record • Ordnance Survey.
    [Show full text]
  • Collections for a History of Staffordshire, 1919
    COLLECTIONS FOR A StaffordshireHISTORY OF STAFFORDSHIRE EDITED BY SampleCounty 19 19. Studies “ And in this undertaking, the Reader may see what Furniture (though it lie disperst) our Publick Records will afford for H istory: and how plentifully our own may be supplied and improved, if pains were taken therein : for what is hitherto made publick, hath been collected, chiefly out of old Annals, and they tilled with few things but such as were very obvious, nay the Annalists themselves (for the most part residing in Monasteries) too oftened byass’d with Interest, and Affection, to Times and Persons: But on the contrary, in our publick Records lye matter of Fact, in full Truth, and therewith the Chronological part, carried on, even to days of the Month. So that an industrious Searcher may thence collect considerable matter for new History, rectifle many mistakes in our old and in both gratifle the world with unshadowed verity.’’— ( A s h m o l e s History o f the Garter.) LONDON: HARRISON AND SONS, LTD., ST. M ARTIN’S LANE, 1920. 1 9 1 0 . StaffordshirePRESIDENT. T h e R i g h t How. t h e EARL OP DARTMOUTH, P.O., K.C.B, Y.D. COUNCIL. Nominated by tie, Trustees of the William Salt Library. T h e R t . H o n . t h e LORJD IIA TH ER TO N , C.M.G. S i r REGINALD HARDY, B a b t . T h e R e t . P. J. WROTTESLEY. M e . WALTER If. LANDOR. Elected by the Members of the Society.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeological Desk-Based Assessment Land Off Craythorne Road, Stretton
    P/2014/00818 Received 25/06/2014 ARCHAEOLOGICAL DESK-BASED ASSESSMENT LAND OFF CRAYTHORNE ROAD STRETTON STAFFORDSHIRE January 2013 (Revised December 2013) Planning Authority: East Staffordshire Borough Council Site centred at: SK 247 265 Author: Dr Robert Smith CEnv CGeog CSci C.WEM FRGS MCIWEM MIfA Approved by: Paul Chadwick BA FSA MIfA Report Status: Final Issue Date: January 2013 Revised (December 2013) CgMs Ref: PC/RS/14732 © CgMs Limited No part of this report is to be copied in any way without prior written consent. Every effort is made to provide detailed and accurate information, however, CgMs Limited cannot be held responsible for errors or inaccuracies within this report. © Ordnance Survey maps reproduced with the sanction of the controller of HM Stationery Office. Licence No: AL 100014723 Archaeological Desk-Based Assessment Land off Craythorne Road, Stretton CONTENTS Executive Summary 1.0 Introduction and Scope of Study 2.0 Planning Background and Development Plan Framework 3.0 Geology and Topography 4.0 Archaeological/Historical Background and Assessment of Significance 5.0 Site Conditions, the Proposed Development and Impact on Heritage Assets 6.0 Summary and Conclusions Sources Consulted LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Figure 1 Site Location Figure 2 Site Details Figure 3 HER Data Plot Figure 4 1659 Montgomery and Talbot’s Map Figure 5 1832 Bowen’s Map Figure 6 1884 Ordnance Survey Map Figure 7 1901 Ordnance Survey Map Figure 8 1924 Ordnance Survey Map Figure 9 1938 Ordnance Survey Map Figure 10 1955 Ordnance Survey Map Figure 11
    [Show full text]
  • Newborough. (Offlow Hundred.)
    564 NEWBOROUGH. (OFFLOW HUNDRED.) l Mansfield Wm 11 3 Robinson John SHOEMAKERS. 3 Lloyd J ames, 4 Rawlins Dnl. & Son, (and millers) 4 ClarkJohn (agent to Dist. a Robotham Mrs Ann 11 3 Sherwin J as 3 Griffifu Wm Fire Office) 3 Swindall John (and owner) 3 Hallam George WHEELWRIGHTS,' 4 Tetley Joseph 11 1 Turner Wm SHOPKEEPERS. 3 Gould Wm 5 Walker Thos 11 3 Woodings Fredk 3 Bradley Wm 3 Townsend Hy INNS & TAVERNS. 3 Griffith Wm · 3 Ward Ellen '3 Red Lion, W m Loverock ( & butcher) 3 Lloyd J ames 2 Whyman Thos 2 Shoulder of Mutton.t Wm Collier 3 Robinson John · CABltlEL l 3White Hart, Ohs Hancock (saddler) 3 Woodings Isaac 3 John Eason, to BEERHOUSES, BLACKSMITHS. 1 Woodings Jas Burton,Thurs;. 3 Bradley Wm 2 Shipley Joseph TAILORS, • Uttoxtr, Wed; 3 Woodingslsaac 3 Wilson Wm 2 Lindsey Saml and Lichfield, ,r 3 Woolley George Friday • HASELOUR, 7f miles east of Li~bfield, is an extra-parochial manor of .:570 acres, containing only five houses, 29 inhabitants, and a deserted c},apel,. which is a prebend of Lichfield Cathedral. This manor passed from the Staffords to the Stanleys, and by marriage to John Brook, Esq. It sub­ sequently became the property of Joseph Girdler, sergeant-at-law, from whom it passed to two coheiresses ; so that it is now in two moities, be-· longing to Lady Chetwynd, and John Neville, Esq., the latter of whom is l.ord of the whole manor, and resides in the Hall, which is a fine specimen of the old half-timbered houses, having several florid gables and transom windows.
    [Show full text]
  • Working Paper Richard Sylvanus Williams 1851
    _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ A SURVEY OF STAFFORDSHIRE MEDICAL PRACTITIONERS IN 1851 by Richard Sylvanus Williams DRAFT (14 Jun 2018) _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ Copyright 2018. Richard Sylvanus Williams Richard Sylvanus Williams 30 King Street WINTERTON North Lincolnshire DN15 9TP 01724 737254 [email protected] June 2018 A SURVEY OF STAFFORDSHIRE MEDICAL PRACTITIONERS IN 1851 On census night 30 Mar 1851 there was a cohort of 274 medical practitioners1, hereafter called medics, resident (or normally resident2) in the county as it then extended. The population of the county was then 608,716 so that there was one medic to every 2,222 residents. An alphabetical register has been compiled3 in which an account4 is given of the life and career of each medic with appropriate references. Each entry includes material on his birth, parentage, education and career, marriage and immediate family, and death. This survey is based on those entries. A very few of the cohort, or their immediate family, became famous or infamous in national life and are thus mentioned in the Online Dictionary of National Biography. They are: Joseph Barnard Davis, F.S.A. 1801-1891 a celebrated
    [Show full text]
  • P H O E N I X C O N S U L T I N G Alrewas Quarry Southern Extension
    P H O E N I X C O N S U L T I N G A r c h a e o l o g y L i m i t e d CULTURAL HERITAGE CONTRIBUTION TO AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Alrewas Quarry Southern Extension Whitemoor Haye Staffordshire on behalf of: A Richmond BA PhD MIfA FSA March 2014 Alrewas South, Staffordshire Contents Non technical summary 1 INTRODUCTION 2 ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY Objectives Key tasks Desk Based Assessment Geophysical Survey Trial Trench Evaluation Consultation Mitigation measures Types of impact Defining setting Views 3 SIGNIFICANCE CRITERIA 4 PLANNING AND LEGISLATIVE CONTEXT Legislation National planning guidance Local planning guidance Minerals and Waste Development Framework 5 BASELINE CONDITIONS Location and current landuse Geology and soils Archaeological and historic landscape 2 | P a g e Alrewas South, Staffordshire Information from the Historic Environment Record (HER) Information from the field investigations The surrounds of the application site Listed Buildings and other cultural heritage assets 6 PREDICTION/ASSESSMENT OF IMPACTS Assessment of direct impacts of construction/establishment Assessment of indirect impacts of construction/establishment Assessment of operation/decommission impacts Suggested mitigation Cumulative impacts Residual impacts 7 SUMMARY Tables 4-8 Annex 1a Desk Based Assessment Annex 1b Geophysical Assessment Annex 1c Trial Trench Assessment Annex 1d NMA car park investigations 3 | P a g e Alrewas South, Staffordshire Non-technical summary A wide range of sources were consulted for this impact assessment, including the local Historic Environment Record, published articles and books and manuscript documents. In addition the site has been comprehensively evaluated by geophysical survey and trial trenching.
    [Show full text]
  • Staffordshire (Pdf)
    STAFFORDSHIRE The county of Staffordshire lies in the western part of the Midlands of England. It is bordered to the west by Shropshire and Cheshire, to the north-east by Derbyshire, to the south-east by Warwickshire, and to the south by Worcestershire. In the 18th and 19th centuries two large centres of industry developed. In the north of the county, the area around Hanley and Stoke- on-Trent became the centre of the ceramic industry, known as ‘The Potteries’, and in the south- west the iron industry flourished in the area that became known as ‘The Black Country’. The county authorities were active in the inspection of weights in the early 19th century, and they were among the first to obtain Imperial Standards in 1825. Three inspectors were appointed in 1834. From 1847 some police officers were used as inspectors, but the county reverted to civilian inspectors in 1858. There were several localities that had separate jurisdiction over weights and measures. Since medieval times Lichfield had been a county-in-itself, but by the 19th century it had declined in importance although there is some evidence of activity in the inspection of weights and measures. There were four ancient boroughs: Stafford, Newcastle-under-Lyme, Tamworth, and Walsall. These were joined as Municipal Boroughs by Wolverhampton (1848), Hanley (1857), Longton (1865), Stoke-on-Trent (1873), Burslem (1878), Burton-upon-Trent (1878), West Bromwich (1882), and Smethwick (1899). In 1889 Walsall, West Bromwich and Wolverhampton became County Boroughs, followed by Smethwick (1907) and Stoke-on-Trent (1910, united with Hanley, Burslem and Longton).
    [Show full text]
  • PROPOSED EXTENSION to ALREWAS QUARRY 2014 Volume I Environmental Statement
    PROPOSED EXTENSION TO ALREWAS QUARRY 2014 Volume I Environmental Statement AGGREGATES AND ASPHALT LAFARGE TARMAC PLANNING APPLICATION FOR A SOUTHERN EXTENSION TO ALREWAS QUARRY WITH RESTORATION TO AGRICULTURE, AMENITY AND NATURE CONSERVATION BY IMPORTATION OF RESTORATION MATERIALS AT ALREWAS QUARRY STAFFORDSHIRE ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT PREPARED BY: DAVID L WALKER LIMITED MARCH 2014 Lafarge Tarmac Alrewas Quarry Environmental Statement Proposed Southern Extension CONTENTS Preface Section 1 Introduction 1.1 Aims of the Environmental Statement 1.2 Screening and Scoping 1.3 Assessment Requirements 1.4 The Applicant Company and Project Team 1.5 Key Facts Section 2 Site Location and Context 2.1 General 2.2 Geology 2.3 Landscape 2.4 Ecology 2.5 Hydrology and Hydrogeology 2.6 Soils and Agriculture 2.7 Traffic 2.8 Noise and Amenity 2.9 Archaeology and Cultural Heritage 2.10 Rights of Way and Utilities Section 3 Working Scheme 3.1 General 3.2 Proposed Working Phases 3.3 Soils Handling, Management and Replacement 3.4 Importation of Restoration Materials 3.5 Dust Suppression 3.6 Other Issues 3.7 Employment Section 4 Design Statement and Restoration Concept 4.1 Objectives and Restoration Concept 4.2 Restoration Features 4.3 Aftercare Section 5 Environmental Considerations 5.1 Introduction 5.2 Landscape and Visual Impact 5.3 Soils and Agricultural Land Quality 5.4 Ecology 5.5 Archaeology and Cultural Heritage 5.6 Hydrology and Hydrogeology 5.7 Noise 5.8 Traffic 5.9 Air Quality 5.10 Alternatives 5.11 Cumulative Impact and Interaction Effects Section
    [Show full text]