(Scheme I Volume 2) (Transmission Lines Associated with GSS at Panki) Public Disclosure Authorized

Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Environment and Social Impact Assessment Report (Scheme I Volume 2) (Transmission Lines Associated with GSS at Panki) Public Disclosure Authorized Jharkhand Urja Sancharan Nigam Limited Final Report November 2018 www.erm.com The Business of Sustainability FINAL REPORT Jharkhand Urja Sancharan Nigam Limited Environment and Social Impact Assessment Report (Scheme I Volume 2) (Transmission Lines Associated with GSS at Panki) 09 November 2018 Reference # 0402882 Prepared by Suvankar Das Consultant Prepared by Abhishek Roy Goswami Senior Consultant Reviewed & Debanjan Approved by: Bandyapodhyay Partner This report has been prepared by ERM India Private Limited a member of Environmental Resources Management Group of companies, with all reasonable skill, care and diligence within the terms of the Contract with the client, incorporating our General Terms and Conditions of Business and taking account of the resources devoted to it by agreement with the client. We disclaim any responsibility to the client and others in respect of any matters outside the scope of the above. This report is confidential to the client and we accept no responsibility of whatsoever nature to third parties to whom this report, or any part thereof, is made known. Any such party relies on the report at their own risk. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 BACKGROUND 1 1.2 PROJECT OVERVIEW 1 1.3 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF THIS ESIA 2 1.4 STRUCTURE OF THE REPORT 2 1.5 LIMITATION 3 1.6 USES OF THIS REPORT 3 2 POLICY, LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE FRAME WORK 5 2.1 APPLICABLE LAWS AND STANDARDS 5 2.2 WORLD BANK SAFEGUARD POLICY 9 3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 11 3.1 PROJECT LOCATION 11 3.2 ACCESSIBILITY 12 3.3 TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT PHASES AND ACTIVITIES 14 3.3.1 Project Planning 14 3.3.2 Project Construction Activities 14 3.4 RESOURCE REQUIREMENT 18 3.4.1 Land Requirement 18 3.4.2 Manpower 18 3.4.3 Water Uses 19 3.4.4 Vehicle usage 19 3.4.5 Major Material Required During Construction 19 3.5 WASTES 20 3.5.1 Wastewater 20 3.5.2 Solid Waste 20 3.6 PROJECT TIMELINE AND PROJECT COST 20 4 METHODOLOGY OF ESIA 21 4.1 SCREENING & SCOPING 21 4.2 BASELINE STUDIES 22 4.3 IMPACT ASSESSMENT 23 4.4 ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN PREPARATION 24 5 ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVE 25 6 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT 31 6.1 INTRODUCTION 31 6.2 TERRAIN 31 6.3 LAND USE & LAND COVER 31 6.4 SOIL 32 6.5 CLIMATE AND METEOROLOGY 32 6.6 AIR ENVIRONMENT 33 6.7 NOISE ENVIRONMENT 33 6.8 DRAINAGE 33 6.9 ECOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT 33 6.9.1 Vegetation within the Study area 34 6.9.2 Wildlife Habitat and Faunal Diversity 35 Faunal Diversity 35 6.10 SOCIO ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT 36 6.10.1 Study Area 37 6.10.1 General Socioeconomic Profile 37 6.10.2 Gender Profile 43 6.10.3 Basic Amenities and Infrastructure 44 7 IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND MITIGATION MEASURES 46 7.1 POTENTIAL IMPACT 46 7.1.1 Impacts on Aesthetic and Visual Quality 49 7.1.2 Air & Noise Quality 49 7.1.3 Impact on Land use 50 7.1.4 Impact on Soil 50 7.1.5 Impact on Road & Traffic 51 7.1.6 Impact on Biological Environment 51 7.1.7 Potential Impact on Socio-economic Conditions 52 7.1.8 Community Health & Safety 54 7.1.9 Occupational, Health & Safety 55 8 STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT 56 8.1 IDENTIFICATION OF STAKEHOLDERS 56 8.2 SUMMARY OF STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATIONS 57 9 ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN 68 9.1 MITIGATION MEASURES 68 9.2 ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ACTION PLAN 76 9.2.1 Labour Management Plan 76 9.2.2 Gender Action Plan 77 9.2.3 Occupational Health and Safety Management Action Plan 78 9.2.4 Citizen Engagement Action Plan 78 9.3 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING & REPORTING 82 9.4 INSTITUTIONAL SETTING AND IMPLEMENTATION ARRANGEMENTS 87 10 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION 88 LIST OF TABLE Table 1.1 Details of the substation and interlinked projects (Scheme I) 2 Table 2.1 Regulations Triggered for the Project 5 Table 2.2 World Bank Policies Triggered for the Project 9 Table 3.2 Intersection of the Highways/Railway line with the TL Alignment 12 Table 3.3 Estimated number of towers in Scheme I 17 Table 3.4 Equipment and Material required for Transmission Line 19 Table 5.1 Environmental and Social details for Transmission Line 25 Table 5.2 Second Level Screening carried out during the ESIA 26 Table 6.1 List of the Villages Located Within Study Area 37 Table 6.2 Demographic Profile of the Study Area Villages 38 Table 6.3 Livelihood Profile in the Study Area 41 Table 7.1 Scoping Matrix for transmission line 47 Table 8.1 List of key stakeholders 57 Table 8.2 Details of Consultation 57 Table 8.3 Summary of Stakeholder Consultation 58 Table 9.1 Impact Mitigation Matrix 68 Table 9.2 Information Disclosure Plan 79 Table 9.3 Summary of Consultation Mechanism 80 Table 9.4 Monitoring Plan 82 Table 9.5 Responsibility Matrix 87 LIST OF FIGURE Figure 3.1 Administrative Setting of Panki - Chhatarpur TL Alignment 11 Figure 3.2 Panki - Chhatarpur TL Alignment on Satellite Imagery 13 Figure 3.3 Right of Way for 132 KV Transmission Line 15 Figure 3.4 Typical Electrical Clearance Diagram for Tower Type – DD2 (Suspension Tower) 16 Figure 3.5 Minimum clearance between conductor and trees 18 Figure 4.1 Two Stage Screening Process 22 Figure 4.2 Impact Assessment Process 24 LIST OF ANNEXURE Annexure 1: List of Sub Projects in JPSIP I Annexure 2: Alternative Alignments V Annexure 3: Minutes of Meeting of Community Consultation VII Annexure 4: General Conditions of Contract XXXII Annexure 5: DGMS Prescribed Permissible Limit of Ground Vibration XLIII Annexure 6: Labour Management Plan XLV Annexure 7: Health & Safety Management Plan (HSMP) Template LV Annexure 8: Format for Reporting of ESMP Implementation XLII Annexure 9: Format for Registering Grievance from Community/Project LXV Affected Persons Annexure 10: Assessment of Impact Significance LXVIII ABBREVIATIONS BMTPC - Building Material and Technology Promotion Council of India CEA – Central Electricity Authority CFC - Chlorofluorocarbon CGWB – Central Groundwater Authority Board CPCB – Central Pollution Control Board dB – Decibel DG – Diesel Generator DVC - Damodar Valley Corporation EA – Environmental Assessment EMP – Environmental Management Plan ERM – Environmental Resources Management ESIA- Environmental and Social Impact Assessment ESMF- Environmental and Social Management Framework ESZ – Eco-Sensitive Zone GCC- General Conditions of Contract GM – Gair Mazrua GOI – Government of India GPS – Global Positioning System GSS – Grid Sub Station IESE - Initial Environmental and Social Examination IMD – India Meteorological Department IS – Indian Standard IUCN – International Union for Conservation of Nature IWPA – Indian Wildlife Protection Act JPSIP- Jharkhand Power System Improvement Project JUSNL - Jharkhand Urja Sancharan Nigam Limited KL- Kilo Litre KLD – Kilo Litre per Day Km – Kilometer KVA – Kilo-Volts-Ampere MVA – Mega-Volts-Ampere NBWL – National Board of Wildlife NH- National Highway SPCB – State Pollution Control Board PCB – Polychlorinated Biphenyls PfA – Power for All PPP – Public Private Partnership PUCC – Pollution Under Control Certificate SCC- Special Conditions of Contract SF6 – Sulfur Hexafluoride TCE – TATA Consulting Engineer TL – Transmission Line WPR- Work Participation Ratio EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Jharkhand Urja Sancharan Nigam Limited (JUSNL) with financial assistance from the World Bank is implementing the transmission infrastructure development/upgradation under the Jharkhand Power System Improvement Project (JPSIP) and will include: (a) Creation of 25 new 132 kV substations, and (b) Development of associated 132 KV transmission lines of around 1800 km. These 25 substations and associated transmission lines have been organised into 26 schemes. This ESIA covers 132 kV D/C 3 Ph. Panki - Chhatarpur transmission line, which is part of Scheme I and is to be covered under Phase III of the project. The ESIA has been undertaken based on the outcome of initial walk over survey which identified a preferred alignment based on analysis of three potential alternatives associated with the Bee-line between the two end-points. The level of detail captured in the ESIA is primarily based on the inputs of the walk-over survey; an attempt is being made to include some of the detail emerging from the detailed survey exercise, which is being conducted in parallel by the Design Consultant at this time. More detailed information about the accurate alignment of the transmission line, specific parcels of land which the RoW will intersect, and the exact footprint of the transmission towers would be available during the next phase of project planning, involving Check Surveys is not covered in this ESIA. The transmission line, 132 kV D/C 3 Ph. Panki - Chhatarpur is planned to extend for a distance of 65.387 km and would fall in the district of Palamu. As per the plan, the RoW of the alignment would be 27 m and transmission towers are expected to be set up every 300-400 m (approx. 2-3 towers per km depending on terrain and other technical, environmental and social considerations), each occupying a land footprint of about 22 m square. Overall, they will run cross country and cover a physical, environmental and social landscape which is typical to the state of Jharkhand – a combination of plateau land exhibiting minor undulations and interspersed with flat terrain and hilly stretches. From the land use point of view, the line alignments would primarily cover agricultural, forest and barren/wasteland use types. The ends of the transmission line would originate from respective substation of Panki, which have access through road.

Load more