DOCSLIB.ORG

The Minimal Presence of Simone Forti Author(S): Virginia B

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

The Minimal Presence of Simone Forti Author(s): Virginia B. Spivey Reviewed work(s): Source: Woman's Art Journal, Vol. 30, No. 1 (SPRING/SUMMER 2009), pp. 11-18 Published by: Old City Publishing, Inc. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40605219 . Accessed: 21/01/2013 06:01 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Old City Publishing, Inc. is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Woman's Art Journal. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded on Mon, 21 Jan 2013 06:01:22 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions The MinimalPresence of SimoneForti By VirginiaB. Spivey May1961, a youngchoreographer named Simone Forti Theseissues converge in a studyof Simone Forti. Scholarly (b. 1935)presented "Five Dance Constructions and Some bias in arthistory has ignoredmany women like Forti.5 Her OtherThings," a concertof experimental dance, at Yoko situationwas compoundedby similarattitudes in the Ono'sChambers Street loft.1 A fewyears later, in November academythat viewed dance as an uncritical(often feminized) 1964,Forti' s ex-husband, Robert Morris, exhibited a group of artform, more rooted in bodilyexpression than intellectual sevensculptures at New York'sGreen Gallery. Commonly activity.6Another factor is that,like many women of the time, calledthe "Plywood Show," this exhibition marked a shiftin Fortichose not to promoteher own career, which she saw as criticalresponse to Morris and signaledan increasinginterest secondaryto herhusband's professional ambitions. Morris's amongart audiences in thereduced aesthetic that would interestin paintingfirst led thenewlywed couple to San becomeknown as Minimalism.Although some scholars have Franciscoin 1956and laterto New York.After divorcing notedMorris's plywood constructions resembled the props Morrisin 1960,Forti married Happenings artist Robert Fortiused in her dances, her Chambers Street performance is Whitman,who asked that she give up herown work and assist relativelyunknown to art historians.2The dancer and himwhile they tried to start a family.7 filmmakerYvonne Rainer later said: Whenher second marriage ended in 1966 and Forti returned toher theradical in dance tobe aheadof its time.... As career, developments predictedby [Forti'sconcert] proved way her had been established.This was then itwas as a vacuumsealed that choreography already things stood, though due tothe ofthe event. waswritten about it and dancers went on largely groundbreakingperformances Judson Nothing Dance a thatis discussedin art and and wenton Theater, group frequently dancing painters ex-painters making historicaltexts because of its focus.8 and theater It wouldbe interdisciplinary Although painterlyhappenings pieces. Yvonne Trisha andother memberscite anothertwo and half beforethe idea of a Rainer, Brown, Judson years Fortias a the factthat she never constructionto movementor situationwould significantinfluence, generate in the led toher omission. takehold.3 participated group'sperformances Today,Forti is well-knownamong dance scholars; yet, her name Forti'sinnovative choreography has longdeserved closer remainsunfamiliar tomost art historians.9 A closer look at her scrutiny,especially for its conceptual affinity toMinimalism of worknot only demonstrates Forti's importance to arthistory, the1960s. butalso underscoresthe vital exchange between avant-garde Minimalismin arthas typicallybeen discussed as a danceand visual art in the 1960s. movementoriginating in New York,when spare abstract Fortibegan her study of dance soon after she and Morris formsbegan to emergefrom the studios of Morris, Donald arrivedin San Francisco.By the timeof herfirst public Judd,Dan Flavin,Frank Stella, Carl Andre, and Sol LeWitt. performanceinDecember 1960, at New York's Reuben Gallery, Womenare conspicuously absent in thisnarrative, although shehad developeda distinctivechoreographic approach that femaleartists such as JoBaer, Anne Truitt, and Judy Gerowitz synthesizeda numberof influences.One of the most (betterknown as JudyChicago) were producing similar work importantwas AnnaHalprin, co-founder of San Francisco's atthe same time. In an effort to extendthe movement's narrow Halprin-LathropInstitute and a majorproponent of modern construction,scholars have recently acknowledged the range dance on theWest Coast. Around1956, Halprin became ofminimalist aesthetic practices that developed in theearly concernedabout the direction of contemporary dance, and she 1960s.4This new wave of researchis not art historical startedconducting experimental workshops at herhome in revisionism,but an attemptto restore Minimalism to its place MarinCounty.10 The goal was to exploreher preconceptions withinthe diverse artistic landscape of the period. Such an aboutwhat constituted dance, movement, and composition.11 endeavordemands thatart historyexpand to include Informedby Halprin' s knowledge of anatomy, Forti and other previouslyoverlooked individuals, and it forcesus to re- studentsanalyzed movement to determinewhether their examineMinimalism by recognizing how different disciplines actionswere executed in themost anatomically efficient way, wereintegral to its development. orwhether they were learned motions performed according to SPRING / SUMMER 2009 A This content downloaded on Mon, 21 Jan 2013 06:01:22 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Fig. 2. Simone Forti,Slant Board (1981), performanceby Simone Forti, ElinoreRadeff, and unidentifeddancer, Stedelijk Museum, Amsterdam. Photo: courtesySimone Forti. Forti's frustrationwith modem dance changed when she enteredRobert Dunn's dance workshop at theCunningham Schoolin thefall of 1960. Dunn had workedextensively with Cunninghamas a musicianand composerand had attended JohnCage's class,"Composition of Experimental Music," at the New School forSocial Researchfrom 1958-1960. 15 Influencedby the innovative atmosphere of Cage's seminar, Dunn'sinstruction drew from an eclecticrange of material, Fig. 1. Simone Forti,Plan for"Five Dance Constructionsand Some Other includingZen Buddhism,Taoism, and existentialism.16He Things" (1961), performanceat 112 Chambers Street,New YorkCity. introducedhis students to avant-garde music and explained to themJohn Cage's chance-based methods of composition. Forti habit.Improvisation proved Halprin's greatest tool during was impressedwith Cage's approachbecause it allowedfor theseyears, not as a meansof self-expression, butas a wayto indeterminacywhile retaininga sense of organized generateunpredictable actions.12 composition.She realized she could adapt his ideas to Aftermoving to New York, Forti took classes at the modern structureher own dances. danceschools of Martha Graham and Mercé Cunningham. In Anothersource of influence was thegroup of New York contrastto Halprin'sconcern with individual skills and Happeningsartists that included Robert Whitman, Allan limitations,Graham and Cunninghambased theirideas on Kaprow,and Jim Dine.17 Forti found the kind of "wild action" rigorousphysical demands of the balletically trained body. Forti thatcharacterized Whitman's theater pieces particularly foundboth choreographers' techniques extremely complicated intriguing.18He oftenimmersed spectators directly in his andfelt she could not keep up withwhat they asked her to do. performances,providing them an immediateexperience that Shedescribed her disappointment with Cunningham in her rangedfrom vaguely threatening to spectacular.Whitman's diary,"Mercé Cunningham was a masterof adult, isolated influenceis most apparent in Rollers, a dance Forti presented in articulation[ofdifferent parts of the body]. And that the thing I herperformance atthe Reuben Gallery in December 1960. Forti hadto offer was stillvery close to the holistic and generalized and PattyOldenburg each sat in a smallwooden box on responseof children."13 Forti, who also taught nursery school in wheelswith strings attached. Audience members were asked NewYork, felt more inspired watching her students at play. The to pull theperformers around the stage area whileboth children'sability to think clearly, to solveproblems directly, and womenwould sing a singlenote, holding it for the duration. tofind joy in simplerepeated actions resonated with her own As theboxes careened and veered dangerously, however, what straightforwardapproach to inquiry.14 began as a musical tone transformedinto a panicked, fi± WOMAN'SART JOURNAL This content downloaded on Mon, 21 Jan 2013 06:01:22 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions shriekingscream, rising and falling according to the boxes'uncontrollable movements. Fortihad soughta choreographicmethod that wouldstrike a balance between the absolute control of balletchoreographers and the freedomof pure improvisation.Drawing from the influencesof Halprin,Cage, and Whitman as wellas thechildren shetaught, her solution was to assignspecific tasks, use props,and setcertain limits for performers to negotiateaccording to theirparticular physical abilities.As Rollersdemonstrates, this strategy propelledaction in the dance, but remained outside of herimmediate control. Forti's work radically
Recommended publications
  • Performance and Interaction: Judson Dance Theater

    Performance and Interaction: Judson Dance Theater

    Performance and Interaction: Judson Dance Theater In 1980, Arlene Croce, a respected dance critic, said in a column in the New Yorker that Robert Wilson had been the main influence, after Merce Cunningham, on the choreography of the day. Yvonne Rainer responded angrily to what she saw as lack of perspective and knowledge of modern dance in a letter published in the performance magazine Live. The letter included a genealogy chart of contemporary dance and how it related to the visual arts world, which is shown here. Simone Forti was at the Judson Dance Theater with Brown and Rainer and also made an argument for dance as sculpture with her first minimalist works. Their objec- tives included the idea of actually involving the spectator’s gaze, rejecting the concept of audience as voyeur. Bibliography Krauss, Rosalind E. Passages in Modern Sculpture. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT, 1977. Lambert, Carrie. “More or Less Minimalism: Six Notes on Performance and Visual Art in the 60s” en: Goldstein, Ann. The close, simultaneous connections between dance and the visual arts in the 1960s A Minimal Future? Art as Object and 70s can be seen both in the works of Yvonne Rainer (1934), Trisha Brown (1936) 1958-1968. Los Angeles: Museum and Simone Forti (1935), which are exhibited in the room, and in the theoretical analyses of Contemporary Art; Cambridge: presented by Barbara Rose and Rosalind Krauss about the theatrical tone of sculpture MIT Press, cop., 2004. and minimal painting. Trio A, Rainer’s choreography created in 1966 as the first part of her tetralogy The Mind Rainer, Yvonne.
  • Wookey Current CV

    Wookey Current CV

    SARA HASTINGS WOOKEY [email protected] www.sarawookey.com CURRICULUM VITAE EDUCATION Master of Fine Arts, Dance University of California, Los Angeles 2008 Bachelor of Fine Arts, Dance Presidential Honors, The Ohio State University 1996 CHOREOGRAPHY & PERFORMANCE Disappearing Acts & Resurfacing Subjects: Concerns of (a) Dance Artist(s) 2013 Premiere: New Museum, NYC Trio A: Revisited and Reversed 2013 Premiere: Hammer Museum, Los Angeles Collaboration with dancer & choreographer Yvonne Rainer Trio A: Unplugged Premiere: Performance Space, Sydney 2013 Transmitting Trio A Premiere: VIVA! Performance Art Festival, Montreal 2011 Performing Navigations: (Re)Mapping the Museum 2010 Premiere: Hammer Museum, Los Angeles Walking L.A / (Sur)facing the City 2008 Premiere: Museum of Contemporary Art, San Diego Love’s Geography: Revisited 2006 Premiere: Stadschouwburg Theater, Brugges FACE 2003 Premiere: Frascati Theater, Amsterdam Surface 2002 Premiere: Theater aan het Spui, The Hague Fields on the 4th Floor 2001 Premiere: Kunstcentrum Vooruit, Gent The Skirt 2000 Premiere: Korzo Theater, The Hague Manner 2000 Premiere: Künstlerhaus gallery, Bremen Marion’s Hips 1998 Premiere: Korzo Theater, The Hague MUSEUM & GALLERY BASED PROJECTS Station to Station Dancer with Siobhan Davies Dance 2015 Barbican Center, London reDANCE Founder & Organizer 2011-Present Curated program of four dance solos by Judson Dance Era choreographers (Childs, Forti, Hay and Rainer) danced by another generation of dancers Yvonne Rainer: Dance Works Dancer 2014 Raven Row Gallery,
  • Russian Museums Visit More Than 80 Million Visitors, 1/3 of Who Are Visitors Under 18

    Russian Museums Visit More Than 80 Million Visitors, 1/3 of Who Are Visitors Under 18

    Moscow 4 There are more than 3000 museums (and about 72 000 museum workers) in Russian Moscow region 92 Federation, not including school and company museums. Every year Russian museums visit more than 80 million visitors, 1/3 of who are visitors under 18 There are about 650 individual and institutional members in ICOM Russia. During two last St. Petersburg 117 years ICOM Russia membership was rapidly increasing more than 20% (or about 100 new members) a year Northwestern region 160 You will find the information aboutICOM Russia members in this book. All members (individual and institutional) are divided in two big groups – Museums which are institutional members of ICOM or are represented by individual members and Organizations. All the museums in this book are distributed by regional principle. Organizations are structured in profile groups Central region 192 Volga river region 224 Many thanks to all the museums who offered their help and assistance in the making of this collection South of Russia 258 Special thanks to Urals 270 Museum creation and consulting Culture heritage security in Russia with 3M(tm)Novec(tm)1230 Siberia and Far East 284 © ICOM Russia, 2012 Organizations 322 © K. Novokhatko, A. Gnedovsky, N. Kazantseva, O. Guzewska – compiling, translation, editing, 2012 [email protected] www.icom.org.ru © Leo Tolstoy museum-estate “Yasnaya Polyana”, design, 2012 Moscow MOSCOW A. N. SCRiAbiN MEMORiAl Capital of Russia. Major political, economic, cultural, scientific, religious, financial, educational, and transportation center of Russia and the continent MUSEUM Highlights: First reference to Moscow dates from 1147 when Moscow was already a pretty big town.
  • Renoir, Impressionism, and Full-Length Painting

    Renoir, Impressionism, and Full-Length Painting

    FIRST COMPREHENSIVE STUDY OF RENOIR’S FULL-LENGTH CANVASES BRINGS TOGETHER ICONIC WORKS FROM EUROPE AND THE U.S. FOR AN EXCLUSIVE NEW YORK CITY EXHIBITION RENOIR, IMPRESSIONISM, AND FULL-LENGTH PAINTING February 7 through May 13, 2012 This winter and spring The Frick Collection presents an exhibition of nine iconic Impressionist paintings by Pierre-Auguste Renoir, offering the first comprehensive study of the artist’s engagement with the full-length format. Its use was associated with the official Paris Salon from the mid-1870s to mid- 1880s, the decade that saw the emergence of a fully fledged Impressionist aesthetic. The project was inspired by Renoir’s La Promenade of 1875–76, the most significant Impressionist work in the Frick’s permanent collection. Intended for public display, the vertical grand-scale canvases in the exhibition are among the artist’s most daring and ambitious presentations of contemporary subjects and are today considered masterpieces of Impressionism. The show and accompanying catalogue draw on contemporary criticism, literature, and archival documents to explore the motivation behind Renoir’s full-length figure paintings as well as their reception by critics, peers, and the public. Recently-undertaken technical studies of the canvases will also shed new light on the artist’s working methods. Works on loan from international institutions are La Parisienne from Pierre-Auguste Renoir (1841–1919), Dance at Bougival, 1883, oil on canvas, 71 5/8 x 38 5/8 inches, Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, Picture Fund; photo: © 2012 Museum the National Museum Wales, Cardiff; The Umbrellas (Les Parapluies) from The of Fine Arts, Boston National Gallery, London (first time since 1886 on view in the United States); and Dance in the City and Dance in the Country from the Musée d’Orsay, Paris.
  • Simone Forti Goes to the Zoo*

    Simone Forti Goes to the Zoo*

    Simone Forti with a lion cub at the Giardino Zoologico di Roma, 1968. Courtesy Simone Forti and The Box, LA. Simone Forti Goes to the Zoo* JULIA BRYAN-WILSON In the photograph, a young woman in a short skirt and sandals sits on a bench. With her crooked elbow, she braces her handbag to her body, tucking her large sketchpad into her armpit. She is petting a lion cub, and as she gazes down to witness the small but extraordinary fact of her hand on its fur, the ani- mal’s face turns towards the camera lens with closed eyes. This is dancer and choreographer Simone Forti on one of her many visits to the zoo during the brief time she lived in Rome in the late 1960s. Far from today’s “wildlife sanctu- aries” where animals can ostensibly wander freely, as the photo of this uncaged cub might suggest, the Giardino Zoologico di Roma offered a highly controlled environment in which animals lived within tight enclosures; Forti was here indulging in a staged, paid encounter, one that she characterized as “irre- sistible.”1 Irresistible because she was consistently moved by the creatures she drew and studied—moved as in stirred, or touched, as well as in shifted, or altered. As I argue, her dance practice changed dramatically as a result of the time she spent in Rome observing animal motions and interacting with other, animate forms of art. Petting a lion cub: irresistible, but still melancholy. Designed in part by German collector and merchant Carl Hagenbeck and built in 1911, the Roman zoo is an example of the turn-of-the-century “Hagenbeck revolution” in zoo architecture, which attempted to provide more naturalistic-appearing, open-air surroundings that were landscaped with artificial rocks and featured moats instead of bars, often creating tableaux of animals from different taxonomic * This article was made possible by the indefatigable Simone Forti, who talked with me, danced for me, and pulled all manner of documents and photographs out of her dresser drawers for me; thank you, Simone.
  • Brochure, Yvonne Rainer.Pdf

    Brochure, Yvonne Rainer.Pdf

    Yvonne Rainer Dia:Beacon Riggio Galleries 3 Beekman Street Beacon New York 12508 845 440 0100 www.diaart.org Dia Art Foundation presents Yvonne Rainer Program 1 'I! Saturday, October 22, and Sunday, October 23, 2011 1 pm and 3 pm Program 2 Saturday, February 25, and Sunday, February 26 , 201 2 12 pm and 2 pm Program 3 Saturday, May 12, 2012 1 pm and 3 pm related program Artists on Artists Lecture Series at Dia:Chelsea Babette Mangolte on Yvonne Rainer Monday, May 14, 2012, 6:30 pm Dia:Chelsea 535 West 22nd Street 5th Floor New York City Yvonne Rainer OBJECTS DANCES Central to Yvonne Rainer's renowned choreographic practice is an undeniable, 7 wistful rebellion. Immediately upon her emergence as a choreographer in the eliminate or minimize early 1960s, Rainer distinguished herself by actively challenging the expressive 1. role of the artist's hand phrasing J movement conventions and narrative structure popularized by the modern-dance establishment. Inspired by her interest in the everyday, Rainer pioneered an 2. hierarchical relationship of parts development and climax autonomous dance language-rooted in considering the body as material object­ 3. texture variation: rhythm, shape, dynamics that emphasized the nuances of task-oriented movement and brought attention 4. figure reference character to the physicality of the body. 5. illusionism performance After training for several years at the Martha Graham Dance School in New 6. complexity and detail variety: phrases and the spatial field York in the late 1950s, Rainer attended what would become an historic summer 7. monumentality the virtuosic movement feat and the workshop in San Francisco in 1960 guided by the improvisatory teachings of fully-extended body choreographer Anna Halprin and composer La Monte Young.
  • Judson Dance Theater: the Work Is Never Done

    Judson Dance Theater: the Work Is Never Done

    Judson Dance Theater: The Work Is Never Done Yvonne Rainer, Simone Forti, and Steve Paxton reflect on Robert Ellis Dunn and Judith Dunn’s composition class YVONNE RAINER: My name is Yvonne Rainer. SIMONE FORTI: I’m Simone Forti. STEVE PAXTON: My name is Steve Paxton. I’m a dancer. RAINER: Choreographer. FORTI: Artist. RAINER: Writer. Filmmaker. FORTI: I’ve mainly worked with movement. PAXTON: I came from Arizona with my banjo on my knee about 1958. RAINER: I felt I’d come into dance pretty late, so I was in a hurry in 1960. I mean, absorbing everything, and that included ballet. It included Cunningham, it included Waring and Cage. PAXTON: The modern dance world was not homogeneous. I mean, it wasn’t all just one big thing. There were a lot of different aesthetics and dance approaches in it. FORTI: When Bob Dunn offered his composition class, it was like something solid to work with. RAINER: I enrolled in Robert Dunn’s composition class in the fall of 1960. At that point there were only five of us. And Bob rolled out these scores for John Cage’s Fontana Mix and started talking about ways that score might be adapted for choreographic purposes. FORTI: I remember the scores themselves, transferring into movement rather than sound. RAINER: I was looking for some other way to look at things. I mean, painters were defying all the rules already and Cage came along and introduced a whole new vocabulary of sounds and movements. PAXTON: Chance methods meant that instead of trying to imagine a new way to do something, you just set out using dice, coins to decide what part of the body to use or entrances and exits and length durations.
  • Download, Or Email Articles for Individual Use

    Download, Or Email Articles for Individual Use

    Dance Chronicle, 37:122–128, 2014 Copyright © 2014 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC ISSN: 0147-2526 print / 1532-4257 online DOI: 10.1080/01472526.2014.876598 A Self-Critical Phenomenology of Criticism JOSHUA M. HALL Living in an Artworld By Noel¨ Carroll. 388 pp. Louisville, Ky.: Chicago Spectrum Press, 2012. $22.50. ISBN 978-158374-220-4. Noel¨ Carroll, a central figure in analytic (Anglo-American) philosophy of art, and spouse of renowned dance scholar Sally Banes (who co-authored several of these essays), offers us something remarkable in his new book—namely, a collection of thirty years of his theoretical essays and dance reviews. Carroll wrote some of the pieces while he was a graduate student at the Univer- sity of Illinois, Chicago, and there have been some dramatic changes since then in both the art world and Carroll’s philosophical views. Thus, he mod- estly characterizes the book as “an archeological artifact” of a “somewhat confessional” variety (p. 267). Inspired by Carroll, I too will adopt an arche- ological stance, with a promise that the reader’s patience will be repaid with something surprising at the end of the dig. To begin with a panoramic view of the site: Living in an Artworld is divided into three sections, on dance, performance/theater, and the fine arts, respectively. I will focus primarily on the dance section (because I am writing for a dance studies readership, and my own background is in dance), but the most helpful point of entry into the book is to be found in Carroll’s present- day introduction to the fine arts section.
  • Letters from Yvonne Rainer, Meredith Monk, Kenneth King

    Letters from Yvonne Rainer, Meredith Monk, Kenneth King

    Letters from Yvonne Rainer, Meredith Monk, Kenneth King In her New Yorker column of June 30 temporary American dance, perform- dance critic Arlene Croce claimed that ance art and theatre - and critics who R.E.: Robert Wilson "as a writer and director have a historical grasp of the overlapping of esoteric visionary plays and as a performance and art worlds - has con- teacher of movement has been the biggest tributed to the confusion in the perform- influence, after Cunningham, on chore- ance world. Critics and audiences alike ographers working today." Croce disre- have trouble deciding who's influencing CROCE garded the early work of Yvonne Rainer, who these days. Some of those artists Kenneth King, Meredith Monk, Lucinda angry enough to respond to Croce in Childs. and the Judson Dance Theatre. print have forwarded their letters to LIVE for publication. The absence of accurate histories of con- The Editors Dear Arlene: other than a sequence of one-man/woman epiphanies. Things are May I add my two-cents plain to the brouhaha accruing from your always more complicated than that. True, Cunningham/Cage were article of June 30? Insofar as Kenneth King has done so admirable doing their thing 30 years ago. But why was their influence a job (and one with which I largely concur) on the Monk-King-- in the dance world not felt in any visible degree until 1960? Clear- Dean-Wilson-Glass connections, let me confine my remarks to my ly it required a convergence of a number of people from different own peers. For this purpose I am enclosing a crudely drawn-and areas of art-making to manifest the ideas that in the intervening vastly oversimplified-genealogy chart which adds several 10 years had lain fallow.
  • Fluxus: the Is Gnificant Role of Female Artists Megan Butcher

    Fluxus: the Is Gnificant Role of Female Artists Megan Butcher

    Pace University DigitalCommons@Pace Honors College Theses Pforzheimer Honors College Summer 7-2018 Fluxus: The iS gnificant Role of Female Artists Megan Butcher Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/honorscollege_theses Part of the Contemporary Art Commons, and the Other History Commons Recommended Citation Butcher, Megan, "Fluxus: The iS gnificant Role of Female Artists" (2018). Honors College Theses. 178. https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/honorscollege_theses/178 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Pforzheimer Honors College at DigitalCommons@Pace. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors College Theses by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Pace. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Abstract The Fluxus movement of the 1960s and early 1970s laid the groundwork for future female artists and performance art as a medium. However, throughout my research, I have found that while there is evidence that female artists played an important role in this art movement, they were often not written about or credited for their contributions. Literature on the subject is also quite limited. Many books and journals only mention the more prominent female artists of Fluxus, leaving the lesser-known female artists difficult to research. The lack of scholarly discussion has led to the inaccurate documentation of the development of Fluxus art and how it influenced later movements. Additionally, the absence of research suggests that female artists’ work was less important and, consequently, keeps their efforts and achievements unknown. It can be demonstrated that works of art created by little-known female artists later influenced more prominent artists, but the original works have gone unacknowledged.
  • PDF Released for Review Purposes Only. Not for Publication Or Wide Distribution

    PDF Released for Review Purposes Only. Not for Publication Or Wide Distribution

    JUDSON Giampaolo Bianconi is Thomas J. Lax is Associate Julia Robinson is Associate In the early 1960s, an assembly of choreographers, visual artists, composers, and Curatorial Assistant in the Curator in the Department of Professor of Modern and filmmakers made use of a church in New York’s Greenwich Village to present Judson Dance Theater The Work Is Never Done Department of Media and Media and Performance Art Contemporary Art at New performances that redefined the kinds of movement that could be understood as Performance Art at MoMA. at MoMA. York University. She is the dance—performances that Village Voice critic Jill Johnston would declare the most editor of the October Files exciting in a generation. The group was Judson Dance Theater, its name borrowed Harry C. H. Choi is a Twelve- Victor “Viv” Liu was a volume John Cage (2011) from Judson Memorial Church, the socially engaged Protestant congregation Month Intern in the Department Seasonal Intern in the and the author of a forthcom- that hosted the dancers’ open workshops. The Judson artists emphasized new DANCE of Media and Performance Art Department of Media and ing book on George Brecht. compositional methods meant to strip dance of its theatrical conventions and fore- at MoMA. Performance Art at MoMA. Robinson is an active curator. grounded “ordinary” movements—gestures more likely to be seen on the street or at home. Although Judson Dance Theater would last only a few years, the artists affili- Vivian A. Crockett is the Jenny Harris is Curatorial Gloria Sutton is Associate ated with it, including Trisha Brown, Lucinda Childs, Philip Corner, Bill Dixon, Judith 2017–18 Andrew W.
  • Fluxus Family Reunion

    Fluxus Family Reunion

    FLUXUS FAMILY REUNION - Lying down: Nam June Paik; sitting on the floor: Yasunao Tone, Simone Forti; first row: Yoshi Wada, Sara Seagull, Jackson Mac Low, Anne Tardos, Henry Flynt, Yoko Ono, La Monte Young, Peter Moore; second row: Peter Van Riper, Emily Harvey, Larry Miller, Dick Higgins, Carolee Schneemann, Ben Patterson, Jon Hendricks, Francesco Conz. (Behind Peter Moore: Marian Zazeela.) Photo by Josef Astor taken at the Emily Harvey Gallery published in Vanity Fair, July 1993. EHF Collection Fluxus, Concept Art, Mail Art Emily Harvey Foundation 537 Broadway New York, NY 10012 March 7 - March 18, 2017 1PM - 6:30PM or by appointment Opening March 7 - 6pm The second-floor loft at 537 Broadway, the charged site of Fluxus founder George Maciunas’s last New York workspace, and the Grommet Studio, where Jean Dupuy launched a pivotal phase of downtown performance art, became the Emily Harvey Gallery in 1984. Keeping the door open, and the stage lit, at the outset of a new and complex decade, Harvey ensured the continuation of these rare—and rarely profitable—activities in the heart of SoHo. At a time when conventional modes of art (such as expressive painting) returned with a vengeance, and radical practices were especially under threat, the Emily Harvey Gallery became a haven for presenting work, sharing dinners, and the occasional wedding. Harvey encouraged experimental initiatives in poetry, music, dance, performance, and the visual arts. In a short time, several artist diasporas made the gallery a new gravitational center. As a record of its founder’s involvements, the Emily Harvey Foundation Collection features key examples of Fluxus, Concept Art, and Mail Art, extending through the 1970s and 80s.