University of Minnesota Law School Scholarship Repository Minnesota Law Review 1962 Sex Censorship: The Assumptions of Anti- Obscenity Laws and the Empirical Evidence Robert B. Cairns James C.N. Paul Julius Wishner Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/mlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Cairns, Robert B.; Paul, James C.N.; and Wishner, Julius, "Sex Censorship: The Assumptions of Anti-Obscenity Laws and the Empirical Evidence" (1962). Minnesota Law Review. 2209. https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/mlr/2209 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Minnesota Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Minnesota Law Review collection by an authorized administrator of the Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact
[email protected]. 1009 Sex Censorship: The Assumptions of Anti-Obscenity Laws and the Empirical Evidencet In the following Article, a lawyer and two behavioral scientists explore the consequences of exposure to ob- scenity. Their main purpose is to summarize the empiri- cally demonstrated effects of psychosexual stimuli. In doing so, the authors examine and analyze the behavior- al science investigations in this area. The Article points out that the effects of sexual stimuli have rarely been studied in adequately controlled experimental investiga- tions. This situation, of course, makes definite conclusions impossible. The authors, however, do evaluate that which is available and these evaluations will provide the reader with further insight into the problem at hand. Robert B. Cairns* James C. N. Paul** Julius Wishner*** While concepts of "obscenity" may be very old, albeit ambigu- ous, most English and American laws on the subject are com- paratively recent: they are of Nineteenth Century origin, and they *Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, Indiana University.