DOCSLIB.ORG

A Viable International Tax-Order for Cross-Border Pensions

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Viable International Tax-Order for Cross-Border Pensions University of Konstanz Department of Economics A Viable International Tax-Order for Cross-Border Pensions Bernd Genser & Robert Holzmann Working Paper Series 2018-02 https://ideas.repec.org/s/knz/dpteco.html A Viable International Tax-Order for Cross-Border Pensions Bernd Genser 1 and Robert Holzmann 2 (March 1, 2018) Abstract There is strong evidence that the existing pattern of cross-border pension taxation in OECD countries and beyond is extremely diverse and inconsistent and thus generates a double equity dilemma for individuals and countries alike. We argue that this dilemma cannot be solved within the current double-taxation treaty network and therefore propose a new conceptual framework for the taxation of old-age pensions in a world of high and increasing cross-border mobility of workers and pensioners. We demonstrate that a coordinated move to a front- loaded pension tax system and exclusive source taxation would pave the way for an international pension tax order which eliminates the double equity dilemma. As an additional innovative element of front-loaded pension taxation we discuss the decoupling of individual tax assessment and tax payment which may prove helpful by smoothing transitional effects when the front-loaded pension tax system is introduced. Keywords: pension taxation, international taxation, international migration, double taxation convention JEL classification numbers: H2, H20, H55, H87, F22 1 Professor of Economics, University of Konstanz (retired) 2 Professor of Economics and Fellow of the Austrian Academy of Sciences (Vienna), with honorary chairs at the Centre of Excellence in Population Ageing Research, University of New South Wales (Sydney) and the Social Security Research Centre, University of Malaya (Kuala Lumpur) 2 1 Introduction In many OECD countries the taxation of old-age income has become an issue in recent tax reforms. There are several reasons for this new focus of tax policy. First, longer pension periods due to aging and generous retirement rules have increased the number of pensioners and the share of old-age income in the national income tax base. Second, many countries implemented deferred taxation of statutory and occupational pensions, following a recommendation the EU Commission which was released as a byproduct of Commission’s initiatives to ensure the portability of old-age pensions for migrants. Finally, pension reforms and the move toward multi-pillar systems have increased the variety of old-age income sources and tax policy frequently legislated specific tax rules for these new forms of pensions. An OECD stocktaking of old-age pensions reveals a three-pillar mix of public, occupational, and personal retirement income’ provisions with expanding new components which were introduced to cope with the fiscal pressure of the mandated pension scheme (OECD 2017). Moreover, countries supported in particular new forms of occupational and personal retirement savings through tax preferences or direct subsidies. As a matter of fact the taxation of different forms of retirement savings that is more aligned with the principle of consumption-type income taxation created substantial deviations from the principle of comprehensive income taxation which is still regarded as the benchmark income tax system across OECD member countries. The blending of comprehensive income standard with selective expenditure tax elements generates inconsistencies in old-age income taxation and they are the source of inequities in pension taxation among pensioners who are enrolled in different mandatory pension schemes or use the room for strategic pension planning. Increasing international mobility of workers and retirees is another source of interpersonal inequity.3 Following the blueprint of the OECD model convention to prevent double taxation on income and wealth the existing network of bilateral double taxation treaties pays attention to cross-border pension benefits (see Annex 7.2), but these rules do not exclude interpersonal inequities between recipients of domestic and cross-border pension benefits. The international treaty network also generates international inequities among signatory states which are unable to recoup income tax revenue losses if pension savers emigrate. The paper is organized as follows. In section 2 we provide some evidence that the existing pattern of pension taxation is extremely diverse and inconsistent. In section 3 we explain why diverse forms of national pension taxation and residence taxation of cross-border pension benefits are responsible for interpersonal and international equity conflicts and why unilateral and/or bilateral approaches to solve the double equity dilemma within the current OECD double taxation model treaty framework will not prove successful. In section 4 we present a new conceptual framework of front-loaded pension taxation which can consistently be combined with exclusive source taxation to get rid of the equity dilemma for individuals and countries. As an additional innovative element of front-loaded pension taxation we discuss the 3 A pre-condition for the taxation of cross-border pensions is, of course, that pensions in disbursement and pensions rights in accumulation are in a first instance made portable between countries. The instruments to make them fully portable include agreements at bi- and multilateral level, the use of transnational providers and the redesign of benefits. See Holzmann and Koettle (2015), Holzmann (2017) and Holzmann (2018). 3 separation of individual front-loaded pension tax assessment and income tax payment as a potential cushion when the new system is introduced. In a final section we summarize our findings and raise the question, whether the “multiple instruments” approach would be a suitable vehicle to establish a consistent international tax order for cross-border pension taxation. 2 The state of taxation of cross-border pensions Income taxation in most OECD countries is codified according to the Schanz/Haig/Simons principle of comprehensive income taxation, which regards any annual increase in personal wealth as taxable income. This is uncontroversial for individual pension wealth which is accumulated in financial institutions like pension funds, insurance companies or banks and which increases an individuals’ ability to pay and should therefore be taxed as a component of comprehensive income. Economically it is also true for notional pension wealth within a statutory or mandatory occupational pension system, because individual pension claims under these systems increase ability-to-pay, although pension benefits are not capital-funded by financed on a pay-as-you basis. In fact this difference between funded and unfunded pensions has led to a different tax treatment of pension benefits. To compare national pension tax practices we distinguish three phases of capital accumulation in which income taxes can or should be levied: capital saving, returns on capital wealth, dissaving or withdrawal of wealth. Technically comprehensive income taxation of saving can be characterized by a T-T-E income tax, where T indicates that the respective income flow is taxed at the going tax rate and E indicates that it is tax exempt. With respect to old-age pensions comprehensive income taxation T-T-E would require that income used to contribute to a pension system should be taxed, growing pensions claims as returns to pension wealth should be taxed as well but withdrawals of pension wealth are tax-exempt. In contrast to the comprehensive income principle most national income tax codes tax pay-as-you-go financed pension E-E-T, which implies to exempt pension contributions and accruals in pension claims and to tax withdrawals of pension benefits. The coexistence of both forms of pension taxation reflects the long-lasting dispute among public economists to tax capital income uniformly and consistently either according to T-T-E (Schanz/Haig/Simons) or E-E-T (Fisher/Kaldor). But it is also backed by the understanding of tax practicioners and tax lawyers who deny any discrimination in pension taxation ifstatutory pensions are preferentially taxed as (deferred) labor income and funded pensions are double-taxed as capital income. In Table 1 we provide a survey on pension taxation in European and four non-European OECD countries which shows a much broader variety of tax rules for different forms of pensions. To capture the different tax rules we introduce t and s to indicate that in a certain phase of the capital cycle a lower tax rate t<T or even a subsidy rate s is applied. In our sample a majority of countries apply expenditure taxation (E-E-T) and none of them comprehensive income taxation (T-T-E) to statutory pensions. Few of them impose a slightly higher income tax burden, but many offer additional tax preferences to statutory pensions down to a complete tax exemption through all three phases of the pension cycle. Sweden is the only country for which we found a pension tax relief by not only deducting social security 4 contributions from the personal income tax base but granting a full tax credit for these contributions. The taxation of occupational and personal pensions reveals a similar pattern with a less dominating cluster of countries using E-E-T. But columns 3 and 4 also exhibit a significantly broader scope of complexity, reaching from comprehensive income taxation down to full exemption of occupational as well as personal pensions over all three phases of the pension cycle. In addition to the different forms of tax treatment which
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Retirement Accumulation 18 VIII CONTENTS
    Nonfi nancial Defi ned Contribution Pension Schemes in a Changing Pension World Nonfi nancial Defi ned Contribution Pension Schemes in a Changing Pension World VOLUME 2 GENDER, POLITICS, AND FINANCIAL STABILITY Robert Holzmann, Edward Palmer, and David Robalino, editors © 2013 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street NW Washington DC 20433 Telephone: 202-473-1000 Internet: www.worldbank.org Some rights reserved 1 2 3 4 15 14 13 12 This work is a product of the staff of The World Bank with external contributions. Note that The World Bank does not necessarily own each component of the content included in the work. The World Bank therefore does not warrant that the use of the content contained in the work will not infringe on the rights of third parties. The risk of claims resulting from such infringement rests solely with you. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this work do not necessarily reflect the views of The World Bank, its Board of Executive Directors, or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorse- ment or acceptance of such boundaries. Nothing herein shall constitute or be considered to be a limitation upon or waiver of the privileges and immunities of The World Bank, all of which are specifically reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Holzmann Steen J0rgensen
    SP DISCUSSION PAPER NO. 0006 21314 Public Disclosure Authorized Social Risk Management: 0 QANew Conceptual Framework for Social Protection and Beyond Public Disclosure Authorized ~ =F_ Robert Holzmann Steen J0rgensen February2000 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Prot tton LABOR MARKETS, PENSIONS SOCIAEASSISTANCE T HE W O R L D B A N K Social Risk Management: A new conceptual framework for Social Protection and beyond Robert Holzmann Steen J0rgensen` February 2000 Social Protection Discussion Paper No. 0006 Abstract This paper proposes a new definition and conceptual framework for Social Protection grounded in Social Risk Management. The concept repositions the traditional areas of Social Protection (labor market intervention, social insurance and social safety nets) in a framework that includes three strategies to deal with risk (prevention, mitigation and coping), three levels of formality of risk management (informal, market-based, public) and many actors (individuals, households, communities, NGOs, governments at various levels and international organizations) against the background of asymmetric information and different types of risk. This expanded view of Social Protection emphasizes the double role of risk management instruments - protecting basic livelihood as well as promoting risk taking. It focuses specifi- cally on the poor since they are the most vulnerable to risk and typically lack appropriate risk management instruments, which constrains them from engaging in riskier but also higher return activities and hence gradually moving out of chronic poverty. Director, Social Protection, Hurnan Development Network, The World Bank Tel.: (1-202) 473.0004, Email: [email protected] Sector Manager, Social Protection, Human Development Network, The World Bank Tel.: (1-202) 473.4062, Email: [email protected] I.
    [Show full text]
  • Robert Holzmann World Bank Topics
    Population Aging, Public Expenditures and Financial/Economic Crises: (Re-)establishing priorities? Brussels Economic Forum 2009 Beyond the crisis: a changing economic landscape Brussels, May 15, 2009 Robert Holzmann World Bank Topics I.I. Aging and public expenditure: From projections to policy simulations II. Aging, economic crisis and the future of multimulti--pillarpillar pension schemes I. Aging and public expenditure: Beyond projections … ••KudosKudos to AWG: Very impressive process, approach and results; international best practice ••PopulationPopulation aging is a worldworld--widewide phenomenon but the “North” is subject to two effects: Increasing share of elderly and low or negative labor force growth, with consequences for expenditure shares as well as benefit levels (through internal rate of return, i.e. employment plus productivity growth) ••ForFor EUEU--widewide policy actions important to move beyond projections to policy simulations about key triggers to avoid expenditure crisis while delivering expected social benefits Old-age dependency ratio (ratio of people aged 65 or above relative to the working-age population) 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Africa India World Asia Oceania Latin United Northern China Russian Europe EU27 Japan America States America Federation 1950 2000 2050 Table 3. Annual Growth Rates of the Labor Force, 2005–50 Percent Country Medium variant Zero migration Difference China −0.28 −0.25 0.03 Europe and Russia −0.68 −0.85 −0.17 High Income East Asia and Pacific −0.56 −0.75 −0.19 North America 0.44 −0.12 −0.56 Latin America a nd Caribbean 0.83 0.95 0.12 Low and Middle Income East Asia and Pacific 0.79 0.86 0.07 Middle East, North Africa, and Turkey 1.36 1.38 0.02 South and Central Asia 1.25 1.29 0.04 Sub-Saharan Africa 2.32 2.34 0.02 Total 0.77 0.77 0.00 Sources: United Nations (2005); author’s calculations.
    [Show full text]
  • What Are NDC Pension Systems? What Do They Bring to Reform Strategies?
    [Final Revision: 06 March 2004] What are NDC Pension Systems? What Do They Bring to Reform Strategies? Axel Börsch-Supan Mannheim Institute for the Economics of Aging (MEA), Mannheim University National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge, Mass., USA ABSTRACT This paper has two parts. Part 1 presents the basic ideas underlying notional defined contribution (NDC) systems and discusses their main advantages and disadvantages. We argue that a NDC system is mainly a political device. It makes parametric reform, badly needed to stabilize the pay-as-you-go (PAYG) pillars all over the World, easier because it exposes the trade-offs and clarifies concepts. It may also change the microeconomics of labor supply and savings. It does not, however, change the macroeconomics of PAYG systems and thus does not substitute for the introduction of pre-funded second and third pillars. NDC systems can be installed as individual account systems, as done most prominently in Sweden. However, they can also be mimicked by a set of rules in a conventional defined benefits PAYG system, showing that NDC systems are more a political than economic devices. Part 2 describes how the German pension reform proposals made in late summer 2003 effectively introduce a NDC system without explicit NDC-type accounting. Address: Mannheim Research Institute for the Economics of Aging, (MEA), Department of Economics, Mannheim University L13,17 D-68131 Mannheim, Germany e-mail: [email protected] Acknowledgements: This paper has been written for the World Bank – RFV Conference on NDC Pensions in Sandhamn, Sweden, September 29-30. It takes as point of departure and owes much intellectual debt to Richard Disney’s 1999 paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Status and Progress in Cross-Border Portability of Social Security Benefits
    DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES IZA DP No. 11481 Status and Progress in Cross-Border Portability of Social Security Benefits Robert Holzmann Jacques Wels APRIL 2018 DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES IZA DP No. 11481 Status and Progress in Cross-Border Portability of Social Security Benefits Robert Holzmann Austrian Academy of Sciences, University of New South Wales, University of Malaya, IZA and CESifo Jacques Wels University of Cambridge and Université libre de Bruxelles APRIL 2018 Any opinions expressed in this paper are those of the author(s) and not those of IZA. Research published in this series may include views on policy, but IZA takes no institutional policy positions. The IZA research network is committed to the IZA Guiding Principles of Research Integrity. The IZA Institute of Labor Economics is an independent economic research institute that conducts research in labor economics and offers evidence-based policy advice on labor market issues. Supported by the Deutsche Post Foundation, IZA runs the world’s largest network of economists, whose research aims to provide answers to the global labor market challenges of our time. Our key objective is to build bridges between academic research, policymakers and society. IZA Discussion Papers often represent preliminary work and are circulated to encourage discussion. Citation of such a paper should account for its provisional character. A revised version may be available directly from the author. IZA – Institute of Labor Economics Schaumburg-Lippe-Straße 5–9 Phone: +49-228-3894-0 53113 Bonn, Germany Email: [email protected] www.iza.org IZA DP No. 11481 APRIL 2018 ABSTRACT Status and Progress in Cross-Border Portability of Social Security Benefits The importance of cross-border portability of social benefits is increasing in parallel with the rise in the absolute number of international migrants and their share of the world population, and perhaps more importantly, with the rising share of world population that for some part of their life is working and/or retiring abroad.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science, Vol
    - 50- References Aaron, Henry 1., 1966, "The Social Insurance Paradox," Canadian Journal ofEconomics and Political Science, Vol. 32 (August), pp. 371-74. _~, 1982, Economic Effects ofSocial Security (Washington: Brookings Institution). Agulnik, Phil, 2000, "Maintaining Incomes After Work: Do Compulsory Earnings-Related Pensions Make Sense?" Oxford Review ofEconomic Policy, Vol. 16, Issue 1, pp. 45- 56. _--" and Nicholas A, Barr 2000, "The PubliclPrivate Mix in u.K. Pension Policy," World Economics, Vol. 1 (January-March), pp. 69-80. Arenas de Mesa, Alberto, and Mario Marcel, 1999, "Fiscal Effects of Social Security Reform in Chile: The Case of the Minimum Pension" paper presented at the APEC second regional forum on pension funds reforms, Viiia del Mar, Chile, April 26-27. Asher, Mukul G., 1999, "The Pension System in Singapore," Social Protection Discussion PaperNo. 9919 (Washington: World Bank). Atkinson, A B., 1999, The Economic Consequences ofRolling Back the Welfare State (Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press). Auerbach, Alan J., and Laurence 1. Kotlikoff, 1990, "Demographics, Fiscal Policy, and U.S. Saving in the 1980s and Beyond," in Tax Policy and the Economy, ed. by Lawrence H. Summers, Vol. 4 (Cambridge, Massachusetts: National Bureau of Economic Research and MIT Press). Auerbach, Alan J., et al., 1989, "The Economic Dynamics of Ageing Populations: The Case of Four OECD Countries," OECD Working Paper No. 62 (paris: OECD). Australia, Department of Family and Community Services, 1998, "The Australian System of Social Protection-What (overseas) Economists Should Know," paper presented at a research agenda conference on "Income Support, Labour Markets and Behaviour," Australian National University, Canberra. Barr, Nicholas A, 1979, "Myths My Grandpa Taught Me," Three Banks Review, No.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    SOCIAL PROTECTION & JOBS DISCUSSION PAPER Public Disclosure Authorized No. 1927 | April 2019 Public Disclosure Authorized The Politics of NDC Pension Scheme Diffusion: Constraints and Drivers Igor Guardiancich, R. Kent Weaver, Gustavo Demarco, and Mark C. Dorfman Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized © 2019 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street NW Washington DC 20433 Telephone: +1 (202) 473 1000 Internet: www.worldbank.org This work is a product of the staff of The World Bank with external contributions. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this work do not necessarily reflect the views of The World Bank, its Board of Executive Directors, or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS The material in this work is subject to copyright. Because The World Bank encourages dissemination of its knowledge, this work may be reproduced, in whole or in part, for noncommercial purposes as long as full attribution to this work is given. Any queries on rights and licenses, including subsidiary rights, should be addressed to World Bank Publications, The World Bank Group, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433, USA; fax: +1 (202) 522 2625; e-mail: [email protected]. Abstract: Nonfinancial defined contribution (NDC) schemes offer governments desirable properties in terms of efficiency, fairness, and financial sustainability and an opportunity to deflect the blame for pension cuts.
    [Show full text]
  • Cesifo Working Paper No. 5715 Category 3: Social Protection January 2016
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Holzmann, Robert Working Paper Taxing Pensions of an Internationally Mobile Labor Force: Portability Issues and Taxation Options CESifo Working Paper, No. 5715 Provided in Cooperation with: Ifo Institute – Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich Suggested Citation: Holzmann, Robert (2016) : Taxing Pensions of an Internationally Mobile Labor Force: Portability Issues and Taxation Options, CESifo Working Paper, No. 5715, Center for Economic Studies and ifo Institute (CESifo), Munich This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/128421 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu Taxing Pensions of an Internationally Mobile Labor Force: Portability Issues and Taxation Options Robert Holzmann CESIFO WORKING PAPER NO.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    CURRICULUM VITAE First and last name: Marek Dabrowski Date and place of birth: April 13, 1951, Bydgoszcz (Poland) e-mail address: [email protected] Web profiles: http://www.case-research.eu/en/marek-dabrowski, http://bruegel.org/author/marek-dabrowski/ http://www.hse.ru/en/org/persons/112929885 http://www.linkedin.com/pub/marek-dabrowski/11/2b5/132 http://ideas.repec.org/f/pda247.html http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=341944 http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Marek_Dabrowski/?ev=prf_highl https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=obCaWocAAAAJ&hl=en https://hse-ru.academia.edu/MarekDabrowski http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7960-8734 Summary: Dr. Marek Dabrowski is a Non-Resident Scholar at Bruegel, Brussels, Professor of the Higher School of Economics in Moscow, Co-founder and Fellow at CASE - Center for Social and Economic Research in Warsaw. He was a co-founder of CASE (1991), former Chairman of its Supervisory Council and President of Management Board (1991-2011), Chairman of the Supervisory Board of CASE Ukraine in Kyiv (1999-2009 and 2013-2015), and Member of the Board of Trustees and Scientific Council of the E.T. Gaidar Institute for Economic Policy in Moscow (1996-2016). He also held positions of the First Deputy Minister of Finance of Poland (1989-1990), Member of Parliament (1991-1993) and Member of the Monetary Policy Council of the National Bank of Poland (1998-2004). Since the end of 1980s he has been involved in policy advising and policy research in Azerbaijan, Belarus, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Egypt, Georgia, Iraq, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Macedonia, Moldova, Mongolia, Montenegro, Poland, Romania, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Serbia, Syria, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, Uzbekistan and Yemen, and in a number of international research projects related to monetary and fiscal policies, growth and poverty, currency crises, international financial architecture, perspectives of European integration, European Neighborhood Policy and political economy of transition.
    [Show full text]
  • Pensions in a Globalizing World: How Do (N)DC and (N)DB Schemes Fare and Compare on Portability and Taxation?
    WORKING PAPER INAPP WP n. 39 Pensions in a Globalizing World: How Do (N)DC and (N)DB Schemes Fare and Compare on Portability and Taxation? Bernd Genser Robert Holzmann LUGLIO 2019 Pensions in a Globalizing World: How Do (N)DC and (N)DB Schemes Fare and Compare on Portability and Taxation? Bernd Genser [email protected] Robert Holzmann [email protected] LUGLIO 2019 CONTENTS: 1. Introduction. – 2. The rise of international labor and benefit mobility. – 3. Portability issues: Objectives, instruments, and DB-DC comparison; 3.1 Objectives of portability; 3.2 Instruments of portability; 3.2.1 Portability arrangements between countries; 3.2.2 Multinational private sector providers; 3.2.3 Changes in benefit design; 3.3 NDB and NDC schemes compared. – 4. The taxation of cross-border pensions: Facts, issues, and suggested solutions; 4.1 The state of taxation of cross-border pensions; 4.2 The incompatibility of deferred income taxation and OECD model tax convention; 4.3 A new framework for pretaxed pension income; 4.3.1 The starting position; 4.3.2 The proposal; 4.3.3 Three tax payment options. – 5. Frontloaded taxation, payment options, and DB and DC in comparison; 5.1 The frontloaded tax assessment and immediate payment option; 5.2 The frontloaded tax assessment and deferred payment option; 5.3 The frontloaded tax assessment and distributed payment option. – 6. Conclusions. – References. – Appendix 1. Two-letter country abbreviations subject to ISO code 3166. – Appendix 2. OECD Model Tax Convention on Income and on Capital INAPP – Istituto nazionale per l’analisi delle politiche pubbliche Corso d’Italia 33 Tel.
    [Show full text]
  • Robert Holzmann World Bank & University of Vienna
    The Role of MDC Approach in Improving Pension Coverage Workshop on the Potential for Matching Defined Contribution (MDC) Schemes Washington, DC, June 6-7, 2011 Robert Holzmann World Bank & University of Vienna Background and Motivation Social policy concerns about low and stagnating coverage of pensions (and other key social) programs in LICs and MICs Economic concerns about high and at times rising level of informality and perceived negative effects of other options. Fiscal concerns about the costs of coverage expansion and sustained informality Expectations about better outcomes from MDC approach fostered by theoretical and empirical insights, and country pilots Yet there is little consolidated knowledge to provide substantiated policy guidance Variation in Coverage and Correlation with Per-Capita Income 100 Japan Switzerland Austria Germany Norway United States SwedenNetherlands Canada 90 FinlandUnited Kingdom Denmark Greece France Av. OECDItaly Belgium Portugal Spain Ireland Israel 80 70 Uruguay Chile Average OECD 60 Trinidad & Tobago Korea, Rep. Argentina MongoliaEgypt BrazilPanama 2 50 Malaysia y = -0.15x + 7.41x + 0.49 Costa Rica R2 = 0.90 40 Jordan Mexico Contributors/ labor force (%) JamaicaTunisia Turkey Venezuela Colombia ParaguayAlgeria 30 Iran Sri LankaPhilippinesGuatemala El Salvador Ecuador Honduras 20 Morocco Kenya China Indonesia CameroonNicaragua Bolivia DomenicanPeru Rep. 10 ZambiaIndia 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Structure I. Objectives, Definitions, and Modalities II. Role of MDC Approach Under Main Reform Scenarios III. Conceptual Issues for Investigation I. Objectives, Definition, Modalities Key objectives: • Increase basic and/or supplemental coverage of population against key risks (in particular old age and health) • Do not contribute to, better reduce incentives for informal sector participation (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Staff Papers
    STAFF PAPERS PETER HOLE Chair, Editorial Committee IAN S. MCDONALD Editor and Deputy Chair THOMAS WALTER Assistant Editor Editorial Committee William E. Alexander Paul R. Masson F. Charles Adams Donald J. Mathieson David Burton Guy M. Meredith Peter Isard Ratna Sahay G. Russell Kincaid Subhash M. Thakur Malcolm D. Knight Howell H. Zee Jorge Marquez-Ruarte Among the responsibilities of the International Monetary Fund, as set forth in its Articles of Agreement, is the obligation to "act as a centre for the collection and exchange of information on monetary and financial problems." Staff Papers makes available to a wider audience papers prepared by the members of the Fund staff. The views presented in the papers are those of the authors and are not to be interpreted as necessarily indicating the position of the Executive Board or of the Fund. To facilitate electronic storage and retrieval of bibliographic data, Staff Papers has adopted the subject classification scheme developed by the Journal of Economic Literature. Subscription: US$54.00 a volume or the approximate equivalent in the currencies of most countries. Four numbers constitute a volume. Single copies may be purchased at $18.00. Individual academic rate to full-time professors and students of universities and colleges: $27 a volume. Subscriptions and orders should be sent to: International Monetary Fund Publication Services 700 19th Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20431, U.S.A. Telephone: (202) 623-7430 Telefax: (202) 623-7201 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: http://www.imf.org ©International Monetary Fund. Not for Redistribution INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND STAFF PAPERS Vol.
    [Show full text]