Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect

Procedia Earth and Planetary Science 8 ( 2014 ) 93 – 97

International workshop “Uranium, Environment and Public Health”, UrEnv 2013 Natural Gamma Radiation and Uranium Distribution in Soils and Waters in the Agueda River Basin (-Portugal)

Sánchez-González Sa; Curto Na; Caravantes Pa; García-Sánchez Aa*

a Instituto de Recursos Naturales y Agrobiología, IRNASA-CSIC, Apdo. 257, , Spain.

Abstract

Gamma dose equivalent (0.18 μSv/h) is higher than background of Salamanca province, Guarda district and worldwide average. The concentration of water-soluble U (or bioavailable) in soils regionally distributed with no influence of mining works, ranges from 1 to 137L μg/ with a median of 9 μg/l. The U content in shallow well waters ranges 0.1 – 79.5 μg/L with a median of 0.4 μg/l. In river and stream samples the concentration are lower (median < 0.1 μg/L). The association of U, As and pH in water samples indicates an increase of U and As solubility with increasing pH linked to the formation of uranyl-carbonate and uranyl-arsenate complexes.

© 2014 Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license © 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/). Selection and peer-review under responsibility of the Instituto Politécnico de Castelo Branco. Selection and peer-review under responsibility of the Instituto Politécnico de Castelo Branco

Keywords: Uranium; Waters; Soils; Uranium mining area; Gamma dose equivalent.

1. Introduction

Uranium is a well-known hazardous element because of its radioactivity as well as its toxicity as a heavy metal. It is widely distributed in the earth’s crust, rocks and soils at concentrations1 of about 2–10 mg/kg, although locally can reach several hundred of mg/kg due to anthropogenic activities.

* Corresponding author. Tel.: +34 923 219 606; fax: +34 923 219 609. E-mail address: [email protected]

1878-5220 © 2014 Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/). Selection and peer-review under responsibility of the Instituto Politécnico de Castelo Branco doi: 10.1016/j.proeps.2014.05.019 94 S. Sánchez-González et al. / Procedia Earth and Planetary Science 8 ( 2014 ) 93 – 97

Uranium in the environment originate from natural geochemical processes and anthropogenic activities. The latter include use of nuclear energy, weapons with depleted uranium, coal combustion, production and use of phosphate fertilizers. Especially, uranium mining contaminates the environment by means of abandoned waste containing radioactive material. So, this element is one of the most widespread contaminants in soils and groundwater around to mining areas. Almost all uranium is found in nature as the isotope 238U. It undergoes radioactive decay into a series of 13 radionuclides before reaching the stable 206Pb. This radionuclide emit alpha or beta radiation and some also emit gamma radiation of widely varying energies. Its solubility in waters and soils depends on the pH, redox potential, soil structure and mineral composition of the solid phase, concentration of inorganic compounds, and the type of complexing agents present, such as carbonates, phosphates, vanadates, fluorides, sulphates, silicates, etc. as well as, the quantity and type of organic matter, moisture content and microbial activities2. Sorption of U (VI) onto soil particles is higher at lower pH values and decreases strongly with increasing pH3. The reduction of U (VI) to U (IV) by abiotic and biotic processes, as well as its re-oxidation has received considerable attention because the oxidation state of uranium has a significant effect on its mobility in the natural environment. Under oxidizing environments, U (VI) is the most stable and mobile 2+ oxidation state and exists almost exclusively as uranyl (UO2 ). Sorption onto mineral surfaces is one of the most important means in retarding uranyl mobility. Moreover, the presence of carbonates in the solution decreases strongly the sorption of U (VI) onto soil particles through the formation of carbonate complexes such as UO2 2 (CO3)2 . These negatively charged complexes have a much lower affinity than uranyl and hydroxy-complexes for iron oxhydroxides, at pH > pH pzc. The aim of this work was to study the distribution pattern of U in soils, and surface water of an extensive area where there are several U deposits and extensive outcrops of black shale as the main U anomaly origin. In addition, gamma radiation measurements, uranium mobility, bioavailability and relation to soil properties were studied in order to assess the level of U pollution as well as its environmental risk.

2. Materials and methods

2.1 Study area

This study was carried out in a region, the river Agueda basin (Salamanca province of Spain and Guarda district of Portugal) where there are numerous deposits of uranium, which occur in fracture areas in shale and schist of the pre-ordovician schist-greywacke complex (CEG) that forms part of the paleozoic basement of the Hesperian Massif4. The Saelices, Alameda del Gardón, Gallegos de Agañán, , and are the most important of these deposits. There is generally a clear tectonic control of the mineralization following shears, faults and breccia zones; this fracturation has been assigned an Alpine age5 as well as the associated hydrothermal processes that caused the U mineralization. In addition, there are other smaller U-quartz veins deposits hosted in hercynian granites that are situated in , La , Sobradillo, San Felices de los Gallegos y Bañobarez. The principal ore minerals are pitchblende (UO2) and coffinite [SiO4U(OH)4], accompanied by alteration products such as gummite (uranium oxides), U-phosphates (autunite, torbernite, sabugalite) and U- sulphates (uranopilite, zippeite). Gangue minerals include pyrite and marcasite. The mining activities in Saelices deposit, including static and dynamic acid lixiviation, started in 1960 and finished in 2000, and produced huge amounts of wastes composed of barren rocks (mainly shales, schists and quartz), impoverished ore minerals, and mud rich in sulphates and iron oxides. The restoration of the Saelices mine included geomorphologic remodelling and recovering of the new surface with a layer of powdered arkoses and sandstones to prevent leaching by runoff, as well as addition of topsoil with organic and fertilizers amendments to promote revegetation with grass and other plant species to prevent surface erosion of this area. Rain water is stored in several ponds located at different topographical levels to control its low pH due to weathering of the abundant pyrite, as well as the discharge to the Águeda river, avoiding its radioactive contamination. The climate of this region is continental, with Atlantic influence; annual average precipitation is around 500 mm and very irregular and usually absent in July and August, so, during the dry season, the hydric balance is clearly S. Sánchez-González et al. / Procedia Earth and Planetary Science 8 ( 2014 ) 93 – 97 95 negative, which propitiates the drying of ponds at Saelices mine site, avoiding water discharge into the Agueda river.

2.2 Sampling and analysis

Water samples from rivers, streams, pounds, and surface wells regionally distributed, and topsoil around these wells were collected during March and April 2012. The soil samples were dried at 50 °C, mixed and homogenized and sieved through a 2-mm screen. The < 2 mm fraction was used to determine the main soil properties: pH was determined potentiometrically in a soil paste saturated with water; organic matter was determined by dichromate oxidation using the Tiurin method and %N by Kjeldahl method. Cation exchange capacity (CEC) was determined according to the ammonium acetate method, and particle size distribution (sand, silt, and clay) was analyzed by the pipette method. Water-soluble U in soil samples was measured as follows: Soil and Milli-Q water were mixed in 1:10 proportion and the mixed solution was shaken for 24 h using a rotary shaker. The solution was centrifuged at 3000 rpm; and then the supernatant was collected and filtered using 0.45 μm filters. The U concentration in the supernatant solutions, as well as, in water samples was determined using the ICP-MS method. Gross α activity in water samples was determined by α-spectrometry. Dose equivalent measurements (gamma radiation) were taken in situ at 1 m height with a Geiger counter (Lamse, Mod. Eris1R; Madrid, Spain), along the entire Águeda river basin, the measurement points were 552. The SPSS v.12.0 software package was used for all statistical analyses.

3. Results and discussion

The median of the gamma dose equivalent (Fig.1) is very higher than the reported background of the Salamanca6 province 0.11 μSv/h, Guarda7 district 0.12 μSv/h or the worldwide average8 0.07 μSv/h, and range 0.06 – 1.50 μSv/h, with a median value of 0.18 μSv/h. The data varies mainly depending on the contents of U in the soil which in turn depends on the lithology of the soil parent material: on the CEG lower unity (Agadones area) the range is 0.06 – 0.36 μSv/h and the median 0.16 μSv/h; CEG upper unity (Argañan area) range 0.10 – 1.50 μSv/h median 0.28 μSv/h; granites 0.09 – 0.40 μSv/h median 0.20 μSv/h. Also it should be noted that some important anomalies are linked to some mining exploration works such as at Alameda del Gardón or Villar de la Yegua (3-5 μSv/h) and Carpio de Azaba (6.5 μSv/h) . It is not the case of the Saelices mine since has been restored and covered with a thick layer of barren shale and arkosic materials. In addition, it was observed that some local gamma radiation anomalies are related to regional alpine fracturation sites and outcropping areas of black shales.

Fig. 1. Map of gamma radiation dose equivalent in the Agueda river basin (circle indicate points with elevate gamma radiation > 1 μSv/h). 96 S. Sánchez-González et al. / Procedia Earth and Planetary Science 8 ( 2014 ) 93 – 97

The radiological situation of the basin is not of immediate concern, except at the mining exploration sites with elevated external hazard index: annual effective dose 6.13 mSv/year versus world average 0.06 mSv/year, and a lifetime cancer risk of 284 x 10-4 versus world average 2.8 x 10-4. Therefore, environmental remediation at these sites should be planned and implemented. In river and stream samples the U concentration are lower (Fig. 2-A) range <0.02 to 10.30 μg/L, median 0.05 μg/L. Near 10% of water samples shows U concentrations > 8 μg/L (guideline limit for drinking water established by German Environment Protection Agency). Most samples are located in areas of black shale outcropping. In water samples of Agueda River downstream of the Saelices mine the uranium concentration is higher than upstream. A model for the mobilization of uranium in these waters is proposed. This involves the percolation of oxic waters through the fractured rocks, leading to the oxidation of pyrite and arsenopyrite and the precipitation of iron oxyhydroxides. This in turn leads to the dissolution of the primary pitchblende and, subsequently, to release of U (VI) species in water. These U (VI) species are retained by iron hydroxides and then can be mobilized by carbonate complexation. The U contents in shallow wells range from 0.1 to 79.5 μg/L with a median of 0.4 μg/L (Fig.2-B). However, normal U worldwide concentrations in natural waters1,9 do not exceed 0.4 μg/L, being those samples closest to the mining areas which have higher contents about 10-79.5 μg/l in similar form to other uraniferous areas10. Moreover, in a deep borehole hydraulically connected to mineralized quartz-veins (Gallegos de Argañan) the U content is 284 μg/L. The concentration of water-soluble U (or bioavailable) in soils regionally distributed in the Agueda river basin with no influence of mining works, ranges between 1 and 137 μg/L with a median of 9 μg/L, (Fig. 2-C). Except for the organic matter content and iron oxide content, there was no single soil parameter significantly explaining the water-soluble U in soils.

Fig. 2. Boxplot distribution of U in water (A, rivers and streams; B, Shallow wells) and soil (C, soils) samples.

The high U concentrations in Saelices mining ponds (25- 50 mg/L) indicate that these bodies of water constitute extreme environments. Even in areas influenced by mining activities, the U concentration11 is usually about 3.5 mg/L, and the concentration limit established by the U Mill Tailings Remediation Action (UMTRA) in the USA is 0.5 mg/l. The uranium contamination can be caused by U lixiviation from the mining area. The main U source might be mining spoils of shale and schist, and waste mud of the acid leaching pads, with U contents up to 200 mg/kg. The gross α (>100 mBq/L ) and β (>1000 mBq/L) activities12 in these waters originate from 238U and its daughter 226Ra, which is more mobile than uranium in supergene processes causing a relative enrichment of this element in water. In spite of the probable fractionation of 226Ra during weathering process there are a good correlation between α total activity in water samples (range 55-1800 mBq/L) and uranium concentration. S. Sánchez-González et al. / Procedia Earth and Planetary Science 8 ( 2014 ) 93 – 97 97

The PCA (Principal components analysis) of waters samples shows an association of U, As and pH (Fig. 3), which can indicate an increase of U solubility with increasing pH, linked to the formation of highly soluble negatively charged carbonate complexes, since the maximum adsorption13 of U on FeOOH occurs at pH around 5.5. Moreover, uranium might show similarity = with the arsenic mobilization since AsO4H is released in solution14 when the pH is > 5. In addition, the formation of uranyl-arsenate complexes has been proved by spectroscopy15; so, theses complexes can propitiate the transport of both elements together16.

Fig. 3. Factorial plane: PC1 (54,9% of total variability and PC3 (8.5% of total variability.

Acknowledgements

Acknowledgments: This work was funded by the EU co-financed by FEDER and POCTEP Program 2007-2013 (Ref. CE: 0410_AGUEDA_3_E). The software SPSS and ESRI-ArcGIS were used in the statistical and spatial analysis.

References

1. Rogers JJ, Adams JA. Uranium: abundance in natural waters. In K.H. Wedepohl, editors. Handbook of Geochemistry. Springer. New York; 1978. 2. Gavrilescu M, Pavel LV, Cretescu I. Characterization and remediation of soils contaminated with uranium. J Hazar Mat 32009; 16 : 475–510. 3. Echevarria G, Sheppard MI, Morel JL. Effect of pH in the sorption of uranium in soils. Environ Radioactivity 2001; 53: 257-264. 4. Arribas A. Sobre el origen de las mineralizaciones españolas de uranio en rocas metasedementarias. Bol Geol Min 1987; 48: 705-711. 5. Both RA, Arribas A, Saint-André B The origin of breccia hosted uranium deposits in carbonaceous metasediments in the Iberian Peninsula. Econ Geol 1994; 9: 584-601. 6. Quindos Poncela LS, Fernández PL, Gómez Arozamena J, Sainz C, Fernández JA. Natural gamma radiation map (MARNA) and indoor radon levels in Spain. Environ Intern 2004, 29: 1091– 1096. 7. Amaral EM, Alves JG, Carreiro JV. Doses to the portuguese population due to natural gamma radiation. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 1992. 45: 541-543. 8. UNSCEAR. Report. Sources and effects of ionizing radiation. New York; , 2000. 9. Palmer MR, Edmond JM. Uranium in river water. Geoch Cosmoch Acta 1993.5/7: 4947-4955. 10. Neiva AMR, Carvalho PCS, Antunes IMHR, Silva MMVG, Santos ACT, Cabral Pinto MMS, Cunha PP. Contaminated water, stream sediments and soils close to the abandoned Pinhal do Souto uranium mine, central Portugal. J Geochem Explor 2014; 136: 102-117. 11. Desssouki TCE, Hudson JJ, Neal BR, Bogard MJ. The effects of phosphorus additions on the sedimentation of contaminants in a uranium mine pit-lake. Water Research 2005; 39: 3055–3061. 12. Gutierrez-Villanueva JL. Radon concentration in air, soil and water in a granitic area: instrumental developments and measurements. PhD Thesis. University of Valladolid, Spain; 2008. 13. Vandenhove HC. Gil-García A., RigolM, Vidal. New best estimates for radionuclide solid–liquid distribution coefficients in soils. Part 2. Naturally occurring radionuclides. J Environ Radioactivity 2009; 100: 697–703. 14. Garcia-Sanchez A, Alvarez-Ayuso E, Rodriguez F. Sorption of As (V) by some oxyhydroxides and clays minerals. Application to its immobilization in two polluted mining soils. Clay Miner 2002; 37: 187– 194. 15. Gezahegne WA, Hennig C, Tsushima S, Planer-Friedrich B, Scheinost AC, Merkel BJ. EXAFS and DFT investigations of uranyl arsenate complexes in aqueous solution. Environ Sci Technol 2012; 46: 2228-2233.

16. Nair S, Merkel BJ. Transport of uranyl and arsenate in the presence of SiO2, Al2O3, TiO2 and FeOOH. Goldschmidt 2012 Conference Abstract; 2012.