DOCSLIB.ORG

The Mystery of Redemption

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Mystery of Redemption THE MYSTERY OF REDEMPTION Vladimir Moss © Vladimir Moss, 2009 INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................3 1. THE “JURIDICAL THEORY” .............................................................................8 2. THE MEANING OF “JUSTIFICATION” ..........................................................19 3. THE SACRIFICE FOR SIN................................................................................26 4. THE PRAYER IN THE GARDEN .....................................................................38 5. GETHSEMANE OR GOLGOTHA?...................................................................50 6. THE THEORY OF “MORAL MONISM”..........................................................57 7. ORIGINAL SIN...................................................................................................65 CONCLUSION: LOVE AND JUSTICE.................................................................75 APPENDIX I: “THE NEW THEOLOGIANS”.......................................................86 APPENDIX II: THE RUSSIAN SCHOOL OF “MORAL MONISM” ..................92 APPENDIX III: A LIFE OF ARCHBISHOP THEOPHAN OF POLTAVA .......102 2 INTRODUCTION Of mercy and judgement shall I sing unto Thee, O Lord. Psalm 100.1. He wiped out our debt, by paying for us a most admirable and precious ransom. We are all made free through the blood of the Son, which pleads for us to the Father. St. John of Damascus, First Word on the Divine Images, 21. The mystery of our redemption by Christ through His Holy Crucifixion and Resurrection is the very heart of the Orthodox Christian Gospel. With the dogma of the Holy Trinity it is the most important of all the dogmas. Therefore any attempt to explain or reinterpret it by a senior hierarch of the Orthodox Church is an event of great importance requiring the closest attention. Two works by Metropolitan Anthony (Khrapovitsky) of Kiev, The Dogma of Redemption and the Catechism, have been a subject of controversy in the Orthodox Church for nearly a century. The controversy consists in the fact that in these works Metropolitan Anthony attacks the Orthodox Christian teaching on redemption as expounded by Metropolitan Philaret of Moscow (+1867), labeling it “scholastic”. The purpose of this little book is to defend Metropolitan Philaret’s teaching as being indeed the traditional teaching of the Orthodox Church by an examination and refutation of Metropolitan Anthony’s thesis, especially as it is reiterated in a document recently written by the Bishops of the “Holy Orthodox Church in North America” (HOCNA), and entitled “Resolution of the Sacred Synod of the True Orthodox Church of Greece concerning The Dogma of Redemption by Metropolitan Anthony Khrapovitsky”.1 One of the earliest critics of Metropolitan Anthony was New Hieromartyr Archbishop Victor of Vyatka. He noted already in 1912 that the “new theology” of Metropolitan Anthony and his pupil, Metropolitan (and future “Patriarch”) Sergius (Stragorodsky)2 “would shake the Church”. And he saw in Metropolitan Sergius’ disastrous “Declaration” of 1927 a direct result of his teaching on salvation – which teaching was openly praised by Metropolitan Anthony in The Dogma of Redemption.3 Hieromartyr Victor was not the only critic of Metropolitan Anthony’s theory in the Catacomb Church. According to Hieromartyr Paul Borotinsky, the Petrograd Hieromartyrs Bishop Demetrius of Gdov and Fr. Theodore Andreyev were also critical of it.4 1 http://deltard.org/hocna/defense.htm 2 Patriarch Sergius, The Orthodox Teaching on Salvation, second edition, Kazan, 1898; http://www.pravbeseda.ru/library/index.php?page=boo&id=91 (in Russian). 3 Hieromartyr Victor, “The New Theologians”, The Church, 1912; reprinted in the series “On the New Heresies”, Moscow: Orthodox Action, № 1 (11), 2000 (in Russian). 4 M.B. Danilushkin (ed.), A History of the Russian Church from the Restoration of the Patriarchate to the Present Day, vol. I, St. Petersburg, 1997, pp. 989-990 (in Russian). 3 Nor was criticism of Metropolitan Anthony’s work confined to the Russian Church. Thus immediately after the publication of The Dogma of Redemption in Serbia in 19265, Protopriest Milosh Parenta wrote in the Serbian Church’s official organ: “The tragedy of Metropolitan Anthony is amazing! A pillar of the faith in soul, a great Orthodox in his heart, a strict fulfiller and preserver of Church discipline to the smallest details. But when he approaches a scientific-theological examination and explanation of the dogmas, then he either insufficiently comprehends them, or he cannot avoid the temptation of, and enthusiasm for, modernism. The explanation of the dogma of redemption offered by the author in this work openly destroys the teaching on this truth faithfully preserved by the Orthodox Church, and with it the Christian Religion itself, because the truth of the redemption together with the truth of Christ’s incarnation is its base and essence. However, it is necessary to recognize that it is very difficult to analyse this work of the author, because in it there are often no definite and clear concepts, although there are many extended speeches which hide the concepts or say nothing, and because in part there are no logical connections in it, nor any strictly scientific exposition, nor systematic unity.”6 Metropolitan Anthony’s Catechism, which expressed the same theology as The Dogma of Redemption in a more concise form, was at first accepted by the Synod of the Russian Orthodox Church Outside Russia (ROCOR) in 1926 as a substitute for Metropolitan Philaret of Moscow’s Catechism in schools. The Synod did not call Metropolitan Philaret’s Catechism heretical, simply saying that Metropolitan Anthony’s was “shorter and more convenient for assimilation”. And Metropolitan Anthony himself did not ask for Metropolitan Philaret’s Catechism to be removed from use in favour of his own, writing only (in a report to the Synod dated April 9/22, 1926): “In my foreword to An Attempt at an Orthodox Christian Catechism I wrote: ‘In publishing my work as material, I in no way wished that it should completely overshadow the Catechism of [Metropolitan] Philaret in schools, but I have nothing against the idea that this or that teacher of the Law of God should sometimes, in his interpretation of the dogmas and commandments, use my thoughts and references to Holy Scripture and Holy Tradition, thereby filling in the gaps in the textbook catechism with regard to various religious questions, of which very many have arisen in the time since the death of the author’”.7 5 It was originally published in Russian in Bogoslovsky Vestnik 8-9 (1917), pp. 155-167, 285-315, and in book form in the same year in Sergiev-Posad. All quotations from it in this work are from the English translation by Holy Transfiguration Monastery, Boston, published by Monastery Press, Canada in 1972. 6 Parenta, Herald of the Serbian Orthodox Patriarchate, 1926, N II (1/14 June), pp. 168-174 (10-34) (in Serbian). 7 Protocols of the Hierarchical Synod of the Russian Orthodox Church Abroad, 9/22 April, 1926 (in Russian). 4 All this sounds innocent and cautious enough. And yet the fact is, as Metropolitan Anthony made clear on many occasions, the real motive for the writing of his Catechism and Dogma of Redemption was that he considered Metropolitan Philaret’s Catechism “scholastic” and heretical, being identical with the Roman Catholic teaching on redemption of Anselm and Aquinas. Thus in his letters to the Russian Athonite theologian, Hieromonk Theophan (later Hieroschemamonk Theodosius of Karoulia), a firm opponent of Metropolitan Anthony’s thesis, he expressed fundamental disagreement “with the juridical theory of Anselm and Aquinas, which was completely accepted by P[eter] Moghila and Metropolitan Philaret”8 And again he wrote: “We must not quickly return to Peter Moghila, Philaret and Macarius: they will remain subjects for historians”9 And again: “Apparently you together with your namesake [Archbishop Theophan of Poltava, the main opponent of Metropolitan Anthony’s teaching in ROCOR Synod] have fallen into spiritual deception”. 10 So it is clear that, for Metropolitan Anthony, as for his opponents, this was a fundamental matter of doctrine. Either Metropolitan Philaret’s Catechism was heretical and Metropolitan Anthony’s was Orthodox, or Metropolitan Anthony’s was heretical and Metropolitan Philaret’s was Orthodox. And whoever was wrong was “in spiritual deception”. But the consequences of “victory” for either side would have been unthinkable; it would have meant condemning as a heretic either the greatest Russian hierarch of the 19th century or, in many people’s opinion, the greatest Russian hierarch of the 20th century, and would quite simply have torn the Russian Church Abroad apart at a time when it was fighting for its life against communism, sergianism and sophianism. So it is not surprising that both sides exhibited signs of trying to “cool” the conflict. On the one hand, Metropolitan Anthony’s Catechism did not replace that of Metropolitan Philaret, and the ROCOR Synod under Metropolitan Anastasy refused to review the question again. And on the other, Metropolitan Anthony’s chief opponent, Archbishop Theophan departed to live a hermit’s life in France… But the conflict has resurfaced in the 1990s, both in Russia and in America, particularly in the writings of HOCNA. Now the HOCNA hierarchs refrain from directly calling any of the major players in this controversy a heretic. At the same time,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dositheos Notaras, the Patriarch of Jerusalem (1669-1707), Confronts the Challenges of Modernity
    IN SEARCH OF A CONFESSIONAL IDENTITY: DOSITHEOS NOTARAS, THE PATRIARCH OF JERUSALEM (1669-1707), CONFRONTS THE CHALLENGES OF MODERNITY A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY Christopher George Rene IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Adviser Theofanis G. Stavrou SEPTEMBER 2020 © Christopher G Rene, September 2020 i Acknowledgements Without the steadfast support of my teachers, family and friends this dissertation would not have been possible, and I am pleased to have the opportunity to express my deep debt of gratitude and thank them all. I would like to thank the members of my dissertation committee, who together guided me through to the completion of this dissertation. My adviser Professor Theofanis G. Stavrou provided a resourceful outlet by helping me navigate through administrative channels and stay on course academically. Moreover, he fostered an inviting space for parrhesia with vigorous dialogue and intellectual tenacity on the ideas of identity, modernity, and the role of Patriarch Dositheos. It was in fact Professor Stavrou who many years ago at a Slavic conference broached the idea of an Orthodox Commonwealth that inspired other academics and myself to pursue the topic. Professor Carla Phillips impressed upon me the significance of daily life among the people of Europe during the early modern period (1450-1800). As Professor Phillips’ teaching assistant for a number of years, I witnessed lectures that animated the historical narrative and inspired students to question their own unique sense of historical continuity and discontinuities. Thank you, Professor Phillips, for such a pedagogical example.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mystery of Redemption
    THE MYSTERY OF REDEMPTION Vladimir Moss © Vladimir Moss, 2007 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................3 1. THE “JURIDICAL THEORY” .........................................................................8 2. THE MEANING OF “JUSTIFICATION” ...................................................19 3. THE SACRIFICE FOR SIN ............................................................................26 4. THE PRAYER IN THE GARDEN.................................................................38 5. GETHSEMANE OR GOLGOTHA? .............................................................50 6. THE THEORY OF “MORAL MONISM”....................................................57 7. ORIGINAL SIN................................................................................................65 CONCLUSION: LOVE AND JUSTICE ...........................................................76 APPENDIX: A LIFE OF ARCHBISHOP THEOPHAN OF POLTAVA .....87 2 INTRODUCTION Of mercy and judgement shall I sing unto Thee, O Lord. Psalm 100.1. He wiped out our debt, by paying for us a most admirable and precious ransom. We are all made free through the blood of the Son, which pleads for us to the Father. St. John of Damascus, First Word on the Divine Images, 21. The mystery of our redemption by Christ through His Holy Crucifixion and Resurrection is the very heart of the Orthodox Christian Gospel. With the dogma of the Holy Trinity it is the most important of all the dogmas. Therefore any attempt to explain or
    [Show full text]
  • THE GOLDEN CHAIN the Lives of Archbishop Theophan of Poltava, Archbishop John of San Francisco, Archbishop Andrew of Rockland and Metropolitan Philaret of New York
    THE GOLDEN CHAIN The Lives of Archbishop Theophan of Poltava, Archbishop John of San Francisco, Archbishop Andrew of Rockland and Metropolitan Philaret of New York Vladimir Moss © Copyright: Vladimir Moss, 2010 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................3 I. ARCHBISHOP THEOPHAN OF POLTAVA..................................................4 Early Years.............................................................................................................4 At the Theological Academy ..................................................................................6 Rasputin...............................................................................................................10 Bishop of Yamburg...............................................................................................12 Bishop of Astrakhan.............................................................................................20 Archbishop of Poltava ..........................................................................................23 The Revolution.....................................................................................................28 Exile in Serbia......................................................................................................31 In Bulgaria...........................................................................................................35 Dogmatic Disputes ..............................................................................................42
    [Show full text]
  • The Golden Chain
    THE GOLDEN CHAIN The Lives of Archbishop Theophan of Poltava, Archbishop John of San Francisco, Archbishop Joasaph of Canada, Archbishop Andrew of Rockland and Metropolitan Philaret of New York Vladimir Moss © Copyright: Vladimir Moss, 2010 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................3 I. ARCHBISHOP THEOPHAN OF POLTAVA..................................................4 Early Years.............................................................................................................4 At the Theological Academy ..................................................................................6 Rasputin...............................................................................................................10 Bishop of Yamburg...............................................................................................12 Bishop of Astrakhan.............................................................................................20 Archbishop of Poltava ..........................................................................................23 The Revolution.....................................................................................................28 Exile in Serbia......................................................................................................31 In Bulgaria...........................................................................................................35 Dogmatic Disputes ..............................................................................................42
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of Liturgical and Theatrical Practices in Byzantium
    ABSTRACT Title of Document: THE ARTIFICE OF ETERNITY: A STUDY OF LITURGICAL AND THEATRICAL PRACTICES IN BYZANTIUM Andrew Walker White, Doctor of Philosophy, 2006 Directed By: Professor Franklin J. Hildy, Theatre and Professor Emeritus George P. Majeska, History This study attempts to fill a substantial gap in our knowledge of theatre history by focusing on the Orthodox ritual aesthetic and its relationship with traditional theatrical practice in the Eastern Roman Empire – also known as Byzantium. Through a review of spatial practices, performance aesthetics and musical practice, and culminating in a case study of the Medieval Office of the Three Children in the Fiery Furnace, this dissertation attempts to demonstrate how the Orthodox Church responded to the theatre, and determine whether the theatre influenced the development of its ritual aesthetic. Because of the well-documented rapprochement between church and theatre in the west, this study also tries to determine whether there was a similar reconciliation in the Orthodox east. From the Early Byzantine period onward, conduct of the Orthodox Liturgy was rooted in a ritual aesthetic that avoided direct imitation or representation. This Orthodox ritual aesthetic influenced every aspect of the Liturgy, from iconography to chant to liturgical dance, and involved a rejection of practices that, in the Church’s view, would draw too much attention to the material or artistic aspects of ritual. Theatrical modes of representation were consistently avoided and condemned as anathema. Even in the Middle Ages, when Catholics began to imitate Jesus at the altar and perform representations of biblical episodes using actors, realistic settings and special effects, Orthodox hierarchs continued to reject theatrical modes of performance.
    [Show full text]
  • UNF: the Byzantine Saint: a Bibliography [Halsall]
    Paul Halsall The Byzantine Saint: A Bibliography (2005) Introduction This thematic bibliography should be read in conjunction with Alice-Mary Talbot's Survey of Translations of Byzantine Saints' Lives [at Dumbarton Oaks], which lists all available Byzantine saint's lives translated into any modern western language. This bibliography was compiled for my dissertation and for a class I taught on the history of sainthood in 2005. It is therefore now out of date but may still prove of some interest. Contents I: What is a Saint? o Sainthood: General o Hagiography: General o Canonization: General o Byzantine Sainthood: General o Byzantine Hagiography o Byzantine Sainthood: Saint-Making/Canonization o Locating Information on Saints o Internet Bibliographies II: Biography III: The Novel IV: The Pagan Holy Man V: Martyrs: Pagan and Christian Sources VI: The Life of Anthony VII: Early Monasticism I: Egypt and Pachomius VIII: Early Monasticism II: Palestine IX: Early Monasticism III: Syria X: The Christian Holy Man in Society: Ascetics XI: The Christian Holy Man in Society II: Bishops XII: Women Saints I: The Early Church XIII: Women Saints II: The Byzantine Period XIV: Thaumaturgy (Wonder-Working), Miracles and Healing XV: From Hagiography to Legend XVI: The Metaphrastic Effort XVII: Middle Byzantine Sainthood XVIII: Later Byzantine Sainthood XIX: Byzantine Monasticism and Sainthood XX: Post-Byzantine Greek Saints XXI: The Theotokos XXII: Saints in Art XXIII: Saints in Liturgy XXIV: Slavic Saints XXV: Major Collections I: What is a Saint? Sainthood: General Brown, Peter R. L. The Cult of the Saints. Chicago: University of Chicago Press,1981. [Cf. Averil.
    [Show full text]
  • 14 February 2020 REV DR CHRISTIAAN W KAPPES
    14 February 2020 REV DR CHRISTIAAN W KAPPES CURRICULUM VITAE 3605 Perrysville Avenue Office Phone: 412-321-8383 Pittsburgh, PA 15214 Fax: 412-321-9936 Email: [email protected] Institutional Webpage: http://www.bcs.edu/ Professional Publications: https://sscms.academia.edu/ChristiaanWKappes EDUCATION 2018. PHD: Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, GR (Summa cum Laude) Dissertation Title: The Theology of the Divine Essence and Energies in George- Gennadios Scholarios Director: Very Rev. Dr. Elpidoforos Lambriniadis, Metropolitan of Bursa 2012. DOCTORATE: Pontifical Athenaeum of Sant’Anselmo de Urbe (cum Laude) SLD (Doctoratus Sacrae Liturgiae) Dissertation Title: The Missa Normativa of 1967: Its History and Principles as applied to the Liturgy of the Mass. Director: Dom Cassian Folsom, OSB MASTERS OF PHILOSOPHY (Licentiate): Section – Thomism: Pontifical University of St. Thomas Aquinas in Urbe (Summa cum Laude) MASTERS OF THEOLOGY (Licentiate): Pontifical University of Sant’Anselmo de Urbe (Magna cum Laude) BACHELORS IN THEOLOGY: Pontifical University of St. Thomas Aquinas in Urbe (Angelicum) STB (Sacrae Theologiae Baccalaureus), Magna cum Laude BACHELORS IN CLASSICAL STUDIES: Seton Hall University, 1998 BA, Magna cum Laude PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE 2017–Present. Adjunct Professor of Liturgy, Christology, and Philosophy, St. Vincent’s College and Seminary, Latrobe, PA 2015–Present. Academic Dean and Professor of Dogmatics and Patristics, SS. Cyril and Methodius Byzantine Catholic Seminary, Pittsburgh, PA 2014–2015. Full Professor of Liturgy and Patristics, SS. Cyril and Methodius Byzantine 2 Catholic Seminary, Pittsburgh, PA 2014–2019. Assistant Dean of Men, SS. Cyril and Methodius Byzantine Catholic Seminary, Pittsburgh, PA 2011–2013. Adjunct, Professor of Theology and Philosophy, Universidad de Los Hemisferios, Quito, Ecuador DIPLOMAS 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Churches, Catholic Churches, Protestant Churches, Mosques, the Choral Synagogue and the Buddhist Datsan
    Chairman of the Committee for Tourism Development in Saint Petersburg Е. V. Pankevich Glad to welcome guests of Saint Petersburg! Saint Petersburg has always been the center of spiritual life of rep- resentatives of various confessions that co-exist in peace and harmony. Th at is testifi ed by proximity of diff erent confessions temples situated sometimes in the same street. Today in the city there are about three hundred active cult build- ings among which can be found orthodox churches, catholic churches, protestant churches, mosques, the Choral Synagogue and the Buddhist datsan. Having passed the test of time, many of them are still function- ing. In Saint Petersburg monasteries there are venerated shrines and bur- ials of famous persons. From year to year a multitude of tourists comes to Saint Petersburg to worship unique relics. I am sure that such aspect of Saint Petersburg will be interesting to be discovered by many guests of the city. Th e routes presented in this brochure are unique and they will help you to discover the city from a new aspect. Saint Petersburg is a marvelous city in which you can fully observe interlacing and co-existence of a multitude of cultures, and all that is open for you – our guests. Welcome to Saint Petersburg! Head of the Department for Relations with Religious Associations of the Administration of the Governor of St. Petersburg V. G. Ivanov Th is edition is a unique gift presented by the confessions of our city to the next birthday of St. Petersburg. In addition to information about the main temples of reli- gions that are traditionally present on the banks of the Neva, it provides an overview of interesting excursion programs, including the “Temples of Nevsky Avenue”.
    [Show full text]
  • University of London the POLITICS OF
    University of London London School of Economics and Political Science THE POLITICS OF RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE IN FIFTEENTH-CENTURY EUROPE THROUGH AN EAST-WEST ENCOUNTER: A RE-INTERPRETATION John VIII Palaiologos, Emperor of the Romans (1392-1448) The eldest of the six children of Manuel II Palaiologos and Helena Dragas in The Chapel of the Magi: Benozzo Gozzoli’s Frescoes in the Palazzo Medici-Piccardi, Florence Edited by Cristina Acidini Luchinat, Thames & Hudson, London and New York, 1994 The Processionof the Magi, The South Wall, represented as Magus Balthazar KYRIAKI TORTOPIDOU-DERIEUX Interdisciplinary Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Supervisors: Professors Stephan Feuchtwang and Patrick Humphreys, London Department of Social Psychology Declaration I certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the PhD degree of the London School of Economics and Political Science is solely my own work other than where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others. The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without my prior written consent. I warrant that this authorisation does not, to the best of my belief, infringe the rights of any third party. I declare that my thesis consists of c. 92,000 words. I can confirm that my thesis was copy-edited for conventions of language, spelling and grammar by Gerrie van Noord. London, 30 September 2015 Abstract My thesis works as an experiment, or rather a series of experiments, in methods of thinking about historical material.
    [Show full text]
  • City Research Online
    City Research Online City, University of London Institutional Repository Citation: Antonopoulos, Spyridon (2014). The Life and Works of Manuel Chrysaphes the Lampadarios, and the Figure of Composer in Late Byzantium. (Unpublished Doctoral thesis, City, University of London) This is the accepted version of the paper. This version of the publication may differ from the final published version. Permanent repository link: https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/17439/ Link to published version: Copyright: City Research Online aims to make research outputs of City, University of London available to a wider audience. Copyright and Moral Rights remain with the author(s) and/or copyright holders. URLs from City Research Online may be freely distributed and linked to. Reuse: Copies of full items can be used for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge. Provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way. City Research Online: http://openaccess.city.ac.uk/ [email protected] The Life and Works of Manuel Chrysaphes the Lampadarios, and the Figure of Composer in Late Byzantium: Volume 1 Spyridon Antonopoulos PhD Thesis City University London Department of Music October 2013 Table of Contents Volume I: Table of Contents 2 List of Figures 3 Acknowledgments 5 Declaration 7 Abstract 8 Abbreviations 9 A Note on the Musical Transcriptions 10 Chapter 1: Introduction
    [Show full text]