Arxiv:2107.04662V1 [Math.GN]
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
ON LINEAR CONTINUOUS OPERATORS BETWEEN DISTINGUISHED SPACES Cp(X) JERZY KA¸KOL AND ARKADY LEIDERMAN Abstract. As proved in [16], for a Tychonoff space X, a locally convex space Cp(X) is distinguished if and only if X is a ∆-space. If there exists a linear con- tinuous surjective mapping T : Cp(X) → Cp(Y ) and Cp(X) is distinguished, then Cp(Y ) also is distinguished [17]. Firstly, in this paper we explore the following question: Under which con- ditions the operator T : Cp(X) → Cp(Y ) above is open? Secondly, we devote a special attention to concrete distinguished spaces Cp([1, α]), where α is a countable ordinal number. A complete characterization of all Y which admit a linear continuous surjective mapping T : Cp([1, α]) → Cp(Y ) is given. We also observe that for every countable ordinal α all closed linear subspaces of Cp([1, α]) are distinguished, thereby answering an open question posed in [17]. Using some properties of ∆-spaces we prove that a linear continuous sur- jection T : Cp(X) → Ck(X)w, where Ck(X)w denotes the Banach space C(X) endowed with its weak topology, does not exist for every infinite metrizable compact C-space X (in particular, for every infinite compact X ⊂ Rn). 1. Introduction ′ A locally convex space (lcs) E is called distinguished if its strong dual Eβ = (E′, β(E′, E)) is a barrelled space. A. Grothendieck [11] proved that a metrizable ′ lcs is distinguished if and only if Eβ is bornological. Also, if all bounded subsets of ′ the strong dual Eβ of a metrizable lcs are metrizable, then E is distinguished [11]. Recall that the strong topology β on E′ is the topology of uniform convergence on bounded subsets of E. A subset A ⊂ E is bounded if is absorbed by each neighbourhood of zero in E. We refer the reader to the survey article of K. D. Bierstedt and J. Bonet [7], where many classes of distinguished Fr´echet lcs are arXiv:2107.04662v1 [math.GN] 9 Jul 2021 presented (reflexive spaces, Montel spaces, nuclear spaces, Schwartz spaces, etc). Date: July 13, 2021. 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 54C35; Secondary 46A03, 46A20. Key words and phrases. Distinguished locally convex space, linear continuous operator, ∆- space, countable ordinal. The first named author is supported by the GACRˇ project 20-22230L and RVO: 67985840. The authors thank J.C. Ferrando for providing a short argument in Remark 2.5 (iii) and W.B. Johnson and T. Kania for a very helpful advice and discussion about Theorem 3.2. 1 2 JERZYKA¸KOLANDARKADYLEIDERMAN In this paper we continue the study of distinguished lcs in the frame of spaces Cp(X) and Ck(X) (developed earlier in [8], [9], [10], [16], [17]). By Cp(X) and Ck(X) we mean the spaces of all real-valued continuous functions on a Tychonoff space X endowed with the topology of pointwise convergence τp and the compact- open topology τk, respectively. Recall that for a vector space E the finest locally convex topology ξ of E is generated by the family of all absolutely convex and absorbing subsets of E which form a base of neighbourhoods of zero for the topology ξ. We denote by N N the infinite countable discrete space. It is obvious that Cp(N) = R is the only distinguished Fr´echet lcs E for which its strong dual carries the finest locally N ′ convex topology. In fact, Cp( )β is isomorphic to ϕ, i.e. the ℵ0-dimensional vector space with the finest locally convex topology. On the other hand, one can characterize distinguished lcs Cp(X) as follows: Cp(X) is distinguished if and ′ only if Cp(X)β carries the finest locally convex topology, see [8], [9]. 1 We proved that Cp(X) is distinguished if and only if X is a ∆-space [16]. The class ∆ of ∆-spaces naturally extends the class of ∆-sets of reals. Note that the original definition of a ∆-set A ⊂ R is due to G. Reed and E. van Douwen [28]. A topological space X is said to be a ∆-space if for every decreasing sequence {Dn : n ∈ ω} of subsets of X with empty intersection, there is a decreasing sequence {Vn : n ∈ ω} consisting of open subsets of X, also with empty intersec- tion, and such that Dn ⊂ Vn for every n ∈ ω [16]. Quite recently a range of new facts about ∆-spaces has been obtained by the authors. We proved that every Cech-completeˇ (in particular, compact) X ∈ ∆ is scattered [16]. Moreover, every countably compact space is scattered [17]. Class ∆ contains all separable compact spaces of the Isbell-Mr´owka type, while there are compact scattered spaces X∈ / ∆, for example, ordinal space [0,ω1] [16]. In fact, every compact ∆-space must have countable tightness [17]. Although the property of being a ∆-space is not inherited by continuous images, the class ∆ does preserve closed continuous images [16]. Furthermore, a countable union of compact ∆-spaces is also a ∆-space; in particular, σ-product of any family consisting of scattered Eberlein compact spaces is a ∆-space [17]. The next result is a matter of high importance to us. Theorem 1.1. [17] The class ∆ is invariant under the relation of l-dominance, i.e. if Cp(X) is distinguished and there exists a linear continuous surjective mapping T : Cp(X) → Cp(Y ), then Cp(Y ) also is distinguished. The focus in this paper is on the following question: Under which conditions the operator T : Cp(X) → Cp(Y ) above is open? We notice that in general there are plenty of linear continuous non-open surjections between Cp(X)-spaces. 1We should mention that independently and simultaneously an analogous description of distinguished Cp-spaces (but formulated in different terms) appeared in [10]. ON LINEAR CONTINUOUS OPERATORS BETWEEN DISTINGUISHED SPACES Cp(X) 3 Proposition 1.2. [25] Let X be a Tychonoff space and h : X → X be a con- tinuous mapping such that the orbit of at least one point is infinite. Then the mapping T : Cp(X) → Cp(X) defined by T f(x) = λf(x)+ f(h(x)) is a linear continuous non-open surjection for each λ with |λ| > 1. In Section 2 we prove the following open mapping theorem for spaces Cp(X) over ∆-spaces X. Theorem 1.3. Let X be a ∆-space. Consider the following assertions for a linear continuous surjection T : Cp(X) → Cp(Y ). (1) Cp(X) admits a base U of absolutely convex neighbourhoods of zero such that cl T (U) ⊂ 2T (U) for each U ∈ U. (2) T is an open mapping. (3) Cp(X) admits a base U of absolutely convex closed neighbourhoods of zero such that T (U) is closed for each U ∈ U. Then (3) ⇒ (2) ⇔ (1). Corollary 1.4. If X and Y are ∆-spaces and T : Cp(X) → Cp(Y ) is a linear continuous bijection, then T is an isomorphism if and only if any condition from Theorem 1.3 holds. It is easy to see that in above Proposition 1.2, X might be selected as a ∆- space for which a continuous linear non-open surjection T : Cp(X) → Cp(X) exists but T lacks condition (3) of Theorem 1.3. This happens, for example, if Cp(X) is barrelled. Clearly, there exist Banach spaces E and F and linear continuous surjections T : E → F with non-closed T (S) for the closed unit ball S ⊂ E; injective linear continuous maps T : E → F such that T (S) is closed were studied under the name semi-embedding, see [26]. We stress that our proof of Theorem 1.3 rely inevitably on the assumption that X is a ∆-space. Recall that the unit segment [0, 1] is not a ∆-space. A challeng- ing problem of whether a non-open continuous linear surjection T : Cp[0, 1] → Cp[0, 1] satisfying condition (3) of Theorem 1.3 exists, remains unsolved. We devote a special attention to lcs Cp(X) for some concrete ∆-spaces X. For any ordinal number α let [1,α] denote the ordered compact space consisting of all ordinals γ ≤ α. The symbols ω and ω1 stand for the first infinite and the first uncountable ordinal numbers, respectively. S. Gul’ko showed that for any pair of infinite countable ordinals α and β, the spaces Cp([1,α]) and Cp([1, β]) are uniformly homeomorphic, see [12]. Theorem 3.2 shows however that if α ≤ β<ω1 and the spaces Cp([1,α]) and Cp([1, β]) are not linearly isomorphic, then Cp([1, β]) is not a continuous linear image of Cp([1,α]). Thus our results are related to the research area of linear topological classification of function spaces originated long time ago in the pioneering work of C. Bessaga and A. Pe lczy´nski [6]. A complete linear topological classification of the spaces Cp([1,α]) has been obtained independently in [13] (for all α) and [3] (for countable α). 4 JERZYKA¸KOLANDARKADYLEIDERMAN We also observe that for every countable ordinal compact space X = [1,α] the space Cp(X) is hereditarily distinguished in the following sense: all closed linear subspaces of Cp(X) are distinguished (Theorem 3.4). This result answers in the affirmative Problem 2.18 posed in [17]. The argument used in the proof of Theorem 1.3 applies to provide a ”lin- ear version” of M. Krupski and W. Marciszewski results from [20], [22] about the non-existence of a homeomorphism between spaces Cp(X) and Ck(Y )w over certain compact spaces X and Y , where Ck(Y )w denotes the Banach space C(Y ) endowed with its weak topology w.