Long-Range Interpretative Plan, Nez Perce National Historical Park

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Long-Range Interpretative Plan, Nez Perce National Historical Park LONG-RANGE INTERPRETIVE PLAN NEZ PERCE NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK LONG-RANGE INTERPRETIVE PLAN NEZ PERCE NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK prepared by National Park Service Nez Perce National Historical Park Department of Interpretive Planning Harpers Ferry Center TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION . .1 PARK PURPOSE . .2 PARK SIGNIFICANCE . .3 PRIMARY INTERPRETIVE THEMES . .4 THE VISITORS . .9 ISSUES, GIVENS, CONSTRAINTS . .10 VISITOR EXPERIENCE GOALS/ACTION . .11 PARKWIDEVISITOREXPERIENCEGOALSANDACTIONS . .11 IDAHOUNIT . .16 Spalding . .16 White Bird Battlefield . .20 Heart of the Monster/McBeth House . .22 Ant and Yellowjacket . .23 Buffalo Eddy . .24 Camas Prairie . .25 Canoe Camp . .27 Clearwater Battlefield . .28 Cottonwood Skirmishes . .29 Coyote’s Fishnet . .30 Craig Donation Land Claim . .31 Confluence Overlook . .32 Fort Lapwai Officers’ Quarters & Northern Idaho Indian Agency . .33 Hasotino Village Site . .34 Lapwai Mission . .35 Lenore . .36 Lewis and Clark Long Camp/Asa Smith Mission . .37 Lolo Trail and Lolo Pass . .38 Looking Glass Camp . .40 Musselshell Meadow . .42 Pierce Coourthouse . .43 Saint Joseph’s Mission . .44 Tolo Lake . .45 Weippe Prairie . .46 Weiss Rockshelter . .47 MONTANAUNIT . .48 Big Hole National Battlefield . .48 Bear Paw Battlefield . .51 Camas Meadows Battle Sites . .54 Canyon Creek . .55 OREGON/WASHINGTONUNIT . .57 Dug Bar . .57 Joseph Canyon Viewpoint . .58 Lostine Campsite . .59 Old Chief Joseph Gravesite . .61 Nez Perce (Nespelem) Campsites . .62 Nez Perce Cemetery . .63 PLANNING TEAM . .65 APPENDIX A-Recommendations Summary . .67 APPENDIX B-Media Accessibility Guidelines . .73 INTRODUCTION In 1995 the National Park Service issued a com- sary to begin implementing the interpretive and pletely revised and updated interpretive planning visitor experience actions prescribed in the chapter of the Service's Interpretation and General Management Plan. Visitor Services Guideline (NPS-6). This The park’s interpretation and education program revised guideline outlined the components of the will be driven by the park’s significance, it’s Comprehensive Interpretive Plan-a park's strate- resources and primary interpretive themes. The gic planning document for interpretation and Comprehensive Interpretive Plan defines ways visitor services. Every park has been encouraged the park can give each visitor the opportunity to to update their interpretive planning documents experience the park’s resources and the values using this guideline. A key component of the they represent, and foster a personal stewardship Comprehensive Interpretive Plan process is the ethic. Interpretation and education will encour- Long-Range Interpretive Plan. age dialogue and accept the visitor’s right to The Long-Range Interpretive Plan examines a have their own individual point of view. Factual park's purposes and significant resources in information presented will be current, accurate, order to establish the park's primary interpretive based on the best available scholarship and sci- themes and visitor experience goals. The plan ence. Interpretation and education will also analyzes the park's current interpretive facilities reach out to park neighbors and community and outlines any changes necessary to facilitate leaders, to stimulate discussions about the park appropriate visitor experiences. The Long- and its values in local, regional, and national Range Interpretive Plan is a concept plan that forums. In addition, interpretive and educational lays the groundwork for subsequent media plan- services will help park employees better under- ning and design. The actions recommended in stand the park’s history, resources, processes, the plan are those that the park can reasonably and visitors. be expected to accomplish in 7-10 years, the pro- jected life span of the Long-Range Interpretive Plan. Nez Perce National Historical Park completed its General Management Plan in 1997. The Long-Range Interpretive Plan will provide the additional strategic and tactical planning neces- Nez Perce National Historical Park Long-Range Interpretive Plan 1 PARK PURPOSE Park purpose is the reason or reasons for which On the basis of provisions in the enabling legis- a park area was established. Purpose statements lation, the 1997 General Management Plan for are important to planning because they are basic Nez Perce National Historical Park and Big Hole to all other assumptions about the park and the National Battlefield identified these park pur- ways in which it should be used and managed. poses: Nez Perce National Historical Park was estab- lFacilitate protection and offer interpretation lished as a unit of the national park system on of Nez Perce sites in Idaho, Oregon, May 15, 1965, by Public Law 89-19. The law Washington, Montana, and Wyoming that states that the park was created to "facilitate pro- have exceptional value in commemorating tection and provide interpretation of sites in the the history of the United States. Nez Perce Country of Idaho that have excep- lPreserve and protect tangible resources that tional value in commemorating the history of the document the history of the Nez Perce peo- Nation." A total of 24 sites were designated part ples and the significant role of the Nez Perce of the historical park as a result of the 1965 leg- in North American history. islation. On October 30, 1992, Public Law 102- 576 allowed sites to be designated in Oregon, lInterpret the culture and history of the Nez Washington, Montana, and Wyoming, and spec- Perce peoples and promote documentation to ified 14 additional sites in Idaho, Oregon, enhance that interpretation. Washington, and Montana to be included in the park. 2 Nez Perce National Historical Park Long-Range Interpretive Plan PARK SIGNIFICANCE The significance of a park is summarized in lNez Perce National Historical Park offers a statements that capture the essence of the park's unique opportunity for visitors to gain an importance to our natural and cultural heritage. understanding of present-day Nez Perce cul- Significance statements are not the same as an ture within and outside the Nez Perce home- inventory of significant resources. While the land and to learn about important events of resource inventory is a basis on which signifi- the past. cance is determined, the significance statements lPast and present Nez Perce culture were describe the importance or distinctiveness of the shaped by the geography and the rich and var- aggregate of resources in a park. Knowing the ied resources of the Nez Perce homeland. park's significance helps set resource protection priorities, identify primary park interpretive lThe park includes parts of the Lewis and themes, and develop desirable visitor experi- Clark National Historic Trail and the Lolo ences. The 1997 General Management Plan for Trail, both of which were used by other cul- Nez Perce National Historical Park and Big Hole tures. The Nez Perce country, Nez Perce National Battlefield identified these significance National Historical Park sites, and other statements for Nez Perce National Historical Native American cultures overlap but also Park: differ in many ways. lThe park preserves a continuum of at least lThe park contains burial sites and sacred 11,000 years of Nez Perce culture. Its archeo- sites; it is also a focal point for current Nez logical record, museum collection, cultural Perce culture and allows for the continued landscapes, and structures are of national sig- traditional use of resources. The park honors nificance. The park contains historical and the rights retained in the 1855 and 1863 cultural landmarks that are of legendary sig- treaties and will fully apply all applicable nificance to the Nez Perce people. The Nez laws, executive orders, policies, and treaties Perce (Nee-Me-Poo) National Historic Trail related to the protection of cultural properties commemorates a significant event in the his- and sacred sites. tory of the Nez Perce people. Nez Perce National Historical Park Long-Range Interpretive Plan 3 PRIMARY INTERPRETIVE THEMES Primary interpretive themes are based on a includes some who are not blood relatives, was park's purposes, significance, and primary and is the basis for traditional Nez Perce society. resources. These themes are often described as lThe Nez Perce homeland-its land forms, its the key stories or concepts that visitors should resources-shaped every aspect of Nez Perce understand after visiting the park. The themes culture; it affected where people lived, their provide the foundation for all interpretive pro- diet, their economy, their recreational pur- grams and media developed for the park. They suits, and their spiritual well-being. do not include everything the.
Recommended publications
  • Oregon Historic Trails Report Book (1998)
    i ,' o () (\ ô OnBcox HrsroRrc Tnans Rpponr ô o o o. o o o o (--) -,J arJ-- ö o {" , ã. |¡ t I o t o I I r- L L L L L (- Presented by the Oregon Trails Coordinating Council L , May,I998 U (- Compiled by Karen Bassett, Jim Renner, and Joyce White. Copyright @ 1998 Oregon Trails Coordinating Council Salem, Oregon All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Printed in the United States of America. Oregon Historic Trails Report Table of Contents Executive summary 1 Project history 3 Introduction to Oregon's Historic Trails 7 Oregon's National Historic Trails 11 Lewis and Clark National Historic Trail I3 Oregon National Historic Trail. 27 Applegate National Historic Trail .41 Nez Perce National Historic Trail .63 Oregon's Historic Trails 75 Klamath Trail, 19th Century 17 Jedediah Smith Route, 1828 81 Nathaniel Wyeth Route, t83211834 99 Benjamin Bonneville Route, 1 833/1 834 .. 115 Ewing Young Route, 1834/1837 .. t29 V/hitman Mission Route, 184l-1847 . .. t4t Upper Columbia River Route, 1841-1851 .. 167 John Fremont Route, 1843 .. 183 Meek Cutoff, 1845 .. 199 Cutoff to the Barlow Road, 1848-1884 217 Free Emigrant Road, 1853 225 Santiam Wagon Road, 1865-1939 233 General recommendations . 241 Product development guidelines 243 Acknowledgements 241 Lewis & Clark OREGON National Historic Trail, 1804-1806 I I t . .....¡.. ,r la RivaÌ ï L (t ¡ ...--."f Pðiräldton r,i " 'f Route description I (_-- tt |".
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of Ecoregions of Idaho
    1 0 . C o l u m b i a P l a t e a u 1 3 . C e n t r a l B a s i n a n d R a n g e Ecoregion 10 is an arid grassland and sagebrush steppe that is surrounded by moister, predominantly forested, mountainous ecoregions. It is Ecoregion 13 is internally-drained and composed of north-trending, fault-block ranges and intervening, drier basins. It is vast and includes parts underlain by thick basalt. In the east, where precipitation is greater, deep loess soils have been extensively cultivated for wheat. of Nevada, Utah, California, and Idaho. In Idaho, sagebrush grassland, saltbush–greasewood, mountain brush, and woodland occur; forests are absent unlike in the cooler, wetter, more rugged Ecoregion 19. Grazing is widespread. Cropland is less common than in Ecoregions 12 and 80. Ecoregions of Idaho The unforested hills and plateaus of the Dissected Loess Uplands ecoregion are cut by the canyons of Ecoregion 10l and are disjunct. 10f Pure grasslands dominate lower elevations. Mountain brush grows on higher, moister sites. Grazing and farming have eliminated The arid Shadscale-Dominated Saline Basins ecoregion is nearly flat, internally-drained, and has light-colored alkaline soils that are Ecoregions denote areas of general similarity in ecosystems and in the type, quality, and America into 15 ecological regions. Level II divides the continent into 52 regions Literature Cited: much of the original plant cover. Nevertheless, Ecoregion 10f is not as suited to farming as Ecoregions 10h and 10j because it has thinner soils.
    [Show full text]
  • BIG HOLE National Battlefield
    BIG HOLE National Battlefield Historical Research Management Plan & Bibliography of the ERCE WAR, 1877 F 737 .B48H35 November 1967 Historical Research Management Plan BIG HOLE NATI ONAL for .BATILEFIELD LI BRP..RY BIG HOLE Na tional Battlefield & Bibliog raphy of the N E Z PERCE WAR, 1877 By AUBREY L. HAINES DIVISION OF HISTORY Office of Archeology and Historic Preservatio.n November 1967 U.S. Department of the Interior NATI ONAL PARK SERVICE HISTORICAL RESEARCH MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR BIG HOLE NATIONAL BATTLEFIELD November 1968 Recommended Superintendent Date Reviewed Division of History Date Approved Chief, Office of Archeology Date and Historic Preservation i TABLE OF CONTENTS Historical Research Management Plan Approval Sheet I. The Park Story and Purpose . • • • 1 A. The Main His torical Theme ••••••• 1 B. Sub sidiary Historical Theme • • • • • 1 1 c. Relationship of Historical Themes to Natural History and Anthropology • • • • • • • • 12 D. Statement of Historical Significance •• 14 E. Reasons for Establishment of the Park • • • • • 15 II. Historical Resources of the Battlefield 1 7 A. Tangible Resources • • • • 17 1. Sites and Remains 1 7 a. Those Related to the Main Park Theme • • . 1 7 b. Those Related to Subsidiary Themes • 25 2. Historic Structures 27 B. Intangible Resources • 2 7 c. Other Resources 2 8 III.Status of Research •• 2 9 A. Research Accomplished 29 H. Research in Progress • • • • • 3o c. Cooperation with Non-Service Institutions 36 IV. Research Needs ••••••••••••••••• 37 A. Site Identification and Evaluation Studies 37 H. General Background Studies and Survey Histories 40 c. Studies for Interpretive Development • • • • • 4 1 D. Development Studies • • • • • • • • • 4 1 E.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Senate of the United States. Letter from the Secretary of The
    University of Oklahoma College of Law University of Oklahoma College of Law Digital Commons American Indian and Alaskan Native Documents in the Congressional Serial Set: 1817-1899 1-27-1894 In the Senate of the United States. Letter from the Secretary of the Interior, transmitting an agreement with the Nez Perce Tribe of Indians in Idaho, together with the report of the commissioner appointed to negotiate with said Indians, and a draft of a bill to confirm and ratify said agreement. Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.ou.edu/indianserialset Part of the Indian and Aboriginal Law Commons Recommended Citation S. Exec. Doc. No. 31, 53rd Cong., 2nd Sess. (1894) This Senate Executive Document is brought to you for free and open access by University of Oklahoma College of Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in American Indian and Alaskan Native Documents in the Congressional Serial Set: 1817-1899 by an authorized administrator of University of Oklahoma College of Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SEN.A.TE. Ex.Doc~ 53D 00NGH,ESS7 } 2d Session. { No. 31. IN THE SENATE. OF THE UNITED ..STATES. ·1 E i 1 TE R FROM THE SECRETARY OF T·H-E INTERIOR, TRANSMITTING An agree1nent with the Nez Perce tribe of Indians in Idaho, together 'With the report of the commissioner appointed to negotiate with said Indians~ a,nd a draft of a bill to conjirui cind ratify said agreement. JANUARY 29, 1894:.-Referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs and ordered to be printed.
    [Show full text]
  • Idaho Division Index
    Northern Pacific Idaho Division Camas Prairie Railroad 1st Subdivision-Paradise-Spokane 2nd Subdivision-Spokane-Pasco 3rd Subdivision-Pasco-Yakima 4th Subdivision-Gibbon-Parker (via Sunnyside) 5th Subdivision-Hauser-Coeur d’Alene (Ft. Sherman Branch) 6th Subdivision-Marshall-Lewiston (Palouse & Lewiston Branch) 7th Subdivision-Pullman Jct.-Genesee (Genesee Branch) 7th Subdivision-Belmont (remnant of former Farmington Branch) 8th Subdivision-Cheney-Adrian (Washington Central Branch) 8th Subdivision-Davenport-Eleanor (Seattle Branch) 8th Subdivision-Connell-Adco (Connell Northern Branch) 8th Subdivision-Bassett Jct.-Schrag (Ritzville Branch) 9th Subdivision-Pasco-Attalia (Walla Walla Branch)(Wallula) 9th Subdivision-Dayton-Pendleton Branch Connection (Walla Walla Branch) (Dayton) 9th Subdivision-Tracy Jct.-Tracy (Walla Walla Branch)(Tracy Branch) 10th Subdivision-Pleasant View-Eureka (Euereka Branch) 11th Subdivision- Attalia-Pendleton (Pendleton Branch) 11th Subdivision-Athena-Smeltz (Athena Branch) 12th Subdivision-Snake River Jct.-Riparia (Snake River Branch) 13th Subdivision- Toppenish-White Swan (Simcoe Branch) CP1st Subdivision-Stites-Arrow (Clearwater Short Line) CP 2nd Subdivision-Grangeville-Lewiston (Lapwai Branch) CP 3rd Subdivision-Lewiston-Riparia (Line to Riparia) CP 4th Subdivision-Orofino-Headquarters (Orofino Branch) SP&S 3rd Subdivision-Pasco-Snake River Jct. only Note: 8th Subdivision on 2 files. WC&SB is one file, CN&RB is the other. All track charts were scanned at 150 dpi, and combined subdivisions are as recorded by Northern Pacific. “Crooked” plans scanned are as on the original sheet. The scanning process put each page square with the scanner. Blotches were on the original plans. The copies scanned were probably copied from blueprints. .
    [Show full text]
  • Nez Perce (Nee-Me-Poo) National Historic Trail Progress Report
    United States Department of Agriculture Nez Perce (Nee-Me-Poo) National Historic Trail Progress Report Summer 2019 Administrator ’s Corner At the Nez Perce (Nee-Me-Poo) National Historic Trail (NPNHT) program, we work through partnerships that seek to create communication and collaboration across jurisdictional and cultural boundaries. Our ethic of working together reinforces community bonds, strengthens our Trail social fabric, and fosters community prosperity. By building stronger relationships and reaching out to underserved communities, who may have not historically had a voice in the management, interpretation of the Trail, we can more effectively steward our trail through honoring all the communities we serve. U.S. Forest Service photo, U.S. Roger Peterson Forest Service Volunteer labor isn’t perfect sometimes. Construction projects can take Sandra Broncheau-McFarland, speaking to longer than necessary, but there are so many intangible benefits of the Chief Joseph Trail Riders. volunteering- the friendships, the cross-cultural learning, and the life changes it inspires in volunteers who hopefully shift how they live, travel, and give in the future. Learning how to serve and teaching others the rest of our lives by how we live is the biggest impact. Volunteering is simply the act of giving your time for free and so much more. In an always on and interconnected world, one of the hardest things to find is a place to unwind. Our brains and our bodies would like us to take things a lot slower,” says Victoria Ward, author of “The Bucket List: Places to find Peace and Quiet.” This is the perfect time to stop and appreciate the amazing things happening around you.
    [Show full text]
  • Idaho County School Survey Report PSLLC
    CULTURAL RESOURCE SURVEY HISTORIC RURAL SCHOOLS OF IDAHO COUNTY Prepared for IDAHO COUNTY HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION GRANGEVILLE, IDAHO By PRESERVATION SOLUTIONS LLC September 1, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements ..................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 2 Preface: What is a Cultural Resource Survey? ........................................................................... 3 Methodology Survey Objectives ........................................................................................................... 4 Scope of Work ................................................................................................................. 7 Survey Findings Dates of Construction .................................................................................................... 12 Functional Property Types ............................................................................................. 13 Building Forms .............................................................................................................. 13 Architectural Styles ........................................................................................................ 19 Historic Contexts Idaho County: A Development Overview: 1860s to 1950s ............................................. 24 Education in Idaho County: 1860s to
    [Show full text]
  • Final Environmental Impact Statement Nez Perce National Historical Park and Big Hole National Battlefield
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU Final Environmental Impact Statements (ID) Idaho 1997 Final Environmental Impact Statement Nez Perce National Historical Park and Big Hole National Battlefield United States, Department of the Interior, National Park Service Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/idaho_finalimpact Part of the Environmental Sciences Commons Recommended Citation United States, Department of the Interior, National Park Service, "Final Environmental Impact Statement Nez Perce National Historical Park and Big Hole National Battlefield" (1997). Final Environmental Impact Statements (ID). Paper 22. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/idaho_finalimpact/22 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the Idaho at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Final Environmental Impact Statements (ID) by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DIt>51-S-0S FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT NEZ PERCE NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK AND BIG HOLE NATIONAL BATTLEFIELD JULY 1997 AsorIN AND OKANOGAN C OUNTlES, W ASHINGTON W ALLOWA C Ol1l'olY, OREGON NEZ PERCE, IDAHO, L EWIS, CLEARWATER, AND ClARK C OUNTTES, IDAHO BWNE, YELLOWSTONE, AND BEAVERHEAD COUNTIES, M OM'AN'" INTRODUCTION This Fitla / Enuironmental lmpact Statement for Nez P~ rc e National Historical Park and Big Hole National Battlefield is an abbreviated document. It is important to understand that this Final Environmental Impact Statement must be read in conjunction with the previously published. Draf t General Management Plan/Enuironmental lmpact Statement. A notice of availability of the Draft General Management PlanlEnuironmental Impact Statement was published in the Federal Register, Vol. 61, No. 199, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Sacred Trails
    Sacred Trails “The Land unites us with [our] across time, keeping our culture alive…… We live in the place our ancestors called home before the great pyramids of Egypt were built.” Nez Perce Tribal Executive Committee First Encounter of Horse Nation Native Americans have always believed that animal creatures were part of the living community. When Native Americans first encountered the horse they called them Horse Nation and they found an ally, inspiration and a tool that would transform their world. By the 1800’s Natives had used the horse nation as survival and sustaining their culture. Native Americans honored the horse and invited the horse into their spiritual lives. The horse continued to have a close relationship with the Native Americans. Horse Dominates North America In the 1500’s Spanish Conquistadors used the horse as a powerful weapon to take over the new lands in North America. Some of the horse were captured or ran away and the Native American tamed, trained and blessed the horses into their everyday lives. The horses move across the entire North American continent and become a powerful tool against invaders. By the 1700’s many native tribes had their own horse nation. The horse nation strengthened the native tribes by becoming an integral part of their community and spiritual life. 1 Sacred Trails The Walla Walla Council of 1855 The Walla Walla Council was held on the banks of Mill Creek a tributary of the Walla Walla River. Governor Stevens the Governor of Washington and the Superintendent of Indian Affairs devoted much of his time to setting up councils between the tribes of Washington Territory.
    [Show full text]
  • Tolo Lake Nez Perce National Historical Park
    National Park Service Nez Perce National Historical Park U.S. Department of the Interior Nez Perce National Historical Park Idaho, Montana, Oregon Washington Tolo Lake Nestled among the wheat fi elds of the Camas Prairie is Tolo Lake, Idaho. While locals often visit this small, quiet pond to fi sh or watch migratory birds, the lake is best understood as a time capsule. If you could peer deep into the sediments of this ancient pond you could see the bones of Columbia Mammoths who died struggling to extricate themselves from this muddy hole. For the Nez Perce or Nimiipuu, this place has deep meanings - the lake served as a backdrop to the tragic events that triggered the confl ict of 1877. Tepahlewam Tepahlewam is a Nimiipuu word that means Split This demand stung—the reservation was a tenth Rocks, referring to Rocky Canyon west of the lake. of that guaranteed by the Treaty of 1855, now Since time immemorial Nimiipuu gathered to dig reduced by the “Thief Treaty” of 1863, which the camas, race horses, play games and socialize. In Wallowa Nez Perce had never signed. June 1877, the Wallowa Nez Perce paused here, a day’s journey from their new home. Emotions ran high. Defying their leaders, a few angry young warriors slipped away from White They were sorrowfully complying with General Bird’s camp to avenge past crimes committed O.O. Howard’s demand: leave their traditional against their people. From June 13 to 14, fi fteen Wallowa Valley home in northeast Oregon to re- settlers were slain; fear gripped the Salmon River settle on the Nez Perce Reservation near Lapwai.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
    NFS Form 10-900 OMB No. 10024-001 (Revised Feb. 1993) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations of eligibility for individual properties or districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NFS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer to complete all items. 1. Name of Property historic name Elfers. Jurden Henry. Barn and Field other names/site number IHSI #49-17934: SITS #10-IH-527 2. Location street & number John Day Creek N/A not for publication City or town Lucile X vicinity state Idaho code ID county Idaho code 049 zip code 83530 3. State/Federal Agency Certification_____ As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this _X nomination _request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property _X_meets _does not meet the National Register criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant _X_nationally _statewide _locally.
    [Show full text]
  • Chronology of a Conflict Code: EL1: SS Directions: Use the Attached Timeline to Review the Historical Information
    Name: __________________________________________ Date: __________________ Chronology Of A Conflict Code: EL1: SS Directions: Use the attached timeline to review the historical information. What happened when? And to whom? Place the letter (A-R) of the event in the event column below and the date that the event occurred in the date column. A. The Thief Treaty is negotiated. B. War of Independence. C. Fort Lapwai, a military post, is established in response to reports that 18,690 whites are illegally camping on the Nez Perce reservation. D. Old Joseph dies and is buried in the Wallowa Valley; Young Joseph becomes Chief. E. Introduction of the horse. F. Henry Spalding establishes a Christian mission at Lapwai, Idaho. G. Gold is discovered in the Clearwater Mountains. H. The Walla Walla Treaty is signed by some Nez Perces. I. Lewis and Clark meet the Nez Perce near present day Weippe, Idaho. J. Joseph travels to Washington, D.C. to plead for his band's return to their homeland. K. Joseph's people are moved to Quawpaw Reservation, Kansas Territory. L. Sixty settlers build cabins in the Wallowa Valley; Chief Joseph formally protests their presence. Government agents repeatedly ask Joseph to settle his band. M. White surveyors arrive in Wallowa Valley. N. Nez Perce first experienced diseases from the Anglo or Euro American culture. O. Exiled Nez Perce bands return to the northwest either going to Lapwai or Colville. Joseph's people are moved to Colville Reservation in Nespelem, Washington. P. Councils between U.S. agents and the Nez Perce end with an order that all Nez Perce move to the Lapwai Reservation.
    [Show full text]