Contest ID 1018 2012 NJCL Ancient Geography Test

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Contest ID 1018 2012 NJCL Ancient Geography Test Contest ID 1018 2012 NJCL Ancient Geography Test Questions 1-15 refer to the map of Greece in your packet. Identify the location. 1. Athens A. 16 B. 25 C. 4 D. 32 2. Mytilene A. 39 B. 40 C. 36 D. 35 3. Sea of Marmara A. B B. G C. J D. F 4. Sparta A. 28 B. 29 C. 12 D. 11 5. Tenedos A. a B. e C. c D. f 6. Corinth A. 26 B. 33 C. 14 D. 21 7. Epidauros A. 23 B. 28 C. 25 D. 31 8. Delphi A. 12 B. 27 C. 8 D. 1 9. Dodona A. 10 B. 8 C. 2 D. 36 10. Olympia A. 9 B. 20 C. 27 D. 26 11. Delos A. l B. g C. p D. r 12. Thebes A. 20 B. 6 C. 13 D. 37 13. Mt. Olympus A. iii B. vi C. i D. v 14. Mt. Dicte A. vii B. iii C. vi D. iv 15. Amphipolis A. 3 B. 5 C. 4 D. 2 Questions 16-25 refer to the map of Italy in your packet. Identify the location. 16. Rome A. 9 B. 14 C. 15 D. 16 17. Sardinia A. f B. a C. d D. b 18. Brundisium A. 26 B. 25 C. 27 D. 19 19. Ravenna A. 13 B. 7 C. 12 D. 8 20. Cumae A. 23 B. 20 C. 27 D. 17 21. Mediolanum A. 6 B. 4 C. 1 D. 8 22. Agrigentum A. 32 B. 33 C. 30 D. 34 23. Syracuse A. 31 B. 32 C. 33 D. 34 24. Rubicon River A. G B. F C. H D. J 25. Luca A. 9 B. 10 C. 7 D. 4 Questions 26-35 refer to the map of the Roman Empire in your packet. Identify the location. 26. Adriatic Sea A. A B. B C. C D. E 27. Caledonia A. 1 B. 4 C. 2 D. 47 28. Lusitania A. 27 B. 28 C. 29 D. 30 29. Mauretania A. 23 B. 24 C. 25 D. 26 30. Bithynia A. 40 B. 42 C. 13 D. 11 31. Dalmatia A. 8 B. 9 C. 36 D. 35 32. Gallia Narbonensis A. 30 B. 31 C. 32 D. 33 33. Noricum A. 7 B. 6 C. 9 D. 5 34. Pannonia Inferior A. 9 B. 8 C. 35 D. 36 35. Which of these was Rome’s first province outside of the Italian peninsula? A. 46 B. 33 C. 45 D. 35 2012 NJCL Ancient Geography, Page 1 For questions 36-45, match the ancient place name to the modern place name or vice versa. 36. ancient Hibernia = modern _________ A. Switzerland B. Luxembourg C. Netherlands D. Ireland 37. modern Lisbon = ancient _________ A. Olisipo B. Lampsacus C. Larissa D. Puteoli 38. modern Paris = ancient _________ A. Padua B. Lutetia C. Paestum D. Aquileia 39. ancient Ister River = modern _________ A. Guadalquivir B. Loire C. Seine D. Danube 40. modern Marsala = ancient _________ A. Massalia B. Numantia C. Mursa D. Lilybaeum 41. modern Split = ancient _________ A. Aspalathos B. Scupi C. Thugga D. Philadelphia 42. ancient Augusta Treverorum = modern _________ A. Augst B. Trier C. Turin D. Augsburg 43. ancient Hispalis = modern _________ A. Cordoba B. Barcelona C. Seville D. Valencia 44. ancient Halicarnassus = modern _________ A. Baalbek B. Istanbul C. Harran D. Bodrum 45. modern Zaragoza = ancient _________ A. Serdica B. Segusio C. Caesaraugusta D. Circesium For questions 46-100, select the best answer to each question. There are no maps to consult for these. 46. What was the port of Rome? A. Ostia B. Antium C. Stabiae D. Rhegium 47. What river runs through Rome? A. Po B. Tiber C. Arno D. Ticinus 48. Which of these was NOT on the Athenian Acropolis? A. Erechtheum B. Temple of Nike C. Propylaea D. Pantheon 49. In what part of Rome would one find the Temple of Mars Ultor? A. Forum of Nerva B. Forum of Caesar C. Forum of Augustus D. Subura 50. Magna Graecia refers to… A. Greek colonies in southern Italy C. the entire Greek sphere of influence B. mainland Greece D. the areas conquered by Alexander the Great 51. Which of these was farthest south? A. Tarentum B. Rhegium C. Croton D. Brundisium 52. The Forum Romanum could be accessed by what road? A. Via Sacra B. Via Nova C. Both D. Neither 53. Where was the Theater of Balbus? A. Forum Romanum B. Janiculum Hill C. Campus Martius D. Aventine Hill 54. What was the ancient name of the Black Sea? A. Pontus Euxinus B. Mare Atrum C. Mare Internum D. Sinus Arabicus 55. Which of the following was NOT part of Italy? A. Gallia Cisalpina B. Calabria C. Apulia D. Pannonia Superior 56. Where was the original destination of the Via Appia? A. Brundisum B. Capua C. Naples D. Tarentum 57. The Long Walls connected what two cities? A. Athens and Piraeus B. Rome and Ostia C. Croton and Sybaris D. Mycenae and Tiryns 2012 NJCL Ancient Geography, Page 2 58. What island is the site of Paphos? A. Chios B. Crete C. Cyprus D. Euboea 59. Which of these was the largest? A. Basilica Aemilia C. Temple of Jupiter Optimus Maximus B. Basilica of Constantine D. Temple of Venus and Rome 60. Which of these cities was closest to the Anio River? A. Mediolanum B. Roma C. Tarentum D. Ravenna 61. Which of these cities could be found in Liguria? A. Genava B. Verona C. Genua D. Aquileia 62. What region contained Baiae, Cumae, and Herculaneum? A. Umbria B. Lucania C. Etruria D. Campania 63. Which of these was built farthest from the rest? A. Temple of Antoninus and Faustina C. Flavian Amphitheater B. Arch of Constantine D. Colossus of Nero 64. In what city was a wondrous tomb built for Mausolus and Artemisia II? A. Rhodes B. Ephesus C. Halicarnassus D. Miletus 65. What area of Athens housed public buildings and hosted public business? A. Forum B. Agora C. Kerameikos D. Acropolis 66. What island was located in the harbor of the city of Syracuse? A. Aegates B. Aeolia C. Lipari D. Ortygia 67. The Via Aurelia connected Rome to which of these cities? A. Aternum B. Florentia C. Pisae D. Rhegium 68. Which of these names does NOT refer to the same city as the others? A. Istanbul B. Ilium C. Constantinople D. Byzantium 69. The tomb of Hadrian can be found closest to what bridge? A. Pons Cestius B. Pons Aelius C. Pons Fabricius D. Pons Aemilius 70. Which of these landmarks had a temple to Poseidon? A. Cape Sounion B. Cape Palinuro C. Misenum D. Mt. Athos 71. Which of these was NOT a place name for part of modern Turkey? A. Paphlagonia B. Cappadocia C. Phocis D. Galatia 72. Which of the following emperors did NOT have his own imperial forum? A. Marcus Aurelius B. Trajan C. Vespasian D. Augustus 73. Sarmizegethusa was the capital of what province? A. Syria B. Cyrenaica C. Moesia D. Dacia 74. In what part of Rome would one find Trajan’s Column? A. Forum Romanum B. Forum Ulpium C. Forum Boarium D. Campus Martius 75. Where in Athens would one find a cemetery? A. Ustrina B. Plaka C. Kerameikos D. Areopagus 76. Which of these is NOT in the Cyclades? A. Seriphos B. Melos C. Paros D. Thasos 77. Which of these could one find on Tiber Island? A. Temple of Aesculapius C. Imperial Palace of Commodus B. Prison for war captives D. Oracle of Apollo 78.A theater for which god sits at the base of the Acropolis? A. Zeus B. Apollo C. Dionysus D. Hermes 79. Which of these was farthest north? A. Temple of Jupiter Stator B. Ara Pacis C. Forum Holitorium D. Baths of Titus 80. Which of these mountains is on an island? A. Vesuvius B. Ida C. Pelion D. Olympus 2012 NJCL Ancient Geography, Page 3 81. The Eurotas River runs through what Greek region? A. Boeotia B. Thessaly C. Laconia D. Messenia 82. Modern Vienna was known to the Romans as… A. Valentia B. Vindobona C. Vienna D. Volubilis 83. Which of the following was farthest west? A. Leptis Magna B. Carthage C. Cyrene D. Cirta 84. Which of these was farthest from the coast of Spain? A. Bilbilis B. Gades C. Tarraco D. Saguntum 85. Which of these rivers is NOT located primarily south of the Pyrenees? A. Iberus B. Baetis C. Tagus D. Garumna 86. Which of these rivers is NOT in Asia Minor? A. Hebrus B. Issus C. Halys D. Eurymedon 87. Which of the following was closest to Londinium? A. Eboracum B. Deva C. Camulodunum D. Aquae Sulis 88. Which of the following was located on the Peloponnesus? A. Tanagra B. Tegea C. Gortyna D. Naupactus 89. What bridge would one take to leave Rome on the Via Flaminia? A. Pons Fabricius B. Pons Sublicius C. Pons Aemilius D. Pons Mulvius 90. Which of these names does NOT refer to the same city as the others? A. Gadara B. Gadeira C. Cadiz D. Gades 91. Which of these is NOT in the Dodecanese? A. Kos B. Karpathos C. Kythera D. Rhodes 92. Which of the Seven Hills of Rome is southernmost? A. Aventine B. Esquiline C. Caelian D. Quirinal 93. To which body of water did the Via Salaria connect? A. Tyrrhenian Sea B. Gulf of Tarentum C. Strait of Messana D. Adriatic Sea 94. Which of these lies on the Adriatic? A. Mutina B. Perusia C. Ancona D.
Recommended publications
  • Golden Dawn and the Right-Wing Extremism in Greece
    Munich Personal RePEc Archive Golden Dawn and the Right-Wing Extremism in Greece Lymouris, Nikolaos November 2013 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/106463/ MPRA Paper No. 106463, posted 08 Mar 2021 07:42 UTC Golden Dawn and the Right-Wing Extremism in Greece Dr Nikolaos Lymouris London School of Economics - Introduction There is an ongoing controversy as to whether extreme right has been a longstanding political phenomenon in Greece or whether it is associated with the ongoing economic crisis. The first view suggests that the extreme right ideology has been an integral part of modern Greek political history because of its tradition of far-right dictatorships. The other view emphasizes the fact that the extreme right in Greece never actually existed simply because of the lack of a nationalist middle class. In effect, the emergence of Golden Dawn is simply an epiphenomenon of the economic crisis. At the same time, a broad new trend was adopted not only by the mass media but also -unfortunately– the academia in order to expand – by using false criteria - the political boundaries of the extreme right, to characterize as many parties as possible as extreme right. In any case, the years after the fall of the Greek junta (from 1974 until today) there are mainly two right-wing parties in the Greek political life: the “United Nationalist Movement” (ENEK in its Greek acronym), a fridge organisation acted during the mid 80’s and has ceased to exist, and the Golden Dawn, whose electoral success provoked an important political and social debate.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Module 3
    COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ELECTORAL SYSTEMS - MODULE 3 (2006-2011) CODEBOOK: APPENDICES Original CSES file name: cses2_codebook_part3_appendices.txt (Version: Full Release - December 15, 2015) GESIS Data Archive for the Social Sciences Publication (pdf-version, December 2015) ============================================================================================= COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ELECTORAL SYSTEMS (CSES) - MODULE 3 (2006-2011) CODEBOOK: APPENDICES APPENDIX I: PARTIES AND LEADERS APPENDIX II: PRIMARY ELECTORAL DISTRICTS FULL RELEASE - DECEMBER 15, 2015 VERSION CSES Secretariat www.cses.org =========================================================================== HOW TO CITE THE STUDY: The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (www.cses.org). CSES MODULE 3 FULL RELEASE [dataset]. December 15, 2015 version. doi:10.7804/cses.module3.2015-12-15 These materials are based on work supported by the American National Science Foundation (www.nsf.gov) under grant numbers SES-0451598 , SES-0817701, and SES-1154687, the GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, the University of Michigan, in-kind support of participating election studies, the many organizations that sponsor planning meetings and conferences, and the many organizations that fund election studies by CSES collaborators. Any opinions, findings and conclusions, or recommendations expressed in these materials are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the funding organizations. =========================================================================== IMPORTANT NOTE REGARDING FULL RELEASES: This dataset and all accompanying documentation is the "Full Release" of CSES Module 3 (2006-2011). Users of the Final Release may wish to monitor the errata for CSES Module 3 on the CSES website, to check for known errors which may impact their analyses. To view errata for CSES Module 3, go to the Data Center on the CSES website, navigate to the CSES Module 3 download page, and click on the Errata link in the gray box to the right of the page.
    [Show full text]
  • Investing in the Roots of Your Political Ancestors
    This is a repository copy of Investing in the roots of your political ancestors. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/174651/ Version: Published Version Monograph: Kammas, P., Poulima, M. and Sarantides, V. orcid.org/0000-0001-9096-4505 (2021) Investing in the roots of your political ancestors. Working Paper. Sheffield Economic Research Paper Series, 2021004 (2021004). Department of Economics, University of Sheffield , Sheffield. ISSN 1749-8368 © 2021 The Author(s). For reuse permissions, please contact the Author(s). Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Department Of Economics Investing in the roots of your political ancestors Pantelis Kammas, Maria Poulima and Vassilis Sarantides Sheffield Economic Research Paper Series SERPS no. 2021004 ISSN 1749-8368 April 2021 Investing in the roots of your political ancestors Pantelis Kammasa, Maria Poulimab and Vassilis Sarantidesc a Athens University of Economics and Business, Patission 76, Athens 10434, Greece.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise of the Golden Dawn: the New Face of the Far Right in Greece
    From the SelectedWorks of Antonis A. Ellinas January 2013 The Rise of the Golden Dawn: The ewN Face of the Far Right in Greece Contact Start Your Own Notify Me Author SelectedWorks of New Work Available at: http://works.bepress.com/antonis_ellinas/12 The Rise of the Golden Dawn: The New Face of the Far Right in Greece Antonis A. Ellinas, University of Cyprus Abstract The article examines the rise of the one of the most extremist political parties in Europe, the Golden Dawn. It sketches the historical trajectory of the Greek far right, examines the ideological, organisational and voter profile of the Golden Dawn, and offers possible explanations for its breakthrough in the 2012 elections. The article shows how the economic crisis has brought about a massive realignment of the Greek electorate away from mainstream parties, giving rise to anti-system and anti- immigrant sentiments. The violent tactics of the Golden Dawn allowed the party to establish an anti-system and anti-immigrant profile, and capitalize on these sentiments. The future of the party will depend on its capacity to organisationally absorb future tensions between party pragmatists and idealists. Key words: Greece, Golden Dawn, National Socialism, far right, Michaloliakos, economic crisis, immigration, anti-system Introduction For a long time late democratized Southern European countries were thought to resist the rise of far right parties observed elsewhere. The legacy of authoritarianism and the absence of postindustrial welfare states presumably limited the electoral demand for the far right (Kitschelt 1995, pp. 52-54; Ignazi 2003, p. 196; Ellinas 2010, p. 38).
    [Show full text]
  • Associate Professor Petros Kalantonis
    Petros Kalantonis email: [email protected] Married, 2 children Military Service: Greek Army Navy Short Curriculum Vitae Studies - Technical University of Crete, Ph.D in Financial Accounting, 2011 - Athens University of Economics and Business, Msc in Statistics, 2002 - University of Piraeus B.Sc in Business Administration, 1995 Academic - Associate Professor in the University of West Attica, Department of Tourism Position Management, since 2018. Academic- - Vice President of the University of West Attica Research Committee, since2019 Administative - Director of the Msc in Operations Management, since2019 Positions - Deputy Chairman of the Department of Tourism Management, since2019 Academic- - Associate Professor, Department of Business Administration, Technological Education Teaching Institute of Piraeus 10/ 2016 - 2/2018 Experience - Assistant Professor, Department of Business Administration, Technological Education Institute of Piraeus, 9/2013 - 10/2016 - Assistant Professor, Department of Tourism Management, Technological Education Institute of Piraeus 8/2012 - 9/2013 - Lecturer , Department of Tourism Management, Technological Education Institute of Piraeus, 12/2006 - 8/12/2012 Teaching - Teaching in Graduate Programm in the following Universities: Experience in University of west Attica, Technological Education Institute of Piraeus in collaboration Graduate with the University of Kentucky, Harokopion University, Hellenic Open University Programs Doctoral - Advisor of 3 Ph.D Students in the University of West Attica Advisor - Member
    [Show full text]
  • Crown Peters 2020 Greece Brochure
    greece & THE BEST OF THE MEDITERRANEAN Greek Islands, Cyprus, 2Ita0ly &2 Cro0 atia As C ROWN PETERS celebrates its 50th anniversary of extraordinary service, we proudly present our 2020 brochure featuring Greece & the Best of the Mediterranean and our new Croatia programs. Due to the continued success of our tour operations, we offer a wider variety of programs to Greece and its neighboring countries; a combination of our best-selling packages, new exclusive tours offering more choices along with our first-rate personalized service. Crown Peters has always set itself apart by its courteous, knowledgeable, and efficient sales staff. And our staff works with you to design your perfect vacation itinerary. Each Crown Peters tour package offers flexibility and creativity. At Crown Peters, we know first-hand how to insure that your vacation surpasses your expectations in every way. You have read about Greece’s rich history and have seen pictures of tranquil landscapes, sun-drenched islands and golden beaches all adorned with jewels from ages past. You’ve also heard tales about the fun-filled, never-ending nightlife. What you haven’t been told is that now you can be part of all that, at a very reasonable cost, without compromising luxury and comfort. We have selected top value motorcoach tours and cruises to complement our deluxe and first class accommodations throughout. Our tour representatives and guides know how to treat you as valued guests and make your trip most pleasant and comfortable; as for our prices, they speak for themselves. 2 Ancient Delphi TABLE OF Come to Greece with us.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberals, Socialists, and Pork-Barrel Politics In
    GEN - Governance and Economics research Network GEN Working Paper B 2016 – 5 webs.uvigo.es/infogen/WP June 2016 LIBERALS, SOCIALISTS, AND PORK-BARREL POLITICS IN GREECE Andrés Rodríguez-Pose* Yannis Psycharis** Vassilis Tselios*** * London School of Economics and GEN ** Panteion University of Social and Political Sciences *** University of Thessaly Liberals, Socialists, and pork-barrel politics in Greece by Andrés Rodríguez-Pose*, Yannis Psycharis** and Vassilis Tselios*** Abstract This paper analyses the role of pork-barrel politics in the allocation of public investment expenditures in Greece. It proposes a model which explicitly relates the allocation of public investment to electoral results using a unique dataset covering the period from the restoration of democracy in 1974 until 2009, just before the Great Recession that radically transformed the political panorama of the country. The analysis includes ten legislative periods marked by governments of the two parties that dominated the political arena in Greece: the Liberal and the Socialist Party. The results show that Socialist and re-elected governments applied more expansionary fiscal policies relative to Liberals. The two main parties also used different tactics when it came to pork-barrelling: while the Socialists when in government rewarded/groomed their electoral fiefs, the Liberals invested in areas controlled by the opposition to win over new votes or seats. Keywords: Public investment, pork-barrel politics, elections, regional policy, Greece JEL classification: P16, R1,
    [Show full text]
  • BHCC NEWSLETTER February 16, 2015
    Health Aid Ltd (mother Building 6 Reproductive 12 About Us 18 Dark Clouds 38 company in England) Like the approaching dusk, confirms that PHARMA Values-Based Tourism CENTER is the first Partnerships in an The Genesis Athens Clinic is ñ BHCC News & Events dark clouds are rolling towards the shores of Europe. These distributor of Health Interconnected World the largest private IVF unit in ñ Upcoming Events Athens and is internationally are difficult times. The Aid products all over By Elizabeth Filippouli, Founder ñ New Members renowned for its work in Eurozone has narrowly avoided the world for 2014 & CEO Global Thinkers. infertility services. disaster… Publication of the British Hellenic Chamber of Commerce, Vas. Sophias 25, Athens. Tel: 210.7210361 Fax: 210.7212119, www.bhcc.gr ñ February 16, 2015 THE EU AND THE BIGGER Viewpoint PICTURE Dear members European politics have changed of the Chamber, dramatically. Now it is more about dear friends collective weight and Europe's clout in the Ladies and Gentlemen, world - power rather than peace. It is an honor to address you page 2 today, at the Chamber's 70th Anniversary. More about the Chamber's history and future will be disclosed during the 70 Year Landmark Reception that the Chamber will hold to accommodate, along with over 350 members, several hundred of friends and partners. More will be recorded in the 70 year Chamber's Commemorative Continued on page 10 February 16, 2015 THE EU AND THE BIGGER PICTURE European politics have changed dramatically. Now it is more about collective weight and Europe's clout in the world - power rather than peace.
    [Show full text]
  • Investing in Long-Run Partisan Loyalty: Empirical Evidence from Post-Dictatorial Greece
    Investing in long-run partisan loyalty: Empirical evidence from post-dictatorial Greece Pantelis Kammasa , Maria Poulimab and Vassilis Sarantidesc a Athens University of Economics and Business, Patission 76, Athens 10434, Greece. [email protected] b Department of Economics, University of Ioannina, P.O. Box 1186, 45110 Ioannina, Greece [email protected] c Department of Economics, University of Sheffield, 9 Mappin Str, Sheffield S1 4DT, UK. [email protected] July 7, 2019 Abstract: This paper examines the role of political incentives in the geographical allocation of public investment in 52 NUTS3-level regions in Greece during the period 1975-1989. Using a novel dataset of decomposed total public investment in nine subcategories (e.g., helath), our analysis indicates that both conservative (1975-1981) and socialist governments (1982-1989) followed vote-maximising strategies. To mitigate endogeneity concerns in our estimates, we provide this evidence based on a difference-in-difference framework that exploits the regime change that occurred in 1981 as a source of exogenous variation in the distribution of political support within the Greek territory. We argue that the main driving of the observed political distortions is long-run partisan loyalty. To put it more simply, parties that dominated in the post-dictatorial period channelled resources in regions that their ancestor pre-coup parties obtained a higher victory margin. We further argue that loyalty establishes strong personalistic networks at the regional level that in turn affect the spatial allocation of public capital. To this end, we show that loyal prefectures are more likely to have strong MP’s with deep family roots in the parliament and/or MP’s with ministerial positions that in both cases can be proven powerful weapons in resource allocation.
    [Show full text]
  • S Victory Seen by a Dockworker, Union Leader from the Port of Piraeus
    SyrizaâEuros"s victory seen by a dockworker, union leader from the Port of Piraeus https://internationalviewpoint.org/spip.php?article3883 Greece SyrizaâEuros"s victory seen by a dockworker, union leader from the Port of Piraeus - IV Online magazine - 2015 - IV481 - February 2015 - Publication date: Saturday 21 February 2015 Copyright © International Viewpoint - online socialist magazine - All rights reserved Copyright © International Viewpoint - online socialist magazine Page 1/11 SyrizaâEuros"s victory seen by a dockworker, union leader from the Port of Piraeus Fol­low­ing the col­lapse of the Greek econ­omy, the mem­o­ran­dum with the troika included a pro­vi­sion to sell off prof­itable state-owned com­pa­nies to pay back loans to for­eign lenders, result­ing in the par­tial pri­va­ti­za­tion of the Port of Piraeus, GreeceâEuros"s largest port, where Chi­nese state-owned ship­ping company COSCO now holds the con­ces­sion for two con­tainer ter­mi­nals. Since that time, dock­work­ers have waged a mil­i­tant and sus­tained strug­gle, with strong local alliances in Piraeus and inter­na­tional sup­port from dock­work­ers around Europe, to return the port to full pub­lic own­er­ship and improve the poor work­ing con­di­tions at the pri­va­tized COSCO ter­mi­nals. Gior­gos Gogos is a Greek dock­worker and union leader from the Port of Piraeus. A mem­ber of SYRIZA, he is active at the regional and union lev­els of the party and is engaged in local orga­niz­ing efforts in Piraeus, the large urban indus­trial area sur­round­ing the port out­side of Athens.
    [Show full text]
  • Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography # 16.15 Liberals
    Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography # 16.15 Liberals, Socialists, and pork-barrel politics in Greece Andrés Rodríguez-Pose, Yannis Psycharis, Vassilis Tselios http://econ.geog.uu.nl/peeg/peeg.html Liberals, Socialists, and pork-barrel politics in Greece by Andrés Rodríguez-Pose*, Yannis Psycharis** and Vassilis Tselios*** Abstract This paper analyses the role of pork-barrel politics in the allocation of public investment expenditures in Greece. It proposes a model which explicitly relates the allocation of public investment to electoral results using a unique dataset covering the period from the restoration of democracy in 1974 until 2009, just before the Great Recession that radically transformed the political panorama of the country. The analysis includes ten legislative periods marked by governments of the two parties that dominated the political arena in Greece: the Liberal and the Socialist Party. The results show that Socialist and re-elected governments applied more expansionary fiscal policies relative to Liberals. The two main parties also used different tactics when it came to pork-barrelling: while the Socialists when in government rewarded/groomed their electoral fiefs, the Liberals invested in areas controlled by the opposition to win over new votes or seats. Keywords: Public investment, pork-barrel politics, elections, regional policy, Greece JEL classification: P16, R1, R12, R42, R58, H54 Authors’ addresses: *Department of Geography and Environment **Department of Economic and Regional London School of Economics Development Houghton St Panteion University of Social and Political London WC2A 2AE, UK Sciences Tel: +44 (0)207 955 7971 136 Syngrou Avenue Fax: +44 (0)207 955 7412 176 71 Athens, Greece E-mail: [email protected] Tel: +30 210 9201722 Fax: +30 210 9232979 E-mail: [email protected] *** Department of Planning and Regional Development University of Thessaly Pedion Areos Volos, 383 34, Greece Tel: +30 24210 74451 Fax: +30 24210 74380 E-mail: [email protected] 1 1.
    [Show full text]
  • SMALL ENTERPRISES INSTITUTE Co-Financed by Greece and the European Union (European Social Fund)
    www.gsevee.gr www.imegsevee.gr www.kekgsevee.gr This report has been developed by IME GSEVEE within the framework of the subproject 17 “Development of networks and partnerships between GSEVEE and social partners, trade unions, professional and research organisations at national and European level” of the action “Promotion of the institutional and operational capacity of GSEVEE” (MIS No. 296403). The project is financed by the Operational Programme “Human Resources Development” of the Ministry of Labour, Social Insurance and Social Solidarity and it is SMALL ENTERPRISES INSTITUTE co-financed by Greece and the European Union (European Social Fund). Hellenic Confederation of Professionals, Craftsmen, and Merchants Ευρωπαϊκή Ένωση ΕΥΡΩΠΑΪΚΟ ΚΟΙΝΩΝΙΚΟ ΤΑΜΕΙΟ Ευρωπαϊκό Κοινωνικό Ταμείο Με τη συγχρηµατοδότηση της Ελλάδας και της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης IME GSEVEE Small Enterprises’ Institute Hellenic Confederation of Professionals, Craftsmen, and Merchants Address: 46, Aristotelous Street, 10433 Athens Tel: +30 210-8846852 Fax: +30 210-8846853 E-mail: [email protected] www.imegsevee.gr Title: Activities’ Report of IME GSEVEE Publisher: IME GSEVEE Publication Date: 2015 Contributors Texts: Lintzeris Paraskevas, Avlonitou Natasa, Moka Lena Original Language: Greek Design: Biliouri Christina Cover & photos: Shutterstock Translation: Sampathianaki Aikaterini Review: Lambrakis Katherine This report has been developed by IME GSEVEE within the framework of the subproject 17 “Development of networks and partnerships between GSEVEE and social partners, trade unions, professional and research organi- sations at national and European level” of the action “Promotion of the institutional and operational capacity of GSEVEE” (MIS No. 296403). The project is financed by the Operational Programme “Human Resources Develop- ment” of the Ministry of Labour, Social Insurance and Social Solidarity and it is co-financed by Greece and the European Union (European Social Fund).
    [Show full text]