October 2000 Federal Election Commission Volume 26, Number 10

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

October 2000 Federal Election Commission Volume 26, Number 10 October 2000 Federal Election Commission Volume 26, Number 10 Table of Contents Reports Compliance Reports Compliance 1 On-line 48-Hour Notices Available for the General Election On-line 48-Hour Notices FEC Implements 1 Web Access to Senate Candidates’ Available for the General Administrative Fines Program Campaign Finance Reports Election As part of its new Administrative In order to reduce the number of Fines Program, the Federal Election Compliance faxed, mailed and hand-delivered Commission sent notices to commit- 1 FEC Implements Administrative tees that failed to file their July Fines Program 48-Hour Notices (Form 6), a Web- 9 Nonfilers based filing system is being devel- Quarterly Report, or filed this report oped to enable filers to create and late, informing them that the Com- 2 Advisory Opinions submit their 48-Hour Notices mission had found reason to believe entirely on line. Even committees they had violated the Federal Court Cases that do not currently file electroni- Election Campaign Act. Civil 6 On Appeal? cally and those that use software money penalties, ranging from $125 that does not allow for the creation to $12,000, were included in the Public Funding of Form 6 will be able to use the on- “Reason to Believe” notices. 6 Public Funding for Gore- line filing system to file their 48- Committees had 40 days to either Lieberman Hour Notices electronically. 6 Public Funding for Buchanan- (continued on page 2) Foster This Web-based filing system is 7 August Matching Fund Payments different from the current electronic filing system, which allows commit- Web Access to Election Administration tees to file Form 6 through the file Senate Candidates’ 8 Revised National Mail Voter upload process built into electronic Campaign Finance Registration filing software packages. Under Reports those software systems, the transac- Senate campaign finance reports Outreach tions are keyed into the software, are now available to the public on 8 FEC Roundtables and the data reside on the local or 8 Public Appearances the FEC Web site. All Senate network drive. By contrast, the new reports received after May 15, Browser-based version allows filers Statistics 2000, are currently accessible on 9 Midyear PAC Count Shows Slight to log onto the FEC filing Web site the site, and the FEC will make Decrease from December 1999 and enter the transactions directly. future reports available within 48 hours of receiving them. To view these reports, go to www.fec.gov, click on “Campaign Finance Reports and Data,” and then select “View (continued on page 2) Financial Reports.” Federal Election Commission RECORD October 2000 Reports Compliance (continued from page 1) (continued from page 1) Advisory With this new system, the informa- pay the penalties or submit written Opinions tion is stored in local memory until responses challenging the alleged the committee treasurer presses the violations or the amount of the “submit” button, thereby sending penalties. AO 2000-16 the report to the FEC. The July Quarterly Report was Placing Political The FEC will soon be sending, by the first report handled under the Advertisements on Internet mail, electronic filing passwords new Administrative Fines program, for Academic Study (PIN numbers) to treasurers for and the number of late filers Third Millennium: Advocates for House and Presidential campaign dropped significantly. While 30 the Future, Inc., (Third Millennium) committees that are running in the percent of filers were late for the may place advertisements for General Election1 but do not yet April quarterly filing, only 18 Presidential candidates on the have PIN numbers. With this PIN percent of filers were late for the Internet to study their effects on number, treasurers will have the July quarterly filing. voter participation among young option to log into the FEC Web site For more information on the adults. and fill out and submit a 48-Hour Administrative Fines Program, see Third Millennium—a nonprofit notice electronically. (Paper notices the May Record, page 1, and the corporation that encourages younger will also be accepted.) July Record, page 1. Information is Americans to participate in the For more information, visit the also available at the FEC’s Web site electoral and legislative process— FEC Web site at www.fec.gov and at www.fec.gov. proposes to study the effect of click on the Electronic Filing logo.✦ Free copies of the final rules as Internet advertising on young they appeared in the Federal voters. To this end, it has retained Register (65 FR 31787, May 19, the services of Juno, an established 1 Senate committees file with the 2000) are available through the Internet service provider that offers Secretary of the Senate and cannot FEC’s Faxline (202/501-3413, free Internet access to subscribers participate in electronic filing. They document 247) and on the FEC’s who agree to provide demographic must continue to file 48-hour notices on Web site at http://www.fec.gov/pdf/ information to Juno and to view on- paper with the Secretary of the Senate. 00%20Administrative%20Fines line advertisements. Using Juno’s %20E&J.pdf.✦ demographic data, Third Millen- Federal Election Commission nium intends to randomly select (continued on page 9) 999 E Street, NW subscribers to view advertisements Washington, DC 20463 supporting one or all of the current, 800/424-9530 Do You Need ballot-qualified Presidential candi- 202/694-1100 Copies of dates, and then measure these 202/501-3413 (FEC Faxline) Campaign Guides? subscribers’ voting patterns through 202/219-3336 (TDD for the a post-election survey.1 hearing impaired) The FEC publishes four Third Millennium will either use 800/877-8339 (FIRS) Campaign Guides—each for a the content and design of advertise- Darryl R. Wold, Chairman different type of committee— ments created by each Presidential Danny L. McDonald, that explain the Federal campaign or create its own adver- Vice Chairman Election Campaign Act and tisements from available materials. David M. Mason, Commissioner Commission regulations and In doing so, Third Millennium Karl J. Sandstrom, Commissioner will treat each candidate equally as their practical application to Bradley Smith, Commissioner it obtains or develops the ads, giving Scott E. Thomas, Commissioner your committee. These guides none a qualitative or quantitative are available free of charge. James A. Pehrkon, Staff Director Lawrence M. Noble, General If you would like to receive Counsel copies of any of the guides, please fill out and mail the Published by the Information 1 order form on the inside of the The range of candidates for whom ads Division will be shown will include all the Louise D. Wides, Director back cover of this issue of the general election presidential candidates Amy L. Kort, Editor Record (see page 11). who appear on enough state ballots to http://www.fec.gov win an Electronic College majority. 2 October 2000 Federal Election Commission RECORD advantage. It will not pay the • The submission of petitions payment periods ended on either the campaigns for materials provided, seeking ballot access for either Mr. date of their nomination by the last and it reserves the right to reject Nader (as an independent) or the state party to make its nomination or material that mentions or alludes to state Green Party in states where the last date of the last major party another candidate. Third Millen- neither the Party nor its state Presidential nomination convention, nium will present the study’s results affiliate had previously attained whichever date was earlier. 3 In at a cross-disciplinary conference it ballot access for its candidates. In these cases, the Commission found will host in December 2000. 30 of these states, the petition that neither the Matching Act nor The Commission found Third process was not complete until Commission regulations require that Millennium’s proposal permissible after the ASGP convention and, in the matching payment period for under the Federal Election Cam- six states, the deadline fell after the one non-major party Presidential paign Act and Commission regula- Presidential convention held by the candidate be shorter than that for tions. Individual Commissioners Democratic National Convention another such candidate solely explained their reasons for voting to on August 14-17, 2000. because one was seeking a national approve this opinion in separate • His convention nomination by the party nomination by national concurring statements. South Carolina United Citizen’s convention and the other was Date issued: August 28, 2000; Party (UCP) on August 12, 2000. seeking nomination by several state Length: 5 pages.✦ political parties. Under the Matching Act2 and In Mr. Nader’s case, the Commis- Commission regulations, the term sion found that his matching pay- “matching payment period” means AO 2000-18 ment period would end August 12, the period beginning at the start of Closing Date of Matching 2000, the date he received the the calendar year in which a Presi- nomination of the UCP, which Fund Period for Nader 2000 dential general election is held and predated the close of the Democratic The primary matching fund ending on the date the national National Convention (the last payment period for Ralph Nader’s convention of the candidate’s party national convention held by a major primary campaign committee, the nominates its Presidential candidate. Nader 2000 Primary Committee, In the case of a party that does not party). Inc. (the Committee), ended August Date Issued: August 11, 2000; nominate its Presidential candidate ✦ 12, 2000, which was the day he by national convention, the match- Length: 4 pages. received the South Carolina United ing payment period ends on the date Citizen’s Party’s (UCP) Presidential the party nominates its Presidential nomination. candidate or on the last day of the Mr.
Recommended publications
  • Federal Election Commission 1 2 First General Counsel's
    MUR759900019 1 FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 2 3 FIRST GENERAL COUNSEL’S REPORT 4 5 MUR 7304 6 DATE COMPLAINT FILED: December 15, 2017 7 DATE OF NOTIFICATIONS: December 21, 2017 8 DATE LAST RESPONSE RECEIVED September 4, 2018 9 DATE ACTIVATED: May 3, 2018 10 11 EARLIEST SOL: September 10, 2020 12 LATEST SOL: December 31, 2021 13 ELECTION CYCLE: 2016 14 15 COMPLAINANT: Committee to Defend the President 16 17 RESPONDENTS: Hillary Victory Fund and Elizabeth Jones in her official capacity as 18 treasurer 19 Hillary Rodham Clinton 20 Hillary for America and Elizabeth Jones in her official capacity as 21 treasurer 22 DNC Services Corporation/Democratic National Committee and 23 William Q. Derrough in his official capacity as treasurer 24 Alaska Democratic Party and Carolyn Covington in her official 25 capacity as treasurer 26 Democratic Party of Arkansas and Dawne Vandiver in her official 27 capacity as treasurer 28 Colorado Democratic Party and Rita Simas in her official capacity 29 as treasurer 30 Democratic State Committee (Delaware) and Helene Keeley in her 31 official capacity as treasurer 32 Democratic Executive Committee of Florida and Francesca Menes 33 in her official capacity as treasurer 34 Georgia Federal Elections Committee and Kip Carr in his official 35 capacity as treasurer 36 Idaho State Democratic Party and Leroy Hayes in his official 37 capacity as treasurer 38 Indiana Democratic Congressional Victory Committee and Henry 39 Fernandez in his official capacity as treasurer 40 Iowa Democratic Party and Ken Sagar in his official capacity as 41 treasurer 42 Kansas Democratic Party and Bill Hutton in his official capacity as 43 treasurer 44 Kentucky State Democratic Central Executive Committee and M.
    [Show full text]
  • Alaskan Election Law in 2020
    37.2 KEYNOTE ADDRESS (DO NOT DELETE) 2/21/2021 6:45 PM KEYNOTE ADDRESS ALASKAN ELECTION LAW IN 2020 ERWIN CHEMERINSKY* As we face the momentous 2020 elections, this is an incredibly timely moment to be discussing election law in general and Alaska election law in particular. In my talk this morning, I will focus on three questions. First, what is the approach of the United States Supreme Court this year towards election law issues? Second, what historically was the approach to Alaska election issues? And third, what are some of the most important current issues with regard to Alaska election law? On the first question, it is important to discuss election law in the context of this moment in the midst of a 2020 national election—an election unlike any other in our history. There is clearly a political context to this question. Let me try to state it as fairly as I can in terms of the competing world view positions. The competing positions have never been as sharply drawn. The Republican position is that voter fraud is a major problem in the United States and that absentee ballots risk great voter fraud. Politically, Republicans perceive fewer absentee ballots being cast to be to their party’s benefit. They see absentee ballots as much more likely to favor Democrats than Republicans. So, in litigation going on all over the country, Republicans are trying to limit the ability of people to cast absentee ballots and limit the time period within which those ballots must be received in order to be counted.
    [Show full text]
  • State V. Alaska Democratic Party
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALASKA State of Alaska, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Supreme Court No. S-16875 ) Alaska Democratic Party, ) ) Appellee. ) ~~~~~~~~~-) Case No.: 1JU-17-00563CI APPEAL FROM THE SUPERIOR COURT FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT AT JUNEAU THE HONORABLE PHILIP M. PALLENBERG, JUDGE APPELLANT'S EXCERPT OF RECORD VOLUME 1OF1 JAHNA LINDEMUTH ATTORNEY GENERAL c._______.,·-~~ or · ·Laur Fox ( 05015) 1J As;S' stant Attorney General Department of Law L.. -_/- 1031 West Fourth Avenue, Suite 200 Anchorage, AK 99501 (907) 269-5100 Filed in the Supreme Court of the State of Alaska on December , 2017 MARILYN MAY, CLERK Appellate Courts By: Deputy Clerk TABLE OF CONTENTS Alaska Democratic Party, Party Plan of Organization, Adopted May 15, 2016 ..................................... ... ................................................. 001 Complaint for Declaratory Judgment and Injunctive Relief, February 22, 2017 ............ ........ ...... ........... ........... ............ .. .... ............................... 037 Alaska Democratic Party's Motion for Summary Judgment, June 19, 2017 ......... ... ....... .. ..................................................................... .......... .... 043 State of Alaska's Motion for Summary Judgment, June 19, 2017 .............................. .. ...... ............... .. .......... ...... .......... .. ......... .... ..... ... 058 Affidavit of Josephine Bahnke, June 19, 2017 ... ............. ........................................................................................ 095
    [Show full text]
  • FEDERAL ELECTIONS 2018: Election Results for the U.S. Senate and The
    FEDERAL ELECTIONS 2018 Election Results for the U.S. Senate and the U.S. House of Representatives Federal Election Commission Washington, D.C. October 2019 Commissioners Ellen L. Weintraub, Chair Caroline C. Hunter, Vice Chair Steven T. Walther (Vacant) (Vacant) (Vacant) Statutory Officers Alec Palmer, Staff Director Lisa J. Stevenson, Acting General Counsel Christopher Skinner, Inspector General Compiled by: Federal Election Commission Public Disclosure and Media Relations Division Office of Communications 1050 First Street, N.E. Washington, D.C. 20463 800/424-9530 202/694-1120 Editors: Eileen J. Leamon, Deputy Assistant Staff Director for Disclosure Jason Bucelato, Senior Public Affairs Specialist Map Design: James Landon Jones, Multimedia Specialist TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Preface 1 Explanatory Notes 2 I. 2018 Election Results: Tables and Maps A. Summary Tables Table: 2018 General Election Votes Cast for U.S. Senate and House 5 Table: 2018 General Election Votes Cast by Party 6 Table: 2018 Primary and General Election Votes Cast for U.S. Congress 7 Table: 2018 Votes Cast for the U.S. Senate by Party 8 Table: 2018 Votes Cast for the U.S. House of Representatives by Party 9 B. Maps United States Congress Map: 2018 U.S. Senate Campaigns 11 Map: 2018 U.S. Senate Victors by Party 12 Map: 2018 U.S. Senate Victors by Popular Vote 13 Map: U.S. Senate Breakdown by Party after the 2018 General Election 14 Map: U.S. House Delegations by Party after the 2018 General Election 15 Map: U.S. House Delegations: States in Which All 2018 Incumbents Sought and Won Re-Election 16 II.
    [Show full text]
  • F* / I / 7Flflll HPT Ior* • , ^ Federal Election Commission M ., K
    Brooks^^ |-u:.c-: ..,. •HUH FEOEKA'LLU criON »rag«>AkW^Ui27 COMiJSSl'OM October 3,2004 General Counsel /- f* / I / 7flflll HPT i o r* • , ^ Federal Election Commission m _ ., K ^> W+" ™ OCT 12 P |: U3 999EStreet MUR#.V ^ V t , Washington DC 20463 Re: Complaint against Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC), Tony Knowles, a candidate for me US Senate from Alaska, the Tony Knowles for Senate Committee, Leslie Riddle, Treasurer, and Alaska Democratic Party (ADP), JoeUe Hall, Treasurer Dear Sir: This is a formal complaint to the Federal Election Commission (FEC) concerning the above-named entities. This complaint will demonstrate that the DSCC and the ADP have, and are continuing to make, illegal in-kind donations to the Knowles campaign and are making illegal coordinated communications to benefit the Knowles for Senate Committee. The Knowles committee is violating the law by accepting those in-kind donations and illegal coordinated communications. Since January 1,2003 the DSCC has donated $ 1,700,000 to the ADP. (Exhibit A) The ADP has used that money to open campaign offices across Alaska. They have opened offices in 12 communities including in many communities which have never had a Democratic Party office before. In 2002 when the Democrat Party had a competitive candidate for governor the ADP spent considerably less than they are spending this year and opened far fewer offices. The ADP had only six employees in 2002 and by early August 2002 had received a total of $60,356. This year its FEC reports show the ADP is paying payroll of at least 104 different people including Jim Messina, who was reported in the press to be Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of the Digital Political Advertising Network
    PLATFORMS AND OUTSIDERS IN PARTY NETWORKS: THE EVOLUTION OF THE DIGITAL POLITICAL ADVERTISING NETWORK Bridget Barrett A thesis submitted to the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts at the Hussman School of Journalism and Media. Chapel Hill 2020 Approved by: Daniel Kreiss Adam Saffer Adam Sheingate © 2020 Bridget Barrett ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Bridget Barrett: Platforms and Outsiders in Party Networks: The Evolution of the Digital Political Advertising Network (Under the direction of Daniel Kreiss) Scholars seldom examine the companies that campaigns hire to run digital advertising. This thesis presents the first network analysis of relationships between federal political committees (n = 2,077) and the companies they hired for electoral digital political advertising services (n = 1,034) across 13 years (2003–2016) and three election cycles (2008, 2012, and 2016). The network expanded from 333 nodes in 2008 to 2,202 nodes in 2016. In 2012 and 2016, Facebook and Google had the highest normalized betweenness centrality (.34 and .27 in 2012 and .55 and .24 in 2016 respectively). Given their positions in the network, Facebook and Google should be considered consequential members of party networks. Of advertising agencies hired in the 2016 electoral cycle, 23% had no declared political specialization and were hired disproportionately by non-incumbents. The thesis argues their motivations may not be as well-aligned with party goals as those of established political professionals. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES .................................................................................................................... V POLITICAL CONSULTING AND PARTY NETWORKS ...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Democratic Party Final Proposed Platform
    4 2020 DEMOCRATIC PARTY FINAL PROPOSED PLATFORM Platform Committee Approved – Final May 12, 2020 1 Table of Contents PREAMBLE ........................................................................................................................ 4 PART ONE - PRINCIPLES OF GOVERNANCE .............................................................. 4 CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS. ................................................................................................. 4 PRIVACY. .......................................................................................................................... 4 ACCOUNTABLE LEADERSHIP. ............................................................................................. 5 CONFLICT OF INTEREST. .................................................................................................... 5 CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION. ......................................................................................... 5 PART TWO - SUFFRAGE AND ELECTIONS .................................................................. 5 VOTING PROCESS. ............................................................................................................ 5 MAIL IN VOTING. ................................................................................................................ 6 VOTING RIGHTS................................................................................................................. 6 DISENFRANCHISEMENT OF U.S. CITIZENS SERVING TIME IN PRISON. .................................. 6 BALLOTS.
    [Show full text]
  • Recognized Political Parties in Alaska
    Recognized Political Party Status Attained by Alaska Statutory Requirements Alaska Democratic Party (D) Alaskan Independence Party (A) Casey Steinau, Chair Robert M. Bird - Chair 2602 Fairbanks Street 50615 Shemya Way Anchorage, AK 99503 Kenai, AK 99611 Phone: (907) 258-3050 907-398-9373 Fax: (907) 258-1626 [email protected] Email: [email protected] Alaska Republican Party (R) Glenn Clary, Chair 1000 O’Malley Rd. Suite 8 PO Box 201049 Anchorage, AK 99520-1049 Phone: (907) 868-1093 Email: [email protected] Political Groups Seeking Recognized Political Party Status Alaska Constitution Party (C) Alliance Party of Alaska (K) J.R. Myers, Chair Hezekiah R. “Ky” Holland - Chair P.O. Box 2164 14020 Stover Place Cut Bank, MT 59427 Anchorage, AK 99516 Phone: (907) 690-5200 Phone: (907) 727-2735 Email: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Green Party of Alaska (G) Alaska Libertarian Party (L) Robert Shields, Chair Jon Briggs Watts, Chair 145 Marten Dr. P.O. Box 85075 Fairbanks, AK 99712 Anchorage, AK 99503 Phone: (907) 799-7045 Phone: (907) 642-3245 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Moderate Party of Alaska (E) OWL Party (H) Danny Alkasmi - Chair James Jarrett – Chair 2248 450th Avenue P.O. Box 140343 Wallinford, IA 51365 Anchorage, AK 99514 Phone: (712) 260-1755 Phone: (907) 764-3960 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Patriot’s Party of Alaska (P) Progressive Party of Alaska (O) Nick Philo – Chair Soni Biehl - Chair 2521 E. Mtn Village Drive 351 Wilcox Road Ste. B PMB 756 Trescott Township, ME 04652 Wasilla, AK 99654 Phone:(207) 733-1095 Phone: (907) 521-3447 E-mail: [email protected] Email: [email protected] UCES' Clowns Party (W) Veterans Party of Alaska (V) David Fluhart - Chair Steve Harrison, Chair P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Improving the Top-Two Primary for Congressional and State Races
    Towards a More Perfect Election: Improving the Top-Two Primary for Congressional and State Races CHENWEI ZHANG* I. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................. 615 1I. B ACKGROUN D ................................................................................ 620 A. An Overview of the Law RegardingPrimaries ....................... 620 1. Types of Primaries............................................................ 620 2. Supreme Court JurisprudenceRegarding Political Partiesand Primaries....................................................... 622 B. The Evolution of the Top-Two Primary.................................. 624 1. A laska................................................................................ 62 5 2. L ouisiana .......................................................................... 625 3. California ......................................................................... 626 4. Washington ............................. ... 627 5. O regon ........................................... ................................... 630 I1. THE PROS AND CONS OF Top-Two PRIMARIES .............................. 630 A . P ros ......................................................................................... 63 1 1. ModeratingEffects ............................................................ 631 2. Increasing Voter Turnout................................................... 633 B . C ons ....................................................................................... 633
    [Show full text]
  • OFFICIAL ELECTION PAMPHLET State of Alaska
    OFFICIAL ELECTION PAMPHLET State of Alaska TheThe Division Division of of Elections Elections celebrates celebrates the historyhistory ofof strongstrong women women of of Alaska Alaska and and women’s women’s suffrage! suffrage! Region IV NORTON SOUND KOTLIK YUP’IK VOTE November 3, 2020 YUKON YUP’IK Alaska’s Ballot Counting System // Alaska-m Cucuklircuutnek Naaqiyaraa Your ote is ecure Cuculillren aunumauq! lasa uses three dierent methods to count ballots: lasa- cuculircuutnek naaiaarangertu ingaunek: ❖ and-count nateun-naalui ❖ recinct canner Cuculiraram unaiurutiita aaissuutiiun ❖ oting Tablet Comuter-aarngalngurun Cuculircuun Alaska’s ballot tabulation system has a paper trail of every ballot cast. Each precinct receives paper ballots that are either hand-counted hen the olls close or are scanned during the da as the voter inserts the ballot into the recinct scanner and the results are tabulated ater the olls close n addition during ederal elections each recinct has a voting tablet Deending on location some are euied ith a voter-veriiable aer trail that allos the voter to veri the rinted version o the ballot rior to casting the ballot.) lasa-m cuculircuutain naaissuutait emangalriane aliartangelartu cuculillritne uut. Tamarmeng cuculirviit ciiumalartut cuculircuutne unateun naaumaaranek cucuklirviit umgaarcelluki wall’u naaumaaluteng erenrumainanrani cuculiraram nunaiurutiita naaissuutiiun cuculilriim itertaaku cuculircuutni tuavet aiutellret-llu naaumaciluteng cuculirviit umata Cali-llu Nunaramta Cuculiraraani tamarmeng cuculiraram nunaiurutait comuter-aarngalngurun cuculircuutengqetuut (Comuter-aarngalnguut cuculircuutet ilait aliartangertut asguranairugngalriame uvrirugngalriame angilegme cuculitulim iciutassiarugngaluu cuculircuutem aliartaa cuculircuutni tunvailegminiu.) The ballot tabulation sstem used in lasa to roduce and count ballots is ederall certiied and is thoroughl tested rior to each election t is a stand-alone sstem that is not connected to the internet or to a netork.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Senate Overview: Senate Is (Still) in Play
    This issue brought to you by 2020 Senate Overview: Senate is (Still) In Play By Nathan L. Gonzales & Jacob Rubashkin APRIL 3, 2020 VOLUME 4, NO. 7 The spread of coronavirus has thrown even the most mundane tasks into uncertainty, yet the fight for the Senate remains the same. Control of the Senate was on the line before the health crisis and continues to be at stake in November. 2020 Senate Ratings Over the last year, the size and scope of the battlefield has evolved, Toss-Up almost all in favor of Democrats. Minnesota and New Hampshire, Collins (R-Maine)# Tillis (R-N.C.) currently held by Democrats, have dropped from the list of most McSally (R-Ariz.) competitive races, while Republican-held seats in Texas, Kansas, an additional Georgia seat and most recently Montana are now in play. Tilt Democratic Tilt Republican Democrats, however, have had a plausible path since at least October. Gardner (R-Colo.)# Republicans are now defending 10 of the 12 most competitive Lean Democratic Lean Republican Senate seats in the country. That discrepancy is part of the reason why Democrats are within striking distance of the net gain of four seats they Peters (D-Mich.) KS Open (Roberts, R) need for a majority. Democrats can also control the Senate by gaining Daines (R-Mont.) three seats and winning the presidential race. Ernst (R-Iowa) Some Republicans believe GOP senators could see a boost from the Jones (D-Ala.) coronavirus crisis because it’s an opportunity to demonstrate tangible Likely Democratic Likely Republican work being done by Congress, including dispersing cash.
    [Show full text]
  • The Anchorage Times P.O
    I 0 The Anchorage Times P.O. Box 100040 Anchorage, Alaska 995 10 Bill J. Allen, Publisher William J. Tobin, Senior Editor Resume William J. Tobin Date of Birth: Place of Birth: Joplin, Missouri Education: Butler University, Indianapolis, Ind., Bachelor of Science, Journalism major, 1948 Professional : 1945-1946, Indianapolis Star, general news and sports stringer 1946- 1950, Associated Press, Indianapolis, staff writer 1950-1952, active duty, U.S.Army 1952-1953, Associated Press Newsfeatures, New York, N.Y. 1954-1955, Associated Press, regional membership executive, Louisville, Ky. 1956- 1960, Associated Press, correspondent, Juneau, Alaska 1960- 1961, Associated Press, assistant chief of bureau, Baltimore, Md. 196 1-1963, Associated Press, chief of bureau, Helena, Mont. 1963- 1992, The Anchorage Times, successively as managing editor, associate editor, general manager, editor in chief, assistant publisher 1992 to present, The Voice of The Times, senior editor Awards: 1980: C.B. Blethen Memorial Award, fist place 1982: Butler University Journalism Alumni Award for Distinguished Service to Journalism 1988: Alaskan of the Year 1990: Gold Pan Award for Distinguished Public Service, hchorage Chamber of Commerce 2002: Gov. Willliarn A. Egan Alaskan of the Year Award; Alaska State Chamber of Commerce Voice of the Times A CONSERVATIVE VOICE FOR AIASIKAIQS Pafje ro - c Page 2 Professional Activities: ' Alaska Press Club, three-time president Alaska Associated Press Members Association, past president Society of Professional Journalists, Alaska
    [Show full text]