Endodontic Recommended Reading List 2018 A. ความรู้วิทยาศาสตร์พื้นฐาน 1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Endodontic Recommended Reading List 2018 A. ความรู้วิทยาศาสตร์พื้นฐาน 1 1 Endodontic Recommended Reading List 2018 A. ความรู้วิทยาศาสตร์พื้นฐาน 1. Gross, microscopic และ ultrastructural anatomy of soft and hard tissue (tooth and surrounding) 2. Embryology, histology, bone biology 3. Microbiology 4. Oral infection & immunology 5. Oral medicine, Oral pathology 6. Inflammation & healing 7. ชีวสถิติ 8. ความรู้กฎหมายวิชาชีพ เจตคติ และจรรยาบรรณแห่งวิชาชีพทันตกรรม B. วิทยาศาสตร์การแพทย์ที่เกี่ยวข้องกับสาขา 1. Embryology, histology, physiology of pulp and periapical tissue 2. Biology of dental pulp 1. Bennett CG, Kelln EE, Biddington WR. Age changes of the vascular pattern of the human dental pulp. Arch Oral Biol. 1965;10(6):995-8. 2. Bernick S. Effect of aging on the nerve supply to human teeth. J Dent Res. 1967;46(4):694- 9. 3. Bernick S. Lymphatic vessels of the human dental pulp. J Dent Res. 1977;56(1):70-7. 4. Brannstrom M. The hydrodynamic theory of dentinal pain: sensation in preparations, caries, and the dentinal crack syndrome. J Endod. 1986;12(10):453-7. 2 5. Brannstrom M, Linden LA, Johnson G. Movement of dentinal and pulpal fluid caused by clinical procedures. J Dent Res. 1968;47(5):679-82. 6. Byers MR, Neuhaus SJ, Gehrig JD. Dental sensory receptor structure in human teeth. Pain. 1982;13(3):221-35. 7. Carrigan PJ, Morse DR, Furst ML, Sinai IH. A scanning electron microscopic evaluation of human dentinal tubules according to age and location. J Endod. 1984;10(8):359-63. 8. DENTISTRY AAOP. Guideline on Pulp Therapy for Primary and Immature Permanent Teeth. Pediatr Dent. 2016;38(6):280-8. 9. Fitzgerald M, Chiego DJ, Jr., Heys DR. Autoradiographic analysis of odontoblast replacement following pulp exposure in primate teeth. Arch Oral Biol. 1990;35(9):707-15. 10. Fulling HJ, Andreasen JO. Influence of maturation status and tooth type of permanent teeth upon electrometric and thermal pulp testing. Scand J Dent Res. 1976;84(5):286-90. 11. Goodis HE, Winthrop V, White JM. Pulpal responses to cooling tooth temperatures. J Endod. 2000;26(5):263-7. 12. Hargreaves KM, Swift JQ, Roszkowski MT, Bowles W, Garry MG, Jackson DL. Pharmacology of peripheral neuropeptide and inflammatory mediator release. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1994;78(4):503-10. 13. Hillmann G, Geurtsen W. Light-microscopical investigation of the distribution of extracellular matrix molecules and calcifications in human dental pulps of various ages. Cell Tissue Res. 1997;289(1):145-54. 14. Holland GR. The odontoblast process: form and function. J Dent Res. 1985;64 Spec No:499-514. 15. Johnsen DC. Innervation of teeth: qualitative, quantitative, and developmental assessment. J Dent Res. 1985;64 Spec No:555-63. 16. Kim S. Regulation of pulpal blood flow. J Dent Res. 1985;64 Spec No:590-6. 17. Kim S. Microcirculation of the dental pulp in health and disease. J Endod. 1985;11(11):465-71. 18. Kim S. Neurovascular interactions in the dental pulp in health and inflammation. J Endod. 1990;16(2):48-53. 3 19. Linde A. The extracellular matrix of the dental pulp and dentin. J Dent Res. 1985;64 Spec No:523-9. 20. Mangkornkarn C, Steiner JC. In vivo and in vitro glycosaminoglycans from human dental pulp. J Endod. 1992;18(7):327-31. 21. Murray PE, Matthews JB, Sloan AJ, Smith AJ. Analysis of incisor pulp cell populations in Wistar rats of different ages. Arch Oral Biol. 2002;47(10):709-15. 22. Murray PE, Stanley HR, Matthews JB, Sloan AJ, Smith AJ. Age-related odontometric changes of human teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2002;93(4):474-82. 23. Nair PN. Neural elements in dental pulp and dentin. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1995;80(6):710-9. 24. Narhi M, Jyvasjarvi E, Virtanen A, Huopaniemi T, Ngassapa D, Hirvonen T. Role of intradental A- and C-type nerve fibres in dental pain mechanisms. Proc Finn Dent Soc. 1992;88 Suppl 1:507-16. 25. Okamura K, Kobayashi I, Matsuo K, Taniguchi K, Ishibashi Y, Izumi T, et al. Ultrastructure of the neuromuscular junction of vasomotor nerves in the microvasculature of human dental pulp. Arch Oral Biol. 1994;39(3):171-6. 26. Pashley DH. Mechanistic analysis of fluid distribution across the pulpodentin complex. J Endod. 1992;18(2):72-5. 27. Ruch JV. Odontoblast differentiation and the formation of the odontoblast layer. J Dent Res. 1985;64 Spec No:489-98. 28. Sigal MJ, Pitaru S, Aubin JE, Ten Cate AR. A combined scanning electron microscopy and immunofluorescence study demonstrating that the odontoblast process extends to the dentinoenamel junction in human teeth. Anat Rec. 1984;210(3):453-62. 29. Takahashi K. Changes in the pulpal vasculature during inflammation. J Endod. 1990;16(2):92-7. 30. Takahashi K, Kishi Y, Kim S. A scanning electron microscope study of the blood vessels of dog pulp using corrosion resin casts. J Endod. 1982;8(3):131-5. 31. Torneck CD. Changes in the fine structure of the human dental pulp subsequent to carious exposure. J Oral Pathol. 1977;6(2):82-95. 4 32. Tranasi M, Sberna MT, Zizzari V, D'Apolito G, Mastrangelo F, Salini L, et al. Microarray evaluation of age-related changes in human dental pulp. J Endod. 2009;35(9):1211-7. 33. Tziafas D. Mechanisms controlling secondary initiation of dentinogenesis: a review. Int Endod J. 1994;27(2):61-74. 34. Wakisaka S. Neuropeptides in the dental pulp: distribution, origins, and correlation. J Endod. 1990;16(2):67-9. 3. Endo microbiology (related to caries & pulp-periapical tissue diseases) 1. Baumgartner JC, Watts CM, Xia T. Occurrence of Candida albicans in infections of endodontic origin. J Endod. 2000; 26(12): 695-8. 2. Baumgartner JC. Microbiological and molecular analysis of endodontic infections. Endod Topics. 2004; 7(1): 35-51. 3. Bergenholtz G. Micro-organisms from necrotic pulp of traumatized teeth. Odontol Revy. 1974; 25(4): 347-58. 4. Chavez de Paz LE. Redefining the persistent infection in root canals: possible role of biofilm communities. J Endod. 2007; 33(6): 652-62. 5. Costerton J, Stewart PS, Greenberg EP. Bacterial biofilm: A common cause of persistent infections. Science. 1999;284:1318–22. 6. Duggan JM, Sedgley CM. Biofilm formation of oral and endodontic Enterococcus faecalis. J Endod. 2007; 33(7): 815-8. 7. Fabricius L, Dahlen G, Holm SE, Moller AJ. Influence of combinations of oral bacteria on periapical tissues of monkeys. Scand J Dent Res. 1982; 90(3): 200-6. 8. Fabricius L, Dahlen G, Ohman AE, Moller AJ. Predominant indigenous oral bacteria isolated from infected root canals after varied times of closure. Scand J Dent Res. 1982; 90(2): 134-44. 5 9. Fouad AF. Endodontic Microbiology and Pathobiology: Current State of Knowledge. Dent Clin North Am. 2017; 61(1): 1-15. 10. Griffee MB, Patterson SS, Miller CH, Kafrawy AH, Newton CW. The relationship of Bacteroides melaninogenicus to symptoms associated with pulpal necrosis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1980; 50(5): 457-61. 11. Haapasalo M, Ranta H, Ranta K, Shah H. Black-pigmented Bacteroides spp. in human apical periodontitis. Infect Immun. Jul 1986; 53(1):149-53. 12. Haapasalo M, Udnæs T, Endal U. Persistent, recurrent, and acquired infection of the root canal system post-treatment. Endod Topics. 2003; 6(1): 29-56. 13. Hahn CL, Liewehr FR. Update on the adaptive immune responses of the dental pulp. J Endod. Jul 2007; 33(7):773-81. 14. José F. Siqueira Jr, PhD, and Isabela N. Rôças, PhD . Clinical Implications and Microbiology of Bacterial Persistence after Treatment Procedures. J Endod. Jan 2008; 34(11):1291. 15. Kakehashi S, Stanley HR, Fitzgerald RJ. The Effects of Surgical Exposures of Dental Pulps in Germ-Free and Conventional Laboratory Rats. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1965; 20: 340-9. 16. Khemaleelakul S, Baumgartner JC, Pruksakom S. Autoaggregation and coaggregation of bacteria associated with acute endodontic infections. J Endod. Apr 2006; 32(4):312-8. 17. Love RM. Enterococcus faecalis--a mechanism for its role in endodontic failure. Int Endod J. Jul 2001; 34(5):399-405. 18. Molander A, Reit C, Dahlen G, Kvist T. Microbiological status of root-filled teeth with apical periodontitis. Int Endod J. 1998; 31(1): 1-7. 19. Moller AJ, Fabricius L, Dahlen G, Ohman AE, Heyden G. Influence on periapical tissues of indigenous oral bacteria and necrotic pulp tissue in monkeys. Scand J Dent Res. Dec 1981; 89(6):475-84. 20. Montagner F, Jacinto RC, Signoretti FG, Gomes BP. Treponema species detected in infected root canals and acute apical abscess exudates. J Endod. Nov 2010; 36(11):1796-9. 6 21. Portenier I, Waltimo TMT, Haapasalo M. Enterococcus faecalis– the root canal survivor and ‘star’ in post-treatment disease. Endod Topics. 2003; 6(1): 135-59. 22. Ricucci D, Siqueira JF Jr, Bate AL, Pitt Ford TR. Histologic investigation of root canal-treated teeth with apical periodontitis: a retrospective study from twenty-four patients. J Endod. Apr 2009; 35(4):493-502. 23. Ricucci D, Siqueira JF Jr. Biofilms and apical periodontitis: study of prevalence and association with clinical and histopathologic findings. J Endod. Aug 2010; 36(8):1277-88. 24. Schein B, Schilder H. Endotoxin content in endodontically involved teeth. J Endod. 1975; 1(1): 19-21. 25. Sedgley C, Nagel A, Dahlen G, Reit C, Molander A. Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction and culture analyses of enterococcus faecalis in root canals. J Endod. Mar 2006; 32(3):173-7. 26. Seltzer S, Farber PA. Microbiologic factors in endodontology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. Nov 1994; 78(5):634-45. 27. Siqueira JF Jr, Rocas IN, Souto R, de Uzeda M, Colombo AP.
Recommended publications
  • Combination of Bone Allograft, Barrier Membrane and Doxycycline in the Treatment of Infrabony Periodontal Defects: a Comparative Trial
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector The Saudi Dental Journal (2015) 27, 155–160 King Saud University The Saudi Dental Journal www.ksu.edu.sa www.sciencedirect.com ORIGINAL ARTICLE Combination of bone allograft, barrier membrane and doxycycline in the treatment of infrabony periodontal defects: A comparative trial Ashish Agarwal a,*, N.D. Gupta b a Department of Periodontics, Institute of Dental Sciences, Bareilly, India b Department of Periodontics, DR. Z.A. Dental College, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, India Received 1 March 2014; revised 4 December 2014; accepted 26 January 2015 Available online 27 May 2015 KEYWORDS Abstract Aim: The purpose of the present study was to compare the regenerative potential of Bone grafting; noncontained periodontal infrabony defects treated with decalcified freeze-dried bone allograft Doxycycline; (DFDBA) and barrier membrane with or without local doxycycline. Guided tissue regeneration Methods: This study included 48 one- or two-wall infrabony defects from 24 patients (age: 30–65 years) seeking treatment for chronic periodontitis. Defects were randomly divided into two groups and were treated with a combination of DFDBA and barrier membrane, either alone (combined treatment group) or with local doxycycline (combined treatment + doxycycline group). At baseline (before surgery) and 3 and 6 months after surgery, the pocket probing depth (PPD), clinical attachment level (CAL), radiological bone fill (RBF), and alveolar height reduction (AHR) were recorded. Analysis of variance and the Newman–Keuls post hoc test were used for sta- tistical analysis. A two-tailed p-value of less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
    [Show full text]
  • Modifications of Polymeric Membranes Used in Guided Tissue and Bone Regeneration
    polymers Review Modifications of Polymeric Membranes Used in Guided Tissue and Bone Regeneration Wojciech Florjanski 1 , Sylwia Orzeszek 1, Anna Olchowy 1, Natalia Grychowska 2, Wlodzimierz Wieckiewicz 2, Andrzej Malysa 1, Joanna Smardz 1 and Mieszko Wieckiewicz 1,* 1 Department of Experimental Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-367 Wroclaw, Poland; wojtek.fl[email protected] (W.F.); [email protected] (S.O.); [email protected] (A.O.); [email protected] (A.M.); [email protected] (J.S.) 2 Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-367 Wroclaw, Poland; [email protected] (N.G.); [email protected] (W.W.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 14 March 2019; Accepted: 28 April 2019; Published: 2 May 2019 Abstract: Guided tissue/bone regeneration (GTR/GBR) is a widely used procedure in contemporary dentistry. To achieve the required results of tissue regeneration, soft tissues that reproduce quickly are separated from the slow-growing bone tissue by membranes. Many types of membranes are currently in use, but none of them fulfil all of the desired features. To address this issue, further research on developing new membranes with better separation characteristics, such as membrane modification, is needed. Many of the current innovative modified materials are still in the phase of in vitro and experimental studies. A collective review on new trends in membrane modification to GTR/GBR is needed due to the widespread use of polymeric membranes and the constant development in the field of dentistry. Therefore, the aim of this review was to present an overview of polymeric membrane modifications to the GTR/GBR reported in the literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Iowa Section of the American Association for Dental Research
    Iowa Section of the American Association for Dental Research 67th Annual Meeting Moving Oral Health Research Forward Through Collaboration Our Keynote Speaker — Dr. Mary L. Marazita is professor and vice chair of the Department of Oral Biology in the University of Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine and the Director of the Center for Craniofacial and Den- tal Genetics. With over 400 publications and almost 35 years of continuous NIH-funding, Dr. Marazita is a world leader in the use of statistical genetics and genetic epidemiology for understanding craniofacial birth defects and oral-facial development. In 1980, Dr. Marazita earned a Ph.D. in Genetics from the University of North Carolina, and in 1982, she completed post-doctoral train- ing in craniofacial biology at the University of Southern California. Before coming to Pittsburg, Dr. Marazita had faculty appointments at UCLA and the Medical College of Virginia. She is also a diplo- mate of the American Board of Medical Genetics and a Founding Fellow of the American College of Medical Genetics. At the University of Pittsburgh, Dr. Marazita has held numerous other appointments in the School of Dental Medicine, including assistant dean, associate dean for research, head of the Division of Mary L Marazita, Ph.D. Oral Biology, and chair of the Department of Oral Biology. Given her international reputation and commitment to the oral sci- ences, Dr. Marazita has held important roles in the National Institutes of Health (NIH), including the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR), and the National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI). Dr. Marazita exemplifies the collaborative nature of scientific research, and embodies the theme of this conference.
    [Show full text]
  • Peri-Implantitis Regenerative Therapy: a Review
    biology Review Peri-Implantitis Regenerative Therapy: A Review Lorenzo Mordini 1,* , Ningyuan Sun 1, Naiwen Chang 1, John-Paul De Guzman 1, Luigi Generali 2 and Ugo Consolo 2 1 Department of Periodontology, Tufts University School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA 02111, USA; [email protected] (N.S.); [email protected] (N.C.); [email protected] (J.-P.D.G.) 2 Department of Surgery, Medicine, Dentistry and Morphological Sciences with Transplant Surgery, Oncology and Regenerative Medicine Relevance (CHIMOMO), University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124 Modena, Italy; [email protected] (L.G.); [email protected] (U.C.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Simple Summary: Regenerative therapies are one of the options to treat peri-implantitis diseases that cause peri-implant bone loss. This review reports classic and current literature to describe the available knowledge on regenerative peri-implant techniques. Abstract: The surgical techniques available to clinicians to treat peri-implant diseases can be divided into resective and regenerative. Peri-implant diseases are inflammatory conditions affecting the soft and hard tissues around dental implants. Despite the large number of investigations aimed at identifying the best approach to treat these conditions, there is still no universally recognized protocol to solve these complications successfully and predictably. This review will focus on the regenerative treatment of peri-implant osseous defects in order to provide some evidence that can aid clinicians in the approach to peri-implant disease treatment. Keywords: peri-implant disease; peri-implant mucositis; peri-implantitis; re-osseointegration; regen- Citation: Mordini, L.; Sun, N.; Chang, erative therapy N.; De Guzman, J.-P.; Generali, L.; Consolo, U.
    [Show full text]
  • Treatment of Different Types of Bone Defects with Concentrated Growth Factor
    Gökmenoğlu et al. Int J Oral Dent Health 2016, 2:029 International Journal of Volume 2 | Issue 2 ISSN: 2469-5734 Oral and Dental Health Case Series: Open Access Treatment of Different Types of Bone Defects with Concentrated Growth Factor: Four Case Reports Ceren Gökmenoğlu1, Mustafa Cihan Yavuz1, Elif Sadik2, Varol Çanakçi1 and Cankat Kara1* 1Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Ordu University, Ordu, Turkey 2Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Ordu University, Ordu, Turkey *Corresponding author: Cankat KARA, DDS, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Ordu University, 52100 Ordu, Turkey, Tel: +90 452 212 1283, Email: [email protected] barrier to epithelium migration [4]. The purpose of these case series Abstract is to document the beneficial role of CGF mixed with bone graft and Various techniques have been attempted in the past to truly CGF barrier membrane to accelerate bone formation in the healing of regenerate the lost bone structures. Owing to its stimulatory effect different bone defect areas. on angiogenesis and epithelialization, concentrated growth factor (CGF) is an excellent material for enhancing bone healing. The Cases Report purpose of these case series is to document the beneficial role of CGF in the healing of different bone defect areas. This report This report describes four female patients presented with (lateral describes four female patients presented with (lateral cyst on cyst on tooth 22; periimplantitis on mandibular left first premolar tooth 22; periimplantitis on mandibular left first premolar area; area; furcation lesion on tooth 36, periapical abcess on teeth 11-21) furcation lesion on tooth 36, periapical abcess on teeth 11-21).
    [Show full text]
  • Bioresorbable Collagen Membranes for Guided Bone Regeneration
    6 Bioresorbable Collagen Membranes for Guided Bone Regeneration Haim Tal, Ofer Moses, Avital Kozlovsky and Carlos Nemcovsky Department of Periodontology and Implantology, Tel Aviv University Israel 1. Introduction Localized lack of bone volume in the jaws may be due to congenital, post-traumatic, postsurgical defects or different disease processes. Increasing the bone volume has long been an attractive field of basic and clinical research. The introduction of implant therapy, and the proven relationship between long-term prognosis of dental implants and adequate bone volume at the implant site (Lekholm et al. 1986), dramatically increased the interest of both clinicians and scientists in this field, making augmentation procedures an important part of contemporary implant therapy. Basically, four methods have been described to augment bone volume: a. osteoinduction, using appropriate growth factors (Reddi 1981; Urist 1965); b. osteoconduction, using grafting materials that serve as scaffolds for new bone growth (Buch et al. 1986; Reddi et al. 1987); c. distraction osteogenesis, by which a surgically induced bone fracture enables slow controlled pulling apart of the separated bone fragments (Ilizarov 1989a,b); d. guided bone regeneration, which allows selective bone tissue growth into a space maintained by tissue barriers (Dahlin et al. 1988, 1991a; Kostopoulos & Karring 1994; Nyman & Lang 1994). Among the different methods, guided bone regeneration (GBR) is the most popular and best documented for the treatment of localized bone defects in the jaws, probably due to its relative simplicity of use while allowing the placement of endosseous implants in areas of the jaw with bony defects and/or insufficient bone volume. Highly predictable success rates can be achieved using GBR; in fact, it has been shown that success rates of implants placed at GBR treated sites and sites without bone augmentation are comparable (Hammerle et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Straumann® Emdogain® ENAMEL MATRIX DERIVATIVE
    Product Information Biomaterials@Straumann® Because one option is not enough. Straumann® Emdogain® ENAMEL MATRIX DERIVATIVE 490.280_Emdogain-flyer-4-pager.indd 1 08/01/2018 16:49 Straumann® Emdogain® Emdogain® is a unique protein mix which influences Prof. Dr. David Cochran, a number of different cells and different processes. It Implantologist, « San Antonio/USA really helps the wound healing and wound closure in the oral cavity. « WHY USE STRAUMANN® EMDOGAIN®? Emdogain® induces true regeneration By modulating the wound healing process, Emdogain® induces the regeneration of a functional attachment in periodontal procedures (as evidenced by human histological data¹,²) Emdogain® improves wound healing By promoting angiogenesis³,⁴, modulating the production of factors in oral surgical procedures related to inflammation⁵ and thanks to its anti-microbial effect toward oral pathogens⁶, Emdogain® accelerates the wound healing process of oral surgical procedures⁷ Emdogain® increased the predictability Emdogain® leads to: of your periodontal procedures - significantly improved clinical parameters in intra-osseous defects compared to open flap debridement procedures alone⁸ - increased root coverage achieved when used in a coronally advanced flap (CAF) compared to CAF alone⁹, and leads to results comparable to CAF + Connective Tissue Graft¹⁰ Emdogain® helps you achieve patient - When used to treat intra-osseous defects, Emdogain® contributes satisfaction to improve your patients’ dental prognosis. - When used in oral surgical procedures in general, Emdogain® accelerates wound closure¹¹, and reduces post surgical pain and swelling¹². - When used in periodontal plastic procedures around teeth and implants, Emdogain® may improve the esthetics of the results thanks to improved wound healing. Emdogain® is easy to apply Because Emdogain® is a gel, it requires no trimming and is easy to apply, even in defects difficult to access.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodental Engineering V
    BIODENTAL ENGINEERING V PROCEEDINGS OF THE 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIODENTAL ENGINEERING, PORTO, PORTUGAL, 22–23 JUNE 2018 Biodental Engineering V Editors J. Belinha Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Porto, Portugal R.M. Natal Jorge, J.C. Reis Campos, Mário A.P. Vaz & João Manuel R.S. Tavares Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal CRC Press/Balkema is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business © 2019 Taylor & Francis Group, London, UK Typeset by V Publishing Solutions Pvt Ltd., Chennai, India All rights reserved. No part of this publication or the information contained herein may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, by photocopying, recording or otherwise, without written prior permission from the publisher. Although all care is taken to ensure integrity and the quality of this publication and the information herein, no responsibility is assumed by the publishers nor the author for any damage to the property or persons as a result of operation or use of this publication and/or the information contained herein. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: International Conference on Biodental Engineering (5th: 2018: Porto, Portugal), author. | Belinha, Jorge, editor. | Jorge, Renato M. Natal editor. | Campos, J.C. Reis, editor. | Vaz, Mario A.P., editor. | Tavares, Joao Manuel R.S., editor. Title: Biodental engineering V: proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Biodental Engineering, Porto, Portugal, 22–23 June 2018 / editors, J. Belinha, R.M. Natal Jorge, J.C. Reis Campos, Mario A.P. Vaz & Joao Manuel R.S. Tavares. Description: London, UK; Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis Group, [2019] | Includes bibliographical references and index.
    [Show full text]
  • Clinical and Experimental Studies of Bone Substitutes and Dental Implants in Compromised Bone Sites
    Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Medicine 1515 Clinical and experimental studies of bone substitutes and dental implants in compromised bone sites AMELA TRBAKOVIC ACTA UNIVERSITATIS UPSALIENSIS ISSN 1651-6206 ISBN 978-91-513-0501-1 UPPSALA urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-364437 2018 Dissertation presented at Uppsala University to be publicly examined in Skoogsalen, Ing. 78/79, Akademiska sjukhuset, Uppsala, Friday, 14 December 2018 at 09:15 for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Faculty of Medicine). The examination will be conducted in Swedish. Faculty examiner: Professor Christer Dahlin (Göteborgs Universitet, Avd för biomaterialvetenskap). Abstract Trbakovic, A. 2018. Clinical and experimental studies of bone substitutes and dental implants in compromised bone sites. Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Medicine 1515. 82 pp. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. ISBN 978-91-513-0501-1. Background: With an ageing population, an increase of more challenging implant treatments is expected. In this thesis, we evaluate the outcome of two faster implant protocols, in patients with compromised alveolar bone. We examine the bone integrating abilities of two new synthetic bone substitute materials and in another paper, we discuss the effects of nonsteroidal anti- inflammatory drugs (NSAID) on bone healing. Aim: In paper I we investigate implant survival and effect of reduced implant-tooth distance. In paper II we evaluate the long-term implant survival and function of immediately loaded implants. In paper III & IV, we analyse if added NSAID reduce postoperative pain and if it has a reduced effect on new bone formation in a rabbit sinus lift model.
    [Show full text]
  • Emdogain) and Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft for Root Coverage in Patients with Multiple Gingival Recession Defects: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Study
    QUINTESSENCE INTERNATIONAL PERIODONTOLOGY Angeliki Alexiou Comparison of enamel matrix derivative (Emdogain) and subepithelial connective tissue graft for root coverage in patients with multiple gingival recession defects: A randomized controlled clinical study Angeliki Alexiou, DDS, MSc1/Ioannis Vouros, Dr med dent2/Georgios Menexes, BMath, MA, PhD3/Antonis Konstantinidis, Prof DMD, MSc, PhD4 Objective: The purpose of the present study was to compare list. Data were analyzed within the frame of Mixed Linear the clinical efficiency of enamel matrix derivative (EMD) placed Models with the ANOVA method. Results: There were no sta- under a coronally advanced flap (CAF; test group), to a connec- tistically significantly differences observed between test and tive tissue graft (CTG) placed under a CAF (control group), in control groups in regards with the depth of buccal recession patients with multiple recession defects. Method and with a mean REC of 1.82 mm (CTG) and 1.72 mm (EMD) re- Materials: Twelve patients with multiple Miller’s Class I or II spectively. Similarly the mean PPD value was 1.3 mm for both gingival recessions in contralateral quadrants of the maxilla groups at T6, while the respective value for CAL was 1.7 mm were selected. The primary outcome variable was the change (EMD) and 1.8 mm (CTG). Statistically significant differences in depth of the buccal recession (REC), at 6 months (T6) after were observed only for the WKT, which were 3.0 mm and surgery. The secondary outcome parameters included the clin- 3.6 mm for the test and control groups respectively (P < .001) ical attachment level (CAL), the probing pocket depth (PPD), at T6.
    [Show full text]
  • Current and Future Trends in Periodontal Tissue Engineering and Bone Regeneration
    Galli et al. Plast Aesthet Res 2021;8:3 Plastic and DOI: 10.20517/2347-9264.2020.176 Aesthetic Research Review Open Access Current and future trends in periodontal tissue engineering and bone regeneration Matthew Galli1, Yao Yao1, William V. Giannobile1,2,3, Hom-Lay Wang1 1Department of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, University of Michigan School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA. 2Biointerfaces Institute, North Campus Research Complex, University of Michigan School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA. 3Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA 02115, USA. Correspondence to: Prof. Hom-Lay Wang, Department of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, University of Michigan School of Dentistry, 1011 North University Avenue, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA. E-mail: [email protected] How to cite this article: Galli M, Yao Y, Giannobile WV, Wang HL. Current and future trends in periodontal tissue engineering and bone regeneration. Plast Aesthet Res 2021;8:3. http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2020.176 Received: 31 Aug 2020 First Decision: 16 Nov 2020 Revised: 28 Nov 2020 Accepted: 7 Dec 2020 Published: 8 Jan 2021 Academic Editor: Filippo Citterio, Raúl González-García Copy Editor: Cai-Hong Wang Production Editor: Jing Yu Abstract Periodontal tissue engineering involves a multi-disciplinary approach towards the regeneration of periodontal ligament, cementum and alveolar bone surrounding teeth, whereas bone regeneration specifically applies to ridge reconstruction in preparation for future implant placement, sinus floor augmentation and regeneration of peri- implant osseous defects. Successful periodontal regeneration is based on verifiable cementogenesis on the root surface, oblique insertion of periodontal ligament fibers and formation of new and vital supporting bone.
    [Show full text]
  • Surgical Periodontics: Regenerative Procedures – Dental Clinical Policy
    UnitedHealthcare® Dental Clinical Policy Surgical Periodontics: Regenerative Procedures Policy Number: DCP014.08 Effective Date: April 1, 2021 Instructions for Use Table of Contents Page Related Dental Policies Coverage Rationale ....................................................................... 1 • Dental Barrier Membrane Guided Tissue Definitions ...................................................................................... 2 Regeneration Applicable Codes .......................................................................... 3 • Full Mouth Debridement Description of Services ................................................................. 3 • Implants Clinical Evidence ........................................................................... 4 • Non-Surgical Periodontal Therapy U.S. Food and Drug Administration ............................................. 9 References ..................................................................................... 9 • Provisional Splinting Policy History/Revision Information ........................................... 11 • Surgical Endodontics Instructions for Use ..................................................................... 11 • Surgical Periodontics: Mucogingival Procedures • Surgical Periodontics: Resective Procedures Coverage Rationale Bone Replacement Grafts for Retained Natural Teeth Bone Replacement Grafts for retained natural teeth are indicated for the following: Infrabony/Intrabony vertical defects Class II Furcation involvements Bone Replacement Grafts for
    [Show full text]