City Commission Work Session Agenda Packet (PDF

City of Hays Office of the City Manager

Memo

To: City Commission From: Toby Dougherty, City Manager Date: 2-23-2021 Re: March 4, 2021 Work Session

Please find the attached agenda and supporting documentation for the March 4, 2021 Work Session.

Item 2 – First Call for Help – Request for Funding

The City Commission has received a request for funding from First Call for Help for the construction of temporary housing units. Further information is provided in this packet.

Items 3 & 4 – Big Creek Estates Second Addition Rezoning from Agriculture “A-L” to Residential General District “R-G” and Final Plat Approval

Items “3” and “4” are both related to the Big Creek Estates Second Addition. Item “3” is the rezoning, and item “4” is the plat. City staff sees no issues with either request and recommends approval.

Item 5 – 2021 Street Maintenance Program – Award of Bid

Please refer to the attached memorandum from Jesse Rohr, Director of Public Works, regarding the 2021 Street Maintenance Projects. City staff looks forward to another productive street maintenance season.

CITY OF HAYS CITY COMMISSION WORK SESSION CITY HALL, 1507 MAIN STREET, HAYS, KS THURSDAY, MARCH 4, 2021 – 6:30 P.M. AGENDA

1. February 18, 2021 Work Session Notes (PAGE 1) Department Head Responsible: Kim Rupp, Director of Finance

2. First Call for Help – Request for Funding (PAGE 9) Person Responsible: Linda Mills, First Call for Help Executive Director

3. Big Creek Estates Second Addition Rezoning from Agriculture “A-L” to Residential General District “R-G” (PAGE 21) Department Head Responsible: Jesse Rohr, Director of Public Works

4. Big Creek Estates Second Addition Final Plat Approval (PAGE 37) Department Head Responsible: Jesse Rohr, Director of Public Works

5. 2021 Street Maintenance Program – Award of Bid (PAGE 57) Department Head Responsible: Jesse Rohr, Director of Public Works

6. Other Items for Discussion

7. Executive Session (if required)

8. Adjournment

ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY NEEDING SPECIAL ACCOMMODATIONS TO ATTEND THIS MEETING SHOULD CONTACT THE CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULED MEETING TIME. EVERY ATTEMPT WILL BE MADE TO ACCOMMODATE ANY REQUESTS FOR ASSISTANCE.

City of Hays City Commission Work Session Notes Thursday, February 18, 2021 – 6:30 p.m.

Present: Sandy Jacobs, Mason Ruder, Michael Berges, Ron Mellick, Shaun Musil, Toby Dougherty, Kim Rupp, and John T. Bird

January 21, 2021 Work Session Notes There were no corrections or additions to the minutes of the work session held on January 21, 2021; the minutes stand approved as presented.

North Central Kansas Technical College – Big Creek Technical Training Center Annual Report Eric Burks, NCK Tech President, presented the 2021 Annual Report summarizing the activities at the Big Creek Technical Training Center housed at 101 Main Street. Annual reporting is a requirement of their contract with the City of Hays for their utilization of space at the former Army Reserve facility, which is owned by the City. NCK Tech’s utilization of the Big Creek Technical Training Center has provided space to deliver training in the areas of carpentry, electrical technology, and plumbing, heating and air-conditioning (PHAC) for students in the Hays region. Many area businesses serve on the advisory committees for these programs to ensure appropriate training is provided to meet industry needs. All of the instructors of these programs are licensed under the Hays City codes for their instructional areas. NCK Tech maintains the building’s interior and mechanical condition. Mr. Burks reviewed the maintenance and improvements that have been done to the building. He also reviewed some of the projects that were done for the City of Hays during the past year.

1 Mr. Burks noted when the college began, a main objective was to bring and keep youth in our area and he feels they have been successful in doing that. He clarified that they are a fully accredited college since 1996. They serve an average of 1,200 students a year at their two campuses in Beloit and Hays. Mr. Burks explained that the carpentry program had to take a hard pivot this year due to COVID-19, CDC guidelines, and State mandates in regard to the annual house project. The 2020 house project came to a halt in March of 2020 and was sold “as-is” at the annual house auction in May 2020. With the consent of the City, NCK Tech is building a 1,500 square foot single-family home on the Hays campus. Although this project is not directly for the City of Hays, last year’s house sold for $124,000 generating $10,230 in sales taxes. It also represented over $97,000 worth of building materials purchased from Hays area businesses. Mr. Burks stated as a result of the partnership, since 2009 NCK Tech has trained 513 students in carpentry, electrical technology, and plumbing, heating and air-conditioning. Of the 38 full-time Hays program graduates from May 2019, 83% are employed in their related fields, 13% are enrolled in current programs at the college, and 4% are employed in unrelated jobs Mr. Burks thanked the City for their support and partnership. Mayor Jacobs stated she appreciates the collaboration with the City of Hays as well as Fort Hays State University and hopes it continues for years to come.

Resolution Authorizing the Offering for Sale of General Obligation Bonds, Series 2021-A Kim Rupp, Director of Finance, stated City staff, City Financial Advisor, Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, and City Bond Counsel, Gilmore Bell, have been working on documentation in preparation for the sale of General Obligation (GO) Bonds, Series 2021-A. This issue is to reimburse expenditures in connection with the North Vine Street Corridor Project. The City’s share of the North Vine Street Corridor project costs were initially paid to Kansas Department of Transportation (KDOT) in May 2020 from available Capital Projects funds. Using those funds and the BUILD Grant, KDOT

2 has been paying project costs as incurred. After construction, KDOT will audit the project and credit or bill the City for any change orders or variations in cost. Also in May 2020 the City Commission passed Ordinance No. 3982 designating certain City streets as main trafficways, as the first step in authorizing the North Vine Street Corridor Project for GO bond financing under Kansas law. The second step of the process set forth in Kansas law involves adopting a resolution authorizing GO bond financing for the project. The resolution authorizes the Financial Advisor, Bond Counsel, in conjunction with the Finance Director, to proceed with the preparation and distribution of a preliminary official statement and notice of bond sale, and all other preliminary action necessary to sell the GO bonds. Mr. Rupp stated the total par amount of the bond issuance is estimated to be $6,795,000. This reimburses the City for its share of the project as well as covers the paying agent, Kansas Attorney General, CUSIP Service Bureau, Bond Counsel, Financial Advisor, the rating agency, and publication and printing. True interest cost is estimated to be 1.77%, which is subject to change based on market conditions on the date of sale with an estimated debt service of $338,553 beginning in 2022 to be paid from the additional 2% Transient Guest Tax (TGT) that went into effect on October 1, 2018. City Financial Advisor, David Arteberry, with Stifel, Nicolus & Company, joined the meeting by phone. Mr. Arteberry presented information regarding the bond sale process. He explained what is involved in preparing for the bond sale as well as what actually occurs on the sale date. He also provided information on the state of the bond market. Commissioner Berges had additional questions regarding the Standard & Poor’s (S&P) Rating, coupon rates, the term, and use of a sinking fund. At the February 25, 2021 Commission meeting, Commissioners will be asked to approve the Resolution authorizing the offering for sale of General Obligation Bonds, Series 2021-A.

3 Bickle-Schmidt Sports Complex Shade Structures – Award of Bid Jeff Boyle, Director of Parks, reported that City staff prepared a Request for Proposal (RFP) for new shade structures at the Bickle-Schmidt Sports Complex as directed by the Hays City Commission. Mr. Boyle noted that not enough shade is the number one complaint about the Bickle-Schmidt Sports Complex.

The new shade structures would be located behind each backstop on all eight fields, and would provide approximately 2,130 square feet of shade per field, which is three times more than the existing structures. Additionally, the proposed design provides a continuous roof over the entire length of the structure which eliminates openings where sun can shine through at varying angles. The proposed structure is wooden framed with a painted metal roof and painted metal ceiling. The sheeted ceiling will ensure that birds do not nest in open cavities above the bleachers and will provide a more aesthetically pleasing experience. Mr. Boyle stated five proposals were received. City staff recommends approval of the low bid from Quality Structures, Inc. for an amount of $451,280. Funding would come from the City’s share of the Ellis County ¼ cent sales tax. Commissioner Musil asked if these structures would stand up to the Kansas weather, he referenced a microburst that did considerable damage at the sports complex. Mr. Boyle stated the new structures are rated to withstand 125 mph winds. He also noted that there are numerous shelters from Quality Structures, Inc. throughout the park system and they have not had a problem with any of them. At the February 25, 2021 Commission meeting, Commissioners will be asked to approve the low bid from Quality Structures, Inc. for the installation of eight shade structures at the Bickle-Schmidt Sports Complex with funding from the Ellis County ¼ cent sales tax for an amount of $451,280.

4 Ordinance Amending the D&J Land and Development Community Improvement District (CID) Start Date and Development Agreement Kim Rupp, Director of Finance, stated on March 2, 2020 the City Clerk received a petition to create the D&J Land and Development CID. On May 14, 2020, the City Commission passed Ordinance No. 3984 authorizing the projects described in the petition, creating the D&J Land and Development CID, and imposing a 2.0% CID sales tax to commence on April 1, 2021. Also on May 14, 2020, the City Commission entered into a development agreement with D&J Land and Development, LLC. The development agreement also defined the CID term as commencing on April 1, 2021. KSA 12-6a26 authorizes the City Commission to create CIDs to finance projects within defined areas of the City and to levy a CID sales tax on the property for a period not to exceed 22 years. Given the start date of the D&J Land and Development CID was well defined as April 1, 2021 in the ordinance and the development agreement, statute requires the clock begin on that date. Following the passage of Ordinance No. 3984 and the development agreement, the developer realized the 22 year clock on the approved CID would begin prior to their project completion. Therefore, to maximize the full revenue potential from the CID, D&J Land and Development, LLC has requested the ordinance and development agreement be amended to reflect a new CID start date of October 1, 2021. This has been done for one other CID in the past and does not present any other legal or financial considerations. City staff recommends passage of the ordinance as it will maximize the revenue potential of the CID as initially intended by the City Commission. Commissioner Mellick asked if D&J Land and Development, LLC could request another extension if work delays continue. Mr. Rupp stated it was communicated that this should be the only request. Doug Hutchinson, D&J Land and Development, LLC, reported utility extensions from south of the interstate and running underneath it to the north are about 75% complete and site grading is about 85% complete. He added that despite the delay, he believes the retail tenant side of the project will actually be

5 stronger because of Covid-19. Mr. Hutchinson stated the strong companies have made it, they have cash, and they are looking to expand. At the February 25, 2021 Commission meeting, Commissioners will be asked to approve an ordinance amending Ordinance No. 3984 of the City of Hays, Kansas, to commence a Community Improvement District Sales Tax on October 1, 2021 and approve the first amendment to the development agreement with D&J Land and Development, LLC.

Other items for discussion There were no other items for discussion.

Executive Session Ron Mellick moved, Shaun Musil seconded, that the Governing Body recess to executive session at 7:45 p.m. for 30 minutes to discuss personnel matters. The executive session included the City Commissioners. K.S.A. 75- 4319 authorizes the use of executive session to discuss the topics stated in the motion. Vote: Ayes: Sandy Jacobs Mason Ruder Michael Berges Ron Mellick Shaun Musil No action was taken during the executive session. Ron Mellick moved, Mason Ruder seconded, that the Governing Body recess to a second executive session at 8:15 p.m. for 5 minutes to discuss personnel matters. The executive session included the City Commissioners. K.S.A. 75-4319 authorizes the use of executive session to discuss the topics stated in the motion.

6 Vote: Ayes: Sandy Jacobs Mason Ruder Michael Berges Ron Mellick Shaun Musil No action was taken during the executive session.

The work session was adjourned at 8:20 p.m.

Submitted by: ______Brenda Kitchen – City Clerk

7 8 Commission Work Session Agenda Memo

From: Toby Dougherty, City Manager

Work Session: March 4, 2021

Subject: First Call for Help – Request for Funding

Person(s) Responsible: Linda Mills, First Call for Help Executive Director

Summary The City Commission is in receipt of a request for funding from First Call for Help of Ellis County. The request is for $30,000 and would go toward the construction of six temporary housing units.

Background First Call for Help has been working on a project that it terms “First Step Housing” which will provide temporary housing for up to six months for segments of the population who are able to work and are committed to creating stability in their lives. First Call for Help has raised funds for the $227,000 project from various sources. It was recently in receipt of a Schmidt Foundation matching grant for up to $50,000.

Financial Consideration To complete the project, First Call for Help is requesting $30,000 from the City of Hays. Should the City Commission choose to entertain the request, the funds would need to come from the Commission Capital Reserve as we do not have a budget allocation to absorb a $30,000 nonplanned expenditure.

Legal Consideration There are no known legal obstacles to proceeding as recommended by City Staff.

Supporting Documentation Letter from First Call for Help Drawing of the First Step Housing Addition

9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Commission Work Session Agenda Memo

From: Curtis W. Deines, PIE Superintendent

Work Session: March 4, 2021

Subject: Big Creek Estates Second Addition Rezoning from Agriculture “A-L” to Residential General District “R-G”

Person(s) Responsible: Jesse Rohr, Director of Public Works

Summary An application has been submitted by Adam Pray to request a change in zoning from “A- L” Agriculture to “R-G” Residential General District for a tract of land on the east side of Big Creek Estates, for the proposed Big Creek Estates Second Addition. This property has been grassland for many years. This request to change zoning is logical and consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Staff as well as the Hays Area Planning Commission recommends approving the rezoning request from “A-L” to “R-G”.

Background This property has been grassland for many years. The Big Creek Estates development was platted in 2004 and is nearly built out. The area being rezoned is directly abutting the east side of Big Creek Estates and will blend in with the original development as if it was part of the original plat.

Discussion Developer Adam Pray has submitted an application to request a change in zoning from “A-L” Agriculture to “R-G” Residential General District for a tract of land on the east side of Big Creek Estates, also known as the Big Creek Estates Second Addition. The developer will have to extend sanitary sewer to these lots (Big Creek Sewer District). Each property will have their own private water well. Ellis County Environmental office has been involved to evaluate the properties for water and support the use. This area is identified as Agriculture Production (AP) on the Future Land Use Map and is adjacent to Light Density Residential (LDR). This request conforms to the Comprehensive Plan and is compatible with the area. This rezoning request is logical and continues the residential character of the neighborhood. Land uses allowed in the R-G District are as follows:

21 “R-G” Zoning allows the following uses by right (UDC 2.2.202):

o Single Family Detached o Transportation Stop o Schools, Private o Public Utilities o Schools, Public

Limited or Special Uses for “R-G” Zoning:

o Limited Approval o Assisted Living o Manufactured Home o Library o Modular Home o Place of Public Assembly o Child Care Facility, Home, Group, and Youth o Recreation & Fitness, Outdoor Residential

o Special Use Approval: o Cemetery or Mausoleum o Manufactured Home Park or Subdivision o Funeral Home/Mortuary Group Day Care Center o Government and Public o Institutions o Substation (electrical and telephone

Legal Consideration There are no known legal obstacles to proceeding as recommended by City Staff.

Financial Consideration This proposed development has no known financial impact on the City of Hays.

Options The City Commission has the following options: • Approve the rezoning request from “A-L” to “R-G” as recommended by the Planning Commission and City Staff. • Send the request back to the Planning Commission for further consideration with specific basis for further review. • Deny the rezoning request from “A-L” to “R-G” (Requires a 2/3 majority vote to overturn the P.C. recommendation)

Recommendation Staff as well as the Hays Area Planning Commission recommends approving the rezoning request from “A-L” to “R-G”.

22 Action Requested Approve an Ordinance approving the change in zoning from “A-L” Agriculture to “R-G” Residential General District for a tract of land known as the proposed Big Creek Estates Second Addition.

Supporting Documentation Visuals/Maps Planning Commission Findings of Fact Planning Commission Minutes (Excerpt) Ordinance

25 PLANNING COMMISSION FINDINGS OF FACT

1. CASE NO: 2020-04Z FILING FEE PAID: $200.00

2. DATE FILED: 9-23-2020

3. DATE ADVERTISED FOR HEARING: 10-21-2020 and 10-22-2020

4. PUBLIC HEARING DATE: 11-16-2020

5. APPLICANT’S NAME: Adam Pray

6. LOCATION OF PROPERTY: South East of Hays, East of Big Creek Estates

7. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: Agriculture adjacent to residential

8. PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY: Agriculture grassland

9. PRESENT ZONING: “A-L” Agriculture REQUESTED ZONING: “R-G” Residential General District

1. CHARACTER OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD: DIRECTION

NORTH: Agriculture and Manufactured Home Park

SOUTH: Agriculture

EAST: Agriculture

WEST: Residential Single Family

2. THE ZONING OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY: DIRECTION

NORTH: “NC.5” Manufactured Home Park

SOUTH: “A-L” Agriculture

EAST: “A-L” Agriculture

WEST: “NC.2” Neighborhood Conservation Single Family

3. CONSIDERATION OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF PERMANENT PROFESSIONAL STAFF: This property has been undeveloped and used for agriculture pastureland. The property is located adjacent to “NC.2” zoned properties that

26 will continue with the character of the neighborhood. It is Staff’s recommendation to support the rezoning of this area.

A. DEDICATION OR RESERVATION NEEDED FOR: 1. DRAINAGE: No 2. STREETS: Yes 3. UTILITY EASEMENTS: a. ELECTRICITY: Yes b. GAS: Yes c. SEWERS: Yes d. WATER: No 4. WALKING/MULTI-PURPOSE PATH EASEMENT: No 5. SHOULD PLATTING BE REQUIRED: Yes – In Process

B. TRAFFIC CONDITIONS: 1. CLASSIFICATION OF STREET ON WHICH PROPERTY FRONTS: County Road 2. RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTH: 60’ ROW 3. SIGHT DISTANCE: OK 4. TURNING MOVEMENTS: OK 5. COMMENTS ON TRAFFIC: Local residential traffic

4. THE SUITABILITY OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR THE USES TO WHICH IT HAS BEEN RESTRICTED: The proposed zoning would be suitable for the area.

5. THE EXTENT TO WHICH REMOVAL OF THE RESTRICTIONS WILL DETRIMENTALLY AFFECT NEARBY PROPERTY: Changing the zoning classification from “A-L” to “R-G” will not detrimentally affect nearby property. The properties to the west are currently single family and this would continue within this zoned area.

6. THE LENGTH OF TIME THE SUBJECT PROPERTY HAS REMAINED VACANT AS ZONED: This property has always been agriculture, and this is a great opportunity for development of similar uses nearby.

7. THE RELATIVE GAIN TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY, AND WELFARE BY THE DESTRUCTION OF THE VALUE OF THE NEIGHBORING PROPERTY, AS COMPARED TO THE HARDSHIP IMPOSED ON THE INDIVIDUAL LANDOWNER: Development of this small area is beneficial to the area. More residential will only help sustain the neighborhood and continue to create value for the area.

8. THE CONFORMANCE OF THE REQUESTED CHANGE TO THE ADOPTED OR RECOGNIZED MASTER PLAN BEING UTILIZED BY THE CITY: This property is labeled AP or Agriculture Production on the Future Land Use Map. Adjacent to the west is LDR or Light Density Residential. The request and conforms with the characteristics of the neighborhood. A small extension of single-family homes conforms with the Comprehensive Plan.

27 (Excerpt Minutes) HAYS AREA PLANNING COMMISSION CITY HALL COMMISSION CHAMBERS NOVEMBER 16, 2020 6:30 P.M. Public Hearing for the rezoning request from “A-L” Agriculture to “R-G” Residential General District of a tract of land located east of Big Creek Estates Addition:

Curtis Deines provided a PowerPoint presentation for a request by Adam Pray to change the zoning from “A-L” Agriculture to “R-G” Residential General District to a tract of land on the east side of Big Creek Estates Addition. This property is outside the city limits southeast of Hays, north of Reservation Road. This property has been grassland for many years.

The Big Creek Estates Addition development was platted in 2004 and is nearly built out. This property is directly east of this development and will blend in as if was part of the original plat.

The plat that includes roads, lot sizes and setbacks, easements etc. will be discussed at a future meeting after the Ellis County Commission has had an opportunity to speak on behalf of the proposed addition and its impacts regarding county services.

He provided an image of the current zoning in the area. To the west is NC.2 Neighborhood Conservation District for single family homes. To the north is a mobile home park and to the east is agriculture.

The Future Land Use Map of the Comprehensive Plan identifies this tract of land as Agriculture Production (AP) and is adjacent to Light Density Residential (LDR). This rezoning request is logical and continues with the character of the neighborhood.

The developer will have to extend sanitary sewer (Big Creek Sewer District) to these lots. Each property will have their own private water well. Ellis County Environmental office has been involved to evaluate the properties for water and sewer.

He provided the list of uses permitted by right, limited, and special use for “R-G” zoning district within the United Development Code.

Staff recommends approving the rezoning request as submitted.

He provided the two separate actions requested.

Chairman Paul Phillips informed the audience that because of the Open Meetings Act by Kansas Law, the first part of the hearing would be a public

28 hearing for the rezoning request. He emphasized to keep in mind that this is only a request if the change in zoning is appropriate. It is not about what the developer might do with the property.

He opened the public hearing. He asked if there was anyone in the audience that would like to make a comment.

James Graham, 2217 Clay Drive, came before the commission.

He stated he would provide three reasons why not to change the zoning on this property.

Currently, there are roughly 30 houses in the Big Creek Estates Addition. Each of them is on a half an acre or 6/10th of an acre lot. Each one has their own water well. With the potential of nine houses in this subject area, it is going to increase the water usage by upwards of close to 30 percent. Although this is one of the best aquifers in the Hays general area, Hays is not known for having lots of water. Currently, they have not had issues, although they have been in some relatively wet periods of time. If going back in the situations like 2005, he could see a drawdown of water on their property.

There is also an issue with closed source of contamination. He referenced the aerial image showing a producing oil well on adjoining property that would be in close proximity of some of the potential homes. It is a concern for him and others what would happen if there is a leak or contamination. There is also the potential of contamination of the aquifer from additional sources such as fertilizer on the lawns or from backflow contamination from the residential usage.

The second reason why not to change the zoning on this property is the drainage situation. The base of the property sits below the connecting road that goes between Clay Drive and South View Drive. It drains to the east. Building it up with houses will force more water to the east. The revised Ellis County Flood zone comes very close to these properties. Forcing more water to the east is going to increase the risk of the floodplain to become saturated and overflowing. That will also divert more water to Reservation Road that cannot withstand a moderate rainfall before it washes out. He stated that the road was washed out and closed more than 4 times in the year 2019.

The third reason is the road situation. The roads were built by Doug Shaw for the use of the Big Creek Estates. They are sand based roads. They are not gravel and clay packed like many county roads in Ellis County. They do not withstand the current traffic. The County only has the resources to maintain these roads twice a year.

29 There are currently nine houses east of Logan Drive. Potentially building another nine houses will double the vehicle traffic down these roads. These roads were not built to withstand that additional traffic from a development to the east.

There are also two uncontrolled intersections in Big Creek Estates. There is a four-way intersection at the corner of Logan Dr and Clay Dr. There is a three-way intersection at South View Dr and Logan Dr. The request to the county for traffic-controlled measures has met resistance. Adding additional housing to the east resulting in additional vehicles on the road is going to increase the potential for a catastrophic accident at either one of these intersections.

In closing, he stated that he was in favor of growth in the City of Hays, Kansas. He believes the City needs additional housing. He believes there is plenty of opportunity within the City to find lots where the infrastructure is already in place and it will not impact the residents around it.

He thanked the Commission for their time.

Lorraine Howerton, owner of Buffalo Hills Mobile Home Park, adjoining to the north of the subject property, came before the Commission. Lorraine felt important to state that she agreed with the gentleman about the subject property being in the floodplain. This is not an area where building should be taking place. The way it is set up, the water drains from behind Home Depot all the way down to this property.

The Farm Service Agency will not even entertain allowing them to build to the east on their property because it would carry too much water. There is nothing that could be built to cross from one side of the property to the other. If they would build something to the east, it may back it up and put them in the floodplain.

She emphasized that she agreed with the gentleman that this proposed development will cause flood problems. She stated that it may not occur tomorrow or next year; it only takes one like in 1993. She reiterated about the road being closed after some rains. She stated that this is not an area where building should take place.

Paul Phillips asked for further comments. There were no more. He closed the public hearing for the commission to discuss the case.

Matthew Wheeler asked about the process for the roads for the potential development if this is rezoned. Would they be private roads or handed over to the county to meet county specifications? Curtis stated that Adam Pray is in discussion with the County now on how they move forward with that as part of the design.

Matthew Wheeler asked if the roads in the Big Creek Estates Addition are County or private roads. Curtis Deines answered that they are County roads as part of the development of Big Creek Estates Addition.

Jesse Rohr added that the decision on the public or private roads would be determined if the plat comes forward to the Planning Commission. He explained that if the plat comes forward, there is a decision at that time. The City will not bring it forward until the County gives their consideration if they will accept any more roads.

Matthew Wheeler asked if the Big Creek Sewer District would be capable of handling the potential development. Curtis Deines answered that it was explained that it would be sufficient. They will get confirmation from the Big Creek Sewer District that it would be capable to handle the development.

Matthew Wheeler asked if there was rural water in this area. He realized the Big Creek Estates Addition had private water wells. Curtis Deines answered that the southern part of Hays is the only area that does not have rural water that close to it. He will get that information of how close the rural water district is to this property.

Matthew Wheeler noted that the City is working with representatives of FEMA in revising the flood plain. He asked if this falls within the revised floodplain. Curtis Deines answered that the surveyor for the plat has incorporated that into the drawings of the plat.

Matthew Wheeler asked if there is an issue with the floodplain that they would address it at the time of the platting. Curtis Deines answered that many of the lots would not be in the floodplain. Those that may be close to the floodplain may be subject to limitations like not being able to have basements, or the home may need to be elevated.

Bernie Gribben asked if there has been any comment from the County. Curtis Deines answered that this topic was on the County Commission agenda this evening.

Jesse Rohr answered that will be part of the plat discussion. He explained that the City has the ultimate authority over the exterritorial jurisdiction of this area; however, the City did reach out to the county and asked for their official position on county services such as road maintenance, fire, police and emergency services. This is being discussed at the County Commission meeting this evening. Currently, they will not come forward with the plat, depending how the rezoning goes and until they have a decision from the county of their position of the county services. This is more of a plat issue than a rezoning issue.

31 Paul Phillips asked if they had a map for the floodplain relative to this property and asked to point out Reservation Road. Curtis Deines showed the floodplain image over the property and pointed out Reservation Road.

Paul Phillips noted that the gentleman pointed out that Reservation Road is an access road and that water flows to the east based on what he has seen after a big rain. He asked if it ever backs up onto this subject property. A lady from the audience answered that it backs up at Reservation Road and Big Creek where you go out and around on the single road to get through. A gentleman from the audience added that it limits their access to one way when they cannot access Reservation Road. Paul Phillips stated that means that they cannot go east. Paul Phillips asked the audience if what they are saying is with the potential development, that it will potentially flood more. They answered “Yes”.

Paul Phillips asked Curtis Deines for his perception of this tract of land having an impact on flooding. He is asking if building homes on that property would create a greater potential for that area to flood and create access issues for the residents already there.

Curtis Deines answered that it would depend how the water is diverted to the east. It would be a different water run off then from the grassy area that is there now. He noted water coming off the roofs and improvements may discharge the water at a different rate than the grass.

A gentleman from the audience asked about the water well setbacks to prevent any contamination. Curtis Deines will check with the County.

Jesse Rohr added to keep in mind that there is only a small percentage of each lot in the floodplain. Every lot has buildable area that is outside the floodplain itself. Paul Phillips answered that he was worried about drainage based on the concerns by those that addressed the Commission.

Paul Phillips explained to the audience that this is only an advisory board. The County and the City Commission will have to deal with this. He wanted their comments to come to the forefront.

Paul Phillips closed the public hearing.

He asked for any other questions. He entertained a motion for staff findings of fact.

Motion: Mathew Wheeler moved; Lou Caplan seconded the motion to approve Staff Findings of Fact.

Vote: AYES

32 Paul Phillips, Lou Caplan, Dustin Schlaefli, Matthew Wheeler

Nay: Bernie Gribben

Motion: Mathew Wheeler moved; Dustin Schlaefli seconded the motion to approve the change in zoning from “A-L” Agriculture to “R-G” Residential General District for a tract of land on the east side of Big Creek Estates and recommend approval to the Hays City Commission based on the conformity of the neighborhood that the surrounding area is housing and based on Staff Findings of Fact.

Matthew Wheeler added a comment for the audience that the City struggles every time the subject comes up how to expand and where to expand. We want controlled expansion, and this seems like a logical place to try to develop and expand based on whatever else comes up like flooding and the drainage and platting that are all important, but as far as the rezoning that is at stake here, he thinks this is a good idea.

Vote: AYES Paul Phillips, Lou Caplan, Dustin Schlaefli, Matthew Wheeler

Nay: Bernie Gribben

Paul Phillips thanked the audience for coming. He explained that if they desire to leave, this would be the appropriate time. They are welcome to stay.

Jesse Rohr explained to the audience of the development process. The rezoning recommendation will go before the City Commission. The next step would be the plat coming forward to the Planning Commission likely to be the third Monday in December meeting. Depending on the outcome of the plat; both the rezoning and plat would be scheduled to go before the City Commission the first or second work session in January. The City Commission makes the ultimate decision. He pointed out to watch for the agendas for the Planning Commission and City Commission meetings or contact him or Curtis Deines.

33 ORDINANCE NO.

AN ORDINANCE REZONING A TRACT OF LAND IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 14 SOUTH, RANGE 18 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPLE MERIDIAN, ELLIS COUNTY, KANSAS, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 10, BLOCK 3, BIG CREEK ESTATES, BEING LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 14 SOUTH, RANGE 18 WEST; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 22 SECONDS EAST, ALONG AN EXTENSION OF THE NORTH LINE OF BIG CREEK ESTATES, A DISTANCE OF 260.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 00 SECONDS WEST, PARALLEL WITH THE EAST LINE OF BIG CREEK ESTATES, A DISTANCE OF 974.56 FEET; THENCE NORTH 90 DEGREES 00 SECONDS WEST, ALONG AN EXTENSION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 3, BLOCK 7, BIG CREEK ESTATES, A DISTANCE OF 260.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 3, BLOCK 7, BIG CREEK ESTATES; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF BIG CREEK ESTATES, A DISTANCE OF 974.36 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID TRACT CONTAINS 5.816 ACRES.

BE REZONED FROM “A-L” (AGRICULTURE) TO “R-G” (RESIDENTIAL GENERAL DISTRICT);

WHEREAS, the Hays Area Planning Commission, after due and legal notice published on City of Hays website the official publication, on, October 21, 2020, and after a public hearing held in conformity with such notice on November 16, 2020, did, on the last mentioned date, recommend to the Governing Body of the City of Hays, Kansas, the re-zoning of the following described real estate:

A TRACT OF LAND IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 14 SOUTH, RANGE 18 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPLE MERIDIAN, ELLIS COUNTY, KANSAS, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

34 00 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF BIG CREEK ESTATES, A DISTANCE OF 974.36 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID TRACT CONTAINS 5.816 ACRES.

BE REZONED FROM “A-L” (AGRICULTURE) TO “R-G” (RESIDENTIAL GENERAL DISTRICT);

WHEREAS, upon due consideration, it appears that the best interests of the City of Hays, Kansas, will be sub served by the following recommendation of the Hays Area Planning Commission.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE CITY OF HAYS, KANSAS:

Section 1. That the following-described real estate, to-wit:

A TRACT OF LAND IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 14 SOUTH, RANGE 18 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPLE MERIDIAN, ELLIS COUNTY, KANSAS, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

BE REZONED FROM “A-L” (AGRICULTURE) TO “R-G” (RESIDENTIAL GENERAL DISTRICT);

Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect upon its publication on the City of Website, the official city news outlet publication for the City of Hays.

PASSED by the Governing Body on the 11th day of March 2021.

35 ______SANDY JACOBS Mayor

ATTEST:

______BRENDA KITCHEN City Clerk

(SEAL)

36 Commission Work Session Agenda Memo

From: Curtis W. Deines, PIE Superintendent

Work Session: March 4, 2021

Subject: Big Creek Estates Second Addition Final Plat Approval

Person(s) Responsible: Jesse Rohr, Director of Public Works

Summary The property known as the proposed Big Creek Estates Second Addition is under consideration for final plat approval. The plat consists of 14 lots. The Hays Area Planning Commission and the Ellis County Commission has given a favorable recommendation for development with conditions the developer has agreed to. The final plat meets the requirements of the current subdivision regulations in regard to lot size, setbacks, and specific utility requirements. Staff and the Hays Area Planning Commission both recommend approving the final plat as submitted.

Background This is a proposal expanding Big Creek Estates Addition located southeast of Hays. The original Big Creek Estates Addition was platted in 2004 and is nearly built out. This property currently is being used for the production of agriculture. The Comprehensive Plan identifies this area for Agriculture Production, but it is logical for the property to be developed as requested. Discussion Developer Adam Pray has submitted an application for a final plat approval for property within the proposed Big Creek Second Addition. The development, which consists of 14 lots, is located within the Big Creek Sewer District, and sewer lines will be extended to accommodate the proposed lots. Big Creek Sewer District has acknowledged their system is sized appropriately for the increased usage. Water will be provided on each lot by private well. The closest rural water district is over a mile away, east of the airport, and extension is not feasible.

There is an oil well located near this proposed development. The well has been there since 1981 and has pumped an average of 226 barrels a year for the past 10 years. There are no known issues or past history of contamination.

The proposed lots are 200 ft. deep from the west to east. The 100-year floodplain is located on the eastern side of the development approximately 75 ft. into the proposed lots. This leaves approximately 100 ft. or more of buildable depth before a structure would be in the floodplain. The developer has incorporated a drainage easement to allow flow back to the east toward the floodplain.

37 The development area is identified as (AP) Ag Production and adjacent to (LDR) Light Density Residential on the Comprehensive Plan and is compatible with the existing area.

The Utility Advisory Committee met on November 3, 2020 and supports the design of the plat. The plat meets the requirements of the current subdivision regulations in regard to lot size, setbacks, and specific utility requirements.

Upon initial review, the Ellis County Commission at their December 7, 2020 meeting, voted in favor of the development with the following conditions: The roads are to be built to County specifications, drainage must be incorporated into the design, and an agreement with adjacent property owners is needed for any necessary road right of way. Ellis County will address any traffic signage for the development. The developer has agreed to these conditions.

At their February 8, 2021 meeting, the Ellis County Commission discussed the plat for final approval and voted 3-0 to approve the plat as submitted. Developer Adam Pray has addressed any concerns how the plat will be built and maintained.

Legal Consideration There are no known legal obstacles to proceeding as recommended by City Staff.

Financial Consideration This proposed development has no known financial impact on the City of Hays.

Options The City Commission has the following options:

• Approve final plat as submitted • Request further changes or considerations to the plat • Do not approve the plat

Recommendation The final plat meets the requirements of the current subdivision regulations in regard to lot size, setbacks, and specific utility requirements. Staff, as well as the Hays Area Planning Commission, recommends approving the final plat as submitted.

Action Requested Approve a Resolution accepting the final plat of Big Creek Estates Second Addition.

Supporting Documentation Visuals/Maps Final Plat Planning Commission Minutes Ellis County Commission Minutes Plat and Dedication Resolution

38 39 40

DRAFT (EXCERPT) HAYS AREA PLANNING COMMISSION CITY HALL COMMISSION CHAMBERS DECEMBER 21, 2020 6:30 P.M.

Preliminary Plat and Final Plat of the proposed Big Creek Estates Second Addition

Curtis Deines provided a PowerPoint presentation for a request by the owner of the proposed Big Creek Estates Second Addition for preliminary and final plat consideration for approval. This plat consists of 14 lots.

Ellis County has given a favorable recommendation for development with conditions the developer has agreed to.

He showed the preliminary plat. He pointed out the short cul-de-sac at the southern end that will be a private road and privately maintained.

The development is located within the Big Creek Sewer District and will extend sewer lines to accommodate the lots. The district acknowledged that their system is sized appropriately for the increased usage. There is a sewer manhole at the north end. The new sewer will be extended south and then west to accommodate the lots.

He pointed to the oil well that is located east of the proposed development to show the distance to the plat. The well has been there since 1981 and pumped about 226 barrels a year for the past 10 years. There are no known issues or past history of contamination.

He showed the line on the map that indicates the preliminary floodplain mapping. A majority of the lots are out of the floodplain. When the structures are built, there should be no issue with being above the base flood elevations.

Water will be provided on each lot by private well. The closest rural water district is over a mile away east of the airport. It is not feasible to be extended.

41 A question came up about water wells and their proximity to the floodplain. A water well can be in the floodplain as long as it is built to be protected from floodwaters.

The proposed lots are 200 feet deep from west to east. The floodplain is located on the eastern side of the proposed lots with no more than approximately 75 feet of the lots being in the floodplain, leaving approximately 100 feet or more of buildable depth for each structure. The developer has incorporated a drainage easement back to the east toward the floodplain.

He showed a picture to show where the water would cross Reservation Road.

He presented the final plat for review.

He stated that staff recommends approving the preliminary and final plat.

He provided the actions requested. The first motion would be to approve the preliminary plat and the second motion would be to approve the final plat.

Curtis Deines and Paul Phillips asked for questions.

Paul Phillips entertained a motion.

Preliminary Plat Dustin Schlaefli moved; Jim Scheibler seconded the motion to approve the Big Creek Estates Second Addition Preliminary Plat as submitted.

Vote: AYES Paul Phillips, Lou Caplan, Dustin Schlaefli, Jim Scheibler and Matthew Wheeler

Final Plat Jim Scheibler moved; Dustin Schlaefli seconded the motion to approve Big Creek Estates Second Addition Final Plat as submitted and recommend approval to the Hays City Commission.

Vote: AYES Paul Phillips, Lou Caplan, Dustin Schlaefli, Jim Scheibler and Matthew Wheeler

42 Minutes of the December 7, 2020 Ellis County Commission Meeting (Minutes of the February 8 meeting not yet available)

43 PLAT AND DEDICATION BIG CREEK ESTATES SECOND ADDITION TO ELLIS COUNTY, KANSAS ALSO BEING A REPLAT OF LOT 10, BLOCK 3, BIG CREEK ESTATES AND LOT 3, BLOCK 7, BIG CREEK ESTATES

Adam Pray and Megan Pray, husband and wife, and Kerry M. Tiernan and April C. Tiernan, husband and wife, to the Public:

A. DEDICATION

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:

That the undersigned, Adam Pray and Megan Pray, husband and wife, and Kerry M. Tiernan and April C. Tiernan, husband and wife, the owners of the following real estate situated in Ellis County, Kansas, to-wit:

A tract of land in the Northwest Quarter of Section 11, Township 14 South, Range 18 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian, Ellis County, Kansas, described as follows by James Meis, PS 1533: Beginning at the Northwest corner of Lot 10, Block 3, Big Creek Estates, being located in the Northwest Quarter of Section 11, Township 14 South, Range 18 West; Thence North 89 degrees 57 minutes 22 seconds East, along an extension of the North line of Big Creek Estates, a distance of 380.65 feet; Thence South 00 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds West, parallel with the East line of Big Creek Estates, a distance of 974.56 feet; Thence North 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds West, along an extension of the South line of Lot 3, Block 7, Big Creek Estates, a distance of 619.99 feet to the Southwest corner of Lot 3, Block 7, Big Creek Estates; Thence North 00 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds West, along the West line of Lot 3, Block 7, Big Creek Estates a distance of 278.42 feet to the Northwest corner of Lot 3, Block 7, Big Creek Estates; Thence North 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East, along the North line of Lot 3, Block 7, Big Creek Estates, a distance of 359.99 feet to the Northeast corner of Lot 3, Block 7, Big Creek Estates; Thence North 00 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds West, along the East line of Block 6, Big Creek Estates, a distance of 503.17 feet, to the Southeast Corner of Lot 10, Block 3, Big Creek Estates; Thence North 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds West, along the South line of Lot 10, Block 3, Big Creek Estates, a distance of 120.65 feet to the Southwest corner of Lot 10, Block 3, Big Creek Estates; Thence North 00 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds West, along the West line of Lot 10, Block 3, Big Creek Estates, a distance of 192.68 feet to the Point of Beginning.

44 have caused the same to be surveyed and platted in accordance with the laws of the State of Kansas, as an addition to Ellis County, Kansas, and a plat thereof is attached hereto, made a part hereof and is a true and correct plat of BIG CREEK ESTATES SECOND ADDITION TO ELLIS COUNTY, KANSAS, ALSO BEING A REPLAT OF LOT 10, BLOCK 3, BIG CREEK ESTATES AND LOT 3, BLOCK 7, BIG CREEK ESTATES. All easements included in this addition are fully set forth and defined on the plat and are intended to be and are forever dedicated to and for the public use and purposes designated forever.

The several acres of the platted real estate are divided into lots, each of which are numbered, and the precise length and width is indicated by figures on their respective boundary lines, expressing their dimensions in feet and decimals of a foot. All of said lots are intended for sale.

B. RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS AND COVENANTS

The owner declares that the aforesaid land, shown on the plat above referred to, is held and shall be conveyed subject to the reservations, restrictions and covenants herein set forth, and also any reservations, restrictions and covenants now of record.

C. AREA OF APPLICATION

FULLY PROTECTED RESIDENTIAL AREA. The residential area covenants in Part D and E shall apply in their entirety to all lots herein.

D. RESIDENTIAL AND RECREATIONAL AREA COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS

D-1. LAND USE AND BUILDING TYPE. No lot shall be used except for residential or recreational purposes. No building shall be erected, altered, placed, or permitted to remain on any lot other than one single-family dwelling, not to exceed two stories in height and an attached and/or detached private garage. No building, basement or rooms may be rented or occupancy of said premises permitted except by a single family unit without the prior written approval of the Architectural Control Committee; provided, however, this shall not be construed to prohibit the occupancy of buildings or rooms by relatives, in-laws, or domestic servants.

D-2. DWELLING SIZE. The ground floor area of the main structure, exclusive of one-story open porches, garages, and out buildings, shall not be less than 1,200 square feet for a one-story dwelling, nor less than 1,800 square feet for a split level or 2,400 for a two-story dwelling. No attached garage to any structure shall be less than a double car garage unless waived by the Architectural Control Committee.

D-3. OUTBUILDINGS. Only two outbuilding are allowed on each lot. One outbuilding can be no larger than 200 square feet. All outbuildings shall be in conformity in style and setting to the main family dwelling and shall be subject to the approval of the Architectural Control Committee.

45 D-4. ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL. No building shall be erected, placed or altered on any lot until the construction plans and specifications and a plan showing the location of the structure have been approved by the Architectural Control Committee as to quality of workmanship and materials, harmony of external design with existing structures, and as to the location with respect to topography and finish grade elevation.

D-5. FENCES AND WALLS. No chain-link, chicken wire, barbed wire or similar type fence shall be permitted. No fence or wall shall be constructed on any lot unless and until approved by the Architectural Control Committee.

D-6. TEMPORARY STRUCTURES. No structure of a temporary character, trailer, basement, tent, shack, garage, barn or other outbuilding shall be used on any lot at any time as a residence either temporarily or permanently, provided however, that construction shacks or similar structures used temporarily by contractors for building purposes shall be permitted only during the period of construction.

D-7. BUILDING MATERIALS. No structure or building shall be moved onto any lot at any time and all structures which are permitted to be built shall be of new construction and new material, except for exterior or interior finish materials used for decorative purposes. The requirements herein may be waived by the Architectural Control Committee upon written request. Material bindings, wrappers, packages, boxes, and material scraps must be removed from Big Creek Estates Second Addition to Ellis County Also being a Replat of Lot 10, Block 3 Big Creek Estates and Lot 3, Block 7 Big Creek Estates by the contractor. If the contractor allows said materials to blow onto other homeowners' property or if the contractor dumps construction materials into the Big Creek Estates Second Addition to Ellis County, Kansas, Also being a Replat of Lot 10, Block 3, Big Creek Estates and Lot 3, Block 7, Big Creek Estates dumpsters, the Architectural Control Committee may assess the homeowner a $50.00 fine per occurrence or per dump. The homeowner shall be responsible for advising the contractor of this provision or including a clean-up provision in the construction contract.

D-8. VEHICLE PARKING. No boats, trailers, campers, motorhomes, trucks snowmobiles, all terrain vehicles or other similar vehicles nor any large commercial vehicles or agricultural trucks nor any vehicle in the process of being repaired or otherwise inoperable, shall be stored or parked on streets or driveways or in a position so as to be visible from the street unless the same are appropriately screened from view from any street or lot situated in Big Creek Estates Second Addition to Ellis County, Kansas, Also being a Replat of Lot 10, Block 3, Big Creek Estates and Lot 3, Block 7, Big Creek Estates. The Architectural Control Committee shall approve all plans to screen such vehicles from view.

D-9. SIGNS. No sign of any kind shall be displayed to the public view on any lots except one sign of not more than five square feet advertising the property for sale, or signs used by a builder to advertise the property during the construction and sales period, unless otherwise approved by the Architectural Control Committee.

46 D-10. VIEW FROM STREET OR LOT. All clotheslines, garbage cans, equipment, coolers, compost piles or storage piles shall be located as not to be visible from any lot within Big Creek Estates Second Addition to Ellis County, Kansas, Also being a Replat of Lot 10, Block 3, Big Creek Estates and Lot 3, Block 7, Big Creek Estates, unless a written exception is granted by the Architectural Control Committee.

D-11. LIVESTOCK AND POULTRY. No animals, livestock, pigeons, fowls or poultry of any kind shall be raised, bred, or kept on any lot, except that dogs (except Rotweilers, Pit bulls, Doberman Pinchers, or any declared vicious dogs), cats or other household pets may be kept, provided that they are not kept, bred or maintained for any commercial purposes. No pets may be permitted to run loose within the Addition. Households are limited to two (2) domestic animals.

D-12. TELEVISION OR SATELLITES DEVICES. The placement of all television, or satellite devices must be approved in writing by the Architectural Control Committee.

D-13. WIND POWERED GENERATORS AND RADIO TOWERS. No wind powered generators or radio towers shall be allowed within Big Creek Estates Second Addition to Ellis County, Kansas, Also being a Replat of Lot 10, Block 3, Big Creek Estates and Lot 3, Block 7, Big Creek Estates.

D-14. TANKS. No elevated tanks of any kind shall be erected, placed or permitted on any lot.

D-15. OIL AND MINING OPERATIONS. No oil drilling, oil development operations, oil refining, quarrying or mining operations of any kind shall be permitted upon or in any lot, nor shall oil of any kind be permitted upon or in any lot, nor shall oil wells, tanks, tunnels, mineral excavations or shafts be permitted upon or in any lot. No derrick or other structure designed for use in boring oil or natural gas shall be erected, maintained or permitted upon any lot.

D-16. FIREARMS. There will be no discharging of firearms for any reason, i.e., hunting, etc. on any lots herein.

E. ADDITIONAL RESIDENTIAL COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR LOTS

E-1. NUISANCES. No noxious or offensive activity shall be carried on upon any lot, nor shall anything be done thereon which may be or may become an annoyance or nuisance to the neighborhood. Noxious or offensive activity includes, but is not limited to, any activity which will create or emit any objectionable, offensive or noxious odors, dust, gases, fumes or other such material or which will in any manner violate any applicable zoning ordinance or other regulations enacted by any duly constituted governmental authority.

47 E-2. MAINTENANCE OF PROPERTY. No lot shall be used or maintained as a dumping ground for rubbish, trash, garbage or other waste shall not be kept except in sanitary containers. All other equipment for the storage or disposal of such material shall be kept in a clean and sanitary condition. All grasses, weeds and brush shall be maintained to present a pleasant and orderly visual appearance to Big Creek Estates Second Addition to Ellis County, Kansas, Also being a Replat of Lot 10, Block 3, Big Creek Estates and Lot 3, Block 7, Big Creek Estates.

E-3. SETBACK LIMITATIONS. No building or structure shall be located on lots nearer than 25 feet to any side or back lot line.

E-4. RESTRICTIONS ON SUBDIVISION. No dwelling shall be erected or placed on any lot less than the size of the lots as platted herein and there shall be no subdivision of any lots.

E-5. WATER AND SEWAGE. All lots shall be supplied by private water well and sewage disposal by Big Creek Sewer District. All water wells shall be in compliance with and approved by all state and county health agencies and shall not be placed so as to interfere with the usage of like structures on adjoining premises. Each lot owner is responsible for the cost to connect to the Big Creek sewer system and to install a water system.

E-6. STREETS AND EASEMENTS. Streets as shown, and being labeled as Pray Drive – Public Street, on the plat and not heretofore dedicated to and for public use are hereby dedicated. The access easements, as reflected upon the subdivision plat, and being labeled as Pray Drive - Private Street, have not been dedicated to the public for public access nor have they been accepted by Ellis County or the City of Hays, Kansas as public improvements. The streets, streetlights, traffic control devices, sidewalks and other improvements that are within the access easements shall be maintained by the owners of Lots 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12 within the subdivision. The access easements shall always be open to emergency vehicles, public and private utility service personnel, the United States Postal Service, and governmental employees in pursuit of their official duties. Easements are hereby dedicated for public use, as utility and drainage easement right-of- way, which are shown as lying between the dashed lines in widths indicated and as set forth on this plat, and said easements may be employed for the purpose of installing, repairing and maintaining gas lines, electric lines, telephone lines, and all other forms and types of public utilities, now or hereafter used, by the public over, under and along the strips marked "Utility Easement", and for moving or detaining storm water run-off over, under and along the strips marked "Drainage Easement".

F. ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL COMMITTEE

F-1. MEMBERSHIP. The Architectural Control Committee is composed of the Board of Directors of Big Creek Homeowner's Association. Neither the members of the committee nor its designated representative shall be entitled to any compensation for services performed pursuant to this covenant.

48 F-2. PROCEDURE. The Architectural Control Committee's approval or disapproval as required in these covenants shall be in writing. In the event the Committee, or its designated representative, fails to approve or disapprove within thirty (30) days after plans and specifications have been submitted to it, or in any event, if no suit to enjoin the construction has been commenced prior to completion thereof, approval will not be required and the record covenants shall be deemed to have been fully complied with.

G. HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION

G-1. SHAREHOLDER. An owner of Lots 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12, upon becoming the record owner of title to said lot, shall automatically be a shareholder of an Association which shall be established and known as the Big Creek Homeowner's Association and shall remain a shareholder for the period of said ownership. The Association has been heretofore or will be incorporated under the laws of the State of Kansas as a corporation not for profit. The Association shall be governed by a Board of Directors as is provided in the Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws of the Association.

G-2. BENEFITS. No lot owner identified in G-1 shall be entitled to any of the benefits, improvements or services provided by the Association unless the owner thereof shall have subjected his, her or its lot to the terms of the restrictions and covenants contained herein. For purposes hereof, accepting title to a lot within Big Creek Estates Second Addition to Ellis County, Kansas, Also being a Replat of Lot 10, Block 3, Big Creek Estates and Lot 3, Block 7, Big Creek Estates after the recording of this Plat and Dedication shall satisfy the foregoing requirements.

G-3. VOTING RIGHTS. The Big Creek Homeowner's Association shall have two (2) classes of voting stock, all as more fully set forth in the Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws of the Association.

H. GENERAL PROVISIONS

H-1. ZONING AND PLANNING. The aforesaid real estate shall further be subject to the zoning and planning ordinances of the City of Hays, Kansas and Ellis County, Kansas as is appropriate under the circumstances.

H-2. TERM. These covenants are to run with the land and shall be binding on all parties and all persons claiming under them for a period of twenty-five (25) years from the time these covenants are recorded, after which time said covenants shall be automatically extended for successive periods of ten (10) years, unless an instrument signed by a majority of the then lot owners has been recorded, agreeing to change said covenants in whole or in part.

H-3. ENFORCEMENT. Enforcement shall be by proceedings at law or in equity against any person or persons violating, or attempting to violate, any covenant or restriction contained herein either to restrain violation or to recover damages.

49 H-4. SEVERABILITY. Invalidation of any of these covenants by judgment or court order shall in no wise affect the other provisions which shall remain in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this ______day of ______, 2021.

Adam Pray Megan Pray

STATE OF KANSAS, COUNTY OF ELLIS, ss:

BE IT REMEMBERED, that on this _____day of ______, 2021 before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public, duly commissioned, in and for the county and state aforesaid, came Adam Pray and Megan Pray, husband and wife, known to me to be the same person who executed the foregoing instrument of writing in behalf of herself and duly acknowledged the execution of the same for herself for the uses and purposed therein set forth.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and official seal on the day and year last above written.

My Commission Expires: Notary Public

Kerry M. Tiernan April C. Tiernan

STATE OF KANSAS, COUNTY OF ELLIS, ss:

BE IT REMEMBERED, that on this _____day of ______, 2021 before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public, duly commissioned, in and for the county and state aforesaid, came Kerry M. Tiernan and April C. Tiernan, husband and wife, known to me to be the same person who executed the foregoing instrument of writing in behalf of herself and duly acknowledged the execution of the same for herself for the uses and purposed therein set forth.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and official seal on the day and year last above written.

My Commission Expires: Notary Public

50 CONSENT TO REPLAT AND DEDICATION

I, Ruth A. Ruder, Vice President of Golden Plains Credit Union, hereby declare that the real estate described as follows: Big Creek Estates Second Addition to Ellis County, Also being a Replat of Lot 10, Block 3, Big Creek Estates and Lot 3, Block 7, Big Creek Estates is subject to mortgages by Kerry M. Tiernan and April C. Tiernan, husband and wife, to Golden Plains Credit Union, and notwithstanding said liens, Golden Plains Credit Union, hereby consents to this Plat and Dedication.

______Ruth A. Ruder, Vice President

STATE OF KANSAS, COUNTY OF ELLIS, ss:

BE IT REMEMBERED, that on this _____ day of ______, 2021 before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public, in and for said County and State, came Ruth A. Ruder, Vice President of Golden Plains Credit Union, who is personally known to me to be the same person who executed the within instrument of writing and duly acknowledged the execution of same.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my seal the day and year last above written.

Comm. expires: ______Notary Public

STATE OF KANSAS, ELLIS COUNTY, ss:

James Meis, Driggs Design Group, PA, certifies that the attached plat is a true and correct plat of Big Creek Estates Second Addition to Ellis County, Kansas, Also being a Replat of Lot 10, Block 3, Big Creek Estates and Lot 3, Block 7, Big Creek Estates, the same being surveyed and platted by me, the undersigned, a qualified and licensed land surveyor.

James Meis, PS 1533

Dated at ______, Kansas, this ______day of ______, 2021.

51 STATE OF KANSAS, ELLIS COUNTY, ss:

Be it known that the attached plat has been submitted to me and that the same is hereby approved this ______day of ______, 2021.

John T. Bird City Attorney, Hays, Kansas

STATE OF KANSAS, ELLIS COUNTY, ss:

I, Sandy Jacobs, Mayor of the City of Hays, Kansas, hereby certify that the attached plat was approved by the Governing Body of the City of Hays, Kansas on this _____ day of ______, 2021.

______Sandy Jacobs Mayor, City of Hays, Kansas

ATTEST:

Brenda Kitchen, City Clerk

(SEAL)

STATE OF KANSAS, ELLIS COUNTY, ss:

Be it known that the attached plat has been submitted to me and that the same is hereby approved this ______day of ______, 2021.

Bill Jeter Attorney for Ellis County

52 STATE OF KANSAS, ELLIS COUNTY, ss:

I, Robert (Butch) Schlyer, Chairman of the Board of the Ellis County Commissioners hereby certify that the attached plat of Big Creek Estates Second Addition to Ellis County, Kansas, Also being a Replat of Lot 10, Block 3, Big Creek Estates and Lot 3, Block 7, Big Creek Estates to Ellis County, Kansas was approved by the Board of County Commissioners of Ellis County, Kansas on the ______day of ______, 2021.

Robert (Butch) Schlyer, Chairman ATTEST:

Bobbi Dreiling, County Clerk (SEAL)

53 RESOLUTION NO. 2021-

GOVERNING BODY OF THE CITY OF HAYS, KANSAS, TO THE PUBLIC:

WHEREAS, Adam Pray has presented to the Governing Body of the City of Hays, Kansas, a certain Plat of BIG CREEK ESTATES SECOND ADDITION, situated within the corporate limits of the City of Hays, Kansas, said plat covering the following described real estate, to-wit:

A TRACT OF LAND IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 15 SOUTH, RANGE 18 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPLE MERIDIAN, ELLIS COUNTY, KANSAS, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 10, BLOCK 3, BIG CREEK ESTATES, BEING LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 14 SOUTH, RANGE 18 WEST; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 22 SECONDS EAST, ALONG AN EXTENSION OF THE NORTH LINE OF BIG CREEK ESTATES, A DISTANCE OF 380.64 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 000 SECONDS WEST, PARALLEL WITH THE EAST LINE OF BIG CREEK ESTATES, A DISCANCE OF 974.56 FEET; THENCE NORTH 90 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 00 SECONDS WEST, ALONG AN EXTENSION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 3, BLOCK 7, BIG CREEK ESTATES, A DISTANCE OF 619.99 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 3, BLOCK 7, BIG CREEK ESTATES; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 00 SECONDS WEST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF LOT 3, BLOCK 7, BIG CREEK ESTATES A DISANCE OF 278.42 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 3, BLOCK 7, BIG CREEK ESTATES; THENCE NORTH 90 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 3, BLOCK 7, BIG CREEK ESTATES, A DISTANCE OF 359.99 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 3, BLOCK 7, BIG CREEK ESTATES; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 00 SECONDS WEST, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF BLOCK 6, BIG CREEK ESTATES, A DISTANCE OF 503.17 FEET, TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 10, BLOCK 3 BIG CREEK ESTATES; THENCE NORTH 90 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 00 SECNDS WEST, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 10, BLOCK 3 BIG CREEK ESTATES, A DISTANCE OF 120.65 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 10, BLOCK 3, BIG CREEK ESTATES; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 00 SECONTS WEST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF LOT 10, BLOCK 3, BIG CREEK ESTATES, A DISTANCE OF 192.68 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, SAID TRACT CONTAINS 8.651 ACRES MORE OR LESS. to be known as BIG CREEK ESTATES SECOND ADDITION to the City of Hays, Kansas; and,

WHEREAS, the said plat has been examined and considered by the Hays Area Planning Commission of the City of Hays, Kansas; and,

WHEREAS, the City Attorney of the City of Hays, Kansas, has found that the proposed plat conforms to the requirements of the statutes in such matters made and provided.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE CITY OF HAYS, KANSAS, that the City of Hays, Kansas, hereby approves the plat of BIG CREEK ESTATES SECOND ADDITION to the City of Hays, Kansas, and the City Clerk is instructed to endorse such approval on said plat.

54 Passed and adopted by the Governing Body of the City of Hays, Kansas, this 11th day of March, 2021.

______Sandy Jacobs - Mayor

ATTEST:

BY______Brenda Kitchen - City Clerk

(SEAL)

55 56 Commission Work Session Agenda Memo

From: Jesse Rohr, Director of Public Works

Work Session: March 4, 2021

Subject: 2021 Street Maintenance Program – Award of Bid

Person(s) Responsible: Jesse Rohr, Director of Public Works

Summary Bids for the 2021 Street Maintenance Projects were opened on February 9, 2021. The projects bid with this year’s program include seal coat, polypatch, curb & brick repair, concrete patching, mill and overlay, pavement markings and sidewalk construction. This memo discusses the bids received from nine different contractors and recommends entering contracts with the low bidders for all projects. The projects awarded would be accomplished at various locations at various times throughout this year. The total of the low bid contracts being recommended would be $959,202.45 to be funded out of Special Highway.

Background At the November 19, 2020 City Commission Work Session, staff presented a proposed Street Maintenance Program for 2021. The plan presented to the City Commission at that time called for $950,650 of contracted work to include seal coat, polypatch, curb & brick repair, concrete patching, mill and overlay, pavement markings and sidewalk construction; along with $40,000 of in-house work and $5,000 for a sidewalk program. The total program cost was estimated to be $995,650, which is the amount of funding included in the 2021 Budget for these projects. The sources of funding for this year’s Street Maintenance Program are:

Available Funds in 2021 Special Highway - State Gas Tax Refund (KDOT) $ 471,150 - Connecting Link Maintenance (KDOT) $ 74,500 - Transfer from General Fund $ 500,000 - Contingency (keep for unforeseen expenses) $ -(50,000) Total Available $ 995,650

Discussion Bids from nine different contractors were received on February 9, 2021. The tabulation of bids is attached. The bid documents were structured so that contractors could bid on one or more of the 16 various projects, and separate contracts could be awarded for each type of work. The projects are detailed below, and a map showing the location of all projects is attached.

1. Seal Coat Seal Coat is a bituminous liquid mixture that is applied to asphalt pavement. Seal Coat has a smooth black finish and does not have a rock surface like Chip Seal. The seal coat will fill the fine cracks developing in the asphalt and preserve the life of the street. Most of the streets identified for seal coat last received a chip seal 5 or 6 years ago.

The low bid for seal coat is from Circle C Paving of Goddard, KS at the unit bid price of $1.39 per SY for 136,130 SY resulting in a total cost of $189,220.70

2. Polypatch This project called for 2,000 gallons of polypatch to be used on various streets throughout the City to fill large cracks and depressions. Some of the quantity will be used to prepare the streets scheduled for surface seals, and the remainder of the quantity will be used as needed to make repairs to streets that may fail in spots due to winter weather.

The low bid for polypatch is from Stripe & Seal of Hays at the unit bid price of $10.99 per gallon for 2000 gallons resulting in a total cost of $21,980.

3. Curb and Brick Repair Curb and Brick Repair typically is performed in the old brick street areas of town. This year’s project is concentrated in two areas: the 200 Blk of E 16th (Oak to Pine) and the 200 Blk of W 16th (Ash to Fort – North half of street only).

The low bid for the two curb and brick projects came from J Corp of Hays. The cost of the 200 Blk of East 16th project amounted to $228,415. The cost of the 200 Blk of West 16th project amounted to $70,138. The total for both projects is $298,553.

4. Concrete Patching Concrete Patch work will be performed in various areas where a large concrete panel or several panels have deteriorated to the point of needing total replacement. It has been several years since a concrete patching project was completed within the annual street maintenance program.

Seven various project locations were bid (see attached map) but only six are being recommended in order to bring the total 2021 street maintenance project costs under budget. The single project not being recommended (12th St. just West of Vine) will likely be done in-house at a later date.

The six concrete patching projects being recommended had a low bid of $177,706 submitted by Morgan Brothers of La Crosse.

5. Profile Mill and Overlay Asphalt Mill and Overlay involves profile milling the surface from 2” depth at the curb line to 0” at the centerline then overlaying with 2” of new asphalt pavement.

58 The low bid for the mill and overlay on Fort St. from 33rd to 38th St. is from APAC of Hays at a total cost of $109,826.

6. Pavement Markings Pavement Markings on Vine St. from 13th to 29th St. are in need of replacement. These high-traffic areas require a paint product conducive to large vehicle counts found on a busy roadway. Similar to 2020, staff proposes to contract out this service to a contractor that has the specialized equipment to be able to put down paint markings that will last longer than standard traffic paint applied in-house.

The low bid from Road Safe of Wichita for the pavement markings came in at $118,901.75.

7. Sidewalk For 2021, staff is proposing to once again address areas of the city where sidewalk is warranted, but does not currently exist. Three areas of sidewalk were bid including $24,835 for sidewalk along East 22nd St. (from Multi-use path connection to Wheatland Ave.), $8,726.25 for the corner of 13th and Golden Belt, and $9,453.75 for sidewalk at the corner of 13th and Agnes. J Corp of Hays was the low bidder on all three projects for a total cost of $43,015. ($12,417.50 will be reimbursed to the City for the East 22nd St. sidewalk by the Heart of America Development Corporation)

A summary of the work proposed is listed here:

Project Contractor Actual Bids Seal Coat Circle C $189,220.70 Polypatch Stripe & Seal $21,980.00 Curb and Brick Repair - West 16th St. J Corp $70,138.00 Curb and Brick Repair - East 16th St. J Corp $228,415.00 Concrete Patching - 500 Blk E 20th Morgan Brothers $66,615.00 Concrete Patching - 500 Blk E 20th Alt. Morgan Brothers $23,925.00 Concrete Patching - 500 Blk E 18th Alt. Morgan Brothers $19,475.00 Concrete Patching - NE Corner 8th and Ash Alt. Morgan Brothers $12,048.50 Concrete Patching - 600 E 11th Alt. Morgan Brothers $37,472.50 Concrete Patching - 400 E 5th Alt. Morgan Brothers $18,170.00 Mill and Overlay APAC $109,826.00 Pavement Marking Road Safe $118,901.75 Sidewalk - E 22nd St. J Corp $24,835.00 Sidewalk - 13th and Golden Belt Alt. J Corp $8,726.25 Sidewalk - 13th and Agnes Alt. J Corp $9,453.75 Total $959,202.45 Sidewalk Rebate $5,000.00 In-House $40,000.00 TOTAL $1,004,202.45 RHID Sidewalk Reimbursement $12,417.50 Total Cost of All Projects $991,784.95 SP HWY Funding Available $995,650.00 BALANCE $3,865.05

The seal coat, polypatch, mill and overlay and pavement markings would be accomplished during the summer when warm temperatures are favorable for these surface treatments. Other projects could begin sooner based on weather and other scheduling considerations. All projects are scheduled to be completed no later than the end of 2021. Contact with adjacent property owners and other stakeholders will be made well in advance of any construction activities.

Legal Consideration There are no known legal obstacles to proceeding as recommended by City Staff.

Financial Consideration As mentioned in the Background Section of this memo, $995,650 was identified in the 2021 Special Highway Budget for Street Maintenance. Subtracting $5,000 for the Sidewalk Rebate Program and $40,000 for in-house material costs for crack seal and other pavement repairs, leaves $950,650 for contracted projects. The total amount of all proposed contracts is $959,202.45, which after the Heart of America Development Corporation reimbursement of $12,417.50 for the East 22nd St. sidewalk, leaves a balance of $3,865.05. $50,000 in contingency funds remains for any unforeseen expenses.

Options The City Commission has the following options: • Award contracts as recommended by City Staff • Provide alternate direction to City Staff

Recommendation Staff recommends awarding the contracts to the low bidders as presented.

Action Requested Authorize the City Manager to enter contracts for construction as follows: • Circle C Paving and Construction, LLC in the amount of $189,220.70 for Seal Coat; • Stripe & Seal in the amount of $21,980.00 for Polypatch; • J Corp., Inc. in the amount of $341,568.00 for curb and brick repairs in the East and West 200 Blks of 16th St. and Sidewalk projects along East 22nd, 13th and Golden Belt, and 13th and Agnes; • Morgan Brothers Construction in the amount of $177,706.00 for various locations of concrete patching/panel replacement; • APAC, Inc. in the amount of $109,826.00 for profile mill and overlay of Fort St. from 33rd to 38th; • Road Safe Traffic Systems, Inc. in the amount of $118,901.75 for Pavement Markings on Vine St. from 13th to 29th St.;

All to be funded out of Special Highway – Budgeted Projects, with the exception of $12,417.50 (50% of total project) reimbursement for the East 22nd St. sidewalk from the Heart of America Development Corporation.

60 Supporting Documentation Location Maps Tabulation of Bids

61 T I E 3 4 R EEK CT C

A R

E 2 C

E 2 MA ER CUMBERLAND DR CUMBERLAND R P E OP P C

WHEATLAND AVE WHEATLAND E 20TH ST C

HARVEST RD HARVEST

NCK RD NCK E 22ND ST RD HARVEST

E 25TH ST

E 20TH ST DR JUDITH

E 19TH ST 19TH E CITY OF H DR ANTHONY

HAYS MEDICAL CENTER

AGNES DR AGNES WESTERN PLAINS DR PLAINS WESTERN

E 21ST ST

GOLDEN BELT DR BELT GOLDEN VOLGA DR VOLGA

E 17TH ST

METRO LN

E 22ND ST

METRO LN

PATIO DR CANTERBURY DR CANTERBURY

E 12TH ST CANTERBURY DR CANTERBURY

E 29TH ST JOR IE DR

DOUGLAS DR DOUGLAS MAR N IDA LN IDA HENRY DR HENRY

E 15TH ST

HANEY DR HANEY

HENRY DR HENRY STERNBERG DR STERNBERG

MARJORIE DR MARJORIE R

MARJORIE DR MARJORIE

Seal Coat DR FELTEN 2021 Street Maint DR HANEY Sidewalk Curb & Brick Repair Concrete Patch Mill & Overlay Pavement Markings

E 26TH ST

E 24TH ST

HANEY DR HANEY

DONALD DR DONALD

DR NORTH STERNBERG CT D FELTEN DR FELTEN

DOUGLAS DR DOUGLAS

FELTEN DR FELTEN DONALD DR DONALD SOUTH STERNBERG CT DR STEVEN BROOKSIDE DR

E 25TH ST

TIMBER DR TIMBER LAWRENCE DR LAWRENCE DONALD DR DONALD

ROOSEVELT AVE E 22ND ST

SUNSET TRL SUNSET BARCLAY DR DR VIRGINIA

VIRGINIA DR TRINITY DR

E 29TH ST

E 26TH ST

E 28TH ST

E 28TH ST TER TRL INDIAN INDIAN TRL INDIAN

MAC ARTHUR RD ARTHUR MAC

E 24TH ST

GRANT AVE GRANT EISENHOWER RD EISENHOWER

DRUM AVE E 20TH ST

CENTENNIAL BLVD RD MARSHALL E 27TH ST FRONTAGE RD AVE SHERMAN

E 27TH ST TER

E 32ND ST

E 31ST ST

WHITTIER RD WHITTIER

SHERMAN AVE SHERMAN SCHWALLER AVE DOWNING FARLEY AVE PL RD HOLMES

E 19TH ST

E 15TH ST

SCHWALLER AVE MOTZSCHWALLER AVE

E 17TH ST HOLMES RD HOLMES E 18TH ST

E 21ST ST

E 29TH ST

E 30TH ST RD CUSTER GENERAL

E 33RD ST

BROADWAY AVE BROADWAY

GENERAL LAWTON RD LAWTON GENERAL

LONGFELLOW RD LONGFELLOW E 8TH ST

GENERAL HANCOCK RD HANCOCK GENERAL

PLAZA AVE PLAZA DRUM AVE

E 26TH ST RD CUSTER GENERAL

E 17TH ST

CODY AVE RD DECHANT

DOWNING AVE GENERAL HAYS RD HAYS GENERAL

E 29TH ST Y

E 22ND ST

PUBLIC WORKS RD E 37TH ST RD MALL CENTENNIAL

VINE ST VINE

E 22ND ST ST CEDAR SKYLINE DR SKYLINE E 10TH ST

CEDAR ST CEDAR 62

E 28TH ST 28TH E E 6TH ST CIRCLE DR CIRCLE E 24TH ST W 33RD ST CT NORTHRIDGE

E 26TH ST E 23RD ST MILNER ST MILNER

MONTGOMERY ST MONTGOMERY

NORTHRIDGE DR DR NORTHRIDGE E 25TH ST

OAK ST OAK OAK ST E 8TH ST E 7TH ST SPRUCE ST SPRUCE

E 28TH ST

ALLEN ST ALLEN

MAPLE ST MAPLE WOODROW CT WOODROW E 5TH ST

MAIN ST TER ST MAIN

OAK ST OAK

HIGHLAND AVE TER ST OAK

FORT ST FORT MAIN ST MAIN

FORT ST FORT RILEY ST RILEY

E 21ST ST

ASH ST

HICKORY ST HICKORY PINE ST PINE

E 29TH ST

OAK ST OAK

ASH ST ASH W 26TH ST W 34TH ST DR SKYLINE

W 35TH ST

W 38TH ST

W 37TH ST

W 36TH ST W 32ND ST 32ND W

SKYLINE CT SKYLINE W 22ND ST

WILLOW ST WILLOW W 24TH ST W 21ST ST ST MILNER

W 20TH ST

W 25TH ST

W 19TH ST

COUNTRY LN COUNTRY

SUMMER LN SUMMER

W 18TH ST ST ALLEN

W 38TH ST

U W 23RD ST CO

W 17TH ST DR FE SANTA

COTTONWOOD LN COTTONWOOD

LINCOLN DR LINCOLN W 16TH ST PINE ST PINE

W 15TH ST US 183 ALT HWY

PERSHING CT

HILLCREST DR HILLCREST W 14TH ST

HILLCREST DR HILLCREST W 13TH ST OAK ST OAK

WALNUT ST WALNUT W 20TH ST W 19TH ST WALNUT ST WALNUT W 12TH ST

W 37TH ST W 11TH ST

W 29TH ST W 33RD ST ST MAIN CANAL BLVD CANAL W 10TH ST

AUTUMN LN ELM ST ELM

CANAL BLVD ST WALNUT W 9TH ST

W 8TH ST ELM ST ELM

W 7TH ST

CANAL BLVD CANAL

FORT ST FORT W 6TH ST

W 34TH ST ANAL BLVD ST ELM W 5TH ST C

MISSION MT W 4TH ST

W 31ST ST

W 32ND ST

W 30TH ST W 17TH ST ST ASH

W 35TH ST

W 29TH ST W 3RD ST W 24TH ST W 21ST ST W 16TH ST W 23RD ST

W 20TH ST

W 19TH ST

W 15TH ST DEPOT PARKING ST

HALL ST HALL W 14TH ST W 1ST ST FORT ST FORT

ELDORADO LN ELDORADO

MAIN ST MAIN

WALNUT ST WALNUT

W 37TH ST LN TURNBERRY

W 38TH ST W 36TH ST FAIRWAY DR FAIRWAY W 2ND ST ELM ST ELM

AUGUSTA LN W 3RD ST

FAIRWAY DR

W 4TH ST

W 28TH ST CHAUMONT DR CHAUMONT

TORREY PINES DR PINES TORREY

TAMARAC CIR TAMARAC

AUGUSTA LN AUGUSTA ELM ST CLUBHOUSE DR PINEHURST ST ST PARK

COUNTRY CLUB DR

OAKMONT ST

AMHURST ST OLYMPIC LN OLYMPIC

COLONIAL ST COLONIAL TAM OSHANTER DR DR ENGLEWOOD LEWIS DR

PRIVATE ST W 26TH ST

DWIGHT DR DWIGHT

TAM OSHANTER DR OSHANTER TAM CUSTER DR CUSTER

SOUTH CAMPUS DR AGNEW LN

ENGLEWOOD DR DR LYMAN

W 12TH ST DR COLLEGE

LYMAN DR LYMAN THUNDERBIRD DR THUNDERBIRD CASTILLIAN BLVD NORTH CAMPUS DR

GREENBRIER LN

POLICE DR POLICE

THUNDERBIRD CIR THUNDERBIRD THU N DWIGHT DR

W 8TH ST GUSTAD DR

W 37TH ST CHERRY HILL DR HILL CHERRY

THUNDERBIRDDR HILL DRCHERRY THUNDERBIRD CT THUNDERBIRD

OAKMONT ST

W 30TH ST

W 28TH ST

W 29TH ST GUSTAD DR GUSTAD

COLUMBINE DR COLUMBINE

OSIE WAY OSIE

J T COH Project 2020-28, 2021 Street Maintenance Staff Estimate Circle C Vance Bros. Hall Bros. Stripe & Seal Sweeney J Corp Morgan APAC Road Safe Bid Description Quantity Unit Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Item Price Price Price Price Price Price Price Price Price Price 1 Seal Coat 136,130 SY $ 1.60 $ 217,808.00 $ 1.39 $ 189,220.70 $ 1.45 $ 197,388.50 $ 1.64 $ 223,253.20 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -

2 Polypatch 2000 Gal $ 15.00 $ 30,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ 10.99 $ 21,980.00 $ 14.715 $ 29,430.00 $ - $ - $ - $ -

3 Curb and Brick Repair Quantity Unit Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total E 16th (Oak to Pine) Price Price Price Price Price Price Price Price Price Price 3a Concrete Drive Entrance 6" - Reinforced 94 SY $ 70.00 $ 6,580.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100.00 $ 9,400.00 $ 65.00 $ 6,110.00 $ - $ - 3b Curb and Gutter 677 LF $ 35.00 $ 23,695.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 40.00 $ 27,080.00 $ 25.00 $ 16,925.00 $ - $ - 3c Integral Curb 89 LF $ 30.00 $ 2,670.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 38.00 $ 3,382.00 $ 25.00 $ 2,225.00 $ - $ - 3d Sidewalk 4" 124 SF $ 6.00 $ 744.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 4.50 $ 558.00 $ 8.00 $ 992.00 $ - $ - 3e Brick Patching 1497 SY $ 135.00 $ 202,095.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 115.00 $ 172,155.00 $ 145.00 $ 217,065.00 $ - $ - 3f Salvage Brick 36,000 EA $ 0.60 $ 21,600.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 0.44 $ 15,840.00 $ 1.23 $ 44,280.00 $ - $ - Total Bid E 16th $ 257,384.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 228,415.00 $ 287,597.00 $ - $ -

Quantity Unit Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total W 16th (Ash to Fort) Price Price Price Price Price Price Price Price Price Price 3.1a Concrete Drive Entrance 6" - Reinforced 33 SY $ 70.00 $ 2,310.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100.00 $ 3,300.00 $ 65.00 $ 2,145.00 $ - $ - 3.1b Curb and Gutter 54 LF $ 35.00 $ 1,890.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 60.00 $ 3,240.00 $ 25.00 $ 1,350.00 $ - $ - 3.1c Integral Curb 18 LF $ 30.00 $ 540.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 38.00 $ 684.00 $ 25.00 $ 450.00 $ - $ - 3.1d Sidewalk 4" 232 SF $ 6.00 $ 1,392.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 4.50 $ 1,044.00 $ 8.00 $ 1,856.00 $ - $ - 3.1e Brick Patching 578 SY $ 140.00 $ 80,920.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 95.00 $ 54,910.00 $ 145.00 $ 83,810.00 $ - $ - 3.1f Salvage Brick 14,000 EA $ 0.60 $ 8,400.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 0.44 $ 6,160.00 $ 1.23 $ 17,220.00 $ - $ - 3.1g Truncated Domes Surface for ADA Ramps 16 SF $ 40.00 $ 640.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 50.00 $ 800.00 $ 50.00 $ 800.00 $ - $ - Total Bid W 16th $ 96,092.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 70,138.00 $ 107,631.00 $ - $ -

Total Bid Item #3 $ 353,476.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 298,553.00 $ 395,228.00 $ - $ -

4 Concrete Patching 4 500 Block E 20th (Base) Quantity Unit Price Total Price Total Price Total Price Total Price Total Price Total Price Total Price Total Price Total Price Total 4a Concrete Pavement 8" -NRDJ 821 SY $ 75.00 $ 61,575.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 85.00 $ 69,785.00 $ 75.00 $ 61,575.00 $ 93.40 $ 76,681.40 $ - 4b Concrete Drive Entrance 6" - Reinforced 36 SY $ 70.00 $ 2,520.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 80.00 $ 2,880.00 $ 65.00 $ 2,340.00 $ 92.00 $ 3,312.00 $ - 4c Curb and Gutter 91 LF $ 35.00 $ 3,185.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 50.00 $ 4,550.00 $ 25.00 $ 2,275.00 $ 34.35 $ 3,125.85 $ - 4d Integral Curb 17 LF $ 30.00 $ 510.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 40.00 $ 680.00 $ 25.00 $ 425.00 $ 26.00 $ 442.00 $ - Total 500 Block E 20th Base Bid $ 67,790.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 77,895.00 $ 66,615.00 $ 83,561.25 $ -

4.1 500 Block E 20 Add Alternate Quantity Unit Price Total Price Total Price Total Price Total Price Total Price Total Price Total Price Total Price Total Price Total 4.1a Concrete Pavement 8" -NRDJ 319.0 SY $ 75.00 $ 23,925.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 95.00 $ 30,305.00 $ 75.00 $ 23,925.00 $ 91.45 $ 29,172.55 $ - Total 500 Block E 20th Add Alternate $ 23,925.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 30,305.00 $ 23,925.00 $ 29,172.55 $ -

4.2 500 Block E 18th Alternate Quantity Unit Price Total Price Total Price Total Price Total Price Total Price Total Price Total Price Total Price Total Price Total 4.2a Concrete Pavement 8" -NRDJ 225.0 SY $ 90.00 $ 20,250.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 95.00 $ 21,375.00 $ 75.00 $ 16,875.00 $ 91.00 $ 20,475.00 $ - 4.2b Concrete Valley Gutter 8" - reinforced 13.0 SY $ 90.00 $ 1,170.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100.00 $ 1,300.00 $ 200.00 $ 2,600.00 $ 154.00 $ 2,002.00 $ - Total 500 Block E 18th Add Alternate $ 21,420.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 22,675.00 $ 19,475.00 $ 22,477.00 $ -

4.3 NE corner of 8th and Ash Alternate Quantity Unit Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total 4.3a Concrete Pavement 8" -NRDJ 37.5 SY $ 90.00 $ 3,375.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 150.00 $ 5,625.00 $ 95.00 $ 3,562.50 $ 96.70 $ 3,626.25 $ - 4.3b Concrete Alleys and Returns 8" - reinforced 36.5 SY $ 90.00 $ 3,285.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 140.00 $ 5,110.00 $ 95.00 $ 3,467.50 $ 105.00 $ 3,832.50 $ - 4.3c Concrete Drive Entrance 6" - Reinforced 35.6 SY $ 70.00 $ 2,492.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 85.00 $ 3,026.00 $ 85.00 $ 3,026.00 $ 92.33 $ 3,286.95 $ - 4.3d Integral Curb 41.5 LF $ 30.00 $ 1,245.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 45.00 $ 1,867.50 $ 35.00 $ 1,452.50 $ 27.50 $ 1,141.25 $ - 4.3e Sidewalk 4" 30 SF $ 7.00 $ 210.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 15.00 $ 450.00 $ 18.00 $ 540.00 $ 13.35 $ 400.50 $ - Total NE Corner of 8th & Ash Add Alternate $ 10,607.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 16,078.50 $ 12,048.50 $ 12,287.45 $ -

4.4 12th Street West of Vine Alternate Quantity Unit Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total 4.4a Concrete Pavement 8" -NRDJ 334.5 SY $ 80.00 $ 26,760.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 90.00 $ 30,105.00 $ 75.00 $ 25,087.50 $ 109.40 $ 36,594.30 $ - 4.4b Concrete Drive Entrance 6" - Reinforced 14 SY $ 70.00 $ 980.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 85.00 $ 1,190.00 $ 65.00 $ 910.00 $ 113.20 $ 1,584.80 $ - 4.4c Curb and Gutter 62 LF $ 35.00 $ 2,170.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 65.00 $ 4,030.00 $ 25.00 $ 1,550.00 $ 33.35 $ 2,067.70 $ - 4.4d Integral Curb 11 LF $ 30.00 $ 330.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 38.00 $ 418.00 $ 25.00 $ 275.00 $ 41.42 $ 455.62 $ - 4.4e Sidewalk 4" 150 SF $ 6.00 $ 900.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 12.00 $ 1,800.00 $ 8.00 $ 1,200.00 $ 14.52 $ 2,178.00 $ - Total 12th Street West of Vine Add Alternate $ 31,140.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 37,543.00 $ 29,022.50 $ 42,880.42 $ -

4.5 600 E 11th Alternate Quantity Unit Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total 4.5a Concrete Pavement 8" -NRDJ 468 SY $ 80.00 $ 37,440.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 90.00 $ 42,120.00 $ 75.00 $ 35,100.00 $ 101.60 $ 47,548.80 $ - 4.5b Concrete Drive Entrance 6" - Reinforced 13.5 SY $ 70.00 $ 945.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 85.00 $ 1,147.50 $ 65.00 $ 877.50 $ 64.60 $ 872.10 $ - 4.5c Curb and Gutter 41 LF $ 35.00 $ 1,435.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 65.00 $ 2,665.00 $ 25.00 $ 1,025.00 $ 24.48 $ 1,003.68 $ - 4.5d Integral Curb 14 LF $ 30.00 $ 420.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 45.00 $ 630.00 $ 25.00 $ 350.00 $ 32.75 $ 458.50 $ - 4.5e Sidewalk 4" 15 SF $ 7.00 $ 105.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 15.00 $ 225.00 $ 8.00 $ 120.00 $ 33.00 $ 495.00 $ - Total 600 Block E 11th Add Alternate $ 40,345.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 46,787.50 $ 37,472.50 $ 50,378.08 $ -

4.6 400 E 5th Alternate Quantity Unit Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total 4.6a Concrete Pavement 8" -NRDJ 189 SY $ 80.00 $ 15,120.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100.00 $ 18,900.00 $ 75.00 $ 14,175.00 $ 124.50 $ 23,530.50 $ - 4.6b Concrete Drive Entrance 6" - Reinforced 28.5 SY $ 70.00 $ 1,995.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 90.00 $ 2,565.00 $ 65.00 $ 1,852.50 $ 79.75 $ 2,272.88 $ - 4.6c Curb and Gutter 32.5 LF $ 35.00 $ 1,137.50 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 65.00 $ 2,112.50 $ 25.00 $ 812.50 $ 46.65 $ 1,516.13 $ - 4.6d Integral Curb 10 LF $ 30.00 $ 300.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 45.00 $ 450.00 $ 25.00 $ 250.00 $ 45.00 $ 450.00 $ - 4.6e Sidewalk 4" 135 SF $ 6.00 $ 810.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 12.00 $ 1,620.00 $ 8.00 $ 1,080.00 $ 18.75 $ 2,531.25 $ -

63 Total 400 E 5th Add Alternate $ 19,362.50 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 25,647.50 $ 18,170.00 $ 30,300.75 $ -

Total Base Bid #4 plus all Six Alternates $ 214,589.50 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 256,931.50 $ 206,728.50 $ 271,057.50 $ -

5 Profile Mill and Overlay Quantity Unit Price Total Price Total Price Total Price Total Price Total Price Total Price Total Price Total Price Total Price Total 5a Curb and Edge Mill (full profile 2" to 0") 5950 SY $ 3.00 $ 17,850.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 5.00 $ 29,750.00 $ - 5b Transition Mill (2" to 0" in 50') 572 SY $ 5.00 $ 2,860.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3.00 $ 1,716.00 $ - 5c 2" HMA Commercial Grade Class A 650 tons $ 125.00 $ 81,250.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 115.00 $ 74,750.00 $ - 5d Manhole Adjustment 2 EA $ 1,500.00 $ 3,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 715.00 $ 1,430.00 $ - 5e Valve Box Adjustment 2 EA $ 1,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,090.00 $ 2,180.00 $ - Total Bid Item #5 $ 106,960.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 109,826.00 $ -

6 Sidewalk East 22nd Street (HMC to Wheatland) Base Quantity Unit Price Total Price Total Price Total Price Total Price Total Price Total Price Total Price Total Price Total Price Total 6a Curb & Gutter 15.0 LF $ 40.00 $ 600.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 90.00 $ 1,350.00 $ 25.00 $ 375.00 $ 22.25 $ 333.75 $ - 6b Sidewalk 4" 4860.0 SF $ 5.50 $ 26,730.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 4.75 $ 23,085.00 $ 6.00 $ 29,160.00 $ 4.85 $ 23,571.00 $ - 6c Truncated Dome Surface for ADA Ramps 8.0 SF $ 40.00 $ 320.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 50.00 $ 400.00 $ 50.00 $ 400.00 $ 173.00 $ 1,384.00 $ - Subtotal East 22nd Add Alternate $ 27,650.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 24,835.00 $ 29,935.00 $ 25,288.75 $ -

13th and Golden Belt - Add Alternate Quantity Unit Price Total Price Total Price Total Price Total Price Total Price Total Price Total Price Total Price Total Price Total 6.1a Curb & Gutter 18.0 LF $ 40.00 $ 720.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 90.00 $ 1,620.00 $ 35.00 $ 630.00 $ 33.25 $ 598.50 $ - 6.1b Sidewalk 4" 1175.0 SF $ 6.00 $ 7,050.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 4.75 $ 5,581.25 $ 12.00 $ 14,100.00 $ 7.35 $ 8,636.25 $ - 6.1c Sidewalk Curb 15.0 LF $ 30.00 $ 450.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 75.00 $ 1,125.00 $ 35.00 $ 525.00 $ 21.50 $ 322.50 $ - 6.1d Truncated Dome Surface for ADA Ramps 8.0 SF $ 40.00 $ 320.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 50.00 $ 400.00 $ 75.00 $ 600.00 $ 173.00 $ 1,384.00 $ - Subtotal 13th and Golden Belt Add Alternate $ 8,540.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 8,726.25 $ 15,855.00 $ 10,941.25 $ -

13th and Agnes - Add Alternate Quantity Unit Price Total Price Total Price Total Price Total Price Total Price Total Price Total Price Total Price Total Price Total 6.2a Curb & Gutter 15.0 LF $ 40.00 $ 600.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 90.00 $ 1,350.00 $ 35.00 $ 525.00 $ 22.60 $ 339.00 $ - 6.2b Sidewalk 4" 1385.0 SF $ 6.00 $ 8,310.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 4.75 $ 6,578.75 $ 7.00 $ 9,695.00 $ 7.00 $ 9,695.00 $ - 6.2c Sidewalk Curb 15.0 LF $ 30.00 $ 450.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 75.00 $ 1,125.00 $ 35.00 $ 525.00 $ 22.60 $ 339.00 $ - 6.2d Truncated Dome Surface for ADA Ramps 8.0 SF $ 40.00 $ 320.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 50.00 $ 400.00 $ 50.00 $ 400.00 $ 173.00 $ 1,384.00 $ - Subtotal 13th and Agnes Add Alternate $ 9,680.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 9,453.75 $ 11,145.00 $ 11,757.00 $ -

TOTAL Base Bid #6 plus two Add Alternates $ 45,870.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 43,015.00 $ 56,935.00 $ 47,987.00 $ -

7 Pavement Markings - Vine Street (13th to 29th) Quantity Unit Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total 7a Durable Pavement Marking-4” Yellow 9990 LF $ 0.60 $ 5,994.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 0.45 $ 4,495.50 7b Durable Pavement Marking-12” Yellow 96 LF $ 9.00 $ 864.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 4.50 $ 432.00 7c Durable Pavement Marking-6” White 3927 LF $ 1.00 $ 3,927.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 0.75 $ 2,945.25 7d Durable Pavement Marking-24” White 1623 LF $ 18.00 $ 29,214.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 23.00 $ 37,329.00 7e Durable Pavement Marking - Arrows 48 EA $ 400.00 $ 19,200.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 525.00 $ 25,200.00 7f Pavement Marking Removal 1 LS $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 23,000.00 $ 23,000.00 7g Mobilization 1 LS $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 25,500.00 $ 25,500.00 Total Bid Item #7 $ 84,199.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 118,901.75