Doubly Screened Hybrid Functional: an Accurate First-Principles

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Doubly Screened Hybrid Functional: an Accurate First-Principles Letter Cite This: J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2018, 9, 2338−2345 pubs.acs.org/JPCL Doubly Screened Hybrid Functional: An Accurate First-Principles Approach for Both Narrow- and Wide-Gap Semiconductors Zhi-Hao Cui, Yue-Chao Wang, Min-Ye Zhang, Xi Xu, and Hong Jiang* Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Rare Earth Material Chemistry and Application, Institute of Theoretical and Computational Chemistry, College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Peking University, 100871 Beijing, China ABSTRACT: First-principles prediction of electronic band structures of materials is crucial for rational material design, especially in solar-energy-related materials science. Hybrid functionals that mix the Hartree−Fock exact exchange with local or semilocal density functional approximations have proven to be accurate and efficient alternatives to more sophisticated Green’s function-based many-body perturbation theory. The optimal fraction of the exact exchange, previously often treated as an empirical parameter, is closely related to the screening strength of the system under study. From a physical point of view, ϵ the screening has two extreme forms: the dielectric screening [1/ M] that is dominant in wide-gap materials and the Thomas−Fermi metallic screening [exp(−ζr) ] that is important in narrow-gap semiconductors. In this work, we have systematically investigated the performances of a nonempirical doubly screened hybrid (DSH) functional that considers both screening mechanisms and found that it excels all other existing hybrid functionals and describes the band gaps of narrow-, medium-, and wide-gap insulating systems with comparably good performances. n recent years, first-principles electronic structure theory, the band gaps of wide-gap insulators. Similar problems also − I represented by density functional theory (DFT) in the local exist for other hybrid functionals with fixed parameters.24 26 density approximation (LDA) or various generalized gradient Many-body perturbation theory in the GW approxima- approximations (GGAs), has gained tremendous popularity in tion27,28 has been systematically developed in the past decades − condensed matter physics and materials science.1 3 However, and is regarded as one of the most accurate approaches to − the widely used local/semilocal approximate functionals have electronic band structure properties of materials.4,29 31 Unlike long been plagued by the systematic underestimation of the many other methods, the GW method is able to describe the band gap of insulating materials,4,5 especially for narrow-gap band gaps of various normal insulating materials with essentially semiconductors (NGS), which are often wrongly described as comparable accuracy. One of the most important features of the metallic. Furthermore, closely related to this so-called “band GW method is its capability to accurately describe screening Downloaded via PEKING UNIV on August 7, 2019 at 07:50:41 (UTC). gap problem”, the first-principles description of a lot of other effects of different strength in different materials. The success of properties, such as the defect formation energy6 and the the hybrid functionals can also be rationalized based on the GW − 26,32,33 ionization potential of semiconducting materials,7 12 also description of screening effects. In particular, it has been − α exhibits significant errors. In contrast, hybrid functionals that noted that the fraction of the Hartree Fock exact exchange HF See https://pubs.acs.org/sharingguidelines for options on how to legitimately share published articles. mix a fraction of Hartree−Fock (HF) exact exchange with is closely related to the screening strength of the system, as ϵ LDA/GGAs can provide significant improvement for those described by its macroscopic dielectric constant ( M), which is α properties as well as the band gap. Commonly used hybrid system-dependent. On the basis of such a link between HF and 13,14 ϵ functionals such as PBE0, which incorporates 1/4 of the M, several new hybrid functional approaches have been 26,32−36 Hartree−Fock exact exchange, HSE,15,16 which is similar to proposed recently. In this work, we further exploit the PBE0 but uses a screened Coulomb interaction for the exact link between the GW approach and the hybrid functionals and exchange part with an empirically determined screening emphasize the importance of considering both dielectric parameter, and the well-known B3LYP functional,17,18 have screening (dominant in insulators) and short-range metallic been widely tested in description of the band gap and screening (important for NGSs) in the hybrid functional − thermodynamic properties of semiconductors.19 23 Despite framework for accurate description of both NGSs and wide-gap fi semiconductors. their signi cantly improved performances in describing the 26,32,37 electronic band structure of typical semiconductors with respect As has been realized by many researchers, the success to LDA/GGA,23 the accuracy of each hybrid functional tends to of the hybrid functional approach to the band gap problem can be limited to a certain class of materials. For example, the HSE functional with the empirically determined screening parameter Received: March 26, 2018 performs very well in describing semiconductors with the band Accepted: April 19, 2018 gap falling in the range of 1−3 eV but tends to underestimate Published: April 19, 2018 © 2018 American Chemical Society 2338 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b00919 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2018, 9, 2338−2345 The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters Letter be attributed to its relation to the GW approach. In particular, it different nature in the hybrid functional framework, it is crucial can be regarded as a further approximation to the Coulomb to consider both dielectric and metallic screenings with system- hole and screened exchange (COHSEX) approximation to the dependent screening parameters. For that purpose, we take a GW exchange−correlation self-energy, which can be obtained similar strategy as that in ref 34 and use a simple model by neglecting the frequency dependence of the screened dielectric function44 Coulomb interaction W in the GW self-energy28 ⎡ ⎛ ⎞2⎤−1 1 ⎢ −1 ⎜ q ⎟ ⎥ Σxc(,rr′=− ) δν()[(,)(,;0) r −′ r rr ′−W rr ′ ω = ] ϵ=+ϵ−+()q 1⎢ (M 1) α⎜ ⎟ ⎥ 2 ⎝ q ⎠ ⎣ TF ⎦ (5) Nocc − ψψ()rrrr* (′′= )W (, ; ω 0) − ∑ ii where qTF denotes the Thomas -Fermi screening parameter i=1 and α = 1.563 is an empirical parameter introduced to better describe the dielectric function of typical semiconductors ≡ΣCOH(,rr ′ ) +Σ SEX (, rr ′ ) (1) according to ref 44. The corresponding screened Coulomb The screened Coulomb potential W above is defined as potential takes the form of W(,rr′= ;ωων ) d r ″ϵ″−1 (, rr ; )( r ″′ , r ) dq 41π ∫ (2) νsc(,rr′= ) ∫ exp(iqr·−′ ( r )) (2π )32q ϵ()q − where ϵ 1(r,r″;ω) is the inverse dielectric function and ν(r″,r′) ⎛ ⎞ 11 1 exp(−q̃ |−′|rr ) denotes the bare Coulomb potential. In the following = +−⎜1 ⎟ TF ν ′ ϵ|−′|rr ⎝ ϵ ⎠ |−′|rr formalism, we use sc(r,r ) to denote the static approximation MM ν ′ ≡ ′ ω ff to W, i.e., sc(r,r ) W(r,r ; =0) . The main e ect of the (6) ff inverse dielectric function is to reduce the e ective strength of where q̃ is defined as an effective Thomas−Fermi screening electron−electron interaction, and the simplest approximation TF − parameter is to replace ϵ 1(r,r″) by a constant scaling factor equal to the ϵ 2 ⎛ ⎞ inverse of the macroscopic dielectric constant 1/ M, such that q 1 q̃ 2 ≡ TF ⎜ + 1⎟ 1 TF ⎝ ⎠ α ϵ−M 1 (7) ΣSEX(,rr′≈− ) γν(, rr′′ )(, rr ) ϵM (3) It is obvious that in eq 6 the first term corresponds to the where we introduce the first-order reduced density matrix dielectric screening, which considers the full range of a scaled Coulomb interaction, and the second term represents the Nocc γ(,rr′≡ )∑ ψψ () r* ( r′ ) metallic screening, which considers only the short-range ii contribution. To simplify the implementation, we further use i=1 (4) the complementary error function (erfc) to approximate the When approximating the local COH term by LDA or GGA, second term in eq 6 following ref 34 this gives the dielectric-dependent hybrid (DDH) func- ⎛ ⎞ tional.26,32 Marques et al.32 proposed using 1/ϵ calculated at 11 1 erfc(μ|−′|rr ) M ν (,rr′≈ ) +−⎜1 ⎟ the LDA/GGA level as the system-dependent α and obtained sc ⎝ ⎠ HF ϵ|−′|MMrr ϵ |−′|rr (8) quite good agreement with experiment for many semi- 26 conductors. Skone et al. found that a self-consistent 2qTF̃ α with μ = . Using the screened Coulomb interaction with determination of HF can further improve the agreement with 3 experiment for theoretical prediction of band gaps of typical sp both dielectric and metallic screening considered above, we − insulating materials.26 The self-consistent DDH functional has obtain the following doubly screened hybrid (DSH) exchange − been used for a variety of different systems33,38 41 and also correlation potential extended to finite systems.42 ⎛ ⎞ 1 1 From a physical point of view, the DDH approach only VVDSH(,rr′= ) HF(, rr′+ )⎜ 1 − ⎟ VHF,SR(, rr′ ;μ ) xc x ⎝ ⎠ x grasps one aspect of screenings in real solids, i.e., that of the ϵM ϵM dielectric screening, which is dominant in wide-gap insulators. ⎛ ⎞ 1 It is therefore not surprising that the most significant +−⎜1 ⎟VVPBE,LR(;rrμ )+ PBE () ⎝ ⎠ x c improvement of the DDH approach compared to PBE0 is ϵM (9) observed in systems with large band gaps. For the latter, the fi α where PBE0 approach, with a xed HF = 0.25, often underestimates the band gap.26,32 In contrast, the DDH approach uses HF,SR erfc(μ|−′|rr ) significantly larger α for those systems due to their smaller V (,rr′=−′ ;μγ ) (, rr ) HF x (10) dielectric constants and therefore predicts significantly larger |−′|rr 35 PBE,LR band gaps that are in better agreement with experiment.
Recommended publications
  • Jaguar 5.5 User Manual Copyright © 2003 Schrödinger, L.L.C
    Jaguar 5.5 User Manual Copyright © 2003 Schrödinger, L.L.C. All rights reserved. Schrödinger, FirstDiscovery, Glide, Impact, Jaguar, Liaison, LigPrep, Maestro, Prime, QSite, and QikProp are trademarks of Schrödinger, L.L.C. MacroModel is a registered trademark of Schrödinger, L.L.C. To the maximum extent permitted by applicable law, this publication is provided “as is” without warranty of any kind. This publication may contain trademarks of other companies. October 2003 Contents Chapter 1: Introduction.......................................................................................1 1.1 Conventions Used in This Manual.......................................................................2 1.2 Citing Jaguar in Publications ...............................................................................3 Chapter 2: The Maestro Graphical User Interface...........................................5 2.1 Starting Maestro...................................................................................................5 2.2 The Maestro Main Window .................................................................................7 2.3 Maestro Projects ..................................................................................................7 2.4 Building a Structure.............................................................................................9 2.5 Atom Selection ..................................................................................................10 2.6 Toolbar Controls ................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • Density Functional Theory for Transition Metals and Transition Metal Chemistry
    REVIEW ARTICLE www.rsc.org/pccp | Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics Density functional theory for transition metals and transition metal chemistry Christopher J. Cramer* and Donald G. Truhlar* Received 8th April 2009, Accepted 20th August 2009 First published as an Advance Article on the web 21st October 2009 DOI: 10.1039/b907148b We introduce density functional theory and review recent progress in its application to transition metal chemistry. Topics covered include local, meta, hybrid, hybrid meta, and range-separated functionals, band theory, software, validation tests, and applications to spin states, magnetic exchange coupling, spectra, structure, reactivity, and catalysis, including molecules, clusters, nanoparticles, surfaces, and solids. 1. Introduction chemical systems, in part because its cost scales more favorably with system size than does the cost of correlated WFT, and yet Density functional theory (DFT) describes the electronic states it competes well in accuracy except for very small systems. This of atoms, molecules, and materials in terms of the three- is true even in organic chemistry, but the advantages of DFT dimensional electronic density of the system, which is a great are still greater for metals, especially transition metals. The simplification over wave function theory (WFT), which involves reason for this added advantage is static electron correlation. a3N-dimensional antisymmetric wave function for a system It is now well appreciated that quantitatively accurate 1 with N electrons. Although DFT is sometimes considered the electronic structure calculations must include electron correlation. B ‘‘new kid on the block’’, it is now 45 years old in its modern It is convenient to recognize two types of electron correlation, 2 formulation (more than half as old as quantum mechanics the first called dynamical electron correlation and the second 3,4 itself), and it has roots that are almost as ancient as the called static correlation, near-degeneracy correlation, or non- Schro¨ dinger equation.
    [Show full text]
  • Hands-On Workshop Density- Functional Theory and Beyond
    Hands-on Workshop Density- Functional Theory and Beyond First-Principles Simulations of Molecules and Materials Report Held at the Harnack-Haus of the Max Planck Society Berlin, Germany, July 13 - July 23, 2015 Organizers: Carsten Baldauf, Volker Blum, and Matthias Scheffler Contents 1 Report 1 2 Financial report 3 3 Program 4 4 Participants list 8 5 Poster abstracts 11 ii 1 Report The ten-day school on “Density-Functional Theory and Beyond” was held from July 13 to 23, 2015. 113 participants (speakers, tutors, and regular participants, predominantly gradu- ate students and early-stage postdocs) met at Harnack House in Berlin to learn and discuss about electronic-structure theory, from the basics to advanced topics. Its broad scope and the combination of lectures and practical session are hallmarks of this series of events and makes it attractive to the international community, which resulted in about two-times more applications for participations than we were able to accept. The 70 students were instructed in 26 lectures that were given by internationally-renowned scientists. Besides the lectures, practical sessions in front of computers were mainly conducted by the 19 tutors from Fritz Haber Institute (Berlin, Germany), Duke University (Durham, NC, USA), and Aalto Uni- versity (Helsinki, Finland). The main computational workhorse for the afternoon sessions was the FHI-aims all-electron code. The overall workshop, however, is not designed to teach a single code, but rather to introduce scientific concepts and workflows. The program is designed
    [Show full text]
  • Numerical Methods for Kohn–Sham Density Functional Theory
    Acta Numerica (2019), pp. 405{539 c Cambridge University Press, 2019 doi:10.1017/S0962492919000047 Printed in the United Kingdom Numerical methods for Kohn{Sham density functional theory Lin Lin∗ Department of Mathematics, University of California, Berkeley, and Computational Research Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA E-mail: [email protected] Jianfeng Luy Department of Mathematics, Department of Physics, and Department of Chemistry, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA E-mail: [email protected] Lexing Yingz Department of Mathematics and Institute for Computational and Mathematical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA E-mail: [email protected] Kohn{Sham density functional theory (DFT) is the most widely used elec- tronic structure theory. Despite significant progress in the past few decades, the numerical solution of Kohn{Sham DFT problems remains challenging, especially for large-scale systems. In this paper we review the basics as well as state-of-the-art numerical methods, and focus on the unique numerical challenges of DFT. ∗ Partially supported by the US National Science Foundation via grant DMS-1652330, and by the US Department of Energy via grants DE-SC0017867 and DE-AC02- 05CH11231. y Partially supported by the US National Science Foundation via grants DMS-1454939 and ACI-1450280 and by the US Department of Energy via grant DE-SC0019449. z Partially supported by the US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Advanced Scientific Computing Research, the `Scientific Discovery through Ad- vanced Computing (SciDAC)' programme and the US National Science Foundation via grant DMS-1818449. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core.
    [Show full text]
  • TDDFT As a Tool in Chemistry II
    TDDFT as a tool in chemistry Summer School on “Time dependent Density-Functional Theory: Prospects and Applications” Benasque, Spain September 2008 Ivano Tavernelli EPFL CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland Program (lectures 1 and 2) Definitions (chemistry, photochemistry and photophysics) The Born-Oppenheimer approximation potential energy surfaces (PES) Methods for excited states in quantum chemistry Lecture 1 - HF, TDHF - Configuration interaction, CI - Coupled Cluster, CC - MCSCF TDDFT: Why TDDFT in chemistry and biology? TDDFT: properties and applications in chemistry TDDFT failures Lecture 2 - Accuracy and functionals - charge transfer excitations - topology of the PES Lecture 3: Introduction to Non-adiabatic mixed-quantum classical molecular dynamics Why TDDFT in chemistry? All MR ab-initio methods are still computationally too expensive for large systems (they are limited to few tenths of atoms) and for mixed-quantum classical dynamics. Among the SR (plus perturbation) methods: CIS is practically no longer used in the calculation of excitation energies in molecules. The error in the correlation energy is usually very large and give qualitatively wrong results. STILL good to gain insight on CT state energies! Largely replaced by TDDFT CC2 Is a quite recent development and therefore not widely available Accurate and fast, is the best alternative to TDDFT Good energies also for CT states Among the MR methods, CASSCF is still widely used but is computationally very expensive and the quality of the excited state energies and properties are not necessarily better than the ones obtained from a TDDFT calculation. In addition, all SCF based methods need what is called “chemical intuition” in the construction of the active space.
    [Show full text]
  • THESIS DFT CALCULATIONS for CADMIUM TELLURIDE (Cdte)
    THESIS DFT CALCULATIONS FOR CADMIUM TELLURIDE (CdTe) Submitted by Sai Avinash Pochareddy Department of Mechanical Engineering In partial fulfilment of the requirements For the Degree of Master of Science Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado Fall 2019 Master’s Committee: Advisor: Sampath Walajabad Co-Advisor: Chris Weinberger James Sites Copyright by Sai Avinash Pochareddy 2019 All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT APPLYING QUANTUM ATK TO PERFORM DFT CALCULATIONS ON CADMIUM TELLURIDE (CdTe) Cadmium Telluride (CdTe) thin film photovoltaics (PV) has demonstrated low Levelized Cost of Energy (LCOE). CdTe technology also counted for half the thin film market in 2013 [3]. CdTe PV has the smallest carbon footprint and the energy payback time (less than one year) is the shortest of any current photovoltaic technology. The modules made of CdTe can also be recycled at the end of their lifetime. The attractiveness of these materials comes from their bandgap value (1.5 eV), which falls within the solar spectrum, thereby enabling the efficient creation of electron-hole pairs (or excitons) by solar photons. This has led to the research that dates back to 1950’s and is currently ongoing in many parts of the world. A simple heterojunction cell design was evolved in which p-type CdTe was matched with n-type Cadmium Sulfide (CdS) and by adding the top and bottom contacts. Today, multiple crystalline layers, of thicknesses ranging from a few nanometers (nm) to tens of micrometers (µm), are added to improve the efficiencies of the CdTe PV cells. The highest cell efficiency recorded to date is over 22%. Different computational tools and methods are used to study these effects, with Quantum ESPRESSO and VASP being used for many years now.
    [Show full text]
  • Jaguar User Manual
    Jaguar User Manual Jaguar 7.6 User Manual Schrödinger Press Jaguar User Manual Copyright © 2009 Schrödinger, LLC. All rights reserved. While care has been taken in the preparation of this publication, Schrödinger assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions, or for damages resulting from the use of the information contained herein. Canvas, CombiGlide, ConfGen, Epik, Glide, Impact, Jaguar, Liaison, LigPrep, Maestro, Phase, Prime, PrimeX, QikProp, QikFit, QikSim, QSite, SiteMap, Strike, and WaterMap are trademarks of Schrödinger, LLC. Schrödinger and MacroModel are registered trademarks of Schrödinger, LLC. MCPRO is a trademark of William L. Jorgensen. Desmond is a trademark of D. E. Shaw Research. Desmond is used with the permission of D. E. Shaw Research. All rights reserved. This publication may contain the trademarks of other companies. Schrödinger software includes software and libraries provided by third parties. For details of the copyrights, and terms and conditions associated with such included third party software, see the Legal Notices for Third-Party Software in your product installation at $SCHRODINGER/docs/html/third_party_legal.html (Linux OS) or %SCHRODINGER%\docs\html\third_party_legal.html (Windows OS). This publication may refer to other third party software not included in or with Schrödinger software ("such other third party software"), and provide links to third party Web sites ("linked sites"). References to such other third party software or linked sites do not constitute an endorsement by Schrödinger, LLC. Use of such other third party software and linked sites may be subject to third party license agreements and fees. Schrödinger, LLC and its affiliates have no responsibility or liability, directly or indirectly, for such other third party software and linked sites, or for damage resulting from the use thereof.
    [Show full text]
  • Jaguar User Manual
    Jaguar User Manual Jaguar 7.7 User Manual Schrödinger Press Jaguar User Manual Copyright © 2010 Schrödinger, LLC. All rights reserved. While care has been taken in the preparation of this publication, Schrödinger assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions, or for damages resulting from the use of the information contained herein. Canvas, CombiGlide, ConfGen, Epik, Glide, Impact, Jaguar, Liaison, LigPrep, Maestro, Phase, Prime, PrimeX, QikProp, QikFit, QikSim, QSite, SiteMap, Strike, and WaterMap are trademarks of Schrödinger, LLC. Schrödinger and MacroModel are registered trademarks of Schrödinger, LLC. MCPRO is a trademark of William L. Jorgensen. Desmond is a trademark of D. E. Shaw Research. Desmond is used with the permission of D. E. Shaw Research. All rights reserved. This publication may contain the trademarks of other companies. Schrödinger software includes software and libraries provided by third parties. For details of the copyrights, and terms and conditions associated with such included third party software, see the Legal Notices for Third-Party Software in your product installation at $SCHRODINGER/docs/html/third_party_legal.html (Linux OS) or %SCHRODINGER%\docs\html\third_party_legal.html (Windows OS). This publication may refer to other third party software not included in or with Schrödinger software ("such other third party software"), and provide links to third party Web sites ("linked sites"). References to such other third party software or linked sites do not constitute an endorsement by Schrödinger, LLC. Use of such other third party software and linked sites may be subject to third party license agreements and fees. Schrödinger, LLC and its affiliates have no responsibility or liability, directly or indirectly, for such other third party software and linked sites, or for damage resulting from the use thereof.
    [Show full text]
  • 10.11648.J.Ajpc.20190802.12.Pdf
    American Journal of Physical Chemistry 2019; 8(2): 41-49 http://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/j/ajpc doi: 10.11648/j.ajpc.20190802.12 ISSN: 2327-2430 (Print); ISSN: 2327-2449 (Online) Structural and DFT Studies on Molecular Structure of Pyridino-1-4-η-cyclohexa-1,3-diene and 2-Methoxycyclohexa-1,3-diene Irontricarbonyl Complexes Olawale Folorunso Akinyele 1, *, Timothy Isioma Odiaka 2, Isiah Ajibade Adejoro 2 1Department of Chemistry, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria 2Department of Chemistry, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria Email address: *Corresponding author To cite this article: Olawale Folorunso Akinyele, Timothy Isioma Odiaka, Isiah Ajibade Adejoro. Structural and DFT Studies on Molecular Structure of Pyridino-1-4-η-cyclohexa-1, 3-diene and 2-Methoxycyclohexa-1, 3-diene Irontricarbonyl Complexes. American Journal of Physical Chemistry. Vol. 8, No. 2, 2019, pp. 41-49. doi: 10.11648/j.ajpc.20190802.12 Received : April 25, 2019; Accepted : June 24, 2019; Published : September 25, 2019 Abstract: We report a molecular simulation of Pyridino-1-4-η-cyclohexa-1,3-diene and 2-methoxycyclohexa-1,3-diene irontricarbonyl complexes. In this work we employed the Density Functional Theory (DFT) in our calculations to predict the dipole moment, spectra, HOMO-LUMO energies, and chemical reactivity parameters including chemical potential, global chemical hardness, electrophilicity index and polarizability revealing that the complexes are highly reactive. The calculated values were compared with the available experimental values for these compounds as a means of validation. A very good agreement has been obtained between B3LYP theoretical results and the experimental results. We also calculated the excitation wavelength with time-dependent density functional theory and observed a mixture of singlet-singlet and singlet to triplet excitation energies.
    [Show full text]
  • Full Papers Are from Archives of RSR & KRK
    Available online at www.joac.info ISSN: 2278-1862 Journal of Applicable Chemistry 2016, 5(1): 21-110 (International Peer Reviewed Journal) Perspective Review Computational Quantum Chemistry (CQC) Part 2: Anticancer/anti-HIV drugs and DFT studies with Jaguar K. Ramakrishna1*, B. Venkata Sasidhar1 andR. Sambasiva Rao2 1. Department of Chemistry, Gitam Institute of Science, Gitam University, Visakhapatnam, 530 017, INDIA 2 School of Chemistry, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam 530 003, INDIA Email: [email protected], [email protected] Accepted on 10thJanuary2016 _____________________________________________________________________________ ABSTRACT Background: The FDA approved marketeddrugs for cancer and HIV increased the life span and comfort of patients. The motto of inventing better molecules to render AIDS-free and cancer-free human life and reducing the suffering is key in looking for new leads and toxic free/ high potency molecules for clinical trials. The results of CQC, structure activity relationships (SXR), HTS/virtual libraries, docking and conformer generators lead to complimentary and supplementary information in drug discovery to routine prescription through clinical trials. Earlier, we carried out the synthesis of substituted Uracil-5- Sulphonamides and confirmed their structures from spectral studies. Scope of study: The quantum chemical investigations and biological (anti-cancer/anti-HIV) activity in vitro of four synthesized substituted Uracil-5-sulphonamides derivatives are reported. Chemical models with CQC: The geometry optimization, chemical validity of CQC model, single point electronic point energies and physico-chemical properties of substituted aroyl sulphonamides are computed with Jaguar package of Schrodinger software suit. The level of theory employed is DFT with B3LYP hybrid functional for both optimization and vibrational frequency analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Advances in Molecular Quantum Chemistry Contained in the Q-Chem 4 Program Package
    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Previously Published Works Title Advances in molecular quantum chemistry contained in the Q-Chem 4 program package Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9wn3w79b Journal Molecular Physics, 113(2) ISSN 0026-8976 Authors Shao, Y Gan, Z Epifanovsky, E et al. Publication Date 2015 DOI 10.1080/00268976.2014.952696 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Molecular Physics An International Journal at the Interface Between Chemistry and Physics ISSN: 0026-8976 (Print) 1362-3028 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tmph20 Advances in molecular quantum chemistry contained in the Q-Chem 4 program package Yihan Shao, Zhengting Gan, Evgeny Epifanovsky, Andrew T.B. Gilbert, Michael Wormit, Joerg Kussmann, Adrian W. Lange, Andrew Behn, Jia Deng, Xintian Feng, Debashree Ghosh, Matthew Goldey, Paul R. Horn, Leif D. Jacobson, Ilya Kaliman, Rustam Z. Khaliullin, Tomasz Kuś, Arie Landau, Jie Liu, Emil I. Proynov, Young Min Rhee, Ryan M. Richard, Mary A. Rohrdanz, Ryan P. Steele, Eric J. Sundstrom, H. Lee Woodcock III, Paul M. Zimmerman, Dmitry Zuev, Ben Albrecht, Ethan Alguire, Brian Austin, Gregory J. O. Beran, Yves A. Bernard, Eric Berquist, Kai Brandhorst, Ksenia B. Bravaya, Shawn T. Brown, David Casanova, Chun-Min Chang, Yunqing Chen, Siu Hung Chien, Kristina D. Closser, Deborah L. Crittenden, Michael Diedenhofen, Robert A. DiStasio Jr., Hainam Do, Anthony D. Dutoi, Richard G. Edgar, Shervin Fatehi, Laszlo Fusti-Molnar, An Ghysels, Anna Golubeva- Zadorozhnaya, Joseph Gomes, Magnus W.D. Hanson-Heine, Philipp H.P. Harbach, Andreas W. Hauser, Edward G. Hohenstein, Zachary C.
    [Show full text]
  • Jaguar User Manual
    Jaguar User Manual Jaguar 8.8 User Manual Schrödinger Press Jaguar User Manual Copyright © 2015 Schrödinger, LLC. All rights reserved. While care has been taken in the preparation of this publication, Schrödinger assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions, or for damages resulting from the use of the information contained herein. Canvas, CombiGlide, ConfGen, Epik, Glide, Impact, Jaguar, Liaison, LigPrep, Maestro, Phase, Prime, PrimeX, QikProp, QikFit, QikSim, QSite, SiteMap, Strike, and WaterMap are trademarks of Schrödinger, LLC. Schrödinger, BioLuminate, and MacroModel are registered trademarks of Schrödinger, LLC. MCPRO is a trademark of William L. Jorgensen. DESMOND is a trademark of D. E. Shaw Research, LLC. Desmond is used with the permission of D. E. Shaw Research. All rights reserved. This publication may contain the trademarks of other companies. Schrödinger software includes software and libraries provided by third parties. For details of the copyrights, and terms and conditions associated with such included third party software, use your browser to open third_party_legal.html, which is in the docs folder of your Schrödinger software installation. This publication may refer to other third party software not included in or with Schrödinger software ("such other third party software"), and provide links to third party Web sites ("linked sites"). References to such other third party software or linked sites do not constitute an endorsement by Schrödinger, LLC or its affiliates. Use of such other third party software and linked sites may be subject to third party license agreements and fees. Schrödinger, LLC and its affiliates have no responsibility or liability, directly or indirectly, for such other third party software and linked sites, or for damage resulting from the use thereof.
    [Show full text]