Irene, Doornkloof, Pole-Evans 666 (PRE, 0002 Pretoria

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Irene, Doornkloof, Pole-Evans 666 (PRE, 0002 Pretoria 204 Bothalia 42,2 (2012) TABLE 1.—Differences between Agrostis eriantha var. eriantha and A. eriantha var. planifolia Character A. eriantha var. eriantha A. eriantha var. planifolia Character reliability Leaf blade Folded. Flat. Could be artefact of pressing. Glumes (apices) Acute to acuminate. Acute. Overlapping character insufficient to distin- guish between two taxa. Lemma Hairy. glabrous, margins hairy. Variability of hairiness cannot be assessed on just two specimens. Palea ± Equal to slightly shorter than Shorter than lemma. Overlapping character, not sufficient to lemma. distinguish varieties. 1 1 Callus Hairs up to /3 the lemma Hairs up to /2 the lemma length, Character variable throughout genus, and length, but variable. variability uncertain due to small too variable to constitute a reliable differ- sample size. ence between these varieties. DISCuSSIOn AnD COnCLuSIOn ACKnOWLEDgEMEnTS Agrostis lachnantha was divided into two varieties, A. The Botanical Education Trust is gratefully acknowl- lachnantha var. lachnantha and A. lachnantha var. gla- edged for the financial award that was granted to the bra on the basis of hairiness of the lemma by goossen Taxonomic Problems in Plants of Conservation Impor- & Papendorf (1945). However it was later found, and tance Project. We would like to thank Mrs Lorraine confirmed in this investigation, that hairs on the lemma Mills of the Department of nature Conservation, gau- are variable in length and cannot reliably be used to dis- teng, for fieldwork assistance, and Mrs Lyn Fish of tinguish varieties. The variety was therefore reduced to SAnBI for assistance and advice throughout this project. synonymy under A. lachnantha (gibbs Russell et al. 1990). REFEREnCES The results of our investigations suggest that vari- ation in callus hair length is not a reliable character to gIBBS RuSSELL, g.E., WATSOn, L., KOEKEMOER, M., SMOOK, use to distinguish between taxa in Agrostis eriantha. L., BARKER, n.P., AnDERSOn, H.M. & DALLWITZ, M.J. given that A. eriantha var. planifolia has never been 1990. grasses of southern Africa. Memoirs of the Botanical Sur- recollected (with the exception of one other specimen vey of South Africa no. 58. national Botanic gardens/Botanical Research Institute, Pretoria. from the type locality), it is probable that it is an aber- gOOSSEn, A.P. & PAPEnDORF, M.C. 1945. The genus Agrostis. rant form. Agrostis eriantha var. planifolia is therefore South African Journal of Science 41: 181–184. reduced to synonymy under A. eriantha. This species is HACKEL, E. 1904. Vierteljahresschrift der Naturforschenden Gesells- a widespread grass and the conservation status is con- chaft in Zürich 49: 172. firmed to be Least Concern. RAIMOnDO, D., VOn STADEn, L., FODEn, W., VICTOR, J.E., HELME, n.A., TuRnER, R.C., KAMUNDI, D.A. & MAnYA- Agrostis eriantha Hack. in Vierteljahresschrift der MA, P.A. (eds). 2009. Red List of South African plants. Strelitzia naturforschenden gesellschaft in Zürich 49: 172 (1904). 25. South African national Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria. VICTOR, J.E. 2006. Data Deficient flags for use in the Red List of Syntypes: South Africa, [gauteng], ‘in humidis prope South African plants. Bothalia 36: 85–86. Pretoria’, Jan. 1894, Schlechter 4144 (PRE, syn.!); [Eastern Cape], ‘in collibus prope Middleburg’, Dec. J.E. VICTOR*†, A.C. MASHAu*,**and V.J. ngOBEnI* 1893, Schlechter 4052 (PRE, syn.!). * Agrostis eriantha Hack. var. planifolia goossens & South African national Biodiversity Institute, Private Bag X101, 0001 Pretoria. E-mail: † j.victor @ sanbi.org.za / [email protected]. Papendorf:181 (1945), syn. nov. Type: South Africa, ** Student affiliation: Department of Botany, university of Pretoria, [gauteng], Irene, Doornkloof, Pole-Evans 666 (PRE, 0002 Pretoria. holo.!). MS. received: 2012-01-13. RuBIACEAE TAXOnOMIC nOTES On SERICANTHE ANDONGENSIS AnD A nEW COMBInation AnD statuS In SERICANTHE FROM LIMPOPO, SOuTH AFRICA Rubiaceae Juss. is one of the five largest families functionally unisexual and polysymmetric, often with of flowering plants with over 13 000 species (Bremer a narrow corolla tube and spreading lobes; the ovary is 2009) and belongs in the order gentianales Juss. ex inferior in most species, with a nectary or disc on top, Bercht. & J.Presl (APg III 2009; Reveal 2012b). Mem- except in members of tribe gaertnereae in subfamily bers of Rubiaceae can be recognized in the vegetative Rubioideae, which have a secondarily superior ovary state by their opposite, sometimes whorled, entire leaves (Jansen et al. 1996), and the fruit is baccate, drupaceous, and interpetiolar stipules with axillary colleters. The or capsular (Stevens 2001–[accessed December 2011]). flowers are usually bisexual or sometimes unisexual or There is strong molecular support for three subfamilies: Bothalia 42,2 (2012) 205 Cinchonoideae Raf., Dialypetalanthoideae Reveal chotrieae of subfamily Rubioideae), Pavetta (tribe [replacing Ixoroideae Raf. (Reveal 2012a)] and Rubio- Pavetteae of subfamily Dialypetalanthoideae) and Seri- ideae Bremek. ex Verdc. (Bremer & Eriksson 2009). canthe (Van Oevelen et al. 2001), however the nodules of Pavetta and Psychotria are usually punctate to ellip- The African genus Sericanthe Robbr. belongs in sub- soid, rarely only shortly linear. These galls house endo- family Dialypetalanthoideae—tribe Coffeeae DC. (Rob- symbiotic bacteria. The bacterial partners are strictly brecht & Puff 1986; Retief & Leistner 2000). Currently host specific and have been identified in Pavetta, Psy- tribe Coffeeae includes the southern African genera Cof- chotria, and recently also in Sericanthe andongensis fea L., Sericanthe Robbr., Tricalysia A.Rich. ex DC., (Hiern) Robbr. as Candidatus Burkholderia andongensis and the reinstated genus Empogona Hook.f. (Bridson and in S. petitii (n.Hallé) Robbr. as Candidatus Burkhol- 2003; Davis et al. 2007; Tosh et al. 2009). The tribe is deria petitii (Lemaire et al. 2011). characterized by very short stipules that are connate and apiculate; axillary inflorescences paired at nodes; rela- The only species of Sericanthe from South Africa tively small flowers; distinctly 2-lobed styles with diver- was formerly referred to Sericanthe andongensis (Hiern) gent arms; small, few-seeded, fleshy fruits; and seeds Robbr. var. andongensis (Robbrecht 1978; Coates Pal- with a deep ventral groove (Retief & Leistner 2000; grave 2002; Retief 2003, 2006; Klopper et al. 2006), Tosh et al. 2009). following Robbrecht (1978, 1988) who recognized two Tricalysia was more than 40 years ago considered as varieties of S. andongensis, namely var. andongensis a very broadly circumscribed genus. Hallé (1970) recog- and var. mollis Robbr. These two varieties grow more nized that several species were misplaced in Tricalysia or less sympatrically and differ in hairiness on their leaf and removed them to the new genus Neorosea n.Hallé. undersurfaces (var. andongensis with scattered hairs and Detailed revisionary work by Robbrecht (1978), how- var. mollis velutinous) and their leaf apices (var. andon- ever, showed that one of these species, N. jasminiflora gensis always has acuminate apices and var. mollis has (Klotzsch) n.Hallé (=Tricalysia jasminiflora (Klotzsch) rounded, obtuse to acute or occasionally subacuminate Benth. & Hook.f. ex Hiern), was in fact a Tricalysia. leaf apices). In her treatment of Sericanthe in Flora unfortunately this species was the one Hallé has chosen zambesiaca, Bridson (2003) redefined Robbrecht’s as the type of Neorosea, and Neorosea therefore became (1978, 1988) concept of var. andongensis and var. mollis a synonym of Tricalysia, while the remaining species for the plants occurring south of the Zambezi River. The were left without a generic name. Robbrecht (1978) varieties of subsp. andongensis grow ± sympatrically rectified this by publishing the new name Sericanthe. to the north of the Zambezi River but are geographi- Subsequently Tricalysia subgenus Empogona (Hook.f.) cally separated to the south. In Bridson’s opinion there Robbr. (1979) was raised to genus level, defined by the are five distinct taxa in Zimbabwe and South Africa: the very short calyx tube with well-developed lobes, corolla non-montane element is treated as subsp. engleri, which mostly bearded in the throat, and anthers with conspicu- is confined to the granite outcrops and serpentine hills of ously apical appendages (Tosh et al. 2009). The genus the Matobos, southwestern Zimbabwe, while the mon- Tricalysia, as currently defined, is one of the largest tane specimens have been grouped with other doubt- genera of Rubiaceae in Africa and occurs in continen- fully named specimens as three provisional species (see tal Africa (± 95 spp.), Madagascar (12 spp.) and the Sericanthe sp. A, sp. B, and sp. C). Bridson (2003: 512) Comoros (1 sp.) (Tosh et al. 2009). continued: ‘Tricalysia legatii Hutch., from South Africa, has not been included as a synonym of Sericanthe Sericanthe comprises 21 named species, confined andongensis var. andongensis because, in my opinion, to Sub-Saharan Africa (Klopper et al. 2006), with four recently described from Lower guinea (Sonke et al. it is both taxonomically and geographically discrete’. 2012). Sericanthe is distinguished from Tricalysia and She goes on to provide a few morphological differences Empogona by the presence of linear bacterial leaf galls between the South African taxon, Tricalysia legatii and or nodules (Van Oevelen et al. 2001), wing-shaped col- S. andongensis subsp. engleri (K.Krause) Bridson, the leters, pollen with a
Recommended publications
  • The Identity of Diplospora Africana (Rubiaceae)
    The identity of Diplospora africana (Rubiaceae) E. Robbrecht Nationale Plantentuin van Belgie, Domein van Bouchout, Meise, Belgium Diplospora africana Sim is shown to be a distinct species Introduction belonging to Tricalysia subg. Empogona sect. Kraussiopsis. When Sim (1907) dealt with Tricalysia in the Cape, he did It possesses the characteristics of this subgenus: Flowers not follow the delimitation of the genus proposed in with densely hairy corolla throat and appendiculate anthers, and fruits black at complete maturity. The necessary Schumann's (1891) account of the family (i.e. Diplospora and combination under the name Tricalysia and an amplified Kraussia are considered as sections of Trica/ysia) , but description of the species are provided. This rather rare distinguished between Diplospora (with tetramerous flowers), species is a Pondoland endemic separated by a wide Kraussia (pentamerous) and Tricalysia (hexamerous), stating interval from its Guineo-Congolian relatives. A key to the that this artifical distinction 'probably does not hold good species of Trica/ysia in South Africa is provided; T. africana elsewhere'. Sim recognized five species in South Africa: D . is easily distinguished from the five other southern African Trica/ysia species by its tetramerous flowers. ajricana Sim, K. lanceo/ata Sand. [ = T. lanceolata (Sand.) S. Afr. J. Bot. 1985, 51: 331-334 Burtt-Davy], K. jloribunda Harv., K. coriacea Sond. ( = T. sonderana Hiern) and T. capensis (Meisn.) Sim. While the Diplospora africana Sim is 'n maklik onderskeidbare spesie last four species are now well known elements of the South wat in Tricalysia subg. Empogona sect. Kraussiopsis African flora, Dip/ospora ajricana remained obscure and ingesluit word.
    [Show full text]
  • Albuca Spiralis
    Flowering Plants of Africa A magazine containing colour plates with descriptions of flowering plants of Africa and neighbouring islands Edited by G. Germishuizen with assistance of E. du Plessis and G.S. Condy Volume 62 Pretoria 2011 Editorial Board A. Nicholas University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, RSA D.A. Snijman South African National Biodiversity Institute, Cape Town, RSA Referees and other co-workers on this volume H.J. Beentje, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK D. Bridson, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK P. Burgoyne, South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria, RSA J.E. Burrows, Buffelskloof Nature Reserve & Herbarium, Lydenburg, RSA C.L. Craib, Bryanston, RSA G.D. Duncan, South African National Biodiversity Institute, Cape Town, RSA E. Figueiredo, Department of Plant Science, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, RSA H.F. Glen, South African National Biodiversity Institute, Durban, RSA P. Goldblatt, Missouri Botanical Garden, St Louis, Missouri, USA G. Goodman-Cron, School of Animal, Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, RSA D.J. Goyder, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK A. Grobler, South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria, RSA R.R. Klopper, South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria, RSA J. Lavranos, Loulé, Portugal S. Liede-Schumann, Department of Plant Systematics, University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany J.C. Manning, South African National Biodiversity Institute, Cape Town, RSA A. Nicholas, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, RSA R.B. Nordenstam, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Stockholm, Sweden B.D. Schrire, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK P. Silveira, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal H. Steyn, South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria, RSA P. Tilney, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, RSA E.J.
    [Show full text]
  • South Cameroon)
    Plant Ecology and Evolution 152 (1): 8–29, 2019 https://doi.org/10.5091/plecevo.2019.1547 CHECKLIST Mine versus Wild: a plant conservation checklist of the rich Iron-Ore Ngovayang Massif Area (South Cameroon) Vincent Droissart1,2,3,8,*, Olivier Lachenaud3,4, Gilles Dauby1,5, Steven Dessein4, Gyslène Kamdem6, Charlemagne Nguembou K.6, Murielle Simo-Droissart6, Tariq Stévart2,3,4, Hermann Taedoumg6,7 & Bonaventure Sonké2,3,6,8 1AMAP Lab, IRD, CIRAD, CNRS, INRA, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France 2Missouri Botanical Garden, Africa and Madagascar Department, P.O. Box 299, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-0299, U.S.A. 3Herbarium et Bibliothèque de Botanique africaine, C.P. 265, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Campus de la Plaine, Boulevard du Triomphe, BE-1050 Brussels, Belgium 4Meise Botanic Garden, Domein van Bouchout, Nieuwelaan 38, BE-1860 Meise, Belgium 5Evolutionary Biology and Ecology, Faculté des Sciences, C.P. 160/12, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 50 Avenue F. Roosevelt, BE-1050 Brussels, Belgium 6Plant Systematics and Ecology Laboratory, Higher Teachers’ Training College, University of Yaoundé I, P.O. Box 047, Yaoundé, Cameroon 7Bioversity International, P.O. Box 2008 Messa, Yaoundé, Cameroon 8International Joint Laboratory DYCOFAC, IRD-UYI-IRGM, BP1857, Yaoundé, Cameroon *Author for correspondence: [email protected] Background and aims – The rapid expansion of human activities in South Cameroon, particularly mining in mountainous areas, threatens this region’s exceptional biodiversity. To comprehend the effects of land- use change on plant diversity and identify conservation priorities, we aim at providing a first comprehensive plant checklist of the Ngovayang Massif, focusing on the two richest plant families, Orchidaceae and Rubiaceae.
    [Show full text]
  • Botanical Classification and Nomenclature an Introduction —
    Botanical classification and nomenclature an introduction — Marc S.M. Sosef Jérôme Degreef Henry Engledow Pierre Meerts Botanical classification and nomenclature an introduction — Marc S.M. Sosef Jérôme Degreef Henry Engledow Pierre Meerts by Marc S.M. Sosef1, Jérôme Degreef1,2, Henry Engledow1 & Pierre Meerts3 1 Meise Botanic Garden, Nieuwelaan 38, B-1860 Meise, Belgium 2 Service Général de l’Enseignement supérieur et de la Recherche scientifique, Fédération Wallonie-Bruxelles, Rue A. Lavallée 1, B-1080 Brussels, Belgium 3 Herbarium et bibliothèque de botanique africaine, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Av. F.D. Roosevelt 50, CP 265, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium Copyright © 2020 Meise Botanic Garden, Nieuwelaan 38, 1860 Meise, Belgium. Printed in Belgium by Gewadrupo, Arendonk. This publication is published and distributed in Open Access under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC-BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. A PDF file of this publication can be ordered, free of charge (send an email to [email protected]), or downloaded from the webshop of Meise Botanic Garden at http://shopbotanicgarden.weezbe.com. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3706707 CIP Royal Library Albert I, Brussels Botanical classification and nomenclature, an introduction. Marc S.M. Sosef, Jérôme Degreef, Henry Engledow & Pierre Meerts - Meise, Meise Botanic Garden, 2020. - 72 p.; ill.; 22 x 15 cm. ISBN 9789492663207 Subject: Botany D/2020/0325/002 Content Introduction . 5 1. The history of classification . 9 1.1 Theophrastus to the Middle Ages . 11 1.2 Renaissance, Pre-Linnean period . 13 1.3 Linnaeus and the Linnaeans .
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on the Plant Endemics of the Quartzitic Slopes of Mt Chimanimani
    Blumea 63, 2018: 87–92 ISSN (Online) 2212-1676 www.ingentaconnect.com/content/nhn/blumea RESEARCH ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.3767/blumea.2018.63.01.08 Notes on the plant endemics of the quartzitic slopes of Mt Chimanimani (Mozambique & Zimbabwe), and a new, Critically Endangered species, Empogona jenniferae (Rubiaceae-Coffeeae) M. Cheek1, H. Chipanga2, I. Darbyshire1 Key words Abstract Empogona jenniferae is described from the upper quartzitic slopes of Mt Chimanimani on both sides of the Zimbabwe-Mozambique border, a prospective Tropical Important Plant Area. Its conservation status is assessed conservation as Critically Endangered under the 2012 IUCN criteria. A figure and notes on the endemic plant species of Chimani- new combinations mani are provided. Two additional names in Empogona, E. congesta and E. congesta subsp. chasei are published. TIPA Tricalysia Published on 5 July 2018 Tropical Important Plant Area INTRODUCTION fl. bud 15.xii. 1967, Müller 728 (K; SRGH) and Chimanimani Mts., fr. 23.v.1923, Cronwright in Swynnerton 4026 (BR; K) Robbrecht monographed the Tricalysia A.Rich. ex DC. species stand apart. The leaf blades are somewhat thicker, somewhat of Africa in a series of publications. The first covered Tricalysia broader and the margins recurved. The calyx lobes touch or subg. Empogona (Robbrecht 1979). Subsequent to the Flora can be slightly spaced. The fruit is larger (c. 8 mm in diameter), Zambesiaca account of Tricalysia by Bridson (2003), Tosh appears leathery (? normal) and the disk is exposed. More et al. (2009) performed a molecular phylogenetic analysis of material is needed.” Tricalysia. Tricalysia subg. Empogona was shown to arise in a Wursten 1070 matched the two specimens from Chimanimani separate clade from subg.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Support for a Basal Grade of Morphologically
    TAXON 60 (4) • August 2011: 941–952 Razafimandimbison & al. • A basal grade in the Vanguerieae alliance MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS AND BIOGEOGRAPHY Molecular support for a basal grade of morphologically distinct, monotypic genera in the species-rich Vanguerieae alliance (Rubiaceae, Ixoroideae): Its systematic and conservation implications Sylvain G. Razafimandimbison,1 Kent Kainulainen,1,2 Khoon M. Wong, 3 Katy Beaver4 & Birgitta Bremer1 1 Bergius Foundation, Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences and Botany Department, Stockholm University, 10691 Stockholm, Sweden 2 Department of Botany, Stockholm University, 10691, Stockholm, Sweden 3 Singapore Botanic Gardens, 1 Cluny Road, Singapore 259569 4 Plant Conservation Action Group, P.O. Box 392, Victoria, Mahé, Seychelles Author for correspondence: Sylvain G. Razafimandimbison, [email protected] Abstract Many monotypic genera with unique apomorphic characters have been difficult to place in the morphology-based classifications of the coffee family (Rubiaceae). We rigorously assessed the subfamilial phylogenetic position and generic status of three enigmatic genera, the Seychellois Glionnetia, the Southeast Asian Jackiopsis, and the Chinese Trailliaedoxa within Rubiaceae, using sequence data of four plastid markers (ndhF, rbcL, rps16, trnT­F). The present study provides molecular phylogenetic support for positions of these genera in the subfamily Ixoroideae, and reveals the presence of a basal grade of morphologically distinct, monotypic genera (Crossopteryx, Jackiopsis, Scyphiphora, Trailliaedoxa, and Glionnetia, respectively) in the species-rich Vanguerieae alliance. These five genera may represent sole representatives of their respective lineages and therefore may carry unique genetic information. Their conservation status was assessed, applying the criteria set in IUCN Red List Categories. We consider Glionnetia and Jackiopsis Endangered. Scyphiphora is recognized as Near Threatened despite its extensive range and Crossopteryx as Least Concern.
    [Show full text]
  • Diplospora Should Be Separated From
    BLUMEA 35 (1991) 279-305 Remarks on the tropical Asian and Australian taxa included in Diplospora or Tricalysia (Rubiaceae — Ixoroideae — Gardenieae) S.J. Ali & E. Robbrecht Summary The Asian and Australian species generally included in Diplospora or Tricalysia are shown to form an artificial assemblage. A few species even do not belong to the Gardenieae-Diplosporinae and need to be transferred to other tribes of the Ixoroideae. So Diplospora malaccensis, Diplospora and the The minahassae, Tricalysia purpurea, Tricalysia sorsogonensis belong to Hypobathreae. three Australian members of the Pavetteae and transferred Tarenna. A Diplosporas are are to survey is given of the characters of the remaining Asian species of Diplospora/Tricalysia, demonstrating that these be accommodated under the African and 1) species cannot genus Tricalysia, 2)Discosper- mum, since a century included in the synonymy ofDiplospora, merits to be revived at generic rank. The differ in fruit size and fruit wall two genera placentation, texture, number of seeds per locule, seed and exotestal cell combinations shape, anatomy. Eight necessary new are provided: Diplospora puberula, Diplospora tinagoensis, Discospermum abnorme, Discospermum beccarianum,Discosper- mum whitfordii, Tarenna australis, Tarenna cameroni, and Tarenna triflora. An annotated check-list including the more than 100 names involved is given. 1. Introduction Present undertaken short-time study, as a postdoctoral research of the first author, intends to settle the problem of the generic position of the Asian species included in Tricalysia or Diplospora (Rubiaceae-Ixoroideae-Gardenieae-Diplosporinae). In- deed, it is not clear whether the Asian genus Diplospora should be separated from Tricalysia or not. Robbrecht (1979, 1982, 1983, 1987), when revising the African species of Tricalysia, left the question unanswered.
    [Show full text]
  • SABONET Report No 18
    ii Quick Guide This book is divided into two sections: the first part provides descriptions of some common trees and shrubs of Botswana, and the second is the complete checklist. The scientific names of the families, genera, and species are arranged alphabetically. Vernacular names are also arranged alphabetically, starting with Setswana and followed by English. Setswana names are separated by a semi-colon from English names. A glossary at the end of the book defines botanical terms used in the text. Species that are listed in the Red Data List for Botswana are indicated by an ® preceding the name. The letters N, SW, and SE indicate the distribution of the species within Botswana according to the Flora zambesiaca geographical regions. Flora zambesiaca regions used in the checklist. Administrative District FZ geographical region Central District SE & N Chobe District N Ghanzi District SW Kgalagadi District SW Kgatleng District SE Kweneng District SW & SE Ngamiland District N North East District N South East District SE Southern District SW & SE N CHOBE DISTRICT NGAMILAND DISTRICT ZIMBABWE NAMIBIA NORTH EAST DISTRICT CENTRAL DISTRICT GHANZI DISTRICT KWENENG DISTRICT KGATLENG KGALAGADI DISTRICT DISTRICT SOUTHERN SOUTH EAST DISTRICT DISTRICT SOUTH AFRICA 0 Kilometres 400 i ii Trees of Botswana: names and distribution Moffat P. Setshogo & Fanie Venter iii Recommended citation format SETSHOGO, M.P. & VENTER, F. 2003. Trees of Botswana: names and distribution. Southern African Botanical Diversity Network Report No. 18. Pretoria. Produced by University of Botswana Herbarium Private Bag UB00704 Gaborone Tel: (267) 355 2602 Fax: (267) 318 5097 E-mail: [email protected] Published by Southern African Botanical Diversity Network (SABONET), c/o National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X101, 0001 Pretoria and University of Botswana Herbarium, Private Bag UB00704, Gaborone.
    [Show full text]
  • Droissart Et Al Plant Ecol Evo
    Mine versus Wild : a plant conservation checklist of the rich Iron-Ore Ngovayang Massif Area (South Cameroon) Vincent Droissart, Olivier Lachenaud, Gilles Dauby, Steven Dessein, Gyslène Kamdem, Charlemagne Nguembou K., Murielle Simo-Droissart, Tariq Stévart, Hermann Taedoumg, Bonaventure Sonké To cite this version: Vincent Droissart, Olivier Lachenaud, Gilles Dauby, Steven Dessein, Gyslène Kamdem, et al.. Mine versus Wild : a plant conservation checklist of the rich Iron-Ore Ngovayang Massif Area (South Cameroon). Plant Ecology and Evolution, Botanic Garden Meise and Royal Botanical Society of Belgium, 2019, 152 (1), pp.8-29. 10.5091/plecevo.2019.1547. hal-02079407 HAL Id: hal-02079407 https://hal.umontpellier.fr/hal-02079407 Submitted on 26 Mar 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Plant Ecology and Evolution 152 (1): 8–29, 2019 https://doi.org/10.5091/plecevo.2019.1547 CHECKLIST Mine versus Wild: a plant conservation checklist of the rich Iron-Ore Ngovayang Massif Area (South Cameroon) Vincent Droissart1,2,3,8,*, Olivier Lachenaud3,4, Gilles Dauby1,5, Steven Dessein4, Gyslène Kamdem6, Charlemagne Nguembou K.6, Murielle Simo-Droissart6, Tariq Stévart2,3,4, Hermann Taedoumg6,7 & Bonaventure Sonké2,3,6,8 1AMAP Lab, IRD, CIRAD, CNRS, INRA, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France 2Missouri Botanical Garden, Africa and Madagascar Department, P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards a Phylogeny for Coffea (Rubiaceae): Identifying Well-Supported Lineages Based on Nuclear and Plastid DNA Sequences
    Annals of Botany 100: 1565–1583, 2007 doi:10.1093/aob/mcm257, available online at www.aob.oxfordjournals.org Towards a Phylogeny for Coffea (Rubiaceae): Identifying Well-supported Lineages Based on Nuclear and Plastid DNA Sequences OLIVIER MAURIN1,4, AARON P. DAVIS2,*, MICHAEL CHESTER1,5, ESTHER F. MVUNGI3 , YASMINA JAUFEERALLY-FAKIM6 and MICHAEL F. FAY1 1Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3DS, UK, 2Herbarium, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AB, UK, 3Department of Botany, University of Dar es Salaam, PO Box 35060, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, 4Department of Botany and Plant Biotechnology, University of Johannesburg, PO Box 524, Auckland Park, 2006, Gauteng, South Africa, 5School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary, University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, UK and 6Faculty of Agriculture, University of Mauritius, Reduit, Mauritius Received: 28 June 2007 Returned for revision: 25 July 2007 Accepted: 30 August 2007 Published electronically: 22 October 2007 † Background and Aims The phylogenetic relationships between species of Coffea and Psilanthus remain poorly understood, owing to low levels of sequence variation recovered in previous studies, coupled with relatively limited species sampling. In this study, the relationships between Coffea and Psilanthus species are assessed based on substantially increased molecular sequence data and greatly improved species sampling. † Methods Phylogenetic relationships are assessed using parsimony, with sequence data from four plastid regions [trnL–F intron, trnL–F intergenic spacer (IGS), rpl16 intron and accD–psa1 IGS], and the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of nuclear rDNA (ITS 1/5.8S/ITS 2). Supported lineages in Coffea are discussed within the context of geographical correspondence, biogeography, morphology and systematics.
    [Show full text]
  • IV International Rubiaceae (Gentianales) Conference
    H. Ochoterena, T. Terrazas, P. De Block & S. Dessein (editors) IV International Rubiaceae (Gentianales) Conference Programme & Abstracts 19-24 October 2008 Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico Meise National Botanic Garden (Belgium) Scripta Botanica Belgica Miscellaneous documentation published by the National Botanic Garden of Belgium Series editor: E. Robbrecht Volume 44 H. Ochoterena, T. Terrazas, P. De Block & S. Dessein (eds.) IV International Rubiaceae (Gentianales) Conference Programme & Abstracts CIP Royal Library Albert I, Brussels IV International Rubiaceae (Gentianales) Conference – Programme & Abstracts. H. Ochoterena, T. Terrazas, P. De Block & S. Dessein (eds.) – Meise, National Botanic Garden of Belgium, 2008. – 88 pp.; 22 x 15 cm. – (Scripta Botanica Belgica, Vol. 44) ISBN 9789072619785 ISSN 0779-2387 D/2008/0325/5 Copyright © 2008 National Botanic Garden of Belgium Printed in Belgium by Peeters, Herent ABSTRACTS ABSTRACTS The abstracts are arranged in alphabetic order according to the first author’s last name. The order is independent of whether the presentation is oral or a poster, which is indicated on the side. The presenting author is underlined and his/her e-mail is printed below the authors list. Key note speakers for the conference are: Thomas Borsch What do we know about evolution and diversity of the Coffee family’s most prominent member – Coffea arabica? Robert H. Manson Biocafé: developing sustainable management strategies that help balance biodiversity conservation and the socio-economic well- being of coffee farmers
    [Show full text]
  • Jaarverslag 2020, Plantentuin Meise Rapport Annuel 2020, Jardin Botanique De Meise Annual Report 2020, Meise Botanic Garden Plantentuin Meise
    Jaarverslag 2020 Jaarverslag — Plantentuin Meise Jaarverslag 2020, Plantentuin Meise Rapport annuel 2020, Jardin botanique de Meise Annual report 2020, Meise Botanic Garden Plantentuin Meise Jaarverslag 2020 Rapport annuel 2020, Jardin botanique de Meise Annual report 2020, Meise Botanic Garden 4 – 5 Voorwoord Avant-propos Foreword 6 – 7 Inleiding Introduction Introduction 8 – 18 Plantendiversiteit veiligstellen Préserver la diversité végétale Safeguarding plant biodiversity 19 – 38 Collecties bewaren, ontsluiten en valoriseren Sauvegarder, déverrouiller et valoriser les collections Preserving, unlocking and valorising collections 39 – 64 Plantendiversiteit ontdekken, onderzoeken en valoriseren Découvrir, explorer et valoriser la diversité végétale Discovering, exploring and valorising plant diversity 65 – 86 Inspireren en informeren Inspirer et informer Inspiring and informing 87 – 98 Bouwen aan state-of-the-art faciliteiten in een levend domein Construire des installations de pointe dans un domaine vivant 105 – 133 Building state-of-the-art facilities De Plantentuin in cijfers in a living domain Le Jardin botanique en chiffres The Botanic Garden in figures 99 – 104 Organisatie 134 – 139 Organisation Publicaties Organisation Publications Publications 140 – 142 Het Plantentuinteam L’équipe du Jardin The Garden’s team 143 – 147 Plantentuin Meise in een notendop Le Jardin botanique de Meise en quelques mots Meise Botanic Garden, a portrait Voorwoord 2020, in vele opzichten een bijzonder jaar Veranderingen en doordachte evoluties maken altijd deel uit van een goede bedrijfsplanning. Maar dit jaar overweldigde de plotse pandemie de hele wereld op verrassende wijze. 2020 werd onvergetelijk, als een onverwachte veranderings- factor in het leven van vele individuen en voor elke organisatie. Een nieuw leven, een nieuw gezicht In 2020 viel mij de eer te beurt om aangesteld te worden als nieuwe voorzitter van de raad van bestuur van Plantentuin Meise.
    [Show full text]