DOCSLIB.ORG

2018 - Daystar Worldwide Coverage

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2018 - Daystar Worldwide Coverage 2018 - DAYSTAR WORLDWIDE COVERAGE 20 % OTA Net Telco Telco 2018-2019 2018-2019 Nielsen Channel Digital Cable DirecTV DISH Telco AT&T Nielsen Designated Market Areas (DMA) Station Call Letters HD Over-the-Air (POP) Over-the-Air (HH) Non-Duplicated Verizon Frontier DMA Rank DMA HH # (Homes) (Homes) (Homes) Uverse (Homes) (Homes) (Homes) (Homes) WKOB-LD (Aff) 42.2 1 New York NY 5,276,600 16,519,563 6,432,607 1,286,521 3,898,514 696,833 413,571 1,636,547 15,961 WPXU-LD 12.1 KOCE-TV 50.3 2 Los Angeles CA 3,251,370 KPCD-LP 40 17,535,682 5,964,760 1,192,952 1,701,711 1,140,898 697,536 178,792 245,581 KSCD-LP 38 3 Chicago IL 2,816,850 WDCI-LD 57.1 9,562,681 3,821,802 764,360 1,712,314 458,387 283,748 281,050 WELL-LD 45.1 4 Philadelphia PA 2,622,070 5,949,460 2,410,220 482,044 1,612,384 230,194 142,189 679,182 W45CP-D 45.1 KDTN-DT 2.1 5 Dallas-Fort Worth TX 2,482,480 7,639,475 2,938,285 587,657 584,522 571,788 354,689 269,774 143,647 KPTD-LP 49 WDWA-LD 23.1 6 Washington DC (Hagerstown MD) 2,423,360 6,709,357 2,569,681 513,936 912,539 250,725 141,169 836,502 WDDN-LD 23.1 KLTJ-DT 22.1 7 Houston TX 2,414,470 6,891,760 2,616,092 523,218 739,770 460,656 284,228 246,339 KDHU-LD 50.1 KDAS-LP 48.1 8 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose CA 2,364,870 6,675,922 2,537,598 507,520 628,450 407,860 224,834 137,893 KDTS-LD 52.1 WYDN-DT 48.1 9 Boston MA (Manchester NH) 2,341,390 WMPX-LP 33 7,428,070 2,145,868 429,174 1,686,841 173,807 101,131 346,197 W40BO 40 WDTA-LD 35.1 10 Atlanta GA 1,875,420 5,818,842 2,286,108 457,222 957,294 399,454 256,121 229,834 WGGD-LD 23.1 11 Tampa-St Petersburg FL (Sarasota) 1,864,420 WSVT-LD 18.1 4,471,442 2,157,783 431,557 983,891 223,861 149,442 274,397 KDPH-LD 48.1 12 Phoenix (Prescott) AZ 1,854,810 4,484,626 1,840,582 368,116 681,907 427,766 279,129 KDTP-DT 11.1 13 Seattle-Tacoma WA 1,777,240 KWDK-DT 56.1 4,384,890 1,832,375 366,475 1,076,063 310,707 185,524 20,762 14 Detroit MI 1,713,310 WUDT-LD 23.1 5,569,562 2,457,108 491,422 851,862 227,952 146,713 173,739 15 Minneapolis-St Paul MN 1,697,840 WDMI-LD 62.1 3,495,210 1,413,467 282,693 192,923 345,290 211,497 1,341 16 Miami-Fort Lauderdale FL 1,585,270 W16CC-LD (Aff) 16.1 1,944,842 748,016 149,603 328,349 271,877 175,295 183,967 KDNF-LD 44.1 17 Denver CO 1,565,890 3,680,199 1,458,443 291,689 738,652 331,919 200,234 KRMT-DT 41.1 WDTO-LD 50.1 18 Orlando-Daytona Beach-Melbourne FL 1,399,470 WOCD-LP 27.1 3,840,750 1,586,557 317,311 799,340 228,419 152,957 73,274 WPXB-LD 50.1 19 Cleveland/Akron (Canton) OH 1,357,690 WCDN-LD 53.1 2,854,540 1,306,076 261,215 708,080 202,258 133,664 103,331 KACA-LP 34.1 20 Sacramento-Stockton-Modesto CA 1,164,400 4,146,938 1,511,003 302,201 285,487 284,790 175,395 59,377 KRJR-LP 44.1 KUMO-LD 51.1 21 St Louis MO 1,141,770 2,901,158 1,472,998 294,600 378,367 231,416 149,380 101,028 WPXS-DT 13.1 22 Portland OR 1,129,900 KPXG-LD 42.1 2,675,542 1,068,744 213,749 526,750 226,973 143,057 WDMC-LD 25.1 23 Charlotte NC 1,108,780 1,133,958 1,303,465 260,693 419,546 218,773 142,840 58,725 WHWD-LD 21.1 24 Pittsburgh PA 1,108,710 WPDN-LD 65.1 1,907,399 890,139 178,028 354,094 120,760 81,017 158,275 WDRN-LD 45.1 25 Raleigh-Durham (Fayetteville) NC 1,084,180 2,674,515 1,074,062 214,812 478,160 205,415 134,187 49,056 1,805 WWIW-LD 66.1 26 Baltimore MD 1,021,780 WWDD-LD 40.1 2,140,771 902,710 180,542 496,107 127,732 76,011 210,014 WRTN-LD (Aff) 6.1 27 Nashville TN 999,790 1,938,738 785,844 157,169 230,300 177,604 118,950 61,134 WNPX-LP 20 28 Indianapolis IN 987,760 WDTI-DT 69.1 2,774,652 1,179,591 235,918 397,703 198,924 130,478 89,847 29 San Diego CA 935,810 435,456 187,550 110,937 101,442 KSUD-LP 45.1 30 Salt Lake City, UT 923,990 2,454,207 817,688 163,538 278,980 229,681 142,966 KUTF-DT 12.1 31 San Antonio TX 909,420 KQVE-LD 46.1 2,183,091 799,743 159,949 296,688 187,258 119,568 73,105 32 Kansas City MO 897,870 KCDN-LD 35.1 271,530 167,994 108,871 65,624 33 Hartford & New Haven CT 889,600 435,261 86,770 50,878 138,314 WCLL-CD 19.1 34 Columbus OH 850,030 WXCB-CD (Aff) 45.1 2,465,281 1,022,021 204,404 411,679 158,266 102,147 59,642 319 WOCB-CD (Aff) 39.1 35 Cincinnati OH 848,420 WDYC-LD 36.1 2,454,506 1,056,056 211,211 502,909 130,194 83,749 921 2 36 Milwaukee WI 829,880 368,442 140,424 88,478 81,744 37 West Palm Beach-Ft Perce FL 805,920 WSLF-LD 35.1 1,631,274 767,093 153,419 212,138 176,391 110,929 76,369 38 Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson SC-Asheville SC 766,500 WSQY-LD 51.1 1,538,743 674,421 134,884 98,106 184,626 127,486 36,481 39 Las Vegas NV 751,650 KLVD-LD 23.1 2,026,136 838,119 167,624 333,953 147,490 97,034 40 Austin TX 705,190 KADT-LD 16.1 1,852,731 731,915 146,383 232,560 164,304 97,768 79,953 41 Harrisburg-Lancaster-Lebanon-York PA 681,330 294,593 88,607 56,873 46,753 42 Jacksonville-Brunswick FL 679,550 WUJF-LD 33.1 1,640,244 713,237 142,647 140,191 106,205 68,823 64,400 WBUN-LD 28.1 WSFG-LD (Aff) 38.1 43 Birmingham (Anniston and Tuscaloosa) AL 678,210 1,458,761 629,407 125,881 227,444 137,608 94,376 52,859 WSSF-LD (Aff) 15.1 W16CM-D (Aff) 16.1 44 Norfolk VA-Portsmouth-Newport News VA 676,720 WVAD-LD 25.1 1,693,697 696,848 139,370 328,565 91,317 59,063 126,567 45 Oklahoma City OK 675,130 KOCM-DT 46.1 1,658,089 696,053 139,211 218,129 146,518 96,479 31,648 46 Greensboro-High Point-Winston-Salem NC 650,890 333,662 117,687 81,586 17,282 47 Albuquerque-Santa Fe NM 647,190 KAZQ-LD (Aff) 32.5 1,104,096 474,095 94,819 137,502 179,512 122,099 48 Louisville KY 639,410 WDYL-LD 28.1 1,495,074 643,277 128,655 246,566 115,988 78,072 41,837 49 Grand Rapids-Kalamazoo-BattleCreek MI 624,020 WUHQ-LD 29.1 1,120,520 443,510 88,702 301,154 127,043 84,639 38,092 50 New Orleans LA 623,390 KNLD-LD 28.1 1,621,278 709,444 141,889 230,454 110,721 73,866 45,827 51 Memphis TN 586,930 WDNM-LD 59.1 1,375,456 578,065 115,613 176,776 131,015 88,522 40,043 WDTB-LD 39.1 52 Buffalo NY 580,120 1,284,028 585,119 117,024 312,890 83,685 57,051 57,978 WBBZ-TV (Aff) 7.2 53 Providence RI-New Bedford MA 568,920 306,167 31,153 18,953 176,197 KFVD-LP 15.1 54 Fresno-Visalia CA 554,430 2,753,421 886,006 177,201 147,732 131,072 87,581 16,911 KGMC-TV (Aff) 43.1 55 Ft Myers-Naples FL 551,850 234,769 112,801 70,750 56 Richmond-Petersburg VA 527,090 WRID-LD 48.1 1,744,420 720,142 144,028 191,436 81,319 51,994 126,047 57 Little Rock-Pine Bluff AR 524,390 KKAP-DT 36.1 1,050,305 469,369 93,874 107,937 128,886 89,771 29,258 58 Mobile AL-Pensacola (Ft Walt) FL 520,540 WDPM-DT 18.1 1,676,557 777,791 155,558 208,347 106,548 71,070 42,501 59 Albany-Schenectady-Troy NY 512,160 322,237 71,109 44,749 25,282 WDTT-LD 24.1 60 Knoxville TN 508,550 1,274,678 590,623 118,125 194,609 97,760 68,762 19,645 WKNX-TV (Aff) 7.2 61 Tulsa OK 481,390 KTZT-CD 29.1 941,505 405,558 81,112 142,041 113,144 76,911 12,909 62 Wilkes Barre-Scranton PA 464,340 W43CO-LD (Aff) 43.1 510,297 241,941 48,388 209,940 95,284 65,599 35 63 Lexington KY 463,430 142,151 97,137 67,053 64 Dayton OH 430,660 WLWD-LD 20.1 1,838,211 793,115 158,623 180,497 82,888 55,760 21,429 65 Flint Saginaw Bay City MI 425,800 218,073 66,951 46,873 13,647 66 Honolulu HI 421,480 KWBN-DT 44.1 719,185 256,533 51,307 330,903 50,510 29,165 67 Green Bay-Appleton WI 417,200 WGBD-LD 49.1 888,559 392,519 78,504 155,201 90,903 60,096 17,709 68 Roanoke-Lynchburg VA 405,260 147,990 92,697 63,674 69 Omaha NE 402,140 KOHA-LD (Aff) 48.1 974,283 404,253 80,851 209,651 68,140 43,312 70 Charleston-Huntington WV 401,510 WTSF-DT 44.1 441,157 365,420 73,084 169,539 77,668 55,314 2 71 Toledo OH 395,870 WDTJ-LD 68.1 1,584,034 697,954 139,591 190,588 62,184 41,818 13,704 72 Springfield, MO 392,920 KWBM-DT 31.1 680,690 319,109 63,822 73,872 113,601 80,891 9,285 73 Tucson AZ (Sierra Vista) 389,590 KPCE-LP 29 1,261,970 567,839 113,568 100,002 88,658 59,507 74 Columbia SC 383,590 WKDC-LD 50.1 935,630 402,363 80,473 135,996 79,713 54,212 19,270 75 Des Moines-Ames IA 382,780 108,883 102,376 65,109 76 Wichita-Hutchinson Plus KS 382,690 KWKD-LP 28.1 772,103 328,553 65,711 140,796 84,409 56,547 11,906 KQUP-DT 24.1 77 Spokane WA 375,600 KQUP-LD 47.1 744,532 309,605 61,921 40,254 103,710 71,647 KDYS-LD 32.1 78 Harlingen-Weslaco-Brownsville-McAllen TX 372,770 KRZG-CD (Aff) 35.8 442,283 170,109 34,022 118,242 83,028 58,893 843 79 Huntsville-Decatur (Florence) AL 352,070 WHVD-LD 67.1 1,139,939 498,780 99,756 114,353 73,027 49,348 13,589 80 Rochester NY 350,730 212,799 60,663 39,667 WNYI-DT 52.1 81 Syracuse NY 344,500 1,078,900 474,296 94,859 201,384 46,246 30,517 37,777 WDSS-LD 38.1 82 Champaign & Springfield-Decatur IL 341,190 138,607 66,046 43,946 6,263 WDDA-LP 6 83 Chattanooga TN 339,980 831,166 350,371 70,074 194,717 51,292 35,618 5,820 WCTD-LP 22.1 84 Portland-Auburn ME 338,770 WLLB-LD 15.1 436,971 436,971 87,394 261,968 60,061 39,910 85 El Paso TX (La Cruces) 338,240 KSCE-TV (Aff) 38.1 1,071,786 382,073 76,415 90,512 73,717 51,287 7,546 WDMW-LD 65.1 86 Madison WI 330,340 1,410,325 591,300 118,260 123,312 75,332 48,396 11,274 WMWD-LD 38.1 87 Cedar Rapids-Waterloo-Dubuque IA 324,020 94,549 70,071 44,968 88 Paducah KY-Cap Girardeau-Harrisburg MO-Mount Vernon IL 322,820 76,083 87,370 62,070 89 Waco-Temple-Bryan TX 322,610 95,813 84,519 56,529 90 Shreveport LA 319,930 59,492 90,644 62,797 3,722 91 Colorado Springs-Pueblo CO 306,770 164,524 66,723 43,302 92 Jackson MS 303,390 65,718 71,325 49,232 22,688 93 Savannah GA 302,330 59,115 65,760 44,023 94 Charleston SC 302,040 125,636 59,303 38,288 27,547 95 Myrtle Beach-Florence SC 294,260 114,725 54,428 38,423 1,044 96 Burlington-Plattsburgh NY 287,430 226,737 50,244 32,743 97
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Channel Affiliate Market Timeframe of Move Call
    TV Broadcasters’ Impact on New York Impact on NY 22 Broadcasters have an impact of $75.92 billion annually on New York’s economy. 144,600 Jobs 59 Commercial TV Stations Call Channel Affiliate Market Timeframe of Move W07BV 7 Religious Wilkes Barre-Scranton, PA (56) Phase 9: Mar 14, 2020 - May 1, 2020 W47AO-D 47 Independent Wilkes Barre-Scranton, PA (56) Phase 4: Jun 22, 2019 - Aug 2, 2019 WNEP-TV 16 ABC Wilkes Barre-Scranton, PA (56) Phase 4: Jun 22, 2019 - Aug 2, 2019 WOLF-TV 56 FOX Wilkes Barre-Scranton, PA (56) Phase 4: Jun 22, 2019 - Aug 2, 2019 WQPX-TV 64 ION Media Networks Wilkes Barre-Scranton, PA (56) Phase 4: Jun 22, 2019 - Aug 2, 2019 WSWB 38 CW Television Network Wilkes Barre-Scranton, PA (56) Phase 4: Jun 22, 2019 - Aug 2, 2019 WYLN-LP 35 Yto Wilkes Barre-Scranton, PA (56) Phase 4: Jun 22, 2019 - Aug 2, 2019 WYOU 22 CBS Wilkes Barre-Scranton, PA (56) Phase 9: Mar 14, 2020 - May 1, 2020 WCNY-TV 24 Public Television Syracuse, NY (85) Phase 4: Jun 22, 2019 - Aug 2, 2019 WHSU-CD 51 Independent Syracuse, NY (85) Phase 8: Jan 18, 2020 - Mar 13, 2020 WIXT-CD 40 Cornerstone Television Network Syracuse, NY (85) Phase 8: Jan 18, 2020 - Mar 13, 2020 WNYI 52 Daystar TV Network Syracuse, NY (85) Phase 4: Jun 22, 2019 - Aug 2, 2019 WNYS-TV 43 My Network TV Syracuse, NY (85) Phase 8: Jan 18, 2020 - Mar 13, 2020 WONO-CD 11 Cornerstone Television Network Syracuse, NY (85) Phase 8: Jan 18, 2020 - Mar 13, 2020 WSPX-TV 56 ION Media Networks Syracuse, NY (85) Phase 4: Jun 22, 2019 - Aug 2, 2019 WSTM-TV 3 NBC Syracuse, NY (85) Phase 4: Jun 22,
    [Show full text]
  • President Ready to Sign Measure to Take up Gold
    ;v' ■ •^} f *r F air wM i M a g tanp^hiM^j tora toBipitt Wai^aadagr fair. , , ) V ■ VOL. LIIU NO. 102. (Claaaiflad AdrartfalBf oa Pact lA.) MANCHESTER. CONN.. TUESDAY. JANUARY 80. 1934. (TWELVE PAGES) PRICE THREE CEN«9[ ^ •.'Jl GRAND LIST IS $ 4 1 ,8 3 8 PRESIDENT READY BOmiDAY BALL Mary Guarded From ^^Kidnapers’’ IL L S SCORES TO BE SEASON'S ASSESSMENTS SHRINK TO SIGN MEASURE EVENTJTOWN r a S n e a r l y s i x m i l u o n s TO TAKE UP GOLD Expect 800 Penou at Ar­ Former Secretary of Trea^ WOULDUSEVETS Abstract Total, .AonooDeed Reserres Action on Derahi' SUNNY SOUTH HIT mory Tonight — Entor- ary P ei^ Oat Perfls of FOR AUTO SURVEY Today by Board of Asses­ taimnoit to Start at Ooe Mao Role—Criddzes sors, Shows Decrease ing the Dolbr Penna* BY FRIGID SPELL nently UntO DetaiU Are 8 o’clock, Grand March, 9. dieNRAAIte. State Oficial Declares 2,000 from Last Year of 85,* Could Be Employed If the 612,349— Cbeoey Fqore Arranged by the Federal Coldest Weather ef Whiter AQ is In r«diBeM for on* of the Topeka, Kas., Jan. 86.—(AP) — outstanding social event! tvar held Denouncing “executive pdlctator- Government Approves. Cat $1,468,223. Reierre Syaem. Reported Along the GnK; in Manchester—the President’! ■hip,” Ogden L. Mills, former secre­ Birthday Ball—^whlch Is expected to tary of the Treasury reviewed the attract an attendance of close to program of the Rowvelt adminis­ Hartford, Jan. 80.— (AP)—If the The Board of Asseasors annoime- Chicago Snffers M ost 800 persons to the State Armory 'xy- Waahlnfton, Jan.
    [Show full text]
  • The Seattle Foundation Annual Report Donors & Contributors 3
    2008 The Seattle Foundation Annual Report Donors & Contributors 3 Grantees 13 Fiscal Sponsorships 28 Financial Highlights 30 Trustees and Staff 33 Committees 34 www.seattlefoundation.org | (206) 622-2294 While the 2008 financial crisis created greater needs in our community, it also gave us reason for hope. 2008 Foundation donors have risen to the challenges that face King County today by generously supporting the organizations effectively working to improve the well-being of our community. The Seattle Foundation’s commitment to building a healthy community for all King County residents remains as strong as ever. In 2008, with our donors, we granted more than $63 million to over 2000 organizations and promising initiatives in King County and beyond. Though our assets declined like most investments nationwide, The Seattle Foundation’s portfolio performed well when benchmarked against comparable endowments. In the longer term, The Seattle Foundation has outperformed portfolios comprised of traditional stocks and bonds due to prudent and responsible stewardship of charitable funds that has been the basis of our investment strategy for decades. The Seattle Foundation is also leading efforts to respond to increasing need in our community. Late last year The Seattle Foundation joined forces with the United Way of King County and other local funders to create the Building Resilience Fund—a three-year, $6 million effort to help local people who have been hardest hit by the economic downturn. Through this fund, we are bolstering the capacity of selected nonprofits to meet increasing basic needs and providing a network of services to put people on the road on self-reliance.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a Stations Transitioning on June 12
    APPENDIX A STATIONS TRANSITIONING ON JUNE 12 DMA CITY ST NETWORK CALLSIGN LICENSEE 1 ABILENE-SWEETWATER SWEETWATER TX ABC/CW (D KTXS-TV BLUESTONE LICENSE HOLDINGS INC. 2 ALBANY GA ALBANY GA NBC WALB WALB LICENSE SUBSIDIARY, LLC 3 ALBANY GA ALBANY GA FOX WFXL BARRINGTON ALBANY LICENSE LLC 4 ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY ADAMS MA ABC WCDC-TV YOUNG BROADCASTING OF ALBANY, INC. 5 ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY ALBANY NY NBC WNYT WNYT-TV, LLC 6 ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY ALBANY NY ABC WTEN YOUNG BROADCASTING OF ALBANY, INC. 7 ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY ALBANY NY FOX WXXA-TV NEWPORT TELEVISION LICENSE LLC 8 ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY PITTSFIELD MA MYTV WNYA VENTURE TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, LLC 9 ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY SCHENECTADY NY CW WCWN FREEDOM BROADCASTING OF NEW YORK LICENSEE, L.L.C. 10 ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY SCHENECTADY NY CBS WRGB FREEDOM BROADCASTING OF NEW YORK LICENSEE, L.L.C. 11 ALBUQUERQUE-SANTA FE ALBUQUERQUE NM CW KASY-TV ACME TELEVISION LICENSES OF NEW MEXICO, LLC 12 ALBUQUERQUE-SANTA FE ALBUQUERQUE NM UNIVISION KLUZ-TV ENTRAVISION HOLDINGS, LLC 13 ALBUQUERQUE-SANTA FE ALBUQUERQUE NM PBS KNME-TV REGENTS OF THE UNIV. OF NM & BD.OF EDUC.OF CITY OF ALBUQ.,NM 14 ALBUQUERQUE-SANTA FE ALBUQUERQUE NM ABC KOAT-TV KOAT HEARST-ARGYLE TELEVISION, INC. 15 ALBUQUERQUE-SANTA FE ALBUQUERQUE NM NBC KOB-TV KOB-TV, LLC 16 ALBUQUERQUE-SANTA FE ALBUQUERQUE NM CBS KRQE LIN OF NEW MEXICO, LLC 17 ALBUQUERQUE-SANTA FE ALBUQUERQUE NM TELEFUTURKTFQ-TV TELEFUTURA ALBUQUERQUE LLC 18 ALBUQUERQUE-SANTA FE CARLSBAD NM ABC KOCT KOAT HEARST-ARGYLE TELEVISION, INC.
    [Show full text]
  • Declaration Under Section 4 (4) of the Telecommunication (Broadcasting and Cable) Services Interconnection (Addressable System) Regulation, 2017 (No
    Version 1.0/2019 Declaration Under Section 4 (4) of The Telecommunication (Broadcasting and Cable) Services Interconnection (Addressable System) Regulation, 2017 (No. 1 of 2017) 4(4)a: Target Market Distribution Network Location States/Parts of State covered as "Coverage Area" Bangalore Karnataka Bhopal Madhya Pradesh Delhi Delhi; Haryana; Rajasthan and Uttar Pradesh Hyderabad Telangana Kolkata Odisha; West Bengal; Sikkim Mumbai Maharashtra 4(4)b: Total Channel carrying capacity Distribution Network Location Capacity in SD Terms Bangalore 506 Bhopal 358 Delhi 384 Hyderabad 456 Kolkata 472 Mumbai 447 Kindly Note: 1. Local Channels considered as 1 SD; 2. Consideration in SD Terms is clarified as 1 SD = 1 SD; 1 HD = 2 SD; 3. Number of channels will vary within the area serviced by a distribution network location depending upon available Bandwidth capacity. 4(4)c: List of channels available on network List attached below in Annexure I 4(4)d: Number of channels which signals of television channels have been requested by the distributor from broadcasters and the interconnection agreements signed Nil Page 1 of 37 Version 1.0/2019 4(4)e: Spare channels capacity available on the network for the purpose of carrying signals of television channels Distribution Network Location Spare Channel Capacity in SD Terms Bangalore Nil Bhopal Nil Delhi Nil Hyderabad Nil Kolkata Nil Mumbai Nil 4(4)f: List of channels, in chronological order, for which requests have been received from broadcasters for distribution of their channels, the interconnection agreements
    [Show full text]
  • Wind Power Geoplanner™ Off-Air TV Analysis
    Wind Power GeoPlanner™ Off-Air TV Analysis Crown City Wind Energy Project Prepared on Behalf of Air Energy TCI Inc September 28, 2012 Air Energy TCI Inc Wind Power GeoPlanner™ Off-Air Television Report Crown City Wind Energy Project Table of Contents 1. Introduction - 1 - 2. Summary of Results - 1 - 3. Impact Assessment - 7 - 4. Recommendations - 7 - 5. Contact Us - 7 - 6. Appendix A - 8 - Comsearch Proprietary - 0 - September 28, 2012 Air Energy TCI Inc Wind Power GeoPlanner™ Off-Air Television Report Crown City Wind Energy Project 1. Introduction In this report, Comsearch analyzed the off-air television stations whose service could potentially be affected by the proposed Crown City Wind Energy Project in Cortland County, New York. Off-air stations are television broadcasters that transmit signals that can be received directly on a television receiver from terrestrially located broadcast facilities. Comsearch examined the coverage of the off-air TV stations and the communities in the area that could potentially have degraded television reception because of the location of the proposed wind energy projects. 2. Summary of Results The proposed wind energy project area and local communities are depicted in Figure 1 on the next page. Comsearch Proprietary - 1 - September 28, 2012 Air Energy TCI Inc Wind Power GeoPlanner™ Off-Air Television Report Crown City Wind Energy Project Figure 1: Wind Farm Project Area and Local Communities Comsearch Proprietary - 2 - September 28, 2012 Air Energy TCI Inc Wind Power GeoPlanner™ Off-Air Television Report Crown City Wind Energy Project To begin the analysis, Comsearch compiled all off-air television stations 1 within 150 kilometers of the wind project area of interest (AOI).
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 85, No. 103/Thursday, May 28, 2020
    32256 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 103 / Thursday, May 28, 2020 / Proposed Rules FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS closes-headquarters-open-window-and- presentation of data or arguments COMMISSION changes-hand-delivery-policy. already reflected in the presenter’s 7. During the time the Commission’s written comments, memoranda, or other 47 CFR Part 1 building is closed to the general public filings in the proceeding, the presenter [MD Docket Nos. 19–105; MD Docket Nos. and until further notice, if more than may provide citations to such data or 20–105; FCC 20–64; FRS 16780] one docket or rulemaking number arguments in his or her prior comments, appears in the caption of a proceeding, memoranda, or other filings (specifying Assessment and Collection of paper filers need not submit two the relevant page and/or paragraph Regulatory Fees for Fiscal Year 2020. additional copies for each additional numbers where such data or arguments docket or rulemaking number; an can be found) in lieu of summarizing AGENCY: Federal Communications original and one copy are sufficient. them in the memorandum. Documents Commission. For detailed instructions for shown or given to Commission staff ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. submitting comments and additional during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and SUMMARY: In this document, the Federal information on the rulemaking process, must be filed consistent with section Communications Commission see the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION 1.1206(b) of the Commission’s rules. In (Commission) seeks comment on several section of this document. proceedings governed by section 1.49(f) proposals that will impact FY 2020 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: of the Commission’s rules or for which regulatory fees.
    [Show full text]
  • T-Band Update Report
    A NPSTC Public Safety Communications Report T-Band Update Report May 31, 2016 The National Public Safety Telecommunications Council is a federation of organizations whose mission is to improve public safety communications and interoperability through collaborative leadership. The member organizations of the National Public Safety Telecommunications Council are grateful to the Department of Homeland Security's Science and Technology Directorate, Office for Interoperability and Compatibility (OIC), and the National Protection and Programs Directorate, Office of Emergency Communications (OEC), for their support. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................. 2 1. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 3 2. DEMAND FOR T-BAND SPECTRUM ............................................................................................ 4 3. IMPACT TO THE PUBLIC ........................................................................................................... 7 4. UPDATE ON T-BAND RELOCATION OPTIONS ...........................................................................12 4.1 MOVE TO AN ALTERNATIVE PUBLIC SAFETY LAND MOBILE BAND ........................................................12 4.2 RELOCATE TO THE NATIONWIDE PUBLIC SAFETY BROADBAND NETWORK (NPSBN) .................................16 5. TV AND B/ILT OPERATIONS IN THE T-BAND ............................................................................17
    [Show full text]
  • Marcus Lamb, Founder and President of Daystar Television Network
    Marcus Lamb, Founder and President of Daystar Television Network Marcus Lamb, founder and president of Daystar Television Network, was born October 7, 1957 in Cordele, Georgia and raised in Macon, Georgia. At the age of 15, in the summer of 1973, he began preaching as an evangelist. Upon skipping his senior year of high school in 1974, at the age of 16, Marcus enrolled in Lee University in Cleveland, Tennessee on a full scholarship. At age 19, he began his final senior semester at the private liberal arts school and graduated Magna Cum Laude. In December of 1981, Marcus Lamb founded Word of God Fellowship in Macon. He married Joni Trammell of Greenville, South Carolina in 1982, and she began to travel full time with him as they ministered in more than 20 states. As an evangelist, Marcus quoted so many scriptures in his sermons that many began referring to him as the “Walking Bible.” While on a trip to Israel in 1983, God spoke to Marcus Lamb and told him to found a Christian television station in Montgomery, Alabama. In 1985, Marcus built WMCF-TV, “45 Alive,” in Montgomery. It was the first Christian TV station in the state, and Marcus was the youngest person in the country to build a full power television station. In 1990, the Lambs moved to Dallas, Texas, to build KMPX-TV 29. Through a series of miracles and divine favor, TV 29 went on the air full power in September of 1993. Daystar Television Network officially launched in 1997 with a live broadcast of T.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Examining the Use of Theatre Among Children and Youth in U.S
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School November 2019 Mini-Actors, Mega-Stages: Examining the Use of Theatre among Children and Youth in U.S. Evangelical Megachurches Carla Elisha Lahey Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the Dramatic Literature, Criticism and Theory Commons, and the Other Theatre and Performance Studies Commons Recommended Citation Lahey, Carla Elisha, "Mini-Actors, Mega-Stages: Examining the Use of Theatre among Children and Youth in U.S. Evangelical Megachurches" (2019). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 5101. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/5101 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. MINI-ACTORS, MEGA-STAGES: EXAMINING THE USE OF THEATRE AMONG CHILDREN AND YOUTH IN U.S. EVANGELICAL MEGACHURCHES A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The School of Theatre by Carla Elisha Lahey B.A., Samford University, 2000 M.S., Florida State University, 2012 December 2019 Acknowledgements For the past three years of this project, I have been dreaming of writing this page. Graduate school has not the easiest path, but many people walked along the road with me. I have looked forward to completing this project so I could thank them within the pages they helped to make possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Channel Guide Essentials
    TM Optik TV Channel Guide Essentials Fort Grande Medicine Vancouver / Kelowna / Prince Dawson Victoria / Campbell Essential Channels Call Sign Edmonton Lloydminster Red Deer Calgary Lethbridge Kamloops Quesnel Cranbrook McMurray Prairie Hat Whistler Vernon George Creek Nanaimo River ABC Seattle KOMODT 131 131 131 131 131 131 131 131 131 131 131 131 131 131 131 131 131 AMI-audio* AMIPAUDIO 889 889 889 889 889 889 889 889 889 889 889 889 889 889 889 889 889 AMI-télé* AMITL 2288 2288 2288 2288 2288 2288 2288 2288 2288 2288 2288 2288 2288 2288 2288 2288 2288 AMI-tv* AMIW 888 888 888 888 888 888 888 888 888 888 888 888 888 888 888 888 888 APTN (West)* ATPNP 9125 9125 9125 9125 9125 9125 9125 9125 9125 9125 9125 9125 9125 9125 9125 9125 — APTN HD* APTNHD 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 — BC Legislative TV* BCLEG — — — — — — — — 843 843 843 843 843 843 843 843 843 CBC Calgary* CBRTDT 100 100 100 CBC Edmonton* CBXTDT 100 100 — 100 100 CBC Lloydminster* CKSADT — — 100 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — CBC News Network CBNEWHD 800 800 800 800 800 800 800 800 800 800 800 800 800 800 800 800 800 CBC Vancouver* CBUTDT 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 CBS Seattle KIRODT 133 133 133 133 133 133 133 133 133 133 133 133 133 133 133 133 133 CFJC* CFJCDT — — — — — — — — — 115 106 — — — — — — CHAT* CHATDT — — — — — — — 122 — — — — — — — — — CHEK* CHEKDT — — — — — — — — 121 121 121 121 121 121 121 121 121 City Calgary* CKALDT 106 106 106 — City Edmonton* CKEMDT 106 106 106 106 106 — City Vancouver* CKVUDT 106 106 — 106 106 106
    [Show full text]
  • Comments of the National Association of Broadcasters
    Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) 2018 Quadrennial Regulatory Review -- ) MB Docket No. 18-349 Review of the Commission’s Broadcast ) Ownership Rules and Other Rules Adopted ) Pursuant to Section 202 of the ) Telecommunications Act of 1996 ) COMMENTS OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS Rick Kaplan Jerianne Timmerman Erin Dozier Patrick McFadden Larry Walke Emily Gomes Daniel McDonald Theresa Ottina Loren White NAB Research September 2, 2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY .................................................................................... 1 II. THE FCC SHOULD FOCUS IN THS PROCEEDING ON ENSURING THE COMPETITIVE VIABLITY OF LOCAL STATIONS ....................................................................................... 6 III. THE FCC’S DECADES-OLD OWNERSHIP RULES HAVE NEVER SUCCESSFULLY PROMOTED DIVERSE OWNERSHIP OF RADIO AND TELEVISION STATIONS .................. 9 The FCC’s Rules Do Not Address The Central Challenge To New Entry And Diverse Ownership In Broadcasting, Which Is Access To Capital .................... 10 The FCC’s Ownership Rules Affirmatively Undermine Investment In Broadcasting And New Entry ............................................................................ 15 IV. REFORM OF THE OWNERSHIP RULES WOULD PROMOTE LOCALISM BY SAFEGUARDING THE VIABILITY OF LOCAL BROADCAST JOURNALISM IN TODAY’S BIG TECH-DOMINATED MARKETPLACE .............................................................................. 19 The FCC Cannot Ignore The
    [Show full text]