The Bees of Sub-Saharan Africa
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Christophe Praz Evolutionary Entomology University of Neuchatel 2000 Neuchâtel Born 20.08.1979 [email protected] 2010-Pr
Christophe Praz Evolutionary Entomology University of Neuchatel 2000 Neuchâtel Born 20.08.1979 [email protected] 2010-present Lecturer at University of Neuchatel 2008-2010 Postdoctoral fellow ("prospective researcher"), Department of Entomology, Cornell University, USA (Supervision Bryan Danforth). 2004-2008 PhD at ETH Zurich (Supervision Andreas Müller). 1999-2003 Master in biologie, University of Bern. Scientific publications 28. Lucchetti, M., V Kilchenmann, G Glauser, CJ Praz and C Kast 2018. Nursing protects honeybee larvae from secondary metabolites of pollen. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: in press. 27. Dorchin A., M Lopez-Uribe, CJ Praz, TL Griswold and BN Danforth, 2018. Phylogeny, new generic-level classification, and historical biogeography of the Eucera complex (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 119: 81-92. 26. Amiet F, A Müller and CJ Praz, 2017. Apidae 1 – Allgemeiner Teil, Gattungen, Apis, Bombus / Partie générale, genres, Apis, Bombus. Fauna Helvetica 29, info fauna CSCF & SEG, Neuchâtel, 187 pp. 25. Packer L, JR Litman and CJ Praz, 2017. Phylogenetic position of a remarkable new fideliine bee from northern Chile (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae). Systematic Entomology 42: 473-488. 24. Praz, CJ, 2017. Subgeneric classification and biology of the leafcutter and dauber bees (genus Megachile Latreille) of the western Palearctic (Hymenoptera, Apoidea, Megachilidae). Journal of Hymenoptera Research 55: 1-54. 23. Soltani, GS, D Bénon, N Alvarez and CJ Praz, 2017. When different contact zones tell different stories: putative ring species in the Megachile concinna species complex (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 121: 815-832. 22. Lucchetti MA, G Glauser , V Kilchenmann, A Dubecke, G Beckh, CJ Praz and C Kast, 2016. -
The Bees of Sub-Saharan Africa
A-PDF Split DEMO : Purchase from www.A-PDF.com to remove the watermark Genus Nasutapis Michener (Fig. 36E) Nasutapis has a distinct projection medioventrally on the clypeus. This genus is monotypic (Nasutapis straussorum Michener) and endemic to KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa, and found in nests of Braunsapis facialis (Gerstaecker). 8.6.2. Subfamily Nomadinae In sub-Saharan Africa the Nomadinae comprises four tribes and six genera. They are all cleptoparasitic. Diagnostic features for the subfamily are difficult to define, but almost each tribe has a distinctive feature, except Ammobatoidini. 8.6.2.1. Tribe Nomadini Genus Nomada Scopoli (Fig. 37A) Nomadini has one genus in sub-Saharan Africa, namely Nomada. There are ten species, occurring mostly in North-East and southern Africa. 8.6.2.2. Tribe Epeolini Genus Epeolus Latreille (Fig. 37B) Epeolini has one genus in sub-Saharan Africa, namely Epeolus. There are 13 species that occur mostly on the east side of the continent, along its entire length. 8.6.2.3. Tribe Ammobatoidini Genus Ammobatoides Radoszkowski (Fig. 37C) Ammobatoidini has one genus in sub-Saharan Africa, and it is known only from the holotype of Ammobatoides braunsi Bischoff. It was collected in Willowmore, South Africa. It therefore goes without saying that it is extremely rare. 8.6.2.4. Tribe Ammobatini The Ammobatini has four sub-Saharan genera. They all comprise cleptoparasitic bees. Ammobates has its centre of diversity in the Palaearctic, as does Chiasmognathus, which occurs just north of the Afrotropical Region and intrudes into sub-Saharan Africa. Pasites is mostly Afrotropical and Sphecodopsis is endemic to southern Africa. -
The Impact of Molecular Data on Our Understanding of Bee Phylogeny and Evolution
EN58CH04-Danforth ARI 5 December 2012 7:55 The Impact of Molecular Data on Our Understanding of Bee Phylogeny and Evolution Bryan N. Danforth,1∗ Sophie Cardinal,2 Christophe Praz,3 Eduardo A.B. Almeida,4 and Denis Michez5 1Department of Entomology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853; email: [email protected] 2Canadian National Collection of Insects, Agriculture Canada, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0C6, Canada; email: [email protected] 3Institute of Biology, University of Neuchatel, Emile-Argand 11, 2009 Neuchatel, Switzerland; email: [email protected] 4Departamento de Biologia, FFCLRP-Universidade de Sao˜ Paulo, 14040-901 Ribeirao˜ Preto, Sao˜ Paulo, Brazil; email: [email protected] 5University of Mons, Laboratory of Zoology, 7000 Mons, Belgium; email: [email protected] Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2013. 58:57–78 Keywords First published online as a Review in Advance on Hymenoptera, Apoidea, bees, molecular systematics, sociality, parasitism, August 28, 2012 plant-insect interactions The Annual Review of Entomology is online at ento.annualreviews.org Abstract by 77.56.160.109 on 01/14/13. For personal use only. This article’s doi: Our understanding of bee phylogeny has improved over the past fifteen years 10.1146/annurev-ento-120811-153633 as a result of new data, primarily nucleotide sequence data, and new methods, Copyright c 2013 by Annual Reviews. primarily model-based methods of phylogeny reconstruction. Phylogenetic All rights reserved Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2013.58:57-78. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org studies based on single or, more commonly, multilocus data sets have helped ∗ Corresponding author resolve the placement of bees within the superfamily Apoidea; the relation- ships among the seven families of bees; and the relationships among bee subfamilies, tribes, genera, and species. -
A Supermatrix Approach to Apoid Phylogeny and Biogeography Shannon M Hedtke1*, Sébastien Patiny2 and Bryan N Danforth1
Hedtke et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2013, 13:138 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/13/138 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access The bee tree of life: a supermatrix approach to apoid phylogeny and biogeography Shannon M Hedtke1*, Sébastien Patiny2 and Bryan N Danforth1 Abstract Background: Bees are the primary pollinators of angiosperms throughout the world. There are more than 16,000 described species, with broad variation in life history traits such as nesting habitat, diet, and social behavior. Despite their importance as pollinators, the evolution of bee biodiversity is understudied: relationships among the seven families of bees remain controversial, and no empirical global-level reconstruction of historical biogeography has been attempted. Morphological studies have generally suggested that the phylogeny of bees is rooted near the family Colletidae, whereas many molecular studies have suggested a root node near (or within) Melittidae. Previous molecular studies have focused on a relatively small sample of taxa (~150 species) and genes (seven at most). Public databases contain an enormous amount of DNA sequence data that has not been comprehensively analysed in the context of bee evolution. Results: We downloaded, aligned, concatenated, and analysed all available protein-coding nuclear gene DNA sequence data in GenBank as of October, 2011. Our matrix consists of 20 genes, with over 17,000 aligned nucleotide sites, for over 1,300 bee and apoid wasp species, representing over two-thirds of bee genera. Whereas the matrix is large in terms of number of genes and taxa, there is a significant amount of missing data: only ~15% of the matrix is populated with data. -
Genetic Diversity, Nutritional and Biological Activity of Momordica
Genetic diversity, nutritional and biological activity of Momordica cochinchinensis (Cucurbitaceae) A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Applied Biology and Biotechnology) Dilani Chathurika Wimalasiri BSc (Hons) (Institute of Chemistry, Sri Lanka) BSc (Spectrum Institute of Science and Technology, Sri Lanka) School of Applied Sciences College of Science Engineering and Health RMIT University August, 2015 Declaration I certify that except where due acknowledgement has been made, the work is that of the author alone; the work has not been submitted previously, in whole or in part, to qualify for any other academic award; the content of the thesis is the result of work which has been carried out since the official commencement date of the approved research program; any editorial work, paid or unpaid, carried out by a third party is acknowledged; and, ethics procedures and guidelines have been followed. Dilani Chathurika Wimalasiri 31 August 2015 ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to express my greatest gratitude to my supervisor, Dr Tien Huynh, for her mentoring, guidance and constant encouragement throughout the years. I’m also thankful to her for collecting the plant samples for me to work on. I would like to thank my co supervisors Associate Professor Terrence Piva and Dr Sylvia Urban for their patience, guidance and helpful discussions throughout this project. I’m thankful for Professor Ann Lawrie for her comments on the project and my thesis chapters. I am grateful for the help from Dr Robert Brkljača and his assistance in the nutritional analysis section of my project. I am also thankful for Mr Paul Morrison’s (School of Applied Sciences - Applied Chemistry, RMIT Unniversity) guidance in UPLC analysis. -
Insect Egg Size and Shape Evolve with Ecology but Not Developmental Rate Samuel H
ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1302-4 Insect egg size and shape evolve with ecology but not developmental rate Samuel H. Church1,4*, Seth Donoughe1,3,4, Bruno A. S. de Medeiros1 & Cassandra G. Extavour1,2* Over the course of evolution, organism size has diversified markedly. Changes in size are thought to have occurred because of developmental, morphological and/or ecological pressures. To perform phylogenetic tests of the potential effects of these pressures, here we generated a dataset of more than ten thousand descriptions of insect eggs, and combined these with genetic and life-history datasets. We show that, across eight orders of magnitude of variation in egg volume, the relationship between size and shape itself evolves, such that previously predicted global patterns of scaling do not adequately explain the diversity in egg shapes. We show that egg size is not correlated with developmental rate and that, for many insects, egg size is not correlated with adult body size. Instead, we find that the evolution of parasitoidism and aquatic oviposition help to explain the diversification in the size and shape of insect eggs. Our study suggests that where eggs are laid, rather than universal allometric constants, underlies the evolution of insect egg size and shape. Size is a fundamental factor in many biological processes. The size of an 526 families and every currently described extant hexapod order24 organism may affect interactions both with other organisms and with (Fig. 1a and Supplementary Fig. 1). We combined this dataset with the environment1,2, it scales with features of morphology and physi- backbone hexapod phylogenies25,26 that we enriched to include taxa ology3, and larger animals often have higher fitness4. -
Journal of Melittology Bee Biology, Ecology, Evolution, & Systematics the Latest Buzz in Bee Biology No
Journal of Melittology Bee Biology, Ecology, Evolution, & Systematics The latest buzz in bee biology No. 26, pp. 1–4 17 December 2013 BRIEF COMMUNICATION Notes on male and female facial patterns in bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea), with comments on other aculeates Charles D. Michener1 Abstract. Pallid (frequently yellow) integumental areas characterize faces of many bees and related wasps. Some species lack such markings, others lack them only in females, while oth- ers have them in both sexes. A rule applicable to thousands of species is that, if present, yellow areas are more extensive in males than in females. In different groups, yellow areas can be either expanded or reduced, both have occurred repeatedly in the Aculeata. In some groups that lack integumental yellow facial areas, males have brushes of yellow or brassy facial hairs that hide the integument. Behavior associated with presence or abscence of facial yellow areas is not rec- ognized, for mating males usually approach females from above and behind so that neither can see the face of the other. Possibly male-to-male interactions are involved. INTRODUCTION In many aculeate Hymenoptera, especially those with yellow, white, or reddish integumental markings on the body, the face also has such markings. For simplicity, they are termed yellow below. Such areas contrast with the commonly black back- ground color of the head, although in some species the background color is ferrugi- nous or yellow. In such cases the yellow areas may become unrecognizable. The basic rule is that, if individuals of a species exhibit yellow facial marks, they will be more extensive in males than in females. -
Wasps and Bees in Southern Africa
SANBI Biodiversity Series 24 Wasps and bees in southern Africa by Sarah K. Gess and Friedrich W. Gess Department of Entomology, Albany Museum and Rhodes University, Grahamstown Pretoria 2014 SANBI Biodiversity Series The South African National Biodiversity Institute (SANBI) was established on 1 Sep- tember 2004 through the signing into force of the National Environmental Manage- ment: Biodiversity Act (NEMBA) No. 10 of 2004 by President Thabo Mbeki. The Act expands the mandate of the former National Botanical Institute to include respon- sibilities relating to the full diversity of South Africa’s fauna and flora, and builds on the internationally respected programmes in conservation, research, education and visitor services developed by the National Botanical Institute and its predecessors over the past century. The vision of SANBI: Biodiversity richness for all South Africans. SANBI’s mission is to champion the exploration, conservation, sustainable use, appreciation and enjoyment of South Africa’s exceptionally rich biodiversity for all people. SANBI Biodiversity Series publishes occasional reports on projects, technologies, workshops, symposia and other activities initiated by, or executed in partnership with SANBI. Technical editing: Alicia Grobler Design & layout: Sandra Turck Cover design: Sandra Turck How to cite this publication: GESS, S.K. & GESS, F.W. 2014. Wasps and bees in southern Africa. SANBI Biodi- versity Series 24. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria. ISBN: 978-1-919976-73-0 Manuscript submitted 2011 Copyright © 2014 by South African National Biodiversity Institute (SANBI) All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form without written per- mission of the copyright owners. The views and opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect those of SANBI. -
Phylogeny of the Bee Family Megachilidae (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) Based on Adult Morphology
Systematic Entomology (2012), 37, 261–286 Phylogeny of the bee family Megachilidae (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) based on adult morphology VICTOR H. GONZALEZ1, TERRY GRISWOLD1,CHRISTOPHEJ. PRAZ2,3 and BRYAN N. DANFORTH2 1USDA-ARS, Bee Biology and Systematics Laboratory, Utah State University, Logan, UT, U.S.A., 2Department of Entomology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, U.S.A. and 3Laboratory of Evolutionary Entomology, University of Neuchatel, Neuchatel, Switzerland Abstract. Phylogenetic relationships within the bee family Megachilidae are poorly understood. The monophyly of the subfamily Fideliinae is questionable, the relation- ships among the tribes and subtribes in the subfamily Megachilinae are unknown, and some extant genera cannot be placed with certainty at the tribal level. Using a cladistic analysis of adult external morphological characters, we explore the rela- tionships of the eight tribes and two subtribes currently recognised in Megachilidae. Our dataset included 80% of the extant generic-level diversity, representatives of all fossil taxa, and was analysed using parsimony. We employed 200 characters and selected 7 outgroups and 72 ingroup species of 60 genera, plus 7 species of 4 extinct genera from Baltic amber. Our analysis shows that Fideliinae and the tribes Anthidiini and Osmiini of Megachilinae are paraphyletic; it supports the monophyly of Megachilinae, including the extinct taxa, and the sister group relationship of Lithurgini to the remaining megachilines. The Sub-Saharan genus Aspidosmia,a rare group with a mixture of osmiine and anthidiine features, is herein removed from Anthidiini and placed in its own tribe, Aspidosmiini, new tribe. Protolithurgini is the sister of Lithurgini, both placed herein in the subfamily Lithurginae; the other extinct taxa, Glyptapina and Ctenoplectrellina, are more basally related among Megachilinae than Osmiini, near Aspidosmia, and are herein treated at the tribal level. -
Bee Conservation in Sub-Saharan Africa and Madagascar: Diversity, Status and Threats Connal D
Bee conservation in Sub-Saharan Africa and Madagascar: diversity, status and threats Connal D. Eardley, Mary Gikungu, Michael P. Schwarz To cite this version: Connal D. Eardley, Mary Gikungu, Michael P. Schwarz. Bee conservation in Sub-Saharan Africa and Madagascar: diversity, status and threats. Apidologie, Springer Verlag, 2009, 40 (3), 10.1051/apido/2009016. hal-00892023 HAL Id: hal-00892023 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00892023 Submitted on 1 Jan 2009 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Apidologie 40 (2009) 355–366 Available online at: c INRA/DIB-AGIB/EDP Sciences, 2009 www.apidologie.org DOI: 10.1051/apido/2009016 Review article Bee conservation in Sub-Saharan Africa and Madagascar: diversity, status and threats* Connal D. Eardley1,MaryGikungu2, Michael P. Schwarz3 1 Agricultural Research Council, Private Bag X134, Queenswood, 0121, Pretoria, South Africa 2 Zoology Department, National Museums of Kenya, PO Box 40658-00100, Nairobi, Kenya 3 School of Biological Sciences, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, South Australia 5001, Australia Received 14 October 2008 – Revised 2 February 2009 – Accepted 4 February 2009 Abstract – Sub-Saharan Africa and Madagascar contain a wealth of bee diversity, with particularly high levels of endemicity in Madagascar. -
Zootaxa, Taxonomic Revision of the African Bee
ZOOTAXA 2099 Taxonomic revision of the African bee subgenera Patellapis, Chaetalictus and Lomatalictus (Hymenoptera: Halictidae, genus Patellapis Friese 1909) KIM TIMMERMANN & MICHAEL KUHLMANN Magnolia Press KIM TIMMERMANN & MICHAEL KUHLMANN Taxonomic revision of the African bee subgenera Patellapis, Chaetalictus and Lomatalictus (Hymenoptera: Halictidae, genus Patellapis Friese 1909) (Zootaxa 2099) 188 pp.; 30 cm. 11 May 2009 ISBN 978-1-86977-357-1 (paperback) ISBN 978-1-86977-358-8 (Online edition) FIRST PUBLISHED IN 2009 BY Magnolia Press P.O. Box 41-383 Auckland 1346 New Zealand e-mail: [email protected] http://www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ © 2009 Magnolia Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored, transmitted or disseminated, in any form, or by any means, without prior written permission from the publisher, to whom all requests to reproduce copyright material should be directed in writing. This authorization does not extend to any other kind of copying, by any means, in any form, and for any purpose other than private research use. ISSN 1175-5326 (Print edition) ISSN 1175-5334 (Online edition) 2 · Zootaxa 2099 © 2009 Magnolia Press TIMMERMANN & KUHLMANN Zootaxa 2099: 1–188 (2009) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2009 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) Taxonomic revision of the African bee subgenera Patellapis, Chaetalictus and Lomatalictus (Hymenoptera: Halictidae, genus Patellapis Friese 1909) KIM TIMMERMANN1 & MICHAEL KUHLMANN2 1 University of Münster, Institute of Landscape Ecology, Robert Koch-Straße 26, D-48149 Münster, Germany; [email protected] 2 The Natural History Museum, Department of Entomology, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK; [email protected] Table of contents Abstract .............................................................................................................................................................................. -
Floral Relatioships of Bees in Selected Areas of Sri Lanka
Cey. J. Sci. (Bio. Sci.) Vol. 34,2005,27-45 FLORAL RELATIOSHIPS OF BEES IN SELECTED AREAS OF SRI LANKA W. A. Inoka P. Karunaratne, Jayanthi P. Edirisinghe* and C. V. Savithri Gunatilleke1 Department of Zoology, 'Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, SriLanka. ABSTRACT This study represents the very first attempt to record the floral relations of bees of Sri Lanka. Floral hosts of 117 bee species in 35 genera were recorded based on floral visits, pollen carriage and special behaviour at flowers. Floral hosts comprised 154 plant species in 112 genera and 44 families. Majority of the floral hosts were native plants of which most were weeds in their respective habitats. The exotic naturalized weed, Hyptis suaveolense was exceptional in attracting 60 bee species. All five species of social bees and majority of the solitary bees were polylectics foraging on pollen of a variety of unrelated flowers. Seven solitary bee species were recognized as oligolectics foraging on species of Convolvulaceae and Malvaceae having large spiny pollen. Sonication at tubular anthers of certain Solanaceae and Melastomataceae flowers having concealed pollen was observed in 12 species of solitary bees. Nectar robbing by males of five species of solitary bees was recorded from certain tubular-shaped flowers. Floral relationships suggest that most bees are generalists and a few have become specialized to forage on specific groups of flowers. The information gathered would be useful in pollination studies and in the management and conservation of bees. INTRODUCTION The pollen relationships of solitary bees Studies on bees of Sri Lanka (Dalla Torre, unlike those of social bees vary from being general 1896; Bingham, 1897; Strand, 1913; Wijesekara, (visiting a wide variety of unrelated flower types 2001; Karunaratne, 2004; Karunaratne et.