DOCSLIB.ORG

Toward a Mechanistic Psychology of Dialogue

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Toward a Mechanistic Psychology of Dialogue Edinburgh Research Explorer Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue Citation for published version: Pickering, MJ & Garrod, S 2004, 'Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue', Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol. 27, no. 02, pp. 169-225. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X04000056 Digital Object Identifier (DOI): 10.1017/S0140525X04000056 Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Published In: Behavioral and Brain Sciences Publisher Rights Statement: ©Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2004). Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27(02), 169-225doi: 10.1017/S0140525X04000056 General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 28. Sep. 2021 BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES (2004) 27, 169–226 Printed in the United States of America Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue Martin J. Pickering Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9JZ, United Kingdom [email protected] http://www.psy.ed.ac.uk/Staff/academics.html#PickeringMartin Simon Garrod Department of Psychology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QT, United Kingdom [email protected] http://staff.psy.gla.ac.uk/~simon/ Abstract: Traditional mechanistic accounts of language processing derive almost entirely from the study of monologue. Yet, the most natural and basic form of language use is dialogue. As a result, these accounts may only offer limited theories of the mechanisms that un- derlie language processing in general. We propose a mechanistic account of dialogue, the interactive alignment account, and use it to de- rive a number of predictions about basic language processes. The account assumes that, in dialogue, the linguistic representations em- ployed by the interlocutors become aligned at many levels, as a result of a largely automatic process. This process greatly simplifies production and comprehension in dialogue. After considering the evidence for the interactive alignment model, we concentrate on three aspects of processing that follow from it. It makes use of a simple interactive inference mechanism, enables the development of local di- alogue routines that greatly simplify language processing, and explains the origins of self-monitoring in production. We consider the need for a grammatical framework that is designed to deal with language in dialogue rather than monologue, and discuss a range of implica- tions of the account. Keywords: common ground; dialogue; dialogue routines; language comprehension; language production; monitoring; perception-be- havior link 1. Introduction gree of experimental control necessary. Studies of language comprehension are fairly straightforward in the experi- Psycholinguistics aims to describe the psychological pro- mental psychology tradition – words or sentences are stim- cesses underlying language use. The most natural and ba- uli that can be appropriately controlled in terms of their sic form of language use is dialogue: Every language user, characteristics (e.g., frequency) and presentation condi- including young children and illiterate adults, can hold a tions (e.g., randomized order). Until quite recently it was conversation, whereas reading, writing, preparing speeches also assumed that imposing that level of control in many and even listening to speeches are far from universal skills. language production studies was impossible. Thus, Bock Therefore, a central goal of psycholinguistics should be to (1996) points to the problem of “exuberant responsing” – provide an account of the basic processing mechanisms that how can the experimenter stop subjects from saying what- are employed during natural dialogue. ever they want? However, it is now regarded as perfectly Currently, there is no such account. Existing mechanis- possible to control presentation so that people produce the tic accounts are concerned with the comprehension and appropriate responses on a high proportion of trials, even production of isolated words or sentences, or with the pro- in sentence production (e.g., Bock 1986a; Levelt & Maas- cessing of texts in situations where no interaction is possi- sen 1981). ble, such as in reading. In other words, they rely almost en- Contrary to many people’s intuitions, the same experi- tirely on monologue. Hence, theories of basic mechanisms mental control is possible with dialogue. For example, depend on the study of a derivative form of language pro- Branigan et al. (2000) showed effects of the priming of syn- cessing. We argue that such theories are limited and inad- tactic structure during language production in dialogue that equate accounts of the general mechanisms that underlie were exactly comparable to the priming shown in isolated processing. In contrast, this paper outlines a mechanistic sentence production (Bock 1986b) or sentence recall (Pot- theory of language processing that is based on dialogue, but ter & Lombardi 1998). In Branigan et al.’s study, the degree that applies to monologue as a special case. of control of independent and dependent variables was no Why has traditional psycholinguistics ignored dialogue? different from that in Bock’s study, even though the exper- There are probably two main reasons, one practical and one iment involved two participants engaged in a dialogue theoretical. The practical reason is that it is generally as- rather than one participant producing sentences in isola- sumed to be too hard or impossible to study, given the de- tion. Similar control is exercised in studies by Clark and col- © 2004 Cambridge University Press 0140-525X/04 $12.50 169 Pickering and Garrod: Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue leagues (e.g., Brennan & Clark 1996; Wilkes-Gibbs & Clark is Clark. However, his primary focus is on the nature of the 1992; also Brennan & Schober 2001; Horton & Keysar strategies employed by the interlocutors rather than basic 1996). Well-controlled studies of language production in di- processing mechanisms. Clark (1996) contrasts the “lan- alogue may require some ingenuity, but such experimental guage-as-product” and “language-as-action” traditions. The ingenuity has always been a strength of psychology. language-as-product tradition is derived from the integra- The theoretical reason why psycholinguistics has ignored tion of information-processing psychology with generative dialogue is that psycholinguistics has derived most of its grammar and focuses on mechanistic accounts of how peo- predictions from generative linguistics, and generative lin- ple compute different levels of representation. This tradi- guistics has developed theories of isolated, decontextual- tion has typically employed experimental paradigms and ized sentences that are used in texts or speeches, that is, in decontextualized language; in our terms, monologue. In monologue. In contrast, dialogue is inherently interactive contrast, the language-as-action tradition emphasizes that and contextualized: Each interlocutor both speaks and utterances are interpreted with respect to a particular con- comprehends during the course of the interaction; each in- text and takes into account the goals and intentions of the terrupts both others and himself; on occasion two or more participants. This tradition has typically considered pro- speakers collaborate in producing the same sentence cessing in dialogue using apparently natural tasks (e.g., (Coates 1990). So it is not surprising that generative lin- Clark 1992; Fussell & Krauss 1992). Whereas psycholin- guists commonly view dialogue as being of marginal gram- guistic accounts in the language-as-product tradition are maticality, contaminated by theoretically uninteresting admirably well-specified, they are almost entirely decon- complexities. Dialogue sits ill with the competence/perfor- textualized and, quite possibly, ecologically invalid. On the mance distinction assumed by most generative linguistics other hand, accounts in the language-as-action tradition (Chomsky 1965), because it is hard to determine whether a rarely make contact with the basic processes of production particular utterance is “well-formed” or not (or even or comprehension, but rather present analyses of psy- whether that notion is relevant to dialogue). Thus, linguis- cholinguistic processes purely in terms of their goals (e.g., tics has tended to concentrate on developing generative the formulation and use of common ground; Clark 1985; grammars and related theories for isolated sentences; and 1996; Clark & Marshall 1981). psycholinguistics has tended to develop processing theories This dichotomy is a reasonable historical characteriza- that draw upon the rules and representations assumed by tion. Almost all mechanistic theories happen to be theories generative linguistics. So far as most psycholinguists have of the processing of monologue; and theories of dialogue thought about dialogue, they have
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Cognitive Revolution: a Historical Perspective
    Review TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences Vol.7 No.3 March 2003 141 The cognitive revolution: a historical perspective George A. Miller Department of Psychology, Princeton University, 1-S-5 Green Hall, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA Cognitive science is a child of the 1950s, the product of the time I went to graduate school at Harvard in the early a time when psychology, anthropology and linguistics 1940s the transformation was complete. I was educated to were redefining themselves and computer science and study behavior and I learned to translate my ideas into the neuroscience as disciplines were coming into existence. new jargon of behaviorism. As I was most interested in Psychology could not participate in the cognitive speech and hearing, the translation sometimes became revolution until it had freed itself from behaviorism, tricky. But one’s reputation as a scientist could depend on thus restoring cognition to scientific respectability. By how well the trick was played. then, it was becoming clear in several disciplines that In 1951, I published Language and Communication [1], the solution to some of their problems depended cru- a book that grew out of four years of teaching a course at cially on solving problems traditionally allocated to Harvard entitled ‘The Psychology of Language’. In the other disciplines. Collaboration was called for: this is a preface, I wrote: ‘The bias is behavioristic – not fanatically personal account of how it came about. behavioristic, but certainly tainted by a preference. There does not seem to be a more scientific kind of bias, or, if there is, it turns out to be behaviorism after all.’ As I read that Anybody can make history.
    [Show full text]
  • UC Merced Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society
    UC Merced Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society Title When eye see you: Gaze and joint attention in human interaction Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/02h9m3wx Journal Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 35(35) ISSN 1069-7977 Authors Staudte, Maria Pfeiffer, Ulrich Publication Date 2013 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California When eye see you: Gaze and joint attention in human interaction Maria Staudte ([email protected]) Ulrich Pfeiffer ([email protected]) Department of Computational Linguistics Department of Psychiatry Saarland University University Hospital Cologne Keywords: joint attention; gaze; social interaction; language cognition and communication are among the core symptoms processing; dialog; grounding. of autism spectrum disorders (ASD). Due to the broad impact of joint attention on social and communicative skills, its study Topic and Goals has become a major focus in the empirical research on ASD. Gaze behavior provides fundamental mechanisms for sharing The majority of this research is dedicated to understanding mental states such as goals and desires and helps to ground the implications of mutual and triadic gaze for the develop- communicative content. In order to establish common ground ment of skills related to communication among typically de- in verbal and non-verbal interactions, interlocutors often need veloping individuals and those with ASD (Mundy, Gwaltney, to acquire knowledge about their interaction partners’ focus & Henderson, 2010; Redcay et al., 2012). of visual attention by following their gaze and, in turn, have Overall, this workshop aims to explore how traditionally to direct their partners attention to their own target object or separate research areas such as social cognition/neuroscience, location.
    [Show full text]
  • Culture, Language and Emotion
    Volume 4 General Psychological Issues in Cultural Perspective Issue 2 Language, Communication and Culture Article 3 7-2020 Culture, Language and Emotion Alexandra S. Dylman Stockholm University, [email protected] Marie-France Champoux-Larsson Mid Sweden University Ingrid Zakrisson Mid Sweden University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/orpc Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Alex Dylman, Department of Special Education, Stockholm University, Frescati Hagväg 10, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden. Email: [email protected] Recommended Citation Dylman, A. S., Champoux-Larsson, M., & Zakrisson, I. (2020). Culture, Language and Emotion. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1167 This Online Readings in Psychology and Culture Article is brought to you for free and open access (provided uses are educational in nature)by IACCP and ScholarWorks@GVSU. Copyright © 2020 International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology. All Rights Reserved. ISBN 978-0-9845627-0-1 Culture, Language and Emotion Abstract Culture, language and emotion all influence and affect our daily lives in their own manner. Although there is a large body of research suggesting that these factors interact with each other in intricate ways, they have traditionally been studied independently of each other. Furthermore, although biculturalism and bilingualism are not new phenomena, they are now prevalent globally to the extent that research investigating culture or language cannot be complete without taking them into account. Thus, in this paper, we discuss how culture, language and emotion may mutually influence one another in a globalized world where biculturalism and bilingualism are commonplace and suggest how future research could investigate these individual factors jointly.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding, Scripting and Staging Emotional Experiences. Peter Stockinger
    Understanding, scripting and staging emotional experiences. Peter Stockinger To cite this version: Peter Stockinger. Understanding, scripting and staging emotional experiences. : On some central research topics on emotion and language.. 2018. hal-01802931 HAL Id: hal-01802931 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01802931 Preprint submitted on 29 May 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - NoDerivatives| 4.0 International License Preprint Understanding, scripting and staging emotional experiences. On some central research topics on emotion and language. Peter Stockinger Institut National des Langues et Civilisations Orientales (INALCO) (ORCID) Lambach – Paris 2018 2 Abstract Research on the relationship between emotion and (natural) language generally considers them from two complementary perspectives: 1. the emotional (or expressive) use of language (either in the narrow – linguistic - sense of a system of verbal signs or in a more holistic – semiotic sense – of verbal and non-verbal signs) to manifest, to stage (in the sense of sociologist E. Goffman, 1974) an emotional state, a passion, an affect; 2. the semantic universe of signs of a language (either in the linguistic sense of la langue1 or in the semiotic sense of le langage) that conceptualize and clarify the cultural vision, the meaning shared by a community of speakers about emotions, passions and affects.
    [Show full text]
  • Psycholinguistic Framework for a Humanistic Model of Foreign Language Acquisition
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 119 529 FL 007-561 AUTHOR McCoy, Ingeborg R. TITLE Psycholinguistic Framework for a Humanistic Model of Foreign Language Acquisition. PUB DATE Nov 75 NOTE 19p.; Paper presented at the Convention of the American Council on the Teaching of ForeignLanguages (Washington, D.C., November 24-26, 1975) EDRS PRICE MF-$0.83 HC-$1.67 Plus Postage DESCRIPTORS Communication (Thought Transfer); Curriculum Development; *Humanistic Education; *Language Instruction; Language Skills; LearningProcesses; *Models; Psychoeducational Processes; *Psycholinguistics; *Second Language Learning; Student Attitudes; Student Motivation; Teaching Methods ABSTRACT Human development tasks have becomean integral part of many humanistic curriculum models. Whensuch activities are employed in the foreign language classroom,several prominent factors can be indentified: on a psychological (affective) level,integrative and transactional motivation; on a linguistic (cognitive/affective) level, active listening comprehension and creativelanguage use. No concrete psycholinguistic evidence has been establishedfor the effectiveness of the enumerated factors; butsupport can be found in current psycholinguistic theory and research in theirapplication to second language learning. A psycholinguistic frameworkaccentuates the need to include human development tasks intoobjective research as well as to make them part of successful foreign languageprograms. (Author) ***********************************i*********************************** Documents acquired by ERIC include many informal unpublished * materials not available from othersources. ERIC makes every effort * * to obtain the best copy available. Nevertheless, itemsof marginal * * reproducibility are often encountered and this affectsthe quality * * of the microfiche and hardcopy reproductions ERIC makesavailable * * via the ERIC Document Reproduction Service (EDRS).EDRS is not * responsible for the quality of the original document.Reproductions * * supplied by EDRS ace the best thatcan be made from the original.
    [Show full text]
  • On Chomsky's Review of Skinner's Verbal Behavior
    On Chomsky's Review of Skinner’s VERBAL BEHAVIOR Kenneth MacCorquodale University of Minnesota S kinner's book, Verbal Behavior, was published in 1957. Chomsky's review of it appeared in 1959. By the criterion of seminal influence in generating controversy and stimulating publication, both must be counted major successes, although the reputation and influence of the review are more widely acknowledged. It has been reprinted at least three times (The Bobbs-Merrill Reprint Series in the Social Sciences, No. A-34; Fodor and Katz, 1964; Jakobovits and Miron, 1967), and Chomsky has recently written (in Jakobovits and Miron, 1967, p. 142) that he would take back little of it if he were rewriting it now. Skinner's Verbal Behavior is an analysis of speech in terms of its “controlling relations” which include the speaker’s current motivational state, his current stimulus circumstances, his past reinforcements, and his genetic constitution. Skinner has accepted the constraints of natural science in his basic analytical apparatus in that all of its terms are empirically definable. He intends to account only for the objective dimensions of verbal behavior and to invoke only objective, nonmentalistic and nonhypothetical entities to account for it. The notion of control, anathema to the politically oversensitive, means only “causation” in its purely functional sense, and need not alarm. It is not arguable nor criticizable that behavior is an orderly, controlled datum, sensitive to the circumstances of the behaver; this is simply a fact which has been amply confirmed. Contents: . Introduction . Criticism 1: Verbal Behavior is an untested hypothesis which has, therefore, no claim upon our credibility .
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Cognitive, Linguistic, and Psychological Science Integrating the Study of Mind, Brain, Behavior, and Language
    Department of Cognitive, Linguistic, and Psychological Science Integrating the Study of Mind, Brain, Behavior, and Language Brown University’s Department of Cognitive, Linguistic, and Psychological Sciences (CLPS) is dedicated to the multidisciplinary study of mind, brain, behavior, and language. It offers three Ph.D. programs: in Cognitive Science, Linguistics, and Psychology. Entering students are accepted by the department and formally choose one of the three Ph.D. programs after completing the first year: Psychology, Cognitive Science, Linguistics. Accepted students receive five years of full financial support. Application Deadline: December 1. Electronic application portal: https://www.applyweb.com/browng/ Required: GRE General scores; TOEFL scores for non-native speakers of English. We do not require completion of specific coursework; rather, we accept students from a diverse range of training programs and with very different research backgrounds. For general application requirements, please see the Brown Graduate School web pages (http://www.brown.edu/academics/gradschool/application-information). A critical element in judging applications is our assessment of the fit between the applicant’s intellectual and research interests and those of one or more faculty members. We strongly recommend that, before applying, you carefully read the departmental website (https://www.brown.edu/academics/cognitive- linguistic-psychological-sciences/ and give particular attention to the research descriptions supplied by each faculty member. Many applicants have found it useful to correspond with individual faculty members before applying, but this is not required. Please note that we cannot estimate the probability of being admitted before you have applied. Our admission decisions are based on the complete application, which is considered by multiple members of the faculty.
    [Show full text]
  • Psycholinguistics – How We Process Language
    Psycholinguistics – How We Process Language I. Language Processing A. psycholinguistics = the study of language processing mechanisms. Psycholinguistics like to study how word meaning, sentence meaning, and discourse meaning are computed and represented in the mind. A. the burning question: “How is language done?” A. Mostly an unconscious process. Example: We think when we’re reading words on a page that it’s a smooth process, but our eyes actually jerk across the page – a process called saccadic motion. (The individual jerks by our eyes are called saccades.) II. Methods of Psycholinguistic Research A. Naturally Occurring 1. Spoonerisms = “slips of the tongue”. Ex: The dear old queen = The queer old dean. (segment switching) Ex: The rules of word formation = The words of rule formation. (word switching) Ex: I’d forgotten about that = I’d forgot aboutten that. (morpheme switching) What it shows: The entire phrase must be planned in advance, or else we couldn’t switch segments, morphemes, and words like this. This reveals something about the manner in which sentence (and phrase) production is planned in the mind. 2. tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon: trying to access a word based on meaning, spelling, initial letter, rhyme, etc. Ex: “Oh, it’s that color that’s really bright green….and it’s also a really strong liquor…but it sounds a bit like “loose”….it starts with a “sh” sounds….chartreuse! That’s it!” What it shows: how words are organized in the mind = mental lexicon. Access of the mental lexicon must be very quick, since word recognition takes just 1/3 of a second.
    [Show full text]
  • Psycholinguistics Fall, 2020-2021
    Faculty of Science Course Syllabus Department of Psychology and Neuroscience PSYO/NESC 3190 Psycholinguistics Fall, 2020-2021 Instructor: Myrto Brandeker, Ph.D., SLP-Reg, SLP(C) [email protected] OffIce hours: through Collaborate Ultra (schedule wIll be released separately) Lectures: Asynchronous delIvery through Brightspace portal Modules will be released weekly accordIng to below schedule Teaching Assistants: Alex Ryken, M.Sc. (Marker) [email protected] _____________________________________________________________________________________ Course Description Explores the cognitive and neural bases of human language processing. Topics Include: human language and other communication systems; phonology; morphology; semantIcs; syntax; dIscourse; fIrst and second language acquisition; relationship of language to general cognitive functions such as music and mathematIcs; sIgned languages such as AmerIcan SIgn Language; and non-linguistic gesture. Course Prerequisites PSYO 2000.03 or NESC 2007.03, and NESC/PSYO 2130.03. Major and honours students In the thIrd year of the Linguistics program do not require these prerequisites, however, a prerequisite override from the instructor is required for registration. Course Objectives/Learning Outcomes Broadly speaking, thIs course aims to Improve your skills In Independent, critIcal thInking and clear communication, as well as to give you a deeper understanding of how language—one of the most unique and complex features of human cognition—works. Language Is a central part of our lIves and hopefully this class wIll provide you wIth Insight that enriches you. An understanding of language can Inform personal decisions and polIcies In areas as diverse as educatIon, polItIcs, and health. ThIs course recognizes that lIfe is not a multiple choice test, and simply “knowing a bunch of stuff” won’t get you too far — you need to critically evaluate Information to make decisions and take action In the world around you.
    [Show full text]
  • Behaviorist Theory and Language Learning
    Hacettepe Vniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi Yıl 1988 i Sayı 3 i ss. 135 - 140 BEHAVIORIST THEORY AND LANGUAGE LEARNING Doç. Dr. Mehuıet DEMİREZEN* INTRODUCTION There are some basic theories advanced to deseribe how language is acquired and taught. The behaviorist theory, Mentalist theory, Rationalist theory (otherwise calIed Congitive theory), Empiricist theory (Audiolingualism), and Cognitive-code theory are some of these theories. Of these, behaviorist theory and mentalist theory are mainly applicable to the acquisition of native languages while the rest can account for foreign language acquisition. Yet, the se five fundamental theories of language leaming cannot be totalIy divorced from each other, for "the objectives of second language learning are not necessarily entirely de- termined by natiye language competence inevitably serves as a foil aga- inst which to set second language leaming." (H.H. Stem, .1983; 30). Mother Tongue and Foreign Language Learnmg These five basic theories are, furthermore, very much complemen- tary to each other, serving different types of learners or representing various cases of language leaming. They must not automaticalIy make us presume that firstand second language leamings are iden tical or alike processes, though second language leaming is strongly tied up with first language acquisition. Obviously, native language growth must pave the way for foreign language growth. Then these five basiclanguage leaming theories are fundamental pillars of language leaming whose relevance to education is undeniable. The Background of the Behaviorist Theory Behaviorist theory, which is basicalIy a psychological theory in its essence, founded by J.B. Watson, is actualIy a theory of native lan- guage learning, advanced in part as a reaction to traditional grammar.
    [Show full text]
  • Psycholinguistics
    To appear in In K. Malmkjaer (Ed.) The Linguistics Encyclopedia. Second Edition. London, Routledge. Psycholinguistics John N. Williams University of Cambridge, UK Psycholinguistics is a discipline in which the insights of linguistics and psychology are brought to bear on the study of the cognitive aspects of language understanding and production. One of the earliest psychological accounts of language was Wundt's Die Sprache (1900), which is essentially a psychological interpretation of the linguistic work of the Junggrammatiker (see HISTORICAL LINGUISTICS, p.194). However, the strongly empiricist and anti-mentalist attitude to science which dominated both linguistics and psychology during the first half of the twentieth century (see BEHAVIOURIST LINGUISTICS) inhibited theorizing about mental processes involved in linguistic behaviour, and it was not until the late 1950s and early 1960s that the work of Noam Chomsky (see RATIONALIST LINGUISTICS and TRANSFORMATIONAL-GENERATIVE GRAMMAR) provided a climate of thought in which the discipline could flourish. The main impetus for psycholinguistic research in the 1960s was the wish to explore the psychological reality of grammars produced by linguists, that is, to try to show that these in some way mirrored what went on in speakers' and hearers' minds. The two most famous contro- versies within this framework were produced by the derivational theory of complexity (DTC), according to which a sentence would be more difficult to process the further removed its surface structure was from its deep structure, and the theory of the autonomy of syntactic processing, according to which the syntactic analysis of sentences constitutes an independent stage in their perception. There is now general agreement that DTC is false (Garnham, 1985, pp.71-74) and the grammars which produced it have, in any case, been superseded (see TRANSFORMATIONAL-GENERATIVE GRAMMAR).
    [Show full text]
  • Psycholinguistics?
    PsPsyycchhoolliningguistiuisticscs Hauptseminar,Hauptseminar, SSSS 2014,2014, CampusCampus EssenEssen RaymoRaymonndd HickeHickeyy,, EnglisEnglishh LinguisLinguistticsics Why should one go to a seminar on psycholinguistics? 1)Language acquisition tells about the manner in which we unconsciously learn language in our childhood. As second language acquisition it tells us about the way in which we can add another language to our existing knowledge of language. Second language acquisition furthermore offers insights into how two languages interact and illuminates the phenomenon of interference. 2)First language acquisition reveals the stages through which we as very young children go through in learning our later native language.These stages teach us about what areas of language are central and what are less important. 3)First language acquisition offers evidence for the hypothesis ofmany scientists that a certain amount of knowledge is innate (the nativist standpoint) and not simply learned by observation and/or habit (the empiricist standpoint). 4) The order of stages is of relevance when looking at other areas of linguistics such as language change because the division of phenomena and categories into central and peripheral (acquisitional hierarchy) is reflected in the types of language change which are attested in the world's languages. 5) The progression of language acquisition furthermore throws light on our cognitive development and as such help us to better understand our psychological makeup. 6) On a broader level, language acquisition is concerned with learning more than one language. While monolingualism is often the rule in modern Western societies, most of the world's population is at least bilingual. This bilingualism has a social and an individual aspect.
    [Show full text]