DOCSLIB.ORG

Download Issue (PDF)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Download Issue (PDF) Inside: Michael Lighty on Socialist Vision and DSA's Mission PUBLISHED BY THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALISTS Of AMERICA OCRATIC Winning the Peace • • Prospects for the Israeli left • • The Arab world after the accords • INSIDE DEMOCRATIC LEFT Is An Israeli Left Being Born? Meet DSA's New National Director... 10 by Eric Lee. .. 3 Socialist Vision and DSA's Mission The Arab World After the Handshake: by Michael Lighty. 11 An lnteNiew with Mitchell Cohen by Joanne Barkan. .6 On the Left by Harry Fleischman. 14 DSAction .. .9 Jimmy Higgins Reports. 16 cover photo courtesy of Americans for Peace Now near, it looks as though we might tal's power can onJy come from a EDITORIAL succeed in defeating the agreement. renewed and internationalized left. Many congressional representatives, The left-wing anh-N AFT A move­ reacting mostly to widespread fear of ment, including progressi\·e unions NAFTAAND job losses in the U.S., have decided and environmental and community recently to oppose NAFTA. Presi­ organizations, has taken ~mall but dent Clinton has acknowledged that significant steps toward the left's of­ OUR FUTURE he does not have the votes to pass it. ten-preached but rarely-practiced Yet what appears to be a victory may dream -- global solidarity. We must BY GINNY COUGHLIN not be. continue to work ilcross borders with For the past year I've been trav­ A victory in Congress would be labor unions, environmentalists,. tu­ elling around the country talking to only a first step in the fight against dents, Latino-led groups, and com­ students about the campaign to de­ NAFTA. Over the long haul, we'll be munity orgarnzations to build a feat the North American Free Trade successful only insofar as we pro­ grassroots movement to demand a Agreement, and why this campaign mote a truly progressive vision. We democratic, equitable, and interna­ is so important for the future of the must demand a democratic, anti-rac­ tional future. ~ U.S., Canada, and Mexico. ist, feminist alternative economic Aided by new production and and social integration of North Gi1111y Co11gl1/i11 is tl1e OS:\ Youth Or- communications technologies, cor­ America. As .things stand now, if ga111zer. porations are locating factories all NAFTA is defeated in Congress, it over the world and forcing workers won't be this progressive vision that • to choose low wages, long hours, and makes the headlines. The media will horrendous working conditions -- or probably interpret a NAFTA defeat DEMOCRATIC LEFT no job at all. NAFTA makes it easier as a victory for old-fashioned protec­ Ma11ngi11g Editor for North American companies to tionism -- or, worse, as a victory for Michael Lighty move production facilities to areas the racist demands of Pat Buchanan with the cheapest labor and most lax and the far right of the Republican l'rod11dio11 environmental protection, forcing Party. If that happens, our victory in David Glenn down wages and working conditions Congress will be a defeat for our E1fiturial Committu everywhere. movement. Joanne Barkan, Dorothee Benz, I've encouraged DSA Youth Sec­ But it need only be a temporary Howard Croft, Mitch Horowitz. tion chapters to make the campaign defeat. The struggle against interna­ Sherri Levine, Maxine Phillips against NAFTA a first step towards tional corporate control will not end Fo1111di11g Editor building an international movement with the vote on NAFT A. Transna­ Michael Harrington (1928-1989) to counter transnational corporate tional capital will steadily gain . control over our lives with demands power, with or without NAFfA, and D•mo<rohc loft (15..'N DI t.100207),. pub'.atwd bimonthly •t 15 Dul<hSt. t 500. NY, N' 1000~ Soa:inddo.. po•,.gef"'id for popular democratic control. we will gradually lose our ability to •t New York. NY (PuMiutoon 1'o. 071ll-9602i !>utacriphom: For most of the past year I didn't make locally-based or nationally­ S!I ro•gut.r; SIS bi~rnutlllllal Postmuttt :'oond add~ <hang•.io 15 Outch<:4.,t5fo0,NY, l\'Ylo lleJrocroticl..tft think we could win the N AFT A based demands on corporations or i. puhh•hed by the Otmo<r•oc 5.x\alist• of Arnone>, IS Dutch f.t • t 500, NY, NY J 003K m2) 962-0390. S.gntJ muln battle. But as the scheduled vote in governments r>rrruthtcponomtSofllot""tl'°"'tmd"°'........,,1ytltokojtlw the House of Representatives draws Serious resistance to global ca pi- °'X""~flOtJ 2 DrM<XRA11C Lrrr Is .An Israeli Left Being Born? A Survey of the Landscape After the Accords BY ERIC LEE nan article published in these pages a few tiation ahead. There might even be a little war months ago, I argued that "neither side" with Syria ahead of us. But the fact remains that in the Middle East conflict "is in any the Middle East is finally resolving a conflict I hurry to reach a peace agreement." It which has lasted for three generations. turned out that both sides were actually in quite This should be cause for celebration in the a hurry. Israeli left and peace movement, and it is. To emphasize the snail's pace at which the Within days of the good news of an Israeli-PLO peace process then appeared to be moving, I peace accord, Peace Now organized a very large came up with what seemed to be, at the time, a demonstration in Tel Aviv's biggest square. funny scenario. I suggested that the next excuse The right answered with a series of violent for delay might be local elections in Norway. clashes with the police in Jerusalem. What could be further removed from the Since then, most of the left has been busy Middle East than Norway? congratulating Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin It would tum out that Oslo was where the and Foreign Minister Shimon Peres on their breakthrough finally came. courage and initiative. I saw this right here at My predictive powers having been amply home the other day when Rabin paid a visit to demonstrated, I have now been asked to write our kibbutz factory. A spokesman for the kib­ about recent developments in the peace process butz hailed Rabin as a "man of peace," and the and especially the Israeli left's reaction. Consid­ prime minister was greeted with a standing ering my track record as a prophet, I hope ovation. readers will forgive me if I limit the discussion At any other time in 1993 such a reception at to what is actually happening, and not what will a left-wing kibbutz would not have been imag­ happen next. inable. When Rabin deported four hundred All the obstacles I pointed to on the Israeli Hamas activists to Lebanon, he was widely and Palestinian sides were really there; but they criticized by the Israeli left. When he closed off were all overcome. There is now genuine reason the flow of Palestinian workers in an attempt to for optimism. There will besomed ifficult nego- stop the wave of knife-wielding terror, he was Nov£MElER/D£CFMElE:R 1993 3 coalition. The point is that withoutMeretz, without its public and private pressure, Rabin and Peres would probably never have taken the step of talking with Arafat. The Labor Party doves who fought for the PLO recognition and the compro­ mise on Gaza and Jericho fought as allies of Meretz. Alone, they were not able to get the Labor Party to move beyond the talk of "territo­ rial compromise" and a "Jordanian option." Behind the scenes and in public as well, Meretz promoted the change in Israeli policy. This is exactly what Environment Minister Yosi Sarid declared when Meretz launched its 1992 elec­ tion campaign: Meretz would lead the way for the Rabin government. Every leader of the Israeli right now says this is what happened. Rabin has abandoned his traditional position and adopted Meretz's line. Does this mean that the need for an inde­ pendent left has diminished or disappeared? Yes and no. Now that Labor has embraced what was once Mapam's (and later Meretz's) unique position of talking with Palestinians who recog­ nize Israel and repudiate terror, it's arguable that there is no longer a need to build a left party Tens of also attacked by the peace camp. Finally, when in order to pressure Labor to make conce:.sions. thousands he launched "Operation Accountability" -- the What was once Mapam's heresy is now Labor's came to a recent air and artillery war against Lebanon -­ policy. rally called by even government ministers from the Meretz On the other hand, it is not only the issue of Peace Nowln bloc (comprised of the socialist Mapam party peace that has separated Meretz (and Mapam in Tel Aviv In and its two liberal partners) were outspoken in particular) from Labor. A whole range of issues early -- economic, social, and cultural -- divide Israeli September. their condemnation of Rabin's brutality and inhumanity. Until early September, it was actu- society, and on these the Labor Party and the ally not a very good year between Rabin and the Left do not always agree. Israeli left. Israel's political formations will need to In the wake of the accord with the PLO, the learn again how to talk about these i:.:.ues Since Israeli left has taken an attitude of forgive and the 1967 Six Day War, Israeli politic:. has been sterile. Author Amos Oz has often pointed out Do the accords mean that the that the constant discussion about borders has diverted attention from the real issues. No one need for an independent Israeli has talked for a generation or more about the kind of society we want to have here in the left has disappeared? Yes and no.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 'The Left's Views on Israel: from the Establishment of the Jewish State To
    ‘The Left’s Views on Israel: From the establishment of the Jewish state to the intifada’ Thesis submitted by June Edmunds for PhD examination at the London School of Economics and Political Science 1 UMI Number: U615796 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U615796 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 F 7377 POLITI 58^S8i ABSTRACT The British left has confronted a dilemma in forming its attitude towards Israel in the postwar period. The establishment of the Jewish state seemed to force people on the left to choose between competing nationalisms - Israeli, Arab and later, Palestinian. Over time, a number of key developments sharpened the dilemma. My central focus is the evolution of thinking about Israel and the Middle East in the British Labour Party. I examine four critical periods: the creation of Israel in 1948; the Suez war in 1956; the Arab-Israeli war of 1967 and the 1980s, covering mainly the Israeli invasion of Lebanon but also the intifada. In each case, entrenched attitudes were called into question and longer-term shifts were triggered in the aftermath.
    [Show full text]
  • The Labor Party and the Peace Camp
    The Labor Party and the Peace Camp By Uzi Baram In contemporary Israeli public discourse, the preoccupation with ideology has died down markedly, to the point that even releasing a political platform as part of elections campaigns has become superfluous. Politicians from across the political spectrum are focused on distinguishing themselves from other contenders by labeling themselves and their rivals as right, left and center, while floating around in the air are slogans such as “political left,” social left,” “soft right,” “new right,” and “mainstream right.” Yet what do “left” and “right” mean in Israel, and to what extent do these slogans as well as the political division in today’s Israel correlate with the political traditions of the various parties? Is the Labor Party the obvious and natural heir of The Workers Party of the Land of Israel (Mapai)? Did the historical Mapai under the stewardship of Ben Gurion view itself as a left-wing party? Did Menachem Begin’s Herut Party see itself as a right-wing party? The Zionist Left and the Soviet Union As far-fetched as it may seem in the eyes of today’s onlooker, during the first years after the establishment of the state, the position vis-à-vis the Soviet Union was the litmus test of the left camp, which was then called “the workers’ camp.” This camp viewed the centrist liberal “General Zionists” party, which was identified with European liberal and middle-class beliefs in private property and capitalism, as its chief ideological rival (and with which the heads of major cities such as Tel Aviv and Ramat Gan were affiliated)­.
    [Show full text]
  • Inequality, Identity, and the Long-Run Evolution of Political Cleavages in Israel 1949-2019
    WID.world WORKING PAPER N° 2020/17 Inequality, Identity, and the Long-Run Evolution of Political Cleavages in Israel 1949-2019 Yonatan Berman August 2020 Inequality, Identity, and the Long-Run Evolution of Political Cleavages in Israel 1949{2019 Yonatan Berman∗ y August 20, 2020 Abstract This paper draws on pre- and post-election surveys to address the long run evolution of vot- ing patterns in Israel from 1949 to 2019. The heterogeneous ethnic, cultural, educational, and religious backgrounds of Israelis created a range of political cleavages that evolved throughout its history and continue to shape its political climate and its society today. De- spite Israel's exceptional characteristics, we find similar patterns to those found for France, the UK and the US. Notably, we find that in the 1960s{1970s, the vote for left-wing parties was associated with lower social class voters. It has gradually become associated with high social class voters during the late 1970s and later. We also find a weak inter-relationship between inequality and political outcomes, suggesting that despite the social class cleavage, identity-based or \tribal" voting is still dominant in Israeli politics. Keywords: Political cleavages, Political economy, Income inequality, Israel ∗London Mathematical Laboratory, The Graduate Center and Stone Center on Socio-Economic Inequality, City University of New York, [email protected] yI wish to thank Itai Artzi, Dror Feitelson, Amory Gethin, Clara Mart´ınez-Toledano, and Thomas Piketty for helpful discussions and comments, and to Leah Ashuah and Raz Blanero from Tel Aviv-Yafo Municipality for historical data on parliamentary elections in Tel Aviv.
    [Show full text]
  • The Regional Context Domestic Aspects of Strategic Postures: the Past and Future in a Middle East Nuclear Regime
    The Regional Context Domestic Aspects of Strategic Postures: The Past and Future in a Middle East Nuclear Regime ETEL SOLINGEN This paper examines domestic aspects of the debate over the establishment of a regional nuclear regime in the Middle East. It does so in order to offset the marginal attention paid to the impact of domestic processes and institutions in the definition of strategic outcomes.' The call for incorporating domestic politics into the study of international regimes is not new but, with few exceptions, has been rarely followed by actual applications.2 That failure has not been the subject of great controversy in the analysis of nuclear options in the Middle East, because neorealist assumptions about the primacy of state survival considerations have gained unparalleled analytical supremacy. The potential for physical annihilation compelled a neorealist point of departure, even when neorealist assumptions led to no particular saddlepoint, or solution (in logical terms, the search for survival could have led to a range of means and outcomes). That different domestic actors are likely to define strategic options with different considerations in mind seems self-evident. Domestic groups weigh different international outcomes according to the latter's potential effect on their own political and institutional pay-offs. The pay-offs associated with different outcomes can be affected by different mixes of side-payments. For instance, no military establishment entrusted with maintaining conventional deterrence would endanger its access to conventional weapons, the means with which it maintains its mission. In general terms, domestic actors rank their preferences according to the rate at which they discount the future, their degree of receptivity to transparency, their sensitivity coefficients to gaps in gains, and/or their definition of a 'balanced exchange'.
    [Show full text]
  • Israeli Press: a Comparative Analysis of "Assafir" and "The Jerusalem Post"
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 2001 Framing and Counterframing of the Middle East Peace Process in the Arab -Israeli Press: a Comparative Analysis of "Assafir" and "The Jerusalem Post". Houda Hanna El-koussa Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation El-koussa, Houda Hanna, "Framing and Counterframing of the Middle East Peace Process in the Arab -Israeli Press: a Comparative Analysis of "Assafir" and "The eJ rusalem Post"." (2001). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 401. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/401 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion.
    [Show full text]
  • Meretz: Cheering Obama; Comparison with Hadash
    Meretz: Cheering Obama; comparison with Hadash This JTA article (dated Nov. 7), “As Obama takes second term, Israelis wonder what the future holds,” mentions in it first few paragraphs, Young Meretz activists partying happily at an Obama reelection celebration: Harold Shapiro wears ‘My heart on left’ tee, flanked by T. Bikel & L. Rivlin. Most Israelis were asleep as the polls closed in America and voters waited for the results, but on one rooftop in central Tel Aviv a party with loud classic rock music and flashing lights was going strong. It was the pro-Obama election-watching party of Israel’s left-wing Meretz party. Deviating from a solidly anti-Obama consensus in Israel — a poll showed Israeli Jews preferring Republican challenger Mitt Romney over the president, 59 percent to 22 percent — Meretz’s young members drank, talked and danced around a projection screen alternating between CNN and Israeli news coverage. For members of Israel’s embattled left, the party was a chance to celebrate liberalism. Attendees wore bright green shirts reading “My heart is leftist” or sporting Obama paraphernalia from 2008. A cheer rose as an Israeli TV station presented a photo slideshow of the president’s life. “We identify with the progressive values Obama represents,” said Tomer Reznik, 23, chairman of the Young Meretz group. “On one hand he supports Israel, and pushes Israel with the other hand.” The green T-shirts mentioned, which our visiting delegation on the recent Israel Symposium also wore at times (as pictured here), bore the Hebrew slogan more accurately translated as “My heart is on the left” with a lower line reading “Meretz: the left of Israel.” Among the people we met was a Member of Knesset who represents a left political party that is not Meretz.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Parties
    Political Parties: Political Parties and Interest Groups in Israel Gregory Mahler Earlham College Richmond, Indiana December 9-11, 2007 Parliamentary Government • “Westminister” vs. Presidential Government – 1. Split executive – 2. President symbolic; Prime Minister and Cabinet powerful – 3. Prime Minister and Cabinet from the Knesset – 4. Government responsible to the Knesset • The Knesset and the Prime Minister • The President Political Ideology • l. Private enterprise (a) vs. socialism (b); • 2. "Activist" Arab policy (c) vs. restraint (d); • 3. Torah oriented life (e) vs. secularism (f); • 4. Pro-Soviet Union (g) vs. pro-West (h); • 5. Zionist (i) vs. non-Zionist (j).* A---------------------------------------------------------------------B C---------------------------------------------------------------------D E---------------------------------------------------------------------F G---------------------------------------------------------------------H I----------------------------------------------------------------------J * Thomas Goodland, "A Mathematical Presentation of Israel's Political Parties," British Journal of Sociology 8 (1957): 263-66. Political Parties Functions of Political Parties – Personnel Agencies – Organize Groups and Articulate Demands – Frame of Reference – Linkage Mechanisms The Electoral System • Proportional Representation (Israel) vs. Single-Member-District Representation (U.S.) • Electoral Lists of Political Parties • Accuracy of Representation • The 1992 “Deviation” The Complexity of the Coalition-Formation Process • Situation I: Simplest Majority Possibilities – Parties: A (44), B (42), C (14) AB, AC, BC, ABC • Situation II: More Complex Majority Possibilities – Parties: A (38), B (20), C (17), D (15), E (10) AB, AC, AD, ABC, ABD, ABE, ADE, BCD, etc. • Situation III: Most Complex Majority Possibilities – Parties: A (30), B (19), C (12), D (9), E (8), F (8), G (7), H (7) ABC, ABD, ABE, ABF, ABG, BCDE, CDEFGH, etc. Approx. Life of Date of Govt. Knesset Prime Minister (Party) Coalition Partners Govt.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Election Results in Israel, 1949-2019
    Chapter 19. "Inequality, Identity, and the Long-Run Evolution of Political Cleavages in Israel 1949-2019" Yonatan Berman Appendix: Figures, tables and raw results Main figures and tables Figure 1 Legislative election results in Israel, 1949-2019 Figure 2 Class cleavages in Israel, 1969-2019 Figure 3 Vote for right and left in Tel Aviv, Israel, 1949-2019 Figure 4 Residual identity component in Tel Aviv, Israel, 1981-2015 Figure 5 Vote for right-wing and left-wing parties among unemployed and inactive voters in Israel, 2003-2015 Figure 6 The educational cleavage in Israel, 1969-2019 Figure 7 Vote for right-wing parties among Sepharadic voters in Israel, 1969-2019 Figure 8 The religious cleavage in Israel, 1969-2019 Figure 9 The gender cleavage in Israel, 1969-2019 Appendix figures and tables Figure A1 General election results in Israel by bloc, 1949-2019 Figure A2 Income inequality in Israel, 1979-2015 Figure A3 Vote for left by social class (excluding center and Arab parties), 1969-2019 Figure A4 Vote for the Republican and Democratic candidates in New York City, 1948-2016 Figure A5 The effect of the 2003 reforms on left and right vote Figure A6 Share of voters by ethnicity and religiosity, 1969-2019 Table A1 Division of parties to blocks Table A2 The effect of the 2003 reforms on right vote Figure 18.1 - Legislative election results in Israel, 1949-2019 100% Right (Likud, Israel Beitenu, etc.) Left (Labor, Meretz, etc.) 90% Center (Kahol Lavan, etc.) Arab parties (Joint Arab List, etc.) 80% Ultra-orthodox (Shas, Yahadut HaTora, etc.) 70% 60% 50% 40% Share of votes (%) votes of Share 30% 20% 10% 0% 1949 1954 1959 1964 1969 1974 1979 1984 1989 1994 1999 2004 2009 2014 2019 Source: author's computations using official election results (see wpid.world).
    [Show full text]
  • The Way Forward
    The Way Forward Israel and India as the two leading parliamentary democracies have traveled a long and difficult electoral terrain in the past 70 years toward political independence. Sharing commonalities on various socio- economic, religious and political issues, Israel and India also exhibit distinct differences on these issues. The successful holding of parliamen- tary elections from independence to date—twentieth in Israel and six- teenth in India—strengthens the spirit of their democratic survival. The political governance in the two nations in the twenty-first century assumes significance in view of transformation from politico–emotive issues to economico–pragmatic issues, especially in the aftermath of globalization of the 1980s. Their polities witness a unique feature of a shift from ‘one- party dominance’ to ‘multiparty coalition’, which came to be character- ized by the term, ‘Coalitional Multipolarity’. The focus of the book has been more on the changing dynamics of the parties and party systems of Israel and India. As both the countries share common historical and colonial experiences, the party formations in the two nations before and after independence get unprecedented signifi- cance. Researchers on parties and party systems might not have witnessed extensive commonalities in the systems of two parliamentary democratic © The Author(s) 2018 343 S.K. Choudhary, The Changing Face of Parties and Party Systems, DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-5175-3 344 The Way Forward nations in terms of their electoral behavior, democratic pattern of gover- nance, party dominance and uniform shifts in party systems. From this perspective, comparing democracies, parties and governance of Israel and India leave good scope for the new researchers to delve into the actual dynamics of the two systems.
    [Show full text]
  • ISRAEL Date of Elections: October 28, 1969 Characteristics Of
    ISRAEL Date of Elections: October 28, 1969 Characteristics of Parliament The Parliament of Israel, the Knesset, is unicameral and consists of 120 Deputies elected for 4 years. The elections of October 28 were held upon the normal expiry of the previous legislature. Electoral System Every citizen, of either sex, may vote provided he has reached the age of 18 by the determining day — the last day of December of the year preceding the register year, which commences on the 139th day after the determining day. The law makes no other stipulation as to eligibility to vote. Normally, electors must vote in the constituency in which they are reg­ istered. However, for the elections of 1969, the Electoral Law was amended to authorize sailors and passengers aboard Israeli ships to take part in the voting. In addition, special provisions were made to enable soldiers stationed on the frontiers to vote. Every Israeli citizen of either sex and who has reached the age of 21 on the day of the admission of a candidates' list may stand for the Knesset. The following shall not be candidates: the President of the State, the 2 Chief Rabbis, the State Comptroller, judges and members of religious courts, rabbis and ministers of other religions while holding office for a remuneration, and, finally, State officials holding a rank greater than grade 5, and officers while serving or during a period of 100 days after they cease to serve. A list of candidates may be presented by each Party represented in the outgoing Knesset or by 750 members of the electorate.
    [Show full text]
  • 1'R.Nr Z Rti~·A~RV~E~Y-,·.J
    -,...-....,.-_.-- -- - _. _. -' _. - , '. , . • . -', , . New Coalition Gov't>·,,, · • .i. ·•·.. , .... '1· S'" p'O' S' T' '. , . , . 'l'hursdaY.::()ctD»e,r,1,2,i951i., " T PngreSSive-GZ, StlenFomiog' Page Fourtee~~n~ ______....:. ...... ___~:,....---------~"""--·~·~!~:"":"~:"!.l· ~,,,,!!:,"~' ~,!'I"!:.:"'~'~:,:. :..:..'_....:.--'-':-:-~--....,;;.,..~.. :, i".~. ~..... ":,:-:-.~,., ....... ~;o;: ... :::;": . ..;.~'~~.'.'"' .... f,"",.;,:.: .. :;.··.. '-"'·~~·~.,..t.',~'· MiBi~terRostln, Prior to the rejection. of .. the' caretaker regime, the fo11~wing : ' '. ),," . ' . .,'. • . Mapai and Sephardim, besides his own progressiv~ report, was ,received: " , . which he calls "a race With til\'te."rangidrom bUilding anMequlpment VicU;r R~';iher,: brother of the', SEARCH I'OWEIiS', -c. , sM··" . '.' .,.. Chaim· party. :Th'elr representation'in the Knesset totals 63. Spe8\dng of his government's program, the premier emphasized that """,,,",' ..,...,.",..,..", ,.._ ..... """... """ _,,,,,,,,,,,,,, .". """,ow, _w- .' (.;..c ....... 'j .•.• ·,·.. 'of the Aftet' re'Porting Wednesday:!,,' the President his "we deny that either full capi~1ism or fun ~iaJjsm" is possible in Israel. ~ ~ i1!iT':::>-~·~ He insisted that 60th .courses have always been present in the country. ate Israeli investments, by govern- I';"a ',,;claInation, city 'ana' rural mobile workers union, and'hil\'tself ferredo';' him by the Cabinet to . drenCH the African 'and.'.'Mlddie failure to .get Knesset approval for a ca;ret,aker govern­ ment, 'Ben Gurian went to Haila to review army al1d He warned that. "there' will never be a government in this country which ment spendirig and by f6reign public housing . a;"d other'. vital. develop- ~ducati~nal:' direCt"r'. of" }J.A.W.~ ;iuthorizepolice an,d .trooPS Jo .ca~.E8st ghettos· at· so small a .c~t, ,After navy ytla-qoeuvers. The Kriess.e,t· voted "no co¢idence" will dare move from this line." , .
    [Show full text]
  • ISRAEL Date of Elections
    ISRAEL Date of Elections: December 31, 1973 Purpose of Elections Elections were held for all the members of Parliament upon the normal expiry of their term of office. Characteristics of Parliament The unicameral Parliament of Israel, the Knesset, consists of 120 Deputies elected for 4 years. Electoral System Every Israeli national, of either sex, at least 18 years of age may vote. Although no persons are expressly disqualified from voting, certain may not practically do so because they are not provided with polling facilities; this includes prisoners or persons abroad who are not seamen. The electoral register is drawn up at the national level by the Ministry of Interior and is prepared anew each year. Voting is not compulsory. Every eligible voter at least 21 years of age may be a candidate to the Knesset. The following people, however, are barred from being candidates: the President of the State; the State Comptroller; salaried rabbis; judges; and senior civil servants and army officers of a certain rank, unless they cease to hold their posts 100 days before election day. Where a more junior civil servant or army officer becomes a candidate his service is suspended until election day and, if he becomes a member of the Knesset, so long as he is a parliamentarian. A list of candidates may be presented either by 750 members of the electorate or by a party group represented in the outgoing Knesset. In the former case the representative of the list must deposit I£ 15,000, which deposit is returned if the list obtains 1 % of the total valid votes cast in the country.
    [Show full text]