Joshua the High Priest and the Interpretation of Zechariah 3
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Joshua the High Priest and the Interpretation of Zechariah 3 JAMES C. VANDERKAM University of Notre Dame Notre Dame, IN 46556 TkE PROPHECIES OF ZECHARIAH are one of the most important sources for reconstructing the status of the high priest at the time of the return to Zion. Joshua, the first to hold the office after the exile, is mentioned in Ezra as a leader of the first group that returned to Jerusalem (2:2 = Neh 7:7; 1 Esdr 5:5, 8). Ezra 3:2 further identifies him as a son of Jozadak, who was in turn the son of the last reigning high priest of the first temple (2 Kgs 25:18; 1 Chr 6:15; Jer 52:24). Joshua himself is never given the title high priest in Ezra—a fact which is in harmony with the tendency of the book to avoid titles.1 Among the activities of Joshua, the book notes that he participated in constructing the altar, that he offered sacrifices on it, joined in starting construction of the second temple, and played a role at least at the beginning of the successful drive to complete the structure (3:1-13; 5:1-2; 1 Esdr 5:47-58; 6:1-2). Strangely, he does not figure in the celebratory passage about the dedication of the temple (6:15-22; 1 Esdr 7:4-15). His only other appearance in Ezra is in 10:18 (1 Esdr 9:19), where it is reported that some of his descendants married foreign women whom they agreed to expel under heavy pressure from Ezra. If one had access to Ezra and 1 Esdras alone, one would learn little about the status and normal day-to-day responsibilities of the high priest, and still less about what people expected from this official. The prophecies 1 S. Japhet, "Sheshbazzar and Zerubbabel Against the Background of the Historical and Religious Tendencies of Ezra-Nehemiah," ZAW 94 (1982) 73-76, 82-89. 553 554 THE CATHOLIC BIBLICAL QUARTERLY I 53, 1991 of Haggai do little to rectify the situation. Joshua is named five times in the little prophetic work; in each case he is identified as the high priest and as the son of Jehozadak (1:1,12,14; 2:2,4). His name always follows that of Zerub- babel, and he is not included with the Davidic heir in the oracle that con cludes the book (2:20-23). Here one learns nothing about his activities beyond what Ezra records. It is only from the visions and oracles of Zechariah that one gains a fuller impression about what at least one person thought the duties of Joshua should be. He is named in chaps. 3 and 6 (3:1,3,6,8,9; 6:11), and chap. 4 represents him as one of the two "sons of oil." Zechariah, like Haggai, uses the title "high priest" for him (3:1,8) and also mentions his father Jehozadak (6:11). The much-disputed oracle in 6:9-15 speaks of crowns for Joshua and for someone termed Branch; it offers the picture found consistently in the book: Joshua and a Davidic ruler are dual heads of the new community. But chap. 3 alone focuses on Joshua, as it deals with his investiture, his roles in the new temple, and the effect for the nation. The chapter divides neatly into two parts. Vv 1-5 describe a visionary scene in the heavenly courtroom, a scene that is clearly marked off from the preceding section by the introductory verb *aim. V 6 then introduces an oracle from the Lord which is delivered by his angel; it extends from ν 7 to the end of the chapter. Zech 4:1 begins a new unit, as one can infer from the fact that the angel who arouses Zechariah from his sleep is called "the angel who talked with me," a designation that is absent from chap. 3. The person who was responsible for the present shape of Zechariah 1-8 has made a successful attempt to call attention to the vision of chap. 3 both by the place where he has situated it and by the special features that he has given to it. With chap. 4, it occupies the middle place in the sequence of eight visions in 1:7-6:15, all of which are presented as if they came to the prophet on the night of the 24th day of the 11th month in Darius' second year. Among the unique traits of chap. 3, are the following: (1) It lacks the interpreting angel who normally speaks with Zechariah, with the result that the seer is unable to question him about what he sees. (2) The prophet sees a historical char acter who is identified by name. (3) The satan is mentioned. (4) Someone shows Zechariah the vision (elsewhere, he sees it).2 In this paper I will address some of the exegetical issues encountered in Zechariah 3, especially the background against which the oracle in 3:8-10 2 See C. L. Meyers and Ε. M. Meyers, Haggai, Zechariah 1-8 (AB 25B; Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1987) 179, 213-15; C. Jeremías, Die Nachtgesichte des Sacharja (FRLANT 117; Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1977) 201-3. JOSHUA IN ZECHARIAH 3 555 should be read. Part I surveys the visionary section (w 1-5); part II deals with the oracular material in w 6-10 and the dominant ways of interpreting w 8-10; and part III advances a new proposal for understanding w 8-10. The whole is meant to be a contribution toward reconstructing the position of the high priest in the early postexilic period. I. The Vision (3:1-5) The visionary scene is a courtroom in which the principal characters in order of appearance are: Joshua, the angel of the Lord, the satan, the Lord, and possibly Zechariah (v 5). The reader is ushered into the drama in mid-act because the first words exchanged presuppose that an accusation has been made by the satan against Joshua. The Lord rebukes the accuser and char acterizes himself as the one who has chosen Jerusalem (cf. 1:14-17; 2:1-5, 10,16 [Engl. 1:18-21; 2:6,12]). At the end of ν 2 the Lord refers to someone or something as a "brand plucked from the fire."3 Although Jerusalem is the nearest possible referent to the pronoun m, the context proves that the graphic expression describes Joshua. Jerusalem, of course, is considered a feminine noun (see the suffixes in 2:6,8,9 [Engl. 2:2,4,5]). Moreover, the situation virtually requires that Joshua be the one intended. Twice it is said of him that he is clad in filthy garments (3:3,4). The word translated "filthy" (D*MX) is used here alone in the Bible, but its nominal cognates (rw'x, nx$) express the filth of human excrement (Deut 23:14 [Engl, ν 13]; 2 Kgs 18:27) and a drunkard's vomit (Isa 28:8).4 Thus, Joshua's clothing was not a little soiled; it was thoroughly filthy and beyond cleaning. It has been suggested that in this case the image is consistent with the designation of Joshua as a "brand plucked [literally: saved, rescued] from the fire"; his clothing became soiled as a result of being burned.5 It is reasonable to suppose that the reference is to Joshua's experience in exile, specifically in Babylon.6 Perhaps the wording itself suggests as much. The term translated as "brand" is τικ, which occurs rarely in Biblical Hebrew 3 All biblical citations are from the RSV 4 BDB, 844. 5 D. L. Petersen, Haggai and Zechariah 1-8 (OTL; Philadelphia: Westminster, 1984) 193. 6 B. Uffenheimer, The Visions of Zechariah: From Prophecy to Apocalyptic (Jerusalem: Kiryat Sepher, 1961 [Hebrew]) 97; Jeremías, Die Nachtgesichte des Sacharja, 207-9; Petersen, Haggai and Zechariah 1-8, 195; Meyers-Meyers, Haggai, Zechariah 1-8, 185-88. Cf. H. Mitchell, A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on Haggai, Zechariah, Malachi, and Jonah (ICC; Edin burgh: Clark, 1912) 150 (= Mitchell, Zechariah in future references); L. G. Rignell, Die Nacht- gesichte des Sacharja (Lund: Gleerup, 1950) 111. 556 THE CATHOLIC BIBLICAL QUARTERLY I 53, 1991 but resembles the name of the southern Babylonian city Ur from which Abram had come (Gen 11:28,31; 15:7; Neh 9:2). In later versions of the Abram stories, this city-name, interpreted as the Hebrew word for "fire, flame," served as a convenient springboard for the idea that Abram burned the idol temple in Ur, the event which caused him to leave the area because of the danger in which it put him (see Jub. 12:12-15). In some later stories Joshua himself is said to have been rescued from a Babylonian furnace (cf. Isa 31:9, where τικ and ΎΙΙΠ are parallel with one another).7 Perhaps Zechariah knew of such embellishments of the Abram stories and chose his words accordingly. In the verses that follow, Joshua's offensive clothing becomes the center of attention. The angel (apparently) orders those who stand in his presence to remove the filthy garments from him (v 4). Only then is one told the full meaning of the apparel: "And he said to him, 'Behold, I have taken your iniquity [ηην] away from you, and I will clothe you with rich apparel'" (v 4). The term rendered "rich apparel" (rroVn») is used only twice in Biblical Hebrew, here and in Isa 3:22, where it refers to the clothing worn by the wealthy ladies of Jerusalem.