Questioning German Expressionism: Nazi Reception and Contradiction in the Art of Käthe Kollwitz

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Questioning German Expressionism: Nazi Reception and Contradiction in the Art of Käthe Kollwitz Questioning German Expressionism: Nazi Reception and Contradiction in the Art of Käthe Kollwitz Madeline Ullrich Dr. Juliet Bellow Department of Art History General University Honors Spring 2014 My research is a study of Käthe Kollwitz's reception by the Nazi regime from 1933-1945 rather than one that focuses on her artistic production. Despite remaining a practicing artist up to her death in 1945, few art historians correlate her career with significant political events of the 1930s and 40s, such as the rise of the Third Reich. Relegated a “degenerate” artist by Hitler, Kollwitz’s art was initially included Degenerate Exhibition of 1937; however, her work was quickly removed from this derogatory spectacle. In fact, the Nazis even appropriated her work for their own propaganda. Hence, my project is defined by a single term: contradictions. The inconsistent treatment of “degenerate” artists reflects contradictions in a variety of realms: Nazi ideology, the artistic movement of German Expressionism as a whole, and gender. Exploring these contradictions not only reveals more about Kollwitz at the end of her career, but also speaks to her position as a German artist in contemporary art historical discourse. Ullrich 1 Berlin, 1941. Picture a small, poorly lit apartment, cluttered with items one would see in the studio of an artist: clay, drop cloths, modeling blocks, and the like. This is the home of the renowned German artist Käthe Kollwitz, which also became her studio in 1940. When Otto Nagel, a close friend and fellow artist of Kollwitz, came to visit her in this modest apartment the following year, he found the usually calm and reserved Kollwitz beside herself with rage. Kollwitz had just discovered her artwork had been plagiarized. Such a revelation would be horrifying for an author of any kind, but Kollwitz was upset not just because of the fact that her works were appropriated, but also about who had committed this deed: her intellectual property had been stolen by the Nazis.1 Images from Kollwitz’s print cycle Hunger, a series originally created to depict the horrific economic conditions faced by working-class German families in the aftermath of World War I, had been included in a Nazi-Fascist periodical. And not only had the print been reproduced without her knowledge or permission, but Warte (Viewpoint), a National Socialist women’s newspaper, changed their very meaning, claiming that these images showed victims of communism in Stalin’s Soviet Russia.2 To top it all off, Warte reproduced Kollwitz’s 1924 print Bread! (Fig. 1) under a fake signature, “St. Frank.”3 The scenario I just described occurred several times during the period of the Third Reich: the Nazis reproduced a number of Kollwitz’s prints without giving her credit, sometimes changing the artist’s signature altogether and reattributing their authorship. Kollwitz’s anger, conveyed in Nagel’s biography, was partially directed towards having her socially-concerned, left-leaning works appropriated for Fascist ends. But her anger must also have been fueled by the fact that only four years earlier, the Nazis labeled this very art “degenerate,” placing her works— 1 Otto Nagel, Käthe Kollwitz, trans. Stella Humphries (Greenwich, CT: New York Graphic Society Ltd., 1971), 81. 2 Ibid., 81. 3 Ibid. Ullrich 2 among the 650 pieces by 112 artists featured—in their notorious “Entartete Kunst” (“Degenerate Art”) exhibition in 1937. The intention of this now infamous exhibition was to show the German people the artwork—and, by association, the artists—that the Third Reich officially condemned, and thus deemed “un-German.” In his 1937 decree calling for museum leaders to relinquish modern artworks for “Entartete Kunst,” Reich Minister of Propaganda Joseph Goebbels requested any art that was seen to “insult German feeling, or destroy or confuse natural form, or simply reveal an absence of adequate manual and artistic skill.”4 Kollwitz’s works were among the many removed from museums for such reasons. Yet, to complicate the story even further, while “Entartete Kunst” had a successful run in Munich in 1937 and went on to travel throughout Germany and Austria from 1938-1941, it seems that Kollwitz’s works only appeared in the original Munich version of the exhibition. Her work was subsequently removed once the show traveled to Berlin and on to other venues.5[6] My essay thus hinges on a paradox: why would the Nazis appropriate the work of an artist they ultimately disavowed? Furthermore, why would they condemn Kollwitz as “degenerate” only to exonerate her from this status after the first iteration of “Entartete Kunst”? Scholars have never discussed at length such facts concerning Kollwitz and her treatment during the Third Reich. Thus, my paper takes a twofold approach to Käthe Kollwitz. The unraveling of the Nazis’ contradictory behavior towards Kollwitz during the Third Reich—was she “degenerate,” or was she not?—reveals the internal struggle within Nazi ideology on modern art. 4 Stephanie Barron, “1937: Modern Art and Politics in Prewar Germany,” in “Degenerate Art”: The Fate of the Avant-Garde in Nazi Germany, ed. Stephanie Barron (New York: Harry N. Abrams, Inc., Publishers and Los Angeles County Museum of Art, 1991), 19. 5 Ibid., 20. 6 Christoph Zuschlag, “An Educational Exhibition: Precursors of “Entartete Kunst” and Its Individual Venues,” in “Degenerate Art”: The Fate of the Avant-Garde in Nazi Germany, ed. Stephanie Barron (New York: Harry N. Abrams, Inc., Publishers and Los Angeles County Museum of Art, 1991), 92. Ullrich 3 In turn, my study of Kollwitz’s reception during the Third Reich will simultaneously create a more complete understanding of this artist and explore the problem of her categorization within the German art world of the early twentieth century. I will argue that it is the “universality” of her art—that is, its ability to straddle artistic movements both thematically and stylistically—that facilitated the appropriation of her work, complicating her reception by the Nazis in terms of their Degenerate Art Exhibition and, consequently, her place in subsequent art-historical scholarship. Categorizing Kollwitz: Her Legacy in Scholarship While scholars have paid scant attention to Kollwitz’s late career and the reception of her work during the Third Reich, there is certainly a developed literature devoted to the artist; methodologically, that field is relatively limited, primarily emphasizing biographical interpretation. Scholars often view Kollwitz as a tragic figure, equating her eventful life circumstances with her grim, sometimes disturbing representations of war, death, and economic despair. Otto Nagel, a close friend of Kollwitz, wrote a biography of the artist only 18 years after her death, connecting the events of her life to a broader historical context and discussing the key influences on Kollwitz’s style and subject matter. However, unlike other authors, Nagel devotes considerable time documenting Kollwitz’s production from 1933-1945, the official years of the Third Reich. He is the only author to go beyond a cursory reference to the interaction between the National Socialists and Käthe Kollwitz. His descriptions of her interactions with Nazism, revealed in her interrogations by the Gestapo, the Nazi appropriation of her artwork, and the removal of her artwork from museums across Berlin and Germany, serve as one catalyst for my paper. Ullrich 4 Yet, despite the wealth of information Nagel provides, scholars seem hesitant to analyze the artist from more theoretical perspectives, resulting in texts that are biographical in nature, the majority of which lack in-depth, scholarly analysis. With the rise of the feminist movement in the 1970s, art historians started making attempts in reviving female artists and their histories through biographical methods. Thus, the first biography on Kollwitz written by an American scholar is Martha Kearns’ Käthe Kollwitz: Woman and Artist (1976). As is common with feminist texts of this era, Kearns’s goal here is to bring Kollwitz, as a female artist, out of obscurity and to place her within a historical context. While this is certainly a noble ambition, Kearns’s biography on Kollwitz falls prey to the problem typical of feminist scholarship at that time. That is, while feminist scholars may have brought women artists into the scholarly discourse, they were often not engaging with the societal constructs that caused female artists to fall by the wayside in the first place.7 As a result, my paper will instead favor a social, historical approach to Kollwitz, questioning the institutions that shaped her career both leading up to and during the Third Reich specifically. Elizabeth Prelinger’s work on Kollwitz, on the other hand could perhaps be read as a reaction to feminist art history’s hesitancy in discussing the more formal aspects of Kollwitz’s work. Prelinger is the first to discuss what she refers to as Kollwitz’s “ambivalence”: both the ease of appropriating Kollwitz’s works during her career, and scholars’ difficulty placing this artist within movements or categories.8 In her essay “Kollwitz Reconsidered” from 1992 National Gallery of Art exhibition catalogue Käthe Kollwitz, Prelinger sheds new light on the 7 Feminist thought was introduced to art historical discourse by means of Linda Nochlin’s renowned essay “Why Have There Been No Great Women Artists?” in which she asks art historians to consider the societal institutions that have prevented the success of female artists. Kearns’s biography on Kollwitz, though she does place the artist in some historical context, does not follow Nochlin’s call to action for a more social art historical approach. Nochlin, “Why Have There Been No Great Women Artists?” in Women, Art, and Power: and Other Essays, ed. Linda Nochlin, (New York: Harper & Row, 1988), 169. 8 Elizabeth Prelinger, “Kollwitz Reconsidered,” in Käthe Kollwitz, ed. Elizabeth Prelinger (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1992), 77.
Recommended publications
  • Galerie Thomas Spring 2021
    SPRING 20 21 GALERIE THOMAS All works are for sale. Prices upon requesT. We refer To our sales and delivery condiTions. Dimensions: heighT by widTh by depTh. © Galerie Thomas 20 21 © VG Bild-KunsT, Bonn 20 21: Josef Albers, Hans Arp, STephan Balkenhol, Marc Chagall, Serge Charchoune, Tony Cragg, Jim Dine, OTTo Dix, Max ErnsT, HelmuT Federle, GünTher Förg, Sam Francis, RupprechT Geiger, GünTer Haese, Paul Jenkins, Yves Klein, Wifredo Lam, Fernand Léger, Roy LichTensTein, Markus LüperTz, Adolf LuTher, Marino Marini, François MorelleT, Gabriele MünTer, Louise Nevelson, Hermann NiTsch, Georg Karl Pfahler, Jaume Plensa, Serge Poliakoff, RoberT Rauschenberg, George Rickey, MarTin Spengler, GünTher Uecker, VicTor Vasarely, Bernd Zimmer © Fernando BoTero, 20 21 © Lucio FonTana by SIAE / VG Bild-KunsT, Bonn 20 21 © PeTer Halley, 20 21 © Nachlass Erich Heckel, Hemmenhofen 20 21 © Rebecca Horn / VG Bild-KunsT, Bonn 20 21 © Nachlass Jörg Immendorff 20 21 © Anselm Kiefer 20 21 © Successió Miró / VG Bild-KunsT, Bonn 20 21 © Nay – ElisabeTh Nay-Scheibler, Cologne / VG Bild-KunsT, Bonn 20 21 © STifTung Seebüll Ada und Emil Nolde 20 21 © Nam June Paik EsTaTe 20 21 © PechsTein – Hamburg/Tökendorf / VG Bild-KunsT, Bonn 20 21 © The EsTaTe of Sigmar Polke, Cologne / VG Bild-KunsT, Bonn 20 21 © Marc Quinn 20 21 © Ulrich Rückriem 20 21 © Succession Picasso / VG Bild-KunsT, Bonn 20 21 © Simon SchuberT 20 21 © The George and Helen Segal FoundaTion / VG Bild-KunsT, Bonn 20 21 © KaTja STrunz 2021 © The Andy Warhol FoundaTion for The Visual ArTs, Inc. / ArTisTs RighTs SocieTy (ARS), New York 20 21 © The EsTaTe of Tom Wesselmann / VG Bild-KunsT, Bonn 20 21 All oTher works: The arTisTs, Their esTaTes or foundaTions cover: ALEXEJ VON JAWLENSKY PorTraiT of a Girl KEES VAN DONGEN oil on cardboard, painTed on boTh sides – Farmhouse Garden, p.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fate of National Socialist Visual Culture: Iconoclasm, Censorship, and Preservation in Germany, 1945–2020
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works School of Arts & Sciences Theses Hunter College Fall 1-5-2021 The Fate of National Socialist Visual Culture: Iconoclasm, Censorship, and Preservation in Germany, 1945–2020 Denali Elizabeth Kemper CUNY Hunter College How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/hc_sas_etds/661 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] The Fate of National Socialist Visual Culture: Iconoclasm, Censorship, and Preservation in Germany, 1945–2020 By Denali Elizabeth Kemper Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Art History, Hunter College The City University of New York 2020 Thesis sponsor: January 5, 2021____ Emily Braun_________________________ Date Signature January 5, 2021____ Joachim Pissarro______________________ Date Signature Table of Contents Acronyms i List of Illustrations ii Introduction 1 Chapter 1: Points of Reckoning 14 Chapter 2: The Generational Shift 41 Chapter 3: The Return of the Repressed 63 Chapter 4: The Power of Nazi Images 74 Bibliography 93 Illustrations 101 i Acronyms CCP = Central Collecting Points FRG = Federal Republic of Germany, West Germany GDK = Grosse Deutsche Kunstaustellung (Great German Art Exhibitions) GDR = German Democratic Republic, East Germany HDK = Haus der Deutschen Kunst (House of German Art) MFAA = Monuments, Fine Arts, and Archives Program NSDAP = Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei (National Socialist German Worker’s or Nazi Party) SS = Schutzstaffel, a former paramilitary organization in Nazi Germany ii List of Illustrations Figure 1: Anonymous photographer.
    [Show full text]
  • Berger ENG Einseitig Künstlerisch
    „One-sidedly Artistic“ Georg Kolbe in the Nazi Era By Ursel Berger 0 One of the most discussed topics concerning Georg Kolbe involves his work and his stance during the Nazi era. These questions have also been at the core of all my research on Kolbe and I have frequently dealt with them in a variety of publications 1 and lectures. Kolbe’s early work and his artistic output from the nineteen twenties are admired and respected. Today, however, a widely held position asserts that his later works lack their innovative power. This view, which I also ascribe to, was not held by most of Kolbe’s contemporaries. In order to comprehend the position of this sculptor as well as his overall historical legacy, it is necessary, indeed crucial, to examine his œuvre from the Nazi era. It is an issue that also extends over and beyond the scope of a single artistic existence and poses the overriding question concerning the role of the artist in a dictatorship. Georg Kolbe was born in 1877 and died in 1947. He lived through 70 years of German history, a time characterized by the gravest of political developments, catastrophes and turning points. He grew up in the German Empire, celebrating his first artistic successes around 1910. While still quite young, he was active (with an artistic mission) in World War I. He enjoyed his greatest successes in the Weimar Republic, especially in the latter half of the nineteen twenties—between hyperinflation and the Great Depression. He was 56 years old when the Nazis came to power in 1933 and 68 years old when World War II ended in 1945.
    [Show full text]
  • Otto Nagel Wird Am 27.9. Im Berliner Stadtbezirk Wedding Geboren
    Biografie Otto Nagel (von Peter Michel jW 28.09.2019) 1894: Otto Nagel wird am 27.9. im Berliner Stadtbezirk Wedding geboren 1900–08: Besuch der Volksschule, erste künstlerische Versuche, Lehre als Glasmaler, Mitglied der Arbeiterjugend 1908–10: Teilnahme an Kundgebungen und Bildungsabenden der Arbeiterjugend, Nagel hört Reden von August Bebel, Paul Singer und Rosa Luxemburg. Er wird wegen der Teilnahme an einer 1.- Mai-Demonstration gemaßregelt, bricht die Lehre ab und verliert das Anrecht auf eine Freistelle an der Unterrichtsanstalt des Kunstgewerbemuseums, Arbeit als Lackierer 1910–12: Verschiedene Lohnarbeiten, Porträtstudien im Arbeitsamt, 1912 Mitglied der SPD 1913–15: Transportarbeiter, Besuch des Zeichenkurses der städtischen Abendschule, Zeichnen nach Gipsen, bald abgebrochen. Nagel bekennt sich als Kriegsgegner, nach Einberufung zum Armeedienst wegen schlechter körperlicher Konstitution wieder entlassen 1916–17: Erneute Einberufung; mit der Spartakus-Gruppe schließt Nagel sich der USPD an, wiederholte Zwangsrekrutierung; wegen Verweigerung des Fronteinsatzes Einweisung in das Straflager Wahn bei Köln 1918–19: Arbeitsunfall im Lager, Beteiligung an Demonstrationen, Mitglied eines Soldatenrats, Rückkehr nach Berlin, wieder Transportarbeiter, selbständige künstlerische Arbeiten. Der Kunsthistoriker Adolf Behne wählt erste Arbeiten Nagels für die Arbeiterkunstausstellung in Berlin aus 1920: Mitglied der KPD, Einreichung von Arbeiten für die Große Berliner Kunstausstellung, erstes Selbstbildnis 1921–23: Beteiligung am Berliner Märzstreik,
    [Show full text]
  • Hitler's Germania: Propaganda Writ in Stone
    Bard College Bard Digital Commons Senior Projects Spring 2017 Bard Undergraduate Senior Projects Spring 2017 Hitler's Germania: Propaganda Writ in Stone Aaron Mumford Boehlert Bard College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.bard.edu/senproj_s2017 Part of the Architectural History and Criticism Commons This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License. Recommended Citation Boehlert, Aaron Mumford, "Hitler's Germania: Propaganda Writ in Stone" (2017). Senior Projects Spring 2017. 136. https://digitalcommons.bard.edu/senproj_s2017/136 This Open Access work is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been provided to you by Bard College's Stevenson Library with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this work in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights- holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/or on the work itself. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Hitler’s Germania: Propaganda Writ in Stone Senior Project submitted to the Division of Arts of Bard College By Aaron Boehlert Annandale-on-Hudson, NY 2017 A. Boehlert 2 Acknowledgments This project would not have been possible without the infinite patience, support, and guidance of my advisor, Olga Touloumi, truly a force to be reckoned with in the best possible way. We’ve had laughs, fights, and some of the most incredible moments of collaboration, and I can’t imagine having spent this year working with anyone else.
    [Show full text]
  • Die Brücke Der Blaue Reiter Expressionists
    THE SAVAGES OF GERMANY DIE BRÜCKE DER BLAUE REITER EXPRESSIONISTS 22.09.2017– 14.01.2018 The exhibition The Savages of Germany. Die Brücke and Der DIE BRÜCKE (“The Bridge” in English) was a German artistic group founded in Blaue Reiter Expressionists offers a unique chance to view the most outstanding works of art of two pivotal art groups of 1905 in Dresden. The artists of Die Brücke abandoned visual impressions and the early 20th century. Through the oeuvre of Ernst Ludwig idyllic subject matter (typical of impressionism), wishing to describe the human Kirchner, Emil Nolde, Wassily Kandinsky, August Macke, Franz Marc, Alexej von Jawlensky and others, the exhibition inner world, full of controversies, fears and hopes. Colours in their paintings tend focuses on the innovations introduced to the art scene by to be contrastive and intense, the shapes deformed, and the details enlarged. expressionists. Expressionists dedicated themselves to the Besides the various scenes of city life, another common theme in Die Brücke’s study of major universal themes, such as the relationship between man and the universe, via various deeply personal oeuvre was scenery: when travelling through the countryside, the artists saw an artistic means. opportunity to depict man’s emotional states through nature. The group disbanded In addition to showing the works of the main authors of German expressionism, the exhibition attempts to shed light in 1913. on expressionism as an influential artistic movement of the early 20th century which left its imprint on the Estonian art DER BLAUE REITER (“The Blue Rider” in English) was another expressionist of the post-World War I era.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Introduction the Empire at the End of Decadence the Social, Scientific
    1 Introduction The Empire at the End of Decadence The social, scientific and industrial revolutions of the later nineteenth century brought with them a ferment of new artistic visions. An emphasis on scientific determinism and the depiction of reality led to the aesthetic movement known as Naturalism, which allowed the human condition to be presented in detached, objective terms, often with a minimum of moral judgment. This in turn was counterbalanced by more metaphorical modes of expression such as Symbolism, Decadence, and Aestheticism, which flourished in both literature and the visual arts, and tended to exalt subjective individual experience at the expense of straightforward depictions of nature and reality. Dismay at the fast pace of social and technological innovation led many adherents of these less realistic movements to reject faith in the new beginnings proclaimed by the voices of progress, and instead focus in an almost perverse way on the imagery of degeneration, artificiality, and ruin. By the 1890s, the provocative, anti-traditionalist attitudes of those writers and artists who had come to be called Decadents, combined with their often bizarre personal habits, had inspired the name for an age that was fascinated by the contemplation of both sumptuousness and demise: the fin de siècle. These artistic and social visions of degeneration and death derived from a variety of inspirations. The pessimistic philosophy of Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860), who had envisioned human existence as a miserable round of unsatisfied needs and desires that might only be alleviated by the contemplation of works of art or the annihilation of the self, contributed much to fin-de-siècle consciousness.1 Another significant influence may be found in the numerous writers and artists whose works served to link the themes and imagery of Romanticism 2 with those of Symbolism and the fin-de-siècle evocations of Decadence, such as William Blake, Edgar Allen Poe, Eugène Delacroix, the Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood, Charles Baudelaire, and Gustave Flaubert.
    [Show full text]
  • KARL SCHMIDT-ROTTLUFF German / Alemán, 1884–1976
    KARL SCHMIDT-ROTTLUFF German / Alemán, 1884–1976 Devotion Woodcut, 1912 Schmidt-Rotluff was one of the founding members ofDie Brücke (The Bridge) in Dresden in 1905, along with Erich Heckel, Ernst Ludwig Kirchner, and Fritz Bleyl, and joined by Emil Nolde and Max Pechstein. The group disbanded in 1913, largely due to their varying styles and independent moves to Berlin, but each remained true to their rejection of European academic painting and conventions in favor of exploring the vitality and directness of non-Western art forms, particularly West African masks and Oceanic art, as well as revitalization of the pre-Renaissance tradition of German woodcuts. Devoción Xilografía, 1912 Schmidt-Rottluff fue uno de los miembros fundadores de Die Brücke (El puente) en Dresde en 1905, junto con Erich Heckel, Ernst Ludwig Kirchner y Fritz Bleyl, grupo al que se unieron luego Emil Nolde y Max Pechstein. El grupo se disolvió en 1913, en gran parte debido a la evolución de sus estilos y a los traslados individuales de los artistas a Berlín, pero cada uno de ellos permaneció fiel al rechazo de la pintura y las convenciones academicistas europeas, en favor de la exploración de la vitalidad y la franqueza de formas artísticas no occidentales, especialmente las máscaras de África occidental y el arte de Oceanía, así como de la revitalización de la xilografía alemana de tradición prerrenacentista. Museum purchase through the Earle W. Grant Acquisition Fund, 1975.37 KARL SCHMIDT-ROTTLUFF German / Alemán, 1884–1976 Head of a Woman Woodcut, 1909 “I know that I have no program, only the unaccountable longing to grasp what I see and feel, and to find the purest means of expressing it.” Studying Japanese techniques of woodcuts, as well as the techniques of Albrecht Dürer, Paul Gauguin, and Edvard Munch, Schmidt-Rottluff produced powerful images, evoking intense psychological states through the flattening of form and retention of traces of roughly hewn wood blocks.
    [Show full text]
  • Moreau's Materiality: Polymorphic Subjects, Degeneration, and Physicality Mary C
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2009 Moreau's Materiality: Polymorphic Subjects, Degeneration, and Physicality Mary C. Slavkin Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF VISUAL ARTS, THEATRE AND DANCE MOREAU’S MATERIALITY: POLYMORPHIC SUBJECTS, DEGENERATION, AND PHYSICALITY By MARY C. SLAVKIN A Thesis submitted to the Department of Art History in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Arts Degree Awarded: Spring Semester, 2009 The Members of the Committee approve the Thesis of Mary Slavkin defended on March 30, 2009. ___________________________ Lauren Weingarden Professor Directing Thesis ___________________________ Richard Emmerson Committee Member ___________________________ Adam Jolles Committee Member Approved: _______________________________________________ Richard Emmerson, Chair, Department of Art History _______________________________________________ Sally McRorie, Dean, College of Visual Arts, Theatre and Dance The Graduate School has verified and approved the above named committee members. ii For David. Thanks for all the tea. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES..........................................................................................................v ABSTRACT.....................................................................................................................ix CHAPTER 1: Introduction...............................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • The Life and Times of the Berlin Secession Podcast
    Lindenwood University Digital Commons@Lindenwood University Theses Theses & Dissertations Spring 5-2021 The Life and Times of the Berlin Secession Podcast Chris Kitamura Lindenwood University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lindenwood.edu/theses Part of the Classical Archaeology and Art History Commons Recommended Citation Kitamura, Chris, "The Life and Times of the Berlin Secession Podcast" (2021). Theses. 7. https://digitalcommons.lindenwood.edu/theses/7 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses & Dissertations at Digital Commons@Lindenwood University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Lindenwood University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Lindenwood University School of Arts, Media, and Communications THE LIFE AND TIMES OF THE BERLIN SECESSION PODCAST by Chris Kitamura Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master Arts in Art History At Lindenwood University May 2021, Christopher Kitamura The author hereby grants Lindenwood University permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic thesis copies of document in whole or in part in any medium now known or hereafter created. 2 2 Chris Kitamura______________________________________________4/22/21 Author Kelly Scheffer _________________________________________________ Committee chair Dr. Piper Hutson__________________________________________________4/27/2021 Committee member 4/27/21 Clayton
    [Show full text]
  • Heinrich Zille's Berlin Selected Themes from 1900
    "/v9 6a~ts1 HEINRICH ZILLE'S BERLIN SELECTED THEMES FROM 1900 TO 1914: THE TRIUMPH OF 'ART FROM THE GUTTER' THESIS Presented to the Graduate Council of the North Texas State University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS By Catherine Simke Nordstrom Denton, Texas May, 1985 Copyright by Catherine Simke Nordstrom 1985 Nordstrom, Catherine Simke, Heinrich Zille's Berlin Selected Themes from 1900 to 1914: The Trium of 'Art from the Gutter.' Master of Arts (Art History), May, 1985, 139 pp., 71 illustrations, bibliography, 64 titles. Heinrich Zille (1858-1929), an artist whose creative vision was concentrated on Berlin's working class, portrayed urban life with devastating accuracy and earthy humor. His direct and often crude rendering linked his drawings and prints with other artists who avoided sentimentality and idealization in their works. In fact, Zille first exhibited with the Berlin Secession in 1901, only months after Kaiser Wilhelm II denounced such art as Rinnsteinkunst, or 'art from the gutter.' Zille chose such themes as the resultant effects of over-crowded, unhealthy living conditions, the dissolution of the family, loss of personal dignity and economic exploi tation endured by the working class. But Zille also showed their entertainments, their diversions, their excesses. In so doing, Zille laid bare the grim and the droll realities of urban life, perceived with a steady, unflinching gaze. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS . S S S . vi CHRONOLOGY . xi Chapter I. INTRODUCTION . 5 . 1 II. AN OVERVIEW: BERLIN, ART AND ZILLE . 8 III. "ART FROM THE GUTTER:" ZILLE'S THEMATIC CHOICES .
    [Show full text]
  • Paul Klee, Mar.13-April 2, 1930
    Paul Klee, Mar.13-April 2, 1930 Author Museum of Modern Art (New York, N.Y.) Date 1930 Publisher The Museum of Modern Art Exhibition URL www.moma.org/calendar/exhibitions/1766 The Museum of Modern Art's exhibition history—from our founding in 1929 to the present—is available online. It includes exhibition catalogues, primary documents, installation views, and an index of participating artists. MoMA © 2017 The Museum of Modern Art MUSEUM OF MODERN ART 730 FIFTHAVE NEW YORK BMHanb . PAUL K L E E VyNy-T* MARCH 13 1930 APRIL 2 MUSEUM OF MODERN ART 730 FIFTH AVENUE NEW YORK ACKNOWLEDGMENT The exhibition has been made possible primarily through the generous co-operation of the artist's representatives, The Flechtheim Gallery of Berlin, and the J. B. Neumann Gallery of New York. The following have also generously lent pictures: Mr. Philip C. Johnson, Cleve land; The Gallery of Living Art, New York University; The Weyhe Gallery, New York. Thanks are extended to them on behalf of the Trustees and the Staff of the Museum of Modern Art. TRUSTEES A. CONGER GOODYEAR, PRESIDENT MISS L. P. BLISS, VICE-PRESIDENT MRS. JOHN D. ROCKEFELLER, JR., TREASURER FRANK CROWN IN SHI ELD, SECRETARY WILLIAM T. ALDRICH FREDERIC C. BARTLETT STEPHEN C. CLARK MRS. W. MURRAY CRANE CHESTER DALE SAMUEL A. LEWISOHN DUNCAN PHILLIPS MRS. RAINEY ROGERS PAUL J. SACHS MRS. CORNELIUS J. SULIVAN ALFRED H. BARR, JR., Director J ERE ABBOTT, Associate Director 5 Note — On the front cover of this Catalog is a sim plified zinc cut of Klee's Portrait of an Equilibrist.
    [Show full text]