The Boulder Darter: a Conservation Challenge

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Boulder Darter: a Conservation Challenge The Boulder Darter: A Conservation Challenge Noel M. Burkhead and James D. Williams ' The boulder darter (Etheostoma wapiti) is a small-sized member of the perch fam- ily. In general, darters are a diverse group of bottom-dwelling fishes (about 140 species in the United States) that typically flourish in clean, flowing creeks and riv- ers. Unfortunately, when darters are brought to the attention of the public, the news too frequently is about the de- cline or demise of a species. Such is the case for this small fish. The boulder darter was listed by the Fish and Wildlife Service as an Endan- gered species in 1988. Its only surviving population is found in the Elk River, a large tributary system of the Tennessee River in southern Tennessee and north- ern Alabama. The primary reasons it needed listing protection were its reduced distribution and the vulnerability of its This male boulder is guarding its nest site. The eggs are present at the right margin of the remaining habitat. The boulder darter is nest cavity. currently restricted to about 63 miles Ford Dam from warm to cold water; im- (101 kilometers) of the main channel of The loss of biological adaptability in a species poundment of the lower Elk River by di- the lower Elk River and a few of its larger directly arises from the loss of its genetic tributaries. However, the species is not Wheeler Reservoir; fluctuating water lev- versity, which is a consequence of the species distributed continuously within this els from power generation at Tims Ford losing segments of its total population. Reservoir; industrial, municipal, and agri- The spotty occurrence of the boulder range, but is found at only six sites in the cultural pollution; and extensive siltation darter in the Elk River results in part main channel and three sites in two of from soil erosion. The primary reason from the rarity of its preferred habitat. As the tributaries. Historically, the boulder for the demise of the boulder darter in its common name suggests, the boulder darter also lived in Shoal Creek, a tribu- tary of the Tennessee River in northern Shoal Creek was the impoundment of darter lives among boulders. However, it the lower creek by Wilson Reservoir, silt- Alabama, but that population has been is not found among boulders anywhere extirpated. ation from agricultural erosion, and pol- in the river bed; the location of the boul- lution from upstream municipalities in Extinction of the boulder darter may ders is important. The boulders must Alabama. Other populations of the boul- occur in water 2 to 4 feet (0.6 to 1.2 follow in the next 10 to 20 years unless some way can be found to increase the der darter probably existed in the Tennes- meters) in depth. Also, the boulders number and size of the populations that see River once but were extirpated by im- must occur in flowing water that is not poundments before they were detected. too swift, such as in riffles or rapids, and still survive. This fish shares some at- These powerfid forces degrading the Elk not too slow, as in slightly flowing pools. tributes with the Maryland darter River ecosystem have reduced the boulder Most of the Elk River between the (Etheostorna se/Lire,), a species that some experts now believe to be extinct. darter population to small, isolated subpopu- reaches affected by impoundment con- lations, an alarmingly fiimiliar pattern in sists of long, heavily silted pools that have southeastern rare fishes (some of which were little or no boulder substrate. .I-he rela- Reasons for Decline relatively common only 20 to 30 years ago). tivelv few riffles and runs are predomi- N lamy human-caused factors contrib- When the population of a species hcconìes nately floored with gravel and rubble sub- uted to the decline of the boulder darter. highly fragmented, the species loses its ability strates. At two of the six sites that harbor In the Elk River, the principal impacts to respond to the extremes of nature. For boulder darters, the boulders are in fact were impoundment of the upper river example, it may no longer be able to survive parts from old collapsed structures, a section by Tims Ford Reservoir; thermal extended periods of severe weather, disease, stone bridge and a spillway darn. [he alteration of the tailwaters below Tims or dramatic fluctuations in food sources. (0,1thated 11»1 4 ENDANGERED SPECIES TECHNICAL BULLETIN Vol. XVII Nos. 3-8 (1992) I Boulder Darter The artificial stream is a 4 by 8 foot gravel or a boulder and pieces of rubble, (,,,itinIfed fist)!!1 previous page) (1.2 by 2.4 m) plexiglass aquarium in although a space created between a boul- which current is generated by an electric der and bedrock might be acceptable; 2) survival of the boulder darter is amazing trolling motor. We mimicked important it must have a wedge-shaped configura- considering the rarity of its preferred aspects of the boulder darter's habitat in tion, with the two boulders touching at a habitat and the severe and chronic degra- the artificial stream, notably flow, tem- relative narrow angle, creating a space dation of the Elk River. perature. photoperiod, and substrate into which the female wedges her eggs; 3) composition. The boulder darters the site must have current flowing across spawned in May and June 1991, yielding it; 4) the cavity must be roughly horizon- Laboratory Observations the first observations of reproduction for tal (no vertical or nearly vertical spaces Biologists have long recognized the this Endangered species. What we were selected); and 5) the boulders must critical importance of knowing the repro- learned in this short period provided im- not only be in the correct depth and cur- ductive biology of an' imperiled species, portant insight into the inherent frailties rent ranges, but they must also occur in a especially for developing conservation of this darter at the critical point of creat- certain configuration relative to the cur- measures to protect and recover the spe- ing the next generation. rent and to each other. cies. Until recently, however, virtually The critical importance of current flow nothing was known about the life history across the nest space was revealed when of the boulder darter. Our first goal in Reproductive Habitat one trolling motor failed during a week- research on this species was to observe its The boulder darter spawns in the same end. All of the eggs in that nest died. spawning behavior and to identifY the habitat in which it normally lives: boulders Current is obviously important for oxy- area(s) of the river that served as spawn- in flowing water with a velocity of about 1 to genating the eggs and possibly for keep- ing habitat. Unfortunately, observing 2 feet (0.3 to 0.6 m) per second. The boul- ing the egg surface swept free of particu- boulder darter spawning behavior was der darter belongs to a reproductive guild of late debris and silt. This observation also not possible in the Elk River because of darters known as egg clusterers because the suggests that the persistent siltation of the the water's consistent turbidity. Further, eggs are laid in clusters in spaces beneath Elk River must be very limiting to the the river below 'Finis Ford Darn is subject rocks. The male darter remains at the nest survival of egg and possibly larval life to significant water level fluctuations re- site and aggressively guards the eggs against stages of the boulder darter. It is well sulting from power generation at the intruders. known that silt will smother fish eggs, darn. In order to overcome the obstacles The male boulder darter is picky about and species such as the boulder darter to studying the darter in its natural envi- the spaces he selects for nest cavities. In that spawn on the bottom are the most ronment, 10 darters were captured, trans- fact, the nesting sites must have specific vulnerable. ported to Gainesville. Florida, and placed attributes: I) the space MUSE be between A critical insight gleaned from these in an artificial stream. two boulders, not between a boulder and observations is that fluctuating water lev- els from power generation (2 to 3 feet changes in depth) must significantly alter the specific habitat features (depth and water velocity) of the nest cavity the male selected for spawning. It is quite possible that some boulder darter nests may be left stranded out of the water when water levels drop during periods of decreased power generation. Conversely, if a male spawned in a nest cavity during low water levels, how would the survival of the eggs be affected during high water levels? It is possible that fluctuating water levels may be reducing. perhaps significantly, the re- productive success of this Endangered species. What will be the fate of the boulder darter? At this time, we simply don't know. State and Federal agencies will work together and attempt to patch the An artificial stream was used to mimic important habitat features of the boulder darter. The (coutimied on ,gi ,. video camera was set up to record behavior. ' g 6; ENDANGERED SPECIES TECHNICAL BULLETIN Vol. XVII Nos. 3-8 (1992) 5 Boulder Darter (continued/Tom page 5i ecosystem wounds created by the hand of the human species. Perhaps some ways can be found to create new habitat. Arti- ficial propagation may also play an im- portant role in the recovery of this imper- iled fish. One thing is fairly certain: if nothing is done, the boulder darter. like the Maryland darter, will slip from the face of the earth.
Recommended publications
  • The Search for the Maryland Darter
    The Search for the Maryland Darter The search is on for the Maryland darter, a federally-endangered fish that has not been seen for over 20 years and is feared extinct. Biologists from Frostburg State University, Marshall University in West Virginia, and the Maryland Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) have teamed up to determine once and for all if this rare species still swims in Maryland wa- ters. In 2009 and 2010, they will be surveying the waters of the Susquehanna River between Conowingo Dam and Havre de Grace and three Harford County streams for this exceedingly rare species. What is the Maryland darter? The Maryland darter is one the rarest fishes in the world and is only known from Swan, Gasheys, and Deer creeks in Harford County, Maryland. It is a small bottom-dwell- ing species related to yellow perch and walleye. Unlike these other fishes, adult Maryland darters are small; reach- ing a maximum size of just under 3 inches on a diet com- prised of small insects and snails. It was last seen in 1988 in Deer Creek. For more information on Maryland darters and why it is an important species visit http://www.dnr. state.md.us/wildlife/mddarter.asp Maryland darters may swim undetected on the bottom of the large Susquehanna River between Conowingo Dam and Havre de Grace, Maryland. Biologists from MDNR, Frostburg State University, and Marshall University will survey the river for this rare species in 2009 and 2010. Does the Maryland darter still exist? Since 1988, regional ichthyologists and fish enthusiasts have made many valiant, but futile attempts to find this species leading many to believe that the Maryland darter has joined the long and growing list of recent extinctions.
    [Show full text]
  • Maryland Darter Etheostoma Sellare
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Maryland darter Etheostoma Sellare Introduction The Maryland darter is a small freshwater fish only known from a limited area in Harford County, Maryland. These areas, Swan Creek, Gashey’s Run (a tributary of Swan Creek) and Deer Creek, are part of the larger Susquehanna River drainage basin. Originally discovered in Swan Creek nymphs. Spawning is assumed to species of darters. Electrotrawling is in 1912, the Maryland darter has not occur during late April, based on other the method of towing a net from a boat been seen here since and only small species, but no Maryland darters have with electrodes attached to the net that numbers of individuals have been been observed during reproduction. send small, harmless pulses through found in Gashey’s Run and Deer the water to stir up fish. Electrofishing Creek. A Rare Species efforts in the Susquehanna are Some biologists suspect that the continuing. Due to its scarcity, the Maryland Maryland darter could be hiding darter was federally listed as in the deep, murky waters of the A lack of adequate surveying of endangered in 1967, and critical Susquehanna River. Others worry large rivers in the past due to limited habitat was designated in 1984. The that the decreased darter population technology leaves hope for finding darter is also state listed. The last is evidence that the desirable habitat Maryland darters in this area. The new known sighting of the darter was in for these fish has diminished, possibly studies would likely provide definitive 1988. due to water quality degradation and information on the population status effects of residential development of the Maryland darter and a basis for Characteristics in the watershed.
    [Show full text]
  • Endangered Species
    FEATURE: ENDANGERED SPECIES Conservation Status of Imperiled North American Freshwater and Diadromous Fishes ABSTRACT: This is the third compilation of imperiled (i.e., endangered, threatened, vulnerable) plus extinct freshwater and diadromous fishes of North America prepared by the American Fisheries Society’s Endangered Species Committee. Since the last revision in 1989, imperilment of inland fishes has increased substantially. This list includes 700 extant taxa representing 133 genera and 36 families, a 92% increase over the 364 listed in 1989. The increase reflects the addition of distinct populations, previously non-imperiled fishes, and recently described or discovered taxa. Approximately 39% of described fish species of the continent are imperiled. There are 230 vulnerable, 190 threatened, and 280 endangered extant taxa, and 61 taxa presumed extinct or extirpated from nature. Of those that were imperiled in 1989, most (89%) are the same or worse in conservation status; only 6% have improved in status, and 5% were delisted for various reasons. Habitat degradation and nonindigenous species are the main threats to at-risk fishes, many of which are restricted to small ranges. Documenting the diversity and status of rare fishes is a critical step in identifying and implementing appropriate actions necessary for their protection and management. Howard L. Jelks, Frank McCormick, Stephen J. Walsh, Joseph S. Nelson, Noel M. Burkhead, Steven P. Platania, Salvador Contreras-Balderas, Brady A. Porter, Edmundo Díaz-Pardo, Claude B. Renaud, Dean A. Hendrickson, Juan Jacobo Schmitter-Soto, John Lyons, Eric B. Taylor, and Nicholas E. Mandrak, Melvin L. Warren, Jr. Jelks, Walsh, and Burkhead are research McCormick is a biologist with the biologists with the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis Improving Rock Ramp Fishways for Small-Bodied
    THESIS IMPROVING ROCK RAMP FISHWAYS FOR SMALL-BODIED GREAT PLAINS FISHES Submitted by Tyler R. Swarr Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the Degree of Master of Science Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado Summer 2018 Master’s Committee: Advisor: Christopher A. Myrick Kevin R. Bestgen Brian P. Bledsoe Copyright by Tyler R. Swarr 2018 All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT IMPROVING ROCK RAMP FISHWAYS FOR SMALL-BODIED GREAT PLAINS FISHES The growing global need to improve the longitudinal connectivity of lotic systems is often met by using fish passage structures (fishways). When designing fishways in the past, biologists and engineers focused primarily on strong swimming species such as salmonids. However, the majority of riverine species in the interior United States are not salmonids and may be excluded by fishways built using salmonid criteria due to lower swimming abilities and/or behavioral differences. I designed and built a 9.1-m long adjustable hydraulic research flume at the Colorado State University Foothills Fisheries Laboratory (FFL) to test fish passage and evaluate the effects of grade (slopes of 2 – 10%, in 2% increments) on the passage success of three Great Plains fish species: Flathead Chub Platygobio gracilis, Stonecat Noturus flavus, and Arkansas Darter Etheostoma cragini. A 6.1-m long rock ramp fishway was installed in the flume and four PIT tag antennas were used to detect full or partial passage success. In order to test the key assumption that tagging does not affect fish performance, I evaluated the impacts of 8-mm PIT tags on Arkansas Darter and found no significant difference in the survival and swimming abilities of PIT tagged fish versus non-tagged fish.
    [Show full text]
  • Extinction Rates in North American Freshwater Fishes, 1900–2010 Author(S): Noel M
    Extinction Rates in North American Freshwater Fishes, 1900–2010 Author(s): Noel M. Burkhead Source: BioScience, 62(9):798-808. 2012. Published By: American Institute of Biological Sciences URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.1525/bio.2012.62.9.5 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. Articles Extinction Rates in North American Freshwater Fishes, 1900–2010 NOEL M. BURKHEAD Widespread evidence shows that the modern rates of extinction in many plants and animals exceed background rates in the fossil record. In the present article, I investigate this issue with regard to North American freshwater fishes. From 1898 to 2006, 57 taxa became extinct, and three distinct populations were extirpated from the continent. Since 1989, the numbers of extinct North American fishes have increased by 25%. From the end of the nineteenth century to the present, modern extinctions varied by decade but significantly increased after 1950 (post-1950s mean = 7.5 extinct taxa per decade).
    [Show full text]
  • Key to the Freshwater Fishes of Maryland Key to the Freshwater Fishes of Maryland
    KEY TO THE FRESHWATER FISHES OF MARYLAND KEY TO THE FRESHWATER FISHES OF MARYLAND Compiled by P.F. Kazyak; R.L. Raesly Graphics by D.A. Neely This key to the freshwater fishes of Maryland was prepared for the Maryland Biological Stream Survey to support field and laboratory identifications of fishes known to occur or potentially occurring in Maryland waters. A number of existing taxonomic keys were used to prepare the initial version of this key to provide a more complete set of identifiable features for each species and minimize the possibility of incorrectly identifying new or newly introduced species. Since that time, we have attempted to remove less useful information from the key and have enriched the key by adding illustrations. Users of this key should be aware of the possibility of taking a fish species not listed, especially in areas near the head-of- tide. Glossary of anatomical terms Ammocoete - Larval lamprey. Lateral field - Area of scales between anterior and posterior fields. Basal - Toward the base or body of an object. Mandible - Lower jaw. Branchial groove - Horizontal groove along which the gill openings are aligned in lampreys. Mandibular pores - Series of pores on the ventral surface of mandible. Branchiostegal membranes - Membranes extending below the opercles and connecting at the throat. Maxillary - Upper jaw. Branchiostegal ray - Splint-like bone in the branchiostegal Myomeres - Dorsoventrally oriented muscle bundle on side of fish. membranes. Myoseptum - Juncture between myomeres. Caudal peduncle - Slender part of body between anal and caudal fin. Palatine teeth - Small teeth just posterior or lateral to the medial vomer.
    [Show full text]
  • Extinction Rates in North American Freshwater Fishes, 19002010
    Extinction Rates in North American Freshwater Fishes, 1900–2010 Author(s): Noel M. Burkhead Reviewed work(s): Source: BioScience, Vol. 62, No. 9 (September 2012), pp. 798-808 Published by: University of California Press on behalf of the American Institute of Biological Sciences Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/bio.2012.62.9.5 . Accessed: 21/09/2012 12:59 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. University of California Press and American Institute of Biological Sciences are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to BioScience. http://www.jstor.org Articles Articles Extinction Rates in North American Freshwater Fishes, 1900–2010 NOEL M. BURKHEAD Widespread evidence shows that the modern rates of extinction in many plants and animals exceed background rates in the fossil record. In the present article, I investigate this issue with regard to North American freshwater fishes. From 1898 to 2006, 57 taxa became extinct, and three distinct populations were extirpated from the continent. Since 1989, the numbers of extinct North American fishes have increased by 25%. From the end of the nineteenth century to the present, modern extinctions varied by decade but significantly increased after 1950 (post-1950s mean = 7.5 extinct taxa per decade).
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Status of Imperiled North American Freshwater And
    FEATURE: ENDANGERED SPECIES Conservation Status of Imperiled North American Freshwater and Diadromous Fishes ABSTRACT: This is the third compilation of imperiled (i.e., endangered, threatened, vulnerable) plus extinct freshwater and diadromous fishes of North America prepared by the American Fisheries Society’s Endangered Species Committee. Since the last revision in 1989, imperilment of inland fishes has increased substantially. This list includes 700 extant taxa representing 133 genera and 36 families, a 92% increase over the 364 listed in 1989. The increase reflects the addition of distinct populations, previously non-imperiled fishes, and recently described or discovered taxa. Approximately 39% of described fish species of the continent are imperiled. There are 230 vulnerable, 190 threatened, and 280 endangered extant taxa, and 61 taxa presumed extinct or extirpated from nature. Of those that were imperiled in 1989, most (89%) are the same or worse in conservation status; only 6% have improved in status, and 5% were delisted for various reasons. Habitat degradation and nonindigenous species are the main threats to at-risk fishes, many of which are restricted to small ranges. Documenting the diversity and status of rare fishes is a critical step in identifying and implementing appropriate actions necessary for their protection and management. Howard L. Jelks, Frank McCormick, Stephen J. Walsh, Joseph S. Nelson, Noel M. Burkhead, Steven P. Platania, Salvador Contreras-Balderas, Brady A. Porter, Edmundo Díaz-Pardo, Claude B. Renaud, Dean A. Hendrickson, Juan Jacobo Schmitter-Soto, John Lyons, Eric B. Taylor, and Nicholas E. Mandrak, Melvin L. Warren, Jr. Jelks, Walsh, and Burkhead are research McCormick is a biologist with the biologists with the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Rare, Threatened, and Endangered Animals of Maryland
    List of Rare, Threatened, and Endangered Animals of Maryland December 2016 Maryland Wildlife and Heritage Service Natural Heritage Program Larry Hogan, Governor Mark Belton, Secretary Wildlife & Heritage Service Natural Heritage Program Tawes State Office Building, E-1 580 Taylor Avenue Annapolis, MD 21401 410-260-8540 Fax 410-260-8596 dnr.maryland.gov Additional Telephone Contact Information: Toll free in Maryland: 877-620-8DNR ext. 8540 OR Individual unit/program toll-free number Out of state call: 410-260-8540 Text Telephone (TTY) users call via the Maryland Relay The facilities and services of the Maryland Department of Natural Resources are available to all without regard to race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, age, national origin or physical or mental disability. This document is available in alternative format upon request from a qualified individual with disability. Cover photo: A mating pair of the Appalachian Jewelwing (Calopteryx angustipennis), a rare damselfly in Maryland. (Photo credit, James McCann) ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Maryland Department of Natural Resources would like to express sincere appreciation to the many scientists and naturalists who willingly share information and provide their expertise to further our mission of conserving Maryland’s natural heritage. Publication of this list is made possible by taxpayer donations to Maryland’s Chesapeake Bay and Endangered Species Fund. Suggested citation: Maryland Natural Heritage Program. 2016. List of Rare, Threatened, and Endangered Animals of Maryland. Maryland Department of Natural Resources, 580 Taylor Avenue, Annapolis, MD 21401. 03-1272016-633. INTRODUCTION The following list comprises 514 native Maryland animals that are among the least understood, the rarest, and the most in need of conservation efforts.
    [Show full text]
  • NRSA 2013/14 Field Operations Manual Appendices (Pdf)
    National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2013/14 Field Operations Manual Version 1.1, April 2013 Appendix A: Equipment & Supplies Appendix Equipment A: & Supplies A-1 National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2013/14 Field Operations Manual Version 1.1, April 2013 pendix Equipment A: & Supplies Ap A-2 National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2013/14 Field Operations Manual Version 1.1, April 2013 Base Kit: A Base Kit will be provided to the field crews for all sampling sites that they will go to. Some items are sent in the base kit as extra supplies to be used as needed. Item Quantity Protocol Antibiotic Salve 1 Fish plug Centrifuge tube stand 1 Chlorophyll A Centrifuge tubes (screw-top, 50-mL) (extras) 5 Chlorophyll A Periphyton Clinometer 1 Physical Habitat CST Berger SAL 20 Automatic Level 1 Physical Habitat Delimiter – 12 cm2 area 1 Periphyton Densiometer - Convex spherical (modified with taped V) 1 Physical Habitat D-frame Kick Net (500 µm mesh, 52” handle) 1 Benthics Filteration flask (with silicone stopped and adapter) 1 Enterococci, Chlorophyll A, Periphyton Fish weigh scale(s) 1 Fish plug Fish Voucher supplies 1 pack Fish Voucher Foil squares (aluminum, 3x6”) 1 pack Chlorophyll A Periphyton Gloves (nitrile) 1 box General Graduated cylinder (25 mL) 1 Periphyton Graduated cylinder (250 mL) 1 Chlorophyll A, Periphyton HDPE bottle (1 L, white, wide-mouth) (extras) 12 Benthics, Fish Vouchers HDPE bottle (500 mL, white, wide-mouth) with graduations 1 Periphyton Laboratory pipette bulb 1 Fish Plug Microcentrifuge tubes containing glass beads
    [Show full text]
  • Species Action Plan: Chesapeake Logperch (Percina Bimaculata)
    Species Action Plan Chesapeake Logperch Natural Diversity Section April 2015 Species Action Plan: Chesapeake Logperch (Percina bimaculata) Chesapeake Logperch (Percina bimaculata). Credit: Rob Criswell. Purpose and Goals restricted to the Chesapeake Bay watershed. Purpose: This Species Action Plan is an initial Near (2008) stated that genetic analyses of five-year blueprint for actions to address near- Logperch and Chesapeake Logperch did not term and long-term goals for the conservation and result in monophyletic groups and that the recovery of the Chesapeake Logperch. As new Chesapeake Logperch was morphologically information becomes available this document will distinct in multiple characters from other be updated to reflect progress toward those goals. logperches. The Chesapeake Logperch usually has the following combination of characters: 7 to Goals: The near-term goal is to maintain extant 11 irregular lateral bars; orange-yellow band in populations of Chesapeake Logperch in the the first dorsal fin (poorly defined in females), Commonwealth and to protect its habitat. A nape of adults naked, breast naked except for secondary near-term goal is to describe the modified breast scales, supraoccipital and pre- autecology of the Chesapeake Logperch (i.e., the pectoral naked, and no pre-pectoral blotch. The relationship of this species with its habitat and Logperch has many more regular lateral bars, other species) and develop appropriate re- higher scale counts, and no orange-yellow on the introduction and monitoring strategies. The long- first dorsal fin. term goal is to sufficiently secure the species for its removal from the Pennsylvania list of Life-History and Habitat: Little information is threatened species (58 Pa.
    [Show full text]
  • Northeast Aquatic Habitat Classification System
    Northeast Aquatic Habitat Classification System Arlene P. Olivero, Aquatic Ecologist Mark G. Anderson, Director of Conservation Science The Nature Conservancy Eastern Regional Office Boston, MA In Collaboration with the Northeast Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies September 30, 2008 1 Table of Contents List of Figures and Tables Project Goal Products Background Team Methods A. Agreeing on a Classification Approach B. The Base Hydrology Map C. Defining Aquatic Habitat Types Streams and Rivers Key Variables 1. Size 2. Gradient: 3. Geology, Buffering Capacity: 4. Temperature Combining Variables into Types Simplifying the Classification 1. Variable Prioritization 2. Within Variable Collapsing Rules 3. Biotically Insignificant Combinations Example of a Simplified Classification Additional Attributes Lakes and Ponds Key Variable: Size Additional Attributes Calculated for Each Lake: Geology Elevation Shoreline Sinuosity Connectivity 2 Additional Attributes Not Calculated for Each Lake: Depth Placement within a Larger Spatial Stratification Future Improvements and Applications of the Classification 1. Condition Reporting: 2. Biota Relationships: 3. Sub-Freshwater Ecoregionalization 4. Lake Classification Appendix I: Metadata Describing Distributed GIS Datasets and Attribute Tables Appendix II: Workgroup Members Appendix III: Full Riverine Aquatic Habitat Types (7764), 259 types Appendix IV: Simplifed Aquatic Habitat Types (4433), 92 types Appendix V: Freshwater Ecoregions References Excel Table: Original_state_aquatic_types.xls 3 List
    [Show full text]