DOCSLIB.ORG

2003 RDX Proceedings

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2003 RDX Proceedings RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT EXCHANGE PROCEEDINGS: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ISSUES TO ENSURE TRUSTWORTHINESS IN TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS THAT DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY IMPACT NATIONAL SECURITY AND EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS A SYMPOSIUM SPONSORED BY THE PRESIDENT’S NSTAC IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE WHITE HOUSE OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY AND THE GEORGIA TECH INFORMATION SECURITY CENTER AT THE GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ATLANTA, GEORGIA MARCH 13-14, 2003 The President’s National Security Telecommunications Advisory Committee MEMORANDUM FOR THE INDUSTRY EXECUTIVE SUBCOMMITTEE SUBJECT: 2003 NSTAC Research and Development Exchange Proceedings On March 13-14, 2003, the President’s National Security Telecommunications Advisory Committee (NSTAC) held its fifth Research and Development (R&D) Exchange, in co- sponsorship with the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) and the Georgia Tech Information Security Center (GTISC) at the Georgia Institute of Technology. The event was hosted at the Georgia Centers for Advanced Telecommunications Technology in Atlanta, Georgia. The purpose of the event was to: 1) Explore and prioritize key R&D issues related to the trustworthiness of national security and emergency preparedness (NS/EP) telecommunications and the related, networked information systems; 2) Identify and frame key R&D related policy issues associated with the trustworthiness of NS/EP telecommunications and related information systems for future consideration and study by the President’s NSTAC; 3) Provide input to the OSTP in its preparation of the President’s R&D agenda and budgetary requests; and 4) Identify and characterize barriers and impediments that inhibit the R&D of trustworthy networked information systems. Participants engaged in discussion and debate not only during breakout and plenary sessions but also during their breaks and meals. All contributions were “not-for-attribution” unless specifically approved by the contributor. The participants collectively identified several issues or concerns regarding or impacting the trustworthiness of NS/EP telecommunications and information systems, including: a sense of frustration and urgency regarding what they perceived as a lack of substantive action on cyber security issues; the need to improve threat identification and analysis and improve methods to share and use that information across industry, Government, and academia; the need to strike a balance between better engineering of software and hardware with efforts to improve human factors; and the realization that the definition and nature of NS/EP telecommunications continued to change. The insights, conclusions, and recommendations contained within these Proceedings result from the Exchange and are solely attributable to the combined and unique contributions of Exchange participants and invited speakers. The results indicate that the Industry Executive Subcommittee and the NSTAC should continue to work with OSTP and other NSTAC stakeholders to explore key issues related to R&D of NS/EP telecommunications and information systems. The R&D Exchange Task Force greatly appreciates the support of the OSTP, Georgia Tech, and our breakout session facilitators. In particular, we thank the Director of OSTP, the Honorable Dr. John H. Marburger, for his personal engagement, which contributed greatly to the event’s success. We thank Dr. Seymour E. Goodman, Professor of Computing and International Affairs, R&D Exchange i The President’s National Security Telecommunications Advisory Committee Georgia Tech, and Co-Director, GTISC, for his untiring support and contributions. We are grateful as well to the many staff and contract support contributors who performed so well, attending to so many details. Finally, many thanks to the co-sponsoring companies acknowledged in the Proceedings. Respectfully, Guy L. Copeland, CSC Chair, Research and Development Exchange Task Force ii R&D Exchange The President’s National Security Telecommunications Advisory Committee ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The President’s National Security Telecommunications Advisory Committee (NSTAC) would like to thank the representatives from industry, Government, and academia who participated in the fifth Research and Development (R&D) Exchange held in conjunction with the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) and the Georgia Tech Information Security Center at the Georgia Institute of Technology from March 13 to 14, 2003, in Atlanta, Georgia. NSTAC would especially like to acknowledge the important contributions of the OSTP; the Office of the Manager, National Communications System; and the Georgia Institute of Technology for the planning of the 2003 R&D Exchange. Special thanks also go to our Keynote Speaker, the Honorable Dr. John H. Marburger, Director, OSTP; our Luncheon Speaker, Mr. F. Duane Ackerman, Vice-Chair of the President’s NSTAC, and Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, BellSouth; and our hosts at the Georgia Institute of Technology, Dr. G. Wayne Clough, President of the Georgia Institute of Technology; Dr. Richard DeMillo, Imlay Dean of Computing and Director, Georgia Tech Information Security Center; and Dr. Seymour Goodman, Professor of Computing and International Affairs, and Co-Director of the Georgia Tech Information Security Center. We would also like to thank our breakout session facilitators, Dr. Carl Landwehr, National Science Foundation; Mr. Sami Saydjari, Cyber Defense Agency; Mr. David Barron, BellSouth; Dr. Marisa Reddy, U.S. Secret Service; Mr. Michael Vatis, Dartmouth College; Mr. Scott Charney, Microsoft; Dr. Stephen Squires, Hewlett-Packard; Mr. Shannon Kellogg, Information Technology Association of America; Mr. Phillip Lacombe, Veridian; and Mr. Jim Craft, Raytheon. Finally, NSTAC would like to thank the following organizations for sponsoring the 2003 NSTAC R&D Exchange: Conference Co-Sponsors NSTAC Sponsors of R&D Exchange Events R&D Exchange iii The President’s National Security Telecommunications Advisory Committee TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................... ES-1 1. INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................1-1 1.1 BACKGROUND .........................................................................................................1-1 1.2 PURPOSE....................................................................................................................1-2 1.3 PROCEEDINGS ORGANIZATION...........................................................................1-2 2. OPENING PLENARY SESSION.......................................................................................2-1 2.1 KEYNOTE ADDRESS...............................................................................................2-1 2.2 NSTAC OVERVIEW..................................................................................................2-2 3. LUNCHEON PRESENTATION........................................................................................3-1 4. BREAKOUT SESSIONS ....................................................................................................4-1 4.1 CYBER SECURITY AND SOFTWARE, GROUP I..................................................4-1 4.1.1 THE CURRENT OPERATING ENVIRONMENT ........................................4-1 4.1.2 RESEARCH PRIORITIES..............................................................................4-2 4.1.3 THE PATH FORWARD.................................................................................4-3 4.2 CYBER SECURITY AND SOFTWARE, GROUP II ................................................4-3 4.2.1 THE CURRENT OPERATING ENVIRONMENT ........................................4-3 4.2.2 RESEARCH PRIORITIES..............................................................................4-4 4.2.3 IMPEDIMENTS TO R&D..............................................................................4-4 4.2.4 THE PATH FORWARD.................................................................................4-5 4.3 HUMAN FACTORS...................................................................................................4-5 4.3.1 THE CURRENT OPERATING ENVIRONMENT ........................................4-5 4.3.2 RESEARCH PRIORITIES..............................................................................4-7 4.3.3 IMPEDIMENTS TO R&D..............................................................................4-7 4.3.4 THE PATH FORWARD.................................................................................4-8 4.4 PHYSICAL SECURITY.............................................................................................4-8 4.4.1 THE CURRENT OPERATING ENVIRONMENT ........................................4-9 4.4.2 RESEARCH PRIORITIES..............................................................................4-9 4.4.3 IMPEDIMENTS TO R&D............................................................................4-10 4.4.4 THE PATH FORWARD...............................................................................4-11 4.5 INTEGRATION ........................................................................................................4-11 4.5.1 CURRENT RESEARCH AND OPERATING ENVIRONMENTS .............4-11 4.5.2 PRIORITIES FOR RESEARCH INTEGRATION .......................................4-12 4.5.3 IMPEDIMENTS TO RESEARCH INTEGRATION....................................4-12
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1 in the SUPERIOR COURT of FULTON COUNTY STATE of GEORGIA DONNA CURLING, an Individual; ) ) COALITION for GOOD ) GOVERNANC
    IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF FULTON COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA DONNA CURLING, an individual; ) ) COALITION FOR GOOD ) GOVERNANCE, a non-profit corporation ) organized and existing under Colorado ) Law; ) ) DONNA PRICE, an individual; ) ) JEFFREY SCHOENBERG, an individual; ) ) LAURA DIGGES, an individual; ) ) WILLIAM DIGGES III, an individual; ) ) RICARDO DAVIS, an individual; ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) CIVIL ACTION ) FILE NO.: 2017cv292233 BRIAN P. KEMP, in his individual ) capacity and his official capacity as ) Secretary of State of Georgia and ) Chair of the STATE ELECTION BOARD; ) DEMAND FOR ) JURY TRIAL DAVID J. WORLEY, REBECCA N. ) SULLIVAN, RALPH F. “RUSTY” ) SIMPSON, and SETH HARP, in their ) individual capacities and their official ) capacities as members of the STATE ) ELECTION BOARD; ) ) THE STATE ELECTION BOARD; ) ) RICHARD BARRON, in his individual ) capacity and his official capacity as ) 1 Director of the FULTON COUNTY ) BOARD OF REGISTRATION AND ) ELECTIONS; ) ) MARY CAROLE COONEY, VERNETTA ) NURIDDIN, DAVID J. BURGE, STAN ) MATARAZZO and AARON JOHNSON ) in their individual capacities and official ) capacities as members of the FULTON ) COUNTY BOARD OF REGISTRATION ) AND ELECTIONS; ) ) THE FULTON COUNTY BOARD OF ) REGISTRATION AND ELECTIONS; ) ) MAXINE DANIELS, in her individual ) capacity and her official capacity as ) Director of VOTER REGISTRATIONS ) AND ELECTIONS FOR DEKALB ) COUNTY; ) ) MICHAEL P. COVENY, ANTHONY ) LEWIS, LEONA PERRY, SAMUEL ) E. TILLMAN, and BAOKY N. VU ) in their individual capacities and official ) capacities as members of the DEKALB ) COUNTY BOARD OF REGISTRATIONS ) AND ELECTIONS; ) ) THE DEKALB COUNTY BOARD OF ) REGISTRATIONS AND ELECTIONS; ) ) JANINE EVELER, in her individual ) capacity and her official capacity as ) Director of the COBB COUNTY ) BOARD OF ELECTIONS AND ) REGISTRATION; ) ) PHIL DANIELL, FRED AIKEN, JOE ) PETTIT, JESSICA BROOKS, and ) 2 DARRYL O.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Superior Court of Fulton County State of Georgia
    IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF FULTON COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA DONNA CURLING, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) CASE NO.: 2017CV290630 vs. ) ) BRIAN P. KEMP, in his official) capacity as Secretary of State) of Georgia, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ______________________________) Transcript of the Motion Hearing before the Honorable Kimberly M. Esmond Adams held on June 7, 2017 at the Justice Center Tower, Courtroom 4-E APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL: For the Plaintiffs: EDWARD KRUGMAN ROBERT McGUIRE Attorneys at Law For the Defendants: JOSIAH HEIDT CRISTINA CORREIA KAYE WOODARD BURWELL BENNETT D. BRYAN DANIEL WHITE Attorneys at Law Kristina Weaver, RPR, CCR-B-1785 185 Central Avenue, S.W. Suite T-1858 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 (404)612-4607 I-N-D-E-X T-O E-X-H-I-B-I-T-S For the Plaintiffs: EXHIBIT TENDERED ADMITTED 2 Email/KSU Report 167 167 6 Felten Affidavit 27 28 10 Certifications 136 136 14 Form 990 157 157 16 Open Records Request Exchanges 162 162 18 Three Member Names of RMF 117 118 26 Data Flow Chart 34 34 27 Components Chart 163 164 For the Defendants: EXHIBIT TENDERED ADMITTED 1 Articles of Incorporation 150 151 2 Advance Voting Numbers 223 224 -2- I-N-D-E-X T-O P-R-O-C-E-E-D-I-N-G-S PAGE EDWARD WILLIAM FELTEN Direct Examination by Mr. McGuire......................... 17 Cross-Examination by Mr. Heidt............................ 72 Redirect Examination by Mr. McGuire....................... 74 Recross-Examination by Mr. Heidt.......................... 74 RICHARD DeMILLO Direct Examination by Mr. McGuire......................... 76 Cross-Examination by Mr. Heidt............................ 94 Cross-Examination by Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Contents U U U
    Contents u u u ACM Awards Reception and Banquet, June 2018 .................................................. 2 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 3 A.M. Turing Award .............................................................................................................. 4 ACM Prize in Computing ................................................................................................. 5 ACM Charles P. “Chuck” Thacker Breakthrough in Computing Award ............. 6 ACM – AAAI Allen Newell Award .................................................................................. 7 Software System Award ................................................................................................... 8 Grace Murray Hopper Award ......................................................................................... 9 Paris Kanellakis Theory and Practice Award ...........................................................10 Karl V. Karlstrom Outstanding Educator Award .....................................................11 Eugene L. Lawler Award for Humanitarian Contributions within Computer Science and Informatics ..........................................................12 Distinguished Service Award .......................................................................................13 ACM Athena Lecturer Award ........................................................................................14 Outstanding Contribution
    [Show full text]
  • Securely Curated BMD Printouts Can
    Case 1:17-cv-02989-AT Document 680-1 Filed 12/16/19 Page 1 of 205 E X H I B I T H Case 1:17-cv-02989-AT Document 680-1 Filed 12/16/19 Page 2 of 205 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) DONNA CURLING, et al. ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) CIVIL ACTION FILE NO.: 1:17-cv- vs. ) 2989-AT ) BRIAN P. KEMP, et al. ) ) Defendant. ) ) ) THIRD SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF PHILIP B. STARK PHILIP B. STARK hereby declares as follows: 1. This statement supplements my declarations of September 9, 2018, September 30, 2018, and October 22, 2019. I stand by everything in the previous declarations. 2. I have read portions of the State Defendants’ Combined Response in Opposition to Curling Plaintiffs’ and Coalition Plaintiffs’ Motions for Preliminary Injunction, dated November 13, 2019 (“Combined Response”). This declaration responds primarily to assertions made in the Combined Response, including the declaration of Juan E. Gilbert, Ph.D., contained therein (“the Gilbert declaration”). AUDITS 3. The most compelling reason for post-election audits is to provide public evidence that the reported outcomes are correct, so that the electorate and the losers’ supporters have reason to trust the results. Audits that cannot provide evidence that outcomes are correct Case 1:17-cv-02989-AT Document 680-1 Filed 12/16/19 Page 3 of 205 are little comfort. A transparent, full hand count of a demonstrably trustworthy paper record of votes can provide such evidence. So can a risk-limiting audit of a demonstrably trustworthy paper record of votes.
    [Show full text]
  • CRA-E White Paper
    CRA-E White Paper Creating Environments for Computational Researcher Education August 9, 2010 Committee Members Andy van Dam, Brown (chair) Jim Foley, Georgia Tech John Guttag, MIT Pat Hanrahan, Stanford Chris Johnson, University of Utah Randy Katz, UC Berkeley Henry Kelly, DOE (formerly FAS) Peter Lee, DARPA and CMU David Shaw, D.E. Shaw Research Acknowledgements Thanks to the CRA-E committee members, who provided lively, provocative, and generative ideas during the four meetings. Thanks to Jeannette Wing, Lynn Andrea Stein, and Ed Fox for detailed and relevant reviews that helped refine and shape the raw material of the report. Thanks to CRA's Andrew Bernat for support, patience, and timely suggestions. Thanks to Rosemary Michelle Simpson, who pulled it all together and uncovered the patterns lurking in the mass of material. COMPUTING RESEARCH ASSOCIATION 1828 L Street, NW Suite 800, Washington, DC 20036-4632 Email: [email protected] Tel: 202-234-2111 Fax: 202-667-1066 URL: http://www.cra.org Copyright 2010 by the Computing Research Association. Permission is granted to reproduce the contents provided that such production is not for profit and credit is given to the source. 8/9/10 2 CRA-E White Paper: Creating Environments for Computational Researcher Education Table of Contents Executive Summary - 5 Introduction - 9 Recommendations - 17 Computationally-Oriented Foundations - 17 1. Introductory Courses - addressing a broad range of student interests - 17 Refactoring Computer Science Curricula - 24 2. Core/Foundation for All Computer Science Graduates - lean core with focus on enduring concepts, techniques, and skills - 25 3. Specialization: Tracks, Threads, and Vectors - flexible approaches to gaining understanding and skills - 34 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Association for Computing Machinery 2 Penn Plaza, Suite 701, New York
    ACM A N W N A N R N D N S Association for Computing Machinery 2 Penn Plaza, Suite 701, New York, NY 10121-0701 USA +1-212-869-7440 www.acm.org Contents N N N ACM Awards Reception and Banquet, June 2017 . .2 Introduction . .3 A.M. Turing Award . .4 ACM Prize in Computing . .5 ACM – AAAI Allen Newell Award . .6 Software System Award . .7 Grace Murray Hopper Award . .8 Paris Kanellakis Theory and Practice Award . .9 Karl V. Karlstrom Outstanding Educator Award . .10 ACM Policy Award . .11 Distinguished Service Award . .12 ACM Athena Lecturer Award . .13 Outstanding Contribution to ACM Award . .14 ACM Presidential Award . .15-17 Doctoral Dissertation Award . .18 ACM Student Research Competition . .19 ACM Fellows . .20 Eugene L. Lawler Award for Humanitarian Contributions within Computer Science and Informatics . .21 ACM Gordon Bell Prize . .21 ACM – IEEE CS Eckert-Mauchly Award . .22 ACM – IEEE CS Ken Kennedy Award . .22 ACM – IEEE CS George Michael HPC Memorial Fellowships . .23 SIAM – ACM Prize in Computational Science and Engineering . .23 ACM – CSTA Cutler-Bell Prize . .24 ACM India Doctoral Dissertation Award . .24 ACM China Doctoral Dissertation Award . .25 ACM China Rising Star Award . .25 IPSJ/ACM Award for Early Career Contributions to Global Research . .25 ACM Special Interest Group Awards . .26-27 2017 ACM Award Subcommittee Chairs . .28 ACM Award Nomination Submission Procedures . .29 2018 ACM Award Subcommittee Chairs and Members . .30-31 Past Recipients . .32-36 ACM Fellows . .37-43 In Memoriam, ACM Fellows . .44 1 ACM Awards Reception & Banquet ACM AWARDS N N N N N N The Westin St.
    [Show full text]
  • Speaker Bios
    HEALTHCARE INNOVATION SYMPOSIUM XXIX THE EVOLVING FUTURE OF MEDICAL EDUCATION Mark Tykocinski, MD Provost and Executive Vice President for Academic Affairs The Anthony F. and Gertrude M. DePalma Dean Sidney Kimmel Medical College Thomas Jefferson University Monday, December 2, 2019 12:00-2:00 pm Emory University School of Medicine HEALTHCARE INNOVATION SYMPOSIUM 29 The Evolving Future of Medical Education Monday, December 2, 2019 12:00 – 2:00 pm School of Medicine Auditorium 110, Emory University 12:00 – 12:05 pm: Welcome, Introductions Fred Sanfilippo, MD, PhD Director, Emory-Georgia Tech Healthcare Innovation Program Professor, School of Medicine and Rollins School of Public Health Emory University 12:05 – 12:45 pm: Keynote Presentation Mark Tykocinski, MD Provost and Executive Vice President for Academic Affairs Anthony F. and Gertrude M. DePalma Dean Sidney Kimmel Medical College Thomas Jefferson University 12:45 – 1:30 pm: Panel Presentations J. William Eley, MD, MPH Executive Associate Dean Office of Medical Education and Student Affairs Professor, Hematology/Medical Oncology Emory University School of Medicine Martha L. Elks, MD, PHD Professor of Medical Education Senior Associate Dean of Educational Affairs Morehouse School of Medicine Michael Eriksen, SCD, SCM Interim Vice President for Research and Economic Development Regents’ Professor Founding Dean of the School of Public Health Georgia State University Richard DeMillo, PHD Executive Director Center for 21st Century Universities (C21U) Charlotte B. and Roger C. Warren Chair of Computer Science Professor of Management Georgia Institute of Technology 1:30 – 2:00 pm: Open Discussion Q&A MARK TYKOCINSKI, MD Provost and EVP for Academic Affairs Thomas Jefferson University Mark Tykocinski, MD, joined Thomas Jefferson University in December 2008 and over the ensuing decade has served there in several leadership capacities.
    [Show full text]
  • April 9, 2020 Dear Governors, Secretaries of State and State Election Directors, in Light of the Unprecedented Challenge to Amer
    April 9, 2020 Dear Governors, Secretaries of State and State Election Directors, In light of the unprecedented challenge to American elections presented by the COVID-19 pandemic, we are writing to share information on the scientific evidence regarding the security of internet voting. Internet voting is not a secure solution for voting in the United States, nor will it be in the foreseeable future. We urge you to refrain from allowing the use of any internet or voting app system and consider expanding access to voting by mail and early voting to maintain the security, accuracy, and voter protections essential for American elections in the face of this public health crisis. As you know, there is little time to spare to assure full, fair and timely elections across the United States in November of 2020. We make this request -- with full knowledge of the profound challenges you face to assure all Americans’ ability to vote in a time of pandemic -- for the reasons documented in the attached letter prepared by the American Association for the Advancement of Science Center for Scientific Evidence in Public Issues and endorsed by leading organizations and experts in cybersecurity and computing. In sum, those reasons are: • All internet voting systems and technologies are currently inherently insecure. • No technical evidence exists that any internet voting technology is safe or can be made so in the foreseeable future; rather, all research performed to date demonstrates the opposite. • No blockchain technology can mitigate the profound dangers inherent in internet voting. • No mobile voting app is sufficiently secure to permit its use.
    [Show full text]