Racecadotril (Hidrasec) for Acute Diarrhoea June 2012
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
FDA Warns About an Increased Risk of Serious Pancreatitis with Irritable Bowel Drug Viberzi (Eluxadoline) in Patients Without a Gallbladder
FDA warns about an increased risk of serious pancreatitis with irritable bowel drug Viberzi (eluxadoline) in patients without a gallbladder Safety Announcement [03-15-2017] The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is warning that Viberzi (eluxadoline), a medicine used to treat irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea (IBS-D), should not be used in patients who do not have a gallbladder. An FDA review found these patients have an increased risk of developing serious pancreatitis that could result in hospitalization or death. Pancreatitis may be caused by spasm of a certain digestive system muscle in the small intestine. As a result, we are working with the Viberzi manufacturer, Allergan, to address these safety concerns. Patients should talk to your health care professional about how to control your symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea (IBS-D), particularly if you do not have a gallbladder. The gallbladder is an organ that stores bile, one of the body’s digestive juices that helps in the digestion of fat. Stop taking Viberzi right away and get emergency medical care if you develop new or worsening stomach-area or abdomen pain, or pain in the upper right side of your stomach-area or abdomen that may move to your back or shoulder. This pain may occur with nausea and vomiting. These may be symptoms of pancreatitis, an inflammation of the pancreas, an organ important in digestion; or spasm of the sphincter of Oddi, a muscular valve in the small intestine that controls the flow of digestive juices to the gut. Health care professionals should not prescribe Viberzi in patients who do not have a gallbladder and should consider alternative treatment options in these patients. -
EMC 19 Part 2
Episode 19 part 2 – Pediatric Abdominal Pain Prepared by Dr. Lucas Chartier GASTROENTERITIS • Common diagnosis but may hide sinister pathology, so consider it a diagnosis of exclusion • In cases of isolated vomiting, especially if prolonged, consider alternate diagnoses: intracranial mass, meningitis, strep throat, pneumonia, myocarditis, appendicitis, UTI etc. History: Sick contacts (siblings, day care, travel or relatives visiting from abroad), contact with farm-products (eg, unpasteurized milk), unclean water exposure, prior episodes (if chronic or recurrent, might need out- patient work-up r/o IBD), new animals or foods Physical examination: Dehydration: Highly sensitive but non-specific, with clinicians poor at differentiating the different degrees of severity and usually over-estimating dehydration leading to over-aggressive resuscitation Only 3 findings have significant LR+: prolonged cap refill, abnormal skin turgor, tachypnea Classification: 1. NO OR MILD DEHYDRATION: None of the features below 2. SOME DEHYDRATION: Some components of - unwell general appearance (eg, fussy, leathargic), mucous membranes dry, absence of tears, sunken eyes, prolonged capillary refill, abnormal skin turgor and tachypnea –PO rehydration indicated (safer than IV) 3. SEVERE DEHYDRATION: Most or all of the above features, with abnormal vital signs –IV or NG rehydration indicated Investigations: Majority of children do NOT need investigations, except for: accucheck if lethargy for hypoglycemia secondary to poor oral intake); to rule out other diagnoses -
Réglementation De La Pharmacie
R E C U E I L D E T E X T E S S U R L A P H A R M A C I E Mis à jour le 13 février 2017 par l’Inspection de la pharmacie P R É A M B U L E La réglementation relative à la pharmacie en vigueur en Nouvelle-Calédonie résulte de la coexistence des dispositions adoptées par la Nouvelle-Calédonie au titre de ses compétences en matières d’hygiène publique, de santé et de professions de la pharmacie1, et de celles adoptées par l’Etat au titre de ses compétences en matières de garanties des libertés publiques, de droit civil et de droit commercial2. Sur le contenu du recueil En 1954, la Nouvelle-Calédonie s’est vue étendre les articles L. 511 à L. 520 et L. 549 à L. 665 de l’ancien Livre V relatif à la Pharmacie du code de la santé publique métropolitain par la loi n° 54-418 du 15 avril 1954 étendant aux territoires d'outre-mer, au Togo et au Cameroun certaines dispositions du Code de la santé publique relatives à l'exercice de la pharmacie3, dont les modalités d’application ont été fixées par le décret modifié n° 55-1122 du 16 août 1955 fixant les modalités d'application de la loi n° 54-418 du 15 avril 1954 étendant aux territoires d'outre-mer, au Togo et au Cameroun certaines dispositions du code de la santé publique relatives à l'exercice de la pharmacie4. Depuis sont intervenues la loi- cadre Defferre5, la loi référendaire de 19886 et la loi organique n° 99-209 du 19 mars 1999 dont les apports ont eu pour résultat le transfert de ces articles de la compétence de l’Etat à la compétence de la Nouvelle-Calédonie, permettant à celle-ci de s’en approprier et de les modifier à sa guise par des délibérations du congrès de la Nouvelle-Calédonie7. -
THE USE of ORAL REHYDRATION THERAPY (ORT) in the Emergency Department
Best Practices Series Division of Pediatric Clinical Practice Guidelines Emergency Medicine BC Children’s Hospital Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine Clinical Practice Guidelines GASTROENTERITIS SYMPTOMS CAUSING MILD TO MODERATE DEHYDRATION: THE USE OF ORAL REHYDRATION THERAPY (ORT) in the Emergency Department AUTHORS: Quynh Doan, MD CM MHSC FRCPC Division of Emergency Medicine B.C. Children’s Hospital 4480 Oak Street Vancouver, BC V6H 3V4 [email protected] DIVISION OF PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE: Ran D. Goldman, MD Division Head and Medical Director Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine BC Children’s Hospital [email protected] CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE TASK FORCE: CHAIRMAN: MEMBERS: Paul Korn. MD FRCP(C) TBD Clinical Associate Professor Head, Division, General Pediatrics Department of Pediatrics, UBC [email protected] CREATED: September, 2007 LAST UPDATED: September 28, 2007 FIGURES: 1 File printed Nov4-08/as Clinical Practice Guidelines Gastroenteritis Symptoms Causing Mild to Moderate Dehydration: The Use of Oral Rehydration Therapy (ORT) BACKGROUND Acute gastroenteritis is one of the most common illness affecting infants and children. In developed countries, the average child under 5 years of age experiences 2.2 episodes of diarrhea per year; whereas children attending day care centers may have even higher rates of diarrhea. These episodes result in large number of pediatric office and emergency departments (ED) visits. In the US, treatment for dehydration as a result of acute gastroenteritis accounts for an estimated 200,000 hospitalizations and 300 deaths per year, with comparable rates occurring in Canada. (1)Annually, costs of medical and non medical factors related to gastroenteritis in the US are 0.6 to $1.0 billion. -
Drug Name Plate Number Well Location % Inhibition, Screen Axitinib 1 1 20 Gefitinib (ZD1839) 1 2 70 Sorafenib Tosylate 1 3 21 Cr
Drug Name Plate Number Well Location % Inhibition, Screen Axitinib 1 1 20 Gefitinib (ZD1839) 1 2 70 Sorafenib Tosylate 1 3 21 Crizotinib (PF-02341066) 1 4 55 Docetaxel 1 5 98 Anastrozole 1 6 25 Cladribine 1 7 23 Methotrexate 1 8 -187 Letrozole 1 9 65 Entecavir Hydrate 1 10 48 Roxadustat (FG-4592) 1 11 19 Imatinib Mesylate (STI571) 1 12 0 Sunitinib Malate 1 13 34 Vismodegib (GDC-0449) 1 14 64 Paclitaxel 1 15 89 Aprepitant 1 16 94 Decitabine 1 17 -79 Bendamustine HCl 1 18 19 Temozolomide 1 19 -111 Nepafenac 1 20 24 Nintedanib (BIBF 1120) 1 21 -43 Lapatinib (GW-572016) Ditosylate 1 22 88 Temsirolimus (CCI-779, NSC 683864) 1 23 96 Belinostat (PXD101) 1 24 46 Capecitabine 1 25 19 Bicalutamide 1 26 83 Dutasteride 1 27 68 Epirubicin HCl 1 28 -59 Tamoxifen 1 29 30 Rufinamide 1 30 96 Afatinib (BIBW2992) 1 31 -54 Lenalidomide (CC-5013) 1 32 19 Vorinostat (SAHA, MK0683) 1 33 38 Rucaparib (AG-014699,PF-01367338) phosphate1 34 14 Lenvatinib (E7080) 1 35 80 Fulvestrant 1 36 76 Melatonin 1 37 15 Etoposide 1 38 -69 Vincristine sulfate 1 39 61 Posaconazole 1 40 97 Bortezomib (PS-341) 1 41 71 Panobinostat (LBH589) 1 42 41 Entinostat (MS-275) 1 43 26 Cabozantinib (XL184, BMS-907351) 1 44 79 Valproic acid sodium salt (Sodium valproate) 1 45 7 Raltitrexed 1 46 39 Bisoprolol fumarate 1 47 -23 Raloxifene HCl 1 48 97 Agomelatine 1 49 35 Prasugrel 1 50 -24 Bosutinib (SKI-606) 1 51 85 Nilotinib (AMN-107) 1 52 99 Enzastaurin (LY317615) 1 53 -12 Everolimus (RAD001) 1 54 94 Regorafenib (BAY 73-4506) 1 55 24 Thalidomide 1 56 40 Tivozanib (AV-951) 1 57 86 Fludarabine -
Assessment and Management of INFECTIOUS GASTROENTERITIS
www.bpac.org.nz keyword: gastroenteritis Assessment and management of INFECTIOUS GASTROENTERITIS Key concepts: ■ The majority of infectious gastroenteritis is self- limiting and most people manage their illness themselves in their homes and do not seek medical attention ■ The key clinical issue is the prevention of dehydration ■ Laboratory investigations are not routinely required for most people ■ In the majority of cases, empirical use of antibiotics is not indicated 10 | BPJ | Issue 25 Spring and summer bring warmer weather, relaxed outdoor eating, camping and an increase in cases of Acute complications from infectious food associated illness. Every year about 200,000 New gastroenteritis Zealanders acquire a food associated illness and rates are ▪ Dehydration and electrolyte disturbance higher than in other developed countries.1 ▪ Reduced absorption of medications taken for other conditions (including oral Gastrointestinal diseases account for the majority of all contraceptives, warfarin, anticonvulsants disease notifications in New Zealand, however notified and diabetic medications) cases are only the tip of the iceberg. Most cases of acute gastrointestinal illness (from any cause) are self ▪ Reactive complications e.g. arthritis, limiting and only a proportion of people require a visit to carditis, urticaria, conjunctivitis and a GP. Complications occur in a small number of cases erythema nodosum (see sidebar). People who are at extremes of age, have ▪ Haemolytic uraemic syndrome (acute co-morbidities or who are immunocompromised are renal failure, haemolytic anaemia and especially at risk. thrombocytopenia) Causes of infectious gastroenteritis Causes of infectious gastroenteritis in New Zealand are listed in Table 1. Campylobacter is the most frequently identified pathogen followed by Salmonella and Giardia. -
A 0.70% E 0.80% Is 0.90%
US 20080317666A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2008/0317666 A1 Fattal et al. (43) Pub. Date: Dec. 25, 2008 (54) COLONIC DELIVERY OF ACTIVE AGENTS Publication Classification (51) Int. Cl. (76) Inventors: Elias Fattal, Paris (FR); Antoine A6IR 9/00 (2006.01) Andremont, Malakoff (FR); A61R 49/00 (2006.01) Patrick Couvreur, A6II 5L/12 (2006.01) Villebon-sur-Yvette (FR); Sandrine A6IPI/00 (2006.01) Bourgeois, Lyon (FR) (52) U.S. Cl. .......................... 424/1.11; 424/423; 424/9.1 (57) ABSTRACT Correspondence Address: Drug delivery devices that are orally administered, and that David S. Bradlin release active ingredients in the colon, are disclosed. In one Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice embodiment, the active ingredients are those that inactivate P.O.BOX 7037 antibiotics, such as macrollides, quinolones and beta-lactam Atlanta, GA 30359-0037 (US) containing antibiotics. One example of a Suitable active agent is an enzyme Such as beta-lactamases. In another embodi ment, the active agents are those that specifically treat colonic (21) Appl. No.: 11/628,832 disorders, such as Chrohn's Disease, irritable bowel syn drome, ulcerative colitis, colorectal cancer or constipation. (22) PCT Filed: Feb. 9, 2006 The drug delivery devices are in the form of beads of pectin, crosslinked with calcium and reticulated with polyethylene imine. The high crosslink density of the polyethyleneimine is (86). PCT No.: PCT/GBO6/OO448 believed to stabilize the pectin beads for a sufficient amount of time such that a Substantial amount of the active ingredi S371 (c)(1), ents can be administered directly to the colon. -
Racecadotril in the Treatment of Acute Diarrhea in Children
Eberlin et al. BMC Pediatrics (2018) 18:124 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-018-1095-x RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Racecadotril in the treatment of acute diarrhea in children: a systematic, comprehensive review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Marion Eberlin1, Min Chen2, Tobias Mueck1 and Jan Däbritz3,4* Abstract Background: Racecadotril is a guideline-recommended option for the treatment of acute diarrhea in children but existing guidelines and previous reviews of the field are based on a small fraction of published evidence. Therefore, we have performed a systematic search for randomized controlled trials evaluating racecadotril as add-on or in comparison to other treatments. Methods: A search was performed in PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar without limits about country of origin or reporting language. A meta-analysis was conducted for the five most frequently used efficacy parameters. Results: We have retrieved 58 trials, from nine countries including six in comparison to placebo, 15 in comparison to various active treatments and 41 as add-on to various standard treatments (some multi-armed studies allowing more than one comparison). Trials used 45 distinct efficacy parameters, most often time to cure, % of cured children after 3 days of treatment, global efficacy and number of stools on second day of treatment. Racecadotril was superior to comparator treatments in outpatients and hospitalized patients with a high degree of consistency as confirmed by meta-analysis for the five most frequently used outcome parameters. For instance, it reduced time to cure from 106.2 h to 78.2 h (mean reduction 28.0 h; P < 0.0001 in 24 studies reporting on this parameter). -
A D O L E S C E N
92739 285-299 23/05/06 16:27 Page 285 VOLUME 26 २ NUMERO 5 MAI 2006 २ CAHIER 2 ADOLESCENCE La diarrhée du nourrisson. De la toxicose à la gastroentérite aiguë : une vieille histoire २ La diarrhée aiguë : un symptôme piège ? २ Diarrhée aiguë du nourrisson : critères de gravité २ Diarrhée aiguë du jeune enfant : quelle mortalité aujourd’hui en France ? २ Le syndrome hémolytique et urémique : toujours l’avoir à l’esprit २ La diarrhée aiguë en crèche : prévention, éviction २ Vaccination antirotavirus: des développements attendus २ Soluté de réhydratation orale : du concept à la commercialisation २ Les conseils à l’officine २ Faut-il bouder le régime antidiarrhéique ? २ Les médicaments antidiarrhéiques २ Antibiotiques et diarrhée aiguë en zone tempérée २ Diarrhée du retour : une entité spécifique ? २ Une campagne régionale d’information et d’éducation des familles २ Doit-on actualiser nos recommandations ? e ISSN 0291-0233 Compte rendu de la 4 Journée du groupe de pédiatrie générale de la Société française de pédiatrie. 92739 285-299 19/05/06 18:57 Page 286 Cahier 2, volume 26, numéro 5, de Médecine & enfance, revue mensuelle répertoriée dans la banque de données CNRS/PASCAL de l’INIST, éditée par Edition et communication médicales, membre du Syndicat national de la presse médicale et des professions de santé. SARL au capital de 7622,45 euros. 23, rue Saint-Ferdinand, 75017 Paris. Tél. : 01.45.74.44.65. Fax : 01.40.55.94.13. RC Paris B 321 539 447. Revue hors commerce, réservée exclusivement au corps médical. Copyright Edition et communication médicales 2006. -
1This Action Arises Under the Patent Laws of the United States. See 35 U.S.C
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MCNEIL-PPC, INC., : Plaintiff, : CIVIL ACTION : v. : : L. PERRIGO COMPANY, : and PERRIGO COMPANY, : No. 01-1100 Defendants. : OPINION AND ORDER SCHILLER, J. June , 2002 This is a patent infringement action. Plaintiff McNeil-PPC, Inc. (“McNeil”) alleges Defendants L. Perrigo Company and Perrigo Company (collectively “Perrigo”) infringe four McNeil patents covering a popular version of the Imodium® Advanced antidiarrheal. In a Memorandum and Order issued April 3, 2002, I construed certain disputed claim terms pursuant to Markman v. Westview Instruments, Inc. , 517 U.S. 370 (1996). Beginning April 22, 2002, this matter was tried without a jury, and I enter the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law as required by Rule 52(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 1 FINDINGS OF FACT I. BACKGROUND This action pits a manufacturer of national brand pharmaceuticals against its competitor, a generic drug manufacturer. Four patents owned by Plaintiff McNeil are at issue in this case: United States Patents 5,248,505 (“the ’505 patent”)(PTX1) and 5,612,054 (“the ’054 patent”)(PTX2) are 1This action arises under the patent laws of the United States. See 35 U.S.C. § 271(e)(2) and 21 U.S.C. § 355(j). Jurisdiction is based on 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338(a). Venue is proper in this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(c) and 1400(b). referred to as “the Garwin patents”; 2 United States Patents 5,679,376 (“the ’376 patent”)(PTX3) and 5,716,641 (“the ’641 patent”)(PTX4) are referred to as “the Stevens patents.” A. -
World Journal of Pharmaceutical Research Yashasvi Et Al
World Journal of Pharmaceutical Research Yashasvi et al . World Journal of Pharmaceutical SJIF Research Impact Factor 6.805 Volume 6, Issue 1, 998-1004. Research Article ISSN 2277– 7105 EFFICACY OF RACECADOTRIL COMPARED TO DIPHENOXYLATE IN ACUTE RADIATION ENTERITIS Dr. Yashasvi Suvarna*, Dr. Janaki M. G. and Dr. M. C. Shivamurthy Departments of Pharmacology and Radiation Oncology, M S Ramaiah Medical College and Hospitals, Bangalore. ABSTRACT Article Received on 08 Nov. 2016, Introduction: Radiation enteritis is one of the most common and Revised on 28 Nov. 2016, distressing complications of pelvic radiation. There are limited studies Accepted on 18 Dec. 2016 DOI: 10.20959/wjpr20171-7629 that have assessed the efficacy of antidiarrhoeals in radiation enteritis. This study was done to assess the efficacy of racecadotril versus diphenoxylate in acute radiation enteritis. Methods: This was a *Corresponding Author Dr. Yashasvi Suvarna prospective open label randomized study.50 patients were recruited Departments of into the study with 25 patients in each group. They received either Tab. Pharmacology and Racecadotril 100mg tid for 3 days or Tab. Diphenoxylate Radiation Oncology, M S Hydrochloride 2.5 mg(+ atropine 0.025 mg) tid for 3 days as an add on Ramaiah Medical College and Hospitals, Bangalore. to fluid supplementation. Results: The grade of radiation enteritis in both the groups were similar after 3 days of treatment with the drug (p=0.210).Only one patient in the racecadotril group required cessation of pelvic radiation due to hypokalemia. Conclusion: Racecadotril and diphenoxylate are both effective in treating radiation enteritis and are well tolerated. Further studies with racecadotril are warranted. -
The Private Sector Market for Diarrhea Treatment in India
The Private Sector Market for Diarrhea Treatment in India April 2012 Clinton Health Access Initiative New Delhi, India Table of Contents Abbreviations ..........................................................................................................................................................................3 Acknowledgments..................................................................................................................................................................4 Executive Summary ..............................................................................................................................................................5 Context .......................................................................................................................................................................................8 Methodology ............................................................................................................................................................................9 Diarrhea Treatment Private Sector Supply Chain.................................................................................................... 11 Regulatory Environment .................................................................................................................................................. 16 Manufacturing .....................................................................................................................................................................