DOCSLIB.ORG

At the University of Edinburgh

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
At the University of Edinburgh This thesis has been submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for a postgraduate degree (e.g. PhD, MPhil, DClinPsychol) at the University of Edinburgh. Please note the following terms and conditions of use: • This work is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights, which are retained by the thesis author, unless otherwise stated. • A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. • This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author. • The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author. • When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given. THE PHYSICAL ELEMENT OF POSSESSION OF CORPOREAL MOVEABLE PROPERTY IN SCOTS LAW CRAIG ANDERSON Submitted for the degree of Ph.D. The University of Edinburgh 2014 1 ABSTRACT Possession is a legal concept applying in a variety of legal contexts. In Scottish legal literature, however, there is little in-depth writing on the law of possession, and much of the law is uncertain. This thesis is intended to be a contribution to remedying this deficiency as far as one aspect of the law of possession is concerned, the physical element of possession of corporeal moveable property. As part of this, in the hope that this comparative and historical consideration would shed some light on the issues raised, the law of Rome is considered, along with the law of France, Germany and South Africa, as examples of the Civil Law tradition of legal systems drawing on Roman law. English law is also considered. The thesis is thus able to draw on both of the major traditions influencing the development of Scots law, namely the Civil Law and the Common Law. In this way, the thesis is able to consider the extent to which the Scots law on possession has been influenced by these two traditions. The thesis begins giving an outline of the law of possession and the place of the physical element within it. The remainder of the thesis considers in detail the physical element and its role in both the acquisition and the loss of possession of corporeal moveable property. One of the difficulties with this is that many different areas of law use a concept called 'possession', and views differ as to the extent to which it is appropriate to talk of a general concept of possession. It is argued in the thesis that a general test can be developed for the physical element of possession, based on control of the property in a manner consistent with the assertion of a right to the property. This test is then developed through consideration of how it applies in a number of specific factual contexts. 2 I declare: (a) that this thesis has been composed by me; (b) that the work is my own; and (c) that the work has not been submitted for any other degree or professional qualification. ............................................... Craig Anderson 3 CONTENTS Acknowledgements 11 Abbreviations 12 Foreword 22 1 The meaning of possession 26 2 Historical and comparative approaches 57 3 Acquisition of possession 84 4 Loss of possession 138 5 Momentary control 154 6 Acquisition of possession through symbolical acts 175 7 Possession of animals 205 8 Conclusions 268 Bibliography 271 4 CONTENTS Acknowledgements 11 Abbreviations 12 Foreword 22 1 The meaning of possession 26 A. What is possession? 26 (1) Possession and ownership 26 (a) The Civilian tradition 26 (b) The Common Law tradition 27 (2) Possession and the right to possess 29 (3) The elements of possession 29 (a) Animus 30 (b) Corpus 31 (c) Relationship between corpus and animus 32 (d) Natural and civil possession 33 (4) Summary of requirements for possession 35 B. Is possession a unitary concept? 36 (1) Common Law concerns 36 (2) The Scots position 40 (3) Three difficult areas 45 (a) Pure economic loss 45 (b) Statutory offences 46 (c) Delivery 48 (4) Conclusion 55 2 Historical and comparative approaches 57 A. Introduction 57 B. The physical element in the acquisition of possession 57 5 (1) Roman law 57 (2) The French tradition 60 (a) Pre-codification 60 (b) Modern law 61 (3) Roman-Dutch and South African law 64 (4) Germany 67 (a) Pre-codification 67 (b) Modern law 68 (5) English law 70 (a) The general position 70 (b) Exclusivity 72 (c) Items on another's land 73 C. The physical element in the loss of possession 76 (1) Roman law 76 (2) The French tradition 77 (3) Roman-Dutch and South African law 78 (4) Germany 79 (5) English law 81 D. Conclusions 82 3 Acquisition of possession 84 A. Introduction 84 B. Institutional and other early writings 86 C. Later views 91 D. Control 93 (1) The need to take control 93 (2) Deprivation of another's control 97 (3) Items in buildings and on land 99 (a) Items in buildings and on land generally 99 (b) Buildings and land with limited access 100 (4) Criminal law 104 (5) Level of control required 107 6 (6) Conclusion 110 E. Susceptibility to control 111 (1) Large or unwieldy items 112 (2) Very small items 114 (3) Lack of necessary components 117 (4) External factors 119 (5) Items in the body 120 (6) Conclusions 122 F. Exclusivity 122 (1) The need for exclusivity 122 (2) Potential interference 123 (a) Potential interference generally 123 (b) Traditio clavium 124 (3) Actual interference with consent or right 127 (a) The general issue 127 (b) Shared possession 128 (c) Multiple users 131 (4) Actual interference without consent or right 132 (5) Conclusion 133 G. Conclusions 134 4 Loss of possession 138 A. Introduction 138 B. The potentially relevant factors 139 (1) Absence 139 (2) Ability to resume control where there is an obstacle to control of the thing itself 143 (3) Ability to resume control where the possessor is under some restraint 147 (4) Likelihood of interference 149 C. Conclusions 153 7 5 Momentary control 154 A. Introduction 154 B. Delivery 156 C. Criminal law 161 (1) Introduction 161 (2) Scottish cases concerning statutory offences 162 (3) Non-Scottish cases concerning statutory offences 163 (4) Reset 166 D. Popov v Hayashi 167 (1) Introduction 167 (2) Facts of the case 167 (3) The decision 168 (4) Popov and Scots law 170 E. Conclusion 173 6 Acquisition of possession through symbolical acts 175 A. Introduction: the scope of the chapter 175 B. Exclusions from the scope of the present chapter 177 (1) Delivery of keys 178 (2) Bills of lading 181 (3) Ships 184 (4) The Factors Acts 185 C. Historical and comparative approaches 186 D. Institutional and other early writings 188 E. Case law 190 (1) Rejection of symbolical acquisition of possession 191 (a) Possession by giving of sample 192 (b) Possession by marking item 192 (c) Possession by writing 193 (2) Cases apparently allowing symbolical acquisition of possession 197 (a) Possession by giving of sample 197 8 (b) Possession by marking 198 (c) Possession by writing 202 F. Conclusion 203 7 Possession of animals 205 A. Introduction 205 (1) Significance of possession of animals 205 (2) Occupatio 205 (3) Other applications of possession of animals 205 (4) Methods of possessing animals 206 B. Possession by physical restraint 206 (1) Historical and comparative approaches 206 (a) Roman law 206 (b) France 210 (c) Roman-Dutch law 212 (d) Germany 213 (e) England 217 (2) Scotland 218 (a) Institutional and other early writings 218 (b) Statutory intervention 221 (c) Modern consideration 222 (3) Discussion and conclusions 225 C. Possession through habit of returning 226 (1) Historical and comparative approaches 227 (a) Roman law 227 (b) France 228 (c) Roman-Dutch law 228 (d) Germany 229 (e) England 229 (2) Scotland 230 (3) Discussion and conclusions 230 D. Possession through distinctive markings 231 9 (1) Historical and comparative approaches 231 (a) Roman law 231 (b) France 232 (c) Roman-Dutch law 232 (d) Germany 233 (e) England 233 (2) Scotland 233 (3) Conclusions 237 E. Possession by pursuit 238 (1) Historical and comparative approaches 240 (a) Roman law 240 (b) France 242 (c) Roman-Dutch law 244 (d) Germany 246 (e) England 247 (2) Scotland 249 (a) Institutional and other early writings 249 (b) Adam Smith and exclusive privilege 252 (c) Whales 255 (d) Legislative intervention 257 (e) Acquisition of possession by pursuit 258 (f) Retention of possession by pursuit 262 (3) Discussion and conclusions 264 F. Conclusions 267 8 Conclusions 268 Bibliography 271 10 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I acknowledge first the assistance of my supervisors Dr Andrew Steven, and subsequently Professor George Gretton, and Scott Wortley. This thesis owes a great deal to their guidance and support. I am grateful also for the financial support generously provided by the Edinburgh Legal Education Trust and by my employer, Robert Gordon University, without which I could not have reached this point. The writing of this thesis would not have been possible at all without the constant support of my wife, Katherine. This thesis is dedicated to her, and to our children, Alexander, Lucy, Charlotte, Harriet and Robert. 11 ABBREVIATIONS Baker, Legal History Baker J H, An Introduction to English Legal History (4th edn, Oxford University Press 2007) Balfour, Practicks Balfour J, The Practicks of Sir James Balfour of Pittendreich (McNeill P G B (ed), Stair Society vols 21-22, 1962-1963) Bankton, Inst. M'Douall A, Lord Bankton, An Institute of the Laws of Scotland in Civil Rights: With Observations upon the Agreement or Diversity Between Them and the Laws
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Property Law: the Unsung Hero of North Sea Oil and Gas Author: Demetris Hadjiosif and Constantinos Yiallourides Source: the King’S Student Law Review, Vol
    The King’s Student Law Review Title: Property Law: The Unsung Hero of North Sea Oil and Gas Author: Demetris Hadjiosif and Constantinos Yiallourides Source: The King’s Student Law Review, Vol. 5, No. 2 (Winter 2014), pp. 52-66 Published by: King’s College London on behalf of The King’s Student Law Review All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, recording or otherwise, or stored in any retrieval system of any nature, without the prior, express written permission of the King’s Student Law Review. Within the UK, exceptions are allowed in respect of any fair dealing for the purpose of research of private study, or criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyrights, Designs and Patents Act,1988. Enquiries concerning reproducing outside these terms and in other countries should be sent to the Editor in Chief. KSLR is an independent, not-for-profit, online academic publication managed by students of the King’s College London School of Law. The Review seeks to publish high-quality legal scholarship written by undergraduate and graduate students at King’s and other leading law schools across the globe. For more information about KSLR, please visit our website: http://www.kcl.ac.uk/law/about/review.aspx ©King’s Student Law Review 2014 PROPERTY LAW: THE UNSUNG HERO OF NORTH SEA OIL AND GAS Demetris Hadjiosif and Constantinos Yiallourides* The present paper examines the key property law-related issues pertaining to the development of subsea mineral resources on the United Kingdom Continental Shelf: from their initial ‘capture’ (acquisition of ownership) to their transportation to downstream facilities via onshore pipelines.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Prescription and Title to Moveable Property
    (SCOT LAW COM No 228) Report on Prescription and Title to Moveable Property report Report on Prescription and Title to Moveable Property Laid before the Scottish Parliament by the Scottish Ministers May 2012 Updated to include corrections to pages vi, 44 and 45, May 2012 SCOT LAW COM No 228 SG/2012/77 EDINBURGH: The Stationery Office £16.00 © Crown copyright 2012 You may re-use this information (excluding logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ or email: [email protected]. Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. Any copyright enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at [email protected]. ISBN: 978-0-10-888264-7 Printed in the UK for The Stationery Office Limited on behalf of the Queen’s Printer for Scotland. 05/12 Cover printed on 75% recycled paper Text printed on 100% recycled paper ii The Scottish Law Commission was set up by section 2 of the Law Commissions Act 19651 for the purpose of promoting the reform of the law of Scotland. The Commissioners2 are: Laura J Dunlop, QC Patrick Layden, QC TD Professor Hector L MacQueen Dr Andrew J M Steven. The Chief Executive of the Commission is Malcolm McMillan. Its offices are at 140 Causewayside, Edinburgh EH9 1PR. Tel: 0131 668 2131 Fax: 0131 662 4900 Email: [email protected] Or via our website at http://www.scotlawcom.gov.uk/contact-us NOTES 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Udal Law: an Introduction
    UDAL LAW: AN INTRODUCTION lane Ryder, W.S. As a lecture delivered to the Scottish Society for Northern Studies, this article represented the writer's first attempts to wrestle with the vexed question of udal law in Orkney and Shetland. A comprehensive account, together with an editorial excursus by the late Sir Thomas Smith, has since been published in The Laws of Scotland: the Stair Memorial Encyclopaedia. 1 What the revised article attempts is a synthesis of the two entries in the Stair Encyclopaedia, in so far as they address issues of historical background, without necessarily examining every aspect of the law. The article also attempts to highlight issues of general interest in the context of modern United Kingdom law. With this in mind, it is useful to examine three distinct periods: the first being the period before the pledging or wadset ofthe islands in 1468-9, the second period from 1468-9 to 1611, and the third, 1611 to date. The period up to 1468-9 The settlement of Orkney and Shetland and the establishment of udal law by Scandinavian settlers was part of the larger population movement of Scandinavian peoples throughout Europe. Earlier writers, including Snorri Sturlason, had interpreted the permanent settlement as a political response to the centralising authority ofHarold Finehair, and in particular to his victory at the battle of Hafrsfjord in 872. This must be modified in light ofrecent research which has redated the battle to some time between the 880s and 9OOs. Moreover recent place-name and archaeological evidence points to settlement by colonists from the west coast ofNorway at an earlier date.
    [Show full text]
  • SCOTLAND 1. Real Property
    UK: SCOTLAND Kenneth G C Reid Professor of Property Law, University of Edinburgh and a Scottish Law Commissioner1 1. Real Property Law – Introduction 1.1 General Features and Short History The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland comprises one state, four countries and three jurisdictions. The jurisdictions are (i) England and Wales (ii) Scotland and (iii) Northern Ireland. Each jurisdiction has its own courts, its own lawyers, and its own law. The state has a common parliament (the House of Commons and House of Lords), a common executive, and a common supreme court (the House of Lords), all based in London. But in recent years there has been administrative and legislative devolution both to Scotland and to Northern Ireland. A separate parliament for Scotland was established in 1999, with power to legislate on most areas of private law.2 The union between Scotland and England took place in 1707.3 Before then the countries were separate states. In the medieval period the laws of Scotland and England had many points in common. In particu- lar the feudal system of land tenure, which reached England with the Norman Conquest in 1066, was introduced to Scotland in the course of the twelfth century. From the sixteenth century onwards, how- ever, there was a substantial reception of Roman law in Scotland (but not, on the whole, in England). In Scotland, as in many other European countries, the jurists of the ius commune were studied, and their writings applied in the courts. National legal education did not begin properly in Scotland until the early eighteenth century, and before that time law students from Scotland often studied in the universities of Europe, at first mainly in France and, after the Reformation, in the Netherlands.
    [Show full text]
  • Black's Law Dictionary®
    BLACK'S LAW DICTIONARY® Definitions of the Terms and Phrases of American and English Jurisprudence, Ancient and Modern By HENRY CAMPBELL BLACK, M. A. SIXTH EDITION BY THE PUBLISHER'S EDITORIAL STAFF Coauthors JOSEPH R. NOLAN Associate Justice, Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court and JACQUELINE M. NOLAN-HALEY Associate Clinical Professor, Fordham University School of Law Contributing Authors M. J. CONNOllY Associate Professor (Linguistics), College of Arts & Sciences, Boston College STEPHEN C. HICKS Professor of Law, Suffolk University Law School, Boston, MA MARTINA N. All BRANDI Certified Public Accountant, Bolton, MA ST. PAUL, MINN. WEST PUBLISHING CO. 1990 "BLACK'S LAW DICTIONARY" is a registered trademark of West Publishing Co. Registered in U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. COPYRIGHT @ 1891, 1910, 1933, 1951, 1957, 1968, 1979 WEST PUBLISHING CO. COPYRIGHT @ 1990 By WEST PUBLISHING CO. 50 West Kellogg Boulevard P.O. Box 64526 St. Paul, Mn 55164-0526 All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Black, Henry Campbell, 1850-1927. [Law dictionary] Black's law dictionary / by Henry Campbell Black. - 6th ed. / by the publisher's editorial staff; contributing authors, Joseph R. Nolan ... let al.] p. cm. ISBN 0-314-76271-X 1. Law-United States-Dictionaries. 2. Law-Dictionaries. I. Nolan, Joseph R. II. Title. KF156.B53 1990 340' .03-dc20 90-36225 CIP ISBN 0-314-76271-X ISBN 0-314-77165-4 deluxe Black's Law Dictionary 6th Ed. 2nd Reprint-1990 PREFACE This new Sixth Edition starts a second century for Black's Law Dictionary-the standard authority for legal definitions since 1891.
    [Show full text]
  • Nova Species
    Nova Species Cornelius van der Merwe I. Introduction In modern law it is generally accepted that one of the require- ments for acquisition of ownership by specification (specificatio) is that a new species (nova species) must be created. I would like to start my examination of what is meant by a nova species by pre- senting an abbreviated version of the facts and decision in the most recent case in Scotland on the issue, Kinloch Damph Ltd. v. Nordvik Salmon Farms Ltd.1 Pursuers sold one and a quarter million smolt (young salmon in embryonic state) to the defenders on credit with reservation of ownership. The defenders placed the smolt in seawater in cages and fed and husbanded them, with the result that they developed from smolts into salmon thirty times their original size. When the defenders went into receivership, the outstanding balance of the price was still over £700,000. The pursuers preferred to rely on their proprietary claim by virtue of their reservation of owner- ship, which was worth more than the undisputed monetary claim.2 The defenders argued inter alia that by virtue of their efforts and material in the form of husbandry and feed, the smolts had ceased to exist as such and that a nova species, the mature salmon, irreducible to their constituent parts, had come into exis- tence. Although they accepted the expert opinion that smolt and salmon are of the same biological species, salmo salar,3 they ar- gued that the physiological changes which smolts undergo in becoming mature salmon (namely, changes affecting the gill and kidney which allow the fish to adapt to changing salinity condi- tions) were sufficient to support the conclusion that an adult salmon is a nova species in the legal sense.
    [Show full text]
  • Corporeal Moveables
    This Memorandum is the introductory volume in a series of Memoranda which are published simultaneously for comment and criticism, and which do not represent the final views of the Scottish Law Commission. The Commission would be grateful if comments were submitted by 31 January 1977. All correspondence should be addressed to: Mr R Black Scottish Law Commission 140 Causewayside EDINBURGH EH9 ?PR (Telephone : 031-668-21 31 ) CONTENTS I. GENIiRAL INTRODUCTION A: Memorandum No 25 Corporeal moveables : passing of risk and of ownership B: Memorandum No 26 Corporeal moveables: some problems of classification l1 C: Memorandum No 27 Corporeal moveables: protection of the onerous bona fide acquirer of another ' S property 7 3 D: Memorandum No. 28 Corporeal moveables : mixing, union and creation E: Memorandum No 29 Corporeal moveables: lost and abandoned property F: Memorandum No 30 Corporeal moveables: usucapion, or acquisitive prescription G: Memorandum No 31 Cbrporeal moveables : remedies lTEHO1iANI)UM NO. 24 CORPOREAL MOVXAULES GENERAL ITJTIIODUCTION MD SUMWIRY OF 1'R OVISIONAL l"IIOpOG~LS I. GB$- INTRODUCTION 1. In terms of section 3(1) of the Law Commissions Act 1965 we have a general duty to examine the law for anomalies and defects; to consider the simplification and modernisation of the law; i~ndto consider proposals for law reform. 2. In the course of our examination of the law of prescription, it was suggested to us that the law on that subject, insofar as it affects corporeal moveables, should be clarified. Prescription is the ultimate determinant of the right of ohership curing all defects of acquisition on onerous or gratuitous title.
    [Show full text]
  • Ex Facie Validity and Hability
    This thesis has been submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for a postgraduate degree (e.g. PhD, MPhil, DClinPsychol) at the University of Edinburgh. Please note the following terms and conditions of use: This work is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights, which are retained by the thesis author, unless otherwise stated. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given. Positive Prescription of Landownership in Scots Law: The Requirement for the written deed, with particular reference to the concepts of ex facie validity and hability Colin Matthew Campbell Presented for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Edinburgh 2014 Table of Contents Table of Contents ........................................................................................................ i Acknowledgements .................................................................................................. viii Declaration ................................................................................................................ ix Abstract .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Spice Briefing Judicial Review 27 October 2009 09/75 Sarah Harvie-Clark
    The Scottish Parliament and Scottish Parliament Information Centre logos. SPICe Briefing Judicial Review 27 October 2009 09/75 Sarah Harvie-Clark Judicial review is a type of court action which allows parties to challenge the exercise of power by UK and Scottish ministers, UK and Scottish government departments and agencies, non- departmental bodies, local authorities and other official decision makers. In certain circumstances judicial review can be used to challenge acts of the UK and Scottish parliaments. It can also be used to challenge subordinate legislation. This briefing provides an introduction to judicial review. It covers topics including who can bring an action for judicial review, what the grounds of judicial review are, and the remedies that can be awarded by the court if an action for judicial review is successful. It also considers recent policy developments relating to judicial review. CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..............................................................................................................................................3 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW.............................................................................................................................5 STATISTICS ON JUDICIAL REVIEW ACTIONS ........................................................................................................5 THE CHANGING FACE OF JUDICIAL REVIEW ........................................................................................................6 IMPACT OF EUROPEAN COMMUNITY LAW .......................................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Nova Species
    Nova Species Cornelius van der Merwe I. Introduction In modern law it is generally accepted that one of the require- ments for acquisition of ownership by specification (specificatio) is that a new species (nova species) must be created. I would like to start my examination of what is meant by a nova species by pre- senting an abbreviated version of the facts and decision in the most recent case in Scotland on the issue, Kinloch Damph Ltd. v. Nordvik Salmon Farms Ltd.1 Pursuers sold one and a quarter million smolt (young salmon in embryonic state) to the defenders on credit with reservation of ownership. The defenders placed the smolt in seawater in cages and fed and husbanded them, with the result that they developed from smolts into salmon thirty times their original size. When the defenders went into receivership, the outstanding balance of the price was still over £700,000. The pursuers preferred to rely on their proprietary claim by virtue of their reservation of owner- ship, which was worth more than the undisputed monetary claim.2 The defenders argued inter alia that by virtue of their efforts and material in the form of husbandry and feed, the smolts had ceased to exist as such and that a nova species, the mature salmon, irreducible to their constituent parts, had come into exis- tence. Although they accepted the expert opinion that smolt and salmon are of the same biological species, salmo salar,3 they ar- gued that the physiological changes which smolts undergo in becoming mature salmon (namely, changes affecting the gill and kidney which allow the fish to adapt to changing salinity condi- tions) were sufficient to support the conclusion that an adult salmon is a nova species in the legal sense.
    [Show full text]
  • Pledge and Lien STUDIES in SCOTS LAW
    Pledge and Lien STUDIES IN SCOTS LAW Series Editor Kenneth G C Reid Editorial Board Alan R Barr Sandra M Eden George L Gretton Previous volumes in the Series 1. Ross Gilbert Anderson, Assignation (2008) STUDIES IN SCOTS LAW VOLUME 2 Pledge and Lien Andrew J M Steven Lecturer in Law, University of Edinburgh EDINBURGH LEGAL EDUCATION TRUST 2008 Published by Edinburgh Legal Education Trust School of Law University of Edinburgh Old College South Bridge Edinburgh EH8 9YL First published 2008 © A J M Steven 2008 The author asserts his moral rights. ISBN 978-0-9556332-1-8 British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the written permission of the copyright owner. Applications for the copyright owner’s permission to reproduce any part of this publication should be addressed to the publisher. Typeset by Etica Press Ltd, Malvern Printed and bound by Bell & Bain Ltd, Glasgow Contents Preface vii Table of Cases ix Table of Statutes xxiii Table of Statutory Instruments xxvii Abbreviations xxix 1 General 1 2 Pledge: Introduction 5 3 History of Pledge 15 4 Pledge: The Obligation Secured 45 5 Subject Matter of Pledge 57 6 Constitution of Pledge 63 7 Pledge: Rights and Duties of the Parties 89 8 Enforcement and Extinction of Pledge 95 9 Lien: Introduction 107 10 History of Lien 113 11 Lien: The Obligation Secured 161 12 Subject Matter of Lien 171 13 The Pre-Requisites of Lien 177 14 Lien as a Real Right 195 15 Enforcement and Extinction of Lien 203 16 Special Lien 209 17 General Lien 247 18 Pledge and Lien Compared 281 Index 287 v Preface This book is an updated and restructured version of my doctoral thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Article III and the Scottish Enlightenment James E
    Northwestern University School of Law Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons Faculty Working Papers 2010 Article III and the Scottish Enlightenment James E. Pfander Northwestern University School of Law, [email protected] Repository Citation Pfander, James E., "Article III and the Scottish Enlightenment" (2010). Faculty Working Papers. Paper 105. http://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/facultyworkingpapers/105 This Working Paper is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Working Papers by an authorized administrator of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. ARTICLE III AND THE SCOTTISH ENLIGHTENMENT James E. Pfander* & Daniel D. Birk** 124 HARV. L. REV. __ (forthcoming 2011) ABSTRACT Historically-minded scholars and jurists invariably turn to English law and precedents in attempting to recapture the legal world of the framers. Blackstone’s famous Commentaries on the Laws of England offer a convenient reference for moderns looking backwards. Yet the generation that framed the Constitution often relied on other sources, including Scottish law and legal institutions. Indeed, the Scottish judicial system provided an important, but overlooked, model for the framing of Article III. Unlike the English system of overlapping original jurisdiction, the Scottish judiciary featured a hierarchical, appellate-style judiciary, with one supreme court sitting at the top and an array of inferior courts of original jurisdiction down below. What’s more, the Scottish judiciary operated within a constitutional framework -- the so-called Acts of Union that combined England and Scotland into Great Britain in 1707 -- that protected the role of the supreme court from legislative re-modeling.
    [Show full text]