How Do We Think About Our Craft?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

How Do We Think About Our Craft? How Do We Think about Our Craft? MAXINE GREENE Teachers College, Columbia University To speak of craft is to presume a knowledge of a certain range of skills and proficiencies. It is to imagine an educated capacity to attain a desired end-in- view or to bring about a desired result. Where teachers are concerned, the end- in-view has to do with student learning; the desired result has to do with the “match” between what students have learned and what their teachers believe they have taught. We differ considerably among ourselves, of course, on the ends we actually have in mind and on the degree to which they can be predefined. Some of us focus on measurable competencies; others, on the process of coming to know, or on “knowing how” rather than “knowing that.” Some of us confine our attention to the cognitive domain; others try to cultivate imaginative capacities as well as cognitive ones; still others place equal stress on the affective domain. Many of us are uncertain about how much of our craft we have learned and about how much “comes naturally.” We wonder how much of our understanding can be put into words. How much of what we do is purely habitual and routinized? To what degree are choice and imagination involved? Is there a frame of reference to which most of us refer, what has been called “procedural lore”?1 How often, in any case, do we reflect on what we are doing, given our incessant involvement in the activity of teaching, maintaining order, meeting needs, making plans? To ask how we think about our craft is not to ask what we know about it. Following Hannah Arendt, I would describe thinking as a “soundless dialogue,“2 an internalized dialogue through which (as it were) we talk things over with ourselves. In order to engage in it, we have to “stop and think”; and, inevitably, it interrupts ordinary activities. To proceed unthinkingly is to be caught in the flux of things, to be “caught up” in dailyness, in the sequences of tasks and routines. Of course we have to proceed that way a good deal of the time, but there should be moments when we deliberately try to draw meaning out of particular incidents and experiences. This requires a pause, a conscious effort to shake free of what Virginia Woolf called “the nondescript cotton wool” of daily life.3 She associated such moments of awareness with “moments of being”: and she knew how rare they are in any given day and how necessary for the development of a sense of potency, of vital being in the world. Thinking about our craft often brings conscience to bear on the actions we Volume 86. Number 1. Fall 1984 0161-4681/84/8601/055$1.25/0 56 Teachers College Record undertake in the course of our work. This is not surprising, since the capacity to think about what we are doing involves an attentiveness that overcomes distancing and neutrality. John Dewey once described mind as a way of paying attention, as “care in the sense of solicitude-as well as active looking after things that need to be tended. “4 To take care in this sense is to consider the value of what we are trying to accomplish in our classrooms. It may be to try to justify our interventions in the lives of our students, especially those whose lived experience is markedly different from our own. It may be to reconcile our desires to free them to pursue meanings with our equally strong desires to mold them, to shape them in accord with some mainstream or “middle-class” model of what we conceive to be personhood. How do we argue the worth of separating students from their backgrounds, what we may consider their “enclaves”? How do we justify stimulating and encouraging certain individuals, while providing only minimal support for others? How do we justify provoking some to move beyond where they are, while approv- ing others who just about reach their grade level in the work assigned? To bring conscience to bear is not only to ponder the purposes of what we do, although surely it is that as well. It is not only to ponder the meanings of the “worthwhile” encounters we are expected to make possible for the young.5 It is to take the time for reflectiveness about ourselves and our relation to that segment of the human world in which we do our work. For all the fact that we pursue our projects within what sometimes appear as concentric circles of influence and opinion (the cultures of the school, the school district, the surrounding public, the state and federal governments), we live most of our working lives in particular situations, understood in large part by means of what Clifford Geertz calls “local knowledge.“6 We are persons with identifiable vantage points and modes of being, simply because we engage in the action called teaching; and, although we can hope for some reciprocity between ourselves and persons in different worlds, with different projects, what we do profoundly affects what we see and how we are. Our consciousness of craft (our singular craft) may be most acute, for example, when we are endeavoring to enable students to decode a short story in a way that will release them into new ways of apprehending and, at once, equip them to do justice to fictionality and other literary norms. This is one of multiple occasions of trying to empower young persons to make their own kinds of sense and, at once, live up to standards of “correctness” or efficacy. We need but think of preparing students to devise and test hypotheses in a chemistry laboratory, or to read the historical record in a manner that gives rise to an explanation of some past event. Any person who teaches understands what it means to feel oneself to be an “authority” with respect to what one is trying to teach. For Peters, this means communicating the idea that the teacher is engaged in something worth doing, something exciting having to do with certain spheres of knowledge and skill. Behind them, Peters Thinking about Our Craft 57 writes, “stands the notion that there is a right and a wrong way of doing things, that some things are true and others false, and that it matters desperately what is done and said. “7 Most of us realize, however, that our authority or authoritativeness is likely to be acknowledged by our students only when they need help in becoming, in pursuing what they desire to pursue. “The child,” says Donald Vandenberg, “constitutes the authority of the teacher.“8 When our words open up possibilities for the child, he means, when they are felt to contribute somehow to the child’s ongoing explorations (or inquiries, or investigations), they are accepted as authoritative. Those of us who view ourselves as teachers rather than trainers know in a very particular way that what we offer-and even what we demand-has to connect with student interest and need and concern. Students have, in some sense, to consent to what we are communicating; they have to choose to acknowledge it as somehow relevant to their own sense-making. And then they have to try it out, with all the risk of error that entails, for themselves. “The craft of teaching has a number of aspects,” writes Herbert Kohl. “It relates to the organization of content and the structuring of space and time so that learning will be fostered.“9 He speaks of the need to understandstudents’ levels of sophistication and learning styles; and he associates with “teaching sensibility” a knowledge of how to help diverse students “focus their energy on learning and growth.” This may involve a variety of ways of addressing them, of provoking them to attend to the matter at hand. Where young children are concerned, it may require us to play with, indeed to reorganize our knowledge of the subject matter so as to increase the area of contact between that subject matter and the children’s minds. “And you reorganize it,” David Hawkins once wrote, “according to a different principle than that of textbook. By spreading way out, by making many parts of the logically organized subject matter accessible to the already established means of knowing, and interests and commitments of the learner, you greatly increase the probability and the rate of learning in that subject matter.“10 In the case of older students, we are more likely to stay close to what we believe to be a logical organization of the subject matter, to lay stress on the principles fundamental to the discipline. Here, too, however, there is the possibility of seeking alternative processes for marshaling what Howard Gardner calls “intelligences”11 in the pursuit of educational goals. He has been describing the multiple intelligences or the range of know-hows of which human beings are capable; and it may be that ways can be found, even in the course of initiating students into the same discipline or symbol system, of establishing contact through the activation of different sorts of potential. Most people, of course, come to know the fundamentals of history through the use of linguistic and logical intelligences; but it is at least conceivable that some can be brought to understanding through the exercise of personal or literary or even spatial intelligence. The same may be true of literature or sociology or 58 Teachers College Record even physics. The crucial point is to focus energies in such a fashion that different students, taking different paths, are enabled to learn theappropriate language or notation or symbol system.
Recommended publications
  • The Person and Education MAXINE GREENE Brooklyn College
    The Person And Education MAXINE GREENE Brooklyn College This book is, from one vantage point, a and stable ideals. Nor could he accept the position paper on a philosophic outlook notion that values could be scientifically called "Empirical Personalism." From defined. And as a committed personalist, he another, it is a call for a democratic school could not give up his belief in his engaged in dialogue, staffed by teachers metaphysic, not as a "logically predictive" who are both empiricists and "witnesses"— premise, but "as a reasoned source of and dedicated, above all things, to the inspiration for pursuing values," an "emergence of persons." overarching and unifying principle which could sanction the centrality of man. But Professor Soderquist has also given us his credo here, his fundamental commitment It is apparently for this reason that he turned as teacher and educational philosopher. His to the writings of certain existentialist book, therefore, becomes a kind of log of an philosophers, particularly Kierkegaard, intellectual—or, perhaps, a sentimental— Jaspers, Heidegger, and Marcel. One journey, concluding with the discovery that suspects, in fact, that his need for modernity one can go home again. made him welcome the growing popularity of existentialism (or what he took to be Home, for Harold Soderquist, is the belief existentialism) in the past few decades. called personalism, with its roots in Living professionally among progressives nineteenth-century romantic idealism, its and empiricists, he could not have found it associations with Protestant theologies, its easy to think of himself as "dated," as focus on metaphysics, values, and "the archaic in some way.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum of Imagination Beyond the Walls of Standardization
    Georgia Southern University Digital Commons@Georgia Southern Electronic Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies, Jack N. Averitt College of Fall 2006 Curriculum of Imagination Beyond the Walls of Standardization Robert Lewis Lake Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/etd Recommended Citation Lake, Robert Lewis, "Curriculum of Imagination Beyond the Walls of Standardization" (2006). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 512. https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/etd/512 This dissertation (open access) is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies, Jack N. Averitt College of at Digital Commons@Georgia Southern. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Georgia Southern. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A CURRICULUM OF IMAGINATION BEYOND THE WALLS OF STANDARDIZATION by ROBERT LAKE (Under the Direction of Ming Fang He) ABSTRACT This dissertation is a theoretical inquiry into ways of seeing, knowing, and learning that are frequently excluded in this present climate of standardized practices in the field of education. In this study, I explore how imagination permeates every aspect of life experience and helps develop personal and political awareness in students to look beyond what they take for granted, to question the normal, and to develop various ways of knowing, seeing, feeling, and acting upon positive social and educational change in an era of accountability. This is accomplished by tracing the historical and contemporary evolution of the concepts of imagination and metaphor and, in specific terms, how they make possible the creation of personal meaning and agency. An imaginary dialogue based on actual quotations from Maxine Greene and Paulo Freire serves as the theoretical framework for the inquiry, with the researcher’s commentary interspersed at various points in the conversation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Calm Against the Storm, Or, Levels of Concern, by Maxine Greene
    GREENE The Sixties 307 THE SIXTIES: THE CALM AGAINST THE STORM, OR, LEVELS OF CONCERN Maxine Greene Teachers College Columbia University Striving to avoid presentism, staving off some of my own memories, I turned to Educational Theory in the decade of the “Sixties.” Because of my associations with the unrest of that period, I looked back with considerable expectancy where educational philosophy was concerned. I was sure, somehow, that there would be responses to what seemed to be a variety of philosophical questions inherent in the Civil Rights movement, with its stress upon civil disobedience, nonviolence, and redemptive suffering. There were issues like conscientious objection to a draft occasioned by what seemed to increasing numbers to be an unjust war. It would appear, even from the present vantage point, that appeals to intuition and to the moral law (in tension with rationality and the civil law), while warranted by war or cruel circumstances existing in the South, held implications for the schools. There were the demonstrations, mostly peaceful, some of them not, and odd alliances among those Norman Mailer called “armies of the night.”1 Legislation having to do with educational equality, compensatory education, and sexual equality raised an unprecedented set of problems, some of them linguistic, some arising from genera- tions of discrimination scarcely questioned before. I realize I was looking through lenses partly derived from recollections of participation in the 1963 March on Washington, of taking buses to peace demonstrations, of trying to convince col- leagues to take positions on the war in Vietnam. And, of course, there were the three assassinations that shook our faith in political possibility.
    [Show full text]
  • Download File
    LISTENING FOR SOUNDS OF STRIVING: MAXINE GREENE AND STORIES OF MUSIC TEACHER BECOMINGS Mya Katherine Magnusson Scarlato Submitted in partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Education in Teachers College, Columbia University 2021 © 2021 Mya Katherine Magnusson Scarlato All Rights Reserved Abstract Listening for Sounds of Striving: Maxine Greene and Stories of Music Teacher Becomings Mya Katherine Magnusson Scarlato This phenomenological study explores the lived experiences of three music teachers who are invited to view themselves and their practices as “becoming” in the context of Maxine Greene’s philosophy of education. In communion with my own becoming as teacher and researcher, I explore the aspects of my participants’ musical and teaching identities over the course of their careers and in relation to their unique teaching contexts. Throughout this project, I explored qualities of resonance, striving, a sense of artistic “re-capturing,” wide-awakeness, social imagination, and courage. I came to understand that stories play an important role in shaping our perceptions of reality and awareness of the lived lives of the “other” as we strive together toward a more just society through artistic encounters in education. Table of Contents I. FREQUENCIES OF WHICH I WAS UNAWARE ................................................................ 1 Related Literature .................................................................................................................... 3 Theoretical Framework ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • University of Dundee Freedom, Aesthetics, and the Agôn of Living In
    University of Dundee Freedom, aesthetics, and the agôn of living in Maxine Greene's work Baldacchino, John Published in: Review of Education, Pedagogy and Cultural Studies DOI: 10.1080/10714413.2017.1262153 Publication date: 2017 Licence: Other Document Version Peer reviewed version Link to publication in Discovery Research Portal Citation for published version (APA): Baldacchino, J. (2017). Freedom, aesthetics, and the agôn of living in Maxine Greene's work. Review of Education, Pedagogy and Cultural Studies, 39(1), 18-38. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714413.2017.1262153 General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in Discovery Research Portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from Discovery Research Portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain. • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 02. Oct. 2021 MAXINE’S CHOICE(S) Freedom, aesthetics, and the agôn of living in Maxine Greene’s work John Baldacchino University of Dundee, Scotland Abstract: Maxine Greene argues that to take a position is to make a choice. This choice is concrete, free and active.
    [Show full text]
  • 768 Teachers College Record
    768 Teachers College Record Power over Power David Nyberg. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1981, $14.95. 200 pp. MAXINE GREENE, Teachers College, Columbia University In his “Philosophies of Freedom,” John Dewey laid great stress on the “intrinsic connection between choice as freedom and power of action as freedom.“’ His concern was for the “power of vision and reflection,” the “power-to-do” in relation to the actualization of freedom. David Nyberg may be the first educational thinker to take seriously the notion of power and its relevance, not only for a conceptualization of freedom, but for a philosophy of education as well. He is certainly the first to talk about teaching power and the “skills of freedom.” Disagreeing with Socrates in the Gorgias, Nyberg rejects the idea that a philosophy of power is antithetical to a philosophy of culture or education. If education has in part to do with empowering persons to make life plans for themselves, if it has anything to do with enabling them to act on their projects, it has to “speak to power.” Because power refers to something that comes into being within the context of social relations, because (as Hannah Arendt says) “it corresponds to the human ability not just to act but to act in concert,“* and because one of the fundamental meanings of freedom has to do with action along with and with respect to others, the old polarity of power and freedom probably should be reconceived. Professor Nyberg goes at the problem of reconceptualization as an educational philosopher fundamentally concerned with clarity and, yes, with rationality.
    [Show full text]
  • Passion of Pluralism by Maxine Greene
    TheThe PassionsPassions ofof Pluralism:Pluralism: MulticulturalismMulticulturalism andand thethe ExpandingExpanding CommunityCommunity ByBy MaxineMaxine GreeneGreene MaxineMaxine GreeneGreene BackgroundBackground InformationInformation Has made a career out of lecturinging andand writingwriting aboutabout herher philosophilosophy of education and calls herself a philosopher, inquirer and an artist. She is past President of the American Educational Research Association (AREA), Philosophy of Education Society, American Educational Studies Association (AESA), and the Middle Atlantic States Philosophyilosophy ofof EducationEducation Society.Society. Founder of the Maxine Greene Foundation: Foundation for Social Imagination, the ArtArtss and Education Served as the executive councilil onon thethe JohnJohn DeweyDewey SocietySociety Has made influential strides as a faculty member at Teacher’’s College of Coluibia UniversitUniversityy in New York City. Received her doctorate from NYU in 1955 and went on to teach there, Montclair, and Brooklyn College. Presently, Maxine teachers at Teacher’’s College of Columbia where she is the William F. Russell Professor in the Foundations of Education. DrDr GreeneGreene’’ss MainMain PointsPoints Our nation continues to grow and expand each day with an increase in multiculturalism. As a nation have to come to grips with this and accept it. Every individual plays an important role in our society and the voices of all citizens need to be heard. With America’s increasing cultural diversity, Dr. Greene stresses the need to recognize John Dewey’s philosophy as a “Great Community” ..Main..Main PointsPoints Continued..Continued.. Dr. Greene wishes for people to rediscover or discover for the first time the uniqueness of each person. She feels each individual is unique and he or she has a right to be heard and recognized in the national community.
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of Sartre and Merleau-Ponty on Greene’S Educational Pedagogy Shaireen Rasheed C.W
    394 The Existential Concept of Freedom The Existential Concept of Freedom for Maxine Greene: The Influence of Sartre and Merleau-Ponty on Greene’s Educational Pedagogy Shaireen Rasheed C.W. Post, Long Island University When freedom is the question, it is always time to begin.1 Maxine Greene and Jean-Paul Sartre both believe that it is through the dialectical principle of negativity and freedom that meaning and intelligibility are conferred upon the world in their manifest form. This notion is important throughout Greene’s work, and is particularly important in Dialectic of Freedom, where Greene says about the student that “We must foster the freedom that he/she can attain as she moves dialectically between necessity and fulfillment, between the ineradicable qualities of her particular situation and the thus far unrealized capacities which are hers” (DF, 163). Sartre’s existentialist concept of freedom suggests that morality as a whole is the province of individual self-determination, and the social dimension of morality and relationships with others comes in simply as one element in the design of an individual life. Sartre’s focus on individuality is particularly acute in Being and Nothingness. To use one’s freedom of action, according to Sartre, means that one wills a world that bends to his or her desires. Rule-governed situations can be included within this world only to the extent that they can be shown to involve individual choice. Greene, in emphasizing the social dimension of freedom, represents an advance on Sartre’s individualistic philosophy. She is so faithful to the idea of an involved consciousness that the idea of a detached consciousness is largely negative in her cosmology of freedom.
    [Show full text]
  • IMAGINATION, INQUIRY, & VOICE a Deweyan Approach to Education In
    AMANDA N. GULLA, HOLLY FAIRBANK, & STEPHEN M. NOONAN IMAGINATION, INQUIRY, & VOICE A Deweyan Approach to Education in a 21st Century Urban high School Figure 1. MGHS student ARTE Spring Mural. 2018. Retrieved from: https://www.mghs.nyc/apps/pages/index.jsp?uREC_ID=1111369&type=d&pREC_ID=14063 71 Abstract: We describe the ways in which the teachers and administrators at The Maxine Greene High School for Imaginative Inquiry (MGHS), an urban public high school named for the philosopher Maxine Greene, are working to embody Greene’s and Dewey’s notion of imagination in the context of a practice called “imaginative inquiry.” Greene considered the role of the imagination in education as a call to action, for once one can imagine a better world, one is compelled to act. Following on and extending Dewey’s work, she defined her philosophy of aesthetic education as signifying “an initiation into new ways of seeing, hearing, feeling, moving…the nurture of a special kind of reflectiveness and expressiveness, a reaching out for meanings, a learning to learn" (p. 7). Imaginative inquiry, the vehicle for enacting an aesthetic education curriculum, is a practice that is fueled by curiosity by which the imagination interacts with the world to bring about multiple possible meanings and ways of understanding. We reflect upon the process by which we are currently working in collaboration with the teachers at MGHS to make the work of imaginative inquiry accessible to all students, and to provide resources to support the work of imaginative inquiry and aesthetic education in high schools. P. Maarhuis, AG Rud (eds.), Imaging Dewey: Artful works and dialogue about Art as Experience, 00–00.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dialectical Imagination of Maxine Greene: Social Imagination As Critical Pedagogy
    Fairfield University DigitalCommons@Fairfield Graduate School of Education & Allied GSEAP Faculty Publications Professions 2016 The Dialectical Imagination of Maxine Greene: Social Imagination as Critical Pedagogy Wendy Kohli Fairfield University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.fairfield.edu/education-facultypubs Copyright 2016 Purdue University Peer Reviewed Repository Citation Kohli, Wendy, "The Dialectical Imagination of Maxine Greene: Social Imagination as Critical Pedagogy" (2016). GSEAP Faculty Publications. 128. https://digitalcommons.fairfield.edu/education-facultypubs/128 Published Citation Kohli, Wendy. "The Dialectical Imagination of Maxine Greene: Social Imagination as Critical Pedagogy." Education and Culture 32, no. 1 (2016): 15-24. This item has been accepted for inclusion in DigitalCommons@Fairfield by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Fairfield. It is brought to you by DigitalCommons@Fairfield with permission from the rights- holder(s) and is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses, you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/or on the work itself. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Dialectical Imagination of Maxine Greene: Social Imagination as Critical Pedagogy
    [Show full text]
  • Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction Du Branch Patrimoine De I'edition
    POSSIBILITIES FOR NEW BEGINNINGS: OPPRESSION, SOCIAL AGENCY, AND EDUCATION by Rula Kahil A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements For the degree of Master of Arts Department of Theory and Policy Studies in Education University of Toronto ©Copyright by Rula Kahil (2008) Library and Bibliotheque et 1*1 Archives Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-45238-7 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-45238-7 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives and Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par Plntemet, prefer, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans loan, distribute and sell theses le monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, worldwide, for commercial or non­ sur support microforme, papier, electronique commercial purposes, in microform, et/ou autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. this thesis. Neither the thesis Ni la these ni des extraits substantiels de nor substantial extracts from it celle-ci ne doivent etre imprimes ou autrement may be printed or otherwise reproduits sans son autorisation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Passionate Mind of Maxine Greene: 'I Am…Not Yet'
    The Passionate Mind of Maxine Greene Dedication: For Maxine Greene Note: All royalties from this collection go to Center for the Arts, Social Imagination, and Education founded by Maxine Greene at Teachers College, Columbia University. The Passionate Mind of Maxine Greene: ‘I Am…Not Yet’ Edited by William F.Pinar UK Falmer Press, 1 Gunpowder Square, London, EC4A 3DE USA Falmer Press, Taylor & Francis Inc., 1900 Frost Road, Suite 101, Bristol, PA 19007 © William F.Pinar 1998 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without permission in writing from the publisher. First published in 1998 This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2005. “To purchase your own copy of this or any of Taylor & Francis or Routledge’s collection of thousands of eBooks please go to www.eBookstore.tandf.co.uk.” A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN 0-203-98072-7 Master e-book ISBN ISBN 0 7507 0812 3 cased ISBN 0 7507 0878 6 paper Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data are available on request Cover design by Caroline Archer Cover printed in Great Britain by Flexiprint Ltd., Lancing, East Sussex. Every effort has been made to contact copyright holders for their permission to reprint material in this book. The publishers would be grateful to hear from any copyright holder who is not here acknowledged and will undertake to rectify any errors or omissions in future editions of this book.
    [Show full text]