Judicial Review Systems in West Africa: a Comparative Analysis a Comparative Africa: in West Systems Review Judicial

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Judicial Review Systems in West Africa: a Comparative Analysis a Comparative Africa: in West Systems Review Judicial Judicial Review Systems in West Africa A Comparative Analysis Judicial Review Systems West in Africa: Comparative A Analysis The legal systems in West African countries are uniquely diverse. They have their foundations in different colonial heritages and have been shaped by a great variety of customary and religious norms, which affects the design of each country’s judicial system. At the same time, the region is growing together under the umbrella of the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS). This book compares the constitutional justice institutions in 16 West African states and analyses the diverse ways in which these institutions render justice and promote democratic development. There is no single best approach: different legal traditions tend to produce different design options. It also seeks to facilitate mutual learning and understanding among countries in the region, especially those with different legal systems, in efforts to frame a common West African system. The authors analyse a broad spectrum of issues related to constitutional justice institutions in West Africa. While navigating technical issues such as competence, composition, access, the status of judges, the authoritative power of these institutions and their relationship with other institutions, they also take a novel look at analogous institutions in pre-colonial Africa with similar functions, as well as the often-taboo subject of the control and accountability of these institutions. International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (International IDEA) Strömsborg, SE-103 34 Stockholm, Sweden Tel: +46 8 698 37 00, fax: +46 8 20 24 22 Email: [email protected], website: www.idea.int Hanns Seidel Foundation Lazarettstraße 33 80636 Munich, Germany Tel.: +49 89 1258-0 | Fax: -356 Email: [email protected], website: www.hss.de ISBN: 978-91-7671-052-4 Judicial Review Systems in West Africa A Comparative Analysis Judicial Review Systems in West Africa A Comparative Analysis Lead writers Markus Böckenförde Babacar Kante Yuhniwo Ngenge H. Kwasi Prempeh International IDEA resources on constitution-building processes © 2016 International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance © 2016 Hanns Seidel Foundation International IDEA Strömsborg SE-103 34, STOCKHOLM SWEDEN Tel: +46 8 698 37 00, fax: +46 8 20 24 22 Email: [email protected], website: www.idea.int Hanns Seidel Foundation Lazarettstraße 33 80636 Munich, Germany Tel.: +49 89 1258-0 | Fax: -356 Email: [email protected], website: www.hss.de The electronic version of this publication is available under a Creative Commons Attribute-NonCommercial- ShareAlike 3.0 licence. You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the publication as well as to remix and adapt it provided it is only for non-commercial purposes, that you appropriately attribute the publication, and that you distribute it under an identical licence. For more information on this licence see: <http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/>. International IDEA publications are independent of specific national or political interests. Views expressed in this publication do not necessarily represent the views of International IDEA or the Hanns Seidel Foundation, or those of their respective Boards or Council members. Graphic design by Turbo Design ISBN: 978-91-7671-052-4 Contents Preface .......................................................................................................................................................... 9 Foreword .................................................................................................................................................... 12 Acknowledgements .......................................................................................................................... 14 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 17 Markus Böckenförde 2. Traditional and historical antecedents of constitutional justice in West Africa ...................................................................................................................... 29 Yuhniwo Ngenge 3. Institutional models for constitutional justice in contemporary West Africa .................................................................................................... 45 Yuhniwo Ngenge 4. Constitutional framework for the independence of constitutional review institutions .................................................................................. 57 Markus Böckenförde and Yuhniwo Ngenge 5. Judicial service commissions ............................................................................................ 67 Babacar Kante and H. Kwasi Prempeh 6. The composition of constitutional justice institutions ................................. 75 Markus Böckenförde 7. Reviewing the constitutionality of laws .................................................................... 89 Yuhniwo Ngenge 8. Other competences of constitutional review institutions ......................... 101 Babacar Kante and H. Kwasi Prempeh 9. Access to constitutional review institutions ......................................................... 117 Babacar Kante and H. Kwasi Prempeh 10. Authority of the decisions of constitutional review institutions ....... 125 Babacar Kante and H. Kwasi Prempeh International IDEA 5 11. Watching the watchdogs ..................................................................................................... 137 Markus Böckenförde 12. Conclusion and outlook ........................................................................................................ 145 Markus Böckenförde and Yuhniwo Ngenge Annex: Questionnaire template .............................................................................................. 151 Glossary ...................................................................................................................................................... 160 References and further reading .............................................................................................. 166 About the authors ............................................................................................................................. 175 About International IDEA ............................................................................................................ 178 About the Hanns Seidel Foundation ................................................................................... 179 More International IDEA resources on constitution-building processes ............................................................................................ 180 6 International IDEA List of tables and figures Table 1.1. West African legal systems, institutional types and terms of judicial tenure ........................................................................... 18 Table 1.2. Index values, deviations from France and indicator congruence of former French colonies with the French model ........................................................................................ 22 Table 1.3. Integration of customary and religious law in West African constitutions and judicial systems ................... 25 Table 2.1. Historical evolution of constitutional justice systems in West Africa ....................................................................................... 41 Table 4.1. Budget autonomy and insulation of salaries of constitutional judges in West Africa ................................................ 63 Table 5.1. Judicial service commissions in West Africa ................................... 67 Table 6.1. Overview of the composition and dismissal process for members of constitutional justice institutions in West Africa .............................................................................................................. 84 Table 7.1. Types of constitutional review and normative instruments subject to control: francophone and lusophone West Africa ............................................................................. 93 Table 7.2. Types of constitutional review and normative instruments subject to control: anglophone West Africa ..... 99 Table 8.1. Other competences of constitutional justice institutions in West Africa .............................................................................................................. 113 Table 10.1. Judgements of constitutional review institutions in West Africa .............................................................................................................. 133 International IDEA 7 Figure 3.1. West Africa in the global distribution of the judicial model of constitutional review ................................................................... 47 Figure 3.2. Distribution of the judicial model of constitutional review in West Africa ........................................................................................... 48 Figure 3.3. Distribution of Kelsenian-type institutions in West Africa .............................................................................................................. 49 Figure 3.4. Pure and non-pure models of Kelsenian-type institutions in West Africa .............................................................................................................. 50 Figure 6.1. Selection by the legislature through a supermajority ............. 78 Figure 6.2. Selection through a consecutive process ........................................... 79 Figure
Recommended publications
  • Newton Spence and Peter Hughes V the Queen
    SAINT VINCENT & THE GRENADINES IN THE COURT OF APPEAL CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 20 OF 1998 BETWEEN: NEWTON SPENCE Appellant and THE QUEEN Respondent and SAINT LUCIA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 14 OF 1997 BETWEEN: PETER HUGHES Appellant and THE QUEEN Respondent Before: The Hon. Sir Dennis Byron Chief Justice The Hon. Mr. Albert Redhead Justice of Appeal The Hon. Mr. Adrian Saunders Justice of Appeal (Ag.) Appearances: Mr. J. Guthrie QC, Mr. K. Starmer and Ms. N. Sylvester for the Appellant Spence Mr. E. Fitzgerald QC and Mr. M. Foster for the Appellant Hughes Mr. A. Astaphan SC, Ms. L. Blenman, Solicitor General, Mr. James Dingemans, Mr. P. Thompson, Mr. D. Browne, Solicitor General, Dr. H. Browne and Ms. S. Bollers for the Respondents -------------------------------------------- 2000: December 7, 8; 2001: April 2. -------------------------------------------- JUDGMENT [1] BYRON, C.J.: This is a consolidated appeal, which concerns two appellants convicted of murder and sentenced to death in Saint Vincent and Saint Lucia respectively who exhausted their appeals against conviction and raised constitutional arguments against the mandatory sentence of death before the Privy Council which had not previously been raised in the Eastern Caribbean Court of Appeal. Background [2] The Privy Council granted leave to both appellants to appeal against sentence and remitted the matter to the Eastern Caribbean Court of Appeal to consider and determine whether (a) the mandatory sentence of death imposed should be quashed (and if so what sentence (including the sentence of death) should be imposed), or (b) the mandatory sentence of death imposed ought to be affirmed.
    [Show full text]
  • When the Dust Settles
    WHEN THE DUST SETTLES Judicial Responses to Terrorism in the Sahel By Junko Nozawa and Melissa Lefas October 2018 Copyright © 2018 Global Center on Cooperative Security All rights reserved. For permission requests, write to the publisher at: 1101 14th Street NW, Suite 900 Washington, DC 20005 USA DESIGN: Studio You London CONTRIBUTING AUTHORS: Heleine Fouda, Gildas Barbier, Hassane Djibo, Wafi Ougadeye, and El Hadji Malick Sow SUGGESTED CITATION: Junko Nozawa and Melissa Lefas, “When the Dust Settles: Judicial Responses to Terrorism in the Sahel,” Global Center on Cooperative Security, October 2018. globalcenter.org @GlobalCtr WHEN THE DUST SETTLES Judicial Responses to Terrorism in the Sahel By Junko Nozawa and Melissa Lefas October 2018 ABOUT THE AUTHORS JUNKO NOZAWA JUNKO NOZAWA is a Legal Analyst for the Global Center on Cooperative Security, where she supports programming in criminal justice and rule of law, focusing on human rights and judicial responses to terrorism. In the field of international law, she has contrib- uted to the work of the International Criminal Court, regional human rights courts, and nongovernmental organizations. She holds a JD and LLM from Washington University in St. Louis. MELISSA LEFAS MELISSA LEFAS is Director of Criminal Justice and Rule of Law Programs for the Global Center, where she is responsible for overseeing programming and strategic direction for that portfolio. She has spent the previous several years managing Global Center programs throughout East Africa, the Middle East, North Africa, the Sahel, and South Asia with a primary focus on human rights, capacity development, and due process in handling terrorism and related cases.
    [Show full text]
  • Initial Report Submitted by Guinea Pursuant to Articles 16 and 17 of the Covenant, Due in 1990*
    United Nations E/C.12/GIN/1 Economic and Social Council Distr.: General 16 May 2019 English Original: French English, French, and Spanish only Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights Initial report submitted by Guinea pursuant to articles 16 and 17 of the Covenant, due in 1990* [Date received: 29 March 2019] * The present document is being issued without formal editing. GE.19-08043 (E) 050819 060819 E/C.12/GIN/1 Contents Page Part 1: General information about Guinea ..................................................................................... 3 I. Geography ..................................................................................................................................... 3 II. Demographic, economic and social characteristics of Guinea ...................................................... 3 III. Constitutional, political and legal structure of Guinea .................................................................. 5 IV. General framework for the protection and promotion of human rights in Guinea ........................ 6 Part 2: Information on articles 1 to 15 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights ............................................................................................................. 12 Article 1: Right to self-determination............................................................................................ 12 Article 2: International cooperation .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights and Constitution Making Human Rights and Constitution Making
    HUMAN RIGHTS AND CONSTITUTION MAKING HUMAN RIGHTS AND CONSTITUTION MAKING New York and Geneva, 2018 II HUMAN RIGHTS AND CONSTITUTION MAKING Requests to reproduce excerpts or to photocopy should be addressed to the Copyright Clearance Center at copyright.com. All other queries on rights and licenses, including subsidiary rights, should be addressed to: United Nations Publications, 300 East 42nd St, New York, NY 10017, United States of America. E-mail: [email protected]; website: un.org/publications United Nations publication issued by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) Photo credit: © Ververidis Vasilis / Shutterstock.com The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Symbols of United Nations documents are composed of capital letters combined with figures. Mention of such a figure indicates a reference to a United Nations document. HR/PUB/17/5 © 2018 United Nations All worldwide rights reserved Sales no.: E.17.XIV.4 ISBN: 978-92-1-154221-9 eISBN: 978-92-1-362251-3 CONTENTS III CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .................................................................................. 1 I. CONSTITUTIONAL REFORMS AND HUMAN RIGHTS ......................... 2 A. Why a rights-based approach to constitutional reform? .................... 3 1. Framing the issue .......................................................................3 2. The constitutional State ................................................................6 3. Functions of the constitution in the contemporary world ...................7 4. The constitution and democratic governance ..................................8 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Judicial Review and the Conseil D'etat George D
    Boston College Law School Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School Boston College Law School Faculty Papers January 1966 DeGaulle's Republic and the Rule of Law: Judicial Review and the Conseil d'Etat George D. Brown Boston College Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/lsfp Part of the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons Recommended Citation George D. Brown. "DeGaulle's Republic and the Rule of Law: Judicial Review and the Conseil d'Etat." Boston University Law Review 46, (1966): 462-492. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Boston College Law School Faculty Papers by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. :DE GAULLE'S REPUBLIC AND THE RULE OF LAW: JUDICIAL REVIEW AND THE CONSEIL D'ETAT GEORGE D. BROWN* Americans tend to regard France as a somewhat despotic country where drivers' licenses are summarily revoked by roadside tribunals, political opponents are treated badly, and in general the rule of law is lightly regarded.' From time to time disgruntled Frenchmen come forward to reinforce this picture.2 Against such a background of illiber- alism, the lack of judicial review of legislation in France does not seem surprising. And it has become a commonplace to present the French hostility to judicial review as a polar example of attitudes toward this institution.3 Yet there are ample signs that this generalization needs to be reexamined.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberia Election Watch, Issue No. 5, Sept. 26, 2005
    LIBERIA ELECTION WATCH Issue No. 5, September 26, 2005 LIBERIA 2005 ELECTIONS Voters in Liberia go to the polls on October 11, 2005, to elect a President and Vice President, 30 Senators and 64 Representatives. These elections will close a two-year transition period that began in October 2003 with the establishment of the National Transitional Government of Liberia (NTGL). The transition process is governed by the Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA), signed by representatives of Liberia’s warring factions, political parties and civil society in Accra, Ghana, in August 2003. Election Watch is compiled jointly by the National Democratic Institute (NDI) and The Carter Center. Final Voter Registration Roll Published Liberia’s National Elections Commission (NEC) has released the final registration roll of eligible voters for the October 11, 2005, presidential and legislative elections. According to the NEC, the final number of registered voters is 1,352,730, with slightly more women than men registered to vote. The average age of registrants is 35, and 35 percent of registrants live in Montserrado County, where the capital, Monrovia, is located. Electoral Disputes at the Supreme Court The Supreme Court of Liberia recently heard four cases related to electoral disputes, which could have significant consequences for the overall process. In the most significant petition, the Coalition for Transformation of Liberia (COTOL), which includes the Liberia Action Party of presidential candidate Varney Sherman and the Chairman of the National Transitional Government of Liberia (NTGL), Gyude Bryant, argued that since there are two senatorial seats in each county, each voter must be allowed to cast two ballots, one for each of the two senatorial seats.
    [Show full text]
  • The Seychelles Law Reports
    THE SEYCHELLES LAW REPORTS DECISIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT, CONSTITUTIONAL COURT AND COURT OF APPEAL ________________ 2017 _________________ PART 2 (Pp i-vi, 269-552) Published by Authority of the Chief Justice i (2017) SLR EDITORIAL BOARD Chief Justice – ex officio Attorney-General – ex officio Mr Kieran Shah of Middle Temple, Barrister Mr Bernard Georges of Gray’s Inn, Barrister CITATION These reports are cited thus: (2017) SLR Printed by ii THE SEYCHELLES JUDICIARY THE COURT OF APPEAL Hon F MacGregor, President Hon S Domah Hon A Fernando Hon J Msoffe Hon M Twomey THE SUPREME COURT (AND CONSTITUTIONAL COURT) Hon M Twomey,Chief Justice Hon D Karunakaran Hon B Renaud Hon M Burhan Hon G Dodin Hon F Robinson Hon E De Silva Hon C McKee Hon D Akiiki-Kiiza Hon R Govinden Hon S Govinden Hon S Nunkoo Hon M Vidot Hon L Pillay Master E Carolus iii (2017) SLR iv CONTENTS Digest of Cases ................................................................................................ vii Cases Reported Amesbury v President of Seychelles & Constitutional Appointments Authority ........ 69 Benstrong v Lobban ............................................................................................... 317 Bonnelame v National Assembly of Seychelles ..................................................... 491 D’Acambra & Esparon v Esparon ........................................................................... 343 David & Ors v Public Utilities Corporation .............................................................. 439 Delorie v Government of Seychelles
    [Show full text]
  • MOROCCO: Human Rights at a Crossroads
    Human Rights Watch October 2004 Vol. 16, No. 6(E) MOROCCO: Human Rights at a Crossroads I. SUMMARY................................................................................................................................ 1 II. RECOMMENDATIONS...................................................................................................... 4 To the Government of Morocco ........................................................................................... 4 To the Equity and Reconciliation Commission ................................................................... 6 To the United Nations............................................................................................................. 7 To the U.S. Government.........................................................................................................8 To the European Union and its member states................................................................... 8 To the Arab League.................................................................................................................. 9 III. INTRODUCTION: ADDRESSING PAST ABUSES................................................... 9 The Equity and Reconciliation Commission......................................................................14 Limits of the New Commission ...........................................................................................16 2003 Report of the Advisory Council for Human Rights ................................................23 IV. HUMAN RIGHTS AFTER THE
    [Show full text]
  • Private Prosecutions in Mauritius: Clarifying Locus Standi and Making the Director of Public Prosecutions More Accountable
    African Journal of Legal Studies 10 (2017) 1–34 brill.com/ajls Private Prosecutions in Mauritius: Clarifying Locus Standi and Making the Director of Public Prosecutions more Accountable Jamil Ddamulira Mujuzi University of the Western Cape, South Africa [email protected] Abstract Case law shows that private prosecutions have been part of Mauritian law at least since 1873. In Mauritius there are two types of private prosecutions: private prosecutions by individuals; and private prosecutions by statutory bodies. Neither the Mauritian consti- tution nor legislation provides for the right to institute a private prosecution. Because of the fact that Mauritian legislation is not detailed on the issue of locus standi to insti- tute private prosecutions and does not address the issue of whether or not the Director of Public Prosecutions has to give reasons when he takes over and discontinues a pri- vate prosecution, the Supreme Court has had to address these issues. The Mauritian Supreme Court has held, inter alia, that a private prosecution may only be instituted by an aggrieved party (even in lower courts where this is not a statutory requirement) and that the Director of Public Prosecutions may take over and discontinue a private prosecution without giving reasons for his decision. However, the Supreme Court does not define “an aggrieved party.” In this article the author takes issue with the Court’s findings in these cases and, relying on legislation from other African countries, recom- mends how the law could be amended to strengthen the private prosecutor’s position. Keywords private prosecutions – Mauritius – Locus Standi – Director of Public Prosecutions – aggrieved party – supreme court © koninklijke brill nv, leiden, ���7 | doi �0.��63/�7087384-��3400Downloaded�6 from Brill.com10/03/2021 04:36:42PM via free access 2 Mujuzi I Introduction Private prosecutions have been part of Mauritian law for a long period of time.1 In Mauritius there are two types of private prosecutions: private pros- ecutions by individuals; and private prosecutions by statutory bodies.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of the Judiciary in the Implementation of the Conventions on the Right of the Child in Benin1
    THE ROLE OF THE JUDICIARY IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CONVENTIONS ON THE RIGHT OF THE CHILD IN BENIN1 By Sakinatou BELLO* The State by its commitments to international conventions is free to choose to implement these standards and impose an obligation not only to respect them in its dealings with other parties but also implement them in its own territory2. International Convention on the Rights of the Child, despite its special nature3, is no exception to these general rules of international law. These Conventions, because they essentially place obligations on the State for the benefit of its people, they have no real value unless they are implemented on the territory of the State Party4. Thus, the actual introduction of the Conventions on the Rights of the Child appears as an important first step towards the realization of rights promoted and protected by the beneficiaries. Today, the doctrine and State practice teach us two important trends regarding the introduction of international standards into domestic law: the dualistic and the monistic method. If Sciotti-Lam5 rightly considers that dualism makes it difficult for the validity of international conventions on human rights in domestic law, there is no doubt that the monistic method6 facilitates the effectiveness of the Conventions on human rights in general but even more those relating to child rights7. The monistic theory of the introduction of international standards into domestic law, which advocates for, among others, Krabbe, Leon Duguit, but above all the Austrian school of jurists whose master was Hans Kelsen and torchbearer8, affirms the unity between the international legal order and domestic legal order.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberia-Human Rights-Fact Finding Mission Report-1998-Eng
    Fact-Finding/Needs Assessment Mission to L ib e ria 11-16 May 1998 nal Commission of Jurists The International CommLfdion of Jur'uftj (IC J) permits free reproduction of extracts from any of its publications provided that due acknowledgement is given and a copy of the publication carrying the extract is sent to its headquar­ ters at the following address: International Communion of Juridtd (ICJ) P.O.Box 216 81 A, avenue de Chatelaine CH - 1219 Chatelaine/Geneva Switzerland Telephone : (4122) 97958 00; Fax : (4122) 97938 01 e-mail: [email protected] C o n t e n t s Introduction ................................................................................. 7 Historical Background................................................................ 8 Structure of the State................................................................... 11 The Executive........................................................................ 11 The Legislature...................................................................... 11 The Judiciary.......................................................................... 12 The Courts and the Application of Substantive Laws........... 12 Judicial Independence................................................................ 13 Legal and Judicial Protection of Human Rights .................... 14 The Bar and related Bodies ....................................................... 17 The Role of Local Non-Governmental Organizations........... 18 International Governmental and Non-Governmental Organizations .................................
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of Guinea-Bissau Ministry of Public Health, Family and Social Cohesion Institute for Women and Children
    Republic of Guinea-Bissau Ministry of Public Health, Family and Social Cohesion Institute for Women and Children 1st Implementation Report of the African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child (2008 - 2018) Bissau, October TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Acronyms and Abbreviations...............................................4 I. INTRODUCTION...........................................................7 II. METHODOLOGY OF WORK. ...............................................12 2.1 Methodology for the Drafting of the Report on the Implementation of the African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child, is based on.......................................................................................12 III. GENERAL IMPLEMENTATION OR ENFORCEMENT MEASURES……......................................14 3.1. Legislation and the African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child –ACRWC............... 14 a) National Legal Instruments Relating to the Rights of the Child........................................................ 15 45. (b) International legal instruments of human rights, particularly the children’s rights, to which Guinea-Bissau is a party .................................................................................................................... 16 3.2 Policy Measures, Programs and Actions for the Implementation of the African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child.............................................................................................................17 3.3. Mechanisms for the Implementation
    [Show full text]