Nature for People a Biodiversity Action Plan for Enfield Adopted September 2011

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Nature for People a Biodiversity Action Plan for Enfield Adopted September 2011 Nature for People A Biodiversity Action Plan for Enfield Adopted September 2011 www.enfield.gov.uk Foreword Enfield is one of London’s greenest boroughs. With Partnership, Natural England and the Environment the Lee Valley Regional Park, private gardens and 123 Agency to get the action plan up and running, and are parks and public open spaces, 37 allotment sites, more already getting to work on some of the objectives. than 300 hectares of woodland and 100 kilometres of We need to do all we can to protect and enhance rivers and streams, we have a wealth of biodiversity Enfield’s rich wildlife heritage for everyone to enjoy, both right here on our doorstep. now and in the future. Enfield is home to some important populations of nationally and internationally scarce plant and animal species like the great crested newt, and the black redstart (a robin-sized bird) which has been spotted in the east of the borough, and some nationally scarce habitats such as our acid grassland. The Biodiversity Action Plan is about more than protecting our wildlife - conserving and enhancing biodiversity contributes to our health and wellbeing and our economic prosperity, ensuring that we are well placed to adapt to the threat of climate change. Providing quality and biodiverse green spaces for people to enjoy their free time improves the quality of Councillor Del Goddard life for everyone who lives here. Cabinet Member for Regeneration Maintaining and enhancing the borough’s biodiversity and Improving Localities is a task for us all. The Council has a community leadership role and responsibility to conserve, protect and enhance our natural habitats. The Biodiversity Action Plan sets out our commitment to action, making sure that we integrate biodiversity conservation into our activities, plans, policies and programmes. We hope that the Biodiversity Action Plan will raise awareness of the importance of biodiversity and will attract interest from members of the public and Councillor Chris Bond wildlife enthusiasts as well as technical experts. We Cabinet Member for Environment, have been working in partnership with wildlife groups Street Scene and Parks and organisations such as The London Biodiversity Contents 1. Biodiversity 4 Grants and funding for Biodiversity Management and Enhancements 19 What is biodiversity? 4 Green Flag Sites 21 Why is biodiversity important? 4 Trees and the Urban Forest 21 What is a Biodiversity Action Plan? 4 Roads and Highways 22 Why do we need a Biodiversity Action Plan in Enfield? 4 New Development 22 Developer contributions 22 2. Background 6 Policies and plans 23 The Rio Convention 6 The Value Xof Nature 23 The 2001 European Union Summit in Gothenburg 6 Legislation 23 The UK Biodiversity Action Plan 6 Green infrastructure 24 The London Biodiversity Action Plan 7 Climate change 25 The Enfield Biodiversity Action Plan 7 Place Shaping 26 The International Year of Biodiversity 7 Access to Nature 26 The 2010 Nagoya Summit 7 Strategic Growth Areas 26 Place Shaping Priority Areas 27 3. Biodiversity in Enfield 8 The Area around Enfield Town Station 27 Habitats 8 Edmonton 27 Species 9 Meridian Water 27 4. The Enfield Biodiversity Action Plan 10 New Southgate 28 How will the Enfield Biodiversity Action Plan be structured? 10 Ponders End 28 Aims and objectives 10 People and Wildlife 29 Further Education 29 The Enfield Biodiversity Action Plan Partnership 11 Partnership Working 30 Cross-cutting Themes and Generic Actions 11 Invasive species 30 Habitats Action Plans 12 Neighbouring Authorities 30 Species and Species-groups Action Plans 14 Ecological Records 30 Action Plan Structure and Delivery 14 Annual Review and Reporting 14 6. Cross-cutting Theme Actions 33 Appendix 1 – UK and London BAP priority species recorded 5. Cross-Cutting Themes 16 in Enfield between 1999 and 2009 36 The Landscape Scale or Ecosystem approach 16 Appendix 2 – List of organisations involved in the Enfield BAP 41 Management of parks and open spaces 16 partnership to date Local Wildlife Sites 16 Appendix 3 – Glossary of terms 42 London Habitat Targets 19 4 NatureNature for for People: People: A A Biodiversity Biodiversity Action Action Plan Plan for for Enfield Enfield 1. Biodiversity What is biodiversity? What is a Biodiversity Action Plan? Biodiversity is the variety of life and its processes; A Biodiversity Action Plan (BAP) is a framework for including the variety of living organisms, the genetic conserving and enhancing biodiversity and sets the differences amongst them, and the communities and targets and actions to achieve this. ecosystems in which they occur. An ecosystem is a There are a range of levels of BAP: country-wide (e.g. community of plants, animals and microorganisms, the UK Biodiversity Action Plan), regional (e.g. The along with their environment, that function together as a London BAP), local (e.g. The Enfield BAP), or site unit (an ecosystem can be as large as a rain forest or as (e.g. a Nature Reserve BAP). A BAP often consists of small as a rotting log). Habitat and Species Action Plans. Why is biodiversity important? Why do we need a Biodiversity Action Biodiversity is important in its own right and is an Plan in Enfield? indicator of the wider health of the environment. Biodiversity is under threat; globally species are declining Biodiversity is good for people’s quality of life. at an alarming rate and the extent and quality of the A diverse and healthy environment improves quality of ecosystems that supports them is diminishing. If this life and provides recreational and educational resources continues it will have serious consequences for mankind, for all sectors of the community. especially in the face of climate change, as we all rely Biodiversity provides natural services (sometimes on biodiversity for our survival. Actions happen at a local referred to as ecosystem services). These are level and a BAP provides a framework to ensure that ‘components of nature, directly enjoyed, consumed, actions are coordinated and targeted towards the areas or used to yield human well-being’, and are key to our most likely to achieve biodiversity gains. survival, providing amongst other things, food, clean In Enfield we are fortunate to have a wealth of green air and water. spaces and important habitats and species, both in Biodiversity will help us adapt to climate change; as the our urban and more rural areas. However without climate changes healthy ecosystems and the services management, this biodiversity will diminish. This will they provide will be increasingly valuable (but at the same have a negative impact on the environmental quality of the borough and the wellbeing of the people who time biodiversity will be threatened by an increasingly Amphibian survey – Forty Hall unpredictable climate). live here. The Enfield BAP is an important source of information for key stakeholders and decision makers including land managers, developers, planners and others. Nature for People: A Biodiversity Action Plan for Enfield 5 Oak Canopy. Enfield Town 6 Nature for People: A Biodiversity Action Plan for Enfield 2. Background The Rio Convention The 2001 European Union Summit The UK Biodiversity Action Plan In 1992, at the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro, in Gothenburg The UK Biodiversity Action Plan, first published in 1994, the UK, along with 168 other countries made a At the 2001 European Union Summit in Gothenburg, was the UK Government’s response to signing the formal commitment to work together to protect the European leaders made a commitment to halt Convention on Biological Diversity. environment. Amongst other treaties the Convention biodiversity loss by 2010. This led to the formation The plan set out a programme for conserving the UK’s on Biological Diversity was signed, this had three main of the Countdown 2010 partnership an international biodiversity and led to the production of 436 action goals: the conservation of biodiversity; the sustainable coalition of partners committed to efforts to tackle the plans for many of the UK’s most threatened species use of its components; and the equitable sharing of causes of biodiversity loss. and habitats. The UK BAP priority list was reviewed in benefits arising from genetic resources. Unfortunately the 2010 target was not met and 2007 and includes 1,150 species and 65 habitats that It recognised for the first time in international law that biodiversity loss continues at an alarming rate. In are a priority for conservation actions. the conservation of biological diversity is ‘a common March 2010 the EU made a new commitment to Each of the UK’s Four Countries have different concern of humankind’ and the convention is one of halting ‘the loss of biodiversity and the degradation strategies to implement the UK BAP and a new the key drivers of biodiversity conservation. of ecosystem services in the EU by 2020, framework for delivering priority habitats and species in and restoring them in so far as feasible, while England, ‘Securing Biodiversity’, was published by the stepping up the EU contribution to averting global Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs biodiversity loss.’ in 2008. This emphasises the need to take a landscape scale approach to biodiversity conservation and to embed climate change adaptation principles in conservation action. Common knapweed Polluted stream Rays Road Open Space Spindle tree Nature for People: A Biodiversity Action Plan for Enfield 7 The London Biodiversity Action Plan The Enfield Biodiversity Action Plan The International Year of Biodiversity
Recommended publications
  • Managing for Species: Integrating the Needs of England’S Priority Species Into Habitat Management
    Natural England Research Report NERR024 Managing for species: Integrating the needs of England’s priority species into habitat management. Part 2 Annexes www.naturalengland.org.uk Natural England Research Report NERR024 Managing for species: Integrating the needs of England’s priority species into habitat management. Part 2 Annexes Webb, J.R., Drewitt, A.L. and Measures, G.H. Natural England Published on 15 January 2010 The views in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of Natural England. You may reproduce as many individual copies of this report as you like, provided such copies stipulate that copyright remains with Natural England, 1 East Parade, Sheffield, S1 2ET ISSN 1754-1956 © Copyright Natural England 2010 Project details This report results from work undertaken by the Evidence Team, Natural England. A summary of the findings covered by this report, as well as Natural England's views on this research, can be found within Natural England Research Information Note RIN024 – Managing for species: Integrating the needs of England’s priority species into habitat management. This report should be cited as: WEBB, J.R., DREWITT, A.L., & MEASURES, G.H., 2009. Managing for species: Integrating the needs of England’s priority species into habitat management. Part 2 Annexes. Natural England Research Reports, Number 024. Project manager Jon Webb Natural England Northminster House Peterborough PE1 1UA Tel: 0300 0605264 Fax: 0300 0603888 [email protected] Contractor Natural England 1 East Parade Sheffield S1 2ET Managing for species: Integrating the needs of England’s priority species into habitat i management.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study on Avifauna Present in Different Zones of Chitral Districts
    Journal of Bioresource Management Volume 4 Issue 1 Article 4 A Study on Avifauna Present in Different Zones of Chitral Districts Madeeha Manzoor Center for Bioresource Research Adila Nazli Center for Bioresource Research, [email protected] Sabiha Shamim Center for Bioresource Research Fida Muhammad Khan Center for Bioresource Research Follow this and additional works at: https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/jbm Part of the Environmental Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Manzoor, M., Nazli, A., Shamim, S., & Khan, F. M. (2017). A Study on Avifauna Present in Different Zones of Chitral Districts, Journal of Bioresource Management, 4 (1). DOI: 10.35691/JBM.7102.0067 ISSN: 2309-3854 online (Received: May 29, 2019; Accepted: May 29, 2019; Published: Jan 1, 2017) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by CORE Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Bioresource Management by an authorized editor of CORE Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A Study on Avifauna Present in Different Zones of Chitral Districts Erratum Added the complete list of author names © Copyrights of all the papers published in Journal of Bioresource Management are with its publisher, Center for Bioresource Research (CBR) Islamabad, Pakistan. This permits anyone to copy, redistribute, remix, transmit and adapt the work for non-commercial purposes provided the original work and source is appropriately cited. Journal of Bioresource Management does not grant you any other rights in relation to this website or the material on this website. In other words, all other rights are reserved. For the avoidance of doubt, you must not adapt, edit, change, transform, publish, republish, distribute, redistribute, broadcast, rebroadcast or show or play in public this website or the material on this website (in any form or media) without appropriately and conspicuously citing the original work and source or Journal of Bioresource Management’s prior written permission.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera in Cheshire in 2002
    Lepidoptera in Cheshire in 2002 A Report on the Micro-Moths, Butterflies and Macro-Moths of VC58 S.H. Hind, S. McWilliam, B.T. Shaw, S. Farrell and A. Wander Lancashire & Cheshire Entomological Society November 2003 1 1. Introduction Welcome to the 2002 report on lepidoptera in VC58 (Cheshire). This is the second report to appear in 2003 and follows on from the release of the 2001 version earlier this year. Hopefully we are now on course to return to an annual report, with the 2003 report planned for the middle of next year. Plans for the ‘Atlas of Lepidoptera in VC58’ continue apace. We had hoped to produce a further update to the Atlas but this report is already quite a large document. We will, therefore produce a supplementary report on the Pug Moths recorded in VC58 sometime in early 2004, hopefully in time to be sent out with the next newsletter. As usual, we have produced a combined report covering micro-moths, macro- moths and butterflies, rather than separate reports on all three groups. Doubtless observers will turn first to the group they are most interested in, but please take the time to read the other sections. Hopefully you will find something of interest. Many thanks to all recorders who have already submitted records for 2002. Without your efforts this report would not be possible. Please keep the records coming! This request also most definitely applies to recorders who have not sent in records for 2002 or even earlier. It is never too late to send in historic records as they will all be included within the above-mentioned Atlas when this is produced.
    [Show full text]
  • Bilimsel Araştırma Projesi (8.011Mb)
    1 T.C. GAZİOSMANPAŞA ÜNİVERSİTESİ Bilimsel Araştırma Projeleri Komisyonu Sonuç Raporu Proje No: 2008/26 Projenin Başlığı AMASYA, SİVAS VE TOKAT İLLERİNİN KELKİT HAVZASINDAKİ FARKLI BÖCEK TAKIMLARINDA BULUNAN TACHINIDAE (DIPTERA) TÜRLERİ ÜZERİNDE ÇALIŞMALAR Proje Yöneticisi Prof.Dr. Kenan KARA Bitki Koruma Anabilim Dalı Araştırmacı Turgut ATAY Bitki Koruma Anabilim Dalı (Kasım / 2011) 2 T.C. GAZİOSMANPAŞA ÜNİVERSİTESİ Bilimsel Araştırma Projeleri Komisyonu Sonuç Raporu Proje No: 2008/26 Projenin Başlığı AMASYA, SİVAS VE TOKAT İLLERİNİN KELKİT HAVZASINDAKİ FARKLI BÖCEK TAKIMLARINDA BULUNAN TACHINIDAE (DIPTERA) TÜRLERİ ÜZERİNDE ÇALIŞMALAR Proje Yöneticisi Prof.Dr. Kenan KARA Bitki Koruma Anabilim Dalı Araştırmacı Turgut ATAY Bitki Koruma Anabilim Dalı (Kasım / 2011) ÖZET* 3 AMASYA, SİVAS VE TOKAT İLLERİNİN KELKİT HAVZASINDAKİ FARKLI BÖCEK TAKIMLARINDA BULUNAN TACHINIDAE (DIPTERA) TÜRLERİ ÜZERİNDE ÇALIŞMALAR Yapılan bu çalışma ile Amasya, Sivas ve Tokat illerinin Kelkit havzasına ait kısımlarında bulunan ve farklı böcek takımlarında parazitoit olarak yaşayan Tachinidae (Diptera) türleri, bunların tanımları ve yayılışlarının ortaya konulması amaçlanmıştır. Bunun için farklı böcek takımlarına ait türler laboratuvarda kültüre alınarak parazitoit olarak yaşayan Tachinidae türleri elde edilmiştir. Kültüre alınan Lepidoptera takımına ait türler içerisinden, Euproctis chrysorrhoea (L.), Lymantria dispar (L.), Malacosoma neustrium (L.), Smyra dentinosa Freyer, Thaumetopoea solitaria Freyer, Thaumetopoea sp. ve Vanessa sp.,'den parazitoit elde edilmiş,
    [Show full text]
  • Encyclopaedia of Birds for © Designed by B4U Publishing, Member of Albatros Media Group, 2020
    ✹ Tomáš Tůma Tomáš ✹ ✹ We all know that there are many birds in the sky, but did you know that there is a similar Encyclopaedia vast number on our planet’s surface? The bird kingdom is weird, wonderful, vivid ✹ of Birds and fascinating. This encyclopaedia will introduce you to over a hundred of the for Young Readers world’s best-known birds, as well as giving you a clear idea of the orders in which birds ✹ ✹ are classified. You will find an attractive selection of birds of prey, parrots, penguins, songbirds and aquatic birds from practically every corner of Planet Earth. The magnificent full-colour illustrations and easy-to-read text make this book a handy guide that every pre- schooler and young schoolchild will enjoy. Tomáš Tůma www.b4upublishing.com Readers Young Encyclopaedia of Birds for © Designed by B4U Publishing, member of Albatros Media Group, 2020. ean + isbn Two pairs of toes, one turned forward, ✹ Toco toucan ✹ Chestnut-eared aracari ✹ Emerald toucanet the other back, are a clear indication that Piciformes spend most of their time in the trees. The beaks of toucans and aracaris The diet of the chestnut-eared The emerald toucanet lives in grow to a remarkable size. Yet aracari consists mainly of the fruit of the mountain forests of South We climb Woodpeckers hold themselves against tree-trunks these beaks are so light, they are no tropical trees. It is found in the forest America, making its nest in the using their firm tail feathers. Also characteristic impediment to the birds’ deft flight lowlands of Amazonia and in the hollow of a tree.
    [Show full text]
  • Additions, Deletions and Corrections to An
    Bulletin of the Irish Biogeographical Society No. 36 (2012) ADDITIONS, DELETIONS AND CORRECTIONS TO AN ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF THE IRISH BUTTERFLIES AND MOTHS (LEPIDOPTERA) WITH A CONCISE CHECKLIST OF IRISH SPECIES AND ELACHISTA BIATOMELLA (STAINTON, 1848) NEW TO IRELAND K. G. M. Bond1 and J. P. O’Connor2 1Department of Zoology and Animal Ecology, School of BEES, University College Cork, Distillery Fields, North Mall, Cork, Ireland. e-mail: <[email protected]> 2Emeritus Entomologist, National Museum of Ireland, Kildare Street, Dublin 2, Ireland. Abstract Additions, deletions and corrections are made to the Irish checklist of butterflies and moths (Lepidoptera). Elachista biatomella (Stainton, 1848) is added to the Irish list. The total number of confirmed Irish species of Lepidoptera now stands at 1480. Key words: Lepidoptera, additions, deletions, corrections, Irish list, Elachista biatomella Introduction Bond, Nash and O’Connor (2006) provided a checklist of the Irish Lepidoptera. Since its publication, many new discoveries have been made and are reported here. In addition, several deletions have been made. A concise and updated checklist is provided. The following abbreviations are used in the text: BM(NH) – The Natural History Museum, London; NMINH – National Museum of Ireland, Natural History, Dublin. The total number of confirmed Irish species now stands at 1480, an addition of 68 since Bond et al. (2006). Taxonomic arrangement As a result of recent systematic research, it has been necessary to replace the arrangement familiar to British and Irish Lepidopterists by the Fauna Europaea [FE] system used by Karsholt 60 Bulletin of the Irish Biogeographical Society No. 36 (2012) and Razowski, which is widely used in continental Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Bird Observer VOLUME 37, NUMBER 6 DECEMBER 2009 HOT BIRDS
    Bird Observer VOLUME 37, NUMBER 6 DECEMBER 2009 HOT BIRDS Marshall Iliff found and photographed this LeConte’s Sparrow (left) on October 20, 2009, at Cumberland Farms in Halifax/Middleboro. On October 21, 2009, Jeff Johnstone found a Scissor-tailed Flycatcher (right) at the Orange Airport, and later that day Bob Stymeist took this photograph. Cumberland Farms is a fall hotspot. On November 4, 2009, Jim Sweeney discovered a Lark Bunting (left), and later that day Wayne Petersen took this image. On November 17, 2009, Paul Petersen discovered this MacGillivray’s Warbler (right) in the Victory Gardens in Boston’s Fenway. On November 22, Phil Brown took this fabulous portrait. Rick Heil found this Mew Gull (left), possibly of the Kamchatka race, on November 26, 2009, in Gloucester Harbor. Phil Brown took this great photo in Brace’s Cove on December 7, 2009. CONTENTS BIRDING BY BICYCLE ON THE NASHUA RIVER RAIL TRAIL David Deifik 333 HEY, CAPTAIN, THE BIRDS ARE OVER THERE Frederick Wasti 340 THE POLITICAL LANDSCAPE: DARK CITY Jennifer Ryan and Christina McDermott 344 NOT JUST ANOTHER BIRDING CONTEST —THIS IS THE SUPERBOWL! David Larson 346 FIELD NOTES Two Observations of Walking or Running by Northern Flickers, Colaptes auratus Jim Berry 349 Notes on Nestling Coloration and Feeding Frequency in the Eastern Wood-Pewee, Contopus virens Jim Berry 350 Update on Lesser Black-backed Gull Julie Ellis 362 Specimen of a Eurasian Tree Sparrow Found Dead in a Shipping Container from China Tom French 353 A COMPARISON OF THE AVIAN COMMUNITIES IN WINTER IN A FOREST AND ADJACENT SUBURB William E.
    [Show full text]
  • The Moths (Lepidoptera) of Glasgow Botanic Gardens
    The Glasgow Naturalist (online 2019) Volume 27, Part 1 The moths (Lepidoptera) of Glasgow Botanic Gardens R.B. Weddle 89 Novar Drive, Glasgow G12 9SS E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT At the end of 2018 the species list included 201 distinct The moths that have been recorded in the Glasgow moth species; this may be compared with the 859 moths Botanic Gardens, Scotland over the years are reviewed which had been recorded in Glasgow as a whole at the and assessed in the context of the City of Glasgow, the same date. In this account I shall comment on just a few vice-county of Lanarkshire (VC77), and the U.K. in of those 201 species, which seem to be significant in one general. The additions to the list since the last review in way or another. More detail on any of the records can be 1999 are highlighted. Some rare and endangered species obtained from Glasgow Museums Biological Record are reported, though the comparatively low frequency of Centre, and Scottish distribution maps of the various sightings of several normally common species suggests moths can be found at www.eastscotland- that the site is generally under-recorded. The same is butterflies.org.uk/mothflighttimes.html true of Glasgow and Lanarkshire in general. In the 2017 Bioblitz (including the Bat & Moth Night) INTRODUCTION 15 species of moth were recorded; two of these (rosy There are few records of moths in the Glasgow Botanic rustic and bulrush wainscot) are highlighted in the Gardens (GBG) prior to 1980-1999 when Dr Robin following sections.
    [Show full text]
  • Database of Irish Lepidoptera. 1 - Macrohabitats, Microsites and Traits of Noctuidae and Butterflies
    Database of Irish Lepidoptera. 1 - Macrohabitats, microsites and traits of Noctuidae and butterflies Irish Wildlife Manuals No. 35 Database of Irish Lepidoptera. 1 - Macrohabitats, microsites and traits of Noctuidae and butterflies Ken G.M. Bond and Tom Gittings Department of Zoology, Ecology and Plant Science University College Cork Citation: Bond, K.G.M. and Gittings, T. (2008) Database of Irish Lepidoptera. 1 - Macrohabitats, microsites and traits of Noctuidae and butterflies. Irish Wildlife Manual s, No. 35. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Dublin, Ireland. Cover photo: Merveille du Jour ( Dichonia aprilina ) © Veronica French Irish Wildlife Manuals Series Editors: F. Marnell & N. Kingston © National Parks and Wildlife Service 2008 ISSN 1393 – 6670 Database of Irish Lepidoptera ____________________________ CONTENTS CONTENTS ........................................................................................................................................................1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ....................................................................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................2 The concept of the database.....................................................................................................................2 The structure of the database...................................................................................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • EUROPEAN BIRDS of CONSERVATION CONCERN Populations, Trends and National Responsibilities
    EUROPEAN BIRDS OF CONSERVATION CONCERN Populations, trends and national responsibilities COMPILED BY ANNA STANEVA AND IAN BURFIELD WITH SPONSORSHIP FROM CONTENTS Introduction 4 86 ITALY References 9 89 KOSOVO ALBANIA 10 92 LATVIA ANDORRA 14 95 LIECHTENSTEIN ARMENIA 16 97 LITHUANIA AUSTRIA 19 100 LUXEMBOURG AZERBAIJAN 22 102 MACEDONIA BELARUS 26 105 MALTA BELGIUM 29 107 MOLDOVA BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA 32 110 MONTENEGRO BULGARIA 35 113 NETHERLANDS CROATIA 39 116 NORWAY CYPRUS 42 119 POLAND CZECH REPUBLIC 45 122 PORTUGAL DENMARK 48 125 ROMANIA ESTONIA 51 128 RUSSIA BirdLife Europe and Central Asia is a partnership of 48 national conservation organisations and a leader in bird conservation. Our unique local to global FAROE ISLANDS DENMARK 54 132 SERBIA approach enables us to deliver high impact and long term conservation for the beneit of nature and people. BirdLife Europe and Central Asia is one of FINLAND 56 135 SLOVAKIA the six regional secretariats that compose BirdLife International. Based in Brus- sels, it supports the European and Central Asian Partnership and is present FRANCE 60 138 SLOVENIA in 47 countries including all EU Member States. With more than 4,100 staf in Europe, two million members and tens of thousands of skilled volunteers, GEORGIA 64 141 SPAIN BirdLife Europe and Central Asia, together with its national partners, owns or manages more than 6,000 nature sites totaling 320,000 hectares. GERMANY 67 145 SWEDEN GIBRALTAR UNITED KINGDOM 71 148 SWITZERLAND GREECE 72 151 TURKEY GREENLAND DENMARK 76 155 UKRAINE HUNGARY 78 159 UNITED KINGDOM ICELAND 81 162 European population sizes and trends STICHTING BIRDLIFE EUROPE GRATEFULLY ACKNOWLEDGES FINANCIAL SUPPORT FROM THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION.
    [Show full text]
  • Scottish Macro-Moth List, 2015
    Notes on the Scottish Macro-moth List, 2015 This list aims to include every species of macro-moth reliably recorded in Scotland, with an assessment of its Scottish status, as guidance for observers contributing to the National Moth Recording Scheme (NMRS). It updates and amends the previous lists of 2009, 2011, 2012 & 2014. The requirement for inclusion on this checklist is a minimum of one record that is beyond reasonable doubt. Plausible but unproven species are relegated to an appendix, awaiting confirmation or further records. Unlikely species and known errors are omitted altogether, even if published records exist. Note that inclusion in the Scottish Invertebrate Records Index (SIRI) does not imply credibility. At one time or another, virtually every macro-moth on the British list has been reported from Scotland. Many of these claims are almost certainly misidentifications or other errors, including name confusion. However, because the County Moth Recorder (CMR) has the final say, dubious Scottish records for some unlikely species appear in the NMRS dataset. A modern complication involves the unwitting transportation of moths inside the traps of visiting lepidopterists. Then on the first night of their stay they record a species never seen before or afterwards by the local observers. Various such instances are known or suspected, including three for my own vice-county of Banffshire. Surprising species found in visitors’ traps the first time they are used here should always be regarded with caution. Clerical slips – the wrong scientific name scribbled in a notebook – have long caused confusion. An even greater modern problem involves errors when computerising the data.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Cumbrian Lepidoptera (2000)
    A Checklist of the Butterflies and larger Moths of Cumbria Edited by Bill Kydd and Stephen Hewitt A Checklist of the Butterflies and larger Moths of Cumbria Edited by Bill Kydd and Stephen Hewitt February 2000 Tullie House Museum and Art Gallery Castle Street Carlisle © Carlisle City Council 2000 The Cumbria Biological Records Database at Tullie House Museum Tullie House Museum maintains a database of wildlife sightings from across the county of Cumbria. Some 140,000 records from Cumbria are stored on computer, backed up by large collections of voucher and reference specimens. The Museum aims to record and monitor the status of wildlife in Cumbria. The information is used to increase the knowledge of the wildlife of the county and to inform decisions affecting the wildlife and countryside of Cumbria. Tullie House welcomes information and records concerning the wildlife of Cumbria. Provisional distribution atlases are available for the following groups: Mammals in Cumbria 1999 Butterflies in Cumbria 2000 Dragonflies in Cumbria 1994 Grasshoppers and Crickets in Cumbria 1993 Ladybirds in Cumbria 1998 Reptiles in Cumbria 1992 Amphibians in Cumbria 1995 Please send your wildlife sightings to the Keeper of Natural Sciences, Tullie House Museum, Castle Street, Carlisle CA3 8TP. Tel: 01228 534781 ext. 248. Fax: 01228 810249. E-mail: [email protected] Introduction The purpose of this checklist is to assist local moth recorders in assessing their own records and captures. We hope that it will enable recorders to identify unusual and important records as they occur and further stimulate the study of moths in Cumbria. Bill Kydd acted as County Lepidoptera Recorder for Cumbria Naturalists’ Union from 1979 to 1997.
    [Show full text]