Analog by Katherine Melissa Sifers a Thesis Submitted to the Faculty Of
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Analog by Katherine Melissa Sifers AAS in Photography, January 2002, Ohio Institute of Photography and Technology BFA Photography, June 2005, Columbia College Chicago A Thesis submitted to The Faculty of Columbian College of Arts and Sciences of The George Washington University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Fine Arts May 15, 2011 Thesis directed by Bibiana Obler Assistant Professor of Art History Siobhan Rigg Assistant Professor of New Media © Copyright 2011 by Katherine Melissa Sifers All rights reserved ii Abstract of Thesis Analog This thesis seeks to explain the artist’s decision to work with seventeenth-century Dutch vanitas and memento mori still life painting as the primary influence upon her body of photographic still life. The thesis describes the connection the artist asserts between seventeenth-century Dutch culture and the contemporary American popular culture, politics and the current economic situation. The thesis also describes the artist’s interest in mysterum tremendum et fascinans and how that interest finds shape in her photographic production. The thesis delves into the artist’s relationship to object through an exploration of the opposing views of object and craft exemplified by the artist’s grandmothers. iii Table of Contents Abstract of Thesis.............................................................................................. iii List of Figures......................................................................................................v Analog ............................................................................................................ 1-15 Figures..........................................................................................................16-21 Bibliography.................................................................................................22-23 iv List of Figures Figure 1 J. Falk, Untitled ...................................................................................16 Figure 2 Katherine Sifers, Wilson and Hagman ...............................................16 Figure 3 Willem Claesz Heda, Banquet Piece with Mince Pie .......................17 Figure 4 Adriaen Coorte, Still Life with Asparagus and Red Currants ...........17 Figure 5 Katherine Sifers, after Coorte #3........................................................17 Figure 6 Willem Kalf, Still Life.........................................................................18 Figure 7 Katherine Sifers, after Kalf #13..........................................................18 Figure 8 Katherine Sifers, after Heda #10........................................................18 Figure 9 analog Installation view #1.................................................................19 Figure 10 analog Installation view #2...............................................................19 Figure 11 analog Installation view #3..............................................................20 Figure 12 analog Installation view #4...............................................................20 Figure 13 analog Installation view #5...............................................................21 Figure 14 analog Installation view #6...............................................................21 v Analog For as long as I can remember I have been preoccupied with the mystery that surrounds death. When I was born, many of my great-grandparents and their siblings were still alive, but when I was around the age of five these relatives started passing away, strangely always in the spring. As a child I thought that spring was when people died and all that remained of them were their possessions. For me these objects became relics that had been touched and transformed by use and were reminders of the transience of life. As an adult, I have made an effort to understand and come to terms with my overwhelming fear of death through exploring the work of artists, philosophers, writers, and filmmakers who deal with the subject in their own work. It was while reading Jacques Derrida’s The Gift of Death that I first encountered the term mysterum tremendum used to describe the fear of the mystery surrounding death. I was intrigued by the term. I investigated the origin of the phrase and found that Derrida was only discussing half of the phrase mysterium tremendum et fascinans. It was originally used by Rudolph Otto to describe the simultaneous feeling of fascination and overwhelming fear that occurs when contemplating death.1 I was elated to find the very feeling I experienced described so succinctly and to find that I was not alone in the experience. This feeling looms over and touches all aspects of my life. It shapes how I live and it has influenced the choices that I made throughout my life. My ever-present awareness of this mystery has fueled my search for scholarship and art that deal with being and mortality. 1 Todd A. Gooch, The Numinous and Modernity: An Interpretation of Rudolf Otto's Philosophy of Religion, (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2000) 1 In relation to my work, the most important art historical precedent in which life and death are addressed is seventeenth-century Dutch memento mori and vanitas still life paintings. These painting address the relationship between life and death in a language of things. The first memento mori painting I encountered hangs in the Indianapolis Museum of Art. J. Falk’s Untitled (1629) follows the conventions of the genre and consists of an arrangement of two skulls, a bone, a single red rose, and a smoking oil lamp. [Fig. 1] An inscription in Latin below the painted objects reads, "All that is human is smoke, shadow, vanity and the picture of a stage.”2 My interest in this painting was not based solely on its obvious allusion to death, but also on the use of objects in the painting to communicate the concept of mortality. This painting introduced me to the idea that objects can represent meaning beyond their function or identity and convey specific intention. Memento mori and vanitas paintings are composed of objects that have gained meaning from both organized religion and popular culture. Religion is a major influence on how societies construct their behavior toward life, death, and mourning; however, because of the violent history of organized religion, I am not interested in making work that derives its meaning and context from religious conventions. The inability to communicate over secular and religious issues can be observed historically and presently in the relationships between the three Abrahamic religions. Derrida refers to them as “religions of the Book, the religions of the races of Abraham,” i.e. Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. 3 All three religions developed from similar roots and were shaped by ambiguous texts. Despite the inherent parallels of their 2 J. Falk, Untitled (1629), Original Latin “Omnia humana Fumus, umbra, vanitas et imaginem adhuc.” 3 Jacques Derrida, The Gift of Death, (Chicago: University of Chicago, 1995), 64. 2 foundations, there has not been strong philosophical agreement between these religions or even within their various sects. Instead these religions have a long history of cycling between uneasy peace and violence. It is difficult for me to understand how these systems created by man for coping with the mystery and the fear of death have become the major causes of structural and physical violence throughout history and into the present. Because of this violence, it is important for me to find a method of communication that can speak to the brevity of life in a secular and spiritual manner as opposed to relying on religion. Northern Renaissance painting grew out of a tradition of depicting religious themes overtly and continued to produce objects of religious and moral contemplation but in a radically different and revolutionary form in the still life and genre scenes of the seventeenth century. Depiction of the sacred and mysterious is just part of what I believe these artists were considering while creating these paintings and I am inclined to work with still life despite my resistance to organized religion. Prior to the seventeenth century, the painting of northern Europe focused mainly on biblical or historical motifs and was often funded by the Catholic Church or by other religious organizations. Dutch separation from the Holy Roman Empire allowed for a new pictorial relationship with faith and led to the shift away from illustrative, biblically themed works toward the depictions of everyday life that typify Dutch paintings.4 Religious tensions within the region were not resolved by the Dutch people securing freedom to practice their preferred Christian beliefs. Western Europe was occupied by both Protestants and Catholics, creating an environment of internal, structural, and 4 Norman Bryson, “Abundance” in Looking at the Overlooked: Four Essays on Still Life Painting, (London, UK: Reaktion, 2001), 115-117. 3 physical violence; Holland was no exception.5 These are the secular and religious underpinnings of the environment within which vanitas and memento mori still life painting motifs developed. In the midst of the Reformation, Dutch culture wrestled with how to balance faith and spiritual views with its ever-increasing material wealth. In his essay, “Abundance,” Norman Bryson writes about the cultural change brought about by abundant access to goods: “Dutch still life painting is a dialogue between this newly affluent society and its material possessions.”6 My own relationship to objects