Archaeological Expeditions of the Peabody Museum in Middle Tennessee, 1877-1884

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Archaeological Expeditions of the Peabody Museum in Middle Tennessee, 1877-1884 ARCHAEOLOGICAL EXPEDITIONS OF THE PEABODY MUSEUM IN MIDDLE TENNESSEE, 1877-1884 Michael C. Moore and Kevin E. Smith TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION DIVISION OF ARCHAEOLOGY RESEARCH SERIES NO. 16 2009 Revised 2012 ARCHAEOLOGICAL EXPEDITIONS OF THE PEABODY MUSEUM IN MIDDLE TENNESSEE, 1877-1884 Michael C. Moore and Kevin E. Smith with a contribution by: Stephen T. Rogers Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation Division of Archaeology Research Series No. 16 2009 Revised 2012 i Copyright © 2002 President and Fellows of Harvard College Images presented in Figures 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 63, 67, 68, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 104, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 155, 156, 157, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 176, 177, 178, 179, 180, 181, 182, 183, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188, 189, 190, 191, 192, 193, 194, 195, 196, 197, 198, 199, 200, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240, 241, 242, 243, 248, 249, 250, 251, 252, 253, 254, 255, 256, 257, 258, 259, 262, 263, 264, 265, and 275. Copyright © John Bigelow Taylor Image presented in Figure 277. Cover figure: Sketch map of Mound Bottom by Edwin Curtiss, May 1878 (Putnam Letterbook IV-C, #597, Peabody Museum Collections Dept., Harvard University). Pursuant to the State of Tennessee’s policy of non-discrimination, the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation does not discriminate on the basis of race, sex, religion, color, national or ethnic origin, age, disability, or military service in its policies, or in the admission or access to, or treatment or employment in its programs, services or activities. Equal Employment Opportunity/Affirmative Action inquiries or complaints should be directed to the EEO/AA Coordinator, Office of General Counsel, 401 Church Street, 20th Floor L & C Tower, Nashville, TN 37243, 1-888-867-7455. ADA inquiries or complaints should be directed to the ADA Coordinator, Human Resources Division, 401 Church Street, 12th Floor L & C Tower, Nashville, TN 37243, 1-866-253- 5827. Hearing impaired callers may use the Tennessee Relay Service (1-800-848- 0298). Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation, Authorization No. 327236, 600 copies. This public document was promulgated at a cost of $11.35 per copy. July 2009 . ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF FIGURES...........................................................................................……….. vi LIST OF TABLES............................................................................................………… xv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS.............................................................................................. xvii I. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND..................................................…......... 1 The Engagement of Mr. Edwin Curtiss............................................................. 5 The Engagement of Mr. George Woods and “Brother Joe Woods”………….. 7 Influences on Putnam……………………………………………………………. 8 II. 1877 PUTNAM AND CURTISS EXPLORATIONS………………………………. 13 Fort Zollicoffer (40DV32)……………….….…………………………………… 13 Overton Estate (40DV11)………………………………………………………. 15 Miss Bowling’s Farm (40DV426)……………………………………………….. 18 Love Mound (40DV39)…………………………………………………………. 34 Other Archaeological Research at the Love Mound Site………………… 36 John Dowd……………………………………………………………….. 36 Tennessee Division of Archaeology……………………………………. 38 Gary Barker……………………………………………………………… 39 Lindsley Estate (40WI1)................…………………………………………….. 40 Other Archaeological Research at the Lindsley Estate Site…………….. 52 Tennessee Division of Archaeology…………………………………… 52 T. F. Wilkinson’s Farm (40DV6)……………………………………………….. 54 Other Archaeological Research at Wilkinson’s Farm………..…………… 58 Dr. Joseph Jones………………………………………………………… 58 Gates P. Thruston……………………………………………………….. 58 William Edward Myer……………………………………………………. 58 Vanderbilit University…………………………………………………….. 60 Tennessee Division of Archaeology……………………………………. 62 Clees Plantation Mound (40DV14?)…………………………………………… 65 Edmundson Place (40DV573)…………………………………………………. 67 III. 1878 CURTISS EXPLORATIONS………………………………………………… 69 Flynn’s Lick (40JK15)……………….….……………………………………….. 69 Flynn’s Lick Burial Caves (40JK14)……………….….………………………… 71 Ray Mound (40JK11?)……………….….……………………………………… 72 Rogers Farm (Roaring River)……….….………………………………………… 73 Cains Chapel (40DV3)……………….….………………………………………. 74 Other Archaeological Research at Cains Chapel………..……………….. 85 Gates P. Thruston……………………………………………………….. 85 Tennessee Division of Archaeology……………………………………. 86 Dr. Oscar Noel……………………………………………………............ 86 Mound Bottom (40CH8)………………………………………………………… 89 Other Archaeological Research at Mound Bottom………..……………… 89 William E. Myer…………………………………………………………... 89 Parmenio E. Cox…………………………………………………............ 93 iii TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) Page WPA Excavations, 1936-1937 and 1940…………............................... 94 Tennessee Division of Archaeology/Vanderbilt University…………… 95 Link Farm (40HS6)……………….….………………………………………….. 96 Other Archaeological Research at Link Farm…………………………….. 98 WPA Excavations………………………..…………............................... 98 Tennessee State Parks/University of Memphis…………..…………… 98 Old Town (40WM2)……………….….………………………………………….. 99 Other Archaeological Research at Old Town…………………………….. 99 Joseph Jones………………………..…………...................................... 99 William M. Clark……..………………………………………………….. 101 W. G. Polk…………..…………………………………………………… 101 Tennessee Division of Archaeology…………………………………… 101 Gray’s Farm (40WM11)……………………………………………………….. 103 Marshall’s Farm (40DV48)…………………………………………………….. 121 Rutherford’s Farm (40SU15)………………………………………………….. 124 Other Archaeological Research at Rutherford’s Farm………………….. 134 Gates. P. Thruston………………..…………........................................ 134 Tennessee Division of Archaeology…………………………………… 135 IV. 1879 CURTISS EXPLORATIONS……………………………………….……….. 139 Unnamed Site (40SW38)………………..……………………………………… 139 Unnamed Site (40SW40?)………..……..…………………………………….. 140 Williams Farm (40SW40?)………..……..…………………………………….. 141 Lovell’s Farm……………………………………………………………………. 145 Cheatham County Poorhouse…………………………………………………. 147 Marrowbone Creek (40CH48?)………………………………………………… 148 Emily Hayes Farm (40WM5)…………………………………………………… 149 Other Archaeological Research at Emily Hayes Farm………………….. 155 Southeastern Indian Antiquities Survey.............................................. 155 Glass Mounds (40WM3)……………………………………………………….. 157 Stalls Farm………………………………………………………………………. 159 Bannister’s Farm………………………………………………………………… 160 West’s Farm…………………………………………………………………….. 162 Green’s Place…………………………………………………………………… 165 Perkins Farm……………………………………………………………………. 166 Anderson’s Farm (40DS44)……………………………………………………. 168 Hodges Place…………………………………………………………………… 171 Dozier’s Place…………………………………………………………………… 172 Gower’s Place…………………………………………………………………… 173 V. 1882 PUTNAM EXPLORATIONS………………………………………………… 177 Dr. Jarman’s Farm (40WM210)……………………………………………….. 177 Other Archaeological Research at Dr. Jarman’s Farm…………………. 189 Tennessee Division of Archaeology…................................................ 189 Stone Statues from Dr. Frost’s Farm…………………………………………. 194 John Owen Hunt Mound (40WM86)…………………………………………… 196 iv TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) Page VI. 1883-1884 GEORGE WOODS EXPLORATIONS………………………………. 199 VII. THE RISE AND DECLINE OF THE CUMBERLAND CHIEFDOMS…………… 201 Provisional Revised Regional Chronology…………………………………… 202 Insights, Observations, and Hypotheses from the Collections……………… 210 Zoomorphic Effigy Forms………………………………………………….. 215 Anthropomorphic Effigy Forms……………………………………………. 219 Duck River Knives and Swords…………………………………………… 222 Concluding Remarks……………………………………………………………. 223 REFERENCES CITED................................................................................................. 227 APPENDIX A: 1877 DOCUMENT TRANSCRIPTIONS……………………………… 235 APPENDIX B: 1878 DOCUMENT TRANSCRIPTIONS……………………………... 249 APPENDIX C: 1879 DOCUMENT TRANSCRIPTIONS……………………………... 289 APPENDIX D: 1880 DOCUMENT TRANSCRIPTIONS……………………………... 323 APPENDIX E: 1881 DOCUMENT TRANSCRIPTIONS……………………………... 327 APPENDIX F: 1882 DOCUMENT TRANSCRIPTIONS……………………………… 331 APPENDIX G: 1883 DOCUMENT TRANSCRIPTIONS……………………………… 355 APPENDIX H: 1884 DOCUMENT TRANSCRIPTIONS……………………………… 359 APPENDIX I: ARTIFACTS RECOVERED FROM THE PEABODY MUSEUM EXPEDITIONS IN MIDDLE TENNESSEE………………………………………… 361 APPENDIX J: INDEX TO ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES AND ILLUSTRATED ARTIFACTS…………………………………………………………………………… 393 v LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1. Frederic Ward Putnam………………………………………………………….…. 2 2. Identified middle Tennessee sites explored by the Peabody Museum………. 12 3. Copper ornament from stone grave 3, Ft. Zollicoffer…………………………… 13 4. Cox style marine shell gorget from stone grave excavated by Mrs. Overton’s gardener………………………......…………………………………. 16 5. Polished quartzite discoidal from stone grave excavated by Mrs. Overton’s gardener……………………….............……………………………. 16 6. Negative painted, human effigy hooded bottle from stone grave 8, Overton Estates…………………………………………………………………………… 17 7. Notched rim bowl from stone grave 8, Overton Estates……………………….
Recommended publications
  • A Many-Storied Place
    A Many-storied Place Historic Resource Study Arkansas Post National Memorial, Arkansas Theodore Catton Principal Investigator Midwest Region National Park Service Omaha, Nebraska 2017 A Many-Storied Place Historic Resource Study Arkansas Post National Memorial, Arkansas Theodore Catton Principal Investigator 2017 Recommended: {){ Superintendent, Arkansas Post AihV'j Concurred: Associate Regional Director, Cultural Resources, Midwest Region Date Approved: Date Remove not the ancient landmark which thy fathers have set. Proverbs 22:28 Words spoken by Regional Director Elbert Cox Arkansas Post National Memorial dedication June 23, 1964 Table of Contents List of Figures vii Introduction 1 1 – Geography and the River 4 2 – The Site in Antiquity and Quapaw Ethnogenesis 38 3 – A French and Spanish Outpost in Colonial America 72 4 – Osotouy and the Changing Native World 115 5 – Arkansas Post from the Louisiana Purchase to the Trail of Tears 141 6 – The River Port from Arkansas Statehood to the Civil War 179 7 – The Village and Environs from Reconstruction to Recent Times 209 Conclusion 237 Appendices 241 1 – Cultural Resource Base Map: Eight exhibits from the Memorial Unit CLR (a) Pre-1673 / Pre-Contact Period Contributing Features (b) 1673-1803 / Colonial and Revolutionary Period Contributing Features (c) 1804-1855 / Settlement and Early Statehood Period Contributing Features (d) 1856-1865 / Civil War Period Contributing Features (e) 1866-1928 / Late 19th and Early 20th Century Period Contributing Features (f) 1929-1963 / Early 20th Century Period
    [Show full text]
  • SEAC Bulletin 58.Pdf
    SOUTHEASTERN ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 72ND ANNUAL MEETING NOVEMBER 18-21, 2015 NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE BULLETIN 58 SOUTHEASTERN ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONFERENCE BULLETIN 58 PROCEEDINGS OF THE 72ND ANNUAL MEETING NOVEMBER 18-21, 2015 DOUBLETREE BY HILTON DOWNTOWN NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE Organized by: Kevin E. Smith, Aaron Deter-Wolf, Phillip Hodge, Shannon Hodge, Sarah Levithol, Michael C. Moore, and Tanya M. Peres Hosted by: Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Middle Tennessee State University Division of Archaeology, Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation Office of Social and Cultural Resources, Tennessee Department of Transportation iii Cover: Sellars Mississippian Ancestral Pair. Left: McClung Museum of Natural History and Culture; Right: John C. Waggoner, Jr. Photographs by David H. Dye Printing of the Southeastern Archaeological Conference Bulletin 58 – 2015 Funded by Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation, Authorization No. 327420, 750 copies. This public document was promulgated at a cost of $4.08 per copy. October 2015. Pursuant to the State of Tennessee’s Policy of non-discrimination, the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation does not discriminate on the basis of race, sex, religion, color, national or ethnic origin, age, disability, or military service in its policies, or in the admission or access to, or treatment or employment in its programs, services or activities. Equal Employment Opportunity/Affirmative Action inquiries or complaints should be directed to the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation, EEO/AA Coordinator, Office of General Counsel, 312 Rosa L. Parks Avenue, 2nd floor, William R. Snodgrass Tennessee Tower, Nashville, TN 37243, 1-888-867-7455. ADA inquiries or complaints should be directed to the ADA Coordinator, Human Resources Division, 312 Rosa L.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 16 Number 1 Fall 2012
    Fall 2012 KENTUCKYARCHAEOLOGY I The Newsletter of the Kentucky Organization of Professional Archaeologists TABLEOF CONTENTS in a timely manner is a key issue for members as well as those who submit items. We obtained only Editor's Note .... 1 one submittal that was used to generate this publication. This diminutive submittal rate may Presidential Corner .... 2 reflect the snail like speed currently exhibited with getting this publication that results in members to Feature Topic: A Commentary ... .4 reject submitting their work. Perhaps it may also be from the overall need for members to become more Paper and Poster Abstracts Presented at the 29th involved, more out spoken on their work, and ideas Annual Kentucky Heritage Council (KHC) about Kentucky archaeology. Kit Wesler in his Conference .... 8 President's Corner offers several ideas on how members can help address this need. We challenge members to send in ideas on what is important to News & Announcements .... 14 them about Kentucky archaeology as well as short Native American Day .... 14 articles, interesting artifact descriptions, or Papers, Posters, and Research .... 15 explanations regarding how they contribute to KHC Abstracts .... 15 archaeology within the state. We also challenge Manuscripts ... 15 members employed by cultural resource Memorial Service ... 15 management companies and institutes working in Kentucky to submit recent abstracts of data recovery KyOPA Membership Summary .... 15 projects or summaries of significant finds relevant to the state for publication in the KyOPA Newsletter. Area of Interest. ... 16 In the not too distant past, the KyOPA Newsletter published data recovery abstracts and we seek to KyOPA Officers and Board Members ...
    [Show full text]
  • Program of the 76Th Annual Meeting
    PROGRAM OF THE 76 TH ANNUAL MEETING March 30−April 3, 2011 Sacramento, California THE ANNUAL MEETING of the Society for American Archaeology provides a forum for the dissemination of knowledge and discussion. The views expressed at the sessions are solely those of the speakers and the Society does not endorse, approve, or censor them. Descriptions of events and titles are those of the organizers, not the Society. Program of the 76th Annual Meeting Published by the Society for American Archaeology 900 Second Street NE, Suite 12 Washington DC 20002-3560 USA Tel: +1 202/789-8200 Fax: +1 202/789-0284 Email: [email protected] WWW: http://www.saa.org Copyright © 2011 Society for American Archaeology. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reprinted in any form or by any means without prior permission from the publisher. Program of the 76th Annual Meeting 3 Contents 4................ Awards Presentation & Annual Business Meeting Agenda 5………..….2011 Award Recipients 11.................Maps of the Hyatt Regency Sacramento, Sheraton Grand Sacramento, and the Sacramento Convention Center 17 ................Meeting Organizers, SAA Board of Directors, & SAA Staff 18 ............... General Information . 20. .............. Featured Sessions 22 ............... Summary Schedule 26 ............... A Word about the Sessions 28…………. Student Events 29………..…Sessions At A Glance (NEW!) 37................ Program 169................SAA Awards, Scholarships, & Fellowships 176................ Presidents of SAA . 176................ Annual Meeting Sites 178................ Exhibit Map 179................Exhibitor Directory 190................SAA Committees and Task Forces 194…….…….Index of Participants 4 Program of the 76th Annual Meeting Awards Presentation & Annual Business Meeting APRIL 1, 2011 5 PM Call to Order Call for Approval of Minutes of the 2010 Annual Business Meeting Remarks President Margaret W.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Affiliation Statement for Buffalo National River
    CULTURAL AFFILIATION STATEMENT BUFFALO NATIONAL RIVER, ARKANSAS Final Report Prepared by María Nieves Zedeño Nicholas Laluk Prepared for National Park Service Midwest Region Under Contract Agreement CA 1248-00-02 Task Agreement J6068050087 UAZ-176 Bureau of Applied Research In Anthropology The University of Arizona, Tucson AZ 85711 June 1, 2008 Table of Contents and Figures Summary of Findings...........................................................................................................2 Chapter One: Study Overview.............................................................................................5 Chapter Two: Cultural History of Buffalo National River ................................................15 Chapter Three: Protohistoric Ethnic Groups......................................................................41 Chapter Four: The Aboriginal Group ................................................................................64 Chapter Five: Emigrant Tribes...........................................................................................93 References Cited ..............................................................................................................109 Selected Annotations .......................................................................................................137 Figure 1. Buffalo National River, Arkansas ........................................................................6 Figure 2. Sixteenth Century Polities and Ethnic Groups (after Sabo 2001) ......................47
    [Show full text]
  • A Microdebitage Analysis of the Winterville Mounds Site (22WS500)
    The University of Southern Mississippi The Aquila Digital Community Master's Theses Fall 2017 A Microdebitage Analysis of the Winterville Mounds Site (22WS500) Stephanie Leigh-Ann Guest University of Southern Mississippi Follow this and additional works at: https://aquila.usm.edu/masters_theses Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Guest, Stephanie Leigh-Ann, "A Microdebitage Analysis of the Winterville Mounds Site (22WS500)" (2017). Master's Theses. 315. https://aquila.usm.edu/masters_theses/315 This Masters Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by The Aquila Digital Community. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of The Aquila Digital Community. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A MICRODEBITAGE ANALYSIS OF THE WINTERVILLE MOUNDS SITE (22WS500) by Stephanie Leigh-Ann Guest A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate School, the College of Arts and Letters, and the Department of Anthropology and Sociology at The University of Southern Mississippi in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts August 2017 A MICRODEBITAGE ANALYSIS OF THE WINTERVILLE MOUNDS SITE (22WS500) by Stephanie Leigh-Ann Guest August 2017 Approved by: ________________________________________________ Dr. Homer E. Jackson, Committee Chair Professor, Anthropology and Sociology ________________________________________________ Dr. Marie E. Danforth, Committee Member Professor, Anthropology and Sociology ________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • The Common Field Mississippian Site(23SG100), As Uncovered by the 1979 Mississippi River Flood Richard E
    The Common Field Mississippian Site(23SG100), as Uncovered by the 1979 Mississippi River Flood Richard E. Martens Two of the pictures I took during an early visit to the he Common Field site occurs near the bluffs in the site are shown in Figure 1. The first shows Mound A, the TMississippi River floodplain 3 km south of St. Gen- largest of the six then-existing mounds. The nose of my evieve and approximately 90 km south of St. Louis. It is brand-new 1980 Volkswagen parked on the farm road is a large Mississippian-period site that once had as many as in the lower right corner of the picture. The second photo eight mounds (Bushnell 1914:666). It was long considered shows the outline of a burned house structure typical of to be an unoccupied civic-ceremonial center because very many evident across the site. Although it has been noted few surface artifacts were found. This all changed due that many people visited the site shortly after the flood, I to a flood in December 1979, when the Mississippi River did not meet anyone during several visits in 1980 and 1981. swept across the Common Field site. The resulting erosion I subsequently learned that Dr. Michael O’Brien led removed up to 40 cm of topsoil, exposing: a group of University of Missouri (MU) personnel in a [a] tremendous quantity of archaeological material limited survey and fieldwork activity in the spring of 1980. including ceramic plates, pots and other vessels, articu- The first phase entailed aerial photography (black-and- lated human burials, well defined structural remains white and false-color infrared) of the site.
    [Show full text]
  • Mississippian Architecture: Temporal, Technological, and Spatial Patterning of Structures at the Toqua Site (40M R6) Richard R
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 12-1985 Mississippian Architecture: Temporal, Technological, and Spatial Patterning of Structures at the Toqua Site (40M R6) Richard R. Polhemus University of Tennessee - Knoxville Recommended Citation Polhemus, Richard R., "Mississippian Architecture: Temporal, Technological, and Spatial Patterning of Structures at the Toqua Site (40M R6). " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 1985. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/3320 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Richard R. Polhemus entitled "Mississippian Architecture: Temporal, Technological, and Spatial Patterning of Structures at the Toqua Site (40M R6)." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts, with a major in Anthropology. Charles H. Faulkner, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Gerald F. Schroedl, Jefferson Chapman Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official student records.) To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Richard R. Polhemus entitled 11Mississippian Architecture: Temporal , Technolog ical, and Spatial Patterning of Structures at the Toqua Site ( 40MR6) •11 I have examined the final copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts , with a major in Anthropology.
    [Show full text]
  • Repatriation Office Case Report Summaries Southeast Region Revised 2020
    Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History Repatriation Office Case Report Summaries Southeast Region Revised 2020 Southeast Iroquois, 1994 INVENTORY AND ASSESSMENT OF HUMAN REMAINS FROM Nansemond, THE HAND SITE (44SN22), SOUTHAMPTON COUNTY, Nottaway VIRGINIA, IN THE NATIONAL MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY This report provides an inventory and assessment of the human remains in the National Museum of Natural History (NMNH) from the Hand Site (44SN22) in southeastern Virginia. Documentation of the remains from this site was initiated in August 1993 in response to a request from Mr. Oliver Perry, Assistant Chief, Nansemond Tribe, for the return of any culturally affiliated remains from Virginia. Mr. Perry identified the Hand Site as a settlement of concern to the Nansemond from an inventory sent to him by the Department of Anthropology, NMNH. The other Native American group potentially affected by the findings of this report is the Iroquoian Nottoway, who no longer exist as a tribe. The remains of 117 individuals, represented by 97 catalogs numbers in the Physical Anthropology division of the NMNH were identified as having come from the Hand Site. They were transferred to the Department of Anthropology, NMNH by the excavation Field Director, Gerald Smith, on 26 October, 1972 and accessioned into the collections as a single assemblage on 16 January 1973. The Hand Site is an Early Historic site dating to ca. A.D. 1580- 1640 located in southeastern Virginia near the North Carolina border. This region is identified in the ethno-historic record as being occupied by the Iroquoian Nottoway in the 16-17th centuries. Although Nansemond Indians shared reservation lands with the Nottoway in the vicinity of the Hand site, their ownership of the land, from 1744 to the 1790's, post-dates occupation of the site.
    [Show full text]
  • Site Reports Vol
    SIUE FIELD SCHOOL INVESTIGATIONS IN THE LOCALE OF THE D. HITCHINS SITE (11MS1124) (Please cite as: Electronic Version, http://www.siue.edu/ANTHROPOLOGY/, 2009) Julie Zimmermann Holt Miranda Yancey Erin L. Marks Southern Illinois University Edwardsville March 2009 CONTENTS Abstract……………………………………………………………...……………………2 Acknowledgments…………………………………………….…………………….…….3 Introduction………………………………………………………………….…………….4 Setting…………………………………………………………………...……………...…5 Previous research………………………………………………………………….……..7 Geophysical survey……………………………………………………………..………..8 Surface survey……………………………………………………………………...…….10 Shovel testing……………………………………………………………….……………12 Excavation methods………………………………………………………….…………..14 Excavation results………………………………………………………….…………….15 Features…………………………………………………………………………………..21 Ceramics…………………………………………………………………………..……..27 Chert artifacts……………………………………………………………………………28 Other lithic artifacts ………………………………………………………………….….30 Plant remains…………………………………………………………………………..…31 Animal remains…………………………………………………………………….…….33 Historic artifacts………………………………………………………………………….33 Summary and discussion………………………………………………………………....33 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………….39 References………………………………………………..………………………………41 List of tables…………………………………………………………………………….44 List of figures………………………………………………………………………...…60 List of photographs……………………………………………………………………..75 1 ABSTRACT The Anthropology Department of Southern Illinois University Edwardsville conducted an archaeological field school in Hamel Township, Madison County, Illinois, between May 15 and
    [Show full text]
  • National Landmarks at Risk How Rising Seas, Floods, and Wildfires Are Threatening the United States’ Most Cherished Historic Sites
    National Landmarks at Risk How Rising Seas, Floods, and Wildfires Are Threatening the United States’ Most Cherished Historic Sites National Landmarks at Risk How Rising Seas, Floods, and Wildfires Are Threatening the United States’ Most Cherished Historic Sites Debra Holtz Adam Markham Kate Cell Brenda Ekwurzel May 2014 © 2014 Union of Concerned Scientists All rights reserved Debra Holtz is a communications consultant for the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS). She is also a professional journalist whose work includes the book Of Unknown Origin and many articles for publications including the San Francisco Chronicle. Adam Markham is director of the Climate Impacts Initiative at UCS. He has more than 20 years of experience working on conservation and climate change issues in the United States and Europe. Kate Cell is a senior campaign organizer at UCS. She specializes in involving new expert constituencies such as economists, social scientists, and health professionals in the work of the UCS Climate & Energy Program. Brenda Ekwurzel is a senior climate scientist with the UCS Climate & Energy Program. She is leading the organization’s climate science education work aimed at strengthening support for sound U.S. climate policies. The Union of Concerned Scientists puts rigorous, independent science to work to solve our planet’s most pressing problems. Joining with citizens across the country, we combine technical analysis and effective advocacy to create innovative, practical solutions for a healthy, safe, and sustainable future. More information about UCS is available on the UCS website (www.ucsusa.org). Designed by: Tyler Kemp-Benedict, Bangkok, Thailand www.hardworkingtype.com Cover photo: © William Trinkle Photography North America’s oldest masonry fort, the Castillo de San Marcos in St.
    [Show full text]
  • Canaveral National Seashore Historic Resource Study
    Canaveral National Seashore Historic Resource Study September 2008 written by Susan Parker edited by Robert W. Blythe This historic resource study exists in two formats. A printed version is available for study at the Southeast Regional Office of the National Park Service and at a variety of other repositories around the United States. For more widespread access, this administrative history also exists as a PDF through the web site of the National Park Service. Please visit www.nps.gov for more information. Cultural Resources Division Southeast Regional Office National Park Service 100 Alabama Street, SW Atlanta, Georgia 30303 404.562.3117 Canaveral National Seashore 212 S. Washington Street Titusville, FL 32796 http://www.nps.gov/cana Canaveral National Seashore Historic Resource Study Contents Acknowledgements - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - vii Chapter 1: Introduction - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 Establishment of Canaveral National Seashore - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 Physical Environment of the Seashore - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 Background History of the Area - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 Scope and Purpose of the Historic Resource Study - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3 Historical Contexts and Themes - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 4 Chapter Two: Climatic Change: Rising Water Levels and Prehistoric Human Occupation, ca. 12,000 BCE - ca. 1500 CE - - - -
    [Show full text]