2021 Hamburg Climate Futures Outlook

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2021 Hamburg Climate Futures Outlook 2021 Hamburg Climate Futures Outlook Assessing the plausibility of deep decarbonization by 2050 Cluster of Excellence Climate, Climatic Change, and Society (CliCCS) About CLICCS Researchers from a wide range of disciplines have joined forces at the Cluster of Excellence CLICCS (Climate, Climatic Change, and Society) to investigate how climate and society will co-evolve. The CLICCS program is coordinated through Universität Hamburg’s Center for Earth System Research and Sustainability (CEN) in close collaboration with multiple partner institutions and is funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG). About the Outlook In the annual Hamburg Climate Futures Outlook, CLICCS researchers make the first systematic attempt to assess which climate futures are plausible, by combining multidisciplinary assessments of plausibility. The inaugural 2021 Hamburg Climate Futures Outlook addresses the question: Is it plausible that the world will reach deep decarbonization by 2050? DOI: 10.25592/uhhfdm.9104 URL: www.cliccs.uni-hamburg.de/results/hamburg-climate-futures-outlook.html Citation Stammer, Detlef; Anita Engels; Jochem Marotzke; Eduardo Gresse; Christopher Hedemann; Jan Petzold (eds.); 2021. Hamburg Climate Futures Outlook 2021. Assessing the plausibility of deep decarbonization by 2050. Cluster of Excellence Climate, Climatic Change, and Society (CLICCS). Hamburg, Germany. Key Findings There are many possible futures of climate, but Therefore, we find that unless the enabling condi- not all possible futures are also plausible. Because tions of social drivers deliver a radical boost to these climate futures arise from a complex combination drivers in the coming years, reaching worldwide of social and physical dynamics, estimating their deep decarbonization by 2050 is not plausible (see plausibility requires insights from multiple disci- Figure 1). This result implies that, even if techno- plines. The inaugural Hamburg Climate Futures economic options for decarbonization are theoret- Outlook makes the first systematic attempt to ically available, reaching deep decarbonization by assess the plausibility of various climate futures. 2050 constitutes a societal challenge that may well We deem climate futures to be plausible if we ex- be much larger than assumed by many. pect them to unfold with appreciable probability, However, six of the evaluated social drivers given the existing evidence from the physical and show movement toward decarbonization, and social worlds. many drivers offer resources that could be utilized In this Outlook, we combine complementa- by societal actors to strengthen the enabling con- ry assessments of physical and social dynamics, ditions and therefore increase the plausibility of starting with a review of the techno-economic decarbonization in the future. Therefore, partial plausi bility of very high and very low CO2 emissions decarbonization by 2050 remains plausible under scenarios. We find evidence from the scenario lit- our current social assessment. erature which suggests that very high emissions The finding that deep decarbonization by 2050 scenarios are internally inconsistent, due to the is currently not plausible adds to the evidence extent of economic damages from climate change, speaking against the overall plausibility of very the falling cost of clean energy, and limits to recov- low emissions scenarios for the entire twenty-first erable coal reserves. The literature also provides century. Combined with the recently identified, some degree of evidence against the plausibility of narrower range of climate sensitivity, this indicates large-scale deployment of carbon dioxide removal that limiting global surface warming below about technologies, which is a common requirement of 1.7°C by 2100 is currently not plausible. very low emissions scenarios. The new climate sensitivity range, combined Very low emissions scenarios, if they are de- with our techno-economic plausibility assessment, signed to achieve the Paris Agreement’s 1.5°C target, also constrains the upper bound of plausible warm- additionally require decarbonization of the global ing, so that global surface warming above about economy by around the year 2050. Many known 4.9°C by 2100 is likewise currently not plausible. technical or economic options would in principle This assessment of plausible climate futures achieve this decarbonization goal in time. Yet ex- represents a judgement that synthesizes currently isting assessments have only begun to evaluate the available evidence. However, social agency can al- plausibility of the societal transformations neces- ways produce departures from expected trajecto- sary for deep decarbonization. Such a plausibility ries. For deep decarbonization by 2050 to become assessment requires the definition of the political, plausible, much will depend on public pressure via economic, and cultural conditions under which the protests, organized action, and climate litigation, so necessary transformations become plausible. The that governments around the globe are increasing- existing empirical evidence can then be weighed ly driven towards policies that support change, not against this theoretical model of transformation. only via goals and pledges, but by consistent action. We therefore propose the Social Plausibility Furthermore, the complex interrelations within Assessment Framework, a framework that enables social dynamics can produce unforeseen disrup- the analysis of the social drivers of decarboniza- tions, and events like the COVID-19 pandemic can tion, their enabling and constraining conditions, happen at any time. Should additional evidence, and emerging resources and structures that could including that from unexpected events, necessitate influence plausible future developments of these modifications of our assessment, this will be re- drivers. None of the ten social drivers studied show flected in future editions of the Hamburg Climate sufficient movement toward deep decarbonization. Futures ­Outlook. Some of these drivers—namely United Nations climate governance, transnational initiatives, cli- mate-related regulation, climate litigation, fossil fuel divestment, and knowledge production— support decarbonization, but without sufficient momentum to drive deep decarbonization by 2050. For two drivers—climate protests and social move- ments, and journalism—the momentum toward or away from deep decarbonization by 2050 could not be assessed. Two further drivers—consump- tion patterns and corporate responses—currently oppose decarbonization. 4 Hamburg Climate Futures Outlook 2021 ILITY SIB AU PL L N A O I IC T C OM PLA O ON U A S C S S E IB S - I E O L S I N T S Y E H D C E T VERY HIGH EMISSIONS ZATION Reference: approximate net CO emissions in 2020 Figure 1: Plausibility of net global CO2 emissions by 2050. The speedometer shows the wide range of possible emissions in the year 2050 as described in existing emissions scenarios. Emissions could reach net-zero by 2050 (deep decarbonization) or could increase up to a doubling of current emissions (very high emissions). Approximate emissions in 2020 are indicated by the speedometer needle. Here we find a reduced range of plausible emissions scenarios, supported by a techno-economic plausibility assessment (Chapter 3) and a social plausibility assessment ( Chapter 5), indicated by the shaded bands. Increasing emissions are not yet considered in the social plausibility assessment (gray band). 5 Author List PART I: Plausibility assessment of PART II: Social driver assessments climate futures Chapter 8: Chapter 1: Detlef Stammer, Anita Engels, Jochem 8.1: Stefan Aykut, Felix Schenuit, Emilie d’Amico, Marotzke, Eduardo Gresse, Christopher Hedemann, Cathrin Zengerling, Jürgen Scheffran Jan Petzold 8.2: Jürgen Scheffran, Cathrin Zengerling, Chapter 2: Detlef Stammer, Anita Engels, Jochem Andreas Lange, Emilie d’Amico Marotzke, Eduardo Gresse, Christopher Hedemann, Jan Petzold 8.3: Grischa Perino, Johannes Jarke-Neuert, Cathrin Zengerling, Martin Wickel, Felix Schenuit Box 1: Eduardo Gresse, Christopher Hedemann, Jan Petzold 8.4: Grischa Perino, Johannes Jarke-Neuert, Jan Wilkens, Christopher Pavenstädt Chapter 3: Hermann Held, Stefan Aykut, Christopher Hedemann, Chao Li, Jochem Marotzke, 8.5: Cathrin Zengerling, Stefan Aykut, Antje Wiener, Jan Petzold, Uwe Schneider Martin Wickel Box 2: Beate Ratter, Jürgen Oßenbrügge, Peter 8.6: Matthew Johnson, Timo Busch Fröhle, Hermann Held, Michael Köhl, Jan Petzold 8.7: Anita Engels, Alexander Bassen, Timo Busch, Chapter 4: Stefan Aykut, Antje Wiener, Anita Jürgen Beyer, Thomas Frisch Engels, Eduardo Gresse, Christopher Hedemann, Jan Petzold 8.8: Eduardo Gresse, Anita Engels, Junis Sander Chapter 5: Anita Engels, Eduardo Gresse, 8.9: Lars Guenther, Michael Brüggemann Christopher Hedemann, Jan Petzold 8.10: Antje Wiener, Felix Schenuit, Jan Wilkens 5.1: Eduardo Gresse, Christopher Hedemann, Jan Petzold, Anita Engels FAQs: Maike Nicolai 5.2: Stefan Aykut, Alexander Bassen, Jürgen Beyer, Michael Brüggemann, Timo Busch, Emilie d’Amico, Anita Engels, Thomas Frisch, Eduardo Reviewers Gresse, Lars Guenther, Christopher Hedemann, Enric Bas, Jörn Behrens, Leonie Färber, Gregory Johannes Jarke-Neuert, Matthew Johnson, Andreas Flato, Pierre Friedlingstein, Oliver Geden, Sue Lange, Christopher Pavenstädt, Grischa Perino, Grimmond, Jim Hall, Franziska Hanf, Peter Haugan, Jan Petzold, Junis Sander, Jürgen Scheffran, Felix Gabriele Hegerl, Charlotte Huch, Kerstin Jantke, Schenuit, Martin Wickel, Antje Wiener, Jan Wilkens, Andreas
Recommended publications
  • The Digital-Led New Normal: Revised Labour Market Outlook for 2022
    The Digital-Led New Normal: Research by The Information and Communications Technology Council This project is funded in part by the Government of Canada’s Sectoral Initiatives program Preface ICTC is a not-for-profit, national centre of expertise for strengthening Canada’s digital advantage in a global economy. Through trusted research, practical policy advice, and creative capacity-building programs, ICTC fosters globally competitive Canadian industries enabled by innovative and diverse digital talent. In partnership with a vast network of industry leaders, academic partners, and policy makers from across Canada, ICTC has empowered a robust and inclusive digital economy for over 25 years. To cite this report: Ivus, Maryna; Kotak, Akshay; McLaughlin, Ryan. The Digital-Led New Normal: Revised Labour Market Outlook for 2022. Information and Communications Technology Council (August 2020). Ottawa, Canada. Researched and written by Maryna Ivus (Manager, Labour Market Research), Akshay Kotak (Senior Economist & Research Analyst), and Ryan McLaughlin (Senior Economist & Research Analyst), with generous support from Alexandra Cutean (Senior Director, Research & Policy), Rob Davidson (Director, Data Analytics), Chris Herron (Junior Research Analyst), and the ICTC Research & Policy team. The opinions and interpretations in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Government of Canada. Abstract This report serves as an update and addendum to ICTC’s Digital Talent Outlook 2023 report released in 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Brand ID Solutions Broadcast and Product Design
    Brand ID Solutions Broadcast and Product Design 404-254-0496 email; [email protected] URL: http://www.studiob3.info FB: https://www.facebook.com/pages/Studiob3/104731049570283 LinkedIn : http://www.linkedin.com/in/carlbradford3 Definition/Examples Page Brand Identity A brand is the identity of a specific product, service, or business. A brand can take many forms, including a name, sign, symbol, color combination or slogan. The word brand began simply as a way to tell one person’s cattle from another by means of a hot iron stamp. A legally protected brand name is called a trademark. The word brand has continued to evolve to encompass identity - it affects the personality of a product, company or service. Brand Extension The process of exploring brand extensions represents a reasoned approach for selecting new categories a company might enter with their brands. Inherent in this process is the identification and decision of answering the question “What business are we in”? The heart of brand extension research is the effort to identify what business the brand is in from the perspective of the consumer. The objective of every brand extension research study is to uncover and articulate this definition of the business of the brand hidden in the mind of the consumer! Project Contents Page Section A CNN CNN Sports Illustrated 04 - 09 The Weather Channel 10 - 23 CBS News Network 24 - 29 CNN Sports Illustrated Promax BDA Silver and Bronze Brand Identity Standards Team Awards 1996 Broadcast Design Excellence, Brand Extension Show Opens, Promotional show Opens and Bumps. Product Design Gold, Silver and Bronze Set Design Executions Team Awards 1997 Broadcast Design Excellence, Show Opens, Promotional show Opens and Bumps.
    [Show full text]
  • A Semiotic Analysis of the Rhetoric of President Donald J. Trump
    University of Tennessee at Chattanooga UTC Scholar Student Research, Creative Works, and Honors Theses Publications 5-2021 Building a (great) wall: a semiotic analysis of the rhetoric of President Donald J. Trump Lauren Gilmore University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.utc.edu/honors-theses Part of the Rhetoric Commons Recommended Citation Gilmore, Lauren, "Building a (great) wall: a semiotic analysis of the rhetoric of President Donald J. Trump" (2021). Honors Theses. This Theses is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Research, Creative Works, and Publications at UTC Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of UTC Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Building a (Great) Wall: A Semiotic Analysis of the Rhetoric of President Donald J. Trump Lauren Gilmore Departmental Honors Thesis The University of Tennessee at Chattanooga English: Rhetoric and Professional Writing Examination Date: April 9, 2021 Dr. Lauren Ingraham Dr. Rik Hunter Professor of English Associate Professor of English Thesis Director Department Examiner Dr. Jeremy Strickler Assistant Professor of Political Science and Public Service Department Examiner Table of Contents INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................1 LITERATURE REVIEW ..........................................................................................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • The New Digital Age Introduction
    CONTENTS Advance praise for The New Digital Age Introduction CHAPTER 1 Our Future Selves CHAPTER 2 The Future of Identity, Citizenship and Reporting CHAPTER 3 The Future of States CHAPTER 4 The Future of Revolution CHAPTER 5 The Future of Terrorism CHAPTER 6 The Future oF Conflict, Combat and Intervention CHAPTER 7 The Future of Reconstruction Conclusion Acknowledgments Notes Index 2 Introduction The Internet is among the few things humans have built that they don’t truly understand. What began as a means of electronic information transmission— room-sized computer to room-sized computer—has transformed into an omnipresent and endlessly multifaceted outlet for human energy and expression. It is at once intangible and in a constant state of mutation, growing larger and more complex with each passing second. It is a source for tremendous good and potentially dreadful evil, and we’re only just beginning to witness its impact on the world stage. The Internet is the largest experiment involving anarchy in history. Hundreds of millions of people are, each minute, creating and consuming an untold amount of digital content in an online world that is not truly bound by terrestrial laws. This new capacity for free expression and free movement of information has generated the rich virtual landscape we know today. Think of all the websites you’ve ever visited, all the e-mails you’ve sent and stories you’ve read online, all the facts you’ve learned and ctions you’ve encountered and debunked. Think of every relationship forged, every journey planned, every job found and every dream born, nurtured and implemented through this platform.
    [Show full text]
  • Short-Term Ordinance Sent to City Council
    SMIBEl PUBLIC island PO Week of April 26-May 2,2001 SANIBEL & CAPTIVA, FLORIDA VOLUME 28, NUMBER 17, 28 PAGES 75 CENTS PLANTING BEAUTY DELINQUENT Short-term ordinance TAX NOTICES sent to city council AT LEFT: Beginning next week, the By Pete Bishop the law clearer and easier to Helping to Island Reporter will pub- Staff writer enforce. celebrate lish the delinquent tax Recommended changes to the Earth Day, notices provided by the In front of another full house at current ordinance, which states Sanibel MacKenzie Hall Tuesday, the Beautification Lee County Tax that dwelling units outside the Committee Collector's Office. In Sanibel Planning Commission resort housing district cannot be leaders plant addition to publication in unanimously decided to recom- rented for less than four consecu- bushes and the Island Reporter, the mend that city council adopt flowers on Cape Coral Daily Breeze changes to the city's short-term t> See Ordinance one of the and the Lehigh Acres rental ordinance meant to make page 20 four corner Citizen, the notices will islands at the be available at numerous Causeway/ locations throughout Lee Lindgren/ County including all Ordinance tested at hearing Periwinkle offices of the Lee County intersection Tax Collector, special Saturday newspaper racks and all Properties in Paradise could face $14,000 fine morning. offices of the Breeze Corp. including Cape By Pete Bishop Territo will answer when he rules Staff writer on the City of Sanibel vs Properties Photo 1 Michael Coral, Lehigh Acres, Pistdla North Fort Myers, Fort in Paradise case. Myers Beach, Sanibel Is advertising offering rentals of Arguments by Sanibel City Island, Pine Island and less than a month proof of a viola- Gaspanlla Island.
    [Show full text]
  • EXHIBITG My Family TV- KLEI Program Schedule
    EXHIBITG My Family TV- KLEI Program Schedule HAWAII TIME Time Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Time 12:00 AM 12:00 AM 12:30 AM 12:30 AM Movie Movie Movie Movie Movie Movie Movie 1:00AM 1:00AM 1:30AM 1:30AM 2:00AM Paid Program Paid Program Paid Program Paid Program Paid Program Paid Program Paid Program 2:00AM 2:30AM Paid Program Paid Program Paid Program Paid Program Paid Program Paid Program The Jewish Jesus 2:30AM 3:00AM Paid Program Paid Program Paid Program Paid Program Paid Program Paid Program Paid Program 3:00AM 3:30AM Paid Program Paid Program . Paid Program Paid Program Paid Program Paid Program Paid Program 3:30AM 4:00AM Doug Kaufmann Know The Cause Paid Program Paid Program 4:00AM 4:30AM Doug Kaufmann Know The Cause Paid Program Paid Program 4:30AM 5:00AM Paid Program Paid Program Paid Program Paid Program Paid Program Paid Program Paid Program 5:00AM 5:30AM Financial Solutions With Todd Coontz Paid Program . Paid Program 5:30AM Irs Supernatural 6:00AM Lighthouse Changing Lives Paid Program Paid Program Paid Program Paid Program '6:00AM wlth Sid Roth 6:30AM Joshua 24:15 Paid Program Paid Program 6:30AM 7:00AM Native Ways Latitudes Native Ways Latitudes Native Ways Rhema Church Lighthouse 7:00AM lfs Supernatural with Sid 7:30AM Talk Story Hawaii Truly Plnoy Talk Story Hawaii Truly Pinoy Talk Story Hawaii New Zoo Review 7:30AM Roth Ariel & Zoey and Ell 8:00AM Curiosity Quest Ell Real Life 101 Ell Beta Records Ell Passport to Explore Ell New Zoo Review 8:00AM .
    [Show full text]
  • Morning Glories Cottage Moves on Down the Road Janes
    t f 0' 1 " I' ' ' "' " ' ' "' '"''" i IT! C island C!r- ft i b!::..!_ 33957 PORTE Week of April 5-11, 2001 SANIBEL & CAPTIVA, FLORIDA VOLUME 28, NUMBER 14, 28 PAGES 75 CENTS Janes: More Sonibei Cares Boats Island group raises causeway $175,000 for Children's Hospital's new emergency center. discussion —See page 2 By Pete Bishop collide Staff writer Blind Pass doses By Mason Laderer Although consultants for the Lee County Department of Blind Pass, in what seems Staff writer to be an April Fool's joke Transportation (DOT) offered a by nature gone horribly Two people were transported to rebuttal to questions surrounding wrong, has closed again. Lee Memorial Hospital by Lee its plans to rebuild two Sanibel County EMS after two boats col- Causeway bridges at the Lee —See page 3 lided early Tuesday morning near County Board of County the Sanibel Causeway. Commissioners (BOCC) City manager search According to reports, the two Management and Planning meet- boats, a 20-foot Boston Whaler ing Monday, Commissioner Bob Sanibel City Council moves and a 25-foot Aquasport charter ns 'Mirhni'l Phtrllu Junes persuaded the board to dis- forward in seeking a new LEFT: The 25-foot Aquasport -charter shows evidence of cuss the issue further before plac- city manager. Former E> See Boats ing the matter on its regular agen- Sanibel City Manager being hit. RIGHT: The 20-foot Boston Whaler ran aground page 2 near Dixie Beach Boulevard. da! Bernie Murphy expresses On Jan. 30. DOT asked the interest in the job. commission to forward plans that included rebuilding the two —See page 4 bridges closest to Sanibel to the U.S.
    [Show full text]