DOCSLIB.ORG

Summary of International Travel to the United States MARCH 2016 and YEAR to DATE (Revised) (Based on Country of Residence) Visitor Arrivals Program (I-94 Data)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Summary of International Travel to the United States MARCH 2016 AND YEAR TO DATE (revised) (Based on Country of Residence) Visitor Arrivals Program (I-94 Data) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration National Travel and Tourism Office Website: http://travel.trade.gov INTRODUCTION Purpose and Objectives The National Travel and Tourism Office (NTTO) is required to effectively provide travel data to public and private industry users. To fulfill this requirement, NTTO produces the Summary of International Travelers to the United States. The Summary is the official federal government source of reporting international arrivals to the United States. The report defines the size, select characteristics, and travel patterns of inbound international visitor arrivals coming into the United States from world regions and countries based primarily on residency, but also available on country of citizenship. These data are tabulated and published monthly by NTTO. There are no other federal government or private sector sources for these data. Methodology This report integrates the volume of inbound international visitors to the United States from residents of other countries, using three U.S. and international government sources: the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS)/U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 1-94 program data, Statistics Canada's International Travel Survey (ITS) and Banco de Mexico travel data. The count of overseas visitors to the United States is based on DHS/CBP Non-Immigrant 1-94 Arrival/Departure Records. On April 30, 2013, Phase 2 of the I-94 Automation project was implemented. Most (approximately two-thirds) of the I-94’s were automated in 2010 during Phase 1 of the project with the conversion of the I-94W paper-based document system to an electronic record system together with the implementation of the Electronic System for Travel Authorization (ESTA) program. Citizens of Visa Waiver Program countries were affected by ESTA and the rollout of the ‘e-I94W,’ specifically for the WB and WT visa types. By April 30, 2013, the remaining I-94 records (approximately one-third), for citizens of countries requiring a visa, were automated in Phase 2. Beginning in 2014 I-94 arrivals data include a methodology change where the country of citizenship is used as a substitute for those I-94 records with missing country of residence data. Please note that I-94 arrivals data sets are based on the same criteria, including the same visitor types and the ‘one night or more’ definition of a traveler. I-94 arrivals monthly data are released initially as ‘preliminary,’ with these data subject to revisions that may be possible with improved solutions and/or sources discovered. I-94 arrivals monthly data are subject to revisions for up to 36 months following the initial data release. DHS/CBP provides NTTO’s contractor with 1-94 program (raw) data monthly. To account for visits (arrivals) to the United States, NTTO only selects 1-94 records bearing certain visa types: i Business: Pleasure (continued): B-1 Visa Holders-Business GT WB Visa Waiver-Business GMT Guam Visa Waiver-Tourist GB CPL GMB Guam Visa Waiver-Business SBP I & I1 Visa Holders-Foreign Information Media CP Country code not equal 584 ‘Cuba” E-1 Visa Holders-Treaty Trader E-2 Visa Holders-Treaty Investor Student: M-1 Visa Holders-Vocational Students Pleasure: M-2 Visa Holders-Family Members of Vocational Students B-2 Visa Holders-Pleasure F-1 Visa Holders-Students WT Visa Waiver-Pleasure F-2 Visa Holders-Family Members of Students To comply with globally accepted international tourism definitions and classifications (United Nations World Tourism Organization/UNWTO), a traveler must spend one or more nights in the United States for a period that does not exceed 12 months to be classified a visitor to the United States. The purpose of the trip must be for pleasure, business (i.e., conduct business meetings and consultations, attend conventions and conferences or negotiate contracts) or study. In addition, all visitors are recognized primarily by residency. Visits based on country of citizenship are also provided. The aggregate count of Mexican visitors to the United States is based on monthly counts from Banco de Mexico which are classified as ‘border’ travelers (1 + night) and ‘tourists.’ However, NTTO does use the DHS ‘1-94 air only’ count to determine Mexican air travelers to the United States. The count of Canadian resident travelers to the United States is provided by Statistics Canada's International Visitor Survey. The inbound arrivals from the Survey are reported in the Summary but are subject to monthly revisions by Statistics Canada for up to 36 months following the initial data release. Visa Waiver Pilot Program (VWPP)/Parolee (April 30-October 30, 2000) The Visa Waiver Pilot Program (VWPP) expired at midnight on the evening of April 30, 2000/morning of May 1, 2000. With the statutory expiration of the VWPP, DHS/Office of Immigration Statistics (OIS) began paroling into the United States for up to 90 days, under terms and conditions almost identical to those required under the VWPP, those travelers who otherwise would have been eligible for entry under the VWPP. These measures were undertaken to avoid substantial disruption to international travel and commerce. A parolee is defined as an alien, appearing to be inadmissible to the inspecting officer (e.g., lack of a valid visa), allowed into the United States for urgent humanitarian reasons or when that alien's entry is determined to be for significant public benefit. Parole does not constitute a formal admission to the United States and confers temporary status only, requiring parolees to leave when the conditions supporting their parole cease to exist. Therefore, parolees are not classified as tourists or visitors for business or pleasure. i On October 30, 2000, the Visa Waiver Permanent Program Act made permanent the Visa Waiver Pilot Program. On October 31, 2000, DHS/OIS resumed admitting visitors for business as WBs and visitors for pleasure as WTs. The permanent program permits nationals from participating countries to apply for admission to the United States for ninety (90) days or less as visitors for business or pleasure without first obtaining a nonimmigrant visa. Non-Tourist Visitor Counts Excluded Other "non-tourist" visitor counts reported in DHS 1-94 program data, such as transiting passengers on the way to another country destination, airline crew members, official diplomats, temporary and religious workers, members of the foreign media, press and radio, are excluded from the Summary report because they are not by definition considered an international visitor to the United States. REPORT LIMITATIONS Trend Line Analysis Over time, several system changes have occurred to collecting, processing and reporting the visitor arrivals data for the United States. System changes to select data make some elements of this data base incompatible with arrival statistics produced and reported in prior years. When using this report in a time series, the user should pay close attention to past report introductions to assess comparability issues. Years where slight incompatibilities have occurred are discussed below. Unfortunately, there is no way to adjust past data as DHS does not store the raw data for extended periods of time. And there is no way to determine the impact of these changes. Therefore, each year’s counts are the best data available at the time it is released. Additionally, many official country designations change over time, which may affect time series analysis. Mexican Arrivals to the United States Prior to 2010, the United States only reported monthly Mexican tourist arrivals who visited the U.S. 'interior', beyond the 40 kilometer-25-mile border zone. The source of these data is the I094A semi-automated entry document system in use at U.S. land border ports. Starting in 2010, NTTO reports all Mexican travelers to the United States, monthly, using estimates from Banco de Mexico. Banco counts are subject to periodic revisions. Air travel counts, however, are derived from DHS/CBP 1-94 records. Canadian Arrivals Data on Canadian arrivals are derived from Statistics Canada's International Travel Survey. NTTO uses Statistic Canada's data as the official visitor estimates. These data reflect the number of Canadian residents visiting the United States overnight or longer. The Canadian arrival data are subject to monthly revisions by Statistics Canada for up to 36 months following the initial data release. Contact the National Travel and Tourism Office to obtain revised Canadian monthly and total arrivals data. ii China/Peoples Republic of China (PRC) and Hong Kong Starting in 1996, NTTO began reporting China PRC and Hong Kong as one country due to the re-unification. However, NTTO will continue to sub-set Hong Kong if Hong Kong residency data are reported by DHS/CBP. The Hong Kong data should be considered as an estimate in all years subsequent to 1996. Address While in U.S., a/k/a First Intended Address of Non-Resident Arrivals by Country of Residence During entry processing, CBP officers ask visitors to the United States to identify the address (number and street), U.S. city and state, they will be visiting while in the country. Currently, DHS/CBP only provides NTTO’s contractor with the U.S. state (not city) the traveler is visiting, as indicated in the arrival record. The data are found in the First Intended Address of Non-Resident Arrivals by Country of Residence tables (G.1 and G.2, H .1 and H.2, I.1 and I.2). While these data can be a useful barometer of the visitor’s intention, it is limited to a one destination response. Since the average overseas traveler visits 1.4 U.S. states (in 2013), the I-94 tables will understate the total number of international travelers that visited any given U.S.
Recommended publications
  • Statement on Behalf of the National Restaurant Association

    Statement on Behalf of the National Restaurant Association

    Statement On behalf of the National Restaurant Association HEARING: VACATION NATION: HOW TOURISM BENEFITS OUR ECONOMY BEFORE: SUBCOMMITTEE ON COMMERCE, MANUFACTURING AND TRADE ENERGY & COMMERCE COMMITTEE U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES BY: HUDSON RIEHLE SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT, RESEARCH & KNOWLEDGE GROUP NATIONAL RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION DATE: MAY 7, 2013 National Restaurant Association “Vacation Nation: How Tourism Benefits our Economy” Page 2 Chairman Terry, Ranking Member Schakowsky, and members of the subcommittee, thank you for this opportunity to testify before you today on behalf of the National Restaurant Association. I am Hudson Riehle, senior vice president of the Association’s research and knowledge group. The National Restaurant Association is the leading trade association for the restaurant and foodservice industry. Our mission is to help our members establish customer loyalty, build rewarding careers, and achieve financial success. RESTAURANTS: AMERICA WORKS HERE As we sit here today, the nation’s nearly 1 million restaurant locations are starting to gear up for what we hope will be a strong summer season. While our members are looking forward to increased summer sales, we’re especially happy about the hundreds of thousands of jobs we will create because of those sales. At the National Restaurant Association, we use a simple phrase to tell our industry’s story: “America Works Here.” Restaurants are job creators. Despite being an industry of predominately small businesses, the restaurant industry is the nation’s second-largest private- sector employer. With more than 13.1 million employees, the nation’s nearly 980,000 restaurants employ about one in 10 working Americans. About half of all adults have worked in the restaurant industry at some point in their lives, and one in three got their first job in a restaurant.
  • Travel Surveys

    Travel Surveys

    A1D10: Committee on Travel Survey Methods Chairman: Elaine Murakami, Federal Highway Administration Travel Surveys ROBERT GRIFFITHS, Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments A. J. RICHARDSON, University of Sydney, Australia MARTIN E. H. LEE-GOSSELIN, Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada Travel surveys will continue to be one of the most important ways of obtaining the critical information needed for transportation planning and decision making in the new millennium. Not only will these surveys be used to gather current information about the demographic, socioeconomic, and trip-making characteristics of individuals and households, but they will also be used to further our understanding of travel in relation to the choice, location, and scheduling of daily activities. This will enable us to enhance our travel forecasting methods and improve our ability to predict changes in daily travel patterns in response to current social and economic trends and new investments in transportation systems and services. These travel surveys will also play a role in evaluating changes in transportation supply and regulation as they occur. In the last half century, travel survey methods have undergone tremendous change. Originally, travel surveys were conducted primarily through face-to-face interviews, typically conducted in respondents’ homes or at intercept points along major roadways and transit routes or at major transportation nodes. The surveys produced high-quality data that provided a sound basis for the development of the first generation of travel forecasting models. Significant changes in modern urban lifestyles, however, made the large-scale use of traditional face-to-face survey methods extremely costly. In response to these societal changes, travel survey methods have adapted to better fit contemporary lifestyles and have become much more economical to conduct.
  • Regional Travel Survey Final Report

    Regional Travel Survey Final Report

    Atlanta Regional Commission Regional Travel Survey Final Report November 2011 206 Wild Basin Rd., Suite A-300 (512) 306-9065 Austin, Texas 78746 fax (512) 306-9077 Contact: Jeff Livingston, Project Manager www.ptvnustats.com Project conducted by PTV NuStats in association with GeoStats Table of Contents Executive Summary i Survey Methods 1 Objectives and Approach 1 Survey Design 2 Sample Design 4 Data Collection 11 Data Processing, Coding, and Correction 16 Response Rates 26 GPS Subsample 27 Data Weighting and Expansion 38 Household Weight 39 Person Weight 42 Limitations of the Survey 43 Survey Results 44 Household Characteristics 44 Travel Behavior 55 Appendix A: Recruitment CATI Survey 60 Appendix B: Recruitment WEB Survey 83 Appendix C: Retrieval CATI Survey 106 Appendix D: Retrieval WEB Survey 121 Appendix E: Interviewer Training Manual 131 Appendix F: Final Data Matrix 161 Appendix G: Recruitment Item Unweighted Frequencies 182 Appendix H: Retrieval Item Unweighted Frequencies 192 Appendix I: Survey Materials 196 Appendix J: GPS Materials 201 List of Tables and Figures Table 1: Overall Completed Survey Summary i Table 2: Participation Statistics by GPS Sample Type i Figure 1: Household Travel Survey Study Area 1 Table 4: Distribution of Households in Study Area 4 Figure 2: Sampled Household Locations (Map of ARC Region) 5 Table 5: Stratification Scheme 6 Figure 3: Area Type Stratification 7 Table 6: Distribution of Area Types 7 Figure 4: Transit Oversampling Area 8 Table 7: Socioeconomic Stratification 9 Table 8: Target County Distribution
  • COVID-19 Impacts and Recovery Strategies: the Case of the Hospitality Industry in Spain

    COVID-19 Impacts and Recovery Strategies: the Case of the Hospitality Industry in Spain

    sustainability Article COVID-19 Impacts and Recovery Strategies: The Case of the Hospitality Industry in Spain José Miguel Rodríguez-Antón * and María del Mar Alonso-Almeida Business Organization Department, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 10 September 2020; Accepted: 13 October 2020; Published: 16 October 2020 Abstract: The health crisis caused by the pandemic COVID-19 has been of such magnitude that the drop-off in economic and tourist activity in most countries is generating an economic crisis with consequences that are still difficult to measure. The present work analyses the origins and evolution of the coronavirus pandemic and reviews the literature related to the impacts and recovery strategies that were implemented in previous crisis situations affecting the hotel industry. In order to focus the study on one country, Spain was selected based on tourism indicators, the importance of tourism for this country and the importance of Spain as a leader in international tourist destinations. The influence of the pandemic on the Spanish tourism sector and, more specifically, on its hospitality industry is explored in depth. In addition, the main initiatives to support the tourism and hospitality sector that have been undertaken at the global, European and national levels are highlighted and, finally, the response and recovery strategies of the five largest Spanish hotel chains to guarantee a COVID-19-free stay in their facilities and to recover the accommodation activity are discussed. Keywords: hotels; COVID-19; economic crisis; pandemics; response strategy; tourism; strategy management; health economics 1. Introduction COVID-19—the acronym for coronavirus disease 2019—is an infectious disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
  • Examining the Impact of Visa Restrictions on International Tourist Flows Using Panel Data

    Examining the Impact of Visa Restrictions on International Tourist Flows Using Panel Data

    1 Examining the impact of visa restrictions on international tourist flows using panel data Andrés Artal-Tur a,b, Vicente J. Pallardó-López b, Francisco Requena-Silvente b, 1 a Department of Economics, Technical University of Cartagena, C\ Real 3, 30201, Cartagena, Spain b Institute of International Economics (IEI-UV), Avda dels Tarongers s/n, 46022, Valencia, Spain Abstract Tourism has become a major global industry, with world arrivals reaching 1 billion numbers in 2012. However, important barriers to travel still exist internationally. Using newly panel data we explore the effects of visa restrictions on international tourist flows in a theory-grounded gravity model. We find a robust, causal negative impact of visa restrictions on international flows, improving accuracy of estimates in the literature. By destination, the detrimental impact of this type of barrier is observed for tourists going to developing countries, but not for those to developed ones. By country of origin, the impact of visa restrictions appears to be the same for tourists coming from developed and developing countries. These findings have important consequences in policy terms for tourism management at a regional level. Keywords: international tourism, visa restrictions, panel data, gravity model, developing countries. Acknowledgements: This document has been produced with the financial assistance of the European Union within the context of the FEMISE program (FEM35-04-CP2011). The contents of this document are the sole responsibility of the authors and can under no circumstances be regarded as reflecting the position of the European Union. The authors also acknowledge financial support from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (project ECO 2011-27619/ECON) and Generalitat Valenciana (project Prometeo/2011/098).
  • 9Hotel Operations

    9Hotel Operations

    9 HOTEL OPERATIONS UNIT MENU Grammar: present perfect Vocabulary: housekeeping supplies, refurbishment, checking a hotel bill Professional skills: checking out Case study: choose a contractor Aims and objectives Vocabulary In this lesson students will: HOUSEKEEPING SUPPLIES • read part of an interview with an executive Exercise 4, page 77 housekeeper for a luxury hotel in Malaysia Elicit the meaning of supplies before referring • study vocabulary relating to housekeeping students to the lists of words. Ask students to match supplies the words to the categories, either alone or in pairs, • listen to a conversation about hotel housekeeping and encourage them to use a dictionary. Check Reading answers as a class, checking meaning and pronunciation as useful. HOUSEKEEPING 1 b 2 d 3 e 4 f 5 c 6 a Exercise 1, page 76 Focus students’ attention on the photo and elicit what it shows (sun loungers with towels ready for guests’ EXTRA ACTIVITY use). Find out if anyone has worked in a hotel and Students discuss what sort of bed linen is elicit the meaning of the word housekeeping before commonly used in hotels and what they tend to asking students to decide what jobs an executive use at home. housekeeper (EHK) does. Allow time for students to compare answers in pairs but do not check answers Grammar at this stage. PRESENT PERFECT Students’ own answers. Exercise 5, page 77 Exercise 2, page 76 Focus students’ attention on the Grammar box. Allow Students read the extracts, checking their answers to them time to read the information and ask any Exercise 1. Round up by asking if they would want to questions before referring to the questions in be an EHK and why/why not.
  • The Travel Advice As an Inhibiting Factor of Tourist Movement

    The Travel Advice As an Inhibiting Factor of Tourist Movement

    ORIGINALNI ČLANAK UDC 338.48:316 2016. Fakultet za sport i turizam, Novi Sad, TIMS Acta 10, 13-26 DOI: 10.5937/timsact10-9902 THE TRAVEL ADVICE AS AN INHIBITING FACTOR OF TOURIST MOVEMENT Dimitrios Mylonopoulos, Technological Education Institute of Piraeus, Athens Polyxeni Moira, Technological Education Institute of Piraeus, Athens Aikaterina Kikilia, Technological Education Institute of Piraeus, Athens Abstract Tourism is significantly affected by unpredictable and uncertain factors such as the occurrence of a terrorist attack, an epidemic outbreak or a natural disaster, etc. The impact of these phenomena on the tourist movement of the country or the place where the event occurred is aggravated by the way it is presented by the media both locally and internationally. The adverse climate gets worse by the issuance of travel advice that usually accompanies such phenomena and has the effect of limiting or even halting tourist flows. In order to identify and study the different types of travel advice that have been issued during international tourism crisis incidents, an internet search was carried out using keywords. Moreover, a study on the travel advice issued by major tourists’ origin states, as the USA, Australia, Canada, Germany, the United Kingdom, etc. was carried out. Incidents (terrorist attacks, epidemics, natural disasters) which had a great impact on tourism were then selected. In addition, the issuance of travel advice, their different issuing authorities, the classification level and the impact on the tourism of the country or the place in question were examined. An analysis of the reaction and the instructions of major international organizations (World Health Organization, World Tourism Organization) concerning the management of such crises, directly or indirectly affecting tourism, were also analyzed.
  • International Tourists' Souvenir Purchasing Behavior Soyoung Kim Iowa State University

    International Tourists' Souvenir Purchasing Behavior Soyoung Kim Iowa State University

    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 1997 International tourists' souvenir purchasing behavior Soyoung Kim Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Leisure Studies Commons, Marketing Commons, and the Recreation Business Commons Recommended Citation Kim, Soyoung, "International tourists' souvenir purchasing behavior " (1997). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 12220. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/12220 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfihn master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter &ce, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps.
  • 2001 NHTS Summary of Travel Trends Table of Contents

    2001 NHTS Summary of Travel Trends Table of Contents

    Summary of Travel Trends 2001 National Household Travel Survey Pat S. Hu U. S. Department of Center for Transportation Analysis Transportation Oak Ridge National Laboratory And Federal Highway Administration Timothy R. Reuscher MacroSys Research and Technology December 2004 DOCUMENT AVAILABILITY Reports produced after January 1, 1996, are generally available free via the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Information Bridge. Web site http://www.osti.gov/bridge Reports produced before January 1, 1996, may be purchased by members of the public from the following source. National Technical Information Service 5285 Port Royal Road Springfield, VA 22161 Telephone 703-605-6000 (1-800-553-6847) TDD 703-487-4639 Fax 703-605-6900 E-mail [email protected] Web site http://www.ntis.gov/support/ordernowabout.htm Reports are available to DOE employees, DOE contractors, Energy Technology Data Exchange (ETDE) representatives, and International Nuclear Information System (INIS) representatives from the following source. Office of Scientific and Technical Information P.O. Box 62 Oak Ridge, TN 37831 Telephone 865-576-8401 Fax 865-576-5728 E-mail [email protected] Web site http://www.osti.gov/contact.html This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof.
  • National Travel Attitudes Study (NTAS) Collects Data on the Attitudes of Individuals Aged 16 and Over Across England

    National Travel Attitudes Study (NTAS) Collects Data on the Attitudes of Individuals Aged 16 and Over Across England

    Statistical Release 28 January 2021 National Travel Attitudes Study: Wave 4 (Final) About this release Increased importance of walking and cycling The coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic The National Travel Attitudes had a substantial impact on active travel. Pre-pandemic walkers and cyclists Study (NTAS) is an online and When interviewed between May and telephone survey which covers September 2020, 34% of cyclists reported walk more than responses from individuals aged 38% to cycle more and 38% of those who walk before pandemic 16 and over in England, drawn from people who have previously as a means of transport reported to walk cycle more than responded to the National Travel more than before the outbreak of the 34% before pandemic Survey (NTS). coronavirus. This release covers the fnal Decline in trip rates during version of the fourth NTAS, coronavirus pandemic Trip rates compared Wave 4, and centres around During the frst sampling period (May- with NTS 2019 travel attitudes in relation to the July 2020), the average number of trips May-Jul 2020 coronavirus pandemic and travel to visit friends and relatives fell by 59% restrictions. A provisional version -59% was published on October the 8th compared with data from the National 2020. The survey was conducted Travel Survey 2019. During the second Aug-Sep 2020 in two sampling stages, the frst sampling period (August-September one running from May till July 2020), the diference was less substantial, -36% 2020 and the second one running down 36% compared with the NTS 2019. from August till September 2020. May-Jul 2020 In total, 5,299 people completed NTAS Wave 4 respondents reported to go the survey.
  • Tourism Development Concept Paper

    Tourism Development Concept Paper

    TOURISM DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT PAPER TOURISM DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT PAPER 2 TOURISM DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT PAPER TOURISM DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT PAPER 3 TABLE OF CONTENT TABLE OF CONTENT ...................................................................................................................................... 3 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................... 4 SECTION I. GENERAL PROVISIONS.............................................................................................................. 5 CHAPTER 1. STATE AND TENDENCIES OF GLOBAL TOURISM GROWTH ................................................................ 5 CHAPTER 2. SOCIAL ECONOMIC CULTURAL ENVIRONMENTAL AND POLITICAL IMPLICATIONS OF TOURISM ............ 6 CHAPTER 3. GLOBAL TOURISM TRENDS AND FORECASTS.................................................................................. 7 SECTION II. CURRENT STATE OF TOURISM IN ARMENIA....................................................................... 10 SECTION III. OBSTACLES AND CHALLENGES OF TOURISM DEVELOPMENT IN ARMENIA............... 17 SECTION IV. STATE POLICY PRINCIPLES ................................................................................................. 19 CHAPTER 1. DESCRIPTION OF PRINCIPLES ...................................................................................................... 19 CHAPTER 2. VALUES.....................................................................................................................................
  • Travel Facilitation, Tourism and Growth

    Travel Facilitation, Tourism and Growth

    OECD Tourism Trends and Policies 2014 © OECD 2014 PART I Chapter 2 Travel facilitation, tourism and growth This chapter considers the impact on travel and tourism of visa and entry policies which control the movement of people across national borders. It is based on recent workbytheOECDTourismCommitteeanddrawsoncasestudymaterialfrom OECD and partner countries. The chapter considers the potential for smarter approaches to support tourism and economic growth, while simultaneously maintaining the integrity and security of national borders. The issues and challenges policy makers face in developing and implementing policy in this area are outlined. The different approaches governments have adopted, and their impacts, are also highlighted. A number of policy considerations are then discussed, to inform policy making and contribute to the current debate on travel facilitation. The statistical data for Israel are supplied by and under the responsibility of the relevant Israeli authorities. The use of such data by the OECD is without prejudice to the status of the Golan Heights, East Jerusalem and Israeli settlements in the West Bank under the terms of international law. 47 I.2. TRAVEL FACILITATION, TOURISM AND GROWTH International travel and tourism depends on the ability of people to travel freely from where they live to their destination, crossing borders and entering other countries. However, a range of factors influence travel mobility and limit the free movement of people, with adverse consequences for tourism and economic growth. Safety and security, customs and immigration, access infrastructure and aviation regulations are just some of the issues which can influence the freedom to travel. Travel facilitation focuses on reducing these impediments and making travel simple and straightforward.