DOCSLIB.ORG

March 19, 2020 Agenda

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
March 19, 2020 Agenda REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES RVS EDUCATION CENTRE 2651 CHINOOK WINDS DR. SW AIRDRIE, AB MARCH 19, 2020 10:00 a.m. Regular Board Meeting AGENDA 1. Call to Order 2. Approval of Agenda 3. In Camera Meeting 4. Motions Arising from In Camera 5. Approval of Minutes a) Regular Board Meeting – March 5, 2020 6. Delegations a) Chrissy Craig – Langdon Community Association Chair 7. Superintendent’s Report 8. Chair’s Report/Correspondence 9. Committee Reports a) Planning Committee b) Other 10. Trustee Reports 11. New Business 12. Adjournment This unofficial agenda is subject to change and is not official until approved at the Board meeting. SUPERINTENDENT REPORT REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES MARCH 19, 2020 AGENDA ACTION 1. Capital Plan Submission Directive 2. Kathyrn/ Irricana/ Beiseker and Rural Area Accommodation Plan Directive 3. Locally Developed Courses Approval Directive 4. COVID-19 Response Update Information 5. Edwin Parr RVS Nominee Announcement Information Greg Luterbach Superintendent of Schools DIRECTIVE FOR ACTION TO: THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM: THE SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS Item: 2021 – 2023 Capital Priorities Date of Meeting: March 19, 2020 Background: Each school division in Alberta is required to submit their proposed list of capital request, in order of priority, by April 1st of each calendar year. Current Status: See below for the Capital Priorities proposed by RVS Administration for the 2021-2023 budget years. See attachment for supporting information. Proposed Build Out Type of Site Capital Project Community Priority Capacity Project Readiness 2021 BUDGET YEAR Bow Valley High 1400 1 Cochrane Addition Existing School (+700 addition) New 2 Airdrie K-9 900 Airdrie Existing Construction New 3 Cochrane K-5 600 Cochrane 2020 Construction 2022 BUDGET YEAR New 4 Airdrie K-9 900 Airdrie TBD Construction New 5 Chestermere K-9 900 Chestermere TBD Construction New 6 Airdrie High School 1500 Airdrie TBD Construction New 7 Springbank K-9 900 Harmony TBD Construction Chestermere High New 8 1500 Chestermere TBD School Construction New 9 Langdon K-5 600 Langdon TBD Construction 2023 BUDGET YEAR New 10 Cochrane K-9 900 Cochrane TBD Construction New 11 Crossfield K-5 600 Crossfield TBD Construction New 12 Airdrie K-9 900 Airdrie TBD Construction New 13 Chestermere K-9 900 Chestermere TBD Construction DIRECTIVE FOR ACTION TO: THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM: THE SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS Alternatives: Alternative I: The Board of Trustees approve the 2021-2023 Capital Plan Priorities as presented, directing administration to submit the Capital Plan Priorities to Alberta Education. Alternative II: The Board of Trustees approve the 2021-2023 Capital Plan Priorities as amended and directs administration to submit the revised Capital Plan Priorities to Alberta Education. Recommendation: The Board of Trustees approve the 2021-2023 Capital Plan Priorities as presented, directing administration to submit the Capital Plan Priorities to Alberta Education. DIRECTIVE FOR ACTION TO: THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM: THE SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS Attachment 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Airdrie 8593 9227 9902 10516 11075 Difference 571 634 675 614 559 Cochrane/Westbrook/Bearspaw 4718 5006 5186 5450 5788 Difference 190 288 180 264 338 Chestermere/Indus/Langdon 4609 4800 5043 5111 5054 Difference 210 191 243 68 -57 Bragg Creek/Springbank 2151 2195 2148 2112 2050 Difference 49 44 -47 -36 -62 Beiseker/Kathyrn 518 493 480 443 458 Difference -16 -25 -13 -37 15 Crossfield 610 624 651 639 669 Difference 45 14 27 -12 30 Colonies 40 43 44 52 42 Difference -4 3 1 8 -10 CLCs 331 324 316 392 501 Difference -61 -7 -8 76 109 Total 21,570 22,712 23,770 24,715 25,637 (+4.7%) (+5.3%) (+4.7%) (+4.0%) (+3.7%) Bow Valley High School Year Enrolment Utilization 2019 739 89% 2020 820 98% 2021 935 112% 2022 1015 122% 2023 1115 133% 2024 1170 140% DIRECTIVE FOR ACTION TO: THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM: THE SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS DIRECTIVE FOR ACTION TO: THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM: THE SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS DIRECTIVE FOR ACTION TO: THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM: THE SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS Item: Kathyrn/Irricana/Beiseker and Rural Area Accommodation Plan Date of Meeting: March 19, 2020 Background Kathyrn School and Beiseker Community School are in the northeast area of Rocky View Schools. Kathyrn School accommodates K-Gr. 8, while Beiseker Community School serves K-Gr. 12 students. Enrolments at Kathyrn School have been steady for the last four years, though not strong. Kathyrn School has a 52 per cent utilization rate, which is not expected to increase unless accommodation changes are made. Enrolments also have been decreasing at Beiseker Community School, yet the school is still at a reasonable 79 per cent utilization. Kathyrn students feed into Beiseker Community School at Gr. 9. At the Oct. 31, 2019 regular meeting of the Board of Trustees, the following motion was passed: As per the motion, representation from both administration and the Board of Trustees, held a stakeholder consultation session on January 22, 2020. Close to two hundred members of the public attended this meeting and gave their feedback. Please see Attachment A for the presentation given and Attachment B for a summary of the feedback. Additionally, public was welcome to come forward as a delegation to the Board of Trustees on February 6, 2020. No one chose to present during this opportunity. In addition, approximately 17 emails were received from stakeholders related to information shared at the public consultation meeting. Current Status: The following were the proposals brought forward at the pubic meeting: Proposal 1: Extend the Kathyrn/Beiseker boundary down to Highway 564. Proposal 2: Extend Kathyrn/Beiseker boundary to Township Road 250 (McKnight extension). Proposal 3: Extend Kathyrn/Beiseker boundary to Highway #1 (not including Conrich). Proposal 4: Grade structure change. Proposal 5: No change. Keep boundaries and grade structure as status quo. DIRECTIVE FOR ACTION TO: THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM: THE SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS As discussed at the consultation meeting, each of the above proposals, except the status quo proposal, will increase the number of students to Kathyrn and Beiseker schools to varying degrees. Students in the proposed areas south of the current Kathyrn boundary are currently designated to East Lake, Chestermere Lake, and Chestermere High, so any boundary change made will impact these students. The feedback RVS received from the consultation meeting and emails was very diverse. It is for this reason, administration recommends that more discussion of detailed options needs to occur with the community. It’s recommended this occurs in the fall of 2020. Alternatives: Alternative I: The Board of Trustees directs administration to extend the attendance area of Kathyrn School (K-8) and Beiseker Community School (Gr9-12) to Highway 564. Alternative II: The Board of Trustees directs administration to extend the attendance area of Kathyrn School (K-8) and Beiseker Community School (Gr9-12) to Township Road 250 (McKnight extension). Alternative III: The Board of Trustees directs administration to extend the attendance area of Kathyrn School (K-8) and Beiseker Community School (Gr9-12) to Highway #1 (not including Conrich). Alternative IV The Board of Trustees directs administration to not make any changes to Kathyrn School or Beiseker Community School attendance area. Alternative V The Board of Trustees directs administration to not make any changes to Kathyrn School or Beiseker Community School attendance area and to hold another consultation meeting with stakeholders in the fall of 2020. Recommendation: The Board of Trustees directs administration to not make any changes to Kathyrn School or Beiseker Community School attendance area and to hold another consultation meeting with stakeholders in the fall of 2020. Student Accommodation Kathyrn, Irricana, Beiseker and Area Kindergarten – Grade 12 January 22, 2020 Agenda u Welcome & Introductions u Consultation process u Overview of Rocky View Schools u Purpose and Challenges u Options u Table Talk u Next Steps u Closing Level of Public Consultation Rocky View Schools RVS Enrolment and Capacity Purpose How does RVS best support rural families in their educational choices? How does RVS ensure both Kathyrn School and Beiseker School have enrolment that supports varied educational opportunities? Factors: 1. Some would say it would be preferable to have higher enrolments at Kathyrn and Beiseker schools to provide more options / choices while others appreciate the lowest/one of the lowest class size averages in RVS. 2. Irricana has an option to attend either Kathyrn or Beiseker. 3. Prairie Royal families are currently designated to East Lake and have option to attend Kathyrn. 4. Boundary for Kathyrn has a very odd perimeter, which is still based on decisions made over 20 years ago. Current Boundaries and Enrolments Kathyrn School Enrolments K GR1 GR2 GR3 GR4 GR5 GR6 GR7 GR8 Total County 14 9 9 8 9 9 6 9 12 85 Prairie Royal 1 0 0 2 0 0 2 1 2 8 Irricana 8 9 8 4 8 10 6 7 2 62 Other 1 0 1 3 1 0 4 2 3 7 Total 23 18 18 15 18 19 16 18 17 162 Capacity – 305 student spaces Beiseker High School Boundary Beiseker School Enrolments K GR1 GR2 GR3 GR4 GR5 GR6 GR7 GR8 GR9 GR10 GR11 GR12 Total County 0 3 6 9 4 10 8 6 5 18 13 5 13 100 Beiseker 7 7 6 5 8 11 7 15 9 8 4 6 4 97 Irricana 2 4 4 8 6 4 8 5 8 15 10 6 14 94 Other 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 5 Total 9 14 16 23 19 25 23 26 23 41 27 17 33 296 Capacity – 413 student spaces Beiseker Boundary Chestermere High and Beiseker Chestermere High High School Boundaries Boundary Prairie Royal – Where do the students attend? K GR1 GR2 GR3 GR4 GR5 GR6 GR7 GR8 GR9 GR10 GR11 GR12 Total East Lake 2 1 5 3 4 2 17 Chestermere 1 1 3 5 Lake Middle Kathyrn 1 0 0 2 0 0 2 1 2 8 Chestermere 3 2 3 8 High Other 1 1 2 Total 1 2 1 8 3 4 4 2 3 4 3 2 3 40 Irricana – Where do the students attend? K GR1 GR2 GR3 GR4 GR5 GR6 GR7 GR8 GR9 GR10 GR11 GR12 Total Beiseker 2 4 4 8 6 4 8 5 8 15 10 6 14 94 Kathyrn 8 9 8 4 8 10 6 7 2 62 George 1 2 1 4 8 McDougall Other 1 1 2 Total 10 14 12 12 14 14 14 12 10 16 12 8 18 166 How do we meet the challenges and consider the issues presented: RVS Ideas: u Increase the boundary for Kathyrn.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • St2 St9 St1 St3 St2
    ! SUPP2-Attachment 07 Page 1 of 8 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! .! ! ! ! ! ! SM O K Y L A K E C O U N T Y O F ! Redwater ! Busby Legal 9L960/9L961 57 ! 57! LAMONT 57 Elk Point 57 ! COUNTY ST . P A U L Proposed! Heathfield ! ! Lindbergh ! Lafond .! 56 STURGEON! ! COUNTY N O . 1 9 .! ! .! Alcomdale ! ! Andrew ! Riverview ! Converter Station ! . ! COUNTY ! .! . ! Whitford Mearns 942L/943L ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 56 ! 56 Bon Accord ! Sandy .! Willingdon ! 29 ! ! ! ! .! Wostok ST Beach ! 56 ! ! ! ! .!Star St. Michael ! ! Morinville ! ! ! Gibbons ! ! ! ! ! Brosseau ! ! ! Bruderheim ! . Sunrise ! ! .! .! ! ! Heinsburg ! ! Duvernay ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! 18 3 Beach .! Riviere Qui .! ! ! 4 2 Cardiff ! 7 6 5 55 L ! .! 55 9 8 ! ! 11 Barre 7 ! 12 55 .! 27 25 2423 22 ! 15 14 13 9 ! 21 55 19 17 16 ! Tulliby¯ Lake ! ! ! .! .! 9 ! ! ! Hairy Hill ! Carbondale !! Pine Sands / !! ! 44 ! ! L ! ! ! 2 Lamont Krakow ! Two Hills ST ! ! Namao 4 ! .Fort! ! ! .! 9 ! ! .! 37 ! ! . ! Josephburg ! Calahoo ST ! Musidora ! ! .! 54 ! ! ! 2 ! ST Saskatchewan! Chipman Morecambe Myrnam ! 54 54 Villeneuve ! 54 .! .! ! .! 45 ! .! ! ! ! ! ! ST ! ! I.D. Beauvallon Derwent ! ! ! ! ! ! ! STRATHCONA ! ! !! .! C O U N T Y O F ! 15 Hilliard ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! N O . 1 3 St. Albert! ! ST !! Spruce ! ! ! ! ! !! !! COUNTY ! TW O HI L L S 53 ! 45 Dewberry ! ! Mundare ST ! (ELK ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! . ! ! Clandonald ! ! N O . 2 1 53 ! Grove !53! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ISLAND) ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ardrossan
    [Show full text]
  • 2.2.6 Okotoks Economic Development Strategic Plan (2018 Update)
    TOWN OF OKOTOKS COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL GROWTH STUDY May 2021 Project Preface MXD Development Strategists Ltd. The resulting Commercial Development MXD Development Strategists Ltd. do not (“MXD”) of Richmond, British Columbia, Analysis document highlights seven warrant that any estimates contained within was commissioned by the Town of opportunity areas for immediate and the study will be achieved, but that they Okotoks (“the Client”) in December 2020 medium-term commercial and industrial have been prepared conscientiously on to prepare a Commercial and Industrial development that balances market, the basis of information obtained during Growth Study. Work was completed economic and planning considerations. the course of this market analysis. between December 2020 and May 2021. Three recommended priority projects are identified within these opportunity areas. Reference material used for this report The purpose of this assignment was to was derived from the project team, as well assess, identify and define the potential The figures presented in the report are as from the public and private sectors and development opportunities for commercial based on an evaluation of the current government publications. This information and industrial development in Okotoks general level of the economy in the local was supplemented by MXD’s experience in from a real estate, economic and planning and regional market, and neither take urban planning and real estate development. perspective. The second key objective into account, nor make provisions for was to identify immediate and medium- the effect of any sharp rise or decline in term opportunities for commercial and local or general economic conditions. industrial development in Okotoks and the optimal mix and positioning of land uses for these areas for opportunity.
    [Show full text]
  • Mountain View County
    June 2014 (Updated) Mountain View County C-65.1 Mountain View County Community Overview À à À 592 42 à Penhold 22 761 MarkervilleÀ 781 Spruce à À à Caroline View à 2 591 54 2A Dickson Innisfail À 590À 590 Burns ick À 791 Lake À 22 à 587 Bowden À À 587 766 WimborneÀ 2A à 805 584À B = 210 à à Torrington A = 144 27 Sundre 27 Olds 2 à 760À 583À C = 157 À À À 22 à 582 582 Didsbury 582 791À 2A à À D = 25 CarstairsÀ 581 E = 113 Cremona À 580 580 575À 579À À 734 À 766 À MaddenÀ 574 Bottrel 574 Crossfield à à 72 22 À 772 2 à Irricana À À 567À 567 567 Airdrie à à Waiparous À 40 9 Benchlands 567 À À 791 772 Kathyrn Keoma Cochrane Where subcommunities exist, letters (A, B, C, etc.) identify subcommunities; Legend numbers show the number of EDIs analyzed for each subcommunity. # of analyzed EDI 0 - 66 67 - 121 Please note: Percentages tend to be more representative when 122 - 203 ! they are based on larger numbers. 204 - 350 351 - 900 ECMap June 2014 (Updated) Mountain View County C-65.2 Additional Community Information EDI Summary: Number of EDIs available: 731 Number of EDIs used in analysis:649 % of special needs: 1.6% Age at EDI completion and gender Age Groups ≤ 5yrs 2mos 5yrs 3mos - 5yrs 6mos 5yrs 7mos - 5yrs 10mos > 5yrs 11mos Total Gender N (%) N (%) N (%) N (%) N (%) F 26 (4.0%) 78 (12.0%) 123 (19.0%) 88 (13.6%) 315 (48.5%) M 26 (4.0%) 89 (13.7%) 121 (18.6%) 98 (15.1%) 334 (51.5%) FM 52 (8.0%) 167 (25.7%) 244 (37.6%) 186 (28.7%) 649 (100%) * Please note: The total number of boys and girls in each category may not add up to an exact total because gender may not have been identifed in all questionnaires.
    [Show full text]
  • Published Local Histories
    ALBERTA HISTORIES Published Local Histories assembled by the Friends of Geographical Names Society as part of a Local History Mapping Project (in 1995) May 1999 ALBERTA LOCAL HISTORIES Alphabetical Listing of Local Histories by Book Title 100 Years Between the Rivers: A History of Glenwood, includes: Acme, Ardlebank, Bancroft, Berkeley, Hartley & Standoff — May Archibald, Helen Bircham, Davis, Delft, Gobert, Greenacres, Kia Ora, Leavitt, and Brenda Ferris, e , published by: Lilydale, Lorne, Selkirk, Simcoe, Sterlingville, Glenwood Historical Society [1984] FGN#587, Acres and Empires: A History of the Municipal District of CPL-F, PAA-T Rocky View No. 44 — Tracey Read , published by: includes: Glenwood, Hartley, Hillspring, Lone Municipal District of Rocky View No. 44 [1989] Rock, Mountain View, Wood, FGN#394, CPL-T, PAA-T 49ers [The], Stories of the Early Settlers — Margaret V. includes: Airdrie, Balzac, Beiseker, Bottrell, Bragg Green , published by: Thomasville Community Club Creek, Chestermere Lake, Cochrane, Conrich, [1967] FGN#225, CPL-F, PAA-T Crossfield, Dalemead, Dalroy, Delacour, Glenbow, includes: Kinella, Kinnaird, Thomasville, Indus, Irricana, Kathyrn, Keoma, Langdon, Madden, 50 Golden Years— Bonnyville, Alta — Bonnyville Mitford, Sampsontown, Shepard, Tribune , published by: Bonnyville Tribune [1957] Across the Smoky — Winnie Moore & Fran Moore, ed. , FGN#102, CPL-F, PAA-T published by: Debolt & District Pioneer Museum includes: Bonnyville, Moose Lake, Onion Lake, Society [1978] FGN#10, CPL-T, PAA-T 60 Years: Hilda’s Heritage,
    [Show full text]
  • Press Release Calgary Stampede 4-H Rodeo
    September 19, 2010 NEWS RELEASE Stampede 4-H Rodeo: A study in harmonious horsemanship CALGARY – Wavelengths aren’t confined to the world of physics. To enjoy true success in the saddle, it takes two . riding in unity, reading each other’s thoughts. “Understanding your horse does play a huge role in rodeo,” said Jonathan Wrubleski, 16, of Leduc, Alta., under the Calgary Stampede’s Big Top on Sunday afternoon. “It helped me win today.” The Stampede held its 13th annual Invitational 4-H Rodeo, sponsored by Westcan Bulk Transport and Lammle’s Western Wear and Tack, over the weekend – with more than 100 youngsters, aged 9 through 20 and representing thirty 4-H clubs from across Alberta, congregating at Stampede Park for the two-day event. For many, the Stampede’s annual youth invitational affair is an entry point into the world of rodeo, and these young cowboys and cowgirls tested their chops with both timed events (barrel racing, pole bending, and thread-the-needle) and roughstock events (breakaway roping, goat tying, and Coralee Shantz, of High River, and Sprite negotiate the pole- cow riding). bending course at the Calgary Stampede's 13th annual Invitational 4-H Rodeo on Saturday, Sept. 18 under the Big Top. Photo: Calgary Stampede In recent years, education has become an increasingly important aspect of the Stampede’s 4-H Rodeo, and this past weekend’s event featured an intriguing Saturday-morning seminar on the subject of horse harmony — a “horse personalities” clinic by Dessa Hockley of Millarville, Alta., author of the book Is Your Horse a Rock Star? “We keep it fun and lighthearted.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Municipal Codes
    2017 Municipal Codes Updated December 22, 2017 Municipal Services Branch 17th Floor Commerce Place 10155 - 102 Street Edmonton, Alberta T5J 4L4 Phone: 780-427-2225 Fax: 780-420-1016 E-mail: [email protected] 2017 MUNICIPAL CHANGES STATUS CHANGES: 0315 - The Village of Thorsby became the Town of Thorsby (effective January 1, 2017). NAME CHANGES: 0315- The Town of Thorsby (effective January 1, 2017) from Village of Thorsby. AMALGAMATED: FORMATIONS: DISSOLVED: 0038 –The Village of Botha dissolved and became part of the County of Stettler (effective September 1, 2017). 0352 –The Village of Willingdon dissolved and became part of the County of Two Hills (effective September 1, 2017). CODE NUMBERS RESERVED: 4737 Capital Region Board 0522 Metis Settlements General Council 0524 R.M. of Brittania (Sask.) 0462 Townsite of Redwood Meadows 5284 Calgary Regional Partnership STATUS CODES: 01 Cities (18)* 15 Hamlet & Urban Services Areas (396) 09 Specialized Municipalities (5) 20 Services Commissions (71) 06 Municipal Districts (64) 25 First Nations (52) 02 Towns (108) 26 Indian Reserves (138) 03 Villages (87) 50 Local Government Associations (22) 04 Summer Villages (51) 60 Emergency Districts (12) 07 Improvement Districts (8) 98 Reserved Codes (5) 08 Special Areas (3) 11 Metis Settlements (8) * (Includes Lloydminster) December 22, 2017 Page 1 of 13 CITIES CODE CITIES CODE NO. NO. Airdrie 0003 Brooks 0043 Calgary 0046 Camrose 0048 Chestermere 0356 Cold Lake 0525 Edmonton 0098 Fort Saskatchewan 0117 Grande Prairie 0132 Lacombe 0194 Leduc 0200 Lethbridge 0203 Lloydminster* 0206 Medicine Hat 0217 Red Deer 0262 Spruce Grove 0291 St. Albert 0292 Wetaskiwin 0347 *Alberta only SPECIALIZED MUNICIPALITY CODE SPECIALIZED MUNICIPALITY CODE NO.
    [Show full text]
  • Updated Population of Places on the Alberta Road Map with Less Than 50 People
    Updated Population of Places on the Alberta Road Map with less than 50 People Place Population Place Population Abee 25 Huallen 28 Altario 26 Hylo 22 Ardenode 0 Iddesleigh 14 Armena 35 Imperial Mills 19 Atikameg 22 Indian Cabins 11 Atmore 37 Kapasiwin 14 Beauvallon 7 Kathryn 29 Beaver Crossing 18 Kavanagh 41 Beaverdam 15 Kelsey 10 Bindloss 14 Keoma 40 Birch Cove 19 Kirkcaldy 24 Bloomsbury 18 Kirriemuir 28 Bodo 26 La Corey 40 Brant 46 Lafond 36 Breynat 22 Lake Isle 26 Brownfield 27 Larkspur 21 Buford 47 Leavitt 48 Burmis 32 Lindale 26 Byemoor 40 Lindbrook 18 Carcajou 17 Little Smoky 28 Carvel 37 Lyalta 21 Caslan 23 MacKay 15 Cessford 31 Madden 36 Chinook 38 Manola 29 Chisholm 20 Mariana Lake 8 Compeer 21 Marten Beach 38 Conrich 19 McLaughlin 41 Cynthia 37 Meeting Creek 42 Dalemead 32 Michichi 42 Dapp 27 Millarville 43 De Winton 44 Mission Beach 37 Deadwood 22 Mossleigh 47 Del Bonita 20 Musidora 13 Dorothy 14 Nestow 10 Duvernay 26 Nevis 30 Ellscott 10 New Bridgden 24 Endiang 35 New Dayton 47 Ensign 17 Nisku 40 Falun 25 Nojack 19 Fitzgerald 4 North Star 49 Flatbush 30 Notekiwin 17 Fleet 28 Onefour 31 Gadsby 40 Opal 13 Gem 24 Orion 11 Genesee 18 Peace Point 21 Glenevis 25 Peoria 12 Goodfare 11 Perryvale 20 Hairy Hill 46 Pincher 35 Heath 14 Pocahontas 10 Hilliard 35 Poe 15 Hoadley 9 Purple Springs 26 Hobbema 35 Queenstown 15 Page 1 of 2 Updated Population of Places on the Alberta Road Map with less than 50 People Rainier1 29 Star 32 Raven 12 Steen River 12 Red Willow 40 Streamstown 15 Reno 20 Sundance Beach 37 Ribstone 48 Sunnynook 13 Rich Valley 32 Tangent 39 Richdale 14 Tawatinaw 10 Rivercourse 14 Telfordville 28 Rowley 11 Tulliby Lake 18 St.
    [Show full text]
  • AREA Housing Statistics by Economic Region AREA Housing Statistics by Economic Region
    AREA Housing Statistics by Economic Region AREA Housing Statistics by Economic Region AREA Chief Economist https://albertare.configio.com/page/ann-marie-lurie-bioAnn-Marie Lurie analyzes Alberta’s resale housing statistics both provincially and regionally. In order to allow for better analysis of housing sales data, we have aligned our reporting regions to the census divisions used by Statistics Canada. Economic Region AB-NW: Athabasca – Grande Prairie – Peace River 17 16 Economic Region AB-NE: Wood Buffalo – Cold Lake Economic Region AB-W: 19 Banff – Jasper – Rocky Mountain House 18 12 Economic Region AB-Edmonton 13 14 Economic Region AB-Red Deer 11 10 Economic Region AB-E: 9 8 7 Camrose – Drumheller 15 6 4 5 Economic Region AB-Calgary Economic Region AB-S: 2 1 3 Lethbridge – Medicine Hat New reports are released on the sixth of each month, except on weekends or holidays when it is released on the following business day. AREA Housing Statistics by Economic Region 1 Alberta Economic Region North West Grande Prairie – Athabasca – Peace River Division 17 Municipal District Towns Hamlets, villages, Other Big Lakes County - 0506 High Prairie - 0147 Enilda (0694), Faust (0702), Grouard Swan Hills - 0309 (0719), Joussard (0742), Kinuso (0189), Rural Big Lakes County (9506) Clear Hills – 0504 Cleardale (0664), Worsley (0884), Hines Creek (0150), Rural Big Lakes county (9504) Lesser Slave River no 124 - Slave Lake - 0284 Canyon Creek (0898), Chisholm (0661), 0507 Flatbush (0705), Marten Beach (0780), Smith (0839), Wagner (0649), Widewater (0899), Slave Lake (0284), Rural Slave River (9507) Northern Lights County - Manning – 0212 Deadwood (0679), Dixonville (0684), 0511 North Star (0892), Notikewin (0893), Rural Northern Lights County (9511) Northern Sunrise County - Cadotte Lake (0645), Little Buffalo 0496 (0762), Marie Reine (0777), Reno (0814), St.
    [Show full text]
  • Municipal District Profiles
    Location and History Profile Created on 9/11/2015 12:46:05PM Municipal District of Acadia No. 34 Municipal Code: 0001 Location Description View Location Map (url to the pdf location map) Twp Rge Mer Longitude Latitude 25 24 W4 °' °' Urban municipalities within the municipal boundary (None) Hamlets/urban service areas within the municipal boundary Acadia Valley Incorporation History Municipal Boundary Document Search (url to search results page of Annexation PDF's) Status: Municipal District Effective Date: April 01, 1945 Authority: Ministerial Order Authority Date: April 06, 1945 Gazette: Apr 14, 1945, p. 335 Comments: The Municipal District of Acadia No. 241 was renumbered as the Municipal District of Acadia No. 34. Numbers were changed for all municipal districts throughout the province. Status: Municipal District Effective Date: December 09, 1913 Authority: Ministerial Order Authority Date: October 04, 1913 Gazette: Oct 31, 1913, p. 871 Comments: Organized as the Rural Municipality of Acadia No. 241. Status: Municipal District Effective Date: December 08, 1913 Authority: Corrrected Notice, Organized as a Rural Municipality Authority Date: Gazette: Nov 15, 1913 p. 923 Comments: Corrrected Notice, Organized as a Rural Municipality The Municipal Profiles are a compilation of statistical, financial, and other information about municipalities in the Province of Alberta. The information is based on reports submitted and data made available to Alberta Municipal Affairs as of today. The Ministry is not responsible for the accuracy of the information. Users are encouraged to verify the accuracy of the information contained in the Municipal Profiles before relying on it. 1 Contacts Profile Created on 9/11/2015 12:48:00PM Municipal District of Acadia No.
    [Show full text]
  • Co-Operative Stormwater Management Initiative
    CO‐OPERATIVE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT INITIATIVE Engineering Assessment of Preferred Stormwater Management Options FINAL APRIL, 2014 Suite 260, East Atrium 2635 – 37 Ave NE Calgary, AB T1Y 5Z6 Phone: 403-250-1362 1-800-351-0929 Fax: 403-250-1518 Co‐operative Stormwater Management Initiative April 23, 2014 c/o Western Irrigation District File: N:\29\159 CSMI\Reports\Final Box 2372 Strathmore, Alberta T1P 1K3 Attention: CSMI Partners Dear Partners: Re: Co‐operative Stormwater Management Initiative Engineering Assessment of Preferred Stormwater Management Options MPE Engineering Ltd. (MPE) is pleased to submit the “Engineering Assessment of Preferred Stormwater Management Options Report” to the Co‐operative Stormwater Management Initiative (CSMI). MPE has been proud to be part of this CSMI regional collaborative process. The initiative being undertaken by the CSMI respects the interests of all parties concerned. The willingness and cooperation demonstrated in the development of the preferred solution by all partners will form a solid basis to move forward with the regional stormwater management solution proposed. MPE looks forward to the opportunity to assist CSMI in implementing the next phases of this long‐term solution. Should you have any inquiries with regards to the report, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. Yours truly, Daniel Parker, P.Eng. Senior Engineering Manager DLP/bl Enclosure Co‐operative Stormwater Management Initiative Final – April, 2014 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Co‐operative Stormwater Management Initiative (CSMI) was formed to assist municipalities and Western Irrigation District (WID) to work together to find an effective and feasible solution to an issue that affects each sector in different ways.
    [Show full text]
  • BOARD ORDER: MGB 019/17 FILE: 16/IMD-001 Page 1 of 55 in the MATTER of the Municipal Government Act Being Chapter M-26 of the Re
    BOARD ORDER: MGB 019/17 FILE: 16/IMD-001 IN THE MATTER OF THE Municipal Government Act being Chapter M-26 of the Revised Statutes of Alberta 2000 (Act). AND IN THE MATTER OF AN INTERMUNICIPAL DISPUTE lodged by City of Chestermere against Rocky View County Bylaw C-7468-2015 (Conrich Area Structure Plan) CITATION: City of Chestermere v Rocky View County re C-7468-2015 Conrich Area Structure Plan, 2017 ABMGB 19 BEFORE: Members: D. Thomas, Presiding Officer T. Golden B. Horrocks Case Managers: C. Miller Reade R. Duncan This is a dispute filed with the Municipal Government Board (MGB) after the adoption of Bylaw C-7468-2015 by Rocky View County (Rocky View). The City of Chestermere (Chestermere) has filed a dispute under Section 690 of the Act claiming that portions of the Bylaw has or may have a detrimental effect on it. Upon notice being given to the interested parties, a hearing was held in the City of Calgary, in the Province of Alberta, from September 13 to September 23, 2016. Closing summaries were submitted following the hearing, and the hearing was closed April 19, 2017. 131-M19/17 Page 1 of 55 BOARD ORDER: MGB 019/17 FILE: 16/IMD-001 Table of Contents OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................................................................. 4 TERMS USED IN THIS ORDER .................................................................................................................................. 5 PART A: BACKGROUND TO THE INTERMUNICIPAL DISPUTE? ...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • North Conrich Salt Transload Facility & Storage Depot
    NORTH CONRICH SALT TRANSLOAD FACILITY & STORAGE DEPOT A MASTER SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN to support applications for Land Use Amendment & Development Permit DRAFT FOR CIRCULATION CIRCULATION DRAFT | December 2015 Prepared for NSC Minerals Ltd. Prepared by B&A Planning Group NORTH CONRICH SALT TRANSLOAD FACILITY & STORAGE DEPOT A MASTER SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN to support applications for Land Use Amendment & Development Permit CIRCULATION DRAFT | December 2015 Prepared for NSC Minerals Ltd. 251 Midpark Blvd SE Calgary, AB T2X 1S3 (403) 873-0322 Prepared by B&A Planning Group #600 940 - 6th Ave SW Calgary, AB T2P 3T1 (403) 269-4733 NORTH CONRICH SALT TRANSLOAD FACILITY STORAGE DEPOT | MSDP TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 01 2.0 PROJECT VISION & RATIONALE 02 3.0 AREA CONTEXT 03 4.0 SITE CONDITIONS 07 5.0 MUNICIPAL POLICY CONTEXT 12 6.0 DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT 17 7.0 TRANSPORTATION 21 8.0 UTILITY SERVICING 24 9.0 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT 28 10.0 EMERGENCY RESPONSE 32 11.0 SITE DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS 33 12.0 IMPLEMENTATION 35 13.0 COMMUNITY CONSULTATION 39 14.0 CONCLUSION 40 NSC MINERALS LTD. | DECEMBER 2015 LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 1: REGIONAL CONTEXT 04 FIGURE 2: CONRICH AREA CONTEXT 05 FIGURE 3: EXISTING LAND USE 06 FIGURE 4: EXISTING CONDITIONS 08 FIGURE 5: DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT 18 FIGURE 6: TRANSPORTATION 22 FIGURE 7: WATER SERVICING 26 FIGURE 8: WASTEWATER SERVICING 27 FIGURE 9: STORMWATER MANAGEMENT 29 FIGURE 10: PROPOSED LAND USE 36 FIGURE 11: DEVELOPMENT PHASING 38 NORTH CONRICH SALT TRANSLOAD FACILITY STORAGE DEPOT | MSDP 01 01 INTRODUCTION In accordance with Section 14.19 of the Rocky View County Municipal Development Plan Bylaw C-7280-2013 (The County Plan), this Master Site Development Plan (MSDP) contemplates a unique business development opportunity to be implemented directly adjacent to the Three Hills Subdivision main railway line owned and operated by CN Railway.
    [Show full text]