DOCSLIB.ORG

1.1 Project Title: GEF Private Areas

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1.1 Project Title: GEF Private Areas ; PROJECT DOCUMENT SECTION 1: PROJECT IDENTIFICATION 1.1 Project title: GEF Private areas - Realising the biodiversity conservation potential of private lands in Brazil 1.2 Project number: 9413 PMS: 1.3 Project type: 1.4 Trust Fund: GEF 1.5 Strategic objectives: GEF strategic long-term objective: BD-4; LD-2; LD-3; SFM-1, SFM-2 Strategic programme for GEF IV: 1.6 UN Environment priority: 1.7 Geographical scope: National 1.8 Mode of execution: External 1.9 Project executing organization: Ministry of the Environment MMA, International Institute for Sustainability IIS 1.10 Duration of project: 60 months Commencing: January 2018 Technical completion: December 2022 Validity of legal instrument: 1.11 Cost of project US$ % Cost to the GEF Trust Fund 8,953,425 21% Co-financing 33,892,917 79% MMA - SFB 16,900,000 39% MMA - SBio 1,836,758 4% SECIMA/GO 13,901,439 32% IIS 1,254,720 3% Total 42,846,342 100% 1 1.12 Project summary In 2010, the Convention on Biological Diversity established 20 Aichi Biodiversity Targets, whose achievement depend on actions that go beyond the establishment of protected areas governed by government, multi-party bodies, or indigenous people. Brazil, one of the most biodiverse countries worldwide, has two pillars for biodiversity conservation: one of the largest systems of protected areas in the world (governed by federal government or by multi-party bodies) and the protected indigenous reserves. However, Brazil does not have a comprehensive set of instruments that support effective programs of biodiversity conservation in private areas, where approximately 53% of its remnant vegetation cover are located. The country thus has the potential of leading initiatives of conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity in private areas that can act as other effective area-based conservation measures, potentially assisting the achievement of some Aichi Biodiversity Targets. Currently, the main threats to biodiversity in private areas with native vegetation in Brazil are unsustainable farming, unsustainable native vegetation management, illegal hunting, and spread of alien invasive species. Although several initiatives have been developed in order to overcome these threats, there are several factors which contribute to such threats that still need to be tackled, so conservation in private areas can be effective. The main factors are poor knowledge about conservation value of private areas; low institutional capacity and inadequate governance; and harmful subsidies. Given this context, the long-term goal of this project is to enhance biodiversity conservation and ecosystem services provision, increase connectivity and native vegetation cover, reduce environmental degradation in private areas, improve endangered species conservation, and mitigate climate change. The short and medium-term objective of this project is to scale up sustainable landscape management and contribute to biodiversity conservation and ecosystem services provision in private areas in Brazil. The project encompasses three interrelated components. First, implementing pilot areas located in the biogeographical regions of Atlantic Forest and Cerrado, where the activities that will be developed are related to reducing degree of fragmentation in production landscapes, increasing habitat availability for endangered species, and developing incentives schemes for conservation. Second, establishing a sectorial agreement with Forestry companies to enhance biodiversity conservation and recovery of native vegetation. Third, improving public capabilities to plan and implement conservation policies in private areas by mainstreaming conservation value in public policies and tools. The project duration is 60 months, and it will be implemented by United Nations Environment Programme and executed locally by the Brazilian Ministry of Environment and the International Institute for Sustainability. The project is aligned with the Results Framework for GEF Trust Fund (6th Replenishment) on Biodiversity - BD (Objective 4, Program 9, Outcomes 9.1 and 9.2); Land Degradation - LD (Objective 2, Program 3, Outcomes 2.1 and 2.2; Objective 3, Program 4, Outcomes 3.1 and 3.2); and Sustainable Forest Management - SFM (Objective 1, Program 2, Outcomes 1 and 2; Objective 2, Program 5, Outcome 3;). 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1: Project Identification 1 Acronyms and Abbreviations 4 Terms and definitions 7 SECTION 2: Background and Situation Analysis (Baseline course of action) 10 2.1. Background and context 10 2.2. Global Significance 18 2.3. Threats, root causes and barrier analysis 19 2.4. Institutional, sectorial and policy context 25 2.5. Stakeholder mapping and analysis 30 2.6. Baseline analysis and gaps 38 2.7. Linkages with other GEF and non-GEF interventions 44 Section 3: Intervention strategy (Alternative) 47 3.1. Project rationale, policy conformity and expected global environmental benefits 47 3.2. Project goal and objective 52 3.3. Project components and expected results 55 3.4. Intervention logic and key assumptions 70 3.5. Risk analysis and risk management measures 71 3.6. Consistency with national priorities or plans 75 3.7. Incremental cost reasoning 78 3.8. Sustainability 78 3.9. Replication 80 3.10. Public awareness, communications and mainstreaming strategy 81 3.11. Environmental and social safeguards 82 Section 4: Institutional Framework and Implementation Arrangements 84 Section 5: Stakeholder participation 86 Section 6: MONITORING AND EVALUATION PLAN 87 Section 7: Project Financing and Budget 89 7.1 Overall Project Budget 89 7.2 Project Co-financing 89 SECTION 8: REFERENCES 92 Appendices 96 3 Appendices 1 and 2: Budget by project components, co-financing by source and UN Environment budget lines 96 Appendix 3: Incremental cost analysis 97 Appendix 4: Results Framework 100 Appendix 5: Workplan and timetable 104 Appendix 6: Key deliverables and benchmarks 105 Appendix 7: Costed M&E plan 106 Appendix 8: Summary of reporting requirements and responsibilities 107 Appendix 9: Standard Terminal Evaluation TOR 108 Appendix 10: Decision-making flowchart and organizational chart 109 Appendix 11: Terms of Reference 112 Appendix 12: Co-financing commitment letters from project partners 124 Appendix 13: Endorsement letters of GEF National Focal Points 129 Appendix 14: Draft procurement plan 130 Appendix 15: Tracking Tools 138 Appendix 16: Scientific methodology and calculations for GHG emissions 138 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS Sector Plan for Mitigation and Adaptation to Climate Change for the ABC Plan Consolidation of a Low Carbon Economy in Agriculture ABIO Organic Farmers Association of Rio de Janeiro State APA Environmental Protection Area89 Owners Association of Private Reserve of the Natural Heritage of Goiás and APRPPN Distrito Federal Germany Federal Ministry of the Environment, Nature Conservation, Building BMUB and Nuclear Safety CAB Cultivating Good Water CAR Rural Environmental Register CAT Tourist Assistance Centre CBD Convention on Biological Diversity CEDRO Cooperative of Work, Consulting, Projects and Services in Sustainability CEPA Research State Centre in Agroforestry CONABIO National Biodiversity Commission Conaveg National Commission for Recovery of Native Vegetation CRA Environmental Reserve Certificate CSRio Rio Conservation and Sustainability Science Centre 4 CVPA Conservation Value on Private Areas DU Demonstration Units Rio Enterprise Technical Assistance and Rural State of Rio de Janeiro Emater Extension ENREDD+ National REDD+ Strategy EOU Evaluation and Oversight Unit NBSAP National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan FBDS The Brazilian Foundation for Sustainable Development FIP Forest Investment Program FUNATURA Pronature Foundation GIZ Deutsche Gesellschaftfür Internationale Zusammenarbeit Ibá Brazilian Tree Industry ICMBio Chico Mendes Institute for Biodiversity Conservation IIS International Institute for Sustainability IKI International Climate Initiative iLPF Integration of Crops-Livestock-Forestry iNDC intended Nationally Determined Contribution ICMS-E Ecological value added tax INEA Rio de Janeiro State Environmental Institute IUCN International Union for Conservation of Nature KFW German development bank LPVN Law on Protection of Native Vegetation LR Legal Reserve MCTIC Brazilian Ministry of Science, Technology, Innovation and Communications MMA Ministry of the Environment NBSAP National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan NDC Nationally Determined Contribution OECMs Other Effective Area-Based Conservation Measures PAs Private areas PANs National Action Plans for the Conservation of Endangered Species PES Payment for Environmental Services PESAGRO Agricultural Research Corporation of Rio de Janeiro State PIR Project Implementation Review Planaveg National Plan for Native Vegetation Recovery PMFS Sustainable Forest Management plan PNMC National Policy on Climate Change PPAs Permanent Preservation Areas (PPAs) PRA Environmental Regularization Program Pronaf Family Agriculture Strengthening Program Proveg National Policy for Native Vegetation Recovery 5 PSS Sustainable Supply Plan PUC Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation and the role of REDD+ conservation, sustainable management of forests and enhancement of forest carbon stocks in developing countries Rio Rural Secretary of Agriculture and Livestock of Rio de Janeiro State Programme RPPNs Private Reserves of Natural Heritage SAFs Agroforestry Systems Secretary for the Environment, Water Resources, Infrastructure,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Conservação Do Município De Baependi
    MAPA DE ÁREAS PRIORITARIAS PARA CONSERVAÇÃO DO MUNICÍPIO DE BAEPENDI - MG 486019 491019 496019 501019 506019 511019 516019 521019 526019 531019 536019 541019 546019 45°5'W 45°0'W 44°55'W 44°50'W 44°45'W 44°40'W 44°35'W SÃO VICENTE DE MINAS 0 0 2 2 7 SÃO TOMÉ DAS LETRAS 7 7 7 8 8 5 5 7 7 S ' S ' 0 0 5 TRÊS CORAÇÕES 5 ° CRUZÍLIA ° 1 1 2 SERRANOS 2 0 0 2 2 7 7 2 2 8 8 5 5 7 7 CONCEIÇÃO DO RIO VERDE 0 0 2 2 7 7 7 7 7 7 5 5 S S ' ' 7 7 5 5 5 5 ° ° 1 1 2 2 SERITINGA 0 0 2 2 7 7 2 2 7 7 5 5 7 7 AIURUOCA CAXAMBU 0 0 2 2 7 7 7 7 S S ' ' 6 6 0 0 ° ° 5 5 2 2 7 7 2 2 CARVALHOS SOLEDADE DE MINAS 0 0 2 2 7 7 2 2 6 6 5 5 7 7 0 0 S S ' 2 2 ' 5 5 7 7 ° ° 7 7 2 2 2 2 5 5 5 5 7 7 CARMO DE MINAS SÃO LOURENÇO 0 0 2 2 7 7 2 2 5 5 5 5 7 7 S ' S POUSO ALTO ' 0 0 1 1 0 0 ° ° 2 2 2 2 2 2 7 7 7 7 4 4 5 BOCAINA DE MINAS 5 PARQUE ESTADUAL DA 7 7 SERRA DO PAPAGAIO ALAGOA DOM VIÇOSO SÃO SEBASTIÃO DO RIO VERDE 1:80.000 0 1.000 2.000 3.000 4.000 0 BAEPENDI Metros ITAMONTE 2 7 2 45°5'W 45°0'W 44°55'W 44°50'W 44°45'W 44°40'W 44°35'W 4 5 486019 491019 496019 501019 506019 511019 516019 521019 526019 531019 536019 541019 546019 7 MAPA DE ÁREAS PRIORITÁRIAS PARA MAPA DE ÁREAS PRIORITÁRIAS PARA SÃO VICENTE DE MINAS 0 0 SÃO VICENTE DE MINAS CONSERVAÇÃO DA FAUNA 4 9 CONSERVAÇÃO DA FLORA 8 8 7 7 SÃO TOMÉ DAS LETRAS 8 8 SÃO TOMÉ DAS LETRAS 5 5 7 7 S S ' TRÊS CORAÇÕES ' TRÊS CORAÇÕES 0 0 5 5 ° ° 1 1 2 CRUZÍLIA 2 CRUZÍLIA SERRANOS 0 0 SERRANOS 4 9 8 8 2 2 8 8 5 5 7 7 0 0 CONCEIÇÃO DO RIO VERDE 4 9 CONCEIÇÃO DO RIO VERDE 8 8 7 7 7 7 S S 5 5 ' ' 5 5 7 7 5 5 ° ° 1 1 2 2 SERITINGA SERITINGA
    [Show full text]
  • Linking REDD+ to Support Brazil's Climate Goals and Implementation
    FOREST TRENDS PUBLIC-PRIVATE FINANCE INITIATIVE NOVEMBER 2016 Linking REDD+ to Support Brazil’s Climate Goals and Implementation of the Forest Code Rupert Edwards SUPPORTERS About Forest Trends Forest Trends works to conserve forests and other ecosystems through the creation and wide adoption of a broad range of environmental finance, markets and other payment and incentive mechanisms. Forest Trends does so by: 1) providing transparent information on ecosystem values, finance, and markets through knowledge acquisition, analysis, and dissemination; 2) convening diverse coalitions, partners, and communities of practice to promote environmental values and advance development of new markets and payment mechanisms; and 3) demonstrating successful tools, standards, and models of innovative finance for conservation. About Forest Trends’ Public-Private Finance Initiative Conserving forest and ecosystems and transforming land use at scale to sustainable low-emissions production systems requires substantial investment. Our Public-Private Finance Initiative is strategically focused on creating architectures that increase the amount of capital flowing to land use practices which reduce emissions from deforestation and degradation, improve the productivity of agricultural and livestock systems, and enhance live- lihoods of rural populations. Linking REDD+ to Support Brazil’s Climate Goals and Implementation of the Forest Code Rupert Edwards November 2016 SUPPORTERS Acknowledgments We gratefully acknowledge Ruben Lubowski (Environmental Defense Fund), Ronaldo Seroa da Motta (Earth Innovation Institute and State University of Rio de Janeiro), and Josh Gregory (Forest Trends) for their anal- ysis and review for this paper. We would also like to thank David Tepper, Director of Forest Trends’ Public-Private Finance Initiative, and Michael Jenkins, President and CEO of Forest Trends, for their guidance.
    [Show full text]
  • Municípios Que Aderiram Ao Minas Consciente
    MUNICÍPIOS QUE ADERIRAM AO MINAS CONSCIENTE Nº de Município Macrorregião habitantes* 1 Abaeté 23.237 Centro 2 Abre Campo 13.454 Leste do Sul 3 Acaiaca 3.994 Leste do Sul 4 Alagoa 2.674 Sul 5 Além Paraíba 35.362 Sudeste 6 Alterosa 14.466 Sul 7 Alto Caparaó 5.847 Leste do Sul 8 Alto Jequitibá 8.317 Leste do Sul 9 Alto Rio Doce 11.000 Centro Sul 10 Alvorada de Minas 3.606 Jequitinhonha 11 Amparo da Serra 4.713 Leste do Sul 12 Andradas 41.077 Sul 13 Andrelândia 12.224 Sudeste 14 Antônio Carlos 11.445 Centro Sul 15 Arantina 2.795 Sudeste 16 Arapuá 2.834 Noroeste 17 Araújos 9.273 Oeste 18 Argirita 2.727 Sudeste 19 Astolfo Dutra 14.179 Sudeste 20 Augusto de Lima 4.869 Centro 21 Bandeira do Sul 5.746 Sul 22 Barbacena 137.313 Centro Sul 23 Barra Longa 5.131 Leste do Sul 24 Barroso 20.810 Centro Sul 25 Belmiro Braga 3.429 Sudeste 26 Berizal 4.735 Norte 27 Betim 439.340 Centro 28 Bicas 14.494 Sudeste 29 Bocaina de Minas 5.090 Sudeste 30 Bocaiúva 49.979 Norte 31 Bom Jardim de Minas 6.474 Sudeste 32 Bom Jesus da Penha 4.217 Sul 33 Bom Sucesso 17.603 Centro Sul 34 Borda da Mata 19.412 Sul 35 Brás Pires 4.333 Sudeste 36 Brasilândia de Minas 16.538 Noroeste 37 Brasília de Minas 32.347 Norte 38 Braúnas 4.801 Vale do Aço 39 Bueno Brandão 11.001 Sul 40 Buenópolis 10.365 Centro 41 Cabeceira Grande 6.949 Noroeste 42 Cachoeira da Prata 3.603 Centro 43 Campo Florido 8.151 Triângulo do Sul 44 Cana Verde 5.603 Oeste 45 Canaã 4.563 Leste do Sul 46 Cantagalo 4.525 Leste 47 Caparaó 5.438 Sudeste 48 Capela Nova 4.653 Centro Sul 49 Capetinga 6.920 Sul 50 Capitão Enéas
    [Show full text]
  • BOLETIM EPIDEMIOLÓGICO COVID-19: Doença Causada Pelo Coronavírus – 19
    BOLETIM EPIDEMIOLÓGICO COVID-19: Doença causada pelo coronavírus – 19 sexta-feira, 26 de março de 2021 CENÁRIO EM MINAS GERAIS - COVID-19 CORONAVÍRUS Total de Casos Confirmados Casos em Acompanhamento Casos Recuperados Óbitos Confirmados 1.081.981 92.325 966.769 22.887 Fonte: Painel COVID-19 MG/Sala de Situação/SubVS/SES/MG. Dados parciais, sujeitos a alterações. TOTAL DE CASOS CONFIRMADOS: soma dos casos confirmados que não evoluíram para óbito e dos óbitos confirmados por COVID-19. CASOS RECUPERADOS: casos confirmados de COVID-19 que receberam alta hospitalar e/ou cumpriram isolamento domiciliar de 10 dias E estão há 72h assintomáticos (sem a utilização de medicamentos sintomáticos) E sem intercorrências. CASOS EM ACOMPANHAMENTO: casos confirmados de COVID-19 que não evoluíram para óbito, cuja condição clínica permanece sendo acompanhada ou aguarda atualização pelos municípios. ÓBITOS CONFIRMADOS: óbitos confirmados para COVID-19. Nº de Casos Confirmados nas Últimas 24h Nº de Óbitos Confirmados nas Últimas 24h 14.062 316 Observação: o “número de casos e óbitos confirmados nas últimas 24h” pode não retratar a ocorrência de novos casos no período, mas o total de casos notificados à SES/MG nas últimas 24h. / PERFIL EPIDEMIOLÓGICO DOS CASOS CONFIRMADOS DE COVID-19 QUE NÃO EVOLUÍRAM PARA ÓBITO, MG, 2020 Quantidade de Casos por Sexo Apresenta Fator de Risco (Comorbidade*) Quantidade de casos por Faixa Etária SIM 7% NÃO 7% <1ANO 0,6% Média de Idade dos Casos MASCULINO Confirmados: 42 anos 48% 1 A 9 ANOS 2,3% 10 A 19 ANOS 5,3% 20 A 29 ANOS 18,1% 30 A 39 ANOS 23,0% 40 A 49 ANOS 18,9% FEMININO 50 A 59 ANOS 14,5% 52% NÃO INFORMADO 86% 60 ANOS OU MAIS 17,1% *Dados parciais, aguardando atualização dos municípios.
    [Show full text]
  • World Wildlife Fund
    WWF 9 WORLD WILDLIFE FUND SEMI-ANNUAL TECHNICAL PROGRESS REPORT USAID Grant #512-G-OO-96-00041 Protected Areas & Sustainable Resource Management Amazon Development Policy Capacity Building October 1, 2001 to March 31, 2002 Component I- Protected Areas Jau National Park Highlights • Three new species recorded for Jaii -A Ph.D. research study conducted by FVA staff member Sergio Borges registered three species ofbirds new to the Jaii National Park: SeiuntS novaboracensis, Miyopagisflaviventris, and Nonnula amaurocephala. The latter is a species very rarely recorded in the Amazon. The bird inventory of Jaii National Park is now one of the best known in the entire Brazilian Amazon, as it is the only one in existence that has been maintained systematically over an uninterrupted ten-year period. • FVA receives Environmental Award - Ms. Muriel Saragoussi, representing FVA activities in the Jaii National Park, was one offive recipients ofthe Claudia Magazine Award for her contributions to nature conservation. Claudia Magazine is the most important weekly publication in Brazil dedicated to women. The award targets women who have made significant contributions in the areas ofhealth, education, social entrepreneurship, and the environment. Progress Windows on Biodiversity Project - With the conclusion ofits third phase last semester, the project entered its fourth and final phase, and will focus on the monitoring and evaluation ofthe results attained, as well as on the publication ofmaterials for dissemination. In this last phase, the project will continue to carry out the field expedition program. In February, FVA implemented an internal planning process where decisions were reached on the 2002 work plan and on coordination ofthe thematic areas ofthe project.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Aimorés 2 3 Albertina 4 5 Almenara 6 7 Alto Jequitibá 8 9 10 11 12 13
    ICMS PATRIMÔNIO CULTURAL MUNICÍPIOS PARTICIPANTES DA RODADA REGIONAL DO PATRIMÔNIO CULTURAL EM 2019 - PARA O EXERCÍCIO 2021 1 Aimorés 2 Aiuruoca 3 Albertina 4 Alfenas 5 Almenara 6 Alpinópolis 7 Alto Jequitibá 8 Alvorada de Minas 9 Andradas 10 Angelândia 11 Antônio Carlos 12 Araçai 13 Araçuai 14 Araguari 15 Arantina 16 Arapua 17 Araújos 18 Arceburgo 19 Arcos 20 Areado 21 Argirita 22 Aricanduva 23 Ataléia 24 Augusto de Lima 25 Bambuí 26 Bandeira do Sul 27 Barão de Cocais 28 Bela Vista de Minas 29 Belo Horizonte 30 Belo Vale 31 Berilo 32 Berizal 33 Betim 34 Boa Esperança 35 Bocaiuva 36 Bom Despacho 37 Bom Jesus da Penha 38 Bom Repouso 39 Bom Sucesso 40 Bonfim 41 Borda da Mata 42 Botelhos 43 Brás Pires 44 Brumadinho 45 Buenópolis 46 Buritizeiro 47 Cabeceira Grande 48 Cachoeira de Minas 49 Cachoeira de Pajem 50 Cachoeira Dourada 51 Caetanópolis 52 Caeté 53 Caiana 54 Camacho 55 Cambuquira 56 Campo Belo 57 Campo do Meio 58 Campo Florido 59 Canaã 60 Canápolis 61 Candeias 62 Caparaó 63 Capelinha 64 Capinópolis 65 Caputira 66 Carandaí 67 Carbonita 68 Carlos Chagas 69 Carmésia 70 Carmo da Cachoeira 71 Carmo do Cajuru 72 Carneirinho 73 Casa Grande 74 Cascalho Rico 75 Cássia 76 Cataguases 77 Catas altas 78 Catuji 79 Catuti 80 Cedro do Abaete 81 Central de Minas 82 Centralina 83 Chalé 84 Chapada Gaúcha 85 Claraval 86 Cláudio 87 Coluna 88 Comendador Gomes 89 Comercinho 90 Conceição da Barra de Minas 91 Conceição das Alagoas 92 Conceição de Ipanema 93 Conceição do Mato Dentro 94 Confins 95 Conselheiro Lafaiete 96 Conselheiro Pena 97 Consolação 98 Coração
    [Show full text]
  • Minas Gerais
    MINAS GERAIS - UNIDADES INSS - CARTÓRIOS NOME UNIDADE UF MUNICÍPIO ENDEREÇO BAIRRO AGÊNCIA DA PREVIDÊNCIA SOCIAL BELO HORIZONTE - BARREIRO MG BELO HORIZONTE AVENIDA TITO FULGÊNCIO, 104 - BARREIRO AGÊNCIA DA PREVIDÊNCIA SOCIAL BELO HORIZONTE - FLORESTA MG BELO HORIZONTE R PITANGUI, 2052 SAGRADA FAMILIA AGÊNCIA DA PREVIDÊNCIA SOCIAL BELO HORIZONTE - OESTE MG BELO HORIZONTE RUA ESPIRITO SANTO , 54 CENTRO AGÊNCIA DA PREVIDÊNCIA SOCIAL BELO HORIZONTE - PADRE EUSTÁQUIO MG BELO HORIZONTE RUA PADRE EUSTAQUIO, 1831 PADRE EUSTAQUIO AGÊNCIA DA PREVIDÊNCIA SOCIAL BELO HORIZONTE - SANTA EFIGÊNIA MG BELO HORIZONTE RUA DOS TUPINAMBÁS, 351 CENTRO AGÊNCIA DA PREVIDÊNCIA SOCIAL BELO HORIZONTE - SUL MG BELO HORIZONTE RUA DOS GUAICURUS, 312 CENTRO AGÊNCIA DA PREVIDÊNCIA SOCIAL BELO HORIZONTE - VENDA NOVA MG BELO HORIZONTE RUA PADRE EUSTÁQUIO, 1831 PADRE EUSTAQUIO AGÊNCIA DA PREVIDÊNCIA SOCIAL ATENDIMENTO DEMANDAS JUDICIAIS MG BELO HORIZONTE AVENIDA AMAZONAS, 266 CENTRO BELO HORIZONTE AGÊNCIA DA PREVIDÊNCIA SOCIAL BELO HORIZONTE - CALAFATE MG BELO HORIZONTE RUA PADRE EUSTAQUIO, 1831 PADRE EUSTAQUIO AGÊNCIA DA PREVIDÊNCIA SOCIAL TELEATENDIMENTO BELO HORIZONTE MG BELO HORIZONTE R ESPIRITO SANTO 871 CENTRO AGÊNCIA DA PREVIDÊNCIA SOCIAL ATENDIMENTO ACORDOS MG BELO HORIZONTE AVENIDA AMAZONAS, 266 CENTRO INTERNACIONAIS BELO HORIZONTE AGÊNCIA DA PREVIDÊNCIA SOCIAL CEAB RECONHECIMENTO DE DIREITO MG BELO HORIZONTE AV AMAZONAS 266 CENTRO SRII AGÊNCIA DA PREVIDÊNCIA SOCIAL CEAB MANUTENÇÃO DA SR-II MG BELO HORIZONTE AV AMAZONAS CENTRO AGÊNCIA DA PREVIDÊNCIA SOCIAL BARBACENA
    [Show full text]
  • WILDLIFE TRAFFICKING in BRAZIL Sandra Charity and Juliana Machado Ferreira
    July 2020 WILDLIFE TRAFFICKING IN BRAZIL Sandra Charity and Juliana Machado Ferreira TRAFFIC: Wildlife Trade in Brazil WILDLIFE TRAFFICKING IN BRAZIL TRAFFIC, the wildlife trade monitoring network, is a leading non-governmental organisation working globally on trade in wild animals and plants in the context of both biodiversity conservation and sustainable development. © Jaime Rojo / WWF-US Reproduction of material appearing in this report requires written permission from the publisher. The designations of geographical entities in this publication, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of TRAFFIC or its supporting organisations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. TRAFFIC David Attenborough Building, Pembroke Street, Cambridge CB2 3QZ, UK. Tel: +44 (0)1223 277427 Email: [email protected] Suggested citation: Charity, S., Ferreira, J.M. (2020). Wildlife Trafficking in Brazil. TRAFFIC International, Cambridge, United Kingdom. © WWF-Brazil / Zig Koch © TRAFFIC 2020. Copyright of material published in this report is vested in TRAFFIC. ISBN: 978-1-911646-23-5 UK Registered Charity No. 1076722 Design by: Hallie Sacks Cover photo: © Staffan Widstrand / WWF This report was made possible with support from the American people delivered through the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents are the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily
    [Show full text]
  • A Political Tsunami Hits Amazon Conservation
    Received: 29 June 2020 Revised: 4 December 2020 Accepted: 8 January 2021 DOI: 10.1002/aqc.3565 SPECIAL ISSUE ARTICLE A political tsunami hits Amazon conservation Fernando Mayer Pelicice1 | Leandro Castello2 1Núcleo de Estudos Ambientais, Universidade Federal de Tocantins, Porto Nacional, Abstract Tocantins, Brazil 1. The history of conservation of the Amazon can be viewed as a war involving many 2 Department of Fish and Wildlife battles with interests in agribusiness on one side and in biodiversity conservation Conservation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia and sustainability on the other side. Trends in large-scale deforestation in the 1970s spurred a series of policies, stakeholder alliances and international and Correspondence Fernando Mayer Pelicice, Núcleo de Estudos grass-roots movements, which decades later led to the establishment of protected Ambientais, Universidade Federal de areas and interventions in soy and beef supply chains of agribusiness. Together, Tocantins, Rua 3, Quadra 17, Jardim dos Ipês, Porto Nacional, Tocantins 77500-000, Brazil. these advances epitomized a conservation framework for the Amazon, which at Email: [email protected] one point nearly curbed deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon, although it Funding information included very few protections for freshwater ecosystems. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento 2. While those conservation advances were taking place, however, a series of policy Científico e Tecnológico, Grant/Award Number: 306869/2017-9; NSF-Belmont changes started to undermine them through expansions in deforestation, river Forum, Grant/Award Number: 1852113 regulation and mining activities. The election of Brazil's President Jair Bolsonaro in 2019 then hit the Amazon conservation framework much like a tsunami of pol- icy setbacks and the re-establishment of the economic policies that sparked the Amazon war in the past.
    [Show full text]
  • CIDADE SEDE PARA Distancia Km ABAETÉ Abaeté, Minas Gerais 0
    CIDADE SEDE PARA distancia_km ABAETÉ Abaeté, Minas Gerais 0 ABAETÉ Arapuá, Minas Gerais 120,792 ABAETÉ Araújos, Minas Gerais 118,229 ABAETÉ Bambuí, Minas Gerais 147,917 ABAETÉ Biquinhas, Minas Gerais 54,476 ABAETÉ Bom Despacho, Minas Gerais 82,569 ABAETÉ Cachoeira da Prata, Minas Gerais 145,371 ABAETÉ Caetanópolis, Minas Gerais 135,587 ABAETÉ Carmo do Paranaíba, Minas Gerais 137,488 ABAETÉ Cedro do Abaeté, Minas Gerais 35,075 ABAETÉ Conceição do Pará, Minas Gerais 101,089 ABAETÉ Córrego Danta, Minas Gerais 118,6 ABAETÉ Dores do Indaiá, Minas Gerais 45,471 ABAETÉ Estrela do Indaiá, Minas Gerais 76,12 ABAETÉ Igaratinga, Minas Gerais 146,255 ABAETÉ Lagoa da Prata, Minas Gerais 136,392 ABAETÉ Leandro Ferreira, Minas Gerais 119,218 ABAETÉ Luz, Minas Gerais 86,779 ABAETÉ Maravilhas, Minas Gerais 111,284 ABAETÉ Martinho Campos, Minas Gerais 31,301 ABAETÉ Matutina, Minas Gerais 84,523 ABAETÉ Moema, Minas Gerais 122,956 ABAETÉ Morada Nova de Minas, Minas Gerais 84,098 ABAETÉ Nova Serrana, Minas Gerais 127,948 ABAETÉ Onça de Pitangui, Minas Gerais 103,916 ABAETÉ Paineiras, Minas Gerais 40,286 ABAETÉ Papagaios, Minas Gerais 99,834 ABAETÉ Pará de Minas, Minas Gerais 128,526 ABAETÉ Paraopeba, Minas Gerais 133,861 ABAETÉ Pequi, Minas Gerais 125,294 ABAETÉ Perdigão, Minas Gerais 145,96 ABAETÉ Pitangui, Minas Gerais 88,918 ABAETÉ Pompéu, Minas Gerais 59,228 ABAETÉ Quartel Geral, Minas Gerais 21,067 ABAETÉ Rio Paranaíba, Minas Gerais 127,71 ABAETÉ Santa Rosa da Serra, Minas Gerais 106,706 ABAETÉ Santo Antônio do Monte, Minas Gerais 127,807 ABAETÉ São Gonçalo
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Bioproducts in Brazil: Disputes and Agreements on a Common Ground Agenda for Agriculture and Nature Protection
    On the Map Sustainable bioproducts in Brazil: disputes and agreements on a common ground agenda for agriculture and nature protection Gerd Sparovek, University of São Paulo, Piracicaba, Brazil Laura Barcellos Antoniazzi, Agroicone, São Paulo, Brazil Alberto Barretto, Brazilian Bioethanol Science and Technology Laboratory, Campinas, Brazil Ana Cristina Barros, Ministry of Environment of Brazil, Brasília, Brazil Maria Benevides, ANDI Comunicação e Direitos, Brasília, Brazil Göran Berndes, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden Estevão do Prado Braga, Suzano Pulp and Paper, São Paulo, Brazil Miguel Calmon, International Union for Conservation of Nature, Washington D.C., USA Paulo Henrique Groke Jr, Ecofuturo Instituto, São Paulo, Brazil Fábio Nogueira de Avelar Marques, Plantar Carbon, Belo Horizonte, Brazil Mauricio Palma Nogueira, Agroconsult, Florianópolis, Brazil Luis Fernando Guedes Pinto, Imafl ora, Piracicaba, Brazil Vinicius Precioso, Avesso Sustentabilidade, São Paulo, Brazil Received March 3, 2015; revised January 3, 2016; and accepted January 22, 2016 View online at Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com); DOI: 10.1002/bbb.1636; Biofuels, Bioprod. Bioref. (2016) Abstract: A key question for food, biofuels, and bioproducts production is how agriculture affects the environment, and social and economic development. In Brazil, a large agricultural producer and among the biologically wealthiest of nations, this question is challenging and opinions often clash. The Brazilian parliament and several stakeholders have recently debated the revision of the Forest Act, the most important legal framework for conservation of natural vegetation on Brazilian private agricultural lands. Past decades have shown improvements in the agricultural sector with respect to productivity and effi ciency, along with great reductions in deforestation and growth of environmentally certifi ed pro- duction.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Reform and Biodiversity Conservation in Brazil in the 1990S: Conflict and the Articulation of Mutual Interests
    Land Reform and Biodiversity Conservation in Brazil in the 1990s: Conflict and the Articulation of Mutual Interests LAURY CULLEN JR.,∗ KEITH ALGER,† AND DENISE M. RAMBALDI‡ ∗IPE-ˆ Instituto de Pesquisas Ecol´ogicas, C.P. 31, Teodoro Sampaio, SP, Brasil, CEP 19.280-000, S˜ao Paulo, Brasil, email [email protected] †Center for Applied Biodiversity Science, Conservation International, 1919 M Street NW, Suite 600, Washington, D.C. 20036, U.S.A. and Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, Ilh´eus, Bahia, Brasil ‡Associa¸c˜ao Mico-Le˜ao-Dourado, Rodovia BR 101, Km 214, Caixa Postal 109.968, Casimiro de Abreu 28860-970, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil Abstract: Land-reform and environmental movements, revitalized by the democratization of civil society in Brazil in the 1990s, found their objectives in conflict over forested parcels that settlers want for conversion to agriculture but that are important for wildlife conservation. In the Atlantic Forest, where 95% of the forest is gone, we reviewed three cases of Brazilian nongovernmental organization (NGOs) engagement with the land- reform movement with respect to forest remnants neighboring protected areas that have insufficient habitat for the long-term survival of unique endangered species. In the Pontal do Paranapanema (Sao˜ Paulo), Poc¸o das Antas (Rio de Janeiro), and southern Bahia, environmental NGOs have supported agricultural alternatives that improve livelihood options and provide incentives for habitat conservation planning. Where land-reform groups were better organized, technical cooperation on settlement agriculture permitted the exploration of mutual interests in conciliating the productive landscape with conservation objectives. Processes of regular consultation among NGOs, environmental agencies, and the private sector revealed that there was less zero- sum conflict over the same lands than commonly perceived.
    [Show full text]