Local Waterfront Revitalization Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Local Waterfront Revitalization Plan City of Watervliet LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM City of Watervliet Local Waterfront Revitalization Program Table of Contents Table of Contents TABLES AND FIGURES iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS v PREFACE vii I WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION AREA BOUNDARY Existing Coastal Zone Boundary I-01-1 Proposed Revised Boundary I-02-1 Justification for Proposed Changes I-03-1 Harbor Management Boundary Plan Area I-04-1 II INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Watervliet Overview II-01-1 History of the Watervliet Waterfront II-02-1 Watervliet Waterfront Demographic Profile II-03-1 Existing Land and Water Uses II-04-1 Waterfront Area Zoning II-05-1 Recreational Resources II-06-1 Historic Resources II-07-1 Natural Resources II-08-1 Infrastructure II-09-1 Transportation II-10-1 City of Watervliet Local Waterfront Revitalization Program i Table of Contents Issues and Opportunities II-11-1 III WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION POLICIES IV PROPOSED LAND AND WATER USES Proposed Land Use IV-01-1 Proposed Water Uses Harbor Management Plan IV-02-1 Proposed Park Projects IV-03-1 Proposed Projects to Improve Waterfront Accessibility IV-04-1 Proposed Preservation Projects IV-05-1 Proposed Economic Development Projects IV-06-1 Harbor Management Plan IV-07-1 V - TECHNIQUES FOR LOCAL IMPLEMENTATION OF THE WATERFRONT PROGRAM How Existing Plans, Laws and Regulations Implement the LWRP V-01-1 Proposed New or Revised Local Laws and Regulations for LWRP Implementation V-02-1 Other Private Activities Necessary to Implement the LWRPV- 03-1 Management Structure Necessary for Implementation of the Program V-04-1 Procedures to Ensure Local Compliance V-05-1 City of Watervliet Local Waterfront Revitalization Program ii Table of Contents Local Review of State and Federal Actions V-06-1 VI STATE AND FEDERAL ACTIVITIES LIKELY TO AFFECT IMPLEMENTATION VI-01-1 VII OBTAINING LOCAL COMMITMENT FOR THE CITY OF WATERVLIET LWRP VII-01-1 City of Watervliet LWRP Schedule of Lot Area and Width, Height, and Yard Requirements Appendix A City of Watervliet LWRP Area Permitted Zoning Uses Appendix A Draft Watervliet Consistency Law Appendix B Draft Zoning Law Appendix C BIBLIOGRAPHY Appendix D City of Watervliet Local Waterfront Revitalization Program iii Tables and Figures Tables and Figures TABLES 1. Historic and Projected Population Trends II-03-1 2. LWRP Area Population by Race and Ethnicity II-03-2 3. Comparison of Population by Age II-03-3 4. Educational Attainment in LWRP Area II-03-4 5. Household Income II-03-5 6. LWRP Area Residents Employment by Industry II-03-6 7. Resident Occupation II-03-6 8. Journey to Work Comparison II-03-7 9. Value of Specified Owner-Occupied Units II-03-8 10. Housing Inventory II-03-9 11. Historic Resources Inventory II-06-4 12. Interstate 787 Traffic Volumes II-07-6 City of Watervliet LWRP Schedule of Lot Area and, Width, Height, and Yard Requirements Appendix A City of Watervliet LWRP Area Permitted Appendix B Zoning Uses V-02-6 City of Watervliet Local Waterfront Revitalization Program iv Acknowledgements Acknowledgements The City of Watervliet Local Waterfront Revitalization Program Advisory Committee would like to recognize and thank the many people and organizations whose assistance has made the completion of the Program a reality. In addition, the Committee would like to thank the residents of the City who took part in the meetings through attendance and provided feedback on development of the Program. Robert D. Carlson, Mayor William Anderson, Councilman Charles J. Diamond, Councilman Paul S. Murphy, General Manager Nicholas Ostapkovich, Deputy General Manager Gerald Beston, Chief of Police James Bulmer, Water System Supervisor Craig Carlson, Historian Christopher Daus, Director of Recreation David Dressel, Commissioner of Public Works Robert Fahr, Director of Finance Mark R. Gilchrist, Assessor Bruce A. Hidley, City Clerk Joseph F. Monaghan, Corporation Counsel Robert Beston Jr. Paul Healey Anthony Medici Marlene OíBrien David Such Laberge Group 4 Computer Drive West Albany, New York 12205 City of Watervliet Local Waterfront Revitalization Program v Acknowledgements Portions of the history included in this report were originally compiled for the Draft Local Waterfront Revitalization Program report completed for the City of Watervliet in 1985 by the Capital District Regional Planning Commission. Excerpts are from The City of Watervliet 19th Street Corridor Strategic Plan completed for the City of Watervliet in 2003 by The Laberge Group. City of Watervliet Local Waterfront Revitalization Program vi Preface Preface Coastal planning in the United States began with the federal Coastal Planning governmentís adoption of the Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA) in 1972. In that Act, Congress identified specific coastal objectives to promote the protection and wise use of the nationís coasts. The CZMA provides federal assistance to states to develop comprehensive coastal management programs for their coastlines. The New York Coastal Management Program (CMP) was developed and subsequently approved in 1982. In 1981, in order to implement the CMP at the State level, the New York State Legislature passed the Waterfront Revitalization and Coastal Resource Act (Article 42 of the Executive Law). This Act encourages municipalities to work with the State in establishing Local Waterfront Revitalization Programs (LWRPs), and requires State agencies to undertake their actions in a manner consistent with State coastal policies or approved LWRPs. LWRPs are comprehensive plans for a municipality's coastal area, allowing waterfront The Hudson River. municipalities to develop a comprehensive strategy for guiding future development along their shorelines. LWRPs include a locally customized set of policies based on and consistent with the State policies. Once approved by the State (NYS Secretary of State) and the federal government (U.S. Department of Commerce), the policies and purposes of LWRPs replace the more general State policies as LWRPs provide more specific guidance on development, tailored to address the unique challenges and opportunities facing each community. The NYS Department of State Division of Coastal Resources administers the CMP and Local Waterfront Revitalization Program for NYS. The Hudson River and its shoreline as far north as the Introduction Federal Dam in Troy is included in New York State's Coastal Area because the river is a coastal "estuary." As an estuary, the Hudson has an unimpaired connection with the Atlantic Ocean and is influenced by daily tides up to the Troy Dam. The City of Watervliet, located across the Hudson from Troy, has the centerline of the Hudson River as its eastern boundary. The Cityís coastline along the Hudson River extends approximately two miles. City of Watervliet Local Waterfront Revitalization Program vii Preface As a voluntary participant in New York's LWRP, the City of Watervliet first initiated planning for its waterfront in September 1984. The City began a yearlong planning process identifying strategies for developing its Hudson River shoreline. Although several draft LWRP reports were completed, none was ever formally adopted. Reinvigorated by a successful corridor study completed in 2003, the City, in early 2004, decided to reinitiate the process and focus once more on identifying both a vision for its waterfront and the implementation strategies necessary to achieve that vision. The 2004 - 2005 planning effort built upon the process that began in the 1980s. An LWRP Advisory Board was created to guide development of the LWRP. Created in spring 2004 to oversee the Cityís planning process, the LWRP Advisory Board held regular meetings at the Cityís Community Center during the course of the planning process. The LWRP Advisory Board, appointed by the Cityís Mayor, consisted of the following members: • Nick Ostapkovich, Deputy General Manager • Peg Germano • Robert Strohecker • Anthony Medici, Sr. • Joseph Zawistowski • Paul Healey • Ellen Fogarty To support the process, several public visioning meetings were held during the spring and summer of 2004. Advertised via flyers at fraternal organizations, nonprofits, and public buildings including City Hall and the Community Center, and via the local Watervliet television channel WVLT, City of Watervliet Local Waterfront Revitalization Program viii Preface Channel 17, each of the meetings was designed to solicit input from the public on specific issues. The intent behind the first public meeting, held on June 17, was to identify the Watervliet waterfront areaís strengths and weaknesses. The focus of the second public meeting, held on July 7, 2004, was to identify possible opportunities to improve the waterfront area. The final draft plan was presented to the public at a third public meeting, held on July 29. Consistent with the outline identified in the NYS Division of Coastal Resources 2004 Guidebook: Making the Most of Your Waterfront, the Watervliet LWRP contains the following five sections: 1. The Local Waterfront Revitalization Program boundary. 2. An inventory and analysis of existing conditions. 3. Waterfront policies. 4. Proposed land and water uses and projects. 5. Implementation techniques. It should also be noted that this planning process comes on the heels of a number of other widely promoted waterfront planning efforts in the City and region. In early 1997, the City of Watervliet pursued funding from the Small Cities Community Development Block Grant Canal Corridor Initiative to enhance Hudson Shores Park, its riverfront park. Hudson Shores Park, surplus
Recommended publications
  • Brooklyn College and Graduate School of the City University of NY, Brooklyn, NY 11210 and Northeastern Science Foundation Affiliated with Brooklyn College, CUNY, P.O
    FLYSCH AND MOLASSE OF THE CLASSICAL TACONIC AND ACADIAN OROGENIES: MODELS FOR SUBSURFACE RESERVOIR SETTINGS GERALD M. FRIEDMAN Brooklyn College and Graduate School of the City University of NY, Brooklyn, NY 11210 and Northeastern Science Foundation affiliated with Brooklyn College, CUNY, P.O. Box 746, Troy, NY 12181 ABSTRACT This field trip will examine classical sections of the Appalachians including Cambro-Ordovician basin-margin and basin-slope facies (flysch) of the Taconics and braided and meandering stteam deposits (molasse) of the Catskills. The deep­ water settings are part of the Taconic sequence. These rocks include massive sandstones of excellent reservoir quality that serve as models for oil and gas exploration. With their feet, participants may straddle the classical Logan's (or Emmon 's) line thrust plane. The stream deposits are :Middle to Upper Devonian rocks of the Catskill Mountains which resulted from the Acadian Orogeny, where the world's oldest and largest freshwater clams can be found in the world's oldest back-swamp fluvial facies. These fluvial deposits make excellent models for comparable subsurface reservoir settings. INTRODUCTION This trip will be in two parts: (1) a field study of deep-water facies (flysch) of the Taconics, and (2) a field study of braided- and meandering-stream deposits (molasse) of the Catskills. The rocks of the Taconics have been debated for more than 150 years and need to be explained in detail before the field stops make sense to the uninitiated. Therefore several pages of background on these deposits precede the itinera.ry. The Catskills, however, do not need this kind of orientation, hence after the Taconics (flysch) itinerary, the field stops for the Catskills follow immediately without an insertion of background informa­ tion.
    [Show full text]
  • Report Prepared By: ARCADIS US 855 Route 146, Suite 210 Clifton Park, New York 4279011 518-250-7300
    City of Albany 200 Henry Johnson Boulevard Albany, NY 12210 USEPA BROWNFIELDS HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES ASSESSMENT GRANT ASSISTANCE ID No. BF-97249507-0 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment 566 Washington Avenue Albany, New York September 2011 Report Prepared By: ARCADIS US 855 Route 146, Suite 210 Clifton Park, New York 4279011 518-250-7300 Table of Contents Contents Limitations L-1 Certifications C-1 1. Introduction 1-1 1.1. Purpose of ESA ............................................................................................................ 1-1 1.2. General Site Description ............................................................................................... 1-1 1.3. General Vicinity Description .......................................................................................... 1-2 1.4. Physical Environmental Setting .................................................................................... 1-2 1.4.1. General Topography ..................................................................................... 1-2 1.4.2. Geology and Soils ......................................................................................... 1-2 1.4.3. Surface Water and Wetlands ........................................................................ 1-3 1.4.4. Hydrogeology ................................................................................................ 1-3 2. Records Review (40 CFR §312.24, 312.25 & 312.26) 2-1 2.1. Site Contact Information ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • CDTC NEW VISIONS 2050 FREIGHT WHITE PAPER February 2020 DRAFT
    CDTC NEW VISIONS 2050 FREIGHT WHITE PAPER February 2020 DRAFT Capital District Transportation Committee One Park Place Albany NY 12205 518-458-2161 www.cdtcmpo.org CDTC Freight White Paper Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 3 CDTC Regional Freight Plan (2016) ........................................................................................................... 4 Freight Advisory Committee ..................................................................................................................... 4 Freight Planning & Investment Principle ...................................................................................................... 5 Freight Priority Network ............................................................................................................................... 5 FPN Route Designation Methodology....................................................................................................... 6 Truck Count Data .................................................................................................................................. 6 National Highway System (NHS) Criteria .............................................................................................. 6 Criteria from Other US Studies ............................................................................................................. 7 Land Use Connections ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Guidebook: American Revolution
    Guidebook: American Revolution UPPER HUDSON Bennington Battlefield State Historic Site http://nysparks.state.ny.us/sites/info.asp?siteId=3 5181 Route 67 Hoosick Falls, NY 12090 Hours: May-Labor Day, daily 10 AM-7 PM Labor Day-Veterans Day weekends only, 10 AM-7 PM Memorial Day- Columbus Day, 1-4 p.m on Wednesday, Friday and Saturday Phone: (518) 279-1155 (Special Collections of Bailey/Howe Library at Uni Historical Description: Bennington Battlefield State Historic Site is the location of a Revolutionary War battle between the British forces of Colonel Friedrich Baum and Lieutenant Colonel Henrick von Breymann—800 Brunswickers, Canadians, Tories, British regulars, and Native Americans--against American militiamen from Massachusetts, Vermont, and New Hampshire under Brigadier General John Stark (1,500 men) and Colonel Seth Warner (330 men). This battle was fought on August 16, 1777, in a British effort to capture American storehouses in Bennington to restock their depleting provisions. Baum had entrenched his men at the bridge across the Walloomsac River, Dragoon Redoubt, and Tory Fort, which Stark successfully attacked. Colonel Warner's Vermont militia arrived in time to assist Stark's reconstituted force in repelling Breymann's relief column of some 600 men. The British forces had underestimated the strength of their enemy and failed to get the supplies they had sought, weakening General John Burgoyne's army at Saratoga. Baum and over 200 men died and 700 men surrendered. The Americans lost 30 killed and forty wounded The Site: Hessian Hill offers picturesque views and interpretative signs about the battle. Directions: Take Route 7 east to Route 22, then take Route 22 north to Route 67.
    [Show full text]
  • State Environmental Quality Review (Seqr) Environmental Assessment Form Supplement Global Albany Terminal
    STATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEW (SEQR) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM SUPPLEMENT GLOBAL ALBANY TERMINAL GLOBAL COMPANIES LLC - ALBANY TERMINAL 50 Church St Albany, NY 12202 DEC PERMIT APPLICATION #4-0101-00070/02003 March 2020 Prepared by: 349 Northern Blvd, Suite 3 Albany, New York 12204 Unauthorized alteration or addition to this Document is a violation of Section 7209 ©Copyright 2020 Subdivision 2 of the New York State Education Law Envirospec Engineering, PLLC Global Albany Terminal Page 1 EAF Supplement March 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 5 2.0 FACILITY DESCRIPTION ..................................................................................................... 6 2.1 Facility Location (EAF Sections A, C, & E) ......................................................................6 2.2 Description of Terminal (EAF Section A) ..........................................................................8 2.3 Description of Project (EAF Sections A, D.1, & D.2) ......................................................9 2.4 Description of SEQR Process ..........................................................................................14 3.0 ZONING/LAND USE AND CONSISTENCY WITH LOCAL/REGIONAL PLANS ...... 18 3.1 Zoning/Land Use (EAF Sections C.3 & E.1) ..................................................................18 3.2 Consistency with City of Albany Comprehensive Plan (EAF Section C.2a) .............19
    [Show full text]
  • UPDATED COMMUNITY RELATIONS PLAN WATERVLIET ARSENAL, Watervliet, New York
    FINAL UPDATED COMMUNITY RELATIONS PLAN WATERVLIET ARSENAL, Watervliet, New York RCRA FACILITY INVESTIGATIONS AND CORRECTIVE MEASURES AT SIBERIA AREA AND MAIN MANUFACTURING AREA Baltimore Corps of Engineers Baltimore, Maryland Prepared by: Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. 15 Cornell Road Latham, New York 12110 October 2000 0285-701 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND...........................................................1-1 1.1 Site Location.................................................................................................1-3 1.2 Site History...................................................................................................1-3 1.3 Environmental Studies....................................................................................1-6 2.0 COMMUNITY BACKGROUND..........................................................................2-1 2.1 Community Demographics and Employment...................................................2-1 2.2 Community Involvement History....................................................................2-4 2.3 Community Interview Program.......................................................................2-7 2.4 Community Issues and Concerns .................................................................2-16 2.5 Technical Assistance Grants.........................................................................2-18 3.0 COMMUNITY RELATIONS PROGRAM............................................................3-1 3.1 Goals and Objectives ....................................................................................3-1
    [Show full text]
  • Pavement Condition Assessment V2.0W
    NYSDOT Network Level Pavement Condition Assessment V2.0w Surface Distress Rating Ride Quality (IRI) Pavement Condition Index IRI Deduct 35 30 IRI >170 in/mi y = 1.08 (9E-06x3 - 0.0075x2 + 2.0532x - 154.37) 25 20 IRI <170 in/mi y = 0.90 (2E-06x3 + 0.0004x2 + 0.0596x - 5.2585) 15 DeductValue 10 5 0 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 IRI (in/mi) New York State Department of Transportation i Network Level Pavement Condition Assessment Preface This document describes the procedures used by the New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT) to assess and quantify network-level pavement condition. There are four general facets of pavement condition: surface distress, ride quality, structural capacity and friction. Because the data collection tools currently available to measure structural capacity and friction are not efficient for network-level data collection, the NYSDOT condition assessment procedures are limited to certain surface distresses and to ride quality. Network-level data for these condition factors is readily available through ongoing data collection programs. Information about pavement condition and performance is critical to the decision making that occurs to successfully manage highway pavements. Accurate and timely data is used to assess system performance and deterioration, identify maintenance and reconstruction needs, and determine financing requirements. The annual assessment and reporting of pavement conditions is required by the New York State Highway Law (§ 2 Section 10). NYSDOT has assessed pavement surface distress information annually on 100% of the state highway system using a visual windshield rating system since 1981. The original paper-based collection procedure was replaced in 2004 with the E-Score electronic recording system.
    [Show full text]
  • NYSSA Bulletin 131-132 2017-2018
    David R. Starbuck, Editor ISSN 1046-2368 The New York State Archaeological Association2018 Officers Lisa Marie Anselmi, President David Moyer, Vice President Gail Merian, Secretary Ann Morton, Treasurer The views expressed in this volume are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position of the publisher. Published by the New York State Archaeological Association. Subscription by membership in NYSAA. For membership information write: President Lisa Anselmi, [email protected]; 716 878-6520 Back numbers may be obtained from [email protected]; 716 878-6520 Or downloaded from the NYSAA website http://nysarchaeology.org/nysaa/ Entire articles or excerpts may be reprinted upon notification to the NYSAA. Manuscripts should be submitted to Dr. David Starbuck, P.O. Box 492, Chestertown, NY 12817. If you are thinking of submitting an item for publication, please note that manuscripts will be returned for correction if manuscript guidelines (this issue) are not followed. Authors may request peer review. All manuscripts submitted are subject to editorial correction or excision where such correction or excision does not alter substance or intent. Layout and Printing Mechanical Prep, Publishing Help by Dennis Howe, Concord, New Hampshire Printed by Speedy Printing, Concord, New Hampshire. Copyright ©2018 by the New York State Archaeological Association Front Cover Photographs The collage of photographs on the front cover are taken from several of the articles in this issue of The Bulletin, which are devoted to the growth and development of the New York State Archaeological Association (NYSAA) over the last hundred years. The collage is a small representation of the many men and women from diverse disciplines who made major archaeological discoveries, established scientific approaches to archaeological studies, and contributed to the formation of NYSAA.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Projects in Your Neighborhood
    Transportation Projects in Your Neighborhood Major PIN Contract Number Region 000616 D263845 10 LONG ISLAND 000822 10 LONG ISLAND 000823 10 LONG ISLAND 001145 D264139 10 LONG ISLAND 001627 D263744 10 LONG ISLAND 001767 D264097 10 LONG ISLAND 001768 10 LONG ISLAND 003014 D264134 10 LONG ISLAND 004241 D264048 10 LONG ISLAND 004242 D264049 10 LONG ISLAND 004243 10 LONG ISLAND 005409 10 LONG ISLAND Page 1 of 1260 09/25/2021 Transportation Projects in Your Neighborhood Project Title OP SHARED USE PATH TOBAY TO CAPTREE South Ferry Dock at NY114 Improvements NY114 Pavement Resurfacing Stephen Hands Path to South Ferry NY231 LAKE TO I495 CONCRETE PAVEMENT REPAIR NY112 RECONS I495 TO GRANNY RD RMC/FIRE ISLAND INLET BRIDGE REHAB RMC Rustic Rail Replacement NY27A to SSP NY454 DRAINAGE FEUEREISEN TO JOHNSON NY25 PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS NY25/NY107 BRIDGE REHAB NY25 Intersection Improvement at Coram/Mt. Sinai Rd. NY347 RECONST HALLOCK RD TO CR97 Page 2 of 1260 09/25/2021 Transportation Projects in Your Neighborhood Project Description Construction of 3rd phase of 14 mile shared-use path along the north side of Ocean Parkway. Phase 3 extends between TOBAY and Captree State Park Towns of Oyster Bay, Islip and Babylon, Nassau and Suffolk Counties Improve South Ferry Dock at NY114 including reconstruction of the approach to meet the new dock elevation, drainage improvements, replacement of existing bulkhead and elevation of adjacent gravel parking area, Town of Southampton, Suffolk County. NY114 Pavement Resurfacing from Stephen Hands Path to South Ferry, Towns of East Hampton and Southampton, Suffolk County. Concrete Pavement repair including joint sealing, diamond grinding, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • The Army Needs to Establish Priorities, Goals, and Performance Measures for Its Arsenal Support Program Initiative
    United States Government Accountability Office Washington, DC 20548 November 5, 2009 The Honorable Carl Levin Chairman The Honorable John McCain Ranking Member Committee on Armed Services United States Senate The Honorable Ike Skelton Chairman The Honorable Howard McKeon Ranking Member Committee on Armed Services House of Representatives Subject: DEFENSE INFRASTRUCTURE: The Army Needs to Establish Priorities, Goals, and Performance Measures for Its Arsenal Support Program Initiative The Army has three government-owned and operated manufacturing arsenals that it considers vital to the Department of Defense’s (DOD) industrial base because they provide products or services that are either unavailable from private industry or ensure a ready and controlled source of technical competence and resources in case of national defense contingencies or other emergencies. These three arsenals are Pine Bluff Arsenal, Arkansas; Rock Island Arsenal, Illinois; and Watervliet Arsenal, New York. Pine Bluff’s core mission is the production of conventional ammunition and other types of munitions. Rock Island’s core mission is weapons manufacturing, and the arsenal is home to the Army’s only remaining foundry. Watervliet is the Army’s only cannon maker and also produces other armaments and mortars. Historically, the Army’s arsenals have generally had vacant or underutilized space. For many years the Army has not provided the capital investment needed to keep pace with modern manufacturing requirements and retain core skills in the arsenal workforce. Additionally, the arsenals have generally had lower workloads during peacetime, but since the onset of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan they have experienced a surge in workloads to provide vital manufacturing capabilities, such as producing armor kits to harden Army personnel vehicles after it was found that the Army’s existing vehicles were susceptible to improvised explosive devices.
    [Show full text]
  • MINUTES of a REGULAR MEETING MONDAY, May 3, 2021 the Common Council Was Convened at 7:00 P.M. and Was Called to Order by Preside
    MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING MONDAY, May 3, 2021 The Common Council was convened at 7:00 p.m. and was called to order by President Ellis. This meeting was held following Governor Cuomo’s executive order 202.1 and it live-streamed on Facebook using Zoom as the meeting platform. If we experience any technical difficulties on Facebook, the video will be streamed to YouTube. The roll being called, the following answered to their names: Anane, Balarin, Doesschate, Fahey, Farrell, Flynn, Frederick, Hoey, Igoe, Kimbrough, Love, O’Brien, and Robinson Also present was the following staff: Danielle Gillespie, John-Raphael Pichardo, and Brett Williams Council President Ellis led the Pledge of Allegiance. PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD 1. Lauren Manning, 8 Tyler Trice Terrace, Albany, NY 12207 (Encampment on Arch Street and comments made by APD Police Chief) 2. Kelsey Whittington, 6 S. Lake Ave., Albany, NY (Local Law C) 3. Marco Flagg, 500 Park Ave, Albany, NY (Local Law C) 4. Robert Distelcamp III, Ward 6 near food co-op (Police responses to civilians and Local Law C) 5. Melanie Trimble, 41 State Street, Albany, NY 12207 (Local Law C) 6. Klarisse Torriente, 295 Hudson Ave, Albany, NY (Local Law C) 7. Sandra Steubing, 44 Summit Ave, Albany, NY 12209 (Climate Resolution, Local Law C, Racism in the Police Force) 8. Nairobi Vives-Chair of CPRB, 3 White Oak Ln, Albany, NY (Local Law C) 9. Sheina Saeger, 411 Ninth Street, Troy, NY (Encampment on Arch Street and Local Law C) 10. Juelz Figuereo & Mikala Foster, Saratoga Springs (Encampment on Arch Street, Social Justice, APD, Arrest of protesters during the first encampment) President Pro Tempore Kimbrough made a motion to extend public comment period for an additional 30 minutes, which was approved by unanimous voice consent.
    [Show full text]
  • Freeze-Up Ice Jams
    ICE JAM REFERENCE AND TROUBLE SPOTS Ice Jam Reference Ice jams cause localized flooding and can quickly cause serious problems in the NWS Albany Hydrologic Service Area (HSA). Rapid rises behind the jams can lead to temporary lakes and flooding of homes and roads along rivers. A sudden release of a jam can lead to flash flooding below with the addition of large pieces of ice in the wall of water which will damage or destroy most things in its path. Ice jams are of two forms: Freeze up and Break up. Freeze up jams usually occur early to mid winter during extremely cold weather. Break up jams usually occur mid to late winter with thaws. NWS Albany Freeze Up Jam Criteria: Three Consecutive Days with daily average temperatures <= 0°F NWS Albany Break Up Jam Criteria: 1) Ice around 1 foot thick or more? And 2) Daily Average Temperature forecast to be >= 42°F or more? Daily Average Temperature = (Tmax+Tmin)/2 Rainfall/snowmelt with a thaw will enhance the potential for break up jams as rising water helps to lift and break up the ice. A very short thaw with little or no rain/snowmelt may not be enough to break up thick ice. ** River forecasts found at: http://water.weather.gov/ahps2/forecasts.php?wfo=aly will not take into account the effect of ice. ** Ice jams usually form in preferred locations in the NWS Albany HSA. See the “Ice Jam Trouble Spots” below for a list of locations where ice jams frequently occur. Ice Jam Trouble Spots **This is not an all inclusive list, but rather a list of locations where ice jams have been reported in the past.
    [Show full text]