DOCSLIB.ORG

0727 Cyrus Obrien Dissertation FINAL

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
0727 Cyrus Obrien Dissertation FINAL Redeeming Imprisonment: Religion and the Development of Mass Incarceration in Florida by Cyrus J. O’Brien A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Anthropology and History) in the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 2018 Doctoral Committee: Professor Matthew Lassiter, Chair Associate Professor Stephen Berrey Professor Paul C. Johnson Professor Stuart Kirsch Professor Heather Ann Thompson Cyrus J. O’Brien [email protected] [email protected] ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0620-0938 © Cyrus J. O’Brien 2018 Acknowledgements Acknowledgements are the first thing I read when I pick up a book or browse through a dissertation, and they always put me in a good mood. I love the ways they speak to networks of camaraderie, convey thanks to amazing mentors, pay homage to intellectual genealogies, acknowledge long-lasting relationships to people and places, situate the author institutionally, and celebrate friendships and other joys of life. Like many dissertation writers, I have many relationships to celebrate and much to be grateful for. What follows is a woefully inadequate message of thanks. First and foremost, I thank the people who helped with this research whom I am unable to name. Scores of incarcerated and formerly incarcerated people helped me figure out what was happening in Florida prisons, and I am indebted to each of them. I also want to thank the many volunteers and prison staff who generously talked with me, answered my questions, and helped me understand their work and lives. I particularly want to thank the handful of men at Wakulla who transcended the roles of “research participants” to become my friends and collaborators. I truly enjoyed my time with you, and your insights and “suggestions for further reading” are woven through the whole of this manuscript. More broadly, your generosity, perseverance, and determination to live your lives with dignity whatever the circumstances inspire me and represent ii the best of human potential. I have learned so much from you, and your presences in my life are great blessings. Wow. I could not have imagined—and could never have expected—to work with such a fantastic committee. Each member has brought invaluable advice, expertise, perspective, and friendship. Since my first semester at Michigan, Stephen Berrey helped me cultivate writerly voices and dispositions and I especially thank him for his help in the past six months thinking through the implications of the project. Paul Johnson deserves much of the credit for getting me to think creatively and expansively about religion. Stuart Kirsch is a model for the engaged scholar I aspire to be, and his encouragement to be persistent during the early months of fieldwork before I had access to archives or fieldsites was pivotal. Heather Thompson’s encouragement gave me the courage to write about religion in the criminal justice system and brought clarity to a murky project. Matthew Lassiter has had a profound impact on my thinking, teaching, and intellectual being. I’m still trying to figure out how he does it, but he always seems to know when to push, support, question, challenge, and champion his students and their work. Matt, thank you. I also thank Alaina Lemon, Jason De Leon, Deidre de la Cruz, Gillian Feeley-Harnik, Matthew Countryman, Webb Keane, Bruce Manheim, Hakem Al-Rustom, John Carson, Geoff Eley, Kali Israel, Judy Irvine, Andrew Shryock, Damani Partridge, and Liz Roberts for advancing this project through their teaching and generous conversations. I am fortunate to be intellectually in the wake of Lorna Rhodes, Charles Bright, and Ethan Blue; I am even more indebted to them for their feedback and considered commentary. All three read portions of this dissertation or a related article, and the manuscript and arguments are stronger for their interventions. Thank you. iii I have benefited from a wealth of institutional support. This research would not have been possible without generous funding from the National Science Foundation’s Graduate Research Fellowship Program, the Wenner-Gren Foundation, the Charlotte Newcombe Foundation, and the Rackham Graduate School at the University of Michigan. A summer grant from the Anti-Discrimination Center in 2012 significantly influenced my research trajectory and I owe the ADC a special thanks. I am also indebted to the Graduate Employees’ Organization at the University of Michigan for ensuring my access to health care and a living wage. Thanks also to the leadership and members of the Teamsters and the Greater Detroit Building and Construction Trades Council and many members of the Lecturers’ Employee Organization; American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees; and the University of Michigan Skilled Trades Union who supported GEO during contract negotiations: We owe you one. Rosanne Crompton and Marcy Boughton literally kept me running through the whole process. Kathleen King and Diana Denny provided instrumental help and guidance as I learned to navigate the University; the external funding in my first year would never have materialized if not for a chance encounter with Diana in the kitchen and her knowledge of the existence of a letter in a file. I am indebted to Steve Volk, who, at Oberlin College, taught me the historian’s craft with incredible generosity and with a love for teaching and learning. Much of this dissertation is based on research in archives and in physical settings where access can be a significant challenge. I am extraordinarily grateful to the people who opened doors to me at the Florida Department of Corrections, the Florida Commission on Offender Review (formerly the Parole Commission), the Salvation Army, Christian Prison Ministries, Inc., and other institutions. I thank in particular David Ensley, Jan MacMahon, John McMahon, Ilse Yost, Newland Smith, Lori Constantino-Brown, Charles Brown, Jim Williams, Michael Manguso, Allison DeFoor, Louie Wainwright, Jack Murphy, and Tina Pate. I also thank Mary iv Donnelly and Mary Ramirez at the University of Michigan’s Institutional Review Board for their incredible help in navigating a sometimes tricky approval process. The state of Florida is a better place because of the work of wonderful archivists and librarians at the State Archives and the State Library. Thanks especially to Miriam Spalding, Anya Grosenbaugh, James “Hendry” Miller, and Blake Robinson; their expertise strengthened this project immeasurably. I owe an enormous debt to Sarah Rumph who, as General Counsel of the Parole Commission, jumped through hoops to make me an intern of her office to provide me unprecedented access to the state’s records. Sarah is as big a champion of open government as she is a kind and generous person. I am blessed to count her and her husband Jerry as friends. I have enjoyed so many wonderful and intellectually stimulating times in Ann Arbor. I especially thank Brady G’sell, Aaron Seaman, Aaron Michka, Georgia Ennis, Gurveen Khurana, Anna McCourt, Jessica Hill, Obed Garcia, Prash Naidu, Haydar Darici, Scott De Orio, Davide “Little Bears” Orsini, Farida Begum, Bruno Renero-Hannan, Ronit Stahl, Austin McCoy, Nora Krinitsky, Andrew Rutledge, Joost van Eynde, Sofie van Gestle, Lori Roddy, Nishita Trisal, Jessica Lowen, Walker Elliot, and many more. Randeep Hothi was a generous collaborator who read drafts of several chapters. Josh Mound saved my graduate career before it began, then he and Shannon McLeod became dear friends. Robyn d’Avignon, Ismail Alatas, and Kimberly Powers were enormously helpful as a navigated the landscapes of grants and jobs, and Dan Birchok has been my rock of molten lava. (I don’t know what that means exactly, but he thinks it sounds cool. And Dan truly is awesome.) Katie Taylor and David Organes brought joy and camaraderie to my time in Tallahassee, and Leisa Peach warmly welcomed me into her home. In Yogyakarta, I shared great music, wonderful food, and an inordinate number of laughs with Rustiyadi, Nike Parandyani, Szu-Han “Queeny” Liang, and Yan, Maverick, and Calista v Setiawan. I enjoyed great times in many places with Jake Grossman, Nils Fischer, and Brian Youngblood. I am indebted to many colleagues and mentors in the world of criminal justice reform. Deborrah Brodsky has been an amazing mentor. Our collaborations now span eight years and they are some of the work I am proudest of. I owe Deb much of the credit for the parts of this dissertation that are politically relevant and I am incredibly grateful to be in her orbit. Danielle Lipow’s decision to hire me ten years ago was one of the luckiest things to happen in my career. In the time since, Danielle and Zoe Savitsky have become sisters to me. I aspire to their moral groundedness and their abilities to make critical and nuanced distinctions amid the chaos of American criminal and juvenile justice systems. I learned many of the ins and outs of prisons from David Utter while we investigated juvenile prisons in Florida. I also am indebted to Bart Lubow, Nate Balis, Richard Doran, Rachel Gassert, Allison DeFoor, and Simone Marstiller for their support and friendship. I feel immense gratitude towards Emma Nolan-Thomas. Throughout the research and writing, she has lovingly challenged me to hold fast to my convictions and to question my preconceptions. She has listened to more talk about halfway houses than anyone ever should, and she has turned muddled thoughts to insight and brought clarity to confusing formulations. Thanks, Yem. This dissertation is Round One in a lifelong series of collaborations with people who have grown dear to my heart, and with others whom I will meet in other ports of call. All the mistakes are my own. I am profoundly grateful for the relationships this work has brought into my life and I am looking forward to exciting futures.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SAY NO to the LIBERAL MEDIA: CONSERVATIVES and CRITICISM of the NEWS MEDIA in the 1970S William Gillis Submitted to the Faculty
    SAY NO TO THE LIBERAL MEDIA: CONSERVATIVES AND CRITICISM OF THE NEWS MEDIA IN THE 1970S William Gillis Submitted to the faculty of the University Graduate School in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in the School of Journalism, Indiana University June 2013 ii Accepted by the Graduate Faculty, Indiana University, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Doctoral Committee David Paul Nord, Ph.D. Mike Conway, Ph.D. Tony Fargo, Ph.D. Khalil Muhammad, Ph.D. May 10, 2013 iii Copyright © 2013 William Gillis iv Acknowledgments I would like to thank the helpful staff members at the Brigham Young University Harold B. Lee Library, the Detroit Public Library, Indiana University Libraries, the University of Kansas Kenneth Spencer Research Library, the University of Louisville Archives and Records Center, the University of Michigan Bentley Historical Library, the Wayne State University Walter P. Reuther Library, and the West Virginia State Archives and History Library. Since 2010 I have been employed as an editorial assistant at the Journal of American History, and I want to thank everyone at the Journal and the Organization of American Historians. I thank the following friends and colleagues: Jacob Groshek, Andrew J. Huebner, Michael Kapellas, Gerry Lanosga, J. Michael Lyons, Beth Marsh, Kevin Marsh, Eric Petenbrink, Sarah Rowley, and Cynthia Yaudes. I also thank the members of my dissertation committee: Mike Conway, Tony Fargo, and Khalil Muhammad. Simply put, my adviser and dissertation chair David Paul Nord has been great. Thanks, Dave. I would also like to thank my family, especially my parents, who have provided me with so much support in so many ways over the years.
    [Show full text]
  • Armstrong Racial Origins Aug 18 2016 Submitted
    Racial Origins of Doctrines Limiting Prisoner Protest Speech Andrea C. Armstrong* ABSTRACT This article examines the racial origins of two foundational cases governing prisoner protest speech to better understand their impact in light of the Black Lives Matter movement. Two Supreme Court cases provide the primary architecture for the regulation of prisoner or detainee speech. The first, Adderley v. Florida, is (mis)interpreted for the proposition that jails (and by analogy, prisons) are non-public spaces. Under First Amendment doctrine, non-public spaces are subject to heightened regulation and suppression of speech is authorized. The second, Jones v. North Carolina Prisoners’ Labor Union, Inc., amplifies the effect of Adderley and prohibits prisoner solicitation for union membership. Together, these two cases effectively provide broad discretion to prison administrators to punish prisoners and detainees for their protest speech. Neither Adderley nor Jones acknowledge the racial origins of the cases. Holdings in both cases relied on race-neutral rationales and analysis and yet, the underlying concerns in each case appear tied to racial concerns and fears. Thus this Article is a continuation of a broader critical race praxis that reminds us that seemingly objective and neutral doctrines themselves may incorporate particular ideas and notions about race. Today’s protesters face a demonstrably different doctrinal landscape, should they protest within the prison or jail walls. While the content of speech by a “Black Lives Matter” activist may not change, the constitutional protection afforded to that speech will be radically different depending on where she speaks. * Associate Professor of Law, Loyola University New Orleans College of Law.
    [Show full text]
  • Lassiter Cv March 2020 Copy
    Curriculum Vitae Matthew D. Lassiter Department of History (734) 546-0799 1029 Tisch Hall [email protected] University of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI 48109 Education __________________________________________________ Ph.D., Department of History, University of Virginia, Charlottesville VA, May 1999. Dissertation: “The Rise of the Suburban South: The ‘Silent Majority’ and the Politics of Education, 1945-1975.” M.A., Department of History, University of Virginia, Jan. 1994. Thesis: “Biblical Fundamentalism and Racial Beliefs at Bob Jones University.” B.A., History, summa cum laude, Furman University, Greenville SC, May 1992. Employment/Teaching ________________________________________ Professor of History, University of Michigan, 2017- Arthur F. Thurnau Professor (since 2015) Associate Professor of History, University of Michigan, 2006-2017 Assistant Professor of History, University of Michigan, 2000-2006 Professor of Urban and Regional Planning, University of Michigan, 2017- Associate Professor of Urban and Regional Planning, 2006-2017 Director of Policing and Social Justice Lab, University of Michigan, 2018- Director of Undergraduate Studies, History Department, 2012-2014 Director of Graduate Studies, History Department, 2006-2008 History 202: “Doing History” (undergraduate methods seminar). History 261: “U.S. History Since 1865” (lecture). History 329: “Crime and Drugs in Modern America” (lecture/‘flipped’ class format). History 364: “History of American Suburbia” (lecture). History 467: “U.S. History Since 1945” (lecture). History/American Culture 374: “Politics and Culture of the Sixties” (lecture). History 196: “Political Culture of Cold War America” (undergraduate seminar). History 399: “Environmental Activism in Michigan” (undergraduate seminar). History 399: “Cold Cases: Police Violence, Crime, and Social Justice in Michigan” (undergraduate HistoryLab seminar) History 497: “War on Crime/War on Drugs” (undergraduate seminar).
    [Show full text]
  • Marion Prison We Don't Want Lobe Helpless
    1HI Sheer hopelessness, llosignalinn You lead il in Ihe faces. Before the fad. hefore CATHOLIC WORKER Hie attempt lo do somcluhtg, all of modem life, at its boiling, tossing center, seems ori;an or tiif. catholic worker imovi.imi.nt hopeless. Acceded, admitted lo, Hie bent TETEn MAUniN. Founder bends, cop-otd, rclrcal. jogging heallh spas, kids' games for adults, homeinaking. DOROTHY DAY, Editor and Publisher money making . Hesislance is hopeless, DANIEl MAUK, PEGGY SCHERER, Managing Editors a wasle. 'They' are loo big. omnivorous, powerful. Our side has no one. no motley, Vol. Xl.iv. No. ? no energy, oleolorn, etcetera. The etceteras September, 1978 would fill a Kelly girl's (sic) wasle haskol with a macho sluller. Marion Prison We don't want lobe helpless. We don'l •• waul to be inarticulate. We don't ward lo be ell the slreef. We tfon'1 wnnf lo sit alone Hell In a Very Small .Space in a box, be shunted around in cuffs. We don'l want lo be losers. We don"! ward to ny DANIEL BEMUGAN. S.J.' selves, we awl the havoc we wreak We, and (he needful victims of--we. die. even a tittle. We want, maybe. In talk Wtffinn nhiwH prisoners is n lilllo like A like fear and trembling arises at (he about the poor, or prisoners, or refugees, nrilitig about the dead: the mass dead, spectacle or political prisoners. To Ihc out or Hie ghotloizod lo write about litem, or lite unknown mid unknowable, limn* killpcl commiserate, or (on occasion) leaflet al a in disasters like Managua or Nagasaki or side worlds, prison is somewhat like a can prison, or-proles! the dentil penally.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Mass Incarceration Matters: Rethinking Crisis, Decline, and Transformation in Postwar American History
    Why Mass Incarceration Matters: Rethinking Crisis, Decline, and Transformation in Postwar American History Heather Ann Thompson As the twentieth century came to a close and the twenty-first began, something occurred in the United States that was without international parallel or historical precedent. Be- tween 1970 and 2010 more people were incarcerated in the United States than were imprisoned in any other country, and at no other point in its past had the nation’s eco- nomic, social, and political institutions become so bound up with the practice of punish- ment. By 2006 more than 7.3 million Americans had become entangled in the criminal justice system. The American prison population had by that year increased more rapidly than had the resident population as a whole, and one in every thirty-one U.S. residents was under some form of correctional supervision, such as in prison or jail, or on proba- tion or parole. As importantly, the incarcerated and supervised population of the United States was, overwhelmingly, a population of color. African American men experienced the highest imprisonment rate of all racial groups, male or female. It was 6.5 times the rate of white males and 2.5 times that of Hispanic males. By the middle of 2006 one in fifteen black men over the age of eighteen were behind bars as were one in nine black men aged twenty to thirty-four. The imprisonment rate of African American women looked little better. It was almost double that of Hispanic women and three times the rate of white women.1 Despite the fact that ten times more Americans were imprisoned in the last decade of the twentieth century than were killed during the Vietnam War (591,298 versus 58,228), and even though a greater number of African Americans had ended up in penal institu- tions than in institutions of higher learning by the new millennium (188,500 more), his- torians have largely ignored the mass incarceration of the late twentieth century and have not yet begun to sort out its impact on the social, economic, and political evolution of the postwar period.
    [Show full text]
  • Mandy Diss Post-Defense Word
    Silencing the Cell Block: The Making of Modern Prison Policy in North Carolina and the Nation by Amanda Bell Hughett Department of History Duke University Date: July 7, 2017 Approved: ___________________________ Nancy MacLean, Supervisor ___________________________ Laura F. Edwards ___________________________ Edward Balleisen ___________________________ Christopher W. Schmidt ___________________________ Heather Ann Thompson Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of History in the Graduate School of Duke University 2017 ABSTRACT Silencing the Cell Block: The Making of Modern Prison Policy in North Carolina and the Nation by Amanda Bell Hughett Department of History Duke University Date: July 7, 2017 Approved: ___________________________ Nancy MacLean, Supervisor ___________________________ Laura F. Edwards ___________________________ Edward Balleisen ___________________________ Christopher W. Schmidt ___________________________ Heather Ann Thompson An abstract of a dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of History in the Graduate School of Duke University 2017 Copyright by Amanda Bell Hughett 2017 Abstract “Silencing the Cell Block” examines the relationship between imprisoned activists and civil liberties lawyers from the 1960s to the present in order to solve a puzzle central to the United States’ peculiar criminal justice system: Why do American prisons, despite affording
    [Show full text]
  • AHA Colloquium
    Cover.indd 1 13/10/20 12:51 AM Thank you to our generous sponsors: Platinum Gold Bronze Cover2.indd 1 19/10/20 9:42 PM 2021 Annual Meeting Program Program Editorial Staff Debbie Ann Doyle, Editor and Meetings Manager With assistance from Victor Medina Del Toro, Liz Townsend, and Laura Ansley Program Book 2021_FM.indd 1 26/10/20 8:59 PM 400 A Street SE Washington, DC 20003-3889 202-544-2422 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.historians.org Perspectives: historians.org/perspectives Facebook: facebook.com/AHAhistorians Twitter: @AHAHistorians 2020 Elected Officers President: Mary Lindemann, University of Miami Past President: John R. McNeill, Georgetown University President-elect: Jacqueline Jones, University of Texas at Austin Vice President, Professional Division: Rita Chin, University of Michigan (2023) Vice President, Research Division: Sophia Rosenfeld, University of Pennsylvania (2021) Vice President, Teaching Division: Laura McEnaney, Whittier College (2022) 2020 Elected Councilors Research Division: Melissa Bokovoy, University of New Mexico (2021) Christopher R. Boyer, Northern Arizona University (2022) Sara Georgini, Massachusetts Historical Society (2023) Teaching Division: Craig Perrier, Fairfax County Public Schools Mary Lindemann (2021) Professor of History Alexandra Hui, Mississippi State University (2022) University of Miami Shannon Bontrager, Georgia Highlands College (2023) President of the American Historical Association Professional Division: Mary Elliott, Smithsonian’s National Museum of African American History and Culture (2021) Nerina Rustomji, St. John’s University (2022) Reginald K. Ellis, Florida A&M University (2023) At Large: Sarah Mellors, Missouri State University (2021) 2020 Appointed Officers Executive Director: James Grossman AHR Editor: Alex Lichtenstein, Indiana University, Bloomington Treasurer: William F.
    [Show full text]
  • Interrogating Religion in Prison: Criminological Approaches
    University of Wollongong Research Online Faculty of Social Sciences - Papers Faculty of Arts, Social Sciences & Humanities 2014 Interrogating religion in prison: Criminological approaches Natalia K. Hanley University of Wollongong, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.uow.edu.au/sspapers Part of the Education Commons, and the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Hanley, Natalia K., "Interrogating religion in prison: Criminological approaches" (2014). Faculty of Social Sciences - Papers. 2010. https://ro.uow.edu.au/sspapers/2010 Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library: [email protected] Interrogating religion in prison: Criminological approaches Abstract A preliminary exploration of the contemporary literature on imprisonment and religion suggests three dominant themes: role/effectiveness; risk/security, and human rights. While these themes are interconnected, the literature is broadly characterised by competing and contradictory research questions and conclusions. When taken together, this body of criminological work offers a complex but partial account of the role of religion in contemporary prisons which does not appear to engage with questions about how the provision of religious services is mediated by local prison governance structures. Keywords approaches, criminological, prison, interrogating, religion Disciplines Education | Social and Behavioral Sciences Publication Details
    [Show full text]
  • Religiousness and Post-Release Community Adjustment Graduate Research Fellowship – Final Report
    The author(s) shown below used Federal funds provided by the U.S. Department of Justice and prepared the following final report: Document Title: Religiousness and Post-Release Community Adjustment Graduate Research Fellowship – Final Report Author(s): Melvina T. Sumter Document No.: 184508 Date Received: September 25, 2000 Award Number: 99-IJ-CX-0001 This report has not been published by the U.S. Department of Justice. To provide better customer service, NCJRS has made this Federally- funded grant final report available electronically in addition to traditional paper copies. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. “Religiousness and Post-Release Community Adjustment” Graduate Research Fellowship - Final Report Melvina T. Sumter This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF CRIMINOLOGY AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE RELIGIOUSNESS AND POST-RELEASE COMMUNITY ADJUSTMENT BY MELVINA T. SUMTER A Dissertation submitted to the School of Criminology and Criminal Justice in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctorate of Philosophy Degree Awarded: . Fall Semester, 1999 Copyright 0 1999 Melvina T. Sumter All Rights Reserved This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report has not been published by the Department.
    [Show full text]
  • If I Give My Soul: Pentecostalism Inside of Prison in Rio De Janeiro
    If I Give My Soul: Pentecostalism inside of Prison in Rio de Janeiro. A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY Andrew Reine Johnson IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Dr. Penny Edgell, Adviser August 2012 Copyright © 2012 Andrew Reine Johnson All rights reserved Acknowledgments First, I would like to thank my parents, Gordon and Hope, my brother Peter and fiancé Rosane. I am so grateful for each one of them and thankful for their unwavering love. I would also like to thank my adviser Penny Edgell for the mentoring, guidance and persistent support she has provided over the last five years. I want to thank the other members of my dissertation committee, Chris Uggen, Joshua Page and Curtiss DeYoung, for the substantial contributions each one has made to this project. I thank Elizabeth Sussekind for sponsoring my research in Rio de Janeiro and for her insights on the Brazilian Criminal Justice system. I could not have gained access to the prisons and jails without the help and friendship of Antonio Carlos Costa, president of Rio de Paz, and I admire his work and vision for those on the margins of Rio de Janeiro. I also want to thank Darin Mather and Arturo Baiocchi for their friendship as well as their sociological and grammatical insights. I would like to thank Noah Day for his generosity during tight times and Valdeci Ferreira for allowing me to stay in the APAC prison system. Finally, I would like to thank the inmates, ex-prisoners and detainees who participated in this project for the hospitality and trust they showed me during the fieldwork for the project.
    [Show full text]
  • Roles and Identities of the Anglican Chaplain: a Prison Ethnography
    Peter Phillips Roles and identities of the Anglican chaplain: a prison ethnography A thesis submitted in accordance with the regulations for the award of the degree of PhD at Cardiff University November 2013 i DECLARATIONS This work has not been submitted in substance for any other degree or award at this or any other university or place of learning, nor is being submitted concurrently in candidature for any degree or other award. Signed ………………………………………… (candidate) Date ………………………… STATEMENT 1 This thesis is being submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of …………………………(insert MCh, MD, MPhil, PhD etc, as appropriate) Signed ………………………………………… (candidate) Date ………………………… STATEMENT 2 This thesis is the result of my own independent work/investigation, except where otherwise stated. Other sources are acknowledged by explicit references. The views expressed are my own. Signed ………………………………………… (candidate) Date ………………………… STATEMENT 3 I hereby give consent for my thesis, if accepted, to be available for photocopying and for inter-library loan, and for the title and summary to be made available to outside organisations. Signed ………………………………………… (candidate) Date ………………………… STATEMENT 4: PREVIOUSLY APPROVED BAR ON ACCESS I hereby give consent for my thesis, if accepted, to be available for photocopying and for inter-library loans after expiry of a bar on access previously approved by the Academic Standards & Quality Committee. Signed ………………………………………… (candidate) Date ………………………… ii SUMMARY In this ethnography, writing as both practitioner and researcher, I represent and analyse the opinions and reflections of Anglican chaplains in English and Welsh prisons in order to locate their self-perception of role and identity. The Anglican chaplain has been a statutory appointment in every prison since 1779 and was a central figure in penal practice throughout the first half of the 19th century.
    [Show full text]
  • View of the Case: Policymaking Process in the Juvenile Justice Educational Enhancement Program
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2017 Policymaking in Florida's Juvenile Justice Education: An Analysis of Three Policy Frameworks Catherine A. Oakley Follow this and additional works at the DigiNole: FSU's Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected] FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF EDUCATION POLICYMAKING IN FLORIDA’S JUVENILE JUSTICE EDUCATION: AN ANALYSIS OF THREE POLICY FRAMEWORKS By CATHERINE A. OAKLEY A Dissertation submitted to the Department of Educational Leadership and Policy Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2017 Catherine A. Oakley defended this dissertation on December 6, 2017. The members of the supervisory committee were: Linda B. Schrader Professor Co-Directing Dissertation Patrice Iatarola Professor Co-Directing Dissertation Thomas G. Blomberg University Representative William Bales Committee Member Robert Schwartz Committee Member The Graduate School has verified and approved the above-named committee members, and certifies that the dissertation has been approved in accordance with university requirements. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank my major professor Dr. Linda Schrader, for her tireless efforts and continuous supportive, positive, and encouraging spirit in guiding me in this process. I would also like to thank my committee members Dr. Iatarola, Dr. Schwartz, and Dr. Bales for their helpful insights. I would like to especially thank Dr. Thomas Blomberg, who inspired me to reach beyond my own limitations, dream bigger than I believed possible, and for giving me the opportunity to put that into practice. I would like to thank my dear friend Anne, who introduced me to higher education, and has supported and mentored me every step along the way.
    [Show full text]