DOCSLIB.ORG

Seeds, Scientists & Genetically Modified Organisms: Genetic

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Seeds, Scientists & Genetically Modified Organisms: Genetic Seeds, Scientists & Genetically Modified Organisms: Genetic Engineering Practices and Global Connections by Christina Holmes Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at Dalhousie University Halifax, Nova Scotia April 2008 © Copyright by Christina Holmes, 2008 Library and Bibliotheque et 1*1 Archives Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-39087-0 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-39087-0 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives and Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par Plntemet, prefer, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans loan, distribute and sell theses le monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, worldwide, for commercial or non­ sur support microforme, papier, electronique commercial purposes, in microform, et/ou autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. this thesis. Neither the thesis Ni la these ni des extraits substantiels de nor substantial extracts from it celle-ci ne doivent etre imprimes ou autrement may be printed or otherwise reproduits sans son autorisation. reproduced without the author's permission. In compliance with the Canadian Conformement a la loi canadienne Privacy Act some supporting sur la protection de la vie privee, forms may have been removed quelques formulaires secondaires from this thesis. ont ete enleves de cette these. While these forms may be included Bien que ces formulaires in the document page count, aient inclus dans la pagination, their removal does not represent il n'y aura aucun contenu manquant. any loss of content from the thesis. Canada DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY To comply with the Canadian Privacy Act the National Library of Canada has requested that the following pages be removed from this copy of the thesis: Preliminary Pages Examiners Signature Page (pii) Dalhousie Library Copyright Agreement (piii) Appendices Copyright Releases (if applicable) Table of Contents List of Tables viii List of Figures ix Abstract x List of Abbreviations Used xi Acknowledgements xii Chapter 1 Introduction 1 Why Look at GMOs? 1 What Are GMOs?: Definition 4 Global GMO Use 4 Why Has the Issue Been Contentious? 7 Conceptual Influences 9 Situating the Research 13 Overview of Chapters 15 Chapter 2 Bringing GMOs Into Being: An Archaeology of Plant Breeding Practices 18 Introduction 18 Historical Ontology and GMOs 20 Plant Breeding Practices: From the Field to the Laboratory 23 In Situ Farmer Plant Breeding 25 Plant Breeding Beginnings and the Archaeological Record 25 Contemporary Ethnographic Accounts of Farmer In Situ Plant Breeding 32 Precursors of Scientific Plant Breeding: Botanical Investigation in the Renaissance and Colonial Period 42 The Establishment of Scientific Plant Breeding 48 The Rise of New Botany: Experimentation and Laboratory Work 50 Professionalization Among Plant Breeders 52 Combining Selection with a Greater Knowledge of Genetic Factors: The Influence of Darwin and Mendel 53 High Yield Varieties and Agricultural Changes 61 Biotechnology 63 IV Development of Molecular Biology and Biotechnological Tools 63 Tissue Culture 65 Marker Assisted Breeding 66 Genetic Engineering 67 Genetic Engineering, 'Newness', and Substantial Equivalence 69 Conclusion 71 Chapter 3 Methodology 74 Introduction 74 Methodological Framework 75 Participant Observation 77 Fieldsite 1: A Government Laboratory in Canada 79 Fieldsite 2: An International Laboratory in Colombia 81 Short Term Participant Observation and Temporary Fieldsites: 84 Colombian Laboratory Tours and Visits 84 Biotechnology Conference, September 2004, Bogota, Colombia 84 Canadian Laboratory Visits 85 GE3LS Conference February, 2003, Montreal, QC, Canada 85 Qualitative Interviews 86 Documents Examined for Ethnography 91 Data Analysis 92 Considerations of Power 94 Ethical Considerations 96 Harm 97 Privacy and Anonymity 98 Informed Consent 100 Summary 103 Chapter 4 GMOs in Laboratories 104 Introduction 104 Looking at the Local and the Global 107 Looking at Laboratories 108 Describing the Two Laboratories 116 Ottawa Government Laboratory 117 v Canada 117 A Day in the Laboratory 118 Roles in the Laboratory 122 How Do GMOs Fit? 126 Centro International de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT) 132 Colombia 132 A Day in the Laboratory 134 Roles in the Biotecnologia Unit 137 How Do GMOs Fit? 141 Comparing Sites of GMO Construction 148 Conclusion 155 Chapter 5 Debating GMOs: From Objects of Contention to Boundary Objects 157 Introduction 157 GMOs as Boundary Objects 159 GMOs in the Social Science Literature 161 Public Opinion & Public Debate on GMOs 161 Connecting Political and Economic Issues to GMOs: Local and International Governance & Trade 165 Social Science and Science: Homogeneity Versus Heterogeneity in Viewing GMOs 170 GMOs and the Metaphor of the Tool 172 Classifying GMOs 174 Methods for Creating GMOs: Transformation, Plant Tissue, & DNA Source 176 General Purpose of GMO Research 178 Difference in Breeding Goals 181 Intended Use (Or Who Is It For?) 182 Yield Enhancement (Or Increasing a Farmer's Harvest) 184 Enhancement of Plant Qualities (Or Making Plants Better for You) 188 Molecular (Ph)Farming 189 Differences in Plant Species and Variety Used 191 Differences in Disciplinary Settings 195 Summary 196 VI Internal Heterogeneity and the Implication for GMOs as Boundary Objects: Into the Regulatory Realm 199 Conclusion 203 Chapter 6 GMOs in the Global: Snapshots from a Science-scape 205 Landscape: Looking at GMOs from Outside Genetic Engineering... 214 Landscape Snapshot #1: Are GMOs Useful and Where Does the Corporation Fit In? 214 Landscape Snapshot #2: GMOs and Biotechnology as Knowledge Building Tools 217 Landscape Snapshot #3: Too Much Emphasis on Science in Plant Breeding? 219 Connections: GMOs and Scientific Exchange 223 Connections Snapshot #1: Connections Through Students 225 Connections Snapshot #2: Connections Through Collaboration 226 Connections Snapshot #3: Connections to Funding & Farmers 229 Disconnections: GMOs and Inequalities 233 Disconnections Snapshot #1: Plant Scientific Capital 233 Disconnections Snapshot #2: Disconnections in Resources and Language 237 Disconnections Snapshot #3: Disconnections Though Intellectual Property 240 Why Are GMOs Important Anyway?: Scientific Motivations and Social Action 242 Motivations Snapshot #1: Genetic Engineering for the Future 243 Motivations Snapshot # 2: Neglected Crops and Searching for Solutions 245 Motivations Snapshot #3: Biodiversity in the Context of International Competition 250 Conclusion: Knowledge Building & Inequalities 252 Chapter 7 Conclusion 256 Review of Research Results 256 Implications for Understanding GMOs 257 Conceptual Implications 265 Future Research Questions and Final Comments 267 Reference List 271 vu List of Tables Table 1: Key Features of Darwinian or Population Breeding versus Mendelian or Pedigree Breeding 55 Table 2: Interviews Completed in Canada and Colombia 87 vin List of Figures Figure 1: Typology of GMO Heterogeneity as Seen by Scientists 175 Figure 2: Socio-Technical Choices in GMO Creation 198 IX Abstract Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) are created within a global assemblage of practices that incorporate complex, and sometimes conflicting, scientific, economic, technological, political, and cultural elements. Not all GMOs are the same; they differ depending on, for example, the plants used or the social and scientific goals for their creation. I suggest that scientists using genetic engineering see 'GMO' as a heterogeneous category in which GMOs can take very different forms in different locations. These differences are not widely recognized outside of science by either social scientists or the media in reporting on GMOs. This tension between viewing GMOs as a homogeneous category with firm boundaries versus a heterogeneous category with many different forms makes them boundary objects. As boundary objects, GMOs must be negotiated by regulators who have to choose whether to categorize them by the suite of processes known as genetic engineering or by the differences between the products and associated risks that result from this process. Furthermore, there is a disjuncture that exists between i) the claims that GMOs will provide widespread societal benefits in the future and ii) the orientation of currently commercialized GMO products towards profitable markets, rather than humanitarian goals. Adopting a multi-sited ethnographic approach to examine plant biotechnology in the public sphere, I engaged in participant observation and qualitative interviews with scientists, regulators, and members of non-governmental organizations in both Canada and Colombia. Participant observation was based in a government laboratory in Canada and at an international research centre in Colombia. My findings suggest that the 'technology transfer' of genetic engineering for development or humanitarian purposes requires critical attention, as
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Perspectives
    Copyright 0 1994 by the Genetics Society of America Perspectives Anecdotal, Historical and Critical Commentaries on Genetics Edited by James F. Crow and William F. Dove Harvard, Agriculture, and the Bussey Institution J. A. Weir Division of Biology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045 The genes are units useful in concise descriptions of the From a movement led by the physicist WALLACESABINE, phenomena of heredity. Their placeof residence is the chro- a GraduateSchool of Applied Science was organized in mosomes. Their behavior brings about the observed facts of 1906 to replace the undergraduate Lawrence Scientific genetics. For the rest, whatwe know about them is merely an interpretation of crossover frequency. In terms of geometry, School. As part of the reorganization in 1908, “Bussey” chemistry, physics, or mechanicswe can give them no descrip became a graduateschool for advanced instruction and tionwhatever. E. M. EAST (1926) research in scientific problems that relate and contrib Ute to practical agriculture and horticulture-this just at the time when the claims ofgenetics could no longer be ENETICS had its first influence in agriculture and ignored. In recommendingto President ELIOTthat W. E. G first achieved independent status in agricultural CASTLE’S work be transferred from Cambridge to the colleges. The main training ground was the Bussey In- Bussey Institution, Dean SABINEwrote, “The University stitution of Harvard University. has Professor Castle to start with; to lose him will be to By his will of 1835, BENJAMINBUSSEY left his extensive lose the best man in the country in genetics.” So instead farm (now the Arnold Arboretum) toHarvard to be held of going to Wisconsin or Yale, CASTLE moved hisanimals forever as a Seminary for “instruction in practical agri- to Forest Hills, soon LO be joined by the noted plant culture, in useful and ornamental gardening,in botany, geneticist EDWARDMURRAY EAST from the Connecticut and in such other branches of natural science, as may Agricultural Experiment Station.
    [Show full text]
  • Rollins Adams Emerson (1873-1947) Horticulturist Pioneer Plant Geneticist Administrator Inspiring Student Adviser Rosalind Morris University of Nebraska-Lincoln
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Agronomy & Horticulture -- Faculty Publications Agronomy and Horticulture Department 1969 Rollins Adams Emerson (1873-1947) Horticulturist Pioneer Plant Geneticist Administrator Inspiring Student Adviser Rosalind Morris University of Nebraska-Lincoln Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/agronomyfacpub Part of the Agricultural Science Commons, Agriculture Commons, Agronomy and Crop Sciences Commons, Botany Commons, Horticulture Commons, Other Plant Sciences Commons, and the Plant Biology Commons Morris, Rosalind, "Rollins Adams Emerson (1873-1947) Horticulturist Pioneer Plant Geneticist Administrator Inspiring Student Adviser" (1969). Agronomy & Horticulture -- Faculty Publications. 901. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/agronomyfacpub/901 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Agronomy and Horticulture Department at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Agronomy & Horticulture -- Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. ROLLINS ADAMS EMERSON (1873-1947) HORTICULTURIST PIONEER PLANT GENETICIST ADMINISTRATOR INSPIRING STUDENT ADVISER This biography was prepared by Rosa I ind Morris Department of Agronomy, University of Nebraska Lincoln, Nebraska 68503 and was presented in part at the Annual Meeting of The Nebraska Academy of Sciences, 1969. An abstract of the talk was published in the Proceedings of The Academy for 1969. ROLLINS ADAMS EMERSON (1873-1947) HORTICULTURIST, PIONEER PLANT GENETICIST, ADMINISTRATOR, INSPIRING STUDENT ADVISER Rosallnd Morris, Department of Agronomy, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska The vigorous and highly productive life of Professor R. A. Emerson spanned 74 years and 7 months. His birth and death took place In New York State, but Nebraska nurtured his early development and schooling.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nature of Tomorrow: Inbreeding in Industrial Agriculture and Evolutionary Thought in Britain and the United States, 1859-1925
    The Nature of Tomorrow: Inbreeding in Industrial Agriculture and Evolutionary Thought in Britain and the United States, 1859-1925 By Theodore James Varno A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor John E. Lesch, Chair Professor Cathryn L. Carson Professor Stephen E. Glickman Fall 2011 The Nature of Tomorrow: Inbreeding in Industrial Agriculture and Evolutionary Thought in Britain and the United States, 1859-1925 © 2011 By Theodore James Varno 1 Abstract The Nature of Tomorrow: Inbreeding in Industrial Agriculture and Evolutionary Thought in Britain and the United States, 1859-1925 By Theodore James Varno Doctor of Philosophy in History University of California, Berkeley Professor John E. Lesch, Chair Historians of science have long recognized that agricultural institutions helped shape the first generation of geneticists, but the importance of academic biology to scientific agriculture has remained largely unexplored. This dissertation charts the relationship between evolutionary thought and industrial agriculture from Charles Darwin’s research program of the nineteenth century through the development of professional genetics in the first quarter of the twentieth century. It does this by focusing on a single topic that was important simultaneously to evolutionary thinkers as a conceptual challenge and to agriculturalists as a technique for modifying organism populations: the intensive inbreeding of livestock and crops. Chapter One traces zoological inbreeding and botanical self-fertilization in Darwin’s research from his articles published in The gardeners’ chronicle in the 1840s and 1850s through his The effects of cross and self fertilisation in the vegetable kingdom of 1876.
    [Show full text]
  • Rollins Adams Emerson 1873-1947
    NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BIOGRAPHICAL MEMOIRS VOLUME XXV FOURTEENTH MEMOIR BIOGRAPHICAL MEMOIR OF ROLLINS ADAMS EMERSON 1873-1947 BY MARCUS M. RHOADES PRESENTED TO THE ACADEMY AT THE ANNUAL MEETING, 1949 ROLLINS ADAMS EMERSON 1873-1947 BY MARCUS M. RHOADES Rollins Adams Emerson, born at Pillar Point, Jefferson County, New York, on May 5, 1873, was the son of Charles D. and Mary Adams Emerson. The first years of his life were spent on his father's farm in Jefferson County. However, when he was seven years of age his parents decided to leave their relatively poor upstate New York farm for the virgin prairie soil of Kearney County, Nebraska, and it was in this mid- western environment that he completed his primary and sec- ondary education. He then enrolled in the College of Agri- culture of the University of Nebraska and received the degree of Bachelor of Science from this institution in 1897. Follow- ing his graduation he accepted a position as Assistant Editor in Horticulture with the Office of Experiment Stations of the United States Department of Agriculture in Washington, D. C, where his duties were largely concerned with the abstracting of scientific papers. This sedentary occupation was not to his liking so in 1899 he returned to his Alma Mater as Horticul- turist in the Nebraska Agriculture Experiment Station and as Assistant Professor of Horticulture on the college faculty. He remained on the Nebraska faculty until 1914, when he left for Cornell. In 1910-11 he took a year's leave of absence which he spent doing graduate work at Harvard University.
    [Show full text]
  • Edward Murray East 1879-1938
    NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BIOGRAPHICAL MEMOIRS VOLUME XXIII NINTH MEMOIR BIOGRAPHICAL MEMOIR OF EDWARD MURRAY EAST 1879-1938 BY DONALD F. JONES PRESENTED TO THE ACADEMY AT THE AUTUMN MEETING, 1944 EDWARD MURRAY EAST 1879-1938 BY DONALD F. JONES ± Since Edward Murray East was one of the world's distin- guished students of heredity, it seems especially appropriate to begin a review of his life with a consideration of his hereditary background. There is a tradition in the East family that Sir Isaac Newton was numbered among the collateral ancestors, but this is diffi- cult to prove, since his grandfather, Isaac Newton East, left his home in boyhood and spoke but little of his people. There is, at least, no doubt that the distinctive name recurs in several generations, also the name of William Harvey, showing an interest and appreciation of men of science. On his mother's side the immigrant paternal ancestor was Matthew Woodruff, who in 1640 was a member of the colony which established Farmington, Connecticut. A great uncle, Ebenezer Bushnell, was a Congregational minister and an administrative officer in Western Reserve University. The biographer and poet, Wil- liam Sloane Kennedy, was a cousin once removed on his mother's side. East's father, William Harvey East, was a man of con- siderable mechanical ability who studied mechanical engineer- ing at the University of Illinois in 1875-1876 and later worked as a machinist, a manufacturer of machinery and chief engineer for a clay products firm. William Harvey East married Sarah Granger Woodruff; their only son, the subject of this sketch, was born at Duquoin, Illinois, on October 4, 1879.
    [Show full text]
  • Edgar Anderson, WH Camp and the Evolutionary
    Descended from Darwin Insights into the History of Evolutionary Studies, 1900–1970 Joe Cain and Michael Ruse, Editors American Philosophical Society Philadelphia • 2009 TRANSACTIONS of the AMERICAN PHILOSOPHICAL SOCIETY Held at Philadelphia For Promoting Useful Knowledge Volume 99, Part 1 Copyright © 2009 by the American Philosophical Society for its Transactions series, Volume 99. All rights reserved. ISBN: 978-1-60618-991-7 US ISSN: 0065-9746 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available from the Library of Congress. Cain and Ruse. 2009. Descended from Darwin (Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society) Chapter 4 Biosystematics and the Origin of Species Edgar Anderson, W. H. Camp, and the Evolutionary Synthesis Kim Kleinman The very process of synthesis combines disparate elements into a coherent whole, making complex phenomena more comprehensible as we understand which factors are decisive and, as importantly, which ones less so. Synthesis is a powerful intellectual tool, a beacon that illuminates a wide swath of previously unrelated facts, theories, and even disciplines. In biology in the second quarter of the twentieth century, just such a synthesis between genetics and evolutionary theory flourished through the work of R. A. Fisher, Sewall Wright, J. B. S. Haldane, Theodosius Dobzhansky, Ernst Mayr, George Gaylord Simpson, and many, many others. In addition to his crucial scientific work, Mayr made an invaluable organizational contribution through the Society for the Study of Evolution and its journal Evolution
    [Show full text]
  • EDGAR ANDERSON November 9,1897-June 18,1969
    NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES E D G A R A NDERSON 1897—1969 A Biographical Memoir by G. L E D Y A R D S TEbbINS Any opinions expressed in this memoir are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Academy of Sciences. Biographical Memoir COPYRIGHT 1978 NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES WASHINGTON D.C. EDGAR ANDERSON November 9,1897-June 18,1969 BY G. LEDYARD STEBBINS DGAR ANDERSON left an indelible impression on the plant E science of the twentieth century. His entire life revolved about his love of plants—wild and domestic, in nature and in the garden—and his eagerness inspired students and laymen alike with a similar admiration for and love of the plant world. His research was original in conception, based on precise observa- tions and experiments, and followed by interpretations that were significant and stimulating, even if sometimes incorrect. As a teacher of graduate students, he produced several of the leading evolutionary botanists of our day. His methods of recording variation in populations have been spread by his stu- dents and admirers throughout the world and are widely used both by students in classes and by research botanists in their publications. Moreover, as a staff member of two major botan- ical gardens, he took his relations with plant lovers and garden- ers very seriously, whatever their position and interests. He developed this relationship by innumerable visits to private gardens and by personally guiding many visitors through the Arnold Arboretum of Harvard University in Boston and the Missouri Botanical Garden in St.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of Plant Breeding at Cornell University
    Published by The Internet-First University Press Evolution of Plant Breeding at Cornell University Spring 1909 A Centennial History 1907–2006 Royse P. Murphy with Lee B. Kass Department Histories - Cornell University – http://ecommons.library.cornell.edu/handle/1813/14144 The Internet-First University Press – http://ecommons.library.cornell.edu/handle/1813/62 This content appears online at Cornell University’s eCommons for open access distribution and then in the more traditional physical forms (CD and bound book) for a modest user fee. This approach obviates the need for other libraries (or indeed individuals for personal usage) to acquire, catalog and store this content. How- ever, redistribution and all other rights remain with the copyright holders. The IFUP was co-founded by J. Robert Cooke and Kenneth M. King. Online access to this book and the multimedia resources contained on the associated DVD are at: Department Histories – Cornell University http://ecommons.library.cornell.edu/handle/1813/14144 Internet-First University Press http://ecommons.library.cornell.edu/handle/1813/62 Perfect bound copies of this book may be ordered via e-mail: [email protected] P This book was written by Professor Emeritus Royse P. Murphy with Visiting Professor Lee B. Kass and released after the Centennial Celebration of the Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics in 2007. 4 6 2 3 5 7 8 1 10 11 12 13 14 9 Cover Photo 1. HB Frost, 2. CE Leighty, 3. LH Waldron, 4. HB Brown, 5. H Beckenstrater, 6. SF Willard, Jr., 7. LD Batchelor, 8. MJ Dorsey 9. CF Clark, 10.
    [Show full text]