Beyond Borders Global Biotechnology Report 2010

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Beyond Borders Global Biotechnology Report 2010 Beyond borders Global biotechnology report 2010 To our clients and friends As economies around the world begin to recover from the worst diminished means, key constituents in the biotechnology economic crisis since the Great Depression, it is clear that a “new ecosystem — investors, pharmaceutical companies, payors, normal” is emerging. Among other things, this is a world in which governments and biotech firms — need to do more with less. capital flows are far more constrained than during the easy money- Companies that are able to develop creative solutions to boost fueled decade that preceded the downturn. What impact has this efficiency will be best positioned to succeed in the new normal. capital-constrained environment had on biotechnology — a business Readers of Beyond borders will notice some structural changes that is based on an enormous hunger for capital coupled with an in this year’s report. In prior years, we organized the report by exceptionally long path to commercial payback? geography, with sections on the Americas, Europe and Asia-Pacific. We set out to answer that question in this year’s Beyond borders. This year, we have instead organized the report thematically. As usual, we analyze key indicators of the industry’s performance: The Global perspective section brings together our point of view financing activity, deal trends, financial results, pipeline strength on salient trends and implications as well as some perspectives and product approvals. While the overall results are robust, the gap from company leaders. This is followed by a Country profiles between the industry’s haves and its have-nots has widened. section, where we summarize key developments in countries with developing biotechnology sectors. In the Industry performance Our Global introduction article pulls together these trends and section, we analyze data from locations with established assesses their implications for biotechnology companies. In biotechnology centers: the US, Europe, Canada and Australia. We particular, we focus on new models and creative approaches that think this allows us to more appropriately analyze developments companies and investors are taking to adapt to today’s challenging in markets of different maturity and allows readers to more easily economic climate. Accompanying our article are six Perspectives access and compare thematic trends. for the new normal by leaders of companies that are using innovative approaches to finance companies, raise capital, conduct Ernst & Young’s life sciences professionals stand ready to help you R&D and structure deals. as you navigate the unprecedented challenges and opportunities in the new normal. The common thread that runs through this discussion — indeed, the mantra of the new normal — is the search for efficiency. In a time of Glen T. Giovannetti Gautam Jaggi Global Biotechnology Leader Managing Editor, Beyond borders Global Life Sciences Center Global Life Sciences Center Ernst & Young Ernst & Young Contents The new normal: the global perspective 2 Global introduction The new normal 7 Perspectives for the new normal Asset-centric financing Francesco De Rubertis and Michèle Ollier, Index Ventures 9 Perspectives for the new normal Lean proof of concept Michael Clayman, Flexion Therapeutics 12 A closer look Reforming US health care Connie Austin, Ernst & Young LLP 14 Perspectives for the new normal Focus and leverage Edward Lanphier, Sangamo BioSciences 16 Perspectives for the new normal Succeeding together Leonard Schleifer, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals 17 Perspectives for the new normal Efficiency and leverage John Maraganore, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals 20 Perspectives for the new normal There's gold in those efficiencies Werner Lanthaler, Evotec AG 21 Bioech innovation and the role of public policy James Greenwood, Biotechnology Industry Organization 22 Using FIPNet to supercharge the innovation engine John Lechleiter, Eli Lilly and Company New opportunities: country profiles 26 Conversation on emerging markets New opportunities Kiran Mazumdar-Shaw, Biocon Canwen Jiang, Genzyme 30 China year in review Accelerating reforms 31 A closer look Providing incentives to encourage continuous quality improvement Cherrie Che, Ernst & Young Advisory Services Ltd 36 India year in review Preparing for the opportunities ahead 39 Japan year in review Rekindling investment 41 A closer look Funding innovation Yuji Anzai, Ernst & Young Shin Nihon LLC 43 Singapore year in review Manufacturing a biopharmaceutical hub 45 New Zealand year in review A new pragmatism 47 Brazil year in review Fueling the future 50 Malaysia year in review A strategic focus on biotech A transformational year: industry performance 54 Financial performance A transformational year • United States • Europe • Canada • Australia 55 A closer look Seeking efficiency: considerations when operating beyond borders Bruce Bouchard, Ernst & Young LLP 63 Venturing forth with creative approaches Søren Carlsen, Novo Ventures 64 Financing A higher bar • United States • Europe • Canada • Australia 68 A closer look Anatomy of a private equity IPO Michael Constantino, Ernst & Young LLP 74 A closer look Tapping economic development incentives Ron Xavier, Ernst & Young LLP 75 Turbulent financial markets and the impact on biotech Fred Frank, Peter J Solomon Company 76 Deals A new landscape • United States • Europe • Canada • Australia 79 A closer look Valuing milestones Michelle Mittelsteadt, Ernst & Young LLP 85 Striking a healthy balance Dan Zabrowski, Roche 86 Products and pipeline Steady growth • United States • Europe 92 A closer look Uncertain by design: preparing for outcomes-based pricing arrangements Anthony Masherelli, Ernst & Young LLP 96 Perspectives on personalized medicine What one thing would you change to accelerate the adoption of personalized medicine? • Edward Abrahams, Personalized Medicine Coalition • Ken Berlin, Rosetta Genomics Ltd. • Anne Wojcicki, 23andMe • Kathy Giusti, Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation/Multiple Myeloma Research Consortium • Brook Byers, Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers • Jay Wohlgemuth, Quest Diagnostics • Robert Epstein, Medco • Steven Averbuch, Bristol-Myers Squibb 98 Roundtable on biofuels Embracing the future • Gil Forer, Ernst & Young LLP • Mark Bandak, Blackstone Advisory Partners • Olivier Mace, BP Biofuels • Bill Haywood, LS9 • William Roe, Coskata 103 Acknowledgments 104 Data exhibit index 106 Global biotechnology contacts 108 Ernst & Young thought leadership The new normal The global perspective Global introduction The new normal Last year’s Beyond borders was written in emerging biotechnology companies took usual?”) dwelt on these developments and late 2008 and early 2009, in the darkest drastic restructuring measures, focusing their likely impact on the biotech business depths of the global financial crisis. In those pipeline development efforts, trimming model. Despite restructuring efforts, we dramatic months — as policy-makers and payrolls and even predicted that there would be a significant regulators struggled to avert a total meltdown selling assets. reduction in the number of companies, of global banking and finance — stock markets and that access to capital would likely Not surprisingly, last year’s Global plummeted, credit froze and capital seized remain constrained for the foreseeable introduction article (“Beyond business as up. Amid pervasive uncertainty, many future. We worried about the implications The not-quite-global crisis: estimated GDP growth rates in 2009 China India Vietnam Indonesia Philippines Poland Australia Brazil Israel South Korea New Zealand Switzerland France US Singapore Malaysia Belgium Denmark EU UK Netherlands Sweden Germany Japan Ireland Russia -10% -8% -6% -4% -2% 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% Estimated 2009 GDP growth rate Source: CIA World Factbook 2 Beyond borders Global biotechnology report 2010 for biotech’s sustainability — that the businesses — traditionally a key engine Haves and have-nots: more of the business model the industry has long of job creation. Amid talk of a prolonged same? thrived on would be starved of its key input “jobless recovery,” most economists now (funding) and companies’ efforts to cull expect that high unemployment levels will While the overall numbers mentioned their pipelines would lower the model’s remain part of the new normal for some above — capital raised, alliance activity, key output (innovation). We wondered time to come, with potential implications for profitability — are heartening, they only tell whether recovery, when it came, might economic and social stability. part of the story. Economic dislocations bring not a return to normal, but rather the produce winners and losers, and the real The situation for biotech is similarly emergence of a “new normal,” requiring impact is found not in aggregates and mixed. On the surface, it would appear new models for sustainability. And we averages but in measures of variance that the worst is indeed over. Aggregate described four paradigm-shifting trends and standard deviation. While aggregate funding levels rebounded nicely in 2009 that could potentially create a path to more financing levels have held up well, the and strategic alliance activity remains sustainable business models in the future. availability of capital is challenging for robust. Financial performance has many companies. A year later, the dust has settled and the been fairly strong — particularly under outlines of a new normal are indeed starting the circumstances — with remarkable Indeed, our analysis shows
Recommended publications
  • 2009: Turning the Corner
    data page 2009: Turning the corner Walter Yang Despite the shaky start to 2009, the biotech sector regained its financial Although initial public offerings showed signs of resuscitation (at least footing. Biotech indices were up, as were offerings and partnership mon- 13 more companies are now in the queue), follow-on financings came in ies. Excluding collaborations, the sector raised a total of $24.3 billion. above $6 billion—the second-best year over the past decade. Stock market performance Global biotech industry financing Although biotech indices were up ~16% last year, they underperformed The boost in partnership promises to US biotechs and follow-on financings other major indices. pushed industry funding to $61.3 billion, up 82% from 2008. 1,500 Swiss Market S&P 500 2009 36.9 10.0 5.1 2.2 6.0 0.9 1,400 NASDAQ Biotech Dow Jones 2008 20.0 3.2 5.3 3.1 1.9 0.1 1,300 NASDAQ BioCentury 100 2007 22.4 11.7 6.8 4.7 4.4 3.0 1,200 Partnering 2006 19.8 11.9 5.6 4.7 5.6 2.0 1,100 Year Debt and other Index 17.3 6.1 5.4 2.7 4.8 1.9 1,000 2005 Venture capital PIPEs 900 2004 10.9 8.8 5.3 2.9 3.3 2.6 Follow-ons 800 2003 8.9 9.1 4.0 2.2 3.9 0.5 IPOs 700 010203040506070 Amount raised ($ billions) 1/09 2/09 3/09 4/09 5/09 6/09 7/09 8/09 9/09 12/08 Month ending 10/09 11/09 12/09 Partnership figures are for deals involving a US company.
    [Show full text]
  • Transcept Pharmaceuticals, Inc
    Table of Contents SCHEDULE 14A (RULE 14A 101) INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(A) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (AMENDMENT NO. ) Filed by the Registrant x Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ¨ Check the appropriate box: ¨ Preliminary Proxy Statement ¨ Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by x Definitive Proxy Statement Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) ¨ Definitive Additional Materials ¨ Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 Transcept Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter) (Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant) Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): x No fee required. ¨ Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. (1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: (2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: (3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): (4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: (5) Total fee paid: ¨ Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. ¨ Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. (1) Amount Previously Paid: (2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: (3) Filing Party: (4) Date Filed: Table of Contents NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS JUNE 23, 2011 To Our Stockholders: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Transcept Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Delaware corporation, will be held on Thursday, June 23, 2011, at 8:30 a.m., local time, at our office located at 1003 West Cutting Blvd., Suite 110, Point Richmond, California 94804, for the following purposes: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Manufacturers and Wholesalers Street
    Nevada AB128 Code of Conduct Compliant Companies Manufacturers and Wholesalers Street City ST Zip 10 Edison Street LLC 13 Edison Street LLC Abbott Diabetes Care Division Abbott Diagnostic Division Abbott Electrophysiology (including Kalila Medical 2- 2016)) Abbott Laboratories 100 Abbott Park Road, Dept. EC10, Bldg. APGA-2 Abbott Park IL 60064 Abbott Medical Optics Abbott Molecular Division Abbott Nutrition Products Division Abbott Vascular Division (includes Tendyne 9-2015) AbbVie, Inc. 1 N. Waukegan Road North Chicago IL 60064 Acadia Phamaceuticals 3611 Valley Centre Drive, Suite 300 San Diego CA 92130 Accelero Health Partners, LLC Acclarent, Inc. 1525-B O'Brien Dr. Menlo Park CA 94025 Accuri Cyometers, Inc. Ace Surgical Supply, Inc. 1034 Pearl St. Brockton MA 02301 Acorda Therapeutics, Inc. 420 Sawmill River Road Ardsley NY 10532 AcriVet, Inc. Actavis W.C. Holding, Inc. Morris Corporate Center III, 400 Interpace Parkway Parsippany NJ 07054 Actavis , Inc. Actelion Pharmaceuticals US, Inc. 5000 Shoreline Court, Suite 200 S. San Francisco CA 94080 Activis 400 Interpace parkway Parsippany NJ 07054 A-Dec, Inc. 2601 Crestview Dr. Newberg OR 97132 Advanced Respiratory, Inc. Advanced Sterilization Products 33 Technology Drive Irvine CA 92618 Advanced Vision Research, Inc., dba Akorn Consumer Health Aegerion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 101 Main Street, Suite 1850 Cambridge MA 02142 Aesculap Implant Systems, Inc. Aesculap, Inc. 3773 Corporate Parkway Center Valley PA 18034 Aesthera Corporation Afaxys, Inc. PO Box 20158 Charleston SC 29413 AGMS, Inc. Akorn (New Jersey) Inc. Page 1 of 23 Pages 2/15/2017 Nevada AB128 Code of Conduct Compliant Companies Akorn AG (formerly Excelvision AG) Akorn Animal Health, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of Ftc Antitrust Actions in Pharmaceutical Services and Products
    OVERVIEW OF FTC ANTITRUST ACTIONS IN PHARMACEUTICAL SERVICES AND PRODUCTS Health Care Division Bureau of Competition Federal Trade Commission Washington D.C. 20580 Markus H. Meier Assistant Director Bradley S. Albert Deputy Assistant Director Saralisa C. Brau Deputy Assistant Director September 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. INTRODUCTION. ........................................................... 1 II. CONDUCT INVOLVING PHARMACEUTICAL SERVICES AND PRODUCTS. 3 A. Monopolization. ...................................................... 3 B. Agreements Not to Compete. ............................................ 8 C. Agreements on Price or Price-Related Terms. 14 D. Agreements to Obstruct Innovative Forms of Health Care Delivery or Financing. 20 E. Illegal Tying and Other Arrangements. .................................... 20 III. PHARMACEUTICAL MERGERS. ........................................... 20 A. Horizontal Mergers Between Direct Competitors. 20 B. Potential Competition Mergers. ......................................... 44 C. Innovation Market Mergers. ............................................ 47 D. Vertical Mergers...................................................... 49 IV. INDUSTRY GUIDANCE STATEMENTS...................................... 50 A. Advisory Opinions. ................................................... 50 B. Citizen Petition to the Food and Drug Administration. 51 V. AMICUS BRIEFS. ......................................................... 51 VI. INDICES. ............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • CONCERT PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 SCHEDULE 14A Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Filed by the Registrant x Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ¨ Check the appropriate box: ¨ Preliminary Proxy Statement ¨ Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) x Definitive Proxy Statement ¨ Definitive Additional Materials ¨ Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12 CONCERT PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) (Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant) Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): x No fee required. ¨ Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. (1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: (2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: (3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): (4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: (5) Total fee paid: ¨ Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. ¨ Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. (1) Amount Previously Paid: (2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: (3) Filing Party: (4) Date Filed: 1 Concert Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Secondary Innovation on Firm Market Value in the Pharmaceutical Industry
    The Impact of Secondary Innovation on Firm Market Value in the Pharmaceutical Industry By: Maitri Punjabi Honors Thesis Economics Department The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill March 2016 Approved: ______________________________ Dr. Jonathan Williams Punjabi 2 Abstract This paper analyzes the effect of the changing nature of innovation on pharmaceutical firm market value from the years 1987 to 2010 by using U.S. patent and claim data. Over the years, firms have started shifting focus from primary innovation to secondary innovation as new ideas and new compounds become more difficult to generate. In this study, we analyze the impact of this patent portfolio shift on the market capitalization of pharmaceutical firms. After using firm fixed effects and the instrumental variable approach, we find that there exists a strong positive relationship between secondary innovations and the market value of the firm– in fact, we find a stronger relationship than is observed between primary innovation and market value. When focusing on the different levels of innovation within the industry, we find that this relationship is stronger for less-innovative firms (those that have produced fewer patents) than it is for highly- innovative firms. We also find that this relationship is stronger for firms that spend less on research and development, complementing earlier findings that research productivity is declining over time. Punjabi 3 Acknowledgements I would primarily like to thank my adviser, Dr. Jonathan Williams, for his patience and constant support. Without his kind and helpful attitude, this project would have been a much more frustrating process. Through his knowledge of the industry, I have gained valuable insight and have learned a great deal about a unique and growing field.
    [Show full text]
  • 28 May 2009 Thomas E. Costa
    The Third International Pharmaceutical Regulatory and Compliance Congress and Best Practices Forum Thomas E. Costa 2828 MayMay 20092009 This presentation represents my own personal opinion and is not the official position of Bristol-Myers Squibb PhRMA Code 2009 • Updated in response to concerns of healthcare stakeholders • Reaffirms that interactions between pharmaceutical company representatives and healthcare professionals (HCPs) should: ¾ Inform HCPs about the benefits and risks of our products ¾ Provide scientific and educational information ¾ Obtain feedback and advice about our products through consultation with medical experts • The PhRMA Code is the new industry standard PhRMA Code Signatory Companies • Abbott • Eli Lilly and Company • Amgen, Inc. • Merck & Company, Inc. • Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. • Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. • Astellas US LLC • Novartis Pharmaceuticals • AstraZeneca LP Corporation • Bayer HealthCare • Novo Nordisk Inc. Pharmaceuticals • Otsuka America, Inc. • Boehringer Ingleheim • Ovation Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Pharmaceuticals, Inc. • Pfizer, Inc. • Bristol-Myers Squibb Company • Purdue Pharma LP • Cephalon, Inc. • sanofi-aventis US • Covidien Ltd. • Schering-Plough Corporation • Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. • Sepracor, Inc. • Eisai, Inc. • Signa-Tau Pharmaceuticals, Inc. • EMD Serono • Solstice Neurosciences, Inc. • Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. • Solvay Pharmaceuticals, Inc. • Genzyme Corporation • Takeda Pharmaceuticals North • GlaxoSmithKline America, Inc. • Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc. • Wyeth • Johnson and Johnson
    [Show full text]
  • Management Liability Focus Johnson & Johnson 1
    Insured Profile Report – Management Liability Focus Johnson_________________________________________________________________________ & Johnson Company Profile Credit Details Location 1 Johnson and Johnson Plz Overall Credit Risk High Risk New Brunswick, NJ www.jnj.com Number of Legal Derogatory 84 Company Type Public Items Liability Amount $322,285.00 Formerly Known As N/A Experian Intelliscore 2.57 SIC Code 2834 SIC Code Description Pharmaceutical Preparations Experian Intelliscore Percentile 2.00 % of companies score lower and have higher credit risk Established 1955 Experian Commercial IntelliscoreSM is an all-industry commercial model using business information to predict business risk. Its Sales (in millions) $65,030.00 predictiveness is among the best on the market today The objective of the Commercial Intelliscore Model is to predict seriously Employees 117,900 derogatory payment behavior. Possible score range from 0 to 100, where 0 is high risk and 100 is low risk Total OSHA Violations 18 -Liability Amount is the total dollar amount of debtor’s legal liability, OSHA is an arm of the Department of Labor that conducts inspections of company including accounts in collection, tax liens,judgments and/or bankruptcies facilities with the goal of preventing work-related injuries, illnesses and deaths. -The Number of Legal Derogatory items are the sum of Tax-Lien Worksites that do not meet health and/or safety standards at the time of inspection may Count, Bankruptcy,Judgment, Collection-Counter and UCC Derog receive an OSHA violation. Total FDA NDC Drugs 177 The total number of FDA Drugs filed in the FDA NDC Drug Database. Business Description Johnson & Johnson is engaged in the research and development, manufacture and sale of a range of products in the healthcare field.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Are Some Generic Drugs Skyrocketing in Price? Hearing Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions United States Sena
    S. HRG. 113–859 WHY ARE SOME GENERIC DRUGS SKYROCKETING IN PRICE? HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON PRIMARY HEALTH AND AGING OF THE COMMITTEE ON HEALTH, EDUCATION, LABOR, AND PENSIONS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED THIRTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION ON EXAMINING THE PRICING OF GENERIC DRUGS NOVEMBER 20, 2014 Printed for the use of the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/ U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 24–459 PDF WASHINGTON : 2017 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Nov 24 2008 13:32 May 19, 2017 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 S:\DOCS\24459.TXT DENISE HELPN-003 with DISTILLER COMMITTEE ON HEALTH, EDUCATION, LABOR, AND PENSIONS TOM HARKIN, Iowa, Chairman BARBARA A. MIKULSKI, Maryland LAMAR ALEXANDER, Tennessee PATTY MURRAY, Washington MICHAEL B. ENZI, Wyoming BERNARD SANDERS (I), Vermont RICHARD BURR, North Carolina ROBERT P. CASEY, JR., Pennsylvania JOHNNY ISAKSON, Georgia KAY R. HAGAN, North Carolina RAND PAUL, Kentucky AL FRANKEN, Minnesota ORRIN G. HATCH, Utah MICHAEL F. BENNET, Colorado PAT ROBERTS, Kansas SHELDON WHITEHOUSE, Rhode Island LISA MURKOWSKI, Alaska TAMMY BALDWIN, Wisconsin MARK KIRK, Illinois CHRISTOPHER S. MURPHY, Connecticut TIM SCOTT, South Carolina ELIZABETH WARREN, Massachusetts DEREK MILLER, Staff Director LAUREN MCFERRAN, Deputy Staff Director and Chief Counsel DAVID P. CLEARY, Republican Staff Director SUBCOMMITTEE ON PRIMARY HEALTH AND AGING BERNARD SANDERS, Vermont, Chairman BARBARA A.
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmaceutical Company Contact Information (PDF)
    Pharmaceutical Company Contact Information - Rebate Filing - as of June 2018 Labeler Name Invoice Contact Phone Extension 00002 LILLY USA, LLC LISA NORTON (317) 276-2000 00003 ER SQUIBB AND SONS INC. LYNN LEWIS (609) 897-4731 00004 GENENTECH CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION (650) 866-2666 00005 LEDERLE LABORATORIES DAN MAGUIRE (484) 563-5097 00006 MERCK & CO., INC. DOUG BICKFORD (215) 652-0671 00007 SMITHKLINE BEECHAM DAVID BUCKLEY (215) 751-5690 00008 WYETH LABORATORIES JENNIFER WOOTEN (901) 215-1883 00009 PHARMACIA AND UPJOHN COMPANY/PFIZER JENNIFER WOOTEN (901) 215-1883 00013 PHARMACIA AND UPJOHN COMPANY NICHOLAS CHRISTODOULOU (336) 291-1053 00014 G. D. SEARLE & CO. CINDY MCDONALD (847) 581-5726 00015 MEAD JOHNSON AND COMPANY LYNN LEWIS (609) 897-4731 00016 PHARMACIA INC. BARBARA WINGET (908) 901-7254 00023 ALLERGAN INC SHOBHANA MINAWALA (714) 246-6205 00024 SANOFI WINTHROP PHARMACEUTICALS LAURIE DUNLAP, ADMIN., GOVT. OPERATIONS (212) 551-4198 00025 PHARMACIA CORPORATION NICHOLAS CHRISTODOULOU (336) 291-1053 00026 BAYER CORPORATION PHARMACEUTICAL DIV. LINDA WOLCHESKI (203) 812-6372 00028 NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS (862) 778-8094 00029 SMITHKLINE BEECHAM DAVID BUCKLEY (215) 751-5690 00031 A. H. ROBINS COMPANY DAN MAGUIRE (610) 902-3222 00032 SOLVAY PHARMACEUTICALS STACEY LENOX (847) 937-3979 00033 SYNTEX LABORATORIES, INC. JANICE BRENNAN (973) 562-3494 00034 THE PURDUE FREDERICK COMPANY JUNE STOWE (203) 899-8035 00037 CARTER-WALLACE, INC. JAY R BRENNAN (609) 655-6163 00038 ASTRAZENECA LP DAVID WRIGHT (302) 886-2268 7820 00039 AVENTIS PHARMACEUTICALS (908) 981-7461 00043 NOVARTIS CONSUMER HEALTH, INC. EDWARD D. COLLINS (973) 781-6191 00044 KNOLL LABORATORIES DEBRA DEYOUNG (847) 937-4372 00045 MCNEIL PHARMACEUTICAL (908) 218-6777 00046 AYERST LABORATORIES (901) 215-1473 00047 WARNER CHILCOTT LABORATORIES LISA KAROLCHYK (973) 442-3262 00048 KNOLL PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY DEBRA DEYOUNG (847) 937-4372 00049 ROERIG NICHOLAS CHRISTODOULOU (336) 291-1053 00051 UNIMED PHARMACEUTICALS, INC STACY LENOX (847) 937-3979 00052 ORGANON, USA, INC.
    [Show full text]
  • To Rapidly Navigate Through This Document RIGEL
    QuickLinks -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. ) Filed by the Registrant ý Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o Check the appropriate box: o Preliminary Proxy Statement o Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) ý Definitive Proxy Statement o Definitive Additional Materials o Soliciting Material Pursuant to § 240.14a-12 RIGEL PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. (Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter) (Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement if Other Than the Registrant) Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box) ý No fee required. o Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. 1. Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: 2. Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: 3. Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): 4. Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: 5. Total fee paid: o Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. o Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Allergan 2004 Annual Report
    ALLERGAN 2004 ANNUAL REPORT UNIFOCUSED UELY COMPANY PROFILE Allergan, Inc., with headquarters in Irvine, California, is a global specialty pharmaceutical company that develops and commercializes innovative products for the ophthalmology, neuromodulator, dermatology and other specialty markets. In addition to its discovery-to-development research programs, Allergan has global marketing and sales capabilities in over 100 countries that deliver value to our customers, satisfy unmet medical needs and improve patients’ lives. Driven by technology and innovation, Allergan addresses the needs of patients around the world with approximately 5,000 employees, a global research and development infrastructure and three state-of-the-art manufacturing plants. OUR VISION/OUR MISSION To continue as an innovative, technology driven, global health care company focused on pharmaceuticals in specialty markets that deliver value to customers, satisfy unmet medical needs and improve patients’ lives. To become the partner of choice for ever better health care through the value of our technological innovation, industry leadership, partnering skills and relationships, worldwide infrastructure, research and manufacturing capabilities. To develop a level of understanding of our customers in order to implement operational strategies that provide the greatest value for our customers and stockholders. FINANCIAL OVERVIEW Year Ended December 31, In millions, except per share data 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS HIGHLIGHTS (As reported under U.S. GAAP)
    [Show full text]